Final minutes of 226 SEAC Meeting Dated 10-07-2015 › Uploads › MeetingMinutePdfs › ... · The...

of 44

Minutes of 226th

SEAC Meeting Date 10/07/2015

The 226th

meeting of SEAC was held in Directorate of Environment, U.P. on

10/07/2015. Following members were present in the meeting along with Secretary,

SEAC:

1. Dr. M. S. Khan Chairman

2. Dr. S.N. Singh Member

3. Shri S.C. Bramhchari Member

4. Dr. D. C. Gupta, Member

5. Shri Lalji Rai Secretary

The Chairman welcomed the members to the 226th

SEAC meeting.

The minutes of 225th SEAC meeting dated 04/07/2015 were confirmed.

The Members of SEAC unanimously taken following decisions on the agenda

points discussed:

1. Group Housing Project at Khasra No-1109, 1110, Vill-Morta, Ghaziabad. Sri

Vijyant Jain, Director, C-10, Ramprastha, Ghaziabad. File No. 2492/SPO-V

The committee noted that consultant to the project could not present their

accreditation/credentials related to QCI/NABET. The proponent was also not ready with their

presentation. The committee directed to appear with complete documents and accreditations.

The committee also directed to submit all approved plans and the matter shall be deferred till

request from the project proponent in this regard.

2. Group Housing “Akansha Basera” No-5, Sector-K, Sushant Golf City, Hi Tech

Township Extension Area, Lucknow. Sri Vinod Tikku. File No. 2531/AD-Sub

The project proponent did not appear. The committee discussed and deliberated that

project fie should be closed and should be opened only after request from the project

proponent. The file shall not be treated as pending at SEIAA/SEAC.

3. Group Housing “Hamony Enclave” No-4, Sector-K, Sushant Golf City, Hi Tech

Township Extension Area, Lucknow. Sri Vinod Tikku, Ex. Director (Project) , File

No. 2532/SPO-V




4. Residential Project “Nikhil Park Royal” at Khasra No-210, Mauza Chamraui, Taj

Ganj Ward, Agra. Sri Shailendra Agrawal. File No. 2533/OSD-T




Minutes of 226th

SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015

of 44

5. Group Housing Project “Aunipark” at Plot No-INS-02, CHI-V, Yamuna

Expressway, Greater Noida. Dri Dinesh Kumar, GM. File No. 2546/AD-Sub

The committee noted that an application dated 26/08/2014 was made by the project

proponent for environmental clearance of Group Housing Project “Aunipark” at Plot No-

INS-02, CHI-V, Yamuna Expressway, Greater Noida.

A presentation was made by Shri Mahendra Pandey as consultant and representative

of project proponent. Mr. Pandey informed the committee that the project proposal has been

revised and now the built up area as 1,58,088.596 sqm hence, the proposals are not covered

under category 8"b". The committee directed to submit complete revised proposals and to

defer the matter for next meeting for scoping. An affidavit shall also be submitted by the

proponent that no construction work has been yet started on the site.

6. 300 Beded combined hospital at Gata No.41/1,42 Tehsil-Sadar, District-Bareilly- File

No. 2564/DD-Y


proponent for environmental clearance of 300 Beded combined hospital at Gata No.41/1,42

Tehsil-Sadar, District-Bareilly.

A presentation was made by Dr. S.S. Sachan, Deputy CMO, Bareilly, project

proponent alongwith their consultant M/s Sawen Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd.

The project proponent informed that committee that 25% construction work has

already been undertaken. The committee discussed the matter and deliberated that Hon'ble

NGT in its order dated 07/07/2015 in the matter of S.P. Muthuraman V/s Union of India and

Ors. (Original Application No. 37 Of 2015 (M.A. No. 291, 293 & 294 Of 2015) and Original

Application No. 213 Of 2014 (Ma 755 Of 2014 & M.A. No. 177 Of 2015) has quashed the

MoEF OMs dated 12/12/2012 and 27/06/2013 related to provisions for dealing the violation

matters. In this situation the matter may be forwarded to SEIAA for taking necessary action

in view of Hon'ble NGT decision dated 07/07/2015.

7. Group Housing Project “Gangotri Enclave” at Plot No-8/GH-4, Sector-8, Avadh

Vihar Yojna (Sultanpur Road) Tehsil & Distt-Lucknow. Er. R B Yadav, Ex. Engg.,

CD-15, 2nd Floor, Sector-9, Vrindavan Yojna, Raebarelly Road, LKO. File No.

2731/DD-Y

The committee noted that the matter was earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated

01/06/2015 wherein the project proponent did not appear. The matter was again scheduled in

SEAC meeting dated 10/07/2015.

A presentation was made by Shri R.B. Yadav, Ex. Engineer, UP Awas Avam Vikas

Parishad alongwith their consultant M/s Sawen Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd. The

committee discussed the matter and directed the proponent to submit following information:

1. Area details showing proposed uses as residential, commercial, parks, parking, roads,

other services, facilities of the project also in percentage.

2. Maps/plans/services plans approved by Competent Authority.

3. Land allotment letter.

4. The structure design certificate by qualified structure engineer should be submitted.

The structural design certificate should preferably be vetted by IITs/CBRI. Provision

Minutes of 226th


of 44

of alarm system, to timely notify the employees/residents, in case of occurrence of

earthquake/other natural disasters/fire should be provided.

5. All internal roads should be 09 m wide. Plan for right of way and carriage way and

section of road should be submitted.

6. Break-up of open area and landscape plan should be submitted.

7. Solid waste management and disposal plan with identification of authorized agency. .

8. Plan for 03 m peripheral green shall be provided along the boundary of the project.

9. Plan for Rain water harvesting.

10. Plan for plantation of minimum 300 trees should be submitted.

11. Provision of 100% solar lighting along the road site, stair cases, common places.

12. NOC from Fire Department and Airport Authority of India.

The matter shall be discussed after submission of information as above.

8. Group Housing Project “Bhagirathi Enclave” at Plot No-GH-1, Sector-2B, Avadh

Vihar Yojna (Sultanpur Road) Tehsil & Distt-Lucknow. Er. R L Yadav, Ex. Engg.,

UPAVP, Office Complex, Boothnath Mandir Marg, Indira Nagar, LKO. File No.

2732/AD -H


proponent for environmental clearance of Group Housing Project “Bhagirathi Enclave” at

Plot No-GH-1, Sector-2B, Avadh Vihar Yojna (Sultanpur Road) Tehsil & Distt-Lucknow.

A presentation was made by Er. R.L. Yadav, UP Awas Avam Vikas Parishad

alongwith their consultant M/s E.C. Engineers, Jaipur. The committee discussed the matter

and directed the proponent to submit following information:


















The committee also observed that there were several calculation mistakes in the

presentations. The quality of presentations was very poor. The consultant may be directed to

submit the profile of the company along with details of the work experience in the field of the

construction projects and should also submit the names of the coordinator/field area experts

etc.


Minutes of 226th


of 44

9. Group Housing Project “Mandakini Enclave” at Khasra no. 183, 189, 190, 193, 184,

185, 186, 187, 188, 191, 192, 194, 195 & 196 Avadh Vihar Yojna (Sultanpur Road)

Lucknow. Er. Ramesh Mishra, Ex. Engg., Div-21, UPAVP, LKO. File No.

2733/SPO-V


proponent for environmental clearance of Group Housing Project “Mandakini Enclave” at

Khasra no. 183, 189, 190, 193, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 191, 192, 194, 195 & 196 Avadh

Vihar Yojna (Sultanpur Road) Lucknow.

A presentation was made by Shri Ramesh Mishra, Executive Engineer, UP Awas

Avam Vikas Parishad alongwith their consultant M/s E.C. Engineers, Jaipur. The committee

discussed the matter and directed the proponent to submit following information:






















etc.


10. Group Housing Project “Alaknanda Enclave” at Plot No-G-2 & G-3, Khasra No.

217, 228-233, 243-254, 256, 259-266, Avadh Vihar Yojna (Sultanpur Road) -

Lucknow. Er. Ramesh Mishra, Ex. Engg. File No. 2734/OSD-T


proponent for environmental clearance of Group Housing Project “Alaknanda Enclave” at

Plot No-G-2 & G-3, Khasra No. 217, 228-233, 243-254, 256, 259-266, Avadh Vihar Yojna

(Sultanpur Road) -Lucknow.

A presentation was made by Shri Anil Kumar Mishra, Executive Engineer, UP Awas

Avam Vikas Parishad alongwith their consultant M/s E.C. Engineers, Jaipur. The committee

discussed the matter and directed the proponent to submit following information:

Minutes of 226th


of 44






















etc.


11. Bhaunrat Dam Irrigation Project having CCA 9850 Ha in Mahrouni, Lalitpur. Sri

K.K. Agrawal, Ex.Engg, Irrigation Construction Div-II, Lalitpur. File No.

2641/OSD-T


proponent for environmental clearance of Bhaunrat Dam project, Tehsil-Mehrouni, District-

Lalitpur. Gross Command area for irrigation is 13450 ha & culturable command area is 9850

ha (Existing command 7995 ha and new command 1855 ha). Terms of reference were issued

through letter dated 02/12/2014. Public hearing was undertaken on 25/04/2015 in village-

Bhaunrat, Tehsil-Mehrauni, District-Lalitpur, U.P. under Chairmanship of Shri ADM,

Lalitpur. Final EIA was submitted through letter dated 21/05/2015.

A presentation was made by the project proponent and along with their consultant M/s

CEMC Pvt. Ltd. The proponent, through the documents submitted and the presentation made,

informed the committee that:-

1. The environmental clearance is sought for Bhaunrat Dam project, Tehsil-Mehrouni,

District-Lalitpur. Gross Command area for irrigation is 13450 ha & culturable

command area is 9850 ha (Existing command 7995 ha and new command 1855 ha).

2. Project details of the project is as follows:

Project name Bhaunrat Dam Project, Tehsil Mehrouni,

District Lalitpur, Uttar Pradesh

Location of Dam Village- Bhaira, Tehsil- Mehrauni, Dist-

Lalitpur, Uttar Pradesh

Latitude 24

0

35’10” N

Minutes of 226th


of 44

Longitude 78

0

40’00” E

Source Supply Jamni River (Betwa Basin)

Net Catchment Area (U.P.) for Bhaunrat Dam 335.40 Sq. Km

Irrigation- Gross Command Area (Ha.)- 13450 Ha

Culturable Command Area (Ha)-

Water Required for Drinking

Water Required for Irrigation

9850 Ha (Existing 7955 Ha & new 1855 Ha.)

1.00 M.C.M.

34.90 M.C.M.

(24.10 M.C.M. in Rabi & 10.80 M.C.M. In

Kharif)

Type of Dam

Ht. of Dam – Above River Bed (Max.)

Gross Storage

Live storage

Dead Storage Length of Dam

Evaporation/Absorption Losses

Useful Storage

Levels Elevations –

River Bed Level (Average)

Dead Storage Level

FRL/FSL

Highest Flood Level

Top Level of Dam

Earthen Dam

19.93 m

45.08 M.C.M.

40.55 M.C.M.

4.53 M.C.M. 4.20 K.m.

4.65 M.C.M.

35.90 M.C.M.

344.00 M.

354.55 M.

360.90 M.

361.40 M.

363.10 M.

Spillway – Type

Clear water way/Length

No./Type/Size of Gate

Energy Dissipation Device Type

Ogee Shaped

130m/157m

13 No. vertical lift gate (10mx6.5m)

Stilling Basin with chute blocks

Abadi Submerged – No. of Village

No. of Building

No. of Families Affected

06 (Satlinga, Bhaunrat, Chhaprat, Kisarda,

Mudia and Vedpur)

78 Pucca/347 Kachcha

311

Submerged Area at Full Reservoir Level 1260 Ha.

Land to Be acquired –

Submergence

Head works

Canal

Total -

1094.00 Ha.

55.48 Ha.

117.30 Ha.

1266.78 Ha. Out of which 201 Ha forest land

Total Cost of Project 44003.77 Lac

Benefits – Additional yield 344100 Qtl. (Food-Grain)

Benefit – Cost Ratio 1.61

Cost of Irrigation/Ha. 2.44 Lac/Ha.

Topo sheet number 54L/15

Man power 200

Nearest railway station Lalitpur Railway Station, 40.00 km

Nearest Road/national highway Mahrauni

Nearest air port Gwalior Airport, approx. 240 km.

Seismic zone Zone-V (As per 1893:2002)

3. Bhaunrat Dam Project is proposed for providing irrigation facility for an area of 9850

Ha.

4. The TOR was approved on 15-11-2014 vide letter no. Parya/SEAC/2641/2014

/OSD(T).

5. The baseline environmental studies have been conducted during November 2014 to

February 2015 as per the approved TOR and Draft EIA was submitted to U.P.

Pollution Control Board for conducting Public Hearing.

