TERM REPORT

Entrepreneurship in International Business: An

Over view of SME’s Internationalization

SUBMITTED TO:

PROF. Dr Asim

Course Supervisor

SUBMITTED BY:

AMUN ARIF (03)

SABA SHAUKAT (44)

MARIJ ZAFAR (57)

SALMAN NASIR (49)

COURSE: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS

CLASS: BBA (8TH SEMESTER)

KARACHI UNIVERSITY BUSINESS SCHOOL

DATE OF SUBMISSION: 10TH DECEMBER 2015

TABLE OF CONTENT:

S.NO TOPICS PAGE NO.

1. Abstract……………………………………………………………………………3

2. Acknowledgement………………………………………………………………...4

3. Introduction……………………………………………………………………….5

4. Small And Medium Enterprises Of Pakistan……………………………………..8

5. The Research Domain Of International Entrepreneurship………………………10

6. Antecedents And Outcomes Of SME And New Venture……………………….11

7. Research Agenda………………………………………………………………...14

8. Overall Constraints………………………………………………………………18

9. The Challenges Of Internationalization In SME’s…………………………….....19

10. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………….…24

11. Recommendations…………………………………………………………….….25

12. References…………………………………………………………………….…30

Page | 2

Abstract:

This paper provides an introduction into the field of international entrepreneurship. A definition

of international entrepreneurship and associated key concepts is given and the research domain

of international entrepreneurship is described. A substantial part of the international

entrepreneurship literature concentrates on the internationalization of small and medium-sized

enterprises (SMEs) and new ventures. Based on an analysis of the existing literature the current

paper provides a framework for the study of antecedents and outcomes of SME and new venture

internationalization and presents a number of avenues for future research.

Page | 3

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We owe many thanks to a great many people who helped and supported us during

the completion of this project. My deepest thanks to our Course In charge,

Professor Dr. Asim, for giving us an opportunity to do such work and then for

guiding and correcting the various documents of the report with attention and care.

He has given his precious time to go through the project and make necessary

correction as and when needed.

Also, we would like to thank all those links and contacts who helped us gathering

up the data and making it an ease for us in completing this research project.

Page | 4

INTRODUCTION

This paper gives a preface to worldwide business and presents an investigation arrangement for

the examination of internationalization of little and medium-sized endeavors (SMEs) and new

interests. Worldwide venture as a field of investigation incorporates research into business

undertaking in various countries (crosscountry examinations of the nature and level of

entrepreneurial activity) and exploration into cross-periphery business (widespread development

of SMEs and new interests) (Lu and Beamish, 2001; Oviatt and McDougall, 2005). Business

undertaking or "the creation of new money related development" (Davidsson, Delmar and

Wiklund, 2006, p. 27) fuses new interest creation activity and new fiscal development of set up

firms. It is often expected that business endeavor, and cross-edge business particularly, adds to

regard or wealth creation both at the firm-level and at the wide level.

Undertaking, as measured by distinctive pointers, for instance, start-up development rates or the

addition in business proprietorship, expect a fundamental part in national economies (van Stel,

2006). Business venture is thought to be an imperative part for national money related headway

e.g. through its dedication to the time of employment and headway (Acs and Audretsch, 2003;

Autio, 1994;

Baumol, 2002; Carree and Thurik, 2003; Wennekers and Thurik, 1999; Schumpeter, 1934).

Nevertheless, critical complexities exist between countries in the extent to which business

undertaking is advancement or progression organized (Autio, 2007; Hessels, van Gelderen and

Thurik, 2008a), and accordingly in the extent to which venture contributes distinctly to national

money related change. In this way, it is essential for specialists, approach makers and agents, to

Page | 5

get understanding into the variables that impact the advancement of (distinctive sorts of) big

business and into the money related consequences of (diverse sorts of) business undertaking. To

fathom the centrality of business endeavor for national economies it is basic to consider cross-

periphery business undertaking or the commitment of SMEs and new interests in the worldwide

economy. Cross-edge works out, for instance, passages, are a crucial means through which little

and new interests can make quality, to create improvement and to get to new learning and

progressions abroad (Yeoh, 2004). Governments support cross-edge business undertaking and

particularly conveys with the hope to assemble national wealth and to upgrade all inclusive

forcefulness of the national economy (OECD, 1997).

Cross-periphery business undertaking has transformed into a more in all cases wonder in the

earlier decades. Usually, multinational endeavors (MNEs) were chiefly responsible for surges of

overall trade and outside direct theory (FDI), which are the prime primary impulses of

globalization. Then again, the late augmentation in overall trade and wander streams stems

generally from firms that used to focus fundamentally on private markets and not from firms that

starting now are overall players (Muller, 2004). One part of today's globalizing economy is that a

creating number of firms are endeavored overall activities and this joins broad firms, and

additionally (and logically) little and new interests (Moen and Servais, 2002; Oviatt and

McDougall, 1994; Rennie, 1993; Reynolds, 1997). Another segment of the current globalizing

economy is that associations, even little and new interests, are internationalizing at a speedier

pace (Oviatt and McDougall, 1999). Firms were by and large generally internationalizing

incrementally, starting with activities that incorporate low levels of threat and low levels of

obligation of benefits, for instance, circuitous charge (i.e. convey with the help of an

intermediating firm), before making a more impressive obligation in outside business parts e.g.

Page | 6

through conveying abroad (Johanson and Vahlne 1977, 1990). Nowadays the internationalization

of SMEs and new interests is both developing and enlivening, which is at risk to further add to a

more unmistakable number of money related performing craftsmen looking for after outside

business segments (Hessels, 2007b). The improvement and reviving of cross-edge venture

should be considered in the light of liberal changes that happened in the earlier decades and that

achieved a diminishment of trade costs for undertaking overall business. Firms are working in an

economy that is ending up being continuously around the world. The general diminishing of

trade and theory limits through the World Trade Organization and the establishment of regional

money related joint effort assentions, for instance, the European Union have diminished blocks

for SMEs and new sets out to end up all around element. Moreover, creative movements

(tallying the no matter how you look at it usage of web and email) and falling transportation

costs have achieved overhauled information streams between countries which empower little and

new interest internationalization (Autio, 2005; Reynolds, 1997). It has, for example, get the

opportunity to be less requesting for little and new sets out to find information about remote

markets and about clients abroad, to talk with outside accessories and to orchestrate distinctive

activities across over edges. An unyieldingly overall economy presents firms with both open

entryways and risks (Greenaway, Gullstrand and Kneller, 2008). Noteworthy open entryways

develop for little and new interests, for instance, to develop arrangements or business practices

abroad, to target specific all inclusive corners or to get to bleeding edge progressions abroad.

Perils may occur on account of extended outside contention (Acs, Dana and Jones, 2003), which

may give a more noticeable need to little and new firms to look past national edges to survive or

create (McDougall and Oviatt, 2000; Root, 1994).

Page | 7

The present paper concentrates on cross-edge business undertaking and exhibits a structure for

investigating forerunners and consequences of SME and new interest internationalization. Before

displaying the structure the accompanying fragments will first give a significance of worldwide

business and of related key thoughts and will demonstrate the examination space of overall

undertaking. The paper closes with different streets for future examination.

Small and Medium Enterprises of Pakistan

SMEs are expecting basic part in the money related progression of Pakistan (Syed et al., 2012).

