Final focused removal assessment rpt - Libby sister sites ... · Hawaii Staging &...

:>••••••• ...«xxx

»\ ' x ¥*4

SFUHD RECORDS CTR100458

FINAL

Focused Removal Assessment Report

Libby Sister Sites (Asbestos Project) - EPA Region 9for

Hawaii Staging & Lightin^Funtastic Party Rental & SupplyFormer Vermiculite of Hawaii

842A Mapunapuna StreetHonolulu, HI 96819

July 2001

Contract No. DTRS57-99-D-00017Task Order No. C0014

Prepared for:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency -Region 9

Emergency Response Office75 Hawthorne Street SGD6San Francisco, CA 94105

Prepared by:U.S. Department of Transportation

Research and Special Programs AdministrationJohn A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center

Environmental Engineering Division, DTS-3355 Broadway, Kendall Square

Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142

and

COM Federal Programs CorporationOne Cambridge Place50 Hampshire Street

Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139

This page was intentionally left blank.

DOT Volpe CenterCDM Federal Programs Corporation

RA Report - Former Vermiculite of Hawaii. Honolulu. HI07/2001

FINAL

Focused Removal Assessment ReportLibby Sister Sites (Asbestos Project) -EPA Region 9

forHawaii Staging & Lighting/Funtastic Party Rental & Supply

Former Vermiculite of Hawaii842A Mapunapuna Street

Honolulu, HI 96819

July 2001

Contract No. DTRS57-99-D-00017Task Order No. C0014

Prepared by: .Regina Clifford DateCOM Federal Environmental Scientist

Reviewed by: ..... ...?< . «*/*)..................................................7.:./?:.<?./.Anni H. Autio, P.E. DateCDM Federal Task Leader

Tim Wall DateCDM Federal Project Manager

Approved by: ...£^..#..9?.....................................................^^j£» RoseMary Gustin Date

CDM Federal QA Director

Approved by: .......................................................................................................Mark E. Raney DateVolpe Center Project Manager

Approved by: .......................................................................................................Hedy Ficklin DateEPA Project Manager/ On-Scene Coordinator


RA Report - Former Vermiculite of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI07/2001

Document Revision Log

REVISION—

DATEJuly 2001

CHANGESFinal Report


RA Report - Former Vermiculite of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI07/2001

Executive SummaryThe U.S. Department of Transportation's John A. Volpe National TransportationSystems (Volpe) Center has an Interagency Agreement (IAG) with the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 9 for environmental engineering andrelated support. The Volpe Center, its contractor CDM Federal Programs Corporation(CDM Federal), and CDM Federal's subcontractor Pacific Environmental Services, Inc.(PES), have been requested by EPA Region 9 to conduct focused removal assessments(RAs) at eight locations (i.e., Libby Sister Sites). These locations are eight of theapproximate twenty-one locations that have been identified as having received ore orvermiculite from Libby, Montana, according to U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and/orBureau of Mines publications. Each of the sites has performed either small batchexfoliation, used vermiculite as part of a manufacturing process, or sold vermiculite.

This RA report addresses the former Vermiculite of Hawaii facility now occupied byHawaii Staging & Lighting/Funtastic Party Rental & Supply, located at 842AMapunapuna Street in Honolulu, Hawaii. All work for this assessment was conductedin accordance with Revision 1 of the Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) for the LibbySister Sites (Asbestos Project) - Emergency Response and Preliminary AssessmentSupport (CDM Federal 2001).

The only potential contaminant of concern being investigated at these sites is asbestos,specifically amphibole asbestos (tremolite/actinolite) associated with vermiculitemined from Libby, Montana. Asbestos fibers are odorless and tasteless and vary inlength, structure, and chemical composition. It is believed the toxicity varies with themineralogy and morphology of asbestos, however exposure to any type of asbestoscan be fatal. Amphibole asbestos (tremolite/actinolite), the form found at Libby, isconsidered by many to be the most toxic.

Human health risk from asbestos is primarily due to inhalation exposure to airbornefibers. The objectives of this RA were to determine if any potential sources oftremolite/actinolite asbestos are present at the site and to determine whether anypotential sources (vermiculite product, ore, waste, etc.) had been transported off-siteeither for disposal, private uses by employees, or direct sale to the public.

Potential sources aie likely to be related to contamination from the processing ofLibby ore or vermiculite. Potential sources were investigated by sampling variousmedia (soil, waste/product, ambient air, and dust inside buildings); gathering andverifying current and historical information on the site; and documenting anyobserved evidence of vermiculite product or waste. Fieldwork conducted for this RAincluded a facility tour, interviews with site contacts, and sampling activities.


RA Report - Former Vermiculite of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI Hi06/2001

Executive Summary

Hawaii Staging & Lighting/Funtastic Party Rental is the current tenant on theproperty. Limited history is known about the property other than that Vermiculite ofHawaii was a previous tenant on the site. The age of the buildings on site was notdetermined but, based on the discovery of vermiculite around and inside one of thestructures, the structure is estimated to be at least twenty years old. The facility iscurrently used by Hawaii Staging & Lighting for storage and operations.

Sampling activities were conducted to assess whether site soil, suspect vermiculiteproduct, dust, and ambient air contain tremolite/actinolite asbestos. All sampling andanalysis activities were conducted in accordance with Revision 1 of the Sampling andAnalysis Plan (SAP). Results of sampling and analysis activities are as follows:

• Soil Sampling: Fifteen grab soil samples (including one duplicate) werecollected from unpaved portions of the site. CDM's laboratory in Denver,Colorado processed (i.e., dried, homogenized, and split) the soil samples prior toshipment to Reservoirs for analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM).

Samples PA2-00093 and PA2-00094 of the fifteen soil samples analyzed contain 1percent or greater asbestos and are therefore classified as ACMs by the NationalEmission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP). Both samples werecollected from the northern face of the eastern annex to Building 4. Six other soilsamples (including the duplicate) contain a trace amount (less than 1 percent byvisual estimate) of tremolite/actinolite asbestos. These samples represent soilareas east of Building 1, along the northern border of the site, and outside theeastern wall of Building 4. The decision maker (EPA) will need to evaluate what,if any, removal action activities will be required in areas where ACMs wereidentified. Additionally, EPA will need to evaluate if the low levels (trace) foundin the soil samples will require additional verification, possibly via an electrontechnique such as Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) or Scanning ElectronMicroscopy (SEM) and/or if additional sampling is warranted.

• Product Sampling: Two vermiculite product samples were collected fromprocessed vermiculite found in Building 4 (Sample PA2-00112) and from the rawvermiculite ore along the exterior, eastern wall of Building 4 (Sample PA2-00013).The two samples contain a trace level of tremolite/actinolite asbestos and SamplePA2-00113 also contains 11 percent chrysotile asbestos and is thereforeconsidered an ACM by NESHAP.


RA Report - Former Vermiculrie of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI06/2001

Executive Summary

The decision maker (EPA) will need to evaluate what, if any, removal actionactivities will be required for the ACM identified. Additionally theEPA will need to evaluate if the low levels (trace) found in other productsample will require additional verification, possibly via an electron techniquesuch as Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) or Scanning ElectronMicroscopy (SEM) and/or if additional sampling is warranted.

Microvacuum Dust Sampling: Four microvacuum dust samples were collectedfrom the four on-site buildings. Three of the dust samples contained bothtremolite/actinolite and chrysotile asbestos structures indicating that asbestosfibers were at one time airborne in Buildings 2, 3 and 4. The fourth samplecontained chrysotile structures. No asbestos structures were detected in the fieldblanks (analytical sensitivity: < 32 s/cm2).

Ambient Air Sampling: Four ambient air samples were collected from withinthe on-site buildings. No asbestos structures were detected in the four ambientair samples or in the field blanks. Analytical sensitivity was <0.0010 s/cc.