6. The Public Hearing was conducted on 25-04-2015 in village-Bhaunrat, Tehsil-

Mehrauni, District-Lalitpur, U.P.

Minutes of 226th


of 44

7. The Final EIA after incorporating public hearing minutes and action plan has been

submitted for environmental clearance to SEIAA.

8. Jamni Dam Irrigation project already exists on Jamni River which is approximately 20

km upstream of the proposed dam. However, the catchment area of 335 Sq. Km is

untapped which will act as catchment by the proposed project.

9. The District Agriculture Officer has assessed that the project on completion will cater

to an area of 9000 ha during Khariff and 7700 ha in Rabi.

10. Land requirements for the project are 1266.78 out of which 201 Ha is forest land. The

villages Satlinga, Bhaunarat, chaprat, Kisarda, Mudia, Vedpur are impacted due to

submergence.

11. 311 families, 78 Pucca and 347 Kachcha houses will be affected and to be

rehabilitated. Appropriate compensation packages according to the R & R policy,

2007 will be provided to those families who are identified by the committee formed

by govt. for R & R work of this project.

12. The total project cost is Rs. 44003.77 Lakh & a total budget of Rs. 1565.37 Lacs +

6.03 ha land for resettlement purposes would be required for the Resettlement and

Rehabilitation Plan.

13. Total project cost is Rs. 440.Crores and CSR expenditure will be in the form of

providing employment for 100 persons. The drinking water and health Check-up to be

provided. CSR will be 3.557% for social benefits and other services.

14. Forest land is in the active stage of acquisition. The report for this has been prepared

and being investigated by the Forest Department.

15. The project proposals are covered under category 1"c" of EIA notification, 2006, as

amended.

The committee discussed the matter and observed that following provisions have been

prescribed in OM No. J-11013/41/2006-IA.II(I) dated 09/09/2011 of MoEF, Govt. of India

regarding "Consideration of projects for grant of environment clearance under EIA

Notification, 2006, which involve forestland - Procedure to be followed-further

clarifications":

"At the stage of consideration of proposals for EC in respect of projects involving

forestland, the project proponent would inform the respective EACs about the status of

their application for forestry clearance along with necessary supporting documents from the

concerned Forest Authorities. It will clearly be informed to the EAC whether the application

is at the State level or at the Central level. The EAC will take cognizance of the involvement

of forestland and its status in terms of forestry clearance and make their recommendations

on the project on its merits. After the EAC has recommended the project for environmental

clearance, it would be processed on file for obtaining decision of the Competent Authority

for grant of environmental clearance. In the cases where the Competent Authority has

approved the grant of environmental clearance, the proponent will be informed of the same

and a time limit of 12 months, which may be extended in exceptional circumstances to 18

months, a decision on which will be taken by the Competent Authority, will be given to the

proponent to submit the requisite stage-I forestry clearance. The formal environmental

clearance will be issued only after the stage-I forestry clearance has been submitted by the

proponent.

Minutes of 226th


of 44

In the eventuality that the stage-I forestry clearance is not submitted by the

proponent within the prescribed time limit mentioned at para (ii) above, the proposal for

environmental clearance will stand rejected and the entire process of obtaining

environmental clearance will have to be initiated de-novo as per the procedure prescribed

under EIA Notification, 2006."

In view of above, the committee directed that compliance to above provisions of OM

dated 09/09/2011 should be submitted in terms of status of their application for forestry

clearance along with necessary supporting documents from the concerned Forest Authorities

prior to further consideration of project. The committee also directed to submit 24 year

records of flood data of the River and excavated Soil management and uses.

The matter may be scheduled immediately after submission of information/documents

as above.

12. Trade Facilitation Centre & Crafts Museum at Bada Lalpur, Varanasi, U.P. Si

Manoj Jain, Director, Office of Development Commission (Handloom) File No.

3190/AD-Sub The committee noted that an application dated 16/06/2015was made by the project

proponent for environmental clearance of Trade Facilitation Centre & Crafts Museum at

Bada Lalpur, Varanasi, U.P.

A presentation was made by Shri S.Srinivas, NHDC Ltd., project proponent

alongwith their consultant M/s Grass Roots Research & Creation India (P) Ltd. The

committee discussed the matter and directed the project proponent to submit following

information:

1. Physical features within 30 m of the project site with their ownership. 2. Copy of layout plan/maps/services plans as approved by Development Authority.

3. List of proposed activities area wise. 4. Proposed fixed and floating population of the project.

5. Proposal regarding source of water for meeting the water requirement of the project. If ground water is proposed to be used, permission from ground water department should

be taken. Underground water tank for storage of storm water may be provided.

6. Dimensions of ramps and passages proposed for the project.

7. Pathways to connect the building should be explicitly shown on layout.

8. Proposal for rain water harvesting only from the rooftop. Plan for water body with

Kachha base should be submitted for storm water utilization for water recharge.

9. The structure design certificate by qualified structure engineer should be submitted. The

structural design certificate should be vetted by IITs/CBRI. Provision of alarm system,

to timely notify the employees/residents/visitors in case of occurrence of


10. Fire NOC to be submitted.

11. 36 nos. of trees are proposed to be cut. Prior permission from Forest Department should be taken alongwith compensatory plantation.

12. Identify authorized agency for Municipal solid waste management and disposal as per law. Submit plan. Location of landfill site to be provided.

13. Plan for provision of 100% solar energy on roads/streets and common places should be submitted.

14. Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary provision amounting to 2% of project cost shall be prepared and approved by Board of Directors

of the company. A copy of resolution as above shall be submitted to the authority alongwith list of beneficiaries with their mobile nos./address.


Minutes of 226th


of 44

13. Commercial Project “Sparsh” at Plot No-GH-02D, Sector-12, Greater Noida, U.P.

Sri Mradul Srivastava, B-11, Sector-1, Noida, U.P. File No. 2341/AD-H


31/01/2015 and 21/02/2015 wherein the project proponent was directed to submit

information. The project proponent submitted information through undated letter received on

28/04/2015. However, Dr. D.C. Gupta, Member, SEAC informed that he has not received the

copies of replies yet. Therefore, the committee directed to defer the matter for next meeting and directed the project proponent to ensure delivery of replies.

14. Group Housing “Ashwaryam” at Sector-16C Noida Extension (Gaur City-2)U.P.

Sri R.K.Gupta, Director, Unit No-9, Krishna Apra Sapphire Plaza, Indirapuram,

Ghaziabad. File No. 2342/DD-D


17/03/2015 wherein the project proponent was directed to submit information. The project proponent submitted information through undated letter received on 28/04/2015. However,

Dr. D.C. Gupta, Member, SEAC informed that he has not received the copies of replies yet.

Therefore, the committee directed to defer the matter for next meeting and directed the

project proponent to ensure delivery of replies.

15. Group Housing Project “RG Luxury Homes” at Plot No-GH-07A, Sector-16B,

Greater Noida Sri B K Agrawal, Sr. VP (Operation) File No. 2540/AD-H

The committee noted that terms of reference in the matter were prescribed in SEAC

meting dated 22/03/2015 and EIA have been submitted through letter dated 15/06/2015. The

EIA report was also not submitted to all the members as informed during the meeting,

therefore the presentation could not be made. The committee discussed and directed to schedule the matter as per chronology of 8"b" Category projects.

16. Theme Park, Agra, U.P., Developed by UPSIDC. Sri M L Sonkar, Ex. Engg (HQ),

UPSIDC Ltd., A-1/4, Lakhanpur, Kanpur. File No. 2576/AD(Sub)


25/05/2015 wherein the project proponent was directed to submit following information:

1. NOC from Taj Trapezium Zone Authority regarding the project proposals. 2. NOC from Central and State Departments of Archaeology.

3. Height of the land from mean Sea level and from maximum flood level.

4. No objection from Irrigation Department.

5. Study should be conducted regarding maximum flood level of 100 years.

6. What are the permissible uses of the site as per Agra Master Plan.

7. Plan for use of Solar Energy. Maximum solar energy uses should be explored.



9. Phase wise project details and proposed activities.

10. What is the total cost of the project and its detail of different phases. Specially Ist

phase details of project to be implemented with cost and recovery system.

11. What will be the Socio Economic impact on Agra town.

12. What is the distance from Taj Mahal of the proposed site. Whether the view of Taj

will be affected. A complete report with necessary supporting documents should be submitted.

13. Permission to be obtained from Central Ground Water Board for drilling of tube well and for making of water works.

Minutes of 226th


of 44

14. Minimum 2% provision is to be made under CSR. The detail with of CSR to be

provided with total cost and scheme to be executed in various phases during the

implementation of project. The list of beneficiaries along with project photographs is

to be submitted.

The committee also observed that the project proponent/EIA Consultant has not fully

complied the TOR POINTS like approval of the lay-out plan, conversion of land use from

agricultural to non agricultural, approvals of entire built up areas, obtaining NOC from NRCD, Irrigation Deptt. central water commission, Archaeological Survey of India etc. The

proposed land area is also not fully transferred and some part of it is under Stay of Hon' High court, Allahabad. The proponent has also not provided the details of the proposed built up

area block wise or building wise. The project proponent has not submitted the DPR actually prepared by the project proponents. The EIA report is not well documents and lacks in the

following:

• The Impact Analysis on the River Yamuna, The study of highest flood level/point and

the calculation of the safity distances, Impact on the seasional floods of Yamuna,alternative sources of water like putting water works instead of ground water

utilisation, Thinking of conducting a bandha along the river.

• There are approx. 400 big trees, many old water wells and the hand pumps etc in the

proposed land but nothing has been discussed in this regard. The same should be

covered under EIA.

• Disposal of domestic waste, domestic solid wastes are tentatively discussed and their

final disposal is also not environmentally safe. A comprehensive plan in this regard

should be prepared and submitted.

The project proponent submitted their replies through letter dated 29/06/2015. A

presentation was made by Shri Ashok Kumar Verma, representative of project proponent alongwith their consultant M/s Perfact Enviro Solutions Pvt. Ltd. The committee discussed

the matter and directed the project proponent to submit following information: 1. Regarding replies submitted against query no. 1, the committee noted that minutes of

meeting dated 07/01/2015 of TTZ Authority as submitted by project proponent states that the matter shall be discussed in next meeting of TTZ Authority after obtaining

EIA report. Since, EIA report in the matter has been prepared by the project

proponent, the same should be submitted to TTZ Authority for

consideration/clearance. Clearance from TTZ Authority should be submitted as also

pointed out by Archaeological Survey of India.

2. Regarding replies submitted against query no. 2, the committee noted that the project

proponent has submitted letter dated 13/01/2015 from Archaeological Survey of India

that proposed theme park is outside of the regulated area of central protected

monument of Archaeological Survey of India. But, since this project falls under TTZ

area, clearance from TTZ Authority is necessary. The SEAC observed that since the

clearance from TTZ Authority is very basic prerequisite of siting of this project,

which is also clear from letter dated 13/01/2015 of Archaeological Survey of India,

the project proponent should submit EIA report to Authority for

consideration/clearance from TTZ Authority. 3. Regarding replies submitted against query no. 4, the project proponent has submitted

copy of letter dated 03/01/2015 of Executive Engineer, Irrigation Khand, Hathras, wherein conditional NOC has been provided. However, it is also mentioned in the

letter dared 03/01/2015 that NOC from Lower Khand, Agra Canal, Agra and Irrigation Nirman Khand, Mathura shall also be obtained by the project proponent.

The committee directed that NOCs from all required agencies as mentioned in letter

Minutes of 226th


of 44

dated 03/01/2015 of Executive Engineer, Irrigation Khand, Hathras should also be

submitted for consideration.

4. Regarding replies submitted against query no. 5, the project proponent submitted

abstract of annual flood report from Irrigation Department with submission that

maximum flood level of Yamuna River in past 100 year was found to be 154.760 in

1987. The committee observed that document dated 20/08/2014 which provides

"nSfud unh ty Lrj ,oa ck<+ dh lwpuk ¼lwpuk dk lzksr&dsUnzh; ty vk;ksx] y[kuÅ½" however, in this documents it is not mentioned that it relates to information for last

100 years. Also, in Colum no. 5 of this information dated 20/08/2014 highest flood

level of Agra is 154.760 m for year 1978 however, the project proponent in his

presentation has mentioned it as year 1987. This mismatch should be clarified

alongwith documents which mentions that the submitted data relates to highest flood

levels for last 100 years. The committee also directed to submit horizontal expansion of flood within last 100 years. The proponent also informed that embankment shall be

constructed along the project boundary towards River Yamuna. The committee directed to submit NOC from related Department. The committee also directed to

submit study regarding the impact of construction of embankment on the other side of River Yamuna. A study of 100 years Flood level in future to be submitted to protect

and plan accordingly. 5. Regarding replies submitted against query no.6, the project proponent submitted that

as per Agra Master Plan, 2021 the land use for the land in question is "Agriculture". Part of the land was acquired by Agra Development Authority for "Planned

Development for 100 M Wide Road from NH-2 to NH-3 and land parcel" and the

balance was acquired by UPSIDC for "Development of Theme Park". The proponent

also informed that Agra Development Authority has informed through letter dated

03/06/2015 that Theme Park/Amusement Park is permitted to be established in the

land in question pursuant to G.O. No. 3150/41-2013-37YO/2012, dated 06/11/2013.