As showed by the figures and truths gave by the UNIDO, 90 percent associations general fall

into the class of SMEs region and gives about 60 percent organizations around the world (Khan

et al., 2013). Little and medium tries (SMEs) accept a key part in adding to the economies and

are considered as the establishment of money related advancement in making and what's more

made nations. Like other making countries, Pakistan's economy is similarly, as it were,

considering SMEs (Khalique et al., 2011c).

Little and medium endeavors (SMEs) are significant to the economy of every country,

particularly making economies. SMEs are purposely key in various making countries,

particularly those arranged in the Asian region. SMEs are contributing basically in Pakistan's

economy since its opportunity (Hussain et al., 2012). Research on SMEs in Pakistani setting is at

starting stages. The wellbeing and execution of SMEs is at their exasperating stage.

Nonattendance of academic capital and base, political unsteadiness, and imperativeness crises

are the general and authentic threats to survival and quality of SMEs in Pakistan. In view of

nonattendance of capacities, SMEs are not prepared to battle at national and all inclusive level.

Page | 8

In this way, SMEs have wild troubles for their survival in centered environment (Khalique et al.,

2011c).

In Pakistan, more than 85 for every penny of the gathering associations can be assigned little and

medium attempts (SMEs). The remaining associations are branches of multinationals and their

branches. SMEs are feeling a steady need to stay mindful of the present level of development in

a rapidly changing mechanical environment, thusly making it central for them to perceive and

apply more pushed advances (Raouf, 1998).

As demonstrated by Bizomer (2009), in Pakistan, SMEs part is not only the minor sharer (having

little responsibility) till yet in boosting the economy, yet the truth is that Pakistan's whole

economy is extremely subject to the pace and proficiency of SMEs. Out of Pakistan's 3.2 million

endeavors, 95% are the people who have 99 specialists in private mechanical section and use

around 78% of non-green work power. SMEs contribute 25% admission of amassing stock and

30% of GDP is the consequence of business attempts of SMEs. SMEs will be the central

wellspring of dejection diminishment in Pakistan that will make the quality and advancement for

the country in the days to come.

According to Pakistan monetary study (2012-13), Pakistan's economy continues standing up to

challenges like imperativeness inadequacies, surges and rains, poor peace condition, and an

extensive gathering of other fundamental deterrents that have kept down endeavor and

improvement in the country. The economy of Pakistan in the midst of the latest five years built

up taking all things into account at the rate of 2.9 percent for every annum. Cutting edge portion

Page | 9

contains 20.9 percent of GDP having sub parts: delivering, improvement, mining and quarrying

and power and gas spread. Creating part has 13.2 percent offer in GDP. The advancement of the

collecting portion is evaluated at 3.5 percent appeared differently in relation to the improvement

of 2.1 percent a year prior.

In the country like Pakistan, the collecting division can progressing money related improvement

and competiveness. It is one of the fundamental parts in Pakistan. The territory has experienced

the changes during the time under assorted cash related conditions. To the extent all out national

yield (GDP), the offer of amassing part climbed in the latest 10 years from 14.7 percent in 1999-

2000 to 18.7 percent in 2010-11. On the other side, as showed by Shah (2011), theory, a

"supporter" of an economy, has shown a decreasing example from 2007 to 2011 (Memon and

Tahir, 2012).

THE RESEARCH DOMAIN OF INTERNATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP

Overall endeavor created as an alternate field of examination in the past two decades and began

with an eagerness for cross-edge business, particularly in internationalizing new interests

(McDougall, 1989), also consolidates SME internationalization (Lu and Beamish, 2001). Despite

cross-periphery business venture widespread business undertaking moreover joins the

examination of business endeavor in different countries (Coviello and Jones, 2004; Oviatt and

McDougall, 2005). Worldwide undertaking is an interdisciplinairy field that draws upon the

theoretical foundations of overall business and business venture. Overall business research,

which focuses upon the internationalization of the firm, used to be overpowered by investigation

on enormous multinational tries, however now moreover gives cautious thought to SME and new

Page | 10

interest internationalization. Endeavor research, which concentrates on little firms and business,

has tended to give cautious thought to cross-periphery works out (Acs and Yeung, 1999). The

field of all inclusive undertaking has been focused on from distinctive controls including

budgetary matters, mind science and humanism and business subdisciplines, for instance,

advancing, reserve and key organization (Oviatt and McDougall, 2005). Budgetary examination

that courses of action with big business focuses generally on the financial noteworthiness and

estimation of business endeavor and on clearing up the decision of individuals to start a new

business undertaking (Parker, 2004; van Stel, 2006; Wennekers, 2006). This kind of

investigation all around does not consider cross-periphery works out. Overall money related

research basically concentrates on analyzing the surge of stock, organizations and capital at the

full scale level besides pays thought on internationalization at the scaled down scale level

(business budgetary angles), generally with a consideration on multinational endeavors

(Brakman, Garretsen, van Marrewijk and van Witteloostuijn, 2006). Cross-periphery business

could be of energy to money related researchers roused by big business as an aftereffect of its

possibly basic quality making part within national economies and could be of specific

criticalness for all inclusive fiscal examination given the extended speculation of little and new

interests in the worldwide economy. Whatever is left of this paper focuses on the topic 'cross-

edge endeavor' or SME and new interest internationalization. A structure is shown for

scrutinizing forerunners and consequences of SME and new interest internationalization.

Considering this structure, the paper completions up with recommendations for future

examination.

ANTECEDENTS AND OUTCOMES OF SME AND NEW VENTURE

INTERNATIONALIZATION

Page | 11

Research into SME internationalization ascended in the 1970s and amplified astonishingly in the

past 35 years (Buckley, 1989; Coviello and McAuley, 1999; Fujita, 1995; Hollenstein, 2005;

Preston and Heller, 1997). Specific excitement for new interest internationalization began to

create in the late 1980s and was pushed by the discernment that a growing number of new

interests in particular countries around the world saw their working region to be worldwide at or

close starting point (McDougall, 1989). There are a couple of clarifications behind why SME and

new interest internationalization merit specific examination thought, autonomously from

sweeping firm internationalization. Case in point, SMEs and new interests are typically more

resource constrained than greater firms e.g. to the extent cash related and human capital

resources, and along these lines internationalization is seen to be more troublesome for such sorts

of firms (Coviello and McAuley, 1999). Furthermore, SMEs and new interests will likely

experience the evil impacts of liabilities of freshness (inferring that young or new firms face

particular difficulties and have a more genuine risk of dissatisfaction) and liabilities of

foreignness (suggesting that associations normally have a downside in appreciation to close-by

firms when working in outside business divisions) when stood out from greater firms. Another

premise for looking at internationalization of little and new firms freely from sweeping firm

internationalization relates to the key some portion of the proprietor/administrator in SME and

new interest internationalization (Coviello and McAuley, 1999; Miesenbock, 1988). Such

differences amidst enormous and more diminutive firms suggest that SME and new interest

internationalization is not easily cleared up by standard internationalization theories that were

delivered generally to elucidate internationalization among tremendous firms (McDougall,

Covin, Robinson and Herron, 1994). In like manner, in a world in which firms are

internationalizing earlier and at a faster pace, the congruity of the stage theory (Johanson and

Page | 12

Vahlne, 1977, 1990), which sets that internationalization is a consistent methodology that

happens after firms have developed themselves in the family unit business area and which has

been to a great degree convincing in illuminating internationalization of little firms, is

diminishing.

