FINAL PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY CONCERNING · PDF filepreferred reaeclial altarnativer...

134 lt

FiliAL IVaLIC IIDTIIICI -tY OLD IPRIIIGFBLII LUIIWILL liftmiddot-riiiUIshy

IPRIIIGFIIIUI 101111 BALL ampPitDIGnmo v-r

JULY 12 litO 7130 Ill

FINAL PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY OLD SPRINGFIELD LANDFILL SITE

SPRINGFIELD VERMONT

SPRINGFIELD TOWN HALL SPRINGFIELD VERMONT

JULY 12 1990 7 30 PM

IlllRODOCriOM

On July 12 1990 the us Envi ronaental Protection Aqency (EPA) in conjunction with the Vemont DepartMnt of Enviroruaental Conaervation (Vl DEC) held a public inforutional etinq at the Sprinfield Town Hall in Sprint~field Veraont concerning the Old Springfield Landfill Site The purpoae of the atil9 vaa to preant the findift9bull of the Pocuaecl Peaaibility Study and the Propoeecl Plan for aite raadiation and to anawer queationa froa the public Specific topicbull included an overview of the Supertund procaaa ancl how it relatebull to the Old Sprinfield Landfill aitet deaoription of the aite t definition of each of EPAbull nine evaluation criteria1 4eacription and juatification of BPAa preferred reaeclial altarnativer preaentation an4 copariaon

~~=iit~~nasibulllniro~ ~11[r-~bulld~ua~-= COIIIIampftt period The aCJenda preaented at the _tirtCJ ia attached aa Appendix A AppencSix B ia the Propoee4 Plan

Approxtately 35 people attendS the etiNJ inclwSin aeveral local nevepaper reporterbull The BPA vaa npreaented by David Webetar the Maine and Vezwmt lupertund section Chief 1 Bdward Hathaway the Reaedial Project Jlanaqerr Karoia Laael the Site Attorney t and Ja lebaatian the Counity Relatione Coordinator The State of VelIIOnt vaa repreaented by Thoaaa lloye Diane Conrad and Bill Ahearn froa the Ver110nt Departent of lnvironental Conaervation (VTDEC) 1 and Conrad saith froa the Verwgtnt Office of the Attorney General EPA bull contractor Ebaaco servicebull Incorporated vaa repreaented by Cynthia Hanna The etiftCJ bec)an at approxiaately 7 35 PM

The Metift9 waa approxi Mtely three houra lonq 1 the preaentationa laated approxiaately an hour and were followed by an approxiMtely two hour quaation and anaver period Follovinq the foraal queati on and anaver peri od the EPA and State repreaantative a ware available for inforul d i acuaaiona

David Wabatar opened the bullbulletinq by introducing the VT DEC EPA and overaiqht contractor ataff that ware praaant Hr Webster presented an overview of the Coaprehenaive Environaental Reaourca copanaation and Liability Act (CERCLA) the National Prioritiea

MEETING SUMMARY

coapanaation and Liability Act (CBRCLA) the National Prioritiaa Liat (NPL) and the Superfund procaaa and how it ralataa to the Old Springfield Landfill aite He announced that the public coaaant period would begin on July 13 1990 and cloaa on Auuat 11 1990 and that durin an inforaal public hearing to be held on Auuat 2 1990 EPA would accept oral co-anta He alao deacribed and preaented a tentative achadula for future aite activitiaa

Mr Webater introduced Edward Hathaway who diacuaaad the typea of waataa that have bean detected on-aite and the pathwaybull through which waatea currently contuinate the round and aurfaca water Mr Hathaway praaanted a daacription of the aite hydrogeolOCJY and geology and how it related to the alternativeamp that were evaluated tor the aita r-adiation He alao deacribed and ave the eatiaated coat for each alternative evaluated in the Propoaed Plan and provided a detailed deacription about the operation and appearance of the preferred alternative Mr Hathaway alao noted that the Adlainiatrative Record contained further aupport docuanta for EPA 1a preferred alternative deacribed in the Propoaed Plan and encoura9ed the public to look at thoaa dOCmanta

Mr J-bull Sabaatian cloaed the preaentationa by further -phaaiainq the opportunitiaa for public involv~t and the Technical Aaaiatance Grant (TAG) available for intaraated partiaa Mr David Webater then aoderated the queation and anawer period

COIIIdlrf8 -Jrembullu

Quaationa raiaecl durinv tha public _tinq have been auaariaed into the tollowinq cetevoriee (l) tinenciall (2) liability (3) health ribullkl (4) vibullual etteotbullbull (5) alternativebullbull and (6) aiaoellaneoua Quaationa aaJted and ~nta aada by _tin attend-a and raaponaaa 9ivan by EPA and the VT DEC are auariaed below

liaaaoial

~ Clarification waa raquaated about the definition of the nat praaant value and the plua 50 fainua 30 of the coata for tha alternative aa they ware liated on the coat praaentation poater

~ EPA raaponded that the nat preaant value ia the aaount of aonay nacaaaary to aacura the proaiaa of future payaant or aariea of payaanta at an aaaued intaraat rata A rata of 10 percent for 30 yaara waa uaed in EPA bull calculationbull The tara plua 50 ainua 30 aeana that the alternative coata are eatiaatad baaed on a potential coat variation which ranqaa froa plua 50 percent to ainua 30 percent of the eatiaated coat

~ Several quaationa ware asked about how the town could ba expected to pay auch larqa coata when the town waa axperiancinq an aconoaic dapraaai on

MEETING SUMMARY

IJi~middot ~IL=ttr(~rrbullI

I

) ~ EPA stated that this ia an iaaue that should be addreaaed in the agreaaent(a) that the town aakea with other PRPa

~ One person aakad if alternative nuabar 6 (fancinq and covering of contaainated aoila) would be a batter option at thia tiaa It would coat $500000 and it could be reviewed in five yaara It at that point tha alternative waa not auccaaaful the prafarrad alternative could than be iaplntad

~ EPA indicated that the co-ant waa appropriate and that it abould be aubaittad foraally durinq the public co-ant period ao that it can ba evaluated in the raaponaivanaaa auaaary

~ One person aakad what percantaqa of the clean-up costa tha State would pay it the State vaa involved in tha clean-up activitiaa

~ BPA raaponded that at aitaa where EPA ia the lead a9ancy an4 tile state ia participatiJ9 in the clean-up activitiu the State norally paya 10 percent of tha coata It tha State takea tba lead in aita clean-up than the coat ia aplit evenly between the stata ancl BPA

LioigtUitr

~ Several peopla c_entacl that they did not undaratancl why the state waa not a PkP aince tha State rulationa required that liquid waataa ba placed in landfillbull inataad of diacha19ad into the rivar

~ BPA otticiala incSicatad that accordiNJ to the Supartuncl law altllou9h the State aay recJUlate the 41apoaal of baaardoua vaata tba State ia not hald liable tor the clean-up of tha haaardoua waate unleaa it waa an owner or operator ot the property

~ A taw ~ntara atatad that the Faderal 9overnaant ahould ba held liable for the haaardoua vaata ainca tha aachina tool taotoriaa that generated haaardoua waataa vera produoiNJ toola tor the tadaral qovarnaant durill9 World war II on a coat pluabull contract Tha coat plua aiqnitied that tha qovarnaant would pay tor tha aatariala labor and any other coata aaaociatad with tha tool production Therefore tha iaplication ia that tha qovarnaant ia alao liable tor tha coata aaaociatad with tha cUapoaal ot tha hazardoua waata which ia a byproduct ot tha tool production

~ EPA raaponded that tha supartund law apacitiaa that only ownara oparatora or thoaa who arranged tor tha diapoaal ot tha hazardoua waata on tha aite can be held liable tor tha contaaination

~ ona coDUDentar aakad who wara tha PRPa and how wara thay datarwined

IJirt(tr

I

MEETIKG SUMMARY

~ EPA atated that the aite hiatory ia reviewed and a aeareh parforaecl for all partiea that aay have uaed the alta in any capacity Noticea ware aant to thoaa partiebull that EPA felt vera potentially raaponaibla for contaainatinq the alta EPA explained that under Superfund EPA will pay the coata of alta atudiaa and clean-up activitiaa until tha PRPa can be identified Once tha PRPa are idantifiad EPA neqotiataa with th- for raiaburant of paat coata and payaent of future coata of nacaaaary Superfund activitiaa at the alta If PRP8 cannot be identified then tha Federal qovanmant paya tor the alta clean up

~ One peraon aaked whoa they ahould aua if they have health probl that can ba aaaociated with the alta

BlaiHmlal EPA atatad that thay ahould contact the PRPa

Baaltb aiaka

~ A taw people aaked what are tha health riaU aaaociated with the aita

~ IPA atatct that there are no iadiate riaU However there are potential lont tara riU Tb riaU include 4rinkinv contaainated water brathinv contaainated air invaatinv cont-inated aoil and atinq contaainatct fiah

~ Ona coaentar wanted to know if any vella beyond the Black River have been aonitored for cont-ination They atatct that 14c)ar ICampy (State Repreaentative) aai4 that bia well b oontuinated

~ one coenter vante4 to know why the baaardoua vaata decontaaination area and trailer had to be located right near the road 20 feat froa raaidantial property They atate4 the laat BPA Radial Project Manager proaiaed that aha would try to bulliniaiza the viaual iiipampct of conatruction activitiea at the aite The coaaentar wanted to know who vaa in charqe - EPA or Kr CUrtin (owner of the bullajority of the aita)

JluRSmaAi EPA explained that they are raaponaibla tor anything ralatinq to hazardoua vaata EPA can bullaka auggaationa to the PRPa and the aita owner about how the aita looka but EPA can not control anything that ia not directly related to aita clean-up

~ one parson aaltad if the dUllpatara on the aita would be rebullovad

MEETING SUMMARY

~ EPA raaponded that the dupatara would ba removed before the and of tha auaaar of 1990

AltarDativaa

~ Ona pa raon aakad what would ba dona if after five yaara EPA datarainaa that tha aalactad r ecty ia not auccaaaful

~ EPA raapondad that if the raaady ia not aaating the targeted clean-up goala than BPA will aaka a raaaonabla effort to evaluate and than chanqa or fix the coaponant of the r ady that ia not functioning properly

~ Ona paraon aakecl what a RCRA landfill ia

biraquoRDDaL BPA explained that a RCRA landfill auat at certain requlationa that are defined in tha Reaourca Conaarvation and Recovery Act (RCRA) bull Thaaa r~lationa include aavaral enqinearinq paraaetara that auat be uaed in tha cap bulla daaiCJll and tha typea of cappi9 aatariala that auat be uaed for apecitic waatea In qenaral RCRA atataa that tha landfill IIUAt be aalf-contained

~~ One peraon waa concerned with the potetial for hia privata vall to be affacted by the extraction vall snmpii)(J rataa IPA aipt intend to uaa The penon raquaated that he be kept inforaed ot the propoaed extraction vall pu~~ping rataa durinq the reaedial daaiqn pbaaa

) BaiRiaDaal EPA raaponded that they would Jteap people inforaad of propoed snmpinq rataa The State alao c~ted that the PUJIPinq rataa would not exceed 20 9allona par ainuta

~ One coaentar wanted to know the reaaon why other than the tact that tha coat vaa high altamativa nubar 3 (onaita landfill ot oontuinated aoila) waa not choaan

baiHmUL EPA explained that altamativa 3 y not be aa attactive aa the preferred alternative ainca in altamativa 3 there ia the potential tor untreated raaidual waata to r-ain in tba excavated waata araaa on the aita The preferred alternative would baet aanaga and control the aita contaaination

~ A taw paopla wanted to know how auch of tha land would be uaaabla attar the raaady ia iaplaaantad

biraquoRDDaL EPA explained that land uaa raatrictiona aay apply attar tha raaady ia conatructad The cap would occupy approxillataly eight ot tha 27 acraa~ of tha property Thoaa eight acraa could not ba uaad tor any other purpose