The SEAC noted that letter dated 03/06/2015 of Secretary, ADA states that proposal

for amendment in zoning regulation for establishment of Theme Park/Amusement

park in "Agriculture Land use" of Master Plan has been sent by authority to Govt. The

SEAC directed to submit Zoning regulation/Master Plan as approved by State Govt.

in continuation to letter dated 03/06/2015 of Secretary, ADA. Copy of Govt. Order

regarding 25% use of land for other activities is to be submitted. 6. Regarding replies submitted against query no.8, Activity wise land uses have been

submitted. The committee directed to submit approved plan/layout of the project by competent authority. The project proponent informed that the ADA has no jurisdiction

over the proposed site for approval. The committee directed to submit communication between project proponent and ADA where it has been communicated that ADA has

no jurisdiction over the proposed site for approval. Also, approved activity wise land uses from UPSIDC should be submitted as project proponent submitted that the

project is under jurisdiction of UPSIDC. 7. Regarding replies submitted against query no.9, the project proponent submitted that

first phase is to be completed in first four years from the date of commencements the

committee directed to submit complete development details of first phase alongwith

area chart. Phase wise list of activities alongwith corresponding area calculation

charts should be clearly mentioned and submitted for which environmental clearance

is sought. Plan for services, roads, parking, solid waste management, green/plantation,

structural safety, water management, sewage should also be provided accordingly.

8. Regarding replies submitted against query no.12, arial distance to Taj Mahal from

proposed site is 6.20 KM SW whereas distances via road is approximately 17.2 KM.

The project proponent also submitted calculation to establish that Taj Mahal from the

proposed site of Theme Park can not be visualise. So the view of Taj Mahal will not

affected by this proposed project Theme Park in Agra.

Minutes of 226th


of 44

9. Regarding replies submitted against additional queries, the project proponent

submitted an undertaking dated 29/06/2015 by Shri Suresh Kumar, Regional

Manager, UPSIDC Ltd., Agra that UP State Industrial Development Authority is

authorized to approve layout plan of area falling under UPSIDA jurisdiction

accordingly the layout plan of the project shall be approved by the competent

authority of UPSIDA before actual execution of the proposed project. The committee

discussed the matter and directed to submit approved plans to be considered by

committee. The proponent has also not provided the details of the proposed built up area block wise/building wise/activity wise which should be submitted for

consideration. Application should also be submitted to NRCD for NOC and its copy should be submitted to SEAC.

10. The project proponent also submitted that only 26 acre land is under stay from Hon'ble High Court. Efforts are being made to settle the dispute through negotiation

before commencements of the project. The committee directed to submit specific plans on this proposed 26 acres land which is under stay from Hon'ble High Court.

11. Regarding study on impact analysis on the River Yamuna, project proponent submitted that a study shall be conducted by the consultant and shall be submitted.

Project proponent also submitted that tress and old water structure shall be retained to

the maximum extent possible.

The committed directed to submit information regarding above issues

alongwith approved DPR regarding the project. The matter shall be discussed after

submission of information as above.

17. Leather Technology at B-12, Leather Technology Park, UPSIDC, Banthar, Unnao,

U.P. Sri Farhan Ajmal, M/s Calico. File No. 2575/AD-H


project fie should be closed and should be opened only after request from the project proponent. The file shall not be treated as pending at SEIAA/SEAC.

18. Tank Constructed after the year 2006, Bharat Petroleum Corp. Ltd., Mathura. T.

M. (Retail), Bharat Petrolium Corp. Ltd., Plot No-D-1, Rd No-26, UPSIDC Area,

Site-B, Mathura File No. 2624/DD-Y




19. Expansion of Existing Unit at Plot No-A-10, by incorporation Plot No-A-11 at

Lether Technology Park, Banthar, Unnao.- Sri Kamal Ahmad, Oxford Tanners,

File No. 2839/DD-Sh.


project fie should be closed and should be opened only after request from the project proponent. The file shall not be treated as pending at SEIAA/SEAC.

Minutes of 226th


of 44

20. Leather Technology Park at A-44, UPSIDC, Banthar, Unnao, U.P. M/s Naaz

Leather Finishers, Sri Javed Iqbal, A-44, Lether Tech. Park, Banthar, Unnao. File

No. 2847/SPO-V

The committee noted that an application dated 18/02/2014 received on 21/02/2015

was made by the project proponent for environmental clearance of Leather Technology Park

at A-44, UPSIDC, Banthar, Unnao, M/s Naaz Leather Finishers.

A presentation was made by Shri Rees Iqbal, Partner, authorized representative of

project proponent alongwith their consultant M/s Green Enviro Engineers Pvt. Ltd. The

proponent, through the documents submitted and the presentation made, informed the

committee that:-

1. The environmental clearance is sought for Tannery Unit M/s Naaz Leather Finishers at

A-44, UPSIDC, Leather Technology Park, Banthar, Unnao.

2. Environmental clearance for Leather Technology Park, Banthar has already been issued

by MoEF with specific condition that individual tanneries under this park shall also

seek environmental clearance.

3. Salient features of project are as follows:

Name of project Leather Processing Unit

Location at A-44, UPSIDC, Leather Technology park, Banther, Unnao , U.P

Coordinates of proposed site is

Latitude

Longitude

26°33‘45"N

80°32‘24"E

Toposheet SOI map bearing survey no. . at A-44, UPSIDC,

Leather Technology park, Banther, Unnao , U.P

Elevation 120 m amsl

Soil Alluvial deposits of quaternary sediments

Gradient 1x10

3

(1m per km)

Land Use of proposed project Industrial area, UPSIDC, Unnao

Products Raw leather to Finished Leather

Land area 5034 sqm (1.24 Acre)

Size/ Capacity of project 180 Hides/day (3600 kg)

Raw Material Hides / Skin

Source of water Ground water

Waste water generation 110 KLD

ETP Capacity Primary treatment plant 120 KLD

Landscape area 1717 (33%)

No. of trees proposed 35

4. Details of raw materials/chemicals:

Sr. No. Name of Raw Material Daily Capacity

01 Raw Hide 3600 KG

02 Sodium Format 45 kg/day

03 BCS 220 kg/day

04 Synthetic Tanning Agents 180 kg/day

06 . Fat Liquors 220 kg/day

07 Dyes 45 kgs/day

08 Binders 65 kgs/day

09 Pigments 5 kg/day

10 Top coats 75 kg/day

11 Wax Emulsions 10 kg/day

12 Feel Modifiers 2/3 kg/day

5. Water balance diagram is as follows:

Minutes of 226th


of 44

6. Approximately, 120 cum/day ground water is proposed to be used for the project, out of

which 05 cum/day for boiler feed, 110 cum/day for industrial process, 1-2 cum/day domestic uses and 5-10 cum/day for green belt development is proposed.

7. Tannery unit is a member of Banthar Industrial Pollution Control Company and there are no dues are pending.

8. Solid waste generation details and disposal plan is as follows: S.N. Type of Waste Quantity Generation

(MT/Month)

Utilization / Disposal Plan

1. Coal Ash (Generated through

Boiler)

5 - 10 Utilization for as per fly ash rule.

2. ETP sludge 3- 5 Dispose through TSDF site Establish in

side premises or (UP waste management

Project) registration completed.

3. Used Oil

(Generated through stand by DG

set)

50 liter/Month Partial used in Boiler and partial sell to

register recycler.

4. Small pieces of leather 3- 5 • Smaller particle (saver dust) will sell to feeder and fertilizer industry.

• Bigger part will sell to end user.

9. Tannery unit has taken provisional membership of Uttar Pradesh Waste Management

Project, M/s Ramky Envior Engineers Pvt. Ltd. regarding disposal of hazardous waste.

10. Approximately, 1717 sqm area is proposed as green belt which is approx. 34% of total

plot area 5034 sqm.

11. The project proposals are covered under category 4"f" of EIA Notification, 2006 as

amended.

The committee discussed the matter and directed to submit following information:

1. No construction/no production affidavit by the project proponent.

2. Site plan/building plan as approved by UPSIDC.

3. Setback details.

4. Details about coal quantity to be consumed as fuel.

5. Proposal with supporting documents regarding establishment of multi cyclone

dust collector.

Minutes of 226th


of 44

6. Design for primary treatment to achieve standards for input of CETP.

7. Plan for solar evaporation plant.

8. Plan for separate industrial and storm water drainage. All drains shall be

covered.

9. 33% of plot area should be developed as green belt. Plan should be submitted.

10. Plan for flow meters at outlet and H2S monitors.

11. Project cost and CSR details.


21. "Bio Medical Waste Treatment Facility" at Village-Banka, Tehsil-Post,

Bahadurganj, District-Ghazipur, Uttar Pradesh, M/s Silkon Welfare Society, Sri

Vinay Kumar Rai,3, Kanchanpur, DLW, Varanasi. File No. 2878/OSD-T

The committee noted that an undated application received on 03/03/2015 was made

by the project proponent for environmental clearance of "Bio Medical Waste Treatment

Facility" at Village-Banka, Tehsil-Post, Bahadurganj, District-Ghazipur, Uttar Pradesh, M/s

Silkon Welfare Society.

A presentation was made by Shri Vinay Rai, representative of project proponent

alongwith their consultant M/s Perfact Enviro Solutions Pvt. Ltd. The proponent, through the

documents submitted and the presentation made, informed the committee that:-

1. The Environmental Clearance is sought for "Bio Medical Waste Treatment Facility"

at Village-Banka, Tehsil-Post, Bahadurganj, District-Ghazipur, Uttar Pradesh, M/s

Silkon Welfare Society.

2. Salient features of the project are as follows:

Sl. No Description Details

1 Plot Area (sq m) 1,600 Sqm

2 Built up Area (sq m) 1,125 Sqm

3 Total capacity of Plant

Incinerator Capacity

Autoclave capacity

Plastic shredder capacity

5 tons/day

1 ton/ day

2 ton/ day

1.5 tons/ day

4 Water Requirement (KLD) 8 KLD

5 Source of Water Ground water

6

ETP 10 KLD

7 Power Requirement (KVA) 30 KVA

8 Source of Power Purvanchal Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Limited (PVVNL)

9 Backup Power

(Source & Capacity)

1× 62.5 KVA (1× 62.5 KVA as a standby)

3. Land use details are as follows:

Area in Sqm % Area

Work shed 1050 66

Office block 50 3

D.G room 25 1

Green belt 250 16

Open space 200 12

Guard room 25 2

Total 1600 100

4. Water requirement and waste water generation details as follows:

Particulars Water Requirement Waste Water Discharge (in KLD)

Washing 5 KLD 4.2 KLD

Wet Scrubber 0.5 KLD

Minutes of 226th


of 44

Boiler 0.5 KLD

Domestic Use 2 KLD 1.8 KLD

Total 8 KLD 6 KLD

5. Source of waste details:

� Major sources

• Hospitals/nursing homes/ dispensaries.

• Primary health centers.

• Medical colleges and research centers/ paramedic services.

� Minor sources

• Physicians/ dentists’ clinics

• Blood donation camps

6. Proposed activities of the project as follows:

� Collection

• Segregated waste shall be collected in the different colour coded liners placed

in bins or in coloured plastic bins as Yellow, Red, Blue and Black.

• Door to door collection facility will be provide to health care units.

� Transportation

• Waste shall be transported by 10 fully covered specially designed vehicle (as

per the guidelines of CPCB).

• Separate cabins for driver/staff and the bio medical waste.

• The vehicles will be properly labelled with the symbol of Biohazard as per

schedule III of the Rules and will display the name, address and telephone

number of the Company.

• The inner surface of the waste cabin will be made of smooth surface to

minimize water retention.

• The waste cabin will have provision for sufficient opening from rear side so

that Bio Medical Waste can be easily loaded and unloaded.

• The vehicles will be provided with the first aid kit to handle emergency

situations.

• Mobile phones will be given at all the vehicles for effective supervision and

monitoring of collection and transportation work.

� Treatment

• 3 types of treatment will be provide in biomedical waste management facility-

Incineration, Autoclaving & Shredder.

• Separate rooms for all the three equipments will be made.

� Final Disposal

• Plastic waste after disinfection and shredding will be handed over to

authorized plastic waste recycler.

• Disinfected sharps will be encapsulated on site.

• A non leachate and covered ash pit will be provided inside the CBWTF for

deep burial of Incineration ash.

• Final waste, i.e. incinerated ash will be dumped in the deep burial unit.