Existing examination on cross-edge business is centered around investigating forerunners of

internationalization at the little scale level and gives cautious thought to aftereffects of

internationalization. Antecedents of cross-periphery business join both empowering and curbing

powers and can be separated into three general subcategories: individual-/businessman specific

components, firm-specific variables and environment-specific parts (Antoncic and Hisrich, 2000;

Ford and Leonidou, 1991; Ibeh, 2006). Solitary specific components essentially relate to

properties of the business visionary. Tests of components that have been found to totally impact

internationalization are demographic segments, for instance, age (Westhead, 1995) and the level

of preparing (Simpson and Kujawa, 1974), and variables relating to particular's learning and

experience, for instance, the business visionaries' or top organizations' general business

experience and data of outside establishments, (for instance, learning of remote laws, principles,

standards and tongues) (Bloodgood, Sapienza and Almeida, 1996; Eriksson, Johanson, Majkgard

and Sharma, 1997; Oviatt and McDougall, 1995; Reuber and Fischer, 1997). Instances of firm-

specific variables that have been found to strongly impact internationalization are crucial firm

qualities, for instance, firm size similarly as business and arrangements (Chetty and Hamilton,

1993; Lefebvre and Lefebvre, 2002; Westhead, 1995) and an organization's benefit base, for

instance, the responsibility for unique thing (Akoorie and Enderwick, 1992; Cavusgil and Nevin,

1981), the responsibility for prohibitive development and the responsibility for organization

capacities (Autio, Sapienza and Almeida, 2000; Cavusgil and Nevin, 1981; Keeble, Lawson,

Page | 13

Smith, Moore and Wilkinson, 1998; Roberts and Senturia, 1996). Environment-specific variables

that may influence internationalization consolidate both nearby business part and outside

financial circumstances. A couple of representations of environment-specific components that

have been found to relate determinedly to internationalization are a fall in progress costs in the

home business part (Axinn, 1988) and the minimal size of the home business segment

(Rasmussan, Madsen and Evangelista, 2001). Composing on trailblazers of SME

internationalization is wide and it would be excessively clearing, making it impossible to give a

complete outline here. Different inventors have tried to give a graph of key revelations of the

exploratory written work on precursors of SME internationalization (See for event Aaby and

Slater, 1989; Bilkey, 1978; Fletcher, 2001). It is basic to observe that past examination delivered

couple of enduring disclosures, which may relate to the way that studies have used differing

operationalization's for internationalization (e.g. convey probability, exchange compel), and did

not by and large offer a crosscountry perspective. The exploratory examination base on

components that drive the early internationalization of new interests and imagined globals is still

obliged and, all things considered, in perspective of relevant investigations including one, or at

most a few, countries (See Johnson (2004) for a study of key composition on drivers of right on

time internationalization). The confined precise investigation base on antecedents of new interest

internationalization, and the route that past examination on harbingers of SME

internationalization made couple of solid disclosures forsake it murky whether, and to what

degree, the determinants for new interest internationalization contrast from those of SME

internationalization. Composing on aftereffects of SME and new interest internationalization is

significantly more compelled than composing on forerunners (Lu and Beamish, 2006; Zahra,

2005). Cross-edge business venture may deliver results at the individual-level (e.g. concerning

Page | 14

capital and social capital progression) at the firm-level (e.g. to the extent formal, business

improvement and progression) and at the vast scale level (e.g. to the extent work improvement,

headway and money related advancement). Regardless of the way that the potential worth

making a portion of internationalization is regularly highlighted, it is also possible that

internationalization prompts (between time) negative results.

RESEARCH AGENDA

In light of the framework gave above and on the present investigation base on SME and new

interest internationalization, the rhythmic movement portion shows different roads for future

examination. As noted in advance, particularly observational investigation on result effects of the

distinctive routines for internationalization in which SMEs and new interests are incorporated is

still confined, both at the scaled down scale (individual-and firm-) and expansive scale level.

Couple of observational studies have focused on looking into money related responsibilities of

little and new firms similarly as firm-level improvement and benefit (Bloodgood, Sapienza and

Almeida, 1996; McDougall and Oviatt, 1996; Zahra, Ireland and Hitt, 2000). Focuses on full

scale fiscal results, for instance, monetary advancement, are a great deal more limited (Hessels

and van Stel, 2007). As an aftereffect of this weak test foundation more research is required on

the quick and also indirect effects of little and new interests' worldwide operations on budgetary

execution (Zahra, Ireland and Hitt, 2000), including full scale level results (e.g. as to and

occupation advancement). In addition future investigation could hope to give all the more

understanding into the hugeness of the distinctive instruments (e.g. the supply of grouped

qualities, the period of positive data floods, and the acceleration of contention) through which the

widespread activities of SMEs and new interests may add to full scale money related

progression. Exactly when investigating potential result effects of internationalization one should

Page | 15

recall that such result effects may similarly be forerunners of internationalization. Case in point,

imagination can both be an outcome sway and an ancestor of internationalization (Hessels,

2007a). More especially, having an innovative thing or organization may fabricate potential

results for firms to battle in outside business parts, while through internationalization firms may

in like manner get some answers concerning better methodologies for doing things, which may

add to an affiliation's inventiveness. Future investigation should be careful to such potential two-

sided linkages while scrutinizing harbingers and aftereffects of internationalization for charges

and in addition for diverse systems for internationalization, for instance, outside direct

hypotheses and general joint effort. Possible pointers that could both be harbingers and

aftereffects of internationalization are, for occasion, effectiveness and livelihood improvement.

The academic written work spotlights on firm or coordinator level elucidations for SME and new

interest worldwide activity and has generally overlooked the piece of establishments (Yeung,

2002; Zahra, 2005). The association and nature of foundations may impact firm-level

internationalization (Hessels, van Gelderen and Thurik, 2008b; Terjesen and Hessels, 2009).

Establishments can be portrayed as "a game plan of standards, formal or easygoing, that

performing specialists generally take after, whether for controlling, mental or material reasons"

(North 1990, p. 3). Associations, for instance, work market, educational or capital business

segment arrangements, may both engage or oblige money related behavior (North 1990) and

budgetary trades (Williamson, 1998). Establishments may in like manner effect part of business

venture across over profitable and pointless activities (Baumol, 1990). Right when inspecting the

relationship between 14 associations and firm-level internationalization one should think about

the probability that interrelationships may exist among diverse institutional structures and that

business visionaries and their tries can similarly shape the institutional environment. Late

Page | 16

revelations prescribe that other internationalizing administrators can enhance the likelihood for

SMEs and new sets out to internationalize through the period of admission floods (Aitken,

Hanson and Harrison, 1997; Greenaway, Sousa and Wakelin, 2004; Kneller and Pisu, 2007; De

Clercq, Hessels and van Stel, 2008; Hessels and Terjesen, 2009). Regardless, learning is absent

into the exact channels through which such floods happen (e.g. through business linkages and

through prior occupation with outside firms). Littler scale level investigation could choose the

cautious flood channels and to give understanding into the centrality of the distinctive occupies

in engaging SME and new interest internationalization.

For the most part, composing on firm-level illuminations tends to stretch the importance of an

organization's benefit base and high ground for SME and new interest internationalization. In

any case, firms, including resource obliged little and new interests, moreover collect high ground

through worldwide activities. Additional comprehension is required into whether and how SMEs

and new interests make regard and can get to resources (e.g. human capital, data and new

advances) through general activities. Despite inspecting the piece of an organization's benefit

base in driving internationalization, it could in like manner be invaluable to look into the piece of

saw constraints and resource weaknesses in embellishment firm-level internationalization

conduct (Hessels, 2008). Case in point, internationalization as an approach to get to skilled work

may be particularly essential for firms that are adjusting to an absence of capable work in the

home business division.