~ ona peraon wanted to know whether tha cap waa an axpariaent and what the auccaaa rata waa for thia type of cap

MEETING SUMMARY

JJirt(r IbullI

biRsmiAt EPA stated that the propoaed cap which ia couonly aalactecJ for a r edy for aitaa of thia tPal ia baaed on the aoat recent RCRA quidanca The propoaed cap would aaka uaa of the atata ot the art tachnoloqiaa and would be aonitorad and repaired aa nacaaaary during the operation of the raaady

~ One peraon aalted what waa the taaaibility of uainq a aicrobial hydrocarbon breakdown ayat- (i bull middot bioctaqradation) bull

biRsmiAt EPA atatad that biodeqradation vaa atudied during the firat faaaibility atudy and waa acraanad out due to the varied typaa of contaaination that are praaant at the alta

~ one peraon wanted to know if the qaa vanta ware really that uaaful ancS if the contuinanta are in the air nov In conjunction with thia quaation tha peraon alao wanted to know why alternative 6 (fancinq an4 covering of contuinatecl aoila) would not be a preferred alternative

BaaamlaaL EPA explained that RCRA requlationa require a 9aa ventinq ayat be uaed There ia potential for uthane 9bullbull to beooe trapped and cauaa an exploaion if the landfill ia not properly vented In adclition all of the 9aa that would be releaaecl froa the vente would be treatecl to anaura that people breathincJ the abient air would not be at riak Alternative nWibctr 6 cannot be conaidaracl for BPAe preferred alternative becauea it doaa not t the applicable relevant and appropriate raquirampMnta

J (ARARa) for a hazardoua vaata landfill of thia type

U-LIUm008

~ One aeleotaan o011plampined that the aalaotaan vera not beiftCJ kept intoned

BaaamlaaL EPA reaponcled that the town aalactaan would be kept inforaed of alta activitiaa cluril9 the Reaedial Deaiqn phaae

~ One peraon aalcecl if there ware currently any land uae reatrictiona for the aita

biRsmiAt The town 11anager responded that the town haa not reatricted the uae of the land on the site

IPA COIOliftiBft8 POR rURlIIBR AClIOM Al 1m IIlB

Durinq the couree of the praaantationa and the question and anewer period EPA aade the following co-itbullenta

o EPA indicated that the dupatara located onaita will be rebulloved betore the and of au-bullr 1990

o EPA indicated that local reaidanta would be kept intoraed ot the proposed extraction wall

MEETING SUMMARY

puapiQ9 ratea 4urinq the aadial Deaiqn ata9a A State rapraaentativa indicated that the pupinq rataa voulcl not exceed 20 9allona perbullinuta

0 ~~ t-r f4acrfttbulldui tho -iol Deei9ft phaoo

MEETING SUIOIARY

APPBIIDIX A

OLD SPIUIIGPIBLD PUBLIC IIDTIIIG AGBIIDA

bullKEETIMG SUMMARY

AGENDA

PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL MEETING OLD SPRINGFIELD LANDFRL SUPERFUND SITE

SPRINGFIEW VERMONT

JULy 12 1990 738PM

I iNTRODUCTION SUPERFUND PROCESS BRIEF SITE IUSTORY

D INVISTIGATION RESULTS DIISCRJPTION OF ALTERNATIVES KVALUATION CRITERIA EPAS PllDKilRKD ALTERNATIVE

ffi PUBLIC PARTICiPATION OPIORTIJNITIKS

IV QUESfiONS AND ANSWERS

Dtwfll Wbullbmr MB amp VT sI[IUid S1c1Na C~ US BariroUNifiJJl lrrctraquoa A6bullac1

B~H_ bull ProjutM US BaringtUNifiJJllrrc~Na A~tac

SINIIIac c_ US BaringtUNifiJJl A~tac

Dtwfll W1brkr MIHinoiDr MB amp VT Stfruul S1ctraquoa Cllill US Barlrobull-1114l Prokctraquoa A6bullac1

APPDOIX B

OLD SPRINGFIBLD LANDFILL JULY 1990 PROPOSID PLAN

MEETING SUMMARY

EPA Region I Proposed Plan Superfund Program Old Springfield Landfill Site Springfield Vermont

JULY 1990

middotEPA Proposes Source Control Cleanup Plan for the

Old Springfield Landfill Site

The US Envitonmealal Proleclioo Apq (EPA) il propooiDa I cleanup p1aD referred to u a pnferred allematM to - tbe aouroo ol coollmiaatioo at tbe Old SpriDpld Landlill Superfuod lite iD Spriqfield v t Tbil pionwill- outier cleanup pion dooolopod iD 1111 to- CDIIIaiDiaoled -middot--- tbeaite Tbil~ Plon-taacleanup-bod --tbecleanupapiDathatOYIJualodduriaatbe 1111 I~ (Ill) tbe 19911 FOCIIIOd Feulbillty Study (FPS) aad tbe 19911

Supplomoalal Foulblllty Study (SIS) performed for tbe lite Ia - shySoctlao117(a)oltbe~---c _ L1M1111J Act (CEilClA) IFA i1 publilllioc tbil ~ Pion to pRWide apport1lllity for pulllic review and C01111110D1 CX1 tbe cleanup ~- U --uador eantidoratioa for tbe lite IFA will coulder pulllic -~~ u port of tbe final docioicJomaki _ for ooloctlna tbe cleanup maedy for the aile

The pnferred ooune coatrolallemaliwl iadudea C01111n1ctiDJ a multiJa tbe _ of bazan1out - ditpoaaJ to reduce tbe IIIIOUIII of woter eateriDJ lite- The cop-s ladudopa- JYIIemt to collocslandllll - and - - to minimize pouadwater 8ow uador the cap The pnferred allemaliwl allo iadudeo IIObililiac tbe aide tlopeo aad inltallatioo of wells ill tbe- _ - uador the- areu Five-feu reviewamp and reltrictiona on future aite use would allo be included u part of the alternative The pnferred altemaliwl il deocribed ill - tee detail on paaea SIO of thil document Tbii~ Pian

1 aplains the opportunities for the public to comment on the remedial alternatives

2 iadudeo a brief history of the lite and the principal findillp of aite investiptions

l provides a brief delcription of the preferred altem~tive and other alternatives evaluated in the FS

4 outlines the aiteria used by EPA to propose an alternative for use at the site and briefly analyzes whether the alternatives meet each criterion and

5 presenta EPAbull rationale for its prellminary selection of the preferred alternative

To help the public parlidpate in reviewina the cleanup options for the site tbil documeot llso indudea informatioo about where interated citizens can find more detailed delcriptiona of the remedy aelectioo proceu and the alternatives under consideration for the Old Spriopield Laodlill lite

Several reportl were uaed to evaluate the alternatives presented in this Propooed lao Theae reporu can be oeparstod into three brosd aroups The lint aroup includa those report1 that were prepared for EPA by ita contractor Ebuco SeMcea lncolporatod prior to the 1988 Reconl ol Dedlloa (ROD) The oecoodaroup iodudel the two dnftJ of the 1990 FFS Th010 repor11 were prepared by IUMCORINC for two Aio portlos (Pith) Th010 reporu OOGtaio IIIUI) IIIIUDplioos aod Cgtltlllduliolll with which EPA doa DOt alee The third aod final 1f0UP of reporu iodudel the SFS aod a deltailod Uustioo of allemativea m-dum (Deuilod Evalustioo Memo) prepared by EPA aod ill ovoniabt cootrlclor Tbe SFS report Uustea the eappina l1teriJativc preoeoted in the 1988 FS baaed oo 11pdatod informalioo Tbe Detailod Evaluatioo Memo - EPAs ooadusioos _m tho IIIUIDplioos in the 1990 FFS aod on updated deltailod OYalustioo aod live analysis of olteroativa AU of these reportseao be fouDd in the Admioistntive Record

The lllbllco Role lo Eftluatlnl Remedial AltematiYU

lublk~M- BPA will bold a public infonoational meetina on July 12 1990 at 730pm

at the Sprinafield Town HaD to doscrlgte tho preferred olteroatiYo aod other altemativea Uustod by the qency The public is enoouropd to attend the middot meetinJ to hear the praentations and to ut queations

llltbliltConomIPltriDd EPA is conductioamp a JOday public oomment period from July 13 to AuJIISI

II 1990 to proride ao opportunity for public involvement in the fulol cleanup decision Durinamp the comment period the public is invited to review the Propoaed Plan 1988 FS 1990 FFS 1990 SFS the Detailed Evaluation Memo and other supportinJ documents and to offer comments to EPA

lnomiDJ llltblilt HfDiint EPA will hold an informal public hearin1 on AuJUSI 2 1990 at 730pm 1t

the Springfield Town Hall to accept oral commenta on the cleanup altemativea under consideration for the sira This bearinJ will provide the opportunity for people to comment oa the deanup plan after they bavi heard the presentations made at the public informational meetinc and reviewed this Proposed Plan Commenta made at the hearinJ will be transcribed and a copy of the transcript will be added to the Administntive Record available at the EPA Recorda Center at 90 Canal Street in Boston Massachusetts and at the information repository location listed on PliO 3

2 Old Sprinampfield Landfill Site

WriJUn Commena If after reviewinamp the inform1tion on the site you would like to comment

in writina on EPAs prefened alternative any of the other cleanup altemalives under colllideration or other isluea relevant to the lite deanup please deliver your commentl to EPA at the pubUc bearinamp or mail your written comments (postmarked no later than Aupt II 1990) to

Edward Hathaway Remedial Project Manager US Environmental Procection Acerq Wute Manapment DMaion IF1C Federal Buildinamp (liPS-CAN 1) Booton MA 02203-2211

EPA~- ofPWgtIilt Comnuna EPA will review -m11 reoeived from the public u part of the proceu

ol fltIICbiaa a final decUion oo the _ a~te -edial alternative oc -tioa of alternatigta for cleaaup of the Old Sprifieed Landlill aile EPAa final cboice ol remedy will be iaaued ill a ROD for the aile thia faiL A documoat cdada R~ 11111bull- Sumawy which IUIDIDUiral BPAa~to~ NOOived duriq tho public C0C111110111 period will be iaaued with tho ROD Oaoa tho ROD il liped bJ tho EPA apca1 Admiailtrator k will - port ol tho -Roooni-CODtaiaadoeumeatauaedbJEPAto-aremedy lor tho aile

-IUblkl__) -- thio Propooed pnMdoa oaly bull IUIIIIIIampIY of tho

a-lptioa of tho Old Spritiold Laadlill aile aed tho - shy-- the public ia OIIOIIIItOfld to - the Adminlatratlve - lor bull _ dola1led aplanatioa of the lite aed all of the nmedla1 altematlveo Wider-

n Adminlatratlve Record will be-- for It tho ~middot-EPA Reoonla Cooter middot 90 Claa1 SCreet 1Jt floor -MA 02114 (617) 573-5729 lloun Moa-Fri 830 am to 100pm aed 200pm to 500pm

IAformatioa Repaaitocy Sprifiood Public libnty Mala Street Sprilllfiold vr 05156 (amp32) 8115-3108 Houn Summer Houn Tueo-ThUB 1000 am to 800 pm JIetThurs 1000 am to 800pm Fri 1000 am to 500 pm Fri 1000 am to 500 pm Sat 1000 am to 300 pm Sat 1000 am to 100pm

EPAa Superfund Proaram Pr~ Plan 3

Site History

The Old Springfield Landfill site is located in Springfield Windsor County Vermont approximately one mile southeast of the commercial and residential oeoter of the town (see ficure 1) The site is a 27-aae parcel of land on the formu Old Will Dean Fum property The site ltUdy area il approximately bounded by Will Dean Road to the west a bowlna development to tbe north route 11 to the eu1 and resideolial property to the oouth