RA Report - Former VermkxiNte of Hawaii. Honolulu, HI06/2001

Executive Summary



RA Report - Former Vermiculite of Hawaii. Honolulu, HI vi06/2001

Acronyms and AbbreviationsACMCOM FederalCOCDQOEDREPAIAGIDISOL/minumMCEmmMTNESHAPMOSHPESPLMQCRAs/ccs/cm2

SAPSEMTEMTLVTOVolpe Center°F

Asbestos-Containing MaterialsCOM Federal Programs Corporationchain-of-custodydata quality objectiveEnvironmental Data ResourcesU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyInteragency AgreementIdentificationInternational Standards Organizationliters per minutemicronmixed cellulose estermillimeterMontanaNational Emission Standards for Hazardous Air PollutantsNational Institute of Occupational Safety and HealthPacific Environmental Services, Inc.Polarized Light Microscopyquality controlRemoval Assessmentstructures per cubic centimeterstructures per square centimeterSampling and Analysis Planscanning electron microscopytransmission electron microscopythreshold limit valuetask orderJohn A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Centerdegrees Fahrenheit

DOT Volpe CenterCDM Federal Programs CorporationRA Report - Former Vernikxilite of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI07G001 VII

Acronyms and Abbreviations


DOT Volpe CenterCDM Federal Programs CorporationRA Report - Former Vermiculile of Hawaii, Honolulu. HI07/2001 VIII

ContentsExecutive Summary .............................................................................................................. iii

Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................. viiSection 1 - Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1-1

1.1 Project Background ................................................................................... 1-11.2 Project Objectives ...................................................................................... 1-31.3 Project Organization ................................................................................. 1-3

Section 2 - Site Description ................................................................................................. 2-12.1 Site Location ............................................................................................... 2-12.2 Site Characteristics .................................................................................... 2-1

2.2.1 Meteorological Data ..................................................................... 2-12.2.2 Existing Site Description ............................................................. 2-1

2.3 Site History ................................................................................................. 2-2Section 3 - Site Field and Sampling Activities ................................................................. 3-1

3.1 Interviews with Site Contacts .................................................................. 3-13.2 Soil and Waste/Product Sampling ......................................................... 3-2

3.2.1 Sampling Activities ...................................................................... 3-23.2.2 Deviations from the SAP ............................................................. 3-3

3.3 Microvacuum Dust Sampling .................................................................. 3-33.3.1 Sampling Activities ...................................................................... 3-33.3.2 Deviations from the SAP ............................................................. 3-4

3.4 Ambient Air Sampling .............................................................................. 3-43.4.1 Sampling Activities ...................................................................... 3-43.4.2 Deviations from the SAP ............................................................. 3-4

Section 4 - Field and Analytical Results ........................................................................... 4-14.1 Soil Sampling Results ............................................................................... 4-1

4.1.1 Soil Sample Processing ................................................................ 4-14.1.2 Soil and Waste/Product Analytical Results ............................. 4-24.1.3 Data Quality Assessment ............................................................ 4-2

4.2 Microvacuum Dust Results ....................................................... .............. 4-34.2.1 Sample Results .............................................................................. 4-34.2.2 Data Quality Assessment ............................................................ 4-3

4.3 Ambient Air Results .................................................................................. 4-44.3.1 Sample Results .............................................................................. 4-44.3.2 Data Quality Assessment ............................................................ 4-4

4.4 Asbestos-Containing Materials Survey .................................................. 4-44.4.1 Vermiculite Insulation ................................................................. 4-44.4.2 Other Suspect Asbestos-Containing Materials ......................... 4-5

4.5 Historic Sample Results ............................................................................ 4-5

DOT Volpe CenterCDM Federal Programs CorporationRA Report - Former Vermiculite of Hawaii. Honolulu, HI060001 IX

Contents

Section 5 - Summary of Findings ...................................................................................... 5-1

Section 6 - References .......................................................................................................... 6-1

Tables

4-1 Results of Soil Sample Analysis ........................................................................... 4-64-2 Results of Microvacuum Dust Sample Analysis ................................................ 4-74-3 Results of Ambient Air Sample Analysis ............................................................ 4-84-4 Data Quality Assessment for Soil Samples ......................................................... 4-94-5 Data Quality Assessment for Microvacuum Dust Samples ........................... 4-104-6 Data Quality Assessment for Ambient Air Samples ...................................... 4-114-7 Summary of Suspect Asbestos-Containing Materials ..................................... 4-12

Figures

1-1 Site Location Plan ................................................................................................... 1-52-1 Site Layout Plan ...................................................................................................... 2-33-1 Soil Sample Location Plan ..................................................................................... 3-53-2 Microvacuum Dust Sample Location Plan ......................................................... 3-63-3 Ambient Air Sample Location Plan ..................................................................... 3-74-1 Soil Sample Results .............................................................................................. 4-134-2 Microvacuum Dust Sample Results ................................................................... 4-144-3 Ambient Air Sample Results ............................................................................... 4-15

Appendices

Appendix A Copies of Field Log Books and Site NotesAppendix B Field Sample Data SheetsAppendix C Chain-of-Custody RecordsAppendix D Photographic LogAppendix E Information Collected During Site InterviewsAppendix F Laboratory ReportsAppendix G ACM Survey Results

DOT Volpe CenterCDM Federal Programs CorporationRA Report - Former Vermiculite of Hawaii. Honolulu, HIOS/2001

Section 1IntroductionThe U.S. Department of Transportation's John A. Volpe National TransportationSystems Center (Volpe Center) has an Interagency Agreement with the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 9 for environmental engineering andrelated support associated with site assessment functions and site cleanup activities(removal support).

Since November 1999, the Environmental Engineering Division (DTS-33) of the VolpeCenter has been providing EPA Region 8 with immediate environmental engineeringand site assessment support at Libby, Montana. The Volpe Center, its contractor CDMFederal Programs Corporation (CDM Federal), and CDM Federal's subcontractorPacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES), have been requested by EPA Region 9 toconduct focused removal assessments (RAs) at eight locations (i.e., Libby Sister sites)within EPA Region 9, which may have been contaminated from vermiculiteshipments from Libby, Montana. These locations are just eight of the twenty-onelocations identified, via the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) or Bureau of Minespublications, to receive ore or vermiculite from Libby. Each of the sites has performedeither small batch exfoliation, used vermiculite as part of a manufacturing process, orsold vermiculite.

This RA report addresses the former Vermiculite of Hawaii facility now occupied byHawaii Staging & Lighting/Funtastic Party Rental & Supply, located at 842AMapunapuna Street in Honolulu, Hawaii (Figure 1-1). All work for this assessmentwas conducted in accordance with Revision 1 of the Sampling and Analysis Plan(SAP) for the Libby Sister Sites (Asbestos Project) - Emergency Response andPreliminary Assessment Support (CDM Federal 2001).

1.1 Project Background

EPA has determined that vermiculite ore mined from mountains near Libby, Montanais contaminated with amphibole asbestos (tremolite/actinolite). Ore was shippedthroughout the United States as processed and unprocessed material. EPA has beenconducting various investigations to determine where other potentially contaminatedproperties outside of Libby may have been impacted by the Libby vermiculite miningoperations. To advance these investigations, EPA Region 9 requested that the VolpeCenter conduct RAs at eight Libby Sister sites. In late February and early March 2001,three sites in Arizona (Phoenix vicinity), one site in Hawaii (Honolulu), and three sitesin California (Los Angeles and San Francisco areas) were investigated. An additionalsite in the Los Angeles region will be investigated at a later date.


RA Report - Former Vermiculite of Hawaii. Honolulu. HI 1-107/2001

Section 1Introduction

The only potential contaminant of concern being investigated at the Libby Sister sitesis asbestos, specifically amphibole asbestos (tremolite/actinolite) associated withvermiculite mined from Libby, Montana. Asbestos fibers are odorless and tastelessand vary in length, structure, and chemical composition. Fibers are microscopic andenvironmentally persistent. They do not evaporate, burn or dry out from heat, orerode in water. It is believed the toxicity varies with the mineralogy and morphologyof asbestos, however exposure to any type of asbestos can be fatal. Amphiboleasbestos (tremolite/actinolite), the form found at Libby, is considered by many to bethe most toxic.

According to historical mining records, as much as 80 percent of the world'svermiculite came from the W.R. Grace Vermiculite Mine on Zonolite Mountain,approximately seven miles northeast of Libby. Vermiculite is a mineral used invarious building materials and textiles. Dispersed within the enormous deposit ofvermiculite on Zonolite Mountain is the mineral tremolite/actinolite, a rare andexceedingly toxic form of asbestos. Over the roughly sixty year life of the mine,tremolite/actinolite asbestos was released into the environment as a by-product of themining and ore-processing activities.

Edward Alley began operating the Zonolite Mine in 1924. In 1925, Great NorthernRailroad shipped the first boxcar of "Zonolite" from Libby to an Ohio company thatused the material to insulate bank vaults, office safes, and filing cabinets. Other firmsused the material to make building boards and roofing materials. Processing thematerial was straightforward. Vermiculite ore was stripped from the mine and hauledin trucks to a mill, where it was separated into various commercial sizes through ascreening system. Some ore was shipped untouched. Other material was shipped toan expansion plant where it was run through ovens at about 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit(°F), causing the material to expand to 15 times its original size. In 1939, Alley'sZonolite Mine merged with another mining company and eventually became knownas the Zonolite Co.

In 1963, W.R. Grace & Co. bought the Zonolite Co., expanded the operation andincreased production. From the 1960s through the 1980s, millions of tons of Libbyvermiculite ore were shipped by rail to W.R. Grace plants and other companies inthirty states and six foreign countries.


RA Report-Former VormicuIKe of Hawaii. Honolulu. HI 1-207/2001


1.2 Project Objectives

The objectives of this RA were to:

• Determine if any potential sources of tremolite/actinolite asbestos contaminationare present at the site related to the processing of Libby ore or vermiculite.Potential sources were investigated by sampling and analyzing various media atthe site such as soil, waste/product, ambient air, and dust inside buildings;

• Gather and verify current and historical information on the site and anyassociated Libby vermiculite shipments;

• Document any observed evidence of vermiculite product or other related wastewith detailed notes and digital photographs; and

• Determine whether any potential sources of tremolite/actinolite asbestos(vermiculite product, ore, waste, etc.) had been transported off-site, either fordisposal, private use by employees or direct sale to the public.

1.3 Project Organization

Organization and responsibilities specific to this RA are listed in this section. For thedata collection effort on this RA, key management personnel were as follows:

Individual Role

Hedy Ficklin EPA Project Manager/On-Scene CoordinatorMark Raney Volpe Center Project ManagerPaul Kudarauskas Volpe Center Field Team LeaderTim Wall CDM Federal Task Order ManagerRoseMary Gustin CDM Federal QA DirectorKrista Lippoldt CDM Federal Quality Assurance CoordinatorAnni Autio CDM Federal Task LeaderDave Michailof CDM Federal Field Team LeaderGreg Parana PES Field Team Member

The entire field and data gathering effort for this site was conducted by a teamconsisting of the EPA On-Scene Coordinator, Volpe Center field team leader, CDMFederal field team leader, and PES field team member.


RA Report - Former Vermiculite of Hawaii. Honolulu. HI 1-307/2001




RA Report - Former Vemniculfte of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 1-407/2001




RA Report - Former Vemniculite of Hawaii. Honolulu, HI 1 -607/2001

Section 2Site DescriptionThis section describes the site location and characteristics and includes an overview ofsite history based on background information provided by EPA and informationgathered during the field investigation.

2.1 Site Location

The site is located at 842A Mapunapuna Street in Honolulu, Hawaii. It is situatedapproximately 1.5 miles northeast of Honolulu International Airport in a mixedcommercial, military, and residential area.

The site is located at the following geographic coordinates (USGS1999):

Latitude (North): 21.3443Longitude (West): 157.9015Universal Tranverse Mercator (UTM): Zone 4UTM X (Meters): 613908EUTM Y (Meters): 2360513N

2.2 Site Characteristics

2.2.1 Meteorological Data

Temperatures in Honolulu range from an average low of 67.1°F to an average high of84.6°F. Honolulu receives an average of 20.21 inches of rain annually (WRCC 2001).

2.2.2 Existing Site Description

Information in this section was compiled from notes and observations made by thefield team during field activities on March 1, 2001.

The property is owned by Bill Murray of Masa Fujioka and is leased to HawaiiStaging & Lighting/Funtastic Party Rental, who uses the facility for party productstorage and rental.

The site consists of four buildings (see Figure 2-1). Building 1 is of masonry blockconstruction and has a flat roof. The building is used as an office and has a solecentral HVAC system. Building 2 is also of masonry block construction but it has agalvanized, peaked metal roof and is used for storage. Building 3 is of wood frameconstruction and has a sloped galvanized steel roof. The building, characterized by


RA Report - Fanner Vermiculite of Hawaii. Honolulu. HI 2-107/2001

Section 2Site Description

two sheet metal sides and two masonry block sides, is used for storage. Building 4 hasmasonry block construction on most sides of the building and has a galvanized steelroof. A short chain-linked fence has been erected along one-half of one wall. Thebuilding is used to store staging equipment.

Vegetative buffer zones edge the property. An unpaved area is also located in front ofthe office building. Two visible traces of vermiculite were found on the property.Vermiculite was found about ground level on the west side of property behindBuilding 4. In addition, some processed vermiculite pressed against the inner walls ofBuilding 4 in random spots. These areas ranged in size from three square inches up totwo square feet. Vermiculite in not currently used on-site.

2.3 Site History

The following information based on interviews conducted with the current owner ofthe site as part of conducting this RA on March 1,2001.

Hawaii Staging & Lighting/Funtastic Party Rental is the current tenant on theproperty. Limited history is known about the property other than that Vermiculite ofHawaii was a previous tenant on the site. The age of the buildings on site was notdetermined but, based on the discovery of vermiculite around and inside one of thestructures, the structure is estimated to be at least twenty years old. The facility iscurrently used by Hawaii Staging & Lighting for storage and operations.


RA Report-Former VermicuWeof Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 2-207/2001

r.

PAVED

LAWN

BUILDING1

PAVEDBUILDING

2

BUILDING3

PAVED

BUILDING4

MAPUNAPUNA STREETrLEGEND

— —— — —— PROPERTY BOUNDARY

NOT TO SCALESITE LAYOUT PLAN

HQUREMFOCUSED REMOVAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

FORMER VERMICULITE OF HAWAII, HONOLULU. HAWAII

Mil: 7/2001Fl£ NO.: OI4J-100 NO.: 2603-014

2-3

Section 2Site Description



RA Report - Former Vermiculite of Hawaii, Honolulu. HI 2-407/2001

Section 3Site Field and Sampling ActivitiesThis section describes field activities conducted on March 1,2001 as part of this RA.Field activities included a facility tour, interviews with site contacts/employees andsampling activities (soil, waste/product, ambient air, and dust from within buildingsof concern). All field work followed the procedures identified in Revision 1 of the SAP.The SAP was written to guide field sampling and analysis activities at the eight LibbySisters sites in Region 9 currently being investigated. It provides general guidelinesfor the number and type of samples to be taken as well as analytical procedures to befollowed. Actual numbers of samples were determined in the field based on observedsite conditions. It is important to note that the SAP will also be used to conduct RAs atan additional thirteen sites that have been identified by EPA to have received ore orvermiculite from Libby.

For the former Vermiculite of Hawaii (Hawaii Staging & Lighting/Funtastic PartyRental) site in Honolulu, the field team collected fifteen soil samples (including onefield duplicate), two samples of suspected vermiculite product, four compositemicrovacuum dust samples (plus two blanks), and four ambient air samples (plus twoblanks).

3.1 Interviews with Site Contacts

This section summarizes information provided in interviews conducted during fieldand sampling activities on March 1,2001. Notes from interviews are included incopies of the field logbooks in Appendix A.

Interview with the Property Owner

An interview between property owner and the RA field team was conducted duringthe site walkover on March 1,2001. The only two tenants discussions were about thecurrent occupant, Hawaii Staging & Lighting/Funtastic Party Rental, and the formeroccupant, Vermiculite of Hawaii. Whether or not Vermiculite of Hawaii everconducted business on this site could not be confirmed by outside sources. It wasstated during the RA field team interview that earlier interviews, including those withneighborhood businesses, did not provide any further information about Vermiculiteof Hawaii. The neighboring businesses have changed over time but the buildingshave remained stationary.

The property representative did not have any records on vermiculite shipmentsalthough government resources have evidence of two such shipments. Vermiculite isnot presently used on-site.


RA Report - Former VerniicuWe of Hawaii. Honolulu, HI 3-107/2001

Section 3Site Field and Sampling Activities

3.2 Soil and Waste/Product Sampling

3.2.1 Sampling Activities

Soil and waste/product sampling activities conducted on March 1,2001, includingsample identification, collection, decontamination of sampling equipment,documentation, custody, packaging and shipping, were conducted in accordance withRevision 1 of the SAP, except as noted in Section 3.2.2.

Fifteen soil samples including one duplicate (Sample PA2-00095) were collectedaround the perimeter of the property and within Building 4. Of the soil samplescollected, two samples (Samples PA2-00089 and PA2-00090) were taken on thesouthern perimeter next to Building No. 3; five samples including the duplicate(Samples PA2-00091, PA2-00092, PA2-00093, PA2-00094, and PA2-00095) werecollected from the southeastern corner of Building 4; three samples (Samples PA2-00096, PA2-00097; and PA2-00098) were taken from the northern perimeter line; onesample (PA2-00111) was taken from inside Building 4; and two samples (PA2-00114and PA2-00115) were taken from the western border behind Building 4 (see Figure 3-1)-

A walkthrough of the on-site buildings was performed to identify vermiculiteinsulation or waste product. Processed vermiculite was discovered within Building 4and raw vermiculite ore was also found along the exterior, western wall of Building 4.Two samples of product were collected from these locations.

All soil and product samples were grab samples. Sample data sheets are located inAppendix B. The majority of grab samples were collected from the top three inches ofsoil. One grab sample, PA2-00111, was sampled under grating installed in Building 4at a top/bottom depth of four inches/eight inches, respectively. Samples werecollected using a stainless steel scoop. Once an area of soil was selected a zipper-lockbag was filled at least half full. Homogenization was performed for all samples bymanipulating the sample material inside the zipper-locked bag. All samples weredouble bagged and labeled with a unique identification number according toprocedures outlined in Revision 1 of the SAP. Double the volume of soil was collectedfor the duplicate sample. After homogenization, the sample was split equally into twozipper-lock bags.

The stainless steel scoop used to collect the samples was decontaminated betweeneach sample location. Decontamination was conducted in accordance with Revision 1of the SAP. Rinse water was discharged onto the ground at the site and allowed toevaporate.


RA Report- Former VecmicuMe of Hawaii, Honolulu. HI 3-207/2001

SectionsSite Field and Sampling Activities

Sample bags were placed in a cooler for shipment to CDM's laboratory in Denver,Colorado for processing (i.e., drying, sieving, homogenization, and splitting). Chain-of-custody (COC) forms are presented in Appendix C. All custody, packaging andshipping procedures were conducted in accordance with Revision 1 of the SAP.

3.2.2 Deviations from the SAP

Soil sampling was conducted in accordance with Revision 1 of the SAP. No deviationswere made from the SAP.

3.3 Microvacuum Dust Sampling


Microvacuum dust sampling activities conducted on March 1,2001, including sampleidentification, collection, documentation, custody, packaging, and shipping wereconducted in accordance with Revision 1 of the SAP, except as noted in Section 3.3.2.

The microvacuum dust sample was collected by drawing air through a mixedcellulose ester (MCE) filter (0.45 micrometer [um] pore size) at a flow rate of 2.0 litersper minute (L/min) for two minutes at the sampling location. The sampling wasperformed using a battery-operated sampling pump. In order to obtain a morerepresentative dust sample, the sample was taken from several areas within eachbuilding. PES vacuumed three separate 100 square centimeter (cm2) sampling areasper sampling cassette. Each cassette was assigned a unique index identificationnumber. Following the collection of the samples, the sampling equipment wasdecontaminated by wet wiping until all visible dust was removed.

Four composite microvacuum dust sample (Samples PA2-00105 through PA2-00108)were collected from three separate horizontal surfaces inside each of four on-sitebuildings. Sample locations are shown on Figure 3-2. For quality control, two fieldblanks (Samples PA2-00109 and PA2-00110) were submitted with the microvacuumsamples. The purpose of the field blanks was to determine if contamination of thecassettes may have occurred during sample handling, shipping, and preparation. Thesample and blanks were submitted to the laboratory with a COC form via overnightmail. Field sample data sheets are included in Appendix B. COC records are includedin Appendix C.


RA Report - Fanner VermicuMa of Hawaii. Honolulu. HI 3-307/2001

Section 3Site Field and Sampling Activities


Microvacuum dust sampling was conducted in accordance with Revision 1 of theSAP. No deviations were made from the SAP.

3.4 Ambient Air Sampling


Ambient air sampling activities conducted on March 1, 2001 including sampleidentification, collection, documentation, custody, packaging and shipping wereconducted in accordance with Revision 1 of the SAP, except as noted in Section 3.4.2.

Ambient air samples were collected by drawing air through a MCE filter (0.45pore size) over an approximately seven to eight hour sampling period. The sampleswere collected at a height of five feet above the floor, and air was pulled through thecassettes with electric sampling pumps. The goal of the sampling was to drawapproximately 4,000 liters of air through the cassette. Each cassette was assigned aunique index identification number. Following the collection of the samples, thesampling equipment was decontaminated by wet wiping until all visible dust wasremoved.

Four ambient air samples (Samples PA2-00099 through PA2-00102) were collectedfrom the on-site buildings. The sample locations are shown on Figure 3-3. For qualitycontrol, two field blanks (Samples PA2-00103 and PA2-00104) were submitted withthe ambient air samples. The purpose of the field blanks was to determine ifcontamination of the cassettes may have occurred during sample handling, shipping,and preparation. All samples and blanks were submitted to the laboratory with aCOC form via overnight mail. Field sample data sheets are included in Appendix B.COC records are included in Appendix C.


All ambient air sampling was conducted in accordance with Revision 1 of the SAPwith the exception that a volume of 4,000 liters was not collected for the air samplessince Hawaii Stage and Lighting required the sampling team to leave the property atthe end of business hours. A minimum volume of 3,655 liters of air was collected oneach of the samples.


RA Report - Former VermicuMe of Hawaii. Honolulu. HI 3-407/2001

171T

TTTTTTTTTTTrr

PAVED

• PAS-00098

• PA2-00097PAVED

PA2-00096

PAVED

~iLAWN • PA2-00087

• PA2-00088

BUILDING

BUILDING2

BUILDING •-

PAS-00092 •

PA8-00093 •PAS-00094/

PAS-00095 <DUP.) •4- PAS-00113

4- PAS-00112

PAS-00111

PAS-00115

BULDW6

4

PA2-00114

PAS-00089

PAS-00090

PAS-00091

MAPUNAPUNA STREET

NOT TO SCALE

LEGEND

PAS-00114

PROPERTY BOUNDARYPRODUCT SAMPLE LOCATION

SOL SAMPLE LOCATION

SAMPLE DENTFICATION NUMBER

SCHL SAMPLE LOCATION PLANHQURE3-1

FOCUSED REMOVAL ASSESSMENT REPORTFORMER VERMBUUTE OF HAWAII, HONOLULU, HAWAII

CDM Mtnl Frofruu Corporation

QMt 7/2001FU tKX: OI4.J-100 NO. 260J-OI4

3-5

MAPUNAPUNA STREET

NOT TO SCALE

LEGEND

— — — —— PROPERTY BOUNDARY

§o COMPONENTS OF MKROVACUUM DUST COMPOSITE SAMPLE

PA2-0010S SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER

MKJROVACUUM DUST SAMPLE LOCATION PLANRQUREW

FOCUSED REMOVAL ASSESSMENT REPORTFORMER VERHCUUTE OF HAWAII, HONOLULU. HAWAII

JOtMA-MLrt W nitmantina» iitnm com

Mlt 7/2001FU MO.: Ot4_J-2DO MO.: 2603-014

3-6

PAVED

LAWN

BUILDING1

PA2-00102

PAVED

PA2-00100 X

BUILDING2

X PAS-00101

BUILDING3

PAVED

BUILDING PAS-00099 X

_lMAPUNAPUNA STREET

NOT TO SCALE

— LEGEND

— — —— PROPERTY BOUNDARY

X AMBENT AIR SAMPLE LOCATION

PA2-00100 SAMPLE DENTFICATION NUMBER

AMBIENT AIR SAMPLE LOCATION PLANRQUREM

FOCUSED REMOVAL ASSESSMENT REPORTFORMER VERMCUUTE OF HAWAI. HONOUJUJ. HAWAII

OWE 6/2001FU ».: 014J-JDO NO.: 2603-014

3-7

SectionsSite Field and Sampling Activities



RA Report - Former Vermkxiite of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 3-807/2001

Section 4Field and Analytical ResultsThis section presents results of analyses on soil and product samples, microvacuumdust samples, and ambient air samples, as well as results of an asbestos-containingmaterials (ACM) survey conducted by PES at this site.

4.1 Soil Sampling Results

4.1.1 Soil Sample Processing

Soil samples were submitted to CDM's laboratory in Denver, Colorado for processingbefore they were shipped under chain-of-custody (COC) to an asbestos laboratory foranalysis. All samples were received under strict COC procedures and prepared inaccordance with procedure ISSI-Libby-01 (EPA 2000).

Upon receipt at the lab, samples were unpacked from the cooler, checked against theCOC for inclusion and transferred to a freezer for temporary storage. Whenprocessed, samples were transferred to labeled, tared, drying pans and weighed inbatches of twenty samples. The weight of each sample was recorded on a samplepreparation sheet and the samples were transferred to a Gilson Model TLC dryingoven and dried at 60 degrees Celsius. The samples and drying pans were wrapped ina sheet of cheese cloth to eliminate the potential of cross contamination in the dryingoven. The sample weights were recorded throughout the drying period until a stablemass was reached, as indicated by a minimum of two mass readings within 2 percenttaken approximately an hour apart.

After drying, samples were passed through a 3/8" sieve. The mass of the materialretained on the sieve was recorded and then discarded. The mass of the material thatpassed through the sieve was recorded and the material was passed through a half-inch stainless steel riffle-type sample splitter. Each sample was split into four portionsand each portion was placed in a labeled re-sealable quart-size plastic bag.

All sample preparation equipment, including the drying pans, sieves and samplesplitters, was decontaminated after use with detergent wash and de-ionized rinsewater. All sample preparation activities that included sample transfer or aggressivedesegregation were performed in a fume hood equipped with a high-efficiencyparticulate air filter.


RA Report - Former Vermiculite of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 4-107/2001

Section 4Field and Analytical Results

4.1.2 Soil and Waste/Product Analytical Results

Soil samples were sent to Reservoirs Environmental Services, Inc., (Reservoirs) forasbestos analysis after processing by CDM's Laboratory. Bulk samples ofwaste/product were also sent to Reservoirs. Polarized light microscopy (PLM) byNational Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Method 9002 wasspecified for all soil and bulk samples.

Table 4-1 identifies the sample index identification, sample identification code, sampletype, sample location, asbestos concentration, and type of asbestos for all soil andbulk samples. Figure 4-1 presents the sample results at their respective location on thesite. Of the fifteen soil samples, eight contain a trace amount (less than 1 percent byvisual estimate) of tremolite/actinolite asbestos. Of these eight samples, five samplesalso contain chrysotile asbestos ranging from trace up to 2 percent (Sample PA2-00093). These five samples were collected from the northern face of the eastern annexto Building 4 and at the northern perimeter of the site. The remaining ten soil sampleswere collected from unpaved areas east of Building 1, along the northern andsouthern perimeter of the site, and outside the western wall of Building 4.

The two product samples (Samples PA2-00112 and PA2-00113) contain a trace level oftremolite/actinolite asbestos. Sample PA2-00113 also contains 11 percent chrysotileasbestos.

Sample PA2-00094 and its duplicate PA2-00095 each contain a trace amount oftremolite/actinolite asbesto and a trace amount (PA2-00095) up to 1 percent (PA2-00094) chrysotile asbestos.

4.1.3 Data Quality Assessment

Section 3 of the SAP outlines data quality objectives for this project. Table 4-4 presentsan assessment of data quality as it pertains to soil samples.

Tie objective of soil and bulk sampling for this RA was to determine whether any soiland/or product at the site is an ACM as defined by National Emission Standards forHazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) (i.e., a substance with greater than 1 percentasbestos content) and/or contains any amphibole asbestos (tremolite/actinolite)associated with vermiculite mined from Libby, Montana.

The data quality assessment indicates two soil samples (PA2-00093 and PA2-00094)and one product sample (PA2-00113) are ACMs. The EPA will need to evaluate what,if any, removal action is warranted for identified ACMs.


RA Report - Former Vermiculite of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 4-207/2001


For conditions when low concentrations of asbestos are detected in soils, such as thosereported between Samples PA2-00064 and PA2-00065, the PLM method is subject todisparity between samples. The EPA will need to evaluate if these and other tracelevel soils will require additional verification analysis, possible via an electrontechnique such as Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) or Scanning ElectronMicroscopy (SEM) and/or if additional sampling is warranted.

4.2 Microvacuum Dust Results

4.2.1 Sample Results

Reservoirs analyzed the microvacuum dust samples. The samples were analyzed byInternational Standard Organization (ISO) Method 10312. ISO Method 10312 is a TEMmethod that determines the types of asbestos fibers present, as well as the lengths,widths, and aspect ratios of the asbestos structures.

Table 4-2 identifies the index identification number, the sample identification code,sample locations and analytical results for each of the microvacuum samples. TheCOC records and laboratory reports are presented in Appendices C and F,respectively. Three of the dust samples (Samples PA2-00106 through PA2-00108)contained both tremolite/actinolite and chrysotile asbestos structures indicating thatasbestos fibers were at one time airborne in Buildings 2,3 and 4. Total asbestosconcentrations ranged from 81,676 s/cm2 (Sample PA2-00106) up to 147,400,000 s/cm2

(PA2-00108). In Sample PA2-00105 that had an asbestos concentration of 714,667s/cm2, only chrysotile asbestos structures were detected. No asbestos were detected inthe field blanks (analytical sensitivity: < 32 s/cm2).


Section 3 of the SAP outlines data quality objectives for this project. Table 4-5 presentsan assessment of data quality as it pertains to microvacuum dust samples.

The objective of microvacuum dust sampling for this RA was to determine1 whetherasbestos was present in dust that may indicate past occurrences of airborne asbestos.The data quality assessment indicates that amphibole asbestos (tremolite/actinolite)was at one time in the past airborne in Buildings 2,3, and 4 and that chrysotileasbestos was airborne in all four site buildings. The results of the field blanks indicatethat contamination did not occur during sample handling, shipping, and preparation.


RA Report - Farmer VermicuIKe of Hawaii. Honolulu, HI 4-307/2001


4.3 Ambient Air Results

4.3.1 Sample Results

Reservoirs analyzed the ambient air samples by ISO Method 10312. ISO Method 10312is a TEM method that determines the types of asbestos fibers present, as well as thelengths, widths, and aspect ratios of the asbestos structures.

Table 4-3 identifies the sample index identification number, sample identificationcode, sample type, sample location, number of structures detected, type of asbestos,and asbestos concentration for each of the air samples. The COC records andlaboratory reports are presented in Appendices C and F, respectively. No asbestosstructures were detected in any of the four ambient air samples collected or in the twofield blanks. The results of the field blanks indicate that contamination did not occurduring sample handling, shipping, and preparation (analytical sensitivity: <0.0010s/cc).


Section 3 of the SAP outlines data quality objectives for this project. Table 4-6 presentsan assessment of data quality as it pertains to ambient air samples.

The objective of the air sampling for this RA was to determine whether airborneasbestos fibers are present at the site that could pose a hazard to anyone on or nearthe site. Results of ambient air sample analysis indicate that no asbestos structureswere detected in either the ambient air samples or in the field blanks. Nocontamination occurred during sample handling, shipping, and preparation based onthe field blank results.

4.4 Asbestos-Containing Materials Survey

PES conducted an ACM survey during the site walkover. Appendix G presents resultsof this survey and the Suspect ACM Checklist. Survey results are summarized below.

4.4.1 Vermiculite Insulation

Processed vermiculite was identified on some of the walls in Building 4. In addition,raw vermiculite ore was identified outside of Building 4. Samples of these materialswere collected and analyzed. Samples of these materials were found to contain a traceof tremolite/actinolite asbestos (see Section 4.1).


RA Report - Former Vermiculite of Hawaii. Honolulu, HI07/2001


4.4.2 Other Suspect Asbestos-Containing Materials

PES also identified materials that are considered to be potential or suspect ACMduring the walkthrough of each building. The survey was performed to identify othersources of asbestos fibers that could be present in the on-site buildings. PES did notcollect any samples of suspect ACMs that were identified. The suspect ACMs aresummarized in Table 4-7. The Suspect ACM Checklist used to collect the surveyinformation is presented in Appendix G.

4.5 Historic Sample Results

No historic sample results were available for review at this site. The property ownerwas not aware if any historic data exists.


RA Report - Former VermicuHte of Hawaii. Honolulu, HI 4-507/2001


Table 4-1Results of Soil Sample Analysis

Hawaii Staging & Lighting/Funtastic Party Rental & Supply(Former Vermiculite of Hawaii)

Honolulu, HI

Sample IndexIdentification

Sample IdentificationCode

SampleTypeSoil Sam

PA2-00087

PA2-00088

PA2-00089

PA2-00090

PA2-00091

PA2-00092

PA2-00093

PA2-00094

PA2-00095

PA2-00096

PA2-00097

PA2-00098

PA2-00111

PA2-00114

PA2-00115

LSS-HIHO-SO-SO1-01-03

LSS-HIHO-SO-S02-01-03







LSS-DIHO-SO-SO8-01-03







Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Duplicate

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Sample Location Result Type ofAsbestos

piesEast of Building 1

East of Building 1Southern perimeter ofBuilding 3Southern perimeter ofBuilding 3Southern line of propertybetween Buildings 3 & 4Walkway propertybetween Buildings 3 & 4Northern face of easternannex to Building 4Northern face of easternannex to Building 4Duplicate of SamplePA2-00094Northern perimeter ofpropertyNorthern perimeter ofpropertyNorthern perimeter ofpropertyNorthern section ofBuilding 4Building 4: Exteriorwestern wallBuilding 4: Exteriorwestern wall

Non-detect

Trace

Non-detect

Non-detect

Non-detect

Trace

/Trace >.( 2%y%&TraceTraceTraceTraceTraceTrace

Non-detect

Non-detect

Trace

Non-detect

NA

Trem-Act

NA

NA

NA

Trem-Act

Trem-ActChrysotileTrem-ActChrysotileTrem-ActChrysotileTrem-ActChrysotileTrem-ActChrysotile

NA

NA

Trem-Act

NA

Product SamplesPA2-00112

PA2-00113

LSS-HIHO-WP-POl-01-00

LSS-HIHO-WP-P02-01-00

Product

Product

Building 4: Northern wall

Building 4: Eastern wall

TraceTrace11%

Trem-ActTrem-ActChrysotile

LEGEND: Trace = Less than 1 percent asbestos by visual estimate.NA = Not applicableNon-detect = No asbestos detected in the soil sample.Trem-Act = Tremolite/Actinolite asbestos

Note: All soil samples were analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM).

Reference: Reservoirs Environmental Services Inc. Job Number RES 76148-1 (excerpt).


RA Report • Former Vermiculite of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI07/2001

4-6


Table 4-2Results of Microvacuum Dust Sample Analysis


Honolulu, HI


PA2-00105

PA2-00106

PA2-00107

PA2-00108

PA2-00109

PA2-00110


LSS-HIHO-DU-B01-1-00




LSS-HIHO-DU-000-1-00

LSS-HIHO-DU-000-2-00

SampleType

Comp.

Comp.

Comp.

Comp.

Blank

Blank

Sample Location

Building 1: Threeseparate horizontalsurfacesBuilding 2: Threeseparate horizontalsurfacesBuilding 3: Threeseparate horizontalsurfacesBuilding 4: Threeseparate horizontalsurfaces

Blank sample

Blank sample

Number ofStructuresDetected

ND98

115

220

6456

ND

ND

Type ofAsbestos

Trem-ActChrysotile

Trem-ActChrysotile

Trem-ActChrysotile

Trem-ActChrysotile

NA

NA

AsbestosCone.(s/cm1)< 5,105714,667

5,105 ,76,571

102,0951,020,952

1,914,286147,400,000

< 32

< 32

Note: All microvacuum dust samples were analyzed by ISO Method 10312 (TEM)

LEGEND:Cone. = Concentrations/cm2 = structures per square centimeterComp.= CompositeTrem-Act = tremolite/actinolite asbestosND = No asbestos structures detected.NA = Not applicable

Reference: Reservoirs Environmental Services Inc. Job Number RES 75707.



4-7


Table 4-3Results of Ambient Air Sample Analysis

Hawaii Staging & Lighting/Funtastic Party Rental & Supply(Former Venniculite of Hawaii)

Honolulu, HI


PA2-00099

PA2-00100

PA2-00101

PA2-00102

PA2-00103

PA2-00104


LSS-HIHO-AA-BO4-1-72


LSS-HIHO-AA-B03-1-72


LSS-HIHO-AA-000-1-00

LSS-HIHO-AA-000-2-00

SampleType

Air

Air

Air

Air

Blank

Blank

Sample Location

Building 4: Centerednorth/ south and 20 feeteast of west wall.Building 2: 60 feet northof the south wall and 15feet east of west wall.Building 3: Centeredeast/ west and 5 feetnorth of south wall.Building 1: 5 feet northof kitchen corridoradjacent to thebathroom.Blank sample

Blank sample

Number ofStructuresDetected

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Type ofAsbestos

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

AsbestosCone. T-(s/cc) |

< 0.0010 _

< 0.0010

—— T< 0.0010

< 0.0010

-^-r—

Note: All air samples were analyzed by ISO Method 10312 (TEM)

LEGEND:Cone. = Concentrations/cc = structures per cubic centimeterND = No asbestos structures detected.NA = Not applicable

Reference: Reservoirs Environmental Services Inc. Job Number RES 75706.


RA Report - Former VermkxiMe of Hawaii, Honolulu. HI07/2001

4-8


Table 4-4Data Quality Assessment for Soil Samples

Hawaii Staging & Lighting/Funtastic Party Rental & Supply(Former Vermiculite of HI)

Honolulu, HI

DQO Step Project Objective Description Assessment1: Problem

StatementThe objective of the RA is to determine if the site hasbeen impacted by asbestos. Soil at the site may containasbestos and solid material and airborne asbestosfibers could present a hazard to anyone located inareas at or near the site.

This RA was conducted to assessthe problem statement.

2: Identify theDecision

Can any of the soils on the site be considered asbestos-containing materials?

Soil samples were collected andanalyzed to determine whether sitesoils have been impacted byasbestos.

3: Inputs to theDecision

A friable asbestos-containing material is defined bythe National Emission Standards for Hazardous AirPollutants (NESHAP) regulations (EPA1990), as "anymaterial containing more than 1 percent asbestos asdetermined using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM),that, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized orreduced to powder by hand pressure."_________

The soil samples were analyzed byPLM to determine theconcentration of asbestos in orderto ascertain whether site soil is anACM.

4: StudyBoundaries

Spatial boundaries for soil/product sampling werewithin site boundaries (horizontal) and fromapproximately 2 inches below ground surface (bgs) tothe top of the ceiling of any building (vertical).

All but one of the soil samples wascollected from about 1 to 3 inchesbgs. The exception occurredbeneath a grate in the warehouse.Sample PA2-00111 was collected +4 to 8 inches bgs.___________

5: DecisionRule

The objective of the decision rule was to determinewhether any soil sample had an asbestosconcentration of greater than 1 percent.

Two soil samples and one productsample had asbestos concentrationat or greater than 1 percent and aretherefore ACMs. Six other soilsamples and the other productsample contain a trace amount ofasbestos.

Limits ofDecisionErrors

Due to the semi-quantitative aspect of PLM, thedecision error limit for this project was determined tobe + 100 percent. This range of decision error allowsthe decision-maker the option to have the samplesreanalyzed, analyzed by TEM or determine that a sitehas been impacted based on professional judgment.

Due to the trace detections in sixsoil samples and one productsample, the decision maker (EPA)will evaluate if these low detectionswill require additional analysis oradditional sampling. EPA will alsoneed to evaluate what, if any,removal action is warrantedregarding ACMs.____________

Optimize theDecision forObtainingData

Identify the most resource-effective sampling designthat generates data to satisfy the DQOs in theprevious steps.

The SAP (COM Federal 2001)provided procedures for samplingand analysis to satisfy DQOs forthis project and was approved byEPA. There were no deviationsfrom SAP.


RA Report - Farmer VemniculHe of Hawaii. Honolulu, HI07/2001

4-9


Table 4-5Data Quality Assessment for Microvacuum Dust Samples


Honolulu, HI

DQO Step Project Objective Description Assessment1: Problem

StatementThe objective of the RA is to determine if the site hasbeen impacted by asbestos. Dust in buildings at thesite may contain asbestos and solid material andairborne asbestos fibers could present a hazard toanyone located in areas at or near the site.______

This RA was conducted toassess the problemstatement


Is asbestos identified in dust in on-site buildings? Microvacuum dust sampleswere collected to determinewhether dust containsasbestos.


Analysis of dust samples is to be conducted to assesswhether dust contains any asbestos.

Dust samples were analyzedby TEM ISO Method 10312 todetermine the presence ofasbestos in dust.

4: StudyBoundaries

Spatial boundaries for dust sampling include theinterior of any on-site building.

Dust samples were collectedfrom all of the on-sitebuildings.____________

5: Decision Rule The objective of the decision rule was to determinewhether any dust sample contained asbestos.

Analysis by TEM indicatedtremolite/ actinolite asbestosstructures in 3 of the 4composite samples. All 4 ofthe samples containedchrysotile structures._____

6: Limits ofDecision

Errors

There is no established action level for asbestos indust. The detection of asbestos will inform thedecision makers whether asbestos was mobile in thepast.

The detection of asbestosfibers indicates asbestos wasat one time airborne in thesite building. Total asbestosconcentrations ranged from81,676 s/cm2 up to 1.47x10"s/cm2._____________

7: Optimize theDecision forObtaining

Data

Identify the most resource-effective sampling designthat generates data to satisfy the DQOs in theprevious steps.

The SAP (COM Federal 2001)provided procedures forsampling and analysis tosatisfy DQOs for this projectand was approved by EPA.There were no deviationsfrom SAP (Section 3.3.2)regarding dust sampling.



4-10


Table 4-6Data Quality Assessment for Ambient Air Samples

Hawaii Staging & Lighting/Funtastic Party Rental & Supply(Former Venniculite of Hawaii)

Honolulu, HI

DQO Step Project Objective Assessment1: Problem

StatementThe objective of the RA is to determine if the sitehas been impacted by asbestos. Air within sitebuildings could potentially contain asbestos, andsolid material and airborne asbestos fibers couldpresent a hazard to anyone located in areas at ornear the site.

This RA was conducted toassess the problem statement


Are the ambient airborne asbestos fiber levels apossible health hazard?

Ambient air samples werecollected and analyzed todetermine whether asbestosfibers are present.______


Analysis of ambient air samples is to beconducted to determine the concentration ofasbestos in air to assess whether thoseconcentrations are above regulatory levels.

Air samples were analyzed byTEM to determineconcentration of asbestos.

4: StudyBoundaries

Spatial boundaries for air sampling were withinsite boundaries (horizontal) and from ground toapproximately six feet (vertical).

Spatial boundaries were met.All air samples were collectedfrom 5 feet above the groundsurface within the productionbuilding._____________

5: Decision Rule The objective of the decision rules was todetermine whether the asbestos concentration inair in any of the soil samples was aboveregulatory action levels.

No asbestos structures weredetected in any ambient airsamples or field blanks.Analytical sensitivity was<0.0010 s/cc._________

6: Limits ofDecision Errors

For air samples, the worst-case air samples will beused to determine if a site has been impacted byasbestos. Because human health and safety areinvolved, a decision error limit of ±50 of theaction level (0.1 fibers per cubic centimeter) for airwas established. This allows the decision-makersthe option to either have the sample furtheranalyzed or determine that a site has beenimpacted based on professional judgment_____

No asbestos structures wereidentified by TEM analysis inany air samples or field blanks.

7: Optimize theDecision forObtaining Data

Identify the most resource-effective samplingdesign that generates data to satisfy the DQOs inthe previous steps.

The SAP (COM Federal 2001)provided procedures forsampling and analysis to satisfyDQOs for this project and wasapproved by EPA. Deviationsfrom the SAP (see Section 3.4.2)did not affect the quality ofdata collected for this RA.



4-11


Table 4-7Summary of Suspect Asbestos-Containing Materials


Honolulu, HI

Suspect Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM)Building 1 - Office Building

Spray-on texture throughout the buildingCarpet adhesive in die officesBrick/mortar materialCement sheet located in the south end of the buildingFloor leveling compound throughout the buildingFloor tile and adhesive in the kitchen and east of the kitchenHardboard throughout the buildingLay-in ceiling panels throughout the buildingFinished wall plasterBase and finish ceiling plaster in the south end of the buildingPlaster patch compound in the officesRoof sealant/tar on the roofSuspect paint throughout the buildingBuilding 2Brick/mortar material

Building3Brick/mortar materialBoard material

Building 4Brick/mortar materialVermiculite stuck to the walls


RA Report • Former Vermiculite of Hawaii. Honolulu, HI07/2001

4-12

r~

PAVED BU1L

— • PA2-00098

-«asg^SS." "I

1LAWN «PAS-00087 ,

ND 11

PAS-00068TR <TA)

DING1

————————————— j

1ND !

i

—

- • PA2-00097TR <TA>TR

-

COPAVED

|

• PAS-00096

_J ——

BUILDING2

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

II1

j |

BUILDING3

ND

•— 1-PA2-00090I ND

TR (TA) — ——— " —— ~ — —————————TR <C>

PAVED

rrr i_i ——————

LEGENDr1

PAS-00087

r

PAS-00092 11 t\ \\ fiy W W —"

PAS-00093

T«C— UUU71

ITR <TA> • '2% <C) ^-- ——— PA2-00094 TR <TA>, IX <C>

*r"^ PAPAS-00113 *

TR <TA>11X <C)

*PA2ND°1U BUILDING+PA2-OOU2

TO (TA)

PAS-00115ND

MAPUNAPUNA STREET

PROPERTY BOUNDARY

PRODUCT SAMPLE LOCATION

SOD. SAMPLE LOCATIONSAMPLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBERRESULTS.

ND NON-DETECTTR TRACE (LESS THAN IX)(C> CHRYSOTJLE ASBESTOS

(TA) TREMOLJTE/ACTWOLITE ASBESTOS

SAMPLES ANALYZED BY POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY (PLM)

PAS-00114TR <TA>

2-00095 <DUP.)TRI

I

I

I

I_|

<TA>, TR <C)

NOT TO SCALE

SOIL SAMPLE RESULTSHQURE4-1

FOCUSED REMOVAL ASSESSMENT REPORTFORMER VERMJCUUTE OF HAWAfl, HONOLULU, HAWAII

>QO%Bk u*. ocrumatr OF HUMNHTATBN«• •& natAnoi MO tntm. mafnta MWBTMTIONf!KJ9K J*" *• MUC lUtBHM. HUMmTATiM (TIlDa CtMm

%»yf^f^fM%»MH Menl Frocnmi Cocponttn

MTt 7/2001Fll£ NO.: 014.4-100 NO.: 2603-014

4-13

PA2-0010S< 5405 S/CM8 <TA)714,667 S/CM8 <C>714,667 S/CMeTOTAL

PAS-001065,105 S/CM* <TA>

76,571 S/CM8 <C>81,676 S/CM2 TOTAL

PAS-00108 .1,914,286 S/CM8 <TA>

147,400,000 S/CM8 <C)PAS-00107 _

103,095 S/CM8 <TA)1,030,952 S/CM8 <C>

149,314,386 S/CM2 TOT 33,047 S/CMe

MAPUNAPUNA STREET

LEQEND

- — —— PROPERTY BOUNDARY

Bo COMPONENTS OFMICROVACUUM DUST COMPOSITE SAMPLE

PAS-00106 SAMPLE DENTFICATION NUMBERRESULTSi

<C> CHRYSOTLE ASBESTOS<TA> TREMOLITE/ACTMOLITE ASBESTOS

S/CM8 STRUCTURES PER SQUARE CENTIMETER

SAMPLES ANALYZED BY TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY (TEM)

4-14

NOT TO SCALEMICROVACUUM DUST SAMPLE RESULTS

FIGURE 4-2FOCUSED REMOVAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

FORMER VERMKUUTE OF HAWAII. HONOLULU, HAWAII

jom «. vout MTMW. nuMpantnai imcui com

Federal Pnfnmi CoiponUoB

Wrt: 7/200)Fll£ NO.: Ol 4.4-2DO NO.: 2603-OU

7TTT711111111

PAVED

LAWN

BUILDING1

PAS-00102< 0.0010 S/CC

PAVED

PA2-00100 X< 0.0010 S/CC

BUILDING2

X PA2-00101< 0.0010 S/CCBUILDING

3

PAVED

BUILDING4

PAa-00099< 0.0010 S/CC

MAPUNAPUNA STREET

LEGEND

—— — — —— PROPERTY BOUNDARY

X AMBENT AIR SAMPLE LOCATIONFAa-ooooa SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER

S/CC STRUCTURES PER CUBIC CENTIMETER

SAMPLES ANALYZED BY TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY ITEM)

4-15

NOT TO SCALE

AMBIENT AIR SAMPLE RESULTSFIGURE 4-3

FOCUSED REMOVAL ASSESSMENT REPORTFORMER VERMKMJTE OF HAWAII, HONOLULU, HAWAII

uj. MnumeMT or nmum MO wean.nUMNHTATBN

jam A. wuv MATCH*. nuMr«TATm nrnut CENTO

Federal Prafranu CarponUooM1E: 7/2001FU NO.: OM_<-3DO HO.: 2603-014


This page was intentionally blank.


RA Report-Former Vermicul»e of Hawaii. Honolulu. HI 4-1607/2001

Section 5Summary of FindingsThe objectives of this RA were (1) to determine if any potential sources oftremolite/actinolite asbestos are present at the site that appears to be associated withLibby ore or vermiculite; and (2) to determine whether any potential sources(vermiculite product, ore, waste, etc.) had been transported off-site either for disposal,private use by employees, or direct sale to the public. Potential sources wereinvestigated by sampling various media (soil, waste/product, ambient air, and dustinside buildings); gathering and verifying current and historical information on thesite; and documenting any observed evidence of vermiculite product or waste.Fieldwork included a facility tour, interviews with site contacts/employees, andsampling of soil, dust, and ambient air.

Hawaii Staging & Lighting/Funtastic Party Rental is the current tenant of the site.Little history is known about Vermiculite of Hawaii who was by some unconfirmedaccounts, the previous tenant. The age of the on-site buildings is unknown, althoughthe discovery of vermiculite around and inside one of the structures suggests that it isat least twenty years old. The premises are currently used by Hawaii Staging &Lighting for storage and operations.

Sampling activities were conducted to assess whether site soil, suspect vermiculiteproduct, dust, and ambient air contain tremolite/actinolite asbestos. Results ofsampling and analysis activities are as follows:

• Soil Sampling: Fifteen grab soil samples (including one duplicate) werecollected from unpaved portions of the site. CDM's laboratory in Denver,Colorado processed (i.e., dried, homogenized, and split) the soil samples prior toshipment to Reservoirs for analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM).

Samples PA2-00093 and PA2-00094 of the 15 soil samples analyzed contain onepercent or greater asbestos and are therefore classified as ACMs by the NationalEmission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP). Both samples werecollected from the northern face of the eastern annex to Building 4. Six other soilsamples (including the duplicate) contain a trace amount (less than 1 percent byvisual estimate) of tremolite/actinolite asbestos. These samples represent soilareas east of Building 1, along the northern border of the site, and outside theeastern wall of Building 4. The decision maker (EPA) will need to evaluate what,if any, removal action activities will be required in areas where ACMs wereidentified. Additionally EPA will need to evaluate if the low levels (trace) foundin the soil samples will require additional verification, possibly via an electrontechnique such as Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) or Scanning ElectronMicroscopy (SEM) and/or if additional sampling is warranted.


RA Report - Former Vermiculite of Hawaii, Honolulu. HI 5-107/2001

Sect/on 5Summary of Findings

Product Sampling: Two vermiculite product samples were collected fromprocessed vermiculite found in Building 4 (Sample PA2-00112) and from the rawvermiculite ore along the exterior, eastern wall of Building 4 (Sample PA2-00013).The two samples contain a trace level of tremolite/actinolite asbestos and SamplePA2-00113 also contains 11 percent chrysotile asbestos and is thereforeconsidered an ACM by NESHAP.

The decision maker (EPA) will need to evaluate what, if any, removal actionactivities will be required for the ACM identified. Additionally theEPA will need to evaluate if the low levels (trace) found in other productsample will require additional verification, possibly via an electron techniquesuch as Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) or Scanning ElectronMicroscopy (SEM) and/or if additional sampling is warranted.

Microvacuum Dust Sampling: Four microvacuum dust samples were collectedfrom the four on-site buildings. Three of the dust samples contained bothtremolite/actinolite and chrysotile asbestos structures indicating that asbestosfibers were at one time airborne in Buildings 2,3 and 4. The fourth samplecontained chrysotile structures. No asbestos structures were detected in the fieldblanks (analytical sensitivity: < 32 s/cm2).

Ambient Air Sampling: Four ambient air samples were collected from withinthe on-site buildings. No asbestos structures were detected in the four ambientair samples or in the field blanks. Analytical sensitivity was <0.0010 s/cc.


RA Report -FornierVannieulile of Hawaii. Honolulu, HI 5-207/2001

Section 6ReferencesCDM Federal Programs 2001, Revision 1 Sampling and Analysis Plan for Libby SisterSites (Asbestos Project) - Emergency Response and Preliminary Assessment Support/EPA Region 9. February.

Environmental Data Resources 2001. EDR-Radius Map with GeoCheck® forVermiculite of HI, 342-A Mapunapuna Street, Honolulu, HI 96818. Inquiry Number0591376. February.

Western Regional Climate Center (WRCC). 2001 .Arizona Climate Summaries:Phoenix. Web site: http://wrvvrw.wrcc.dri.edu/surnmary/climsmaz.html

United States Geological Survey (USGS). 1978. Topographic Map - GlendaleQuadrangle. Website: http://www.topozone.com

United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2000. Sampling and QualityAssurance Project Plan, Revision 1, for Libby, Montana, Environmental Monitoringfor Asbestos, Baseline Monitoring for Source Area and Residential Exposure toTremolite-Actinolite Asbestos Fibers. January 4. Appendix 13 contains procedure ISSI-Libby-01.


RA Report-Former Venniculite of Hawaii, Honolulu. HI 6-107/2001

APPENDIX ACopy of Field Logbook and Site Notes

• CDM Federal Programs Corporation (CDM Federal)

• Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES)

• U.S. Department of TransportationJohn A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center(Volpe)

DOT Volpe CenterCDM Federal Programs CorporationRA Report - Former Vermiculite of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI06/2001

COM Federal Field Logbook

(Refer to Field Sample Data Sheets in Appendix B)

DOT Volpe CenterCDM Federal Programs CorporationRA Report - Former Vermiculite of Hawaii. Honolulu. HI06/22W1

PES Field Logbook

DOT Volpe CenterCOM Federal Programs CorporationRA Report • Former Vermiculite of Hawaii. Honolulu, HI06/22/01

r>y OQ>

ft Oj.'/**'IMS?* J/Clil n 7T975T - 2

^f-^nSW/

-yv •// OPf

t*7/

Opi L

f? S vi

:?rz7

. ) >f* f————.-,—•/ Y'/S-T/^ ys--/. . S/v (?//'> 7/ / ' S 'V-'AV -'*'*OrOOP/ £?

"•'v/ /••> r*->

P f -ywri/

/* / //

I—l-.-^t^-'.-jvif^---' FEW •••

Volpe Site Notes

DOT Volpe CenterCOM Federal Programs CorporationRA Report - Former Vermiculite of Hawaii, Honolulu. HI06/22/01

Site Visit Requirements

Tour SiteMeetPOCTour siteInterviewDigital PhotographsDiscussion/Meeting of findings

Sampling DataMedia Budgeted # Samples / SiteAir 5 4000 liters in -7-8 hrsDust 3Soil 15Waste 2

Digital Photographs - CDM

Historical Information on Vermiculite ShipmentsGrace (Phoenix) & Therm-O-Rock (Chandler)

Information on Current use of Site

Current and Historical Site Plans

Document existence of Potential Asbestos Contaminated Materials (PACMs)Via checklist (e.g. Libby)

Interview Site Personnel

Questions (for former Grace Sites)1. Have any asbestos surveys, monitoring, and/or sampling been conducted in the past? If yes, could we

get copies of the reports?2. What was the condition of the site when the property was taken over from Grace?3. Are the buildings present on the site original (i.e. around during Grace's ownership)?4. Were there and are there any visible vermiculite/waste piles left from Grace? If yes, where and how

were they cleaned up (if they were)?5. Are there any bags of vermiculite or equipment still present on site from Grace? If yes where?6. Did Grace require any waivers of liability in regards to the transfer of the property?7. Are there known ACMs onsite? If yes where?8. Are any of the buildings more than 20 years old?9. What are the maintenance/ housekeeping practices?10. What kind HVAC system is present (within each building)?11. Changes in adjacent land use (commercial to residential...)12. Vermiculite use onsite?13. Documents of shipments - waste & product

3/1/01

Location: Hawaii Staging & Lighting/Funtastic