Final Ppt Peripheral Cues
-
Upload
bhavik-parmar -
Category
Documents
-
view
25 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Final Ppt Peripheral Cues
![Page 1: Final Ppt Peripheral Cues](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051515/552c2f0f4a7959230c8b46b8/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
A Presentation on “Impact of peripheral cues on
rural consumer buying decision for FMCG products with special
reference to Bhavnagar district ”
![Page 2: Final Ppt Peripheral Cues](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051515/552c2f0f4a7959230c8b46b8/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
IntroductionPeripheral cues can be defined as an object
which drives attention of consumers towards particular tangible things which affect consumers to make buying decisions
Scope of the study is limited to three villages of Bhavnagar district namely Fariyadka, Kamlej & Sidsar
Rationale for considering FMCG product is that such product are identified with large no of peripheral cues.
![Page 3: Final Ppt Peripheral Cues](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051515/552c2f0f4a7959230c8b46b8/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Variables considered (peripheral cues)
Packaging colorLabelingPosterStore outlookTelevision advertisementsShape of the productSize of the product
![Page 4: Final Ppt Peripheral Cues](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051515/552c2f0f4a7959230c8b46b8/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Research ObjectiveTo find out impact of peripheral cues on
rural customer buying decision process for Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG)
To identify different peripheral cues affecting rural consumer buying decision
To compare and contrast opinion given by respondent from three villages
![Page 5: Final Ppt Peripheral Cues](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051515/552c2f0f4a7959230c8b46b8/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Hypothesis of the study(1)H0: There is No association between
peripheral cues and Rural customer buying decision
H1: There is association between peripheral cues and Rural customer buying decision
(2)H0: There is a significant difference among the opinion given by respondent among three different villages regarding peripheral cues
H1: There is No significant difference among the opinion given by respondent among three different villages regarding peripheral cues
![Page 6: Final Ppt Peripheral Cues](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051515/552c2f0f4a7959230c8b46b8/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Research MethodologyType of research design: Exploratory
researchData collection instrument : Questionnaire Scaling technique : Likert 5-point scaleData analysis technique: chi-square test
and F-testPopulation: consumers from Fariyadka,
Kamlej and SidsarSample size: 75 (25 from each villages )Sampling technique: Quota Sampling
![Page 7: Final Ppt Peripheral Cues](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051515/552c2f0f4a7959230c8b46b8/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Data collectionPackaging color
Peripheral cues
Strongly Agree
Agree Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree Strongly disagree
Total
Fariyadka 25 0 0 0 0 25
Sidsar 20 1 2 1 1 25
Kamlej 17 4 0 4 0 25
Total 62 5 2 5 1 75
Interpretations: 82% of the respondent strongly agrees to consider packaging colors peripheral cues
![Page 8: Final Ppt Peripheral Cues](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051515/552c2f0f4a7959230c8b46b8/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Labeling Peripheral cues
Strongly Agree
Agree Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree Strongly disagree
Total
Fariyadka 3 7 5 4 6 25
Sidsar 7 8 5 2 3 25
Kamlej 4 10 3 3 5 25
Total 14 25 13 9 14 75
Interpretation: There is a mix opinion for labeling as peripheral cues consider for buying decision, due to low literacy level compared to urban area
![Page 9: Final Ppt Peripheral Cues](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051515/552c2f0f4a7959230c8b46b8/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
PosterPeripheral cues
Strongly Agree
Agree Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree Strongly disagree
Total
Fariyadka 2 12 3 3 5 25
Sidsar 4 10 4 4 3 25
Kamlej 5 8 4 4 4 25
Total 11 30 11 11 12 75
Interpretation: 40% percent of the respondent are agreed about the poster to be considered as peripheral cues
![Page 10: Final Ppt Peripheral Cues](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051515/552c2f0f4a7959230c8b46b8/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Retail store outlookPeripheral cues
Strongly Agree
Agree Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree Strongly disagree
Total
Fariyadka 2 12 4 5 2 25
Sidsar 5 11 4 4 1 25
Kamlej 4 15 1 2 3 25
Total 11 38 9 11 6 75
Interpretation: 50 % of the respondent are agreed about retail store outlook as peripheral cues
![Page 11: Final Ppt Peripheral Cues](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051515/552c2f0f4a7959230c8b46b8/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Television AdvertisementPeripheral cues
Strongly Agree
Agree Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree Strongly disagree
Total
Fariyadka 2 12 4 5 2 25