7. Category details of bio medical waste :

Option Waste Category Treatment & Disposal

Category No. 1 Human Anatomical Waste Incineration /deep burial

Minutes of 226th


of 44

(human tissues, organs, body parts)

Category No. 2 Animal Waste

(animal tissues, organs, body parts carcasses, bleeding

parts, fluid, blood and experimental animals used in

research, waste generated by veterinary hospitals,

colleges, discharge from hospitals, animal houses)

Incineration/deep burial

Category No. 3 Microbiology & Biotechnology Waste

(Wastes from laboratory cultures, stocks or micro-

organisms live or vaccines, human and animal cell

culture used in research and infectious agents from

research and industrial laboratories, wastes from

production of biologicals, toxins, dishes and devices used

for transfer of cultures)

Local autoclaving/micro-

waving/incineration

Category No. 4 Waste Sharps (needles, syringes, scalpels, blade, glass, etc. that may

cause punture and cuts. This includes both used and

unused sharps)

Disinfection (chemical treatment)/ autoclaving/

microwaving and mutilation/

shredding

Category No. 5 Discarded Medicines and Cytotoxic drugs

(Waste comprising of outdated, contaminated and

discarded medicines)

Incineration/ destruction and

drugs disposal in secured

landfills

Category No. 6 Soiled Waste

(items contaminated with blood, and body fluids

including cotton, dressings, soiled plaster casts, lines,

bedding, other material contaminated with blood)

Incineration/ autoclaving/

microwaving

Category No. 7 Solid Waste

(Waste generated from disposal items other than the

sharps such a tubings, catheters, intravenous sets etc.)

Disinfection by chemical

treatment/ autoclaving/

microwaving and

mutilation/shredding

Category No. 8 Liquid Waste (Waste generated from laboratory and washing, cleaning,

housekeeping and disinfecting activities)

Disinfection by chemical treatment and discharge into

drains

Category No. 9 Incineration Ash

Ash from incineration of any bio-medical waste)

Disposal in municipal

landfill

Category No. 10 Chemical Waste

(Chemicals used in production of biologicals, chemicals

used in production of biologicals, chemicals used in

disinfection, as insectricides, etc.)

Chemical treatment and

discharge into drains for

liquids and secured landfill

for solids

8. Wastes management details are as follows:

� Industrial waste management:

• Incineration Ash will be generated as end product which will be dumped into

deep burial.

• Plastic bottles treated from plastic shredder will be given to the recyclers.

• Glass bottles shall be sold to recycler.

• Sharps will be treated in autoclave.

� Municipal Solid waste management:

• 7.5 kg/day solid waste will generate from 50 persons who will be engaged as

staff in operation phase.

• MSW from staff will be treated in Organic waste convertor.

� Hazardous waste management:

• Used oil from the D.G set and incinerator will be collected in black colour

coded plastic container.

• Waste shall be collected in the leak proof containers at isolated place and then

it will be given to approve vendor of CPCB as per hazardous waste rules,

2011.

9. The project proposal falls under category 7(da) of EIA Notification, 2006 (as

amended).

Minutes of 226th


of 44

The committee discussed the matter and recommended following TORs for

conducting EIA studies regarding the proposals in view of amendment in EIA Notification

dated 17/04/2015:

Additional TORs :

1. Executive summary of the project – giving a prima facie idea of the objectives of the

proposal, use of resources, justification, etc. In addition, it should provide EMP. 2. Justification for selecting the proposed capacity of the incineration facility.

3. Status of project with reference to guidelines of CPCB regarding establishment of Bio Medical Waste Disposal Facilities.

4. Establishment of the facility as per Bio Medial Waste (Management & Handling) Rules 1998 (as amended).

5. Land requirement for the facility including its break up for various purposes, its availability and optimization.

6. Details of proposed layout clearly demarcating various activities such as security,

7. Waste Storage Rooms, Waste Treatment Equipment Rooms/Areas, Treated Waste

Storage Room, Pollution Control Devices like APCS and ETP, ash storage/disposal

area, vehicle washing areas, and others such as admin area, worker’s room, health

centers, greenbelt, etc.

8. Details on collection and transportation of Bio Medical Waste from health care

establishments. No. of vehicles and feature of vehicles, etc.

9. Details of waste storage facilities/rooms.

10. Treated water to be recycled and Commitment of zero discharge is to be submitted.

11. Details of the treatment equipment’s capacity and make.

12. Details of the incineration system – a statement on the compliance to the CPCB

guidelines for common bio medical waste incinerators in respect of waste feed

cutoffs, operating parameters of combustion chambers, flue gas cleaning, ash handling, etc.

13. Details on fuel requirement for incineration. 14. Details on flue gas emissions discharge through stack and proposed pollution control

technologies. 15. Details on residue/ash generation and management.

16. Details of waste heat utilization, if any. 17. Details on wastewater management alongwith zero discharge plans as committed by

the project proponent.

18. Details of the proposed overall safety and health protection measures.

19. Details on source of water and power to the facility.

20. Details of the existing access road(s)/walkways to the designed operations in the site

and its layout.

21. Location of the incineration facility and nearest habitats with distances from the

facility to be demarcated on a toposheet (1: 50000 scale).

22. Landuse map based on satellite imagery including location specific sensitivities such

as national parks / wildlife sanctuary, villages, industries, etc.

23. Topography details.

24. Surface water quality of nearby water bodies.

25. Details on proposed groundwater monitoring wells, locations, frequency of

monitoring, parameters, etc. 26. Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary provision

amounting to 2% of total project cost shall be prepared and approved by Board of Directors of the company. A copy of resolution as above shall be submitted to the

authority alongwith list of beneficiaries with their mobile nos./address.

27. Action plan for the greenbelt development in accordance to CPCB published

guidelines.

Minutes of 226th


of 44

28. Details on pollution control technologies and online monitoring equipments.

29. Details on monitoring of pollutants at source –performance of the incinerator.

including operating hours, fuel consumption, operating parameters (Combustion

chamber – temperature, pressure, Stack temperature, total particulate matter, HCl,

NOx as per Bio Medial Waste (Management & Handling) Rules 1998.

30. Stack and fugitive emissions may be monitored for SPM, HCL & NO2 as per Bio

Medial Waste (Management & Handling) Rules 1998.

31. Specific programme to monitor safety and health protection of workers. 32. Details of Administrative and technical organizational structure.

33. EMP devised to mitigate the adverse impacts of the project should be provided along with item-wise cost of its implementation (Capital and recurring costs).

34. Details of the emergency preparedness plan and on-site & off-site disaster management plan.

35. Affidavit to be submitted for the actual surveys done with detailed photographs of

monitoring etc.

The final EIA report after incorporation of public hearing observations/comments

should be submitted to the committee for further consideration of the matter.

22. Group Housing Project “Ozone Classic” at Khasra No-823, 826, Vill-Noor Nagar,

Ghziabad & Khasra No- 834, 835, 838 TO 843, Vill-Saddik Nagar, Ghaziabad. File

No. 3137/DD-Sh.


project file should be closed and should be opened only after request from the project


23. “ATS Le Grandiose” at Plot No-SC-01/C-A1, Sports City, Sector-150, Noida. Sri S.J.

Raza, Flat No-G-25, Block-C,4, Gaur Global Village, Ghaziabad. File No. 3192/DD-

Sh.


proponent for environmental clearance of Group Housing Project “ATS LE Grandiose” at

Plot No-SC-01/C-A1, Sports City, Sector-150, Noida, M/s Nobility Estates Pvt. Ltd.

A presentation was made by Shri Varun Juneja, representative of project proponent

alongwith their consultant M/s J M Enviro Net Pvt. Ltd. The proponent, through the


1. The Environmental Clearance is sought for Group Housing Project “ATS LE

Grandiose” at Plot No-SC-01/C-A1, Sports City, Sector-150, Noida, M/s M/s

Nobility Estates Pvt. Ltd.

2. Salient features of the project as follows:

PROJECT DETAILS DESCRIPTION

Project name “ATS LE GRANDIOSE” of M/s Nobility Estates Pvt. Ltd.

Type of project Building Construction Project

Total Plot area 80937.130 sq. m.

Built-up area 224595.10 sq. m

{F.A.R (12531.384 sq. m) + Non F.A.R (17946.081 sq. m) + Basement

(86117.64 sq. m)}

Ground coverage Permissible: 22942.400 sq.m

Proposed: 9753.029 sq. m

F.A.R. Permissible: 121405.695 sq. m

Proposed: 120531.384 sq. m

Maximum Building height 86.50 Meters

Minutes of 226th


of 44

No. of floors & basements 2 Basement + Ground Floor + 24 Upper Floors

No. of dwelling units Main Dwelling Units – 806

Parking facilities Required Parking- 1518 ECS

Provided Parking- 1779 ECS

Power requirement & source 4034.668 KW

Source :- Local grid supply of Noida

Power backup 4 D. G of total capacity 3780 KVA (3 X 1010 KVA + 1 X 750 KVA)

Water requirement & source Water requirement will be 599 KLD

Fresh Water : 298 KLD

Recycled Water: 301 KLD

Source: Municipal Water supply & Private Water Tankers Supply

Capacity of STP 450 KLD

Solid wastes generation Total solid waste - 2077 kg/day

(Residential – 1813.50 kg/day + Floating – 264.25 kg/day)

Estimated population 5087 Persons

(Resident: 4030 Persons + Floating- 1057 Persons)

Green-area 39786.95 sq. m (49.15%)

Rain water harvesting pits 08 nos.

3. Tower wise details of the project are as follows:

S. No. Tower Floors Flats per Floor Total no. of Flats/Units

1 Tower No. 5 (Type B’) 2B+G+4 2 8

2 Tower No. 6 (Type A) 2B+G+23 2 46



5 Tower No. 9 (Type B) 2B+G+23 2 46

6 Tower No. 10 (Type B) 2B+G+23 2 46

7 Tower No. 11 (Type C) 2B+G+24 G.F.-2, 1 to21 – 3, 22to24-2 71








TOTAL UNITS / Flats 806

4. Water calculation details are as follows:

S.

No.

Particulars Expected

Population

Base of

Calculation

(lpcd)

Water

For

Flushing

Purpose

(KLD)

Water

Required For

Domestic

Purpose

(KLD)

Total Water

Consumption

(KLD)

1. Dwelling Units

(806)

4030

@ 5 persons/unit

86 84.63 261.95 346.58

2. Visitors 403

@ 10% of the population

15 5.64 0.40 6.04

3. Club & Facilities 654

@ 3 sq. m. per

person

15 9.15 0.65 9.80

4. Green Belt

(39786.95 SQ. M)

- @ 5.1

Lit / sq. m.

- - 202.00

5. Filter Back wash - - - - 25.00

6. Water Body - - - - 10.00

Total 5087 99.42 say

99 KLD

263 KLD 599 KLD

5. The project proposal falls under category 8(b) of EIA Notification, 2006 (as

amended).

The committee discussed the matter and recommended following TORs and general

guidelines for conducting EIA studies regarding the proposals:

Minutes of 226th


of 44

Additional TORs :

1. Master plan of the area showing proposed project.

2. Submit approved layout plan.

3. Permissible uses of the proposed site as per zoning regulation.

4. Allotment letter from concerned development authority.

5. Physical features within 30 m of the project sites with their ownership.

6. Section details of all road. All roads width to be written with carriage and Right of

way.

7. Setback details/dimensions alongwith map.



9. Land use approved by the competent authority.

10. Complete Details of facilities to be developed by the project proponent i.e. for which

environment clearance is sought.

11. Use of reflecting paints on roof top and side walls.

12. Details of rain water harvesting are to be given. Underground water tank provision

may be made for storage of storm water.


14. A site plan showing the project site and its surroundings with physical features and

topographical details, such as land use, contours and drainage pattern, along with

photographs of the site from all four sides, should be included in the background

information.

15. 10% EWS / LIG housing provision shall be made as per Development Authority bye-

laws.

16. Sanctioned plans/maps regarding the project with all services plans.

17. All plans and elevation sections/all service plan/landscape plan/standard

electrification plan/drainage/sewerage plan.

18. Structural plan is to be submitted signed by qualified structural designer.

19. All service plans like sewer drainage water supply rain water harvesting fire fighting

landscape plan is to be submitted.

20. Examine in detail the proposed site with reference to impact on infrastructure

covering water supply, storm water drainage, sewerage, power, etc., and the disposal

of treated/raw wastes from the complex on land/water body and into sewerage system.

21. Water requirement and water management plan alongwith necessary permissions for

discharge. The water consumption may be made more realistic based on reliable data.

Similarly the waste water calculation should be based on factual facts supported by

the authentic data.

22. Hydro-geological investigations be carried out and obtain permission from Central

Ground Water Authority for withdrawal of ground water.