Mr 0-altgt Walkinl purclwed the Old Will Dean Fum in December 1943 and from July 1947 to November 19681eued 1 portion of the property to the Town ofSpringfield From 1947 throuah 1968 the Town of Springfield operated I landfill there that aaepted both municipal and induatrial wutea loduatrial wutea are believed to bave been dispoaed of on approximately 8 acres at the site and included oil tolvenll aed other induatrial wute1 After the dosure of the 1andfiU in 1968 Mr Jobn CUrtin purclwed the property aed developed 1 40 unit mobile home park the Springfield Mobile Home Eatatea whidl oovered the majority of the site The other ponioo of the site il reaideotial property owned by Mr Harold Millay

1D 1970 ae area reaideot ooticed ae odor in his well water aed ootified the Venaoat Dopartment ofeMnlomeotal CooMrvatioo Complaints by other nearby reaideoll-pted the 11110 to beplarea clriakiaa water IIIOdioo State 1uthoritiea-tly llll1yaed aed detoded ooallminOtiaa io both reoidential wella aed 1COGIIDUIIily that feodaSV Broot 1D 1981 the State ofVermoat releued tbe rsu111 of clriakiaa water ll1ldiea ODDductod withio 1 1-kilomecer (06-mile) radiua of tbe site At tbe requeat of tbe 11110 EPA bepn m-iptinJ tbe Old Sfgtriollield laDdli1l site io 1981 1D 1982 EPA added the site to tbe Superfund Naliaaal Priorillea Uat 1111kin1 it etipgtle to receive Fedenl fundi for m-lptiaa) and cleanup

lt=--- to Dote

1D 1984 u 1 reaponoo to the coatamlDatiaa found in the resideolial water middot llllpllliea EPA entered into an -twith three PRll to Ollelld the town Iter 1ioe to two private bomea In 1985 EPA bepn tbe field m-iptiaaa of the Old Sfgtriollield laDdli1l site An initial - -~~aa (RI) report wu _ for EPA io 1985 Further u-iptiaaa wete nocellll) io order to -quMiona railed by the initiaiiiiUdy Tbeae m-iptiooa reaulted io the developmea~ io 1988 of 1 auppleroeotal RI ae Eaduampot --(amp) and an FS

EPA ilaued the lint propooed deaeup plan for public comment in July 1988 Based upon comments received from the public and the State of Vennont EPA reviled the preferred alternative and _-ated the deanup into two operable anita Separatin1 the lite cleanup activities into two operable unitl enabled EPA to move forward ill its efforu to addrea one part of the contamination while proceeding ith further study oo other site contamination issues A ROD for the first operable unit wu aiampned by EPA in September 1988 The first operable unit addresses the miaratioo of contamination from the lite The remedy selected involves the collection and tratment of the contaminated leadulle exiting the western and eastern Htp1 and the extnction and treatment of p-oundwater in the sand and gravel unit under the site

4 Old Springfield Landfill Site

rlti~=t (bull I

) The ROD lbo required further atudia to co1lect additional data related to

the JeCOnd operable unit or aource control portioDt of the remedy Source control relen to addreuina 10urce1 of contaminatioa oa the lite that present a hazard or contribute to the 1pread of contamination Source controlJtudies were necessary to IIIAII1ine lhe ent of deep IVOundwater cxmtamination the feampSibility of isolating tbe wute ampom water and the nature of JUturface water flow The remedial action oplioal-ted in thiJ Propooed Plan COIIIitute the oecood and final operable unit for the aite

In Matob 1189 two PRIIeotered into aa Adminiltntive Order by Consent with EPA to perform IUdiea required by the lint ROD and to present that inlotmaiion in an FFS The field ltUdiel for the FFS were completed in F ebruary 1990

In September 1989 EPA the State ofVermont and fouc PRPbull entered into a ltXJIIIelll decree requirinalhe PRII to deaiF aad impleroeot the remedy described in lhe lint operable unit ROD The Town of Sprinafield voted in November 1189 to ra~ their portioo of the t indiJdina operatioa aad maintenance of the leachate coUectioo aad treatment sywtem EPA aad the State of Vermont ore curready reYiewina the remedial deaiF wuit plan liiODilorioc plan aad _ treatmoot plaat dilcbarp permit opplicatioo tubmilted u a reou1t ollhe cxmaent decree s-1 reoideatialU in the area IUITOOIIIdiaa the lite have been telted periodicolly AI thiJ time aoae ol the reoideatial wells telted caatain lite-related caatamibullbulltioo Agt of February 1990 all of the reoideatial U tOlled met the primuy clriakiac water qua1ily IIIDdordo eolobliobed by EPA aad the State of Vshy

Agt al June I 1990 all ol the reoideata of the sprmield Mobile Home Ellateo bad - off the oile

_ - --pdoo

- invsiptionl ba been performed the Old SpriDJfie1d Undfil1 lite - 1912 ladt u-iptioo bu oupplemeated the informatioo collected bymiddot the preYioua m-iptlons To date poundwater moaitorina U have been iaotalled in 51 locationamp to determine the qua1ily aad Dow of undwater Many ooi1 have been collected aad telted for contamination The fiodinp of - iorlooliptiooa ore IUIIUIIarired below

I -Soli Qao11tr Four - oreu wwe deocnbed in the 1181 -lptioo roporU (- fiaure 2) ~ore oreu where dri1lini IOWIIled Mdaaco of buried WUieo Further -lptiool ba Jed thatshyar- 1 il DOt a aipificant IOWCe of wuce or coatamination Wute areu 2 3 aad 4 are dearly the major katioal of 10il contamination at the aite Wute oreu 2 and 3 ore ravines filled with 6400 aad 72000 cubic yards relpOCtively of ooataminated wute and ton Waste area 4 is not a filled n~ but iiiDOIC likely a ~erieamp of trenches dua for waste dilpoal Wute area 4 hu aa estimated volume of 42SOO cubic yards ofcontaminated waste and toil Ihe wute areu contain both iDdustrial and municipal waste Volollle erpa1c __ (VOC) --u Mp11k _a (SVOC) ~ poiJqd1c -1c IIJltI- (PAIIJ) and poldllorlnlle4 blphentl (PCIIJ) bave been identified in the soils of the three major waste areu Waste areu 2 and 3 are mostly unsaturated which

EPAs Supecfund Propam Proposed Plan$

~

lti~lbulltmiddotrr ( bull f IbullI

I II

means that the majority of the wute il above the water table Waste area 4 ia mostly saturated with the water table at the pounds surface for most of the year

GIOaDdwater QuaUty and Flow One of the prime objectives of the recent FFS wu to obtain a better definition of aroundwater Oow Each of the three major waste ueu bu a different Bow l)ltem The amount of water tlowiDi ia10 and W oacb wute area II important because this water can draw coataminantllrom the - areu iaiO deeper aroundwater l)lleml Many of the potential deanup oltemativa focul on ways to reduce the Dow of water into the wute ueu

The aroundwater contamination at the Old Springfield Landfill site II primarily located in

the aoa below and ckJwltiraclieot of the three major wute dilpolal areu the sand ud pvel wPt wbicb runs underaround ampom waste area 3 to the western - neu- Brook Road and the weatbered ~ between the aite and the Bllct Riow

Wute orea 3 _ 10 be the moot Mrioul of IIJOUOdwater ooatemjnetion while wute areu 2 IDd 4 allo contain aipificant levels of ooatemjnetjon The water il cootamiaaced primarily by voea

J RaiafaD and onowme11 the oouno of about 60 -t of the

waterlllleriq wute areul 3and 4 Moot of the water W wute orea 4 lows into wute area 3 Tbil COilDfiClioa muat be taken into account wbeo wiaa claaup oltemativa for wute area 3 The majority of the water 2 and 3 - out the loochato - 10 the The W water (15 10 30 percent) - deeper ia10 the UIICierlyinl aoila and bodroct The bullnd and pavoi uoit tnnltlllla _ of this coataminatod wateriO the- a1oaJ- Brook Rood wltile the reot- ia10 the weotbered bedrock and teoiOward the Blocl River

~olSiteiUib

Ia 1188 EPA prepared an EA for the Old Sfgtrinllield Landfill site The EA identified _-pathways throulh wtUch the public could potentially be exposed to tome of the contaminants of conoem at the Old Springfield Landfill site CUrrent apoaure pathways include inhalinamp VOCs released to the air from leachate 1eep1 or landfill ps emissions and dlrect contact with contaminated soil If the site contamination il left untreated there could be potential future adverse human health effects from lonamiddotterm exposure to site contaminants Potential future risb ampom the site in the future include

uetion of contaminated JrOUldwater lonamiddottenn exposure to PCB and PAll contamination in the 10il from handlina or inaestion of the soil and inhalation of contaminants in landfill ps

6 Old Spriaafield Landfill Site

Actual or threatened releasea of bazardouiiUbatancea from this site if not addressed by the preferred alternative or one of the other active measure considered may present a current or potential threat to public health or the environment

For a complete explanation of riab poled by contamination at the Old Sprinjlield landfill aile pleue refer to the 1988 EA and FS both of which are avwble at the infonnation repository at the Sprinlfield Public Library In addition the 1990 FFS containamp a reviled risk ~~~ea~ment Ibis risk uaeument wu not properly prepared and is not appropriate for evaluating alternatives (see the Detailed Evaluation Memo for a more in-depth analysis of this risk assessment)

Proposed Cleanup Objectives and Levels

When the action described in the first ROD il implemented the risk from potential espoaure to the air emiuiona from the leachate seeps will be prevented Once the leachate collection l)ltem il in place no contaminated IWface water will be in contact with the air The implementation of the action delaibed in the first ROD will ooly partially addreu the IJOundwater rilb and will not reduce the rilb auociated with direct cootact or 1andfiU emiaiona The second operable unit Meb to addreu the rilb wn from direa 00111ac1 with oontaminated aoil inhalation of laDdfill pa and iqatioa of contaminated water

UJiaamp the information ptbered from aile IIUdieo and other technical documeotl EPA identified rentedial reoponae objectivs for the deanup for the Old Sprinpeld Landfill lite The deanup objecdveo are lilted below

- the 1ealtbinJ of aoU contamlnantl to the IJOUndwater Prevent the m9ation of concaminated lfOUIdwlter to the rest oftheWW Prewsnt contact with contaminated 10D or leachate that may

Prevent further miantion of contaminated JrOUndwater offaile Prevent the uncontrolled emiuion of landfill paes containing hazardous lllbotanceo

~middotmiddot- shy

To meelt theoe objectives EPA hu -gtlilhed site-specific tlrJOlt cleanup leYoJs that will be protOctive of public health and the environmenL The deanup Ieveii for lfOUIKiwater were presented in the fint ROD The contaminated IJOundwaler lhall be treated to meet Muimum Contaminant Levels (MCU) at the leachate 1eep1 and at the auaction wells oo-aite MCU are the standards used to determioe the leYel to which a particular contaminant must be reduced to ensure adequate protection of current and future public health The source control operable UDit lhould uaist in the achievement of the campeanup levels for aroundwater by preventinamp the continued contamination of JfOundwater from contamina in the The ooune control remedy should abo be desianed to prevent exposure to landfill au emissions and contaminated soDs that represent an unacceptable cancer risk

EPAs Superfund PIOpam Proposed Pbn 7

EPAs Preferred Alternative

EPAa oe1ection of lhe preferred deonup lllenlative for lhe Old SprioJield Landfill lite u doocribod in thia Propooed Pion II tbe _ of a comprehenlive evaluatioo and ocreeoina pltD~ The 11118 FS 1990 FFS and 1990 SFS for the lite were conducted to identify and analyze lhe lllenlativea conaidered for addreuinamp tbe of taminatioo a1 tbe lite The Detailed Evaluatioo MemopnwideoEPAafurlhermiewoftho- lb-documeotl~ tho altemativea cooaideted u well u tho- and criteria EPA used to 1WT0W the ill of potolltial remedial altemativea to adclna the of oootaatinatioo (Foe dotaiil oo EPAbull acreminc metboclolotiY - Seclioo 3 of the 1988 draft FS) The oiJowiai aecUona ~ the pnfoned lllerDativeand the other altemativea thai EPA aaalyzed in detaiL