Sidsar 5 8 5 6 1 25
Kamlej 3 9 6 3 4 25
Total 10 29 15 14 7 75
Interpretation: There is a mix response about T.V ads
![Page 12: Final Ppt Peripheral Cues](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051515/552c2f0f4a7959230c8b46b8/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Shape of the productPeripheral cues
Strongly Agree
Agree Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree Strongly disagree
Total
Fariyadka 6 8 5 4 2 25
Sidsar 4 11 4 5 1 25
Kamlej 2 14 4 3 2 25
Total 12 33 13 12 5 75
Interpretation: 44% of the respondent are agreed about shape of the product to be considered as peripheral cues
![Page 13: Final Ppt Peripheral Cues](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051515/552c2f0f4a7959230c8b46b8/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Size of the product
Peripheral cues
Strongly Agree
Agree Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree Strongly disagree
Total
Fariyadka 6 8 4 3 4 25
Sidsar 4 9 5 5 2 25
Kamlej 5 12 2 3 3 25
Total 15 29 11 11 9 75
Interpretation: 39% of the respondents are agreed for size of the product to be considered as peripheral cues
![Page 14: Final Ppt Peripheral Cues](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051515/552c2f0f4a7959230c8b46b8/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Data AnalysisChi-square test resultCritical Value-18.54934779Chi-Square Test Statistic-124.5233901Interpretations: As the calculated value
(124.52) is higher than critical value (18.55), Null hypothesis was rejected. Hence Peripheral cues affect rural customer buying decision significantly.
![Page 15: Final Ppt Peripheral Cues](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051515/552c2f0f4a7959230c8b46b8/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
F-TESTPeripheral cues
Between Fariyadka & Sidsar
Between Sidsar & Kamlej
Between Fariyadka & Kamlej
F-Test Result
Packaging Colors
0.592674 0.733037 0.386492 Reject H0
Labeling 0.377229 0.801185 0.26296 Reject H0
Posters 0.500472 0.365139 0.127447 Reject H0
Store Outlook 0.828624 0.415668 0.545654 Reject H0
Tv Ads 0.374387 1 0.374387 Reject H0
Shape of the product
0.359307 0.541162 0.139304 Reject H0
Size of the Product
0.649606 0.388921 0.19872 Reject H0
![Page 16: Final Ppt Peripheral Cues](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051515/552c2f0f4a7959230c8b46b8/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Cont…Interpretations: Opinions of the rural
customer among three villages are not significantly different as H0 was rejected for all peripheral cues.
![Page 17: Final Ppt Peripheral Cues](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051515/552c2f0f4a7959230c8b46b8/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Main Findings82.67% Rural consumers take buying decision on
the basis of peripheral cues like colors of packaging
100% of the respondents from Fariyadka are strongly agreed about packaging color as one of the most influencing peripheral cues
strong similarity in opinion can be seen between Opinion given by Fariyadka & Kamlej Respondets (F-Test:0.12) in case of Poster as peripheral cues.
While opinion of Sidsar & Kamlej Respondent are significantly different (F-test:1) in case of TV Ads.
![Page 18: Final Ppt Peripheral Cues](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051515/552c2f0f4a7959230c8b46b8/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Cont…There is a mix response regarding
labeling but still 33.33% respondents agree with labeling as peripheral cues affecting their buying decision
Size of the product, Retail store outlook and poster at retailer’s store are explored during the study as significant peripheral cues considered by rural customer.
![Page 19: Final Ppt Peripheral Cues](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051515/552c2f0f4a7959230c8b46b8/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
conclusion As a researcher, I would like to conclude that
there is a strong impact of peripheral cues on rural customer buying decision (Chi-square-124.52>18.54). Opinion of the respondents are similar in nature regarding impact of peripheral cues among three villages. Packaging color found to be most important peripheral cues affecting as 82.67% respondents are strongly agree. However strong similarity in opinion can be seen between Opinion given by Fariyadka & Kamlej Respondets (F-Test:0.12) While opinion of Sidsar & Kamlej Respondent are different (F-test:1) but not significantly in case of TV Ads
![Page 20: Final Ppt Peripheral Cues](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051515/552c2f0f4a7959230c8b46b8/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
ReferencesC.R.Kothari, “Research methodology-Methods
& Technique”,2nd revised edition, New Age international Publishers
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elaboration_likelihood_model
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/perpheral_cues http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2488919http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/psp/46/1/69Primary data collected through questionnaire
from Respondent of three different villages.
![Page 21: Final Ppt Peripheral Cues](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051515/552c2f0f4a7959230c8b46b8/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
THANK YOU