23. Consider soil characteristics and permeability for rainwater harvesting proposals,

should be made to prevent ground water contamination. Maximize use of treated

water by recycling and utilization of rainwater.

24. Make provision for safety against failure in the operation of wastewater treatment

facilities. Identify acceptable outfall for treated effluent.

25. Details of green belt as a measure for mitigation of dust and noise and buffer between

habitation and proposed project.

Minutes of 226th


of 44

26. Landscape plan, green belts and open spaces may be described separately.

27. Study the existing flora and fauna of the area and the impact of the project on them.

28. Examine existing crèche, education, health facilities, police, post Office, Banks and

other services and make adequate provisions in the proposal.

29. Assess soil erosion in view of the soil characteristics, topography and rainfall pattern.

30. Application of renewable energy/alternate energy, such as solar and wind energy may

be described including solar water heating in the guidelines for entrepreneurs.

31. Consider solid wastes, including e-waste in addition to other solid wastes and their

disposal.

32. Identification of recyclable wastes and waste utilization arrangements may be made.

33. Explore possibility of generating biogas from biodegradable wastes.

34. Arrangements for hazardous waste management may be described as also the

common facilities for waste collection, treatment, recycling and disposal of all

effluent, emission and refuse including MSW, biomedical and hazardous wastes.

Special attention should be made with respect to bird menace.

35. Provisions made for safety in storage of materials, products and wastes may be

described.

36. Disaster management plan should be prepared.

37. Traffic management plan including parking and loading/unloading areas may be

described. Traffic survey should be carried out both on weekdays and weekend.

38. Parking provision is to be made for higher ECS worked out either as per state bye-

laws or construction manual of the MoEF

39. Exclusive Parking area in the basement (excluding other facilities) and surface is to be

clearly mentioned

40. Provide service road for entry and exit to project site.

41. Use of local building materials should be described.

42. Consider provision of DG Flue Gas emissions to be treated in a scrubber. Stack

details with provisos of sampling port for monitoring be described.

43. Work out MGLC for the combined capacity of DG sets.

44. Provide for conservation of resources, energy efficiency and use of renewable sources

of energy in the light of ECBC code.

45. Application of resettlement and rehabilitation policy may be described. Project

affected persons should be identified and rehabilitation and resettlement plan should

be prepared.

46. Examine separately the details for construction and operation phases both for

Environmental Management Plan and Environmental Monitoring Plan.

47. Environment Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary provision of

minimum 2% of the project cost as discussed in meeting shall be submitted on need

base assessment study in the study area.

48. Details of all internal and peripheral roads width.

49. Source and quantity of required water during construction and management of

generated waste water.

50. Project falling with in 10 Km. area of Wild Life Sanctuary is to obtain a clearance

from National Board Wild Life (NBWL) even if the eco- sensitive zone is not

earmarked.

Minutes of 226th


of 44

51. Declare/submit the running cost of STP and other environmental management

services (e.g., Municipal Solid Waste Disposal, Green belt Maintenance, Water

Management etc.) in the proposals which are to be including in the allotment letters.

52. The proponent will submit the schedule of monitoring/data collection programme to

the Office of Directorate, Member Secretary, UP Pollution Control Board and District

Magistrate of related District.

General Guidelines:

a. A legal affidavit by the Project proponent on Rs. 100/- non-judicial Stamp Paper, duly

attested by Public Notary, stating that:

I. “There is no litigation pending against the project and/or land in which the project is

proposed to be set up (please give name & ownership etc. of the project) and that for

any such litigation what so ever, the sole responsibility will be borne by the Project

proponent.”

II. “No activity relating to this project (i.e. name of the project) including civil

construction has been undertaken at site except fencing of the site to protect it from

getting encroached and construction of temporary shed(s) for the guard(s). (if fencing

has not been done, then the same may be deleted).

III. “I/We hereby give undertaking that the data and information given in the application,

enclosures and other documents are true to the best of my knowledge and belief and

I/We am/are aware that if any part of the data and information submitted is found to

be false or misleading at any stage, the project will be rejected and clearance given,

if any to the Project will be revoked at our risk and cost.”

IV. Project does not fall under any buffer zone of no-development as declared /identified

under any law.

b. Another legal affidavit by the consultant stating “(a) that the prescribed TORs have been

complied with (to be deleted if not applicable) & (b) that details and the data presented

are factually correct”, as per MoEF circular dated 04.08.2009 is also to be submitted

along with EIA.

c. Current, site photographs viewing towards the project area from four directions

indicating date of photograph taken, direction from which taken, name of the project,

and signature of Project proponent along with consultant with seal should be submitted,

so as to ensure that no construction has been started before the grant of EC.

d. EIA should strictly follow the guidelines prescribed in annexure-III to the EIA

notification of 2006 and the Methods of Monitoring and analysis (Annexure-IV):

Guidance for assessment of representativeness and reliability of baseline environmental

attributes detailed under EIA manual January, 2001 and other guidelines in the matter.

e. The status of accreditation of the EIA consultant with NABET/QCI shall be specifically

mentioned. The consultant shall certify that his accreditation is for the sector for which

this EIA is prepared.

f. On the front page of EIA/EMP reports, the name of the consultant/consultancy firm

along with their complete details including their accreditation, if any shall be indicated.

g. While submitting the EIA/EMP reports, the name of the experts associated

with/involved in the preparation of these reports and the Name of laboratory through

which the samples have been got analysed should be stated in the report. It shall clearly

be indicated whether said laboratory is accredited by NABL or approved under the

Minutes of 226th


of 44

Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (Please refer MoEF office memorandum dated 4th

August, 2009). The name project leader of the EIA study shall also be mentioned.

h. The EIA document shall be printed on both sides, as for as possible.

i. Affidavit to be submitted for the actual surveys done with detailed photographs of

monitoring etc.

The Information’s no (a I , II, III & c) asked under the general guidelines is to be

submitted within 15 days from the date of receipt of the letter and remaining of the

information’s is to be submitted along with the EIA

24. Revision of Environmental Clearance “ATS Pristine” at Plot No-SC-01/A-1, Sports

City, Sector-150, Noida. Sri S.J. Raza, Flat No-G-25, Ground Floor, Block-C,4, Gaur

Global Village, Ghaziabad. File No. 3193/DD-Y


proponent for environmental clearance for Revision of Environmental Clearance “ATS

Pristine” at Plot No-SC-01/A-1, Sports City, Sector-150, Noida, M/s M/s Assertive

Infrastructure Private Ltd.

A presentation was made by Shri Varun Juneja, representative of project proponent

alongwith their consultant M/s J M Enviro Net Pvt. Ltd. The proponent, through the


1. The Environmental Clearance is sought for Revision of Environmental Clearance

“ATS Pristine” at Plot No-SC-01/A-1, Sports City, Sector-150, Noida, M/s

Assertive Infrastructure Private Ltd.

2. The Environmental Clearance for the earlier project “ATS Pristine” at Plot No. SC-

01/A-1, Sector 150, Gautam Buddha Nagar, Noida, Uttar Pradesh was issued by

SEIAA, UP vide letter no. 1792/Parya/SEAC/1624/2013/TAJ dated 12/10/2013.


Sr.

No.

Particulars Details

1. Project area (sq. m.) 93072.00 sq. m.

2. Built up (sq. m.) 288060 sq.m.

(FAR: 184013.72 + Non FAR: 27306.18 + Basement: 76650.72)

3. Permissible F.A.R 186059.130 @2.0

Proposed F.A.R 184103.725 @1.98

4. Permissible Ground

coverage(sq.m.)

27921.60 (30.00%)

Proposed Ground coverage(sq.m.) 19198.181 (20.62%)

5. Maximum No. of Floors Basement + G + 24

6. Number of Towers 17

7. Main Dwelling Unit 1068

8. Service Personal Unit 220

10. Building height (m) 83.32

Parking Required (in ECS) 2326

11. Parking Provided (in ECS) 2507

12. STP Capacity (KLD) 500+200KLD

13. Power Requirement 5020.75 KVA

14. DG Set & Capacity 4 DG of total capacity 3655 KVA

[(3 X 1010 KVA) + (1 X 625 KVA)]

15. Population (No of Persons) Total Population – 7780

(Residential– 6220 Plus Floating – 1560)

16. Solid Waste Generation (kg /day) 3189 kg/day (Residential: 2799.00 kg/day; Floating: 390.00 kg/day)

Minutes of 226th


of 44

17. RWH pits (no.) Provided 14

18 Green Area (sq. m.) 36936.00 sq. m

4. Comparative details for earlier project and proposed project are as follows: S.

No.

Particulars Post Planning Detail as

EC Received

Proposed Modification Total Entire Project

Changes

1. Project area (sq. m.) 93072.00 sq. m. 93072.00 sq. m. No Change

2 Built up (sq. m) 230546.617 sq. m.

(F. A. R- 138732.662 +

Non F. A. R- 19757.719

+ Basement -

72056.236)

288060.004 sq.m.

(F. A. R- 184013.725 +

Non F. A. R- 27306.185

+ Basement –

76650.724)

+ 57513.387

3 F. A. R Permissible 139608.00 sq. m. (1.5%)

186059.130 (2.0%) + 46451.13

F. A. R Proposed 138732.662 sq. m.

(1.4%)

184103.725 (1.98%) + 45371.063

4. Ground coverage (sq.

m.)

Permissible

27921.60 (30%) 27921.60 (30%) No Change

G. C Proposed 16051.102 (17.24%) 19198.181 (20.63%) + 3147.079

5. Maximum No. of

Floors

Basement + G + 24 Basement + G + 24 No Change

6. Main Dwelling Unit 727 1068 + 341

7. Service Personal Unit 283 220 - 63

8. Number of Towers 13 17 + 4

9. Building height (m) 83.32 83.32 No Change

10. Parking Required (in

ECS)

2081 2326 +245

Parking Provided (in

ECS)

2201 2507 +306

11. STP (KLD) 500 KLD 500+200 KLD + 200 KLD

12. Water Requirement &

Source

Total – 585 KLD

Fresh – 349 KLD

Recycled- 236 KLD

Total – 704 KLD

Fresh – 441 KLD

Recycled- 263 KLD

Total =(+ 119 KLD)

Fresh =(+ 92 KLD)

Recycled =(+ 27 KLD)

13. Population (No of

Person)

Total: 6224

Residential: 4805

Floating:1419

Total: 7780

Residential: 6220

Floating:1560

Total: + 1556

Residential: +1415

Floating:+141

14. Solid waste generation

(kg /day)

2517 kg/day

(Residential: 2162.25

kg/day; Floating: 354.75

kg/day)

3189 kg/day

(Residential: 2799

kg/day; Floating: 390

kg/day)

672 kg/day

(Residential: 636.75

kg/day; Floating: 35.25

kg/day)

15. RWH pits (no.)

Provided

22 14 - 8 R.W.H Pit

16. Green Area (Sq. m.) 38510.449 (41.37%) 36936 (39.68%) - 1574.449

5. Water requirement details of the proejct are as follows: S.

No.

Particulars Expected

Population

Base of

Calculation

(lpcd)

Water For

Flushing

Purpose (KLD)

Water

Required For

Domestic Purpose

(KLD)

Total Water

Consumption

(KLD)

1. Dwelling Units

(1068)

5340

@ 5 persons/du

86 112.14 347.10 459.24

2. Service

Personal Units

(220)

880

@ 4 persons/du

86 18.48 57.20 75.68

5. Visitors 622

@ 10% of the

population

15 8.70 0.62 9.32

6. Club &

Facilities

938

L.S

15 13.13 0.93 14.06

7. Green Belt

(36936 sq. m.)

- @ 3

Lit / sq. m.

111.00

8. Filter Back - 25.00

Minutes of 226th


of 44

wash

9. Water Body 10.00

Total 7780 152.45

say 152

405.85

say 406

704 KLD

6. The project proposal falls under category 8(b) of EIA Notification, 2006 (as

amended).



Additional TORs :







way.



8. Land use approved by the competent authority.

9. Complete Details of facilities to be developed by the project proponent i.e. for which

environment clearance is sought.

10. Use of reflecting paints on roof top and side walls.

11. Details of rain water harvesting are to be given.


13. A site plan showing the project site and its surroundings with physical features and



information.


laws.




17. Structural plan is to be submitted signed by qualified structural designer.



19. Examine in detail the proposed site with reference to impact on infrastructure

covering water supply, storm water drainage, sewerage, power, etc., and the disposal

of treated/raw wastes from the complex on land/water body and into sewerage system.

20. Water requirement and water management plan alongwith necessary permissions for

discharge. The water consumption may be made more realistic based on reliable data.

Similarly the waste water calculation should be based on factual facts supported by

the authentic data.




Minutes of 226th


of 44





24. Details of green belt as a measure for mitigation of dust and noise and buffer between

habitation and proposed project.