EPAI preferred alternative ftJr 10t1rC0 -ltJJ oooailtl of the followinJ ooatpOIIOOII

I Cappins wute areu 2 3 and 4 2 -and puaive su colleclioa ayaiOIItl 3 Freacbdraina 4 Side dope llabilizatioo

middot Souno -trolshy6 lllllilgtltiooal-to-lctfulureliteUIO 7 -of tho elr-of tbe remedy

The followins II a detailod diacullioG of acb compoeeot

I A mulli-layw cap of ttaiUnl andor tplbolic tllalerial would bo -1 middot ill - with tho -c-amp _(RellA)_ ftJr tho-of--- to- tho areu ofmowa- dilpooaland a-c-amppna 1 and 3) The cap would reduoa tho - of - thai -- tho - by rec1ucinJ inliltratioo of rain - oc - watlaquo nmo1t The cap would allo reduce the-of- - 3-- 4 By cappins wute areu 3 and 4 tho cliaclwp of conu to the uaclerlyinJ poundwater and to tho oearby leacbate - would be reduced by about 65 to 70 pereeel Aftlaquo OOIIIInlclioo II oompletod the IUifaoe layer of tho cap would be- to proride veptative CCJyeneriDamp The cap would reduce the potential for dlrect tad with oootaatinated aoil

2 The cap would alto iDdude an actiYe PI QOIIeclioa )Item iD wute area 3 wbicb bu the lllDit lipjficant leoell of VOC and a puaive su collection tyltem for the other wuce ~ Active pa collection remove~ oootaatinated landfill su with - andor Iaiii wiUle a pusive aystem reliea 00 the natural upward 6oor of the su throup -middot~ Ou ooUection allo lcnowa u soil ventinamp would preYeDt the buildmiddotup of methane under the cap and would prevent the uocontrolled eacape of landfill suea oontainins buardoua cllemicala lbeae - would be treated to reduce the concentrations of these hazardous chemicals The treated pses would then be vented to the atmosphere

8 Old SpcinJield Landfill Site

3 A french drain would be oonstructed around waste area 4 to prevent shallow subsurface and aurfaee water from entering wute area 4 (see figures 2 and 4) AI described earlier waste area 4 il completely filled with water By preveotina the inflow of water from the lOp and the slde the water table would be loweced The freoch drain would be 15 to 25 feet underJPOund If the water collected in the french drain contaiN contaminants then it would be piped into the ludlate collection ay1tern If not it would be dilcbarpd to the eutern ~ Thil freoch drain ali with the cap would reduce the aroundwater enterinamp wute area 3 by about 26 percent A french drain would also be collltructcd along the northwestern border of wute area 3 to collect water Oowina from the plateau toward waste area 3

~

4 EPA bu detennined that the side slopes along waste areu 2 and 3 ar~ too lleep foe a multi-layer cap u required by RCRA pidarue Thus for the limited area of lleep lide alopeo IIOI1i wute areu 2 and 3 EPA hu detennioed that the RCRA huardoUI waste landfill closure requirements are not appropriate Consequently the aide a1opeo would be llampbilized to protect the cap oo the plateau and the leachate collection JY1ern and to minimize the potential foe olope collapse (aee fiampure 2) The aoa method ol aide olope llampbilization would be determined durinamp the remedial deaip

5 Souroe cootralU would be inllamplled thrauilgt wute area 3 (aee fiampure 2) to the llf1Widwater diocltarJinl from tho till into the aad and uait aad if~ the water lOWirdo tho 111oc1t Rivw

J Tbe mnctedllf1Widwater from the cootralU would be collected and trellod ia coardinatioo with the collection and treatment ay1tern dowloped for the 6nt openble uoit

6 f 1i1o would be rSricted by fencinc the area and eoourina that JlllO and local laws are _ to pteltllt lite dewllopment or fulUie bull of lilo llf1Widwater

7 Tbe lilo would be monitored durinamp and aftlaquo cap COIIIlrUclion and the elf- ol the remedy would be - f1VOfJ five yean

EPA io alto Clllllideriai the complete vatioo and dirpooal of wute area 2 n1ther than coppina and aide 1iope llampbilizatioo in lhio areo EPA would shylikely diopooo of the vated material by pladnJ it in wute area 3 clepeodinc on wbether RCRA land dirpooa1 reotrictiona apply Thil option may proYe to be leu aive than llampbilizinamp and cappinJ the area

Ettimtltod limltfordarnlllld- J ttJJSyean Ettimtltod plttiott of cgtplllllion JD-t- lifotinw for -eria1 minimum of JO yean for 11lt1lt1U CMI1ol Wltb Illlt lmllmmi of Illlt landfill would COIItinult until

0 ~

lGM0 (IgtM

i~ -ltM Mltr o illr

SM

r r

EPAs Superfund Prm Proposed Plan 9

I ~ I

) no haztudouJ chmtiaJJJ an tUtlaquoted in 1M p EstimoudloQI construction optnUion and~=t $8600000 If thlt option ir uslt~~ $7900000

(X)SIS AU anNATED AT NBT PRESEHI VALUB WKlOI IS THB AMOUWI OP NONBY NICISSAIYTO ssctIUTHB PRONISB OP PlmJRB PAYNBNT OR SBRIIS OF PAYNBNI11 AT

AN ASSUNIID INI1UlRfJ RATB A RATB OP 10 PBilCIJPr(l POl 30 YBAltS WAS USBD Urf 111BSB CALCUlATIONS

Other Alternatives middot Evaluated

The public il invited to comment DOt only on the preferred cleaaup ollemative but abo oo ibe otber 10 ooune oootrol ollemativea tbat EPA Uuated ill detail llch of tbaoe ollemativea ia doaribod brielly below A more dotailod doocriptioll ofiOWCII oootrol oltemativea I tbtouP 5 cao be ouad in tbe 1188 FS A_ dotailod evoluation o _urlte oootrollilemativea 6 tbtoqb II C1D be found ill tbe 1990 draft FFS and in tbe Detailed Evaluation Memo The Detailed Evaluation M abo oootains a U analyaia of li1emativea I tbtouP II The I990 SfS provide~ additionol dotail oe tbe cappiDa alteraatlwo oriclnaDY doaribod ill tbe 19118 FS

-1 No AcdM Thil ollematigte wu evoluated ill dotail in tbe FS to u a buoliae lor comparison with tbe other remeclial altemativea under - UDder tbia alternative no treatmeat or ooetaiament of aoi1 or ooetamination would oaur and no elan would be made to -let poteatial - to lire oootamiaanta The oely - auociated with thb alteraatlwo would be tbe coot of tbe ~ miowl required lor an altematigte tbat-- ill plaoo

-- --~ Mlnlmwrto(J(J_n--~--COlt $23000

- 2 CApping Frmch Drain GGI Cdllaquodon S)ortanr Sltgtwyen Coolrol Wlllr lllld Sdo Slope-- Thia ollematigte ia tbe preetred oltematigte and il dilcuoaod under EPAbull Preetred Altematigte oe papo 8-10 o tbia documentAshy 3 0-liiu lAndJUI of~ Solidi Thil oltemaM would iavolve tiiCIVItinJ waste and placiDa it ia a 2-- to _acre landfill to be CDIIIUUtted in tbe northern portion o tbe mobile home port The landfill would be built to opocilicationo outlined in RCRA tbat requite a double liner beoeatb tbe waste and other precaution~ to ensure that contuninantl do not leach out of the landfill Oooe tbe oootaminated waste material hu been placed in tbelandill tbe area would be capped u dacribed in tbe preetred oltemaM lt- pa 8-10~

The amount ofwubullbull removed would depend on tbe tel o cleanup EPA seeks to achieve at the lite To achieYe a minimal reduction in the potential foe human aposure to lite contaminaots lhrouJh direct contact with the aoil EPA would have to remove at least 5300 cubic yards of wute This level of removal would not however prevent other potential riaks of exposure IUCh u human exposure to contaminanu that leach into the aroundwater To provide the hiampfiest possible level of protection EPA would have to remcwe all 142000 cubM yards of

10 Old Sprinafield Landfill Si1e

~

Contaminated waste at the site thus eliminatina all potential pathways for exposure to site contaminants The amount of protection increasea with each additional yard of wute removed

poundstimmltd time ftx daip -middot 3 to 4 poundstimmltd time opmuion 3Q poundstimmltd totaCOIUt7Ulttlon opltmt1on Gild~ cost would WliJ tkpending 011 tlu of lt1IltIIVGUd Gild ligtndfUIlaquo rwmDVing tlu amount ofcOIIItllrliNUltd m IIlaquoUSDDJJ to proWie protlaquotDh tqUIIl to thot proWdltd by tu pnfeTtd olllttrtl1ltw would cost an utlnt4llaquol $240110000

Altemattvt 4 OnSJU lndnoation Thil alternative would involve excavating waste and buminamp it at very hiamph temperatura to destroy contaminants Air pollution Control devices on the incinerator would siplificantly reduce the risks to public health and the environment from contaminated emisaions released durinamp incineration The contaminated uh produced durinamp the incineration u well u wute items IUdt u appliancea that are too larJe or that are otherwise unsuitable for incinerltion would be placed in an onmiddotsite RCRA landfill as described in alternative 3 Abo u with alternative 3 the amount of waste excavated and treated by iacinentioo Jd depend oa the level of cleanup punued by EPA A detaDed Ulllylil of -1 cleanup _ iJ praeoled in the 1988 FS

UtlloWal ttmtxdafampn COIUt7Ulttlon ondindnltnltoropmUion 4 to 5yoan --ftxldndflllopltlflliolrJO-total lt1101 _--cost would Wll)dqgtGidinf tluoflaquoltwl~tlu amount of --_to JIIVIdl _ tqWJI to- pltrWidM1 by the tnfltmd- would COli - $1994011000

Allomolllot 5 lnsllllt lllrljlaltlooL This altemathoe would require tina COiltlalinated wute and placiq it in on-lite trencbes for vitrification treatment middot E1ecuodoo-lt be plaoed in the wute- to mel~ or vitrify the wulte The -moly hiab temperahtnl _led Jd dellroy many of the conlatttinanll aacl oolidify any remainiq coa-uatioo into a pullke JUbotanoe The tteochea -lt be covored with liD aacl ooeded to provide a tne OOYerinr

--ftxdafampnCOIUfnlclionondopltlflliolr 4to20yoan-total lt1101 _--cost would Wll)dqgtGidinf 011 t1u of vlmfiMI rwmDVing tlu amountofcOIIItllrliMtltd - _ to JIMIde _ tqUIIl to pltrWidM1 by tlu pnfefTtdollwmGtiYe would cott an- $129700000

II8ASe NOJ1 111AT 1HS C05r BSTINATIS POll ALIlaNA11VBI 6 THIIOUOH 11 AIUl TAICIN

PilON ntB 1990 PPS PIIPAIIJD BY aiNCOil INC 1IN8 BSTINATIS WEill ADIUSl1D 10

lUPIl-a fIA JUD0NBNT ~~ OIEitAnoH AND MAINTBHANCI SOIEDULBS

Ak 6 Fltlldltg Gild Cowring ofCOittamUtalltd Sollt This alternative would involve ooverinaaoill that present an unacceptable cancer risk associated with direct contact and riskJ from incidental inpstion of contaminated 10ll This alternative would involve placinamp a 2middotfoot cover of fill over an area of approximately