Moreover, as noted heretofore the back and forth movement examination base on SME and new

interest internationalization concentrates basically on passage activity. Convey activity is thought

Page | 17

to be the first and most ordinary step in an affiliation's all inclusive augmentation (Young, 1987;

Young, Hood and Dunlop, 1988). Passage does not require critical capital theories (Erramilli and

D'Souza, 1993; Root, 1994) and the business and cash related risks are lower appeared

differently in relation to, for occurrence, remote direct wander (Jaffe and Pasternak, 1994). Of

course, SMEs are moreover incorporated into other general activities, for instance, imports and

worldwide joint effort understandings. Understanding of the systems of internationalization at

the firm-level is still compelled, e.g. with what activities do firms start their internationalization

and how does the method advance. Exactly when firms are incorporated into more than one

strategy for internationalization it is valuable to get understanding into how the distinctive modes

are associated, e.g. does one development lead to the following, to what degree are the

distinctive worldwide activities relating etcetera.

Finally, future worldwide business venture examination could advantage exceptionally from

including a perspective on cross-edge activities to investigate on big business in different

countries and from adding an alternate country perspective to ask about on cross-periphery

business. Counting a perspective cross-edge activities to look at on big business in different

countries will grow our cognizance of the monetary favorable circumstances and drivers of

business transversely over countries. Including a various country perspective to ask about on

cross-edge business will fabricate the ability to whole up revelations.

Overcoming Resource-Constraints through Internationalization?

Past investigation has demonstrated that associations can use internationalization as a framework

to get to and create resources. Such a framework may be especially convincing or even key (for

Page | 18

occasion to survive or create) for firms that need specific resources. In light of advantage

dependence theory this part looks at whether resource deficiencies to the extent work, cash and

advancement enhance the likelihood for little and medium-sized attempts (SMEs) to plan to get

to or store up these specific resources through internationalization. Different speculations are

took a stab at using firm-level data from the ENSR Enterprise Survey 2003 for 7,673 SMEs

arranged in 18 European countries. The results demonstrate that obvious resource goals to the

extent work and reserve urge SMEs to grasp all inclusive activities with the expect to get to or

hoard work, independently back. It is in like manner found that among all around element SMEs

considered objectives to be far as work, asset and new development extend the probability of

SMEs to use their worldwide activities as a techniques for getting to or acquiring these

uncommon resources.

The Uppsala model in its ease has ended up being an observationally discernible

internationalization model. Sensible decision making or organized key action is not reality of

SMEs (Huber, 2008). Instead of the bewildering strategy and orchestrating speculations of

commendable all inclusive organization theory, the Uppsala model elucidates

internationalization as an incremental technique of recursive learning and moderate create of

business part data and frameworks. Medium-sized and smaller associations develop to

neighboring countries topographically or socially, paying little respect to which enveloping

target markets are intriguing purposely and monetarily (Wolf, 2011).The run of the mill case of

internationalization in medium-sized and tinier associations is the use of business opportunities

and existing contacts. Beginning from this, most firms bit by bit proceed from the "known" to the

"dark" (Blunck and Martin, 2011). This relates with the revelations of affiliation hypotheses.

Page | 19

Affiliations step by step get experience and thusly shape them further into a productive

procedure in light of progressive learning. Internationalization is a learning method depicted by a

chain of offhand creation, trial, and bungle and unequivocally depends on upon the exercises of

key laborers (Simon, 2007). Medium-sized and humbler firms use less perilous, more diminutive

scale and less powerful business area section frameworks particularly for cost reasons.

Additionally, they don't practice the ordinary choices of internationalization models and

speculation, for instance, allowing, franchising and essential unions, joint attempts or mergers

and acquisitions (Hollenstein, 2005; Wolf, 2011). Around the beginning, the middle is frequently

put on charge, which is by and large as a result of customer enthusiasm from abroad (drive part)

or supplier contacts. On this reason, an ordinary medium-examined business sets a business

reinforcement abroad, with relentless arrangements and the achievement of a specific level of

offers volume. By then it broadens, dependent upon arrangements volume, transportation and

pay costs, and sets up an enduring establishment with a division for creative work and/or an era

office (Kutschker and Schmid, 2008; Müller-Stewens and Lechner, 2005; Wolf, 2011.

The challenges of internationalization in a small firm

Working in X Company as far back as two years, a couple of challenges X Company faces were

seen in the midst of their business works out. These fuse challenges stood up to in both family

unit and remote markets. The best test X Company has faced is that their things are for the most

part created by distinctive associations, while X Company simply has the rights to pass on them

within Turkey. Hopeless condition happen over who gets the chance to offer the thing to remote

associations, as frameworks made by X Company has been accepted control by the principal

association that offers those things to X Company. This occasion was seen on various occasions

where the customer was fascinated with the organization it got from X Company and business

Page | 20

relationship amidst, however changed to the essential association due to lower expenses offered

by that association. Mr. X has said that, X Company was trading routinely with a firm in

Uzbekistan. The contact between the two associations was extraordinary, and the area firm was

content with X Company's organization. However the association that had and sold the stock to

X Company (Y Company) interceded after a period communicating that they had prohibitive

offering rights to that country. X Company knew from past dialogs with Y Company that they

didn't have such a benefit some time as of late. Exactly when Y Company made sense of that it

was achievable offering in Uzbekistan, they accepted control over the trade and gave the contact

in Uzbekistan the world class offering rights in 2011. However taking after three years, before

the end of 2013, the close-by firm got in contact with X Company toward the day's end while

communicating that they were bothered with Y Company and expected to buy the things from X

Company. Pedersen (2000) state that the outside forcefulness of the general markets influences

the headway of the internationalization of firms. While competition can happen through firms

that are regular contenders (rivals) in a business division, they may similarly begin from within

an affiliation's own specific framework. Johanson and Vahlne (2009) note that associations

frequently have close and continuing business relations with their suppliers and customers. They

incorporate this web of relationship between unmistakable firms and their own specific

frameworks makes the web of affiliations that the inventors have named business frameworks.

The inventors fight that "insidership" is gotten when a firm is all that much arranged within a

framework and has collected trust in the framework and has placed assets into the framework

with their commitment. As trust and obligation is a principal bit of general business empowering

and being an insider in a framework, any exercises within the framework that harms the trust of a

firm will hurt the business activities of the associations related in that business affiliation.

Page | 21

Starting now X Company is setting out on a way where it will make its own specific stock

remembering the finished objective to market and offer the choosing thing on remote markets.

This framework will allow X Company to find and utilize new frameworks for their

internationalization. Another test X Company faces is the money related hardships in the

neighborhood business division. With the association's guideline wellspring of pay depleting in

light of growing contention, its advantages reducing in light of extending overhead costs and

declining edges between the cost of the stock and the expenses of the items; the money related

condition of the association does not consider gigantic hypotheses at the given time. In like

manner considering that the pay of the association is getting less fluid with the due date of pay

escapes each year, the association ought to be exceedingly direct of how it spends its money.