25. Landscape plan, green belts and open spaces may be described separately.

26. Study the existing flora and fauna of the area and the impact of the project on them.

27. Examine existing crèche, education, health facilities, police, post Office, Banks and

other services and make adequate provisions in the proposal.

28. Assess soil erosion in view of the soil characteristics, topography and rainfall pattern.

29. Application of renewable energy/alternate energy, such as solar and wind energy may

be described including solar water heating in the guidelines for entrepreneurs.

30. Consider solid wastes, including e-waste in addition to other solid wastes and their

disposal.








described.


36. Traffic management plan including parking and loading/unloading areas may be

described. Traffic survey should be carried out both on weekdays and weekend.

37. Parking provision is to be made for higher ECS worked out either as per state bye-

laws or construction manual of the MoEF

38. Exclusive Parking area in the basement (excluding other facilities) and surface is to be

clearly mentioned

39. Provide service road for entry and exit to project site.

40. Use of local building materials should be described.

41. Consider provision of DG Flue Gas emissions to be treated in a scrubber. Stack







be prepared.




minimum 2% of the project cost as discussed in meeting shall be submitted on need

base assessment study in the study area.

47. Details of all internal and peripheral roads width.

Minutes of 226th


of 44

48. Source and quantity of required water during construction and management of

generated waste water.

49. Project falling with in 10 Km. area of Wild Life Sanctuary is to obtain a clearance


earmarked.




51. Detailed plan of solid waste management with name and address of authorized

vendors to be submitted.


the Office of Directorate, Member Secretary, UP Pollution Control Board and District

Magistrate of related District.

General Guidelines:

a. A legal affidavit by the Project proponent on Rs. 100/- non-judicial Stamp Paper, duly

attested by Public Notary, stating that:

I. “There is no litigation pending against the project and/or land in which the project is

proposed to be set up (please give name & ownership etc. of the project) and that for


proponent.”









if any to the Project will be revoked at our risk and cost.”

IV. Project does not fall under any buffer zone of no-development as declared /identified

under any law.




along with EIA.










mentioned. The consultant shall certify that his accreditation is for the sector for which

this EIA is prepared.

Minutes of 226th


of 44

f. On the front page of EIA/EMP reports, the name of the consultant/consultancy firm

along with their complete details including their accreditation, if any shall be indicated.

g. While submitting the EIA/EMP reports, the name of the experts associated

with/involved in the preparation of these reports and the Name of laboratory through

which the samples have been got analysed should be stated in the report. It shall clearly

be indicated whether said laboratory is accredited by NABL or approved under the





monitoring etc.




25. Building for Integrated "Healthcare Campus" at Plot No-04, Institutional Green,

Greater Noida, M/s ICare Health Projects & Research Pvt. Ltd., Sri K S

Ramsinghaney, CEO, Max House, File No. 2798/OSD-T

The committee noted that an undated application received on 30/01/2015 was made

by the project proponent for environmental clearance of Building for Integrated "Healthcare

Campus" at Plot No-04, Institutional Green, Greater Noida, M/s I Care Health Projects &

Research Pvt. Ltd.

A presentation was made by Shri Anil Kumar Mishra, representative of project

proponent alongwith their consultant M/s ENV DAS India Pvt. Ltd. The proponent, through

the documents submitted and the presentation made, informed the committee that:-

1. The Environmental Clearance is sought Building for Integrated "Healthcare

Campus" at Plot No-04, Institutional Green, Greater Noida, M/s I Care Health

Projects & Research Pvt. Ltd.


AREA STATEMENT

Type of Building Institutional

Plot Area 118572.89 m2

(29.30 Acre)

Green Belt Area (25% of the plot area) 29643.22 m2

(7.325 Acre)

Total Buildable Area 88929.66 m2

(21.975 Acre)

Permissible Ground Coverage (35% of Buildable area) 31125.381 m2

Achieved Ground Coverage (16%) 14231.05 m2

Permissible FAR (0.8 of Buildable Area) 71143.73 m2

Achieved FAR (0.75 of Buildable Area) 66395.47 m2

Non FAR

Basement (Block 1)

Basement (Block 2)

13000 m2

13000 m2

Built up Area 92396 m2

Open Area including road & parking and green belt 104341.84 m2

Minutes of 226th


of 44

Landscape Area 44584 m2

(38% of plot area)

Number of Trees Required (One tree per 80 m2

of open

space)

Number of Trees Provided

1043

1500

Parking Facilities Required: 1446 ECS

Provided: 1454 ECS

Power Requirement and Source

Backup Power

5000 kVA

Source of Power: Electricity Board (UPSEB)

Back up DG sets

(as per requirement) 4 no. DG Sets (each 1250

kVA

Estimated Population Residential – 750

Hostel – 200

Commercial Staff - 500

Visitors - 5000

Hospital- 200 beds

Rain water harvesting pits 04 nos.

3. Water requirement details are as follows:

S.No. Description Total Occupancy Rate of water

demand (lpcd)

Water Requirement

(KLD)

A. Domestic Consumption

1 Residential 750 86 65

Staff 50 45 2.5

B. Other Consumption

1. Commercial Block

Staff 200 45 09

2. Hostel Block

Occupancy 200 86 17

Staff 50 45 2.5

3. Visitors 4500 15 68

Total Domestic Water Demand (A+B) 164

4. Hospital

200 Beds 200 450 90

Staff 200 45 09

Visitors 500 15 8

Total Hospital Water Demand 107

C. Landscaping 44584 m2

1.0 lt/m2

45

D. HVAC (2000 TR), 15 hrs 9 lt/hr/Tr 62*

E. DG Cooling (1250 x 4) kVA, 4

hrs

0.9 lt/kVA/hr 18

Total Water Demand (A+B+C+D+E) 396

Domestic Hospital

Total water demand 396 KLD

Fresh water demand (KLD) 164 KLD 107 KLD

Waste water generation (KLD) 148 KLD 96 KLD

STP/ ETP Capacity (accounting 20% extra) 180 KLD 120 KLD

Recycled water (KLD) 125 KLD

Landscaped development (KLD) 45 KLD

DG set cooling (KLD) 18 KLD

HVAC Makeup water (KLD) 62 KLD

STP Capacity

ETP Capacity

180 KLD (above 20% higher capacity) 120 KLD (above 20%

higher capacity)

Process of STP FAB

Location of STP Open

4.Solid waste generation details are as follows:

Facilities Provided Waste generation norms per unit

Basis of Assumption

Unit Total Waste Generated

Minutes of 226th


of 44

(MT/day )

Residential 0.30-0.6 kg/cap/day

(i.e. 0.50

kg/cap/day taken)

Source: Manual for

municipal solid

waste management

750 persons 0.38

Hostel 0.30-0.6 kg/cap/day

(i.e. 0.50

kg/cap/day taken)

Source: Manual for

municipal solid

waste management

200 persons 0.10

Visitors 0.15 kg/cap/day Source: Manual for

municipal solid

waste management

5000 persons 0.75

Staff 0.15 kg/cap/day Source: Manual for

municipal solid

waste management

500 persons 0.08

Hospital (assuming

200 bedded

hospital)

Bio medical waste

(0.38 kg/bed/day)

Source: Manual for

municipal solid

waste management

200 beds 0.076

General hospital waste (1.25

/bed/day)

Source: Manual for municipal solid

waste management

200 beds 0.250

Garden & open

space

15 kg/Acre/day or

0.0037 kg/sq m/day

Discussion with

Horticulturists

44584 sq m 0.16

E Waste 0.15 kg/cap/year Source: Manual for

municipal solid

waste management

6650 persons 0.0027

STP Sludge 100 kg per MLD Sewerage Design

Manual

244 KLD waste

water

0.025

Waste Oil Assuming one

maintenance per

year

Negligible

Total Waste Generated (MT/day) 1.82

5.Parking details are as follows:

Parking Norms

Residential

Hostel

Hospital

Commercial

Ambulance

1 ECS /80 sqm of permissible FAR





Parking Required - Residential = (4986.19*5)/80

Hostel = (2050.58*2)/80

Commercial = (13365.90*2)/30

Hospital = 10632.90/65

Ambulance = 10632.9/375

Total Parking Required

312 ECS

51 ECS

891 ECS

164 ECS

28 ECS

1446 ECS

Parking Provided

Basement = 25000/35

Surface = 18500/25

1454 ECS

714 ECS

740 ECS

6. The project proposal falls under category 8(a) of EIA Notification, 2006 (as

amended).

The committee discussed the matter and directed the project proponent to submit

following information:

1. Approved plan by Greater Noida Authority. 2. Copy of approved layout plan/maps/services plans.

3. Renewal of allotment letter as informed by the project proponent. 4. Area details showing proposed uses as residential, commercial, parks, parking, roads,

other services, facilities of the project also in percentage. 5. Letter/Permission for supply of water from Greater Noida Authority.

6. Proposal for rain water harvesting only from the rooftop. 7. Revised proposal for change in STP/ETP location as discussed should be submitted.

Minutes of 226th


of 44

8. Proposal for management/disposal of Bio Medical Waste alongwith radioactive

materials, if any. Disposal plan for hazardous waste should also be submitted.

9. Proposal regarding modular STP and guard pond.

10. Section of all internal roads should be provided. Right of way and carriage way width

should be clearly marked on the map.

11. 03 m peripheral green shall be provided around the project inside the project

boundary. According plans should be submitted.

12. The structure design certificate by qualified structure engineer should be submitted. The structural design certificate should preferably be vetted by IITs/CBRI. Provision

of alarm system, to timely notify the employees/residents, in case of occurrence of earthquake/other natural disasters/fire should be provided. NOC from Fire

Department should be submitted. 13. Provision of 100% solar lighting along the road side, stair cases, common places.

14. Facilities for attendants of patients. 15. Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary provision

amounting to 2% of project cost (Rs. 500 crore) shall be prepared and approved by Board of Directors of the company. A copy of resolution as above shall be submitted

to the authority alongwith list of beneficiaries with their mobile nos./address.


26. Group Housing Project at Plot No-GH-5 & 6, Sector-8B, Vrindavan Awas Yojna,

Lucknow, M/s Army Welfare Housing Organization, Col. C N Rawat, Project

Director, Chappan Chauraha, Lal Bahadur Shashtri Marg, Luckcnow Cantt. File

No. 2228/AD(H)


proponent for environmental clearance of Group Housing Project at Plot No-GH-5 & 6,

Sector-8B, Vrindavan Awas Yojna, Lucknow, M/s Army Welfare Housing Organization.

A presentation was made by Col. C.N. Rawat, project proponent alongwith their

consultant M/s Ascenso Enviro Private Limited. The proponent, through the documents

submitted and the presentation made, informed the committee that:-

1. The Environmental Clearance is sought for Group Housing Project at Plot No-GH-5

& 6, Sector-8B, Vrindavan Awas Yojna, Lucknow, M/s Army Welfare Housing

Organization.

2. Area details are as follows:

S. No. Particulars Area in Sq.m. In percentage (%)

1 Total Plot Area 16,943.590 …..

2 Permissible Ground Coverage 6,777.436 40% of plot area

3 Proposed Ground Coverage 4,070.9819 24.02% of plot area

4 Permissible FAR 25,415.385 150% of plot area

5 Purchasable FAR allowed @ of 1.0 of plot

area

16,943.590 100% of plot area

6 Total Permissible FAR 42,358.975 250% of plot area

7 Total Proposed FAR 37,998.815 224% of plot area

8 Permissible Convenient Shops Area 211.794875 0.49% of permissible FAR

Proposed Convenient Shops area 114.162 0.30% of proposed FAR

Residential area 36,827.954 96.91% of total proposed

FAR

Community area 1,012.456 2.66 % of total proposed

FAR

Guard rooms & meter room 44.244 0.11% of total proposed

FAR

Minutes of 226th


of 44

9 Total Non FAR area 15,149 ….

Basement area 12,617 83.28% of total Non-FAR

Stilts area 2,532 16.71% of total Non-FAR

10 Open Area ( plot area - achieved ground

coverage)

12,872.608 75.97% of plot area

11 Green area required @10% of plot area 1,694.359 10% of plot area

12 Green area proposed @ 28.17 % of plot

area

• Green area for lawn

• Green Belt

4,772.528

2322.96

2541.53

@ 13.17% of plot area

@ 15 % of Plot Area

13 Builtup Area (FAR+Non FAR) 53,147.82 ….

14 Height of the Tallest tower 43 meter ….


Name and Location of the Project Proposed Group housing project at Plot No-GH-5 & GH-6,

Sector 8B, Vrindavan Awas Yojna, Lucknow, U.P.

Developers of the project M/s. Army Welfare Housing Organisation

Total Plot Area 16,943.59 m

2

.

Built-up Area(Proposed FAR + Basement area

+ Services area) 53,147.82 m

2

.

Total Water Consumption 160 KLD

Total Freshwater Requirement 101 KLD

(Source: Municipal Supply)

Power Requirement 1685.7 KW

(Source: Uttar Pradesh Power Company Ltd.)

Power Backup 2 DG Sets of total capacity of 820 KVA

(1*500KVA, 1*320KVA)

Total Parking proposed 630 ECS

Solid Waste to be Generated 756 kg/day

No. of RWH Pits 2 RWH

4. Building blocks details are as follows: S. No. Type of building Storey

1 MDA(Tower F & G) 2 BHK

S+12

2 SFA(Tower D & E)

2 BHK

S+12

3 DXA (Tower A, B & C)

2 BHK+ Study

S+12

4. Club G+2

5. Convenient Shops G

5. Population details are as follows: S. No. Types No of unit / Area in sq.

m.

Person Per

Unit

Population

1 Residential Population 336 4.5 1512

2 Visitor 5 % of Residential

Population

---- ---- 76

3 Convenient Shops population 114.162 ---- 69

4 Staff @ 1.5 % of Residential

Population

---- ---- 23

Total Population 1680

6. Water requirement details of the project are as follows: S. No. Description Population /

Area in

sq. m.

Unit water

consumption

(LPD )

Total water

required

(KLD)

Water

requirement for

Domestic Use

(KLD)

Flushing

Water

(KLD)

A Residential

Population

1512 86 130.03 98.28 31.75

B Convenient

Shops population

69 45 3.10 2.07 1.03

C Visitor 76 15 1.14 0.68 0.45

D Staff 23 45 1.03 0.20 0.13

Minutes of 226th


of 44

E Landscaping

4772.528m

2

3 liter/sqm of

landscape

area

14.31 --- ---

F DG sets --- ---- 4.42 --- ---

G Fire Fighting

Tank

1% of total

Water

requirement

1.54

H Swimming Pool --- --- 5 KL

equivalent

per day

--- ---

Total 160.59

Say

160

101.24

Say

101

33.38

Say

33

7. Waste water details are as follows: S.No. Details Water (KLD)

1 Water requirement for domestic purpose 101

2 Wastewater to be generated from domestic use (@ 80% of domestic water

requirement)

81

3 Water requirement for Flushing Purpose 33

4 Wastewater to be generated from Flushing (@ 100% of flushing

requirement)

33

5 Total Wastewater generated 81+33

=114 KLD

8. Solid waste generation details are as follows: S. No. Category of Solid

Waste

Waste Generation Average Occupancy Waste generated

Residential Refuse 0.3 to 0.6 kg/cap/day 0.45 1680 756

Total waste generated 756 kg/day


amended).

The committee discussed the matter and directed the project proponent to submit

following information: 1. Approved maps/plans/layout plan from Lucknow Development Authority.

2. Copy of approved layout plan/maps/services plans. 3. No construction affidavit by the project proponent.

4. NOC from Fire Department and Airport Authority of India. 5. Provision for underground storage tank for collection of runoff.

6. Plan for municipal solid waste management. 7. Letter/Permission regarding Municipal Water Supply.

8. Written commitment from Lucknow Development Authority that the project is linked

with Central sewage system of Vrindavan Yojna as submitted by project proponent

for justification of no STP.

9. Proposal for rain water harvesting only from the rooftop. Plan for underground water

tank for storm water storage.

10. Setback details.


way.

12. 03 m peripheral green shall be provided around the project inside the project

boundary. According plans should be submitted. 13. Internal road width/carriage way/right of way alongwith design should be submitted.

14. Action plan regarding plantation of 500 trees as committed by project proponent.

15. Landscape plan.

16. Plan for convenient shopping and other facilities for residents.

17. Written request from project proponent regarding exemption of CSR with justification

as made by project proponent.


Minutes of 226th


of 44

27. Proposed Group Housing Project “Pushpanjali Seasons” at Mauza Jaganpur

Mustkil, Tehsil and Distt., Agra, U.P. M/s Pushpanjali Constructions Pvt. Ltd. U.P.

Sri Ganesh Chand Agrawal, File No. 2249/DD-Sh.


01/06/2015 wherein the project proponent was directed to submit following information:

1. Section of all internal roads should be provided. Right of way and carriage way

width should be clearly marked on the map.

2. Copy of receipt regarding the payment made to M/s Power Grid Corporation of

India Ltd. for shifting of HT line alongwith proposed schedule for this work

from M/s Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. Location of high tension line shifted as per letter from PCCIL photo copy is to be submitted.

3. Minimum 03 m peripheral green shall be provided around the project inside the

project boundary. According plans should be submitted.

4. Plan for use of LPG/CNG based DG sets alongwith commitment of its sources.

5. The structure design by qualified structure engineer should be submitted. The

structural design certificate should preferably be vetted by IITs/CBRI. Provision

of alarm system, to timely notify the employees/residents, in case of occurrence

of earthquake/other natural disasters/fire should be provided. A well defined

evacuation plan should also be prepared and submitted.

6. Submit the certificate issued by Irrigation Department regarding the site is not

under the flood area.

7. Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary

provision amounting to Rs. 2.0 crore shall be prepared and approved by Board

of Directors of the company. A copy of resolution as above shall be submitted to

the authority alongwith list of beneficiaries with their mobile nos./address.

The project proponent submitted their replies through letter dated 16/06/2015. A

presentation was made by Shri Mayank Agrawal, authorized representative of project

proponent alongwith their consultant M/s Paramarsh. The proponent, through the documents

submitted and the presentation made, informed the committee that:-

1. The environmental clearance is sought for Proposed Group Housing Project

“Pushpanjali Seasons” at Mauza Jaganpur Mustkil, Tehsil and Distt., Agra, U.P.

M/s Pushpanjali Constructions Pvt. Ltd.

2. Area details of the project is as follows:

Items Proposed Area (sq m) As per State Byelaws (sq m)

Total plot area 46100.0

Area under master plan 8760.0

Plot area 37340.0

Exclusive Green Area 3734.0 (10%)

Net plot area 33606.0

Ground Coverage 11978.64 (35.6%) 13459.15 (40%)

Compensatory FAR (50% of road widening) 4380.0

FAR 108976.43 (3.24) 116123.82

(3.45)

Basement Area (2 layers) 16024.18 (upper)

6388.28 (lower)

Machine & Mumpty Area 261

Total Built up area 131649.89

Open area 21627.36 (58%)

Landscape area (hard & soft) 13,734 (41%)

No. of Trees 350 nos. 338 nos. (1 tree/75 sq. mt. of

total open area)

Units 818 nos.

Minutes of 226th


of 44

Estimated Population Residential – 4090 (@ 5

person/unit)

Floating - 400

Staff – 50

Area utilization 08 Residential Towers

Maximum Height 42 m (S+13)

3. Block breakup details are as follows Residential Units Description

Residential Towers Block -A 254 Stilt + 12 Floors

Block -B 104 Stilt + 13 Floors

Block -C 104 Stilt + 13 Floors

Block -D 104 Stilt + 13 Floors

Block -E 104 Stilt + 13 Floors

Block -F 104 Stilt + 13 Floors

Block-G 44 Stilt + 11 Floors

Total 818 housing units

4. Water calculation details of the project is as follows:

Description Total

Occupancy

Rate of water demand

(lpcd)

Total

Fresh

Water

(KLD)

Total

Flushing/Recycled

water (KLD)

Total

Water

(KLD)

Residential 4090 Fresh Water @ 65 LPCD

Flushing Water @ 21

LPCD

265.8 86 352

Visitors (10%) 400 Fresh Water @ 5 LPCD

Flushing Water @ 10

LPCD

2 4 6

Staff 50 Fresh Water @ 30 LPCD

Flushing Water @ 15

LPCD

1.5 0.75 2.25

Landscape

development

13,734 sqm 1 l/sqm 13.5 13.5

Cooling water

for generator set

200 kVA 0.9 l/kVA/Hr 1.5 1.5

Total water 269.3

~269

105.75

~106

~375

5. Waste water details of the project is as follows: Water/ Waste water Details

Fresh water 269 KLD

Domestic Flushing water 91 KLD

Domestic wastewater 360 KLD

Horticulture / Landscape 13.5 KLD

Cooling water for generator set 1.5 KLD

Total water requirement 375 KLD

Waste water 288 KLD

STP Capacity 325 KLD (>15% extra for future expansion)

Water Source Municipal water supply

STP sludge 80 KG/D

• The net fresh water requirement for proposed project is 269 KLD. Wastewater reclaimed after treatment,

will be used for flushing, landscaping, cooling and road washing. 288 KLD will be the total waste water

generated, which will be treated in the STP of 325 KLD out of which, 106 KLD will be treated up to

tertiary treatment & recycled water for various uses including flushing, horticulture and power generator

set cooling and the spare i.e. 154 KLD will be treated up to secondary treatment before its disposal into

Municipal Sewers.

6. 08 nos of rain water harvesting pits are proposed for the project. 7. 1367 ECS proposed for the project.

Minutes of 226th


of 44

8. Solid waste generation details are as follows: Facilities Provided Waste generation norms per unit Unit Total Waste

Generated

(Kg/Day)

Residential 0.5 kg/cap/day

0.15 kg/c/day - visitors

4090 persons 2105

Garden & open space 0.0037 kg/sq m/day 13,734 51

Total Waste Generated (Kg/day) ≈ 2156 Kg/Day

STP Sludge 250 kg per MLD 325 KLD 80

E waste 1 Kg/day

9. Power and backup requirement details of the project are as follows: Power requirement 4500 kVA

Source of power and supply capacity Grid of UP Power Co. Ltd.

Backup power supply arrangement 2*100 kVA

Location of Generator sets At Substation

Stack Height 2.0 m + Highest Building Height

10. The project proposals are covered under category 8"a" of EIA Notification, 2006, as amended.

The committee discussed the matter and recommended grant of environmental

clearance on the project proposals alongwith general conditions as earlier prescribed by the authority for construction project and following specific conditions:

1. Construction shall be started only after getting prior approval of TTZ authority.

2. 03 m peripheral green shall be provided around the project inside the project boundary.

3. 15% area of the total plot area shall be compulsorily made available for the green belt development including the peripheral green belt.

4. Project falling with in 10 Km. area of Wild Life Sanctuary is to obtain a clearance from National Board Wild Life (NBWL) even if the eco- sensitive zone is not earmarked.

5. Criteria/ norms provided by competent Authority regarding the seismic zone be followed for construction work. Provision of alarm system, to timely notify the

residents, in case of occurrence of earthquake/other natural disasters/fire should be provided. A well defined evacuation plan should also be prepared and regular mock

drills should be arranged for the residents. Rise of stairs should be constructed in a way,

so that it should provide smooth movement.

6. For the treatment for total sewage, a full-fledged STP is to be provided with 20% more

capacity than waste water generated during operation phase.100% waste water is to be

treated in captive STP conforming to prescribed standards of receiving body for

designated use. Monitoring of STP to be done daily till its stabilization.

7. Dual plumbing should be adopted. Recycling of water as proposed shall be undertaken

with regular testing and monitoring of treated water.

8. Dedicated power supply for STPs is to be ensured during operation. Sludge of STP is to

be used in-house as manure and surplus manure should be managed by giving it to end

users. STP shall be suitably located nearest to back side boundary with shortest out let.

Operation and the maintenance cost of the STP shall also be informed along with the

compliance of the E-waste and municipal solid waste disposal. 9. Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary provision

amounting to 2% of total project cost shall be prepared and approved by Board of Directors of the company. A copy of resolution as above shall be submitted to the

authority. A list of beneficiaries with their mobile nos./address should be submitted alongwith six monthly compliance reports.

10. LEDs should be used in all common areas and corridors. 100% solar lighting is to be provided in the open areas/ stairs cases.

11. Parking guideline as per Agra Development Authority should be followed. Parking for

disabled persons should be explored.

Minutes of 226th


of 44

12. All entry/exit point should be bell mouth shaped.

13. To discharge excess treated waste water into public drainage system, permission from

the competent authority to be taken prior to any discharge.

14. 100 % provision of Rain Water Harvesting is to be made. RWH shall be initially done

only from the roof top. RWH from green and other open areas shall be done only after

permission from CGWB.

15. An underground Pucca tank for collection/reuse of rain water may be constructed.

16. Height of the stack should be provided based on combined LPG/CNG based DG sets capacity and be 6 m higher than the tallest building.

17. Post project monitoring for air, water (surface + ground), Stack noise of LPG/CNG based DG sets, STP to be carried out as CPCB Guidelines.

18. Crèche to be provided during the construction/operation phase. 19. Provision of separate room for senior citizen with proper amenities shall be made.

20. Protection shall be provided on the windows of the high rise flats for security of residents.

21. Unless and until all the environmental issues are sorted out the occupancy will be restricted and would be only allowed after achieving the Permission from the competent

authority.

22. The project proponent shall ensure that the project site does not attract/infringe any

buffer zone of no activity identified/declared under law.

23. For any extraction of ground water, prior permission from CGWB shall be taken.

24. Sprinkler to be used for curing and quenching and ready mix concrete may be used for

construction.

25. Possibilities of use of treated waste water for irrigation purposes should be explored.

Drip irrigation should be tried upto extent possible. No fresh water will be used for

irrigation purpose.

26. Mobile toilets, safe drinking water facility, sanitation facility and eco friendly fuels etc.

Shall be made available to the temporary residents/workers at the project site including the proper treatment and the disposal of the wastes.

28. Group Housing Project “Pushpanjali Heights” at Mau Rod, Agra, U.P. M/s Paawan

Sahakari Avas Samiti Ltd., Sri Ganesh Chandra Agrawal, 35/60, NOBASTA Loha

Mandi, Agra, U.P. File No. 2238/JDCA-S


13/12/2014 and in SEIAA meeting dated 12/01/2015 wherein the project proponent informed

that 80% construction work has already been undertaken. The SEIAA directed to take

necessary action as per MoEF OM dated 12/12/2012. In this continuation, Secretary, SEAC

sent a communication dated 03/03/2015 for issuing necessary direction to UPPCB for

initiation of credible legal action in the matter for violation of EP Act, 1986. State Govt.

through order dated 11/06/2015 directed Member Secretary, UPPCB for filing a legal case

for violation of EP Act against the project proponent. Necessary action in this regard is under

process. However, the committee noted that Hon'ble NGT in its order dated 07/07/2015 in the

matter of S.P. Muthuraman V/s Union of India and Ors. (Original Application No. 37 Of

2015 (M.A. No. 291, 293 & 294 Of 2015) and Original Application No. 213 Of 2014 (Ma

755 Of 2014 & M.A. No. 177 Of 2015) has quashed the MoEF OMs dated 12/12/2012 and

27/06/2013 related to provisions for dealing the violation matters. In this situation the matter

may be forwarded to SEIAA for taking necessary action in view of Hon'ble NGT decision

dated 07/07/2015.

Minutes of 226th


of 44

29. Expansion Of Group Housing Project “Paramount Emotions” at Plot No. GH-5 A,

Sector-1, Greater Noida, U.P. M/s Paramount Homeland Pvt. Ltd. File No.

2989/OSD(T)


proponent for environmental clearance of Expansion of Group Housing Project “Paramount

Emotions” at Plot No. GH-5 A, Sector-1, Greater Noida, U.P. M/s. Paramount Homeland Pvt.

Ltd.

A presentation was made by Shri Madan Bisht, representative of project proponent

alongwith their consultant M/s Grass Roots Research & Creation India (P) Ltd. The

proponent, through the documents submitted and the presentation made, informed the

committee that:-

1. The Environmental Clearance is sought for Expansion of Group Housing Project

“Paramount Emotions” at Plot No. GH-5 A, Sector-1, Greater Noida, U.P. M/s.

Paramount Homeland Pvt. Ltd.

2. M/s Paramount Homeland Pvt. Ltd. has been granted Environment Clearance for

Group Housing Project “Paramount Emotions” located at Plot No. GH-5A, Sector-

1, Greater Noida, District Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh vide reference no.

268/988/SEAC/2010/AD(H) dated 6th May,2013 for plot area 45,641 sq.m

(11.2781 acres) and built up area 1,79,136.24 sq.m.

3. The Project Proponent expand the project built up area from 1,79,136.24 sq.m. to

247496.957 sq. m.

4. Comparative area details of the project are as follows:

S.NO. DESCRIPTION VALUES IN

ACCORDED

EC

EXPANSION TOTAL

(EXISTING+

EXPANSION)

Percentage

wise area

1. Total Plot Area 45,641 (11.2781 acres) 100

2. Permissible ground coverage

(@ 35% of plot area

15974.35

3. Proposed ground coverage 10454.59 795.74 11250.33 24.65

4. Total Permissible FAR (a+b) 125512.75 34230.75 159743.5 350

a. Permissible FAR (@275% of plot area)

125512.75

b. Purchasable FAR --- 34230.75 34230.75

5. Permissible Additional FAR

(@15% of total permissible

FAR)

18826.91 5134.615 23961.525

6. Total proposed FAR 123774.019 35915.03 159689.046 349.8

7. Proposed Additional 15% FAR 12693.216 4596.586 17289.802 37.9

8. Total Basement 1 area (a+b) 40409.256 88.53

a. Basement area included

in 15% additional FAR

1127.38 --- 1127.38

b. Basement area excluding

15% additional FAR

39281.876 --- 39281.876

9.

Stilt/podium Area 7014.329 27849.101 34863.43 76.38

a. Stilt/podium area included in

FAR & 15% Additional FAR

3627.197

b. Stilt excluding FAR & 15%

additional FAR

3387.132 27849.101 31236.233

10. Open Area 35186.41 -795.74 34390.67 75.35

11. Landscape Area (@50% of

open space)

17300 37.67

12. Total Built up area

(6+7+8b+9b)

179136.24 68360.717 247496.957

5.Salient feature of the project are as follows:

Minutes of 226th


of 44

PROJECT FEATURES Values in accorded EC Total (EC Accorded + Expansion)

Estimated Population 8080 persons 10071 persons

Estimated Water

Requirement

Operation Phase

614KLD (Fresh water = 435

KLD) (Agency: Municipal

Supply)

820 KLD (Fresh water = 545 KLD) (Agency:

Municipal Supply)

Estimated wastewater

Generation

532 KLD 670 KLD

Power Demand 4900 KVA 6,450 KVA

Power Backup 3020 KVA (4 X 380 + 2 X 750)

capacity

4270 kVA (4 X 500 + 2 X 1010 + 250 kVA

each) capacity One of 1010 kVA and one of

500 kVA will be kept as stand by

Source of Power Noida Power Company Limited

(NPCL)

Noida Power Company Limited (NPCL)

Rain Water Harvesting Pits 20 Pits 20 Pits

Solid Waste Generation 3741.48 kg/day 4,621 kg/day

Parking Facilities

Required

Proposed

1592 ECS

1676 ECS

As per MoEF norms: 1645 ECS

As per Greater Noida Bye Laws: 1,997 ECS

2062 ECS (3.25 % more than proposed)

6.Comparison between earlier and proposed project:

DESCRIPTION EC ACCORDED EXPANSION TOTAL

PLOT AREA 45,641

BUILT UP AREA 179136.24 68,360.717 247496.957

LANDSCAPE AREA 17300

POPULATION 8080 1991 10071

TOTAL WATER REQUIREMENT 641 179 820

SOLID WASTE GENERATION 3741.48kg/day 879.52kg/day 4621kg/day

7. Areas wise land use details are as follows:

S.NO. DESCRIPTION AREA IN SQ.M. % wise area

1 Area under residential facility (GC) 10,053.33 22.03

2 Area under commercial (GC) 597 1.30

3 Area under community (GC) 600 1.31

4 Area Under Landscaping 17300 37.91

5 Area under road & remaining open area 17,090.67 37.45

TOTAL PLOT AREA 45641 100%

8. Comparative population details are as follows:

S.NO. Unit type EC accorded Expansion Total

(Existing+

Expansion)

1. Residential 6900 1209 8109

2. Service Personnel 490 158 648

3. Visitors 690 186 876

4. Maintenance staff - 438 438

Total Population 8080 1991 10071

5. Residential D.U. 1380 422 1802

Service personnel D.U. 218 70 288

TOTAL DU 1598 492 2090

9. Comparative water requirement details are as follows:

S. No. Description Area

(m2

) or

D.U

Total

Occupancy

Rate of

water

demand

(lpcd)

Total Water

Requirement

(KLD)

% in term

of total

water

requirement

A. Domestic Water

• Residents 1802 8109 86 697.374 85.04

• Service

personnel

288 648 86 55.728 6.79

• Visitors 876 15 13.14 1.60

• Maintenance

Staff

438 30 13.14 1.60

Total domestic water demand 779.382

B. Horticulture and 17300 1 17.3 2.10

Minutes of 226th


of 44

Landscape development l/sqm/day

C. *DG Sets (4*500 + 2*1010

KVA + 1*250 KVA)

0.9

l/KVA/hr

23.058 2.81

Grand Total (A+B+C) = 819.74KLD say 820 KLD

S.NO. Unit type EC accorded Expansion Total (Existing+ Expansion)

1. Total water required 641 179 820

2. Fresh water 435 110 545

3. Waste water generation 532 138 670

4. STP Capacity 650 260 910


amended).



Additional TORs :






6. Section details of all road.

7. All approved plans regarding proposed extension.

8. All revised services plans.

9. Status of construction with area chart.


other services, facilities of the project also in percentage. 11. Land use approved by the competent authority.

12. Complete Details of facilities to be developed by the project proponent i.e. for which environment clearance is sought.

13. Use of reflecting paints on roof top and side walls. 14. Details of rain water harvesting are to be given.

15. Provision of 100% solar lighting along the road site, stair cases, common places. 16. A site plan showing the project site and its surroundings with physical features and



information.


laws.




20. Revised structural plan is to be submitted signed by qualified structural designer for

revised proposals.



22. Examine in detail the proposed site with reference to impact on infrastructure covering water supply, storm water drainage, sewerage, power, etc., and the disposal

of treated/raw wastes from the complex on land/water body and into sewerage system. 23. Water requirement and water management plan alongwith necessary permissions for

discharge. The water consumption may be made more realistic based on reliable data. Similarly the waste water calculation should be based on factual facts supported by

the authentic data.

Minutes of 226th


of 44








27. Details of green belt as a measure for mitigation of dust and noise and buffer between habitation and proposed project.

28. Landscape plan, green belts and open spaces may be described separately. 29. Study the existing flora and fauna of the area and the impact of the project on them.

30. Examine existing crèche, education, health facilities, police, post Office, Banks and other services and make adequate provisions in the proposal.

31. Assess soil erosion in view of the soil characteristics, topography and rainfall pattern. 32. Application of renewable energy/alternate energy, such as solar and wind energy may

be described including solar water heating in the guidelines for entrepreneurs. 33. Consider solid wastes, including e-waste in addition to other solid wastes and their

disposal.








described.


39. Traffic management plan including parking and loading/unloading areas may be described. Traffic survey should be carried out both on weekdays and weekend.

40. Parking provision is to be made for higher ECS worked out either as per state bye-laws or construction manual of the MoEF. Comparative chart for previous proposals

and for proposed expansion. 41. Exclusive Parking area in the basement (excluding other facilities) and surface is to be

clearly mentioned 42. Provide service road for entry and exit to project site.

43. Use of local building materials should be described. 44. Consider provision of DG Flue Gas emissions to be treated in a scrubber. Stack







be prepared.




minimum 2% of the project cost as discussed in meeting shall be submitted on need base assessment study in the study area.

50. Details of all internal and peripheral roads width. 51. Source and quantity of required water during construction and management of

generated waste water. 52. Project falling with in 10 Km. area of Wild Life Sanctuary is to obtain a clearance

Minutes of 226th


of 44


earmarked.





the Office of Directorate, Member

General Guidelines:

a. A legal affidavit by the Project proponent on Rs. 100/- non-judicial Stamp Paper, duly attested by Public Notary, stating that:

I. “There is no litigation pending against the project and/or land in which the project is proposed to be set up (please give name & ownership etc. of the project) and that for


proponent.”









if any to the Project will be revoked at our risk and cost.” IV. Project does not fall under any buffer zone of no-development as declared /identified

under any law.




along with EIA.










mentioned. The consultant shall certify that his accreditation is for the sector for which this EIA is prepared.

f. On the front page of EIA/EMP reports, the name of the consultant/consultancy firm along with their complete details including their accreditation, if any shall be indicated.

g. While submitting the EIA/EMP reports, the name of the experts associated with/involved in the preparation of these reports and the Name of laboratory through

which the samples have been got analysed should be stated in the report. It shall clearly be indicated whether said laboratory is accredited by NABL or approved under the





monitoring etc.

Minutes of 226th


of 44




The project proponent also submitted that they had already done the monitoring for

premonsoon season i.e. from March-May, 2015 and requested to accept the monitoring data

to be used in EIA preparation. The committee discussed and deliberated that monitoring data

within validity period as per MoEF directions should be considered. The committee also

directed that since it is an expansion project, the project proponent should submit a

comparative statement on above issues also alongwith EIA report.

(Dr. M. S. Khan)

Chairman, SEAC,UP

(Dr. S.N. Singh)

Member, SEAC, UP

(S. C. Brahmachari)

Member, SEAC, UP

(Dr. D. C. Gupta)

Member, SEAC, UP

(Lalji Rai)

Secretary, SEAC, UP

Final minutes of 226 SEAC Meeting Dated 10-07-2015 › Uploads › MeetingMinutePdfs › ... · The...

Documents

Transcript of Final minutes of 226 SEAC Meeting Dated 10-07-2015 › Uploads › MeetingMinutePdfs › ... · The...