EPAa Superfund Propm Proposed Plan 11

) U aaea A 3500-Coot cbaia link feoco would bo CClllllr1lctltlc around- areu 2 3 aod 4 aod tho euteru _ 10 preveat _ 10 the aile areu of coocem Nothina would bo doae 10 atabilizelho lido llcpea Swfalte dniaap controla uld bo UIOd _uot of- area 4 10 protect the intqrity of the laquoNor

--fordalplllld lywr

------ Mlnlmwnof]()shy--fflonctllt ~000

A1llmordw 7 F- buoollotlolt ofbull SGwlti C011tngt1 WU Gild Cowrlnr of ~Soil This ollemalive would iDdude Ill of tho- of ollemalive 6 but would abo lndude tho ioolollatioo of 1 cootrol U The cootroiUwould bo dais10_~twaterfrom hound aod uall uodoraatb - area 3 This well would pump water into the -t oyttemCClllllr1lctltlc u put of the lint~ unit

__for ____ ]()_-1mefordalpllllld l Sto2_

--fflon-ctllt 1700000

-1 F l-ofs-oCootngtIWIII 1-shy_ W-AN J bullCowrlnfof~m Oualolo 11-AMl l1tia -wouldladudo Ill ol tba-ol-7 but would alloladudo tba p bulldon ol1 ooil- - oyt~em 10 - voea from tba -~in-anal ~talyI01025--

- would bo - Some ol - - would shy-- Tbe--- bJ the ooil- wwld bo- 10 - tbo - ol Olllllllaiautl iato tbo air It lo - 911 10 95 -ottbo_ID_ualil- Soli--would - tbo-ol- Olllllllaiautlllill iD tbashy

--fordalpl_ l Sto2___ --for-- JtolS-forltJII-CitnlcdoorJ()_for

-- fflon lllld-ctllt JlSOOOOO-9 F buoollotloltofos-oCootngtIWIII CdpplnfofW AMI J lllld Cowrlnr of~ Sollm ~ - AMl This ollemalive would iDdude f I aource cootrol well aod I 05 aae laquoNor over cotllomioatod ooil oullido - area 3 u deocribod in alteroalive 7 It would abo iDdude tbo illllalladon of 1 RCRA cap oo tbo 25 aae plateau portioo of wuto area 3 Tbe cap would lndudo 1 puoiYe p1 collectioo oyttem and troatmoot of tbo collectedshy

-- -2toJshy--foropetaliclomiddot J()shy

-- uionlllldctllt $1900000


AU 10 Ftlldng nsw~Ji~Jion of bull Sowa Control w~ OJpping of Waste A=~ 3 and 4 and Covtring of ConmrliniJied Soil OWde of Waste A=~ 3 and 4 This alternative would include all of the elemenLI of alternative 9 but would involve the placement of a RCRA cap on wute area 4 An additional 22 aaes would be capped

Emnroud time for daigrl and CONI1IUIion 2 to J yun EllimltJud time for operaliolt 30 Emnroud total CtiiiSt7UCtion OJ1Iiltgtn Gild~ cost $2800000

~ 11 Ftlldng Insw~Ji~Jion of bull Sowa Control w~ Copping of w-AnG 3 WiJh PnmJu Slwry w~ Gild Covtring OfContaminaud Soil OuJside of WGIIc treG J This alternative wOuld iDdude all of the elementl of alternative 9 but would allo include the design and construction of a aluny wall around the perimeter of wute area 3 The wall would be a 900-loot-lonamp 45-loot-deep solid barrier reducina aroundwater flow into waste area 3

- timefordaign Gild-middot J - -forbullPbullbullbulltion 30yunmiddot--Ct111St7Uetion ond~cost $2600000

S11111mary of the Comparative Analyals of Alternatives

EPA _ nine criteria to evaluate each remedial alternative retained for clocallod aaalyaia middotThe nine criteria are tued to oelect a remedy that meets the --ltltpropomgoallofprotectinJbumaa baaltband the-~ protection uver time and llllllimiziaamp Udtreated- Dellaltiou of tba alaa criteria and a IUIIIItW) of EPAamp evaluation of the allemadv llliaa the alaa criteria are provided below

I o-l_oHH-IIIttldv~addceaampabowan - u a wllole would protect b- baaltb and the L Thil iacludeamp - of bow public baaltb and eaviroameatal rilb are _ty elimiaated reduood or coatrollod tbroupl treatmOtl~ - coatrolamp or iaotiMioaalcoatrolo middot

The~~~~~~~the--ofcoa-wtion at the lite would provide lor overall protaetion of buman bealtb and the -t bypreventinadirectcoatactwitbcoa-wted aoibpreventina the inhalation ol -~~~ in landfill au and reducinc the infiltration and UllderJround Jniampration ol water to prevent the continued leacltinamp ol -~~~ into the twater Altenuadv 3 tbroupl 5 would abo provide ~ protection Alt~tive I the no action alternative would aot aatily this criteria nor would altemadv 6 tbroup II Alternativeamp 6 and 7 would not addr the potential riampt uaociated with the inhalation ol landfill ps emissions lor tho eatiro lite Altemativea 9 and II would not addrea the potential risk from inhalation of landfill ps emissioru from wute areu 2 and 4 Alternative 10 would not addrea the potential risk from inhalation of landfill pses Crom wuce area 2 Alternative 6 would not reduce or control the risk posed by inptinamp contaminated sroundwater or prevent the leachins or soil contaminants into the aroundwater Alternatives

EPAo Superfund Prm Proposed Plan 13

) 7 lhrOUJb 11 would not pceveot tJgt iDliltralioo ofwater wbicb could cootact cootaminated wute or IOil IDd cany the contamination into the srowuJwamplltr

2 Complianu - Appialblt kWllll ApptopritiU 1llqulnmtn(ARARr) addr- whether or DOl a remedy compliea with all JUte and Federal eavironmentaland public bealtb lawa and requiremeoll that apply or are relevant and _nate to the coaditiona aod cleanup option1 at a opecific aile U at1 AllAR CUIIIOt be met the analylia muat provide the arouada for invokinJ a Jlatutory waiver

RCRA bazardoua -laadlill clooute requiremenll are ao ARAR for asubotantial portion of the aource trol remedy EPA bu determined that tbeae RCRA requiremeoll are relevant atld appropriate to theedial action The 11188 FS ideotified the - of RCRA lilled wute at the aile There are alao - diapooed of atld fouod at the lite limi1ar to RCRA buardous wutea In addition objectiveo of the remedial action ouch u prevenlinJ theleadlinJ of ooi1 cootaminaotl to the JrOUDdWIIltr and pceveotinJ public cootact with cootaminated ooi1 or leachate that may pceaeot a riallt are limilar to the purpooeo of the RCRA bazardoua wute laadlill clooure requir-11 Aoy aberaative requirinJ a cap or would be limi1ar to 1aedlill clooure activitiea required Wider RCRA

-middot EPA bu determined tbar cawitgtl accordinJ to RCRA _ would 1101 be _nate foe the tide tlopeo 00 shyareu 2and 3

1bo preferred aberaative would - all ARARa AllU 3 bullbull and 5 would alao bulllilly ARAlia A1tomalivoo land 6 throuJh II would 1101 latlafy ARARa beca- they would aoc bulllilly the RCRA requiremeoll for bazardoua wute 1andli11 clooure

3 ~E~fllld-refento theabilityofaoaltemative to mainllin reliable proleCdoo at bumaa bealtb and the enviroomeot

time- the dooaup - beeo met WJth the al the 00 - aberaative and altemativeo 6

lhrOUJb 11 all of the other aberaativeo that receMd detailed evaluation would pnMde for 1oq-lerm elf- For altemativeo I 2 (the pcefened alternative) and 6 throuJh 11 the wute would remain in place The kgtofltenn eftectiveoea of the pcefened alternative is dependent upon the pcoper installation aod maintenance of the cap Altemativea 4 and 5 if tully implemented would ptOyenide areater lonJmiddot term efectlven- becaute the wute would be treated or removed

4 IIMiualoto ofT~ Mobillly V - 7MUment are lhree principal meuure of the overall performance of an alternative The 1986 atnendmenll to the Superfuod Jlatute empbalite the~ whenever pltgtaJble EPA Jbould select a remedy that usa a treatment process to pennanently reduce the level of contaminant toxicity al the lite the mobility or spread of contaminants away from the IOUne of contamination and the volume or amount of contamination at the site

Only alternative~ 4 and 5 would achieve a signifiCIInt reduction in volume mobility and toxicity throuah treatment Alternative 8 would

14 Old Sprinpield Landfill Site

) reduce the volume of contaminltion throuampb treatment in only the unsaturated zone The active au collection system included in the preferred alternative would also achieve tome reduction in the volume of the VOCI in the unsaturated zooe by carbon treatment of collected pses Altemativ 71hroup IIIUld lhe preferred alternative would all reduce lhe mobility ud volume of oontaminanta iD the deep aroundwater throuamph the UM of aource control well(a) which would pump Water to the leachate collectioo IUld treatmeot oyotem

s Shottwm EfflaquotiveM refen to the likelihood of adverse impact on human bea1tb or the environment that may be poled durinamp the construction and implementation of an alternative uotll deaaup JOampb are achieved

All of the alternatives recained for detailed evaluation would be effective in the short-term Because of the potential for contaminant releue durinamp any acavation activities spocia1 eqiocerina precautions would have to be taken to minimize the potential for contaminant emiuions and ensure obort tenD procectioo of worken IUld reoidelltJ durinamp OCNIIIrUlttioo ICiivWeo The preferred alternative would be oompleted in a oborter time frame than altemativeo 3 lhroup S Altemativeo 6 and 7 would be -ted in I oborter time frame than lhe other alternativea Noae of lhe - that would lhe- in place would reoult in lhe cleanup of lhe oile in a time frame lliFificaady oborter than any ocher alternative

6 ~ refen to lhe teclmical and adminiluative feuibillty of an lllonlative indudinamp lhe availlhilily of materiab and aervicoa needed to ~lheolteraative

Tho - (allenwM 2) could be implomMted --- lnacb dnJaa IUld pa oollocoioa _are OOIIIIDOIIIy uaod pnclicoa Allorutive S would iavolwelhe uae of an innovative (IIHial vilrlllcotiaa) that would require ltIreful deaiaa atudiea Sol vopgtr - (olteraative I) baa oot - _ted for -ofmuaidpol aolid- and would require a piloiiiUdy Alllhe other - could be imjillmmted Side alope atabilization would be -to implement ill _ of lhe aile

7 Coot lodudeo lhe capital (up-froot)- of implementinJ an alternative lhe -ofoperatinJ IUld maintainiq lhe alttive over the loaamp term IUld net -t_ of both capitaiiUld operation and maintenance-

Tbe capital operation IUld mainteaance and toll - for each alternative are provided u part of lhe W deocriptiona of EPAa PnfaTed Alternative IUld Other Alttiveo Evaluated The preferred alt- would provide for the beat balance of 0011 aDd protection

8 Sltlil Acapance addreua whether bued on its review of the lite documeotJ IUld Propoaed Plan lhe State coocun with oppoo or hu oo comment oa the alternative EPA is propolinc u the remedy for the site

A1 lhil time lhe StJte of Vennont aupportJ EPAs preferred alteroative u deocribed in lhil Prcpooed Plan Formal concurrence is apocted followinamp the public comment period

EPAa Superfund Jgtroanm Propoaed Plan IS

I I

~ I

) 9 CommwUty Acaptanu addreuea whether the public CODCUtl with EPAs

Prcpoaed Plan Community aaeptanlte ol this Proposed Plan will be evaluated based on comments received at the upcomina public meetinp and durinamp the public comment period

01 the nine criteria protection ol public bealth and complianal with aU ARARI are considered the threabold requiremeDta that all remodiet must meet EPA balanceo the trade-olli am001 altemativeo with reapeclt to Jonamiddotterm elfectivenao and permanence redlldion ol loidcity mobility or volume tbroup treatmen~ obon-term ellectiveoeaa implernentability and 0011 Slate and community coooems are considered u modifyina aiteria factored into a final balaociDa of all criteria to select a remedy Cooaidention of state and community commentl may prompt EPA to modify aspecta of the preferred alternative or decide that another alternative considered provides a more appropriale balance

EPAs RaUonale for Proposinamp the Preferred Alternative

Baaed on curreet information and analylia or the atudiea and technical data avoilable no this lite EPA beliooa that the preferred alternative lor the Old Sprinlfield laDdlill lite COIIIillent with the requiremenu or the Superfund Jaw and ill -u opecificaUy Secline 121 of CERCLA and 10 the bullent proclicable the - ~ Plu (NCP) Eaopt lor alternative I and - 6 tbroulh II aU or the other altemativeo pniODted in this Prcpoaed Plan pngtCeiS human bealth and the eaviranment and aatioly ARAlia Tbe pnferred altemative wu oelecled _ k aould bo mon readily implementedand bo more -elfeetive than the other- that aatiolied the twq threabold crileria Alao in EPA1 iumatine the preferred altemative -the bolt bolance 1m001 crileria uoed by EPA 10 evaluale the altematioa Tbe pnferred aJtemative provide and -- or bumaa boallb and eevinlament lllaia aD Fedonl and ARARI - the mobility or conllminantl in the Ulllalllrated zone and utilize pormanent JOiulionJ 10 the muimum -t pncticable Tbe preferred altemative bo CODJiJteot with the NCP preference 10 uae controll 1UC11 u coatainmee~ for wute that pooea a relatiwly low threat or when treatmeat II impncticable Tbe prefemd altemative may also -a the opention and mainteaance COlts for the lacbate collection and treatment system

The preferred alternative would alleviate the risks usociated with direct contact with aoD 1od inhalation of landfill iiJel It would also 11tiJly the ARAR for cbure of a landfill containina hazardoUI wutea An active pa coUoction I)ICem would l1lo reduce the volume of contaminants in the unsaturated zone It would alao reduce the miptioo ol landlillp101 tbrouJh the lido slopea that would not bo covered with an impermeable cap Tbe lrench draina would belp prt poundnter Dow from contctinamp the wastes and would be very important in reducina the moblllty of contaminants in waste area 4 by lowfrinl the water table Tbis in tum would reduce the volume of water enterin1 waste area 3

Althoup the cost ol the preferred allernative ll JUbstanliaUy hiper lhan the other alternatives which leave the waste in place EPA believes that it provides effectiveness that is proportional to its coat EPA considers all of the components of the preferred alternative important elementamp of any plan to control the now or water into the wute areas

16 Old Springfield lJndfill Silo

For Moq Inlonnatlon

~

middot

A cap is uaually

LIUWI)o Ad

1bo ac11 aeated a opeclaltu that- into a Superfund to inveatipte aad dean up abanduned

Prcpooed Plan 17

U you have lUI) quatioo about tbe lite oc would like mare illfonnation you may caD or write to

Edward Hathaway Remedial Project Manapr us loviroomeatal lroloclion lluanlouo w DMiioa (HPS-CAN I) JFI( Fedonl Jiuildinamp - MA 02203-2211 (617) 573-5782

oc

Jameo Selgtutian Commllllily Relaliou Coordioator us loviroomeatal Prolectioo Publk AAain Ollioo (RPAmiddot2203) JFI( FedonlJiuildinamp -MA 02203-2211 (617) 565-3423

GLOSSARY A ol rodlt oc ooil _ tbe pouad _ caa IIIIPIYshyol poutlllwalor to - aad opriap Aquifon bo ol driatiai shy

1bo layer of rodlt located _ tbe pillly depooited ooil aad rodlt uacler tbe -powgtda aurfoce Bedrock can be either aolid oc lnctured (cradtod) lnctured bedroclt can aupport aquifen

c A QOIVel placed over a hazardous wute facility to prevent surface water and rain water from comina into roatact with the buried contaminants made from aynthetic linen or clay

~- - _ ~lloo ao4 (CERCLA) _ A Fedonllaw puted in 1980 and modllied in 1986 by the Superfund Amendmenll aad Reauthorization Act (SARA) tnut fund commonly known u or uacontrolled buardoua wute lites Under tbe pnllrllll EPA can either I) pay for site deanup when partia raponsible for the contamination cannot be located or are unwillina or unable to perfonn 1he work or 2) take lepl action to force

EPAa Superfund Propm

partiea raponaib1e for lite cootaminatioo to dean up the lite OJ pay back the Federal pemmeel for lhe - of lhe cleanup

~-(EA) A lludy coodueled 10 delennine lhe poleeliolpreoenl and fvlure riJb 10 lhe public beallh and lhe environmenl pooed by lhe aile

FIIIWI) Slud7 (FS) A feuibilily lludy il a report lbal IIWIIIIWizea lhe developmenl and analylil of remedial alternatives that EPA considera for the cleanup of Superfund lites

Fnadlllnlao A melhod of oolleclinaiJOIIIIdwaler II iovolveo layina a perforalod pipe a1 lhe bouom of a trench to direct water into a colloction lfllemmiddot

Gu Colloctloa A prooodure in which landfill p1 il releued in10 lhe almOipllere uaina pipel or -IL A p1 colleclioa may iadude 1eea1meo1 of P lbal OOftlaina OOIIIamlaaniL

~ w- fouad -~~~ lhe oanhbull ourfacelhallilllporeo- maleriall oucb u IUid IOil and cracb in bodrodt Thio waler often - u a principal ol driaJdna waler

-~

A liquid hal ill lormod wbeD rain or ourface waler lillen lbrouF a landfill and - ioiO - wilh IIOIIIamiaaled - If loadlala ill DOl OOftlrolled ~ _ --andCOIIIalllina -and--middot -Na111n11J ocxutinc elemonll- fouad in IDil and waler Melalo ofconoem a1 1he

Old Sprifieed Laodfill ate borium oicbl coboll and - middot

-~Pioa(NCP) Federal nplalioo which pidollhe ~ _

~Uolt Aa ICiioa laba u ooe port of aa overall aile cleanup A number of operable urula cu be Ulod in the course of a site cleanup

ac-H- (PAllo) lol)ltydic aramalk hydrocartgtono are orpnic oompoundl lbal are commonly compunentl of foail fuels Some are mown to cause canocr

~lllpiMoJII(PCBI) PCBo ate a family ol orpnic ~ uaod in declricallranlformen lubricanll and - PCBo are ealremely penilleal in lhe environmeel and do 001 break down lnloleoa bannful sublla EPA banned lhe uae of PCBo in 1979 because

II Old SprioField Landfill Sile

middotJooa-term expoaure to PCamp cao caUICI liver damqe and other adverse human health effectamp

PaloDdiiiJ _ - (PIUa) Any iDdMdual ccxporatioo oc munidpalily who peralel tranJpons or arranaes foe the dilpooal of buardoua - at a Superfund lite u well u any party who owoed oc _ted the lite

_ olllodolo (llOD) A lepldocumeot liFod by EPA that dooaibeamp the deanup action or remedy oelected foe a Superfund lite oc portloa of a S_rwd lite The ROD indudea the bull foe EPAbull dlolco of the remedy public comment on the propoaed remedi and the eRimated- of the remedy

a-Miol~ Remedial lltemativa are optiooo evoluated by EPA to reduce the and of COIItaminantt at a Superfund lite in order to meet health hued cleaaupplt_(RI) Tho RI It a -y report of the infarmatioG cnllocted the nature and -t of - found at a s__ lite the pngthlomt that theand --It _ _the typet II cleaaup optlou that ue developed in the PS

-~--Ad(8CIIA)

__ Alodonllowthat_a_to_bazardout _

_ofto~ lllolow afeandshy_ to ho ___and dltpoolac ofshy---GnMUd z-ltt tbo t compoaed of tand and duouah which water- eoaily Tho tand and llllll at the Old Spriqtlold Laadllll lite nw from undolt - 3 to the- loochate- at Sllrool Rood

~ 1-- -bere twater- to the _r twface and there may ho vittie water llow

s-1-Volodlo 0rJoU ~ (SVOC) Cbemicol _ -pooec~ primarily or carbon and middot hyc~roaen that do not evoporate - SVOC indude ouch oubotanca u pellicidea and PCIII Some SVOCa are kDowa to caUM cancer

Bodiel of water oa the eattha llldace that are apoted to air auch u atreams-wshyriven lat and oceana

EPAbull Superfund Propm Propoaed Plan 19

Vololllo OopU ~ (VOC) A - o1 _ compouado ODIIIpCIIOII priawily ol corlgtoo aad bydropo hat -bylholr leodeDcy _ (laquo WllatiiiM) inkgt the air from - oo11 voca include -haton coalained in~to~wau aad cloolliDc llullk s-e voca ue- cauoo __ Upper- ol -

20 Old Sprinafield Landfill Site

WEATHERSFELD

CAVNDISH

middotmiddot - middotmiddotshymiddotmiddotshy

GRAFTON

- middotmiddot shy TOWN-shy-- RO~AYI

t N

I

OLD SPAiaELD LANDFU SITE

FIGURE 1 SITE LOCATION MAP

---

---- arm

--WASTE AREA 1y-ARY

I

bull-

_ --IITATD

I

WASTE AREA

middot--4middot I

J

middott N

I

OLD SIRIQ=EU) LANDFIL SITE

FIGURE 2 SITE MAP

---- P8ICM-shy

n Old SprinsJield Landfall site middot

24 Old Springfield L1nltlfill Site

OLD 8PMIOF1ELD LANDFIL SITE

FJQURE 4 FRENCH DRAIN

DETAL

110T TO

Mailing List Additions

If JOOI-JOII--bullto be pllced oa die 0111 Spriqlleld laDdliD SilO Mdlllamp Lilt_IIUootaad-dlilfonato

us--~ -- shy~olllbUcMoin(RPA-2201) Job P Jraoedr Nal llodldlq -~-lt- 0221Do2111

~---------------------------------------shy~ ------------------------------------~shy- ------------------------------- ------

UNITmSTATD ~AI PIIOnCI10N AOINCY Dlloooi__AIJOHNmiddot--middot -IIUILIIINQ K-_--lilA- ~ IIAIIACIIIMST1S QZ20So2211

_

u-middot

barcode 580840

barcodetext SDMS Doc ID 580840

FINAL PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY OLD SPRINGFIELD LANDFILL SITE

SPRINGFIELD VERMONT

SPRINGFIELD TOWN HALL SPRINGFIELD VERMONT

JULY 12 1990 7 30 PM

IlllRODOCriOM

On July 12 1990 the us Envi ronaental Protection Aqency (EPA) in conjunction with the Vemont DepartMnt of Enviroruaental Conaervation (Vl DEC) held a public inforutional etinq at the Sprinfield Town Hall in Sprint~field Veraont concerning the Old Springfield Landfill Site The purpoae of the atil9 vaa to preant the findift9bull of the Pocuaecl Peaaibility Study and the Propoeecl Plan for aite raadiation and to anawer queationa froa the public Specific topicbull included an overview of the Supertund procaaa ancl how it relatebull to the Old Sprinfield Landfill aitet deaoription of the aite t definition of each of EPAbull nine evaluation criteria1 4eacription and juatification of BPAa preferred reaeclial altarnativer preaentation an4 copariaon

~~=iit~~nasibulllniro~ ~11[r-~bulld~ua~-= COIIIIampftt period The aCJenda preaented at the _tirtCJ ia attached aa Appendix A AppencSix B ia the Propoee4 Plan

Approxtately 35 people attendS the etiNJ inclwSin aeveral local nevepaper reporterbull The BPA vaa npreaented by David Webetar the Maine and Vezwmt lupertund section Chief 1 Bdward Hathaway the Reaedial Project Jlanaqerr Karoia Laael the Site Attorney t and Ja lebaatian the Counity Relatione Coordinator The State of VelIIOnt vaa repreaented by Thoaaa lloye Diane Conrad and Bill Ahearn froa the Ver110nt Departent of lnvironental Conaervation (VTDEC) 1 and Conrad saith froa the Verwgtnt Office of the Attorney General EPA bull contractor Ebaaco servicebull Incorporated vaa repreaented by Cynthia Hanna The etiftCJ bec)an at approxiaately 7 35 PM

The Metift9 waa approxi Mtely three houra lonq 1 the preaentationa laated approxiaately an hour and were followed by an approxiMtely two hour quaation and anaver period Follovinq the foraal queati on and anaver peri od the EPA and State repreaantative a ware available for inforul d i acuaaiona

David Wabatar opened the bullbulletinq by introducing the VT DEC EPA and overaiqht contractor ataff that ware praaant Hr Webster presented an overview of the Coaprehenaive Environaental Reaourca copanaation and Liability Act (CERCLA) the National Prioritiea

MEETING SUMMARY






liaaaoial




MEETING SUMMARY


I






LioigtUitr






IJirt(tr

I

MEETIKG SUMMARY




Baaltb aiaka







MEETING SUMMARY


AltarDativaa












MEETING SUMMARY

JJirt(r IbullI







U-LIUm008









MEETING SUMMARY



MEETING SUIOIARY

APPBIIDIX A


bullKEETIMG SUMMARY

AGENDA


SPRINGFIEW VERMONT

JULy 12 1990 738PM









APPDOIX B


MEETING SUMMARY


JULY 1990































Site History




lt=--- to Dote




rlti~=t (bull I






_ - --pdoo




~


I II








~olSiteiUib











~middotmiddot- shy













~








0 ~

lGM0 (IgtM

i~ -ltM Mltr o illr

SM

r r


I ~ I











~













--fordalplllld lywr










































I I

~ I









For Moq Inlonnatlon

~

middot

A cap is uaually

LIUWI)o Ad


Prcpooed Plan 17



oc













-~












-~--Ad(8CIIA)









WEATHERSFELD

CAVNDISH


GRAFTON


t N

I



---

---- arm

--WASTE AREA 1y-ARY

I

bull-

_ --IITATD

I

WASTE AREA

middot--4middot I

J

middott N

I


FIGURE 2 SITE MAP

---- P8ICM-shy





DETAL

110T TO




~---------------------------------------shy~ ------------------------------------~shy- ------------------------------- ------


_

u-middot

barcode 580840







liaaaoial




MEETING SUMMARY


I






LioigtUitr






IJirt(tr

I

MEETIKG SUMMARY




Baaltb aiaka







MEETING SUMMARY


AltarDativaa












MEETING SUMMARY

JJirt(r IbullI







U-LIUm008









MEETING SUMMARY



MEETING SUIOIARY

APPBIIDIX A


bullKEETIMG SUMMARY

AGENDA


SPRINGFIEW VERMONT

JULy 12 1990 738PM









APPDOIX B


MEETING SUMMARY


JULY 1990































Site History




lt=--- to Dote




rlti~=t (bull I






_ - --pdoo




~


I II








~olSiteiUib











~middotmiddot- shy













~








0 ~

lGM0 (IgtM

i~ -ltM Mltr o illr

SM

r r


I ~ I











~













--fordalplllld lywr










































I I

~ I









For Moq Inlonnatlon

~

middot

A cap is uaually

LIUWI)o Ad


Prcpooed Plan 17



oc













-~












-~--Ad(8CIIA)









WEATHERSFELD

CAVNDISH


GRAFTON


t N

I



---

---- arm

--WASTE AREA 1y-ARY

I

bull-

_ --IITATD

I

WASTE AREA

middot--4middot I

J

middott N

I


FIGURE 2 SITE MAP

---- P8ICM-shy





DETAL

110T TO




~---------------------------------------shy~ ------------------------------------~shy- ------------------------------- ------


_

u-middot

barcode 580840







LioigtUitr






IJirt(tr

I

MEETIKG SUMMARY




Baaltb aiaka







MEETING SUMMARY


AltarDativaa












MEETING SUMMARY

JJirt(r IbullI







U-LIUm008









MEETING SUMMARY



MEETING SUIOIARY

APPBIIDIX A


bullKEETIMG SUMMARY

AGENDA


SPRINGFIEW VERMONT

JULy 12 1990 738PM









APPDOIX B


MEETING SUMMARY


JULY 1990































Site History




lt=--- to Dote




rlti~=t (bull I






_ - --pdoo




~


I II








~olSiteiUib











~middotmiddot- shy













~








0 ~

lGM0 (IgtM

i~ -ltM Mltr o illr

SM

r r


I ~ I











~













--fordalplllld lywr










































I I

~ I









For Moq Inlonnatlon

~

middot

A cap is uaually

LIUWI)o Ad


Prcpooed Plan 17



oc













-~












-~--Ad(8CIIA)









WEATHERSFELD

CAVNDISH


GRAFTON


t N

I



---

---- arm

--WASTE AREA 1y-ARY

I

bull-

_ --IITATD

I

WASTE AREA

middot--4middot I

J

middott N

I


FIGURE 2 SITE MAP

---- P8ICM-shy





DETAL

110T TO




~---------------------------------------shy~ ------------------------------------~shy- ------------------------------- ------


_

u-middot

barcode 580840





Baaltb aiaka







MEETING SUMMARY


AltarDativaa












MEETING SUMMARY

JJirt(r IbullI







U-LIUm008









MEETING SUMMARY



MEETING SUIOIARY

APPBIIDIX A


bullKEETIMG SUMMARY

AGENDA


SPRINGFIEW VERMONT

JULy 12 1990 738PM









APPDOIX B


MEETING SUMMARY


JULY 1990































Site History




lt=--- to Dote




rlti~=t (bull I






_ - --pdoo




~


I II








~olSiteiUib











~middotmiddot- shy













~








0 ~

lGM0 (IgtM

i~ -ltM Mltr o illr

SM

r r


I ~ I











~













--fordalplllld lywr










































I I

~ I









For Moq Inlonnatlon

~

middot

A cap is uaually

LIUWI)o Ad


Prcpooed Plan 17



oc













-~












-~--Ad(8CIIA)









WEATHERSFELD

CAVNDISH


GRAFTON


t N

I



---

---- arm

--WASTE AREA 1y-ARY

I

bull-

_ --IITATD

I

WASTE AREA

middot--4middot I

J

middott N

I


FIGURE 2 SITE MAP

---- P8ICM-shy





DETAL

110T TO




~---------------------------------------shy~ ------------------------------------~shy- ------------------------------- ------


_

u-middot

barcode 580840



AltarDativaa












MEETING SUMMARY

JJirt(r IbullI







U-LIUm008









MEETING SUMMARY



MEETING SUIOIARY

APPBIIDIX A


bullKEETIMG SUMMARY

AGENDA


SPRINGFIEW VERMONT

JULy 12 1990 738PM









APPDOIX B


MEETING SUMMARY


JULY 1990































Site History




lt=--- to Dote




rlti~=t (bull I






_ - --pdoo




~


I II








~olSiteiUib











~middotmiddot- shy













~








0 ~

lGM0 (IgtM

i~ -ltM Mltr o illr

SM

r r


I ~ I











~













--fordalplllld lywr










































I I

~ I









For Moq Inlonnatlon

~

middot

A cap is uaually

LIUWI)o Ad


Prcpooed Plan 17



oc













-~












-~--Ad(8CIIA)









WEATHERSFELD

CAVNDISH


GRAFTON


t N

I



---

---- arm

--WASTE AREA 1y-ARY

I

bull-

_ --IITATD

I

WASTE AREA

middot--4middot I

J

middott N

I


FIGURE 2 SITE MAP

---- P8ICM-shy





DETAL

110T TO




~---------------------------------------shy~ ------------------------------------~shy- ------------------------------- ------


_

u-middot

barcode 580840








U-LIUm008









MEETING SUMMARY



MEETING SUIOIARY

APPBIIDIX A


bullKEETIMG SUMMARY

AGENDA


SPRINGFIEW VERMONT

JULy 12 1990 738PM









APPDOIX B


MEETING SUMMARY


JULY 1990































Site History




lt=--- to Dote




rlti~=t (bull I






_ - --pdoo




~


I II








~olSiteiUib











~middotmiddot- shy













~








0 ~

lGM0 (IgtM

i~ -ltM Mltr o illr

SM

r r


I ~ I











~













--fordalplllld lywr










































I I

~ I









For Moq Inlonnatlon

~

middot

A cap is uaually

LIUWI)o Ad


Prcpooed Plan 17



oc













-~












-~--Ad(8CIIA)









WEATHERSFELD

CAVNDISH


GRAFTON


t N

I



---

---- arm

--WASTE AREA 1y-ARY

I

bull-

_ --IITATD

I

WASTE AREA

middot--4middot I

J

middott N

I


FIGURE 2 SITE MAP

---- P8ICM-shy





DETAL

110T TO




~---------------------------------------shy~ ------------------------------------~shy- ------------------------------- ------


_

u-middot

barcode 580840




MEETING SUIOIARY

APPBIIDIX A


bullKEETIMG SUMMARY

AGENDA


SPRINGFIEW VERMONT

JULy 12 1990 738PM









APPDOIX B


MEETING SUMMARY


JULY 1990































Site History




lt=--- to Dote




rlti~=t (bull I






_ - --pdoo




~


I II








~olSiteiUib











~middotmiddot- shy













~








0 ~

lGM0 (IgtM

i~ -ltM Mltr o illr

SM

r r


I ~ I











~













--fordalplllld lywr










































I I

~ I









For Moq Inlonnatlon

~

middot

A cap is uaually

LIUWI)o Ad


Prcpooed Plan 17



oc













-~












-~--Ad(8CIIA)









WEATHERSFELD

CAVNDISH


GRAFTON


t N

I



---

---- arm

--WASTE AREA 1y-ARY

I

bull-

_ --IITATD

I

WASTE AREA

middot--4middot I

J

middott N

I


FIGURE 2 SITE MAP

---- P8ICM-shy





DETAL

110T TO




~---------------------------------------shy~ ------------------------------------~shy- ------------------------------- ------


_

u-middot

barcode 580840


APPBIIDIX A


bullKEETIMG SUMMARY

AGENDA


SPRINGFIEW VERMONT

JULy 12 1990 738PM









APPDOIX B


MEETING SUMMARY


JULY 1990































Site History




lt=--- to Dote




rlti~=t (bull I






_ - --pdoo




~


I II








~olSiteiUib











~middotmiddot- shy













~








0 ~

lGM0 (IgtM

i~ -ltM Mltr o illr

SM

r r


I ~ I











~













--fordalplllld lywr










































I I

~ I









For Moq Inlonnatlon

~

middot

A cap is uaually

LIUWI)o Ad


Prcpooed Plan 17



oc













-~












-~--Ad(8CIIA)









WEATHERSFELD

CAVNDISH


GRAFTON


t N

I



---

---- arm

--WASTE AREA 1y-ARY

I

bull-

_ --IITATD

I

WASTE AREA

middot--4middot I

J

middott N

I


FIGURE 2 SITE MAP

---- P8ICM-shy





DETAL

110T TO




~---------------------------------------shy~ ------------------------------------~shy- ------------------------------- ------


_

u-middot

barcode 580840


AGENDA


SPRINGFIEW VERMONT

JULy 12 1990 738PM









APPDOIX B


MEETING SUMMARY


JULY 1990































Site History




lt=--- to Dote




rlti~=t (bull I






_ - --pdoo




~


I II








~olSiteiUib











~middotmiddot- shy













~








0 ~

lGM0 (IgtM

i~ -ltM Mltr o illr

SM

r r


I ~ I











~













--fordalplllld lywr










































I I

~ I









For Moq Inlonnatlon

~

middot

A cap is uaually

LIUWI)o Ad


Prcpooed Plan 17



oc













-~












-~--Ad(8CIIA)









WEATHERSFELD

CAVNDISH


GRAFTON


t N

I



---

---- arm

--WASTE AREA 1y-ARY

I

bull-

_ --IITATD

I

WASTE AREA

middot--4middot I

J

middott N

I


FIGURE 2 SITE MAP

---- P8ICM-shy





DETAL

110T TO




~---------------------------------------shy~ ------------------------------------~shy- ------------------------------- ------


_

u-middot

barcode 580840


APPDOIX B


MEETING SUMMARY


JULY 1990































Site History




lt=--- to Dote




rlti~=t (bull I






_ - --pdoo




~


I II








~olSiteiUib











~middotmiddot- shy













~








0 ~

lGM0 (IgtM

i~ -ltM Mltr o illr

SM

r r


I ~ I











~













--fordalplllld lywr










































I I

~ I









For Moq Inlonnatlon

~

middot

A cap is uaually

LIUWI)o Ad


Prcpooed Plan 17



oc













-~












-~--Ad(8CIIA)









WEATHERSFELD

CAVNDISH


GRAFTON


t N

I



---

---- arm

--WASTE AREA 1y-ARY

I

bull-

_ --IITATD

I

WASTE AREA

middot--4middot I

J

middott N

I


FIGURE 2 SITE MAP

---- P8ICM-shy





DETAL

110T TO




~---------------------------------------shy~ ------------------------------------~shy- ------------------------------- ------


_

u-middot

barcode 580840



JULY 1990































Site History




lt=--- to Dote




rlti~=t (bull I






_ - --pdoo




~


I II








~olSiteiUib











~middotmiddot- shy













~








0 ~

lGM0 (IgtM

i~ -ltM Mltr o illr

SM

r r


I ~ I











~













--fordalplllld lywr










































I I

~ I









For Moq Inlonnatlon

~

middot

A cap is uaually

LIUWI)o Ad


Prcpooed Plan 17



oc













-~












-~--Ad(8CIIA)









WEATHERSFELD

CAVNDISH


GRAFTON


t N

I



---

---- arm

--WASTE AREA 1y-ARY

I

bull-

_ --IITATD

I

WASTE AREA

middot--4middot I

J

middott N

I


FIGURE 2 SITE MAP

---- P8ICM-shy





DETAL

110T TO




~---------------------------------------shy~ ------------------------------------~shy- ------------------------------- ------


_

u-middot

barcode 580840
























Site History




lt=--- to Dote




rlti~=t (bull I






_ - --pdoo




~


I II








~olSiteiUib











~middotmiddot- shy













~








0 ~

lGM0 (IgtM

i~ -ltM Mltr o illr

SM

r r


I ~ I











~













--fordalplllld lywr










































I I

~ I









For Moq Inlonnatlon

~

middot

A cap is uaually

LIUWI)o Ad


Prcpooed Plan 17



oc













-~












-~--Ad(8CIIA)









WEATHERSFELD

CAVNDISH


GRAFTON


t N

I



---

---- arm

--WASTE AREA 1y-ARY

I

bull-

_ --IITATD

I

WASTE AREA

middot--4middot I

J

middott N

I


FIGURE 2 SITE MAP

---- P8ICM-shy





DETAL

110T TO




~---------------------------------------shy~ ------------------------------------~shy- ------------------------------- ------


_

u-middot

barcode 580840







_ - --pdoo




~


I II








~olSiteiUib











~middotmiddot- shy













~








0 ~

lGM0 (IgtM

i~ -ltM Mltr o illr

SM

r r


I ~ I











~













--fordalplllld lywr










































I I

~ I









For Moq Inlonnatlon

~

middot

A cap is uaually

LIUWI)o Ad


Prcpooed Plan 17



oc













-~












-~--Ad(8CIIA)









WEATHERSFELD

CAVNDISH


GRAFTON


t N

I



---

---- arm

--WASTE AREA 1y-ARY

I

bull-

_ --IITATD

I

WASTE AREA

middot--4middot I

J

middott N

I


FIGURE 2 SITE MAP

---- P8ICM-shy





DETAL

110T TO




~---------------------------------------shy~ ------------------------------------~shy- ------------------------------- ------


_

u-middot

barcode 580840









~olSiteiUib











~middotmiddot- shy













~








0 ~

lGM0 (IgtM

i~ -ltM Mltr o illr

SM

r r


I ~ I











~













--fordalplllld lywr










































I I

~ I









For Moq Inlonnatlon

~

middot

A cap is uaually

LIUWI)o Ad


Prcpooed Plan 17



oc













-~












-~--Ad(8CIIA)









WEATHERSFELD

CAVNDISH


GRAFTON


t N

I



---

---- arm

--WASTE AREA 1y-ARY

I

bull-

_ --IITATD

I

WASTE AREA

middot--4middot I

J

middott N

I


FIGURE 2 SITE MAP

---- P8ICM-shy





DETAL

110T TO




~---------------------------------------shy~ ------------------------------------~shy- ------------------------------- ------


_

u-middot

barcode 580840









~middotmiddot- shy













~








0 ~

lGM0 (IgtM

i~ -ltM Mltr o illr

SM

r r


I ~ I











~













--fordalplllld lywr










































I I

~ I









For Moq Inlonnatlon

~

middot

A cap is uaually

LIUWI)o Ad


Prcpooed Plan 17



oc













-~












-~--Ad(8CIIA)









WEATHERSFELD

CAVNDISH


GRAFTON


t N

I



---

---- arm

--WASTE AREA 1y-ARY

I

bull-

_ --IITATD

I

WASTE AREA

middot--4middot I

J

middott N

I


FIGURE 2 SITE MAP

---- P8ICM-shy





DETAL

110T TO




~---------------------------------------shy~ ------------------------------------~shy- ------------------------------- ------


_

u-middot

barcode 580840












~








0 ~

lGM0 (IgtM

i~ -ltM Mltr o illr

SM

r r


I ~ I











~













--fordalplllld lywr










































I I

~ I









For Moq Inlonnatlon

~

middot

A cap is uaually

LIUWI)o Ad


Prcpooed Plan 17



oc













-~












-~--Ad(8CIIA)









WEATHERSFELD

CAVNDISH


GRAFTON


t N

I



---

---- arm

--WASTE AREA 1y-ARY

I

bull-

_ --IITATD

I

WASTE AREA

middot--4middot I

J

middott N

I


FIGURE 2 SITE MAP

---- P8ICM-shy





DETAL

110T TO




~---------------------------------------shy~ ------------------------------------~shy- ------------------------------- ------


_

u-middot

barcode 580840


I ~ I











~













--fordalplllld lywr










































I I

~ I









For Moq Inlonnatlon

~

middot

A cap is uaually

LIUWI)o Ad


Prcpooed Plan 17



oc













-~












-~--Ad(8CIIA)









WEATHERSFELD

CAVNDISH


GRAFTON


t N

I



---

---- arm

--WASTE AREA 1y-ARY

I

bull-

_ --IITATD

I

WASTE AREA

middot--4middot I

J

middott N

I


FIGURE 2 SITE MAP

---- P8ICM-shy





DETAL

110T TO




~---------------------------------------shy~ ------------------------------------~shy- ------------------------------- ------


_

u-middot

barcode 580840


~













--fordalplllld lywr










































I I

~ I









For Moq Inlonnatlon

~

middot

A cap is uaually

LIUWI)o Ad


Prcpooed Plan 17



oc













-~












-~--Ad(8CIIA)









WEATHERSFELD

CAVNDISH


GRAFTON


t N

I



---

---- arm

--WASTE AREA 1y-ARY

I

bull-

_ --IITATD

I

WASTE AREA

middot--4middot I

J

middott N

I


FIGURE 2 SITE MAP

---- P8ICM-shy





DETAL

110T TO




~---------------------------------------shy~ ------------------------------------~shy- ------------------------------- ------


_

u-middot

barcode 580840



--fordalplllld lywr










































I I

~ I









For Moq Inlonnatlon

~

middot

A cap is uaually

LIUWI)o Ad


Prcpooed Plan 17



oc













-~












-~--Ad(8CIIA)









WEATHERSFELD

CAVNDISH


GRAFTON


t N

I



---

---- arm

--WASTE AREA 1y-ARY

I

bull-

_ --IITATD

I

WASTE AREA

middot--4middot I

J

middott N

I


FIGURE 2 SITE MAP

---- P8ICM-shy





DETAL

110T TO




~---------------------------------------shy~ ------------------------------------~shy- ------------------------------- ------


_

u-middot

barcode 580840
































I I

~ I









For Moq Inlonnatlon

~

middot

A cap is uaually

LIUWI)o Ad


Prcpooed Plan 17



oc













-~












-~--Ad(8CIIA)









WEATHERSFELD

CAVNDISH


GRAFTON


t N

I



---

---- arm

--WASTE AREA 1y-ARY

I

bull-

_ --IITATD

I

WASTE AREA

middot--4middot I

J

middott N

I


FIGURE 2 SITE MAP

---- P8ICM-shy





DETAL

110T TO




~---------------------------------------shy~ ------------------------------------~shy- ------------------------------- ------


_

u-middot

barcode 580840










For Moq Inlonnatlon

~

middot

A cap is uaually

LIUWI)o Ad


Prcpooed Plan 17



oc













-~












-~--Ad(8CIIA)









WEATHERSFELD

CAVNDISH


GRAFTON


t N

I



---

---- arm

--WASTE AREA 1y-ARY

I

bull-

_ --IITATD

I

WASTE AREA

middot--4middot I

J

middott N

I


FIGURE 2 SITE MAP

---- P8ICM-shy





DETAL

110T TO




~---------------------------------------shy~ ------------------------------------~shy- ------------------------------- ------


_

u-middot

barcode 580840








-~












-~--Ad(8CIIA)









WEATHERSFELD

CAVNDISH


GRAFTON


t N

I



---

---- arm

--WASTE AREA 1y-ARY

I

bull-

_ --IITATD

I

WASTE AREA

middot--4middot I

J

middott N

I


FIGURE 2 SITE MAP

---- P8ICM-shy





DETAL

110T TO




~---------------------------------------shy~ ------------------------------------~shy- ------------------------------- ------


_

u-middot

barcode 580840






-~--Ad(8CIIA)









WEATHERSFELD

CAVNDISH


GRAFTON


t N

I



---

---- arm

--WASTE AREA 1y-ARY

I

bull-

_ --IITATD

I

WASTE AREA

middot--4middot I

J

middott N

I


FIGURE 2 SITE MAP

---- P8ICM-shy





DETAL

110T TO




~---------------------------------------shy~ ------------------------------------~shy- ------------------------------- ------


_

u-middot

barcode 580840




WEATHERSFELD

CAVNDISH


GRAFTON


t N

I



---

---- arm

--WASTE AREA 1y-ARY

I

bull-

_ --IITATD

I

WASTE AREA

middot--4middot I

J

middott N

I


FIGURE 2 SITE MAP

---- P8ICM-shy





DETAL

110T TO




~---------------------------------------shy~ ------------------------------------~shy- ------------------------------- ------


_

u-middot

barcode 580840


---

---- arm

--WASTE AREA 1y-ARY

I

bull-

_ --IITATD

I

WASTE AREA

middot--4middot I

J

middott N

I


FIGURE 2 SITE MAP

---- P8ICM-shy





DETAL

110T TO




~---------------------------------------shy~ ------------------------------------~shy- ------------------------------- ------


_

u-middot

barcode 580840





DETAL

110T TO




~---------------------------------------shy~ ------------------------------------~shy- ------------------------------- ------


_

u-middot

barcode 580840





~---------------------------------------shy~ ------------------------------------~shy- ------------------------------- ------


_

u-middot

barcode 580840


FINAL PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY CONCERNING · PDF filepreferred reaeclial altarnativer...

Documents

Transcript of FINAL PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY CONCERNING · PDF filepreferred reaeclial altarnativer...