Joined with the fiscal and politic unsettling impacts in the neighborhood advertise, this qualities

X Company to be incredibly risk opposed. It is noted by Gankema et al. (2000) that stagnation

may happen for little firms because of money related reasons in their nearby markets. They

observe that this stagnation can put off the change of the organization's status in the overall

business part. It is key to observe that long and tough times of stagnation within the private

business segment for firms with strong family unit markets and for the most part high overhead

costs could incite firms being not capable internationalize totally as Clerq et al. (2005) saw that

growing private learning focus is oppositely related to internationalization accomplishment.

Gallup Organization (2007) has found that nonappearance of capital is the second most

prominent basic in the wake of lacking business division data for SMEs to their conveying

activities. It was similarly the most astonishing reported prerequisite by the Turkish firms as

showed by the same study. X Company is a grade structure, where the delegates can hone their

judgment on tinier business decisions. Going to the general executive of the association is

Page | 22

straightforward, and he can be directed on matters where the agents would incline toward not to

accept obligation. While this makes a decent work environment for the delegates, it has a

downside on the internationalization process. The internationalization method requires the

organization's high thought. There are frameworks to guide out, spending arrangements to make

and review destinations to pick, publicizing exercises to be picked, sorting out activities to be

made, desired remote markets to be picked, data on specific outside business parts to be gotten,

general learning on dealing with the worldwide markets to be obtained. These require

sponsoring, and additionally require the thought of the organization of the firm. On the other

hand, the organization commitment in growing the worldwide exchanging of the firm and

finding new markets has been low in light of the challenges of the step by step business life in

the nearby business segment. Clerq et al. (2005) states that top organization's entrepreneurial

activities hold a crucial position in the internationalization strategy of a firm by managing the

degree of the firm to a more overall position. Gankema et al. (2000) states that the experience of

organization is completely related to the accomplishment of the internationalization progression

of a firm. Reuber and Fischer (1997) saw that the experience of the organization for progressing

on the periods of internationalization for SMEs that work within a generous family unit business

area is significantly more key appeared differently in relation to the next little firms. Given that

X Company is in an industry with a gigantic private business part, the organization experience

and commitment in the internationalization system is an irrefutable prerequisite. Given that the

affiliation is on lower levels, this presents itself as a test for overall improvement. Watching X

Company's systems for the outside business part, two sorts of entry procedures give off an

impression of being getting hold. They are either conveying the finished items through a pros, or

turnkey wanders through contractual work in which the conveyed stock's foundation will be

Page | 23

grasped by either X Company agents or through outsourcing in the midst of which X Company

delegates will be administering the foundation. It should be seen that, all the turnkey wanders X

Company has been able to was a synergistic work with a framework association. X Company has

picked low psychic division countries to admission to. It has picked distorted exchanging

through an administrators for straightforwardness of transportation and for taking after

conventions regulations without successfully getting involved with the outside market's

standards and regulations. Subsequently the pros takes control over the transportation,

publicizing and customs endeavors for the conveying, while X Company focuses on obtaining

and setting up the stock for exchanging. X Company is starting late undertaking worldwide

endeavors in countries with greater psychic detachment utilizing relationship with frameworks

organization associations. Using the experience of associations within its framework, X

Company can increment essential business segment information on distant business parts. This

not simply looks into the data obstacle to decrease, also allows X Company to find new

frameworks in the inside business segment. In the dynamic internationalization framework for

stage speculation of Gankema et al. (2000), X association's framework for business in the

widespread markets may be considered as dynamic consideration. X Company has a

charge/arrangements extent of around 10% and is starting now coordinating with its framework

associations to find and abuse new open entryways in the all inclusive markets. It has a tenacious

charge rate through its experts in low psychic division countries. The reasoning behind

conveying through an administrators, which is called underhanded exchanging, as showed by

Albertini et al. (2011) is that roaming conveying is the scarcest risky methodology for

internationalization. Johannson et al. (2008) states that with underhanded conveying the firm has

lesser control over the showcasing technique and Osland et al. (2001) centers out that the

Page | 24

endeavor of center individuals in the midst of unusual conveying is the vehicle and the

showcasing of the things. Albertini et al. (2011) incorporates customs flexibility as an errand for

the administrators in underhanded conveying. Using frameworks to overcome limits of data and

psychic division has been communicated in the framework theory by Johanson and Vahlne

(2009). They have proposed in their reconsidered adjustment of Uppsala model in 2009 that

every business segment is an arrangement of associations where firms are joined with each other

and that through these affiliations firms can get new data, build trust and grow their devotion,

which are the key determinants put forth by Johanson and Vahlne (2009) for a productive

internationalization.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, it can be communicated that immaculate basic courses of action and models are

made for an impeccable regular firm with no repressions to the extent size, industry or other firm

qualities. In this way, it is not astonishing that reasons of criticism to the straight deterministic

point of view are highlighted in the composition. Internationalization models and hypotheses

take after a semi obvious gathering of stages that don't exist in reality; additionally, regardless of

the way that they are seen as exhibited in the written work, it is hard to call every one of them

comprehensive and especially material to SMEs (Chetty and Campbell, 2003; Wolff and Pett,

2000). Considering a written work review the going with conclusions are drawn: worldwide

undertaking can be seen as an investigation region at the union of two fields, specifically

business and overall business, with a detectable admixture of essential organization (saw as key

business), general business can be similarly seen as one of the strands in firmlevel

internationalization (taking the whole gainfulness of monetary matters and organization)

illuminating this method from the perspective of the representative and the entrepreneurial

Page | 25

methodology, overall business endeavor has transformed into a basic examination space,

which is getting in sum (the amount of disseminated articles and furthermore the amount of

journals circulated unprecedented issues on IEs) and quality (of the level of the conveyed

articles), worldwide venture focuses on the business visionary furthermore on headway and

entrepreneurial techniques concerning affirmation and misuse of worldwide open entryways. It

creates the impression that making a solid and fascinating procedure of all inclusive endeavor

(Coviello and Jones, 2004) is essential to see overall business as an alternate investigation

discipline, in like manner as by virtue of worldwide business. Considering the interdisciplinary

character of business undertaking, it is possible that overall business will totally transform into

'an inside point and a spoke' (Mtigwe, 2006, p. 19) and a folio for all internationalization

hypotheses and philosophies constituting the base for integrative model.

Recommendations

The watched quality of by far most of the already perceived top limits to SME

internationalization challenges technique makers to fortify persistent attempts at removing these

steadfast deterrents, especially obstacles in asset and related resources, worldwide contacts, and

huge regulatory data. The disclosures in like manner highlight the procedure with essentialness

of fitting mediations to shore up the cash related resource foundations of SMEs (European

Commission, 2007). Support acquisition, putting everything in order, should focus on starting the

internal motivations of the SMEs themselves, including their strong mission for advancement,

advantage, bit of the pie, and worldwide region, for it is these sorts of SMEs who will likely be

awakened to achieve their all inclusive improvement desires. This gives continuing with guard to

the division or needs-based approach to manage concentrating on internationalization support

(Ibeh, 2006; Leonidou et al., 2007; Wheeler et al., 2008).

Page | 26

The evidence fortifies the criticalness for head of open portion internationalization reinforce

tasks to have a sensible perception of their target customer gathering (Leonidou et al., 2007). In

addition, it is pretty much as basic to pass on best practice reinforce acquirement, having due

appreciation to the germane worldwide trains and standards, very those of the European

Commission and the World Trade Organization. Reconsidering the wheel must be restricted for

suitable benchmarking of the

help tasks of other for all intents and purposes indistinguishable economies and sensible

modification and change as per any paramount circumstances that are exceptional to the target

SME bunch.

The proceeding with low customer level perspective of the sufficiency of open fragment support

programs (Ibeh, 2006; Wheeler, Ibeh, and Dimitratos, 2008) raise different issues, including the

extent to which the specific reinforce ventures have customer data at the diverse pre-release

composes, the level of consideration regarding these undertakings among the target customer

gatherings and distinctive accomplices, and the way of utilization and movement of the tasks.

The essential point about the level of customer information highlights the prerequisite for

organizers of vital reinforce activities to demonstrate the presentation of specific undertakings

after the new thing headway process framework, which commonly requires unmistakable yet

iterative levels of thought period and multi-stage screening and appraisals including the target

customer and other key accomplices before the far from inevitable full release and

commercialisation. Such a fine-grained strategy may not ensure the accomplishment and

Page | 27

complete acknowledgment for the thusly displayed reinforce programs, however would improve

their clear quality and congruity to the goal customers. It would in like manner demonstrate the

devotion of the huge workplaces to getting support acquisition right.

The proficient undertaking headway system envisioned above necessities not be unduly

unreasonable. Unmistakably, it can energize general cost reasonability through its potential

responsibility to tending to the imperfect level of consideration regarding available reinforce

program among the target customers and other key accomplices and the partner quality with

utilization of these undertakings. The conflict is that placing direct in incorporating and relating

with the target customers and key accomplices in the midst of the design of the reinforce

measures is inclined to have positive flood effects in regards to care that may be made through

customer gathering correspondence. Such initial obligation of time and effort is likely

furthermore to provoke more huge understanding and better movement of the support measures

on a part of the pertinent workplaces.

Concerns, for instance, the above in all likelihood clear up why the created private part drove

model of giving SME internationalization support has gotten trade out somewhat number of the

investigated economies, strikingly Finland and Russia. The Finnish association with Finpro

teamed up by the Ministry of Trade and Industry is a settled instance of compelling open private

zone association in internationalization reinforce obtainment. Distinctive economies may wish to

think about the workings of this association with a point of view to altering it for their own

specific purposes.

Page | 28

Some additional comments as for the care and detectable quality of internationalization support

tasks are respected principal. This is a direct result of the relative inconvenience experienced in

this present study in getting pertinent data on the reinforce tasks offered by a bit of the focal

economies. The way that all that much experienced masters experienced difficulties in getting to

such information suggests that most agents are extraordinarily at risk to fight, which may

elucidate the as often as possible heard instance of nonappearance of care. Internationalization

support associations may wish to overview their web region and accessibility and to benchmark

their acquisition against open best practice. Incredible examples worth duplicating fuse those of

the vital workplaces in Australia, Canada, Finland, New Zealand, UK and South Africa, amongst

others.

A possibly supportive „must-have‟ in these destinations are basic and element associations with

the reinforce programs for SME internationalization gave by supra-national relationship, for

instance, the European Commission, the Union Nations, and the World Bank. A great deal of

sponsorship is energetically open and possibly accessible to SMEs and it is vital that suitable

information is set within their degree and passed on to their thought. On a possibly more broad

note, it is crucial to get whatever number SMEs as could sensibly be relied upon to end up tied

up with the thought about the Internet as a to a great degree rich and fiscally canny resource for

impact to build the estimation of their business, particularly in regards to boosting their

understanding base on internationalization and overall markets.

All things considered, approach makers need to address the going with request, among others:

Page | 29

• Do we have the fitting reinforce measures to address the specific game plan of top deterrents

recognized? Given this is genuine, are the goal SMEs enough aware of them?

• How well does our support acquirement complexity and worldwide best practice?

• How responsive is this support acquirement to any watched sub-national or sectoral parts of the

obvious hindrances? Are support programs suitably evident online?

• What do we know concerning target users‟ perspective of our reinforce acquisition? Shouldn't

something be said in regards to nonusers‟ acknowledgments?

• What exercises are relied upon to upgrade care and saw support of our reinforce programs for

SME internationalization?

The above request require a fittingly made undertaking out of trial investigation. In particular,

basic quality could be incorporated by assessing the perspective of government

internationalization support programs among SMEs from picked countries and areas. The

technique for thinking for this sort of examination, based upon a concentrate starting late

endeavored by the UKTI, would be to set up how existing government acquirement is seen by

the proposed beneficiaries. The SME study would search for occurrence to approach SMEs for

Page | 30

what justifiable reason they don't use what is on offer, how they might need to reconsider ebb

and flow ventures and what new undertakings they might need to see made. The proposed

investigation would incorporate far reaching scale survey audits of SMEs in around ten

countries, to be supplemented by somewhat number of through and through relevant

examinations drawn from the sharing countries. The decision of these logical examination

subjects will be instructed, notwithstanding different things, by a need to get bits of information

from SMEs from particular locals and divisions.

Page | 31

REFERENCES

1. Aaby, N.-E. and Slater, F.S. 1989. Managerial Influence on Export Performance: A Review of the

Empirical Literature 1978-1988, International Marketing Review, 6(4), 7-26.

2. Acs, Z.J. and Audretsch, D.B. 2003. Innovation and Technological Change, in: Z.J. Acs and D.B.

Audretsch (Eds), Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research. An Interdisciplinary Survey and

Introduction, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 55-80.

3. Acs, Z.J., Dana, L.-P. and Jones, M.V. 2003. Toward New Horizons: The Internationalisation of

Entrepreneurship, Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 5-12.

4. Acs, Z.J. and Yeung, B. (Eds). 1999. Small and Medium Sized Firms in the Global Economy,

The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

5. Aitken, B., Hanson, G.H. and Harrison, A.E. 1997. Spillovers, Foreign Investment and Export

Behavior, Journal of International Economics, 43(1-2), 103-132.

6. Akoorie, M. and Enderwick, P. 1992. The International Operations of New Zealand Companies,

Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 9(1), 51-69.

7. Antoncic, B. and Hisrich, R.D. 2000. An Integrative Conceptual Model, in: L.-P. Dana (Ed.),

Global Marketing Co-operation and Networks, International Business Press, New York, pp. 17-

35.

8. Autio, E. 1994. New Technology-Based Firms as Agents of R&D and Innovation, Technovation,

14(4), 259-273.

9. Autio, E. 2005. Creative Tension: The Significance of Ben Oviatt's and Patricia McDougall's

Article 'Toward a Theory of International New Ventures', Journal of International Business

Studies, 36(1), 9-19.

10. Autio, E. 2007. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. 2007 Global Report on High Growth

Entrepreneurship, Babson College and London Business School, Wellesley, MA/London.

Page | 32

11. Autio, E., Sapienza, H.J. and Almeida, J.G. 2000. Effects of Age at Entry, Knowledge Intensity,

and Imitability on International Growth, Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 909-924.

12. Axinn, C.N. 1988. Export Performance: Do Managerial Perceptions Make a Difference?,

International Marketing Review, 5(5), 67-71.

13. Baumol, W.J. 1990. Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive and Destructive, Journal of

Political Economy, 98(5), 893–921.

14. Baumol, W.J. 2002. The Free-Market Innovation Machine: Analyzing the Growth Miracle of

Capitalism, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

15. Bilkey, W.J. 1978. An Attempted Integration of the Literature on the Export Behavior of Firms,

Journal of International Business Studies, 9(1), 33-46.

16. Bloodgood, J.M., Sapienza, H.J. and Almeida, J.G. 1996. The Internationalization of New

HighPotential U.S. Ventures: Antecedents and Outcomes, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,

20(4), 61-76.

17. Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., Marrewijk, C. van and Witteloostuijn, A. van. 2006. Nations and

Firms in the Global Economy. An Introduction to International Economics and Business,

Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

18. 17

19. Buckley, P.J. 1989. Foreign Direct Investment by Small and Medium Sized Enterprises: The

Theoretical Background, Small Business Economics, 9(1), 67-78.

20. Carree, M.A. and Thurik, A.R. 2003. The Impact of Entrepreneurship on Economic Growth, in:

Z.J. Acs and D.B. Audretsch (Eds), Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research, Kluwer Academic

Publishers, Boston, MA, pp. 437-471.

21. Caves, R.E. 1971. International Corporations: The Industrial Economics of Foreign Investment,

Economica, 38(3), l-27.

22. Cavusgil, T. and Nevin, J.R. 1981. Internal Determinants of Export Marketing Behavior: An

Empirical Investigation, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 114-119.

Page | 33

23. Chetty, S.K. and Hamilton, R.K. 1993. Firm Level Determinants of Export Performance: A

MetaAnalysis, International Marketing Review, 10(3), 26-34.

24. Coviello, N.E. and Jones, M.V. 2004. Methodological Issues in International Entrepreneurship

Research, Journal of Business Venturing, 19(4), 485-508.

25. Coviello, N.E. and McAuley, A. 1999. Internationalisation and the Smaller Firm: A Review of

Contemporary Empirical Research, Management International Review, 39(3), 223-256.

26. Covin J. and Slevin D. 1989. Strategic Management of Small Firms in Hostile and Benign

Environments, Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75-87.

27. Davidsson, P., Delmar, F. and Wiklund, J. 2006. Entrepreneurship as Growth; Growth as

Entrepreneurship, in: P. Davidsson, F. Delmar and J. Wiklund (Eds), Entrepreneurship and the

Growth of Firms, Edward Elgar Publisher, Cheltenham, UK, pp. 21-38.

28. De Clercq, D., Hessels J. and van Stel, A. 2008. Knowledge Spillovers and New Ventures' Export

Orientation, Small Business Economics, 31(3), 283-303.

29. Dunning, J.H. 1981. International Production and the Multinational Enterprise, George Allen &

Unwin, London, UK.

30. Eriksson, K., Johanson, J., Majkgård, A. and Sharma, D.D. 1997. Experiential Knowledge and

Cost in the Internationalization Process, Journal of International Business Studies, 28(2), 337-

360.

31. Erramilli, M.K. and D'Souza, D.E. 1993. Venturing into Foreign Markets: The Case of the Small

Service Firm, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 17(3), 29-41.

32. Fletcher, R. 2001. A Holistic Approach to Internationalisation, International Business Review,

10(1), 25-49.

33. Ford, I.D. and Leonidou, L.C. 1991. Research Developments in International Marketing, in: S.J.

Paliwoda, New Perspectives on International Marketing, Routledge, London, pp. 3-32.

34. Fujita, M. 1995. Small and Medium Sized Transnational Corporations: Trends and Patterns of

Foreign Direct Investment, Small Business Economics, 7(3), 183-204.

Page | 34

35. Gartner, W. B. 1988. Who is an Entrepreneur? Is the Wrong Question, American Journal of

Small Business, 12(1), 11-32.

36. Greenaway, D., Gullstrand, J. and Kneller, R. 2008. Surviving Globalisation, Journal of

International Economics, 74(2), 264-277.

37. Greenaway D., Sousa N. and Wakelin K. 2004. Do Domestic Firms Learn to Export from

Multinationals?, European Journal of Political Economy, 20(4), 1027-1043.

38. 18

39. Hessels, J. 2007a. Innovation and International Involvement of Dutch SMEs, International

Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 4(3), 234-255.

40. Hessels, J. 2007b. Reactie op: Kentering in het Denken over Mondiale Strategieën (Response to:

A Shift in Thinking about Global Strategies), ESB dossier Globaliseren in Nederland, 92, 59.

41. Hessels, J. 2008. Overcoming Resource-Constraints through Internationalization? An Empirical

Analysis of European SMEs, Research Report H200806, EIM, Zoetermeer.

42. Hessels, J., Gelderen, M. van and Thurik, A.R. 2008a. Drivers of Entrepreneurial Aspirations at

the Country Level: The Role of Start-up Motivations and Social Security, International

Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, forthcoming.

43. Hessels, J., Gelderen, M. van and Thurik, A.R. 2008b. Entrepreneurial Aspirations, Motivations,

and their Drivers, Small Busines Economics, 31(3), forthcoming.

44. Hessels, J. and Stel, A.J. van. 2007. Export Orientation among New Ventures and Economic

Growth, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM) Report Series 2007-008, Erasmus

University Rotterdam, Rotterdam.

45. Hessels, J. and Terjesen, S. 2009. SME Choice of Direct and Indirect Export Modes: Resource

Dependency and Institutional Theory Perspectives, Small Business Economics, forthcoming.

46. Hollenstein, H. 2005. Determinants of International Activities: Are SMEs Different?, Small

Business Economics, 24(5), 431-450.

Page | 35

47. Hymer, S.H. 1976. The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign

Investment, MIT Press, Boston, MA.

48. Ibeh, K. 2006. Internationalisation and the Small Business, in: S. Carter and D. Jones-Evans

(Eds), Enterprise and Small Business: Principles, Practice and Policy, Pearson Education,

Harlow, UK, pp. 465-484.

49. Jaffe, E.D. and Pasternak, H. 1994. An Attitudinal Model to Determine the Export Intention of

NonExporting Small Manufacturers, International Marketing Review, 11(3), 17-32.

50. Johanson, J. and Vahlne, J.-E. 1977. The Internationalization Process of the Firm: A Model of

Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments, Journal of International

Business Studies, 8(1), 23-32.

51. Johanson, J. and Vahlne, J.-E. 1990. The Mechanism of Internationalization, International

Marketing Review, 7(4), 11-24.

52. Johnson, J.E. 2004. Factors Influencing the Early Internationalization of High Technology Start-

Ups: US and UK Evidence, Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 2(1-2), 139-154.

53. Keeble, D., Lawson, C., Smith, H., Moore, B. and Wilkinson, F. 1998. Internationalisation

Processes, Networking and Local Embeddedness in Technology-Intensive Small Firms, Small

Business Economics, 11(4), 327-342.

54. Kirzner, I.M. 1979. Perception, Opportunity and Profit: Studies in the Theory of

Entrepreneurship, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

55. Kneller, R. and Pisu, M. 2007. Industrial Linkages and Export Spillovers from FDI, The World

Economy, 30(1), 105-134.

56. Knight, G.A. and Cavusgil, S.T. 1996. The Born Global Firm: A Challenge to Traditional

Internationalization Theory, in: S.T. Cavusgil and T.K. Madsen. (Eds), Export Internationalizing

57. 19

58. Research - Enrichment and Challenges (Advances in International Marketing Series, Vol. 8), JAI

Press Inc, New York, pp. 11-26.

Page | 36

59. Knight, G.A. and Cavusgil, S.T. 2004. Innovation, Organizational Capabilities, and the Born-

Global Firm, Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2), 124-141.

60. Lefebvre, E. and Lefebvre, L.-A. 2002. Innovative Capabilities as Determinants of Export

Performance and Behaviour: A Longitudinal Study of Manufacturing SMEs, in: A. Kleinknecht

and P. Mohnen (Eds), Innovation and Firm Performance: Econometric Explorations of Survey

Data, Palgrave, London, pp. 281-309.

61. Lu, J.W. and Beamish, P.W. 2001. The Internationalization and Performance of SMEs, Strategic

Management Journal, 22(6/7), 565-586.

62. Lu, J.W. and Beamish, P.W. 2006. Partnering Strategies and Performance of SMEs' International

Joint Ventures, Journal of Business Venturing, 21(4), 461-486.

63. Lumpkin, G.T. and Dess, G.G. 1996. Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and

Linking it to Performance, The Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-258.

64. Luostarinen, R.K. and Welch, L.S. 1990. International Business Operations, Export Consulting

Ky, Helsinki.

65. McDougall, P.P. 1989. International versus Domestic Entrepreneurship: New Venture Strategic

Behaviour and Industry Structure, Journal of Business Venturing, 4(6), 387-400.

66. McDougall, P.P., Covin, J., Robinson, R. Jr., and Herron, L. 1994. The Effects of Industry

Growth and Strategic Breadth on New Venture Performance and Strategy Content, Strategic

Management Journal, 15(7), 537-553.

67. McDougall, P.P. and Oviatt, B.M. 1996. New Venture Internationalization, Strategic Change, and

Performance: A Follow-Up Study, Journal of Business Venturing, 11(1), 23-40.

68. McDougall, P.P. and Oviatt, B.M. 2000. International Entrepreneurship: The Intersection of Two

Research Paths, Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 902-906.

69. Miesenbock, K.J. 1988. Small Business and Exporting: A Literature Review, International Small

Business Journal, 6(2), 42-61.

Page | 37

70. Moen, Ø. and Servais, P. 2002. Born Global or Gradual Global? Examining the Export Behavior

of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises, Journal of International Marketing, 10(3), 49-72.

71. Muller, A. 2004. The Rise of Regionalism, ERIM PhD Series, Rotterdam.

72. North, D. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge

University Press, Cambridge.

73. OECD. 1997. Globalisation and Small and Medium Enterprises (Vol. 1), OECD, Paris.

74. Ohlin, B. 1933. Interregional and International Trade, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

75. Oviatt, B.M. and McDougall, P.P. 1994. Toward a Theory of International New Ventures, Journal

of International Business Studies, 25(1), 45-64.

76. Oviatt, B.M. and McDougall, P.P. 1995. Global Start-Ups: Entrepreneurs on a Worldwide Stage,

Academy of Management Executive, 9(2), 30-44.

77. 20

78. Oviatt, B.M. and McDougall, P.P. 1999. A Framework for Understanding Accelerated

International Entrepreneurship, in: A.M. Rugman and R.W. Wright (Eds), Research in Global

Strategic Management (Vol. 7), JAI Press, Stamford, CT, pp. 23-40.

79. Oviatt, B.M. and McDougall, P.P. 2005. Defining International Entrepreneurship and Modeling

the Speed of Internationalization, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 537-553.

80. Parker, S.C. 2004. The Economics of Self-Employment and Entrepreneurship, Cambridge

University Press, Cambridge, UK.

81. Preston, L. and Heller, C.O. 1997. Special Issue on Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the

Global Economy, Small Business Economics, 9(1), 1-85.

82. Rasmussen, E.S., Madsen T.K. and Evangelista, F. 2001. The Founding of the Born Global

Company in Denmark and Australia: Sensemaking and Networking, Asia Pacific Journal of

Marketing and Logistics, 13(3), 75-107.

83. Rennie, M.W. 1993. Global Competitiveness: Born Global, The McKinsey Quarterly, 4, 45-52.

Page | 38

84. Reuber, A.R. and Fischer, E. 1997. The Influence of the Management Team's International

Experience on the Internationalization Behaviors of SMEs, Journal of International Business

Studies, 28(4), 807-825.

85. Reynolds, P.D. 1997. New and Small Firms in Expanding Markets, Small Business Economics,

9(1), 78-84.

86. Reynolds, P.D., Bosma, N., Autio, E., Hunt, S., De Bono, N., Servais, I., Lopez-Garcia, P. and

Chin, N. 2005. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: Data Collection Design and Implementation

19982003, Small Business Economics, 24(3), 205-231.

87. Ricardo, D. 1817. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, John Murray, London.

88. Roberts, E.B. and Senturia, T.A. 1996. Globalizing the Emerging High-Technology Company,

Industrial Marketing Management, 25(6), 491-506.

89. Root, F. 1994. Entry Strategies for International Markets, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.

90. Schumpeter, J.A. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development, Harvard University Press,

Cambridge, MA.

91. Schumpeter, J.A. 1950. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Harper and Sons, New York.

92. Shane, S. and Venkataraman, S. 2000. The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research,

Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.

93. Simpson, C.L. and Kujawa, D. 1974. The Export Decision Process: An Empirical Inquiry,

Journal of International Business Studies, 5(1), 107-117.

94. Smith, A. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Methuan and

Co., London.

95. Stel, A.J. van. 2006. Empirical Analysis of Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth

(International Studies in Entrepreneurship Series, Vol. 13), Springer Science, New York.

96. Terjesen, S. and Hessels, J. 2009. Varieties of Export-Oriented Entrepreneurship in Asia, Asia

Pacific Journal of Management, 25(2), forthcoming.

Page | 39

97. Vernon, R. 1966. International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle,

Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(2), 190-207.

98. 21

99. Welch, L.S. and Luostarinen, R.K. 1988. Internationalization: Evolution of a Concept, Journal of

General Management, 14(2), 35-55.

100. Wennekers, A.R.M. 2006. Entrepreneurship at Country Level; Economic and Non-

Economic Determinants, ERIM PhD Series, Rotterdam.

101. Wennekers, A.R.M. and Thurik, A.R. 1999. Linking Entrepreneurship and Economic

Growth, Small Business Economics, 13(1), 27-55.

102. Westhead, P. 1995. Exporting and Non-Exporting Small Firms in Great Britain,

International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 1(2), 6-36.

103. Williamson, O.E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications,

The Free Press, New York.

104. Williamson, O.E. 1998. The Institutions of Governance, American Economic Review,

88(2), 75-79.

105. Yeoh, P.-L. 2004. International Learning: Antecedents and Performance Implications

among Newly Internationalizing Companies in an Exporting Context, International Marketing

Review, 21(4-5), 511-535.

106. Yeung, H.W.-C. 2002. Entrepreneurship in international business: An institutional

perspective, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(1), 26-61.

107. Young, S. 1987. Business Strategy and the Internationalization of Business: Recent

Approaches, Managerial and Decision Economics, 8(1), 31-40.

108. Young, S., Hood N. and Dunlop S. 1988. Global Strategies, Multinational Subsidiary

Roles and Economic Impact in Scotland, Regional Studies, 22(6), 487-497.

109. Zahra, S.A. 2005. A Theory of International New Ventures: A Decade of Research,

Journal of International Business Studies, 36(1), 20-28.

Page | 40

110. Zahra, S.A., Ireland, R. and Hitt, M.A. 2000. International Expansion by New Venture

Firms: International Diversity, Mode of Market Entry, Technological Learning, and Performance,

Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 925-950.

Page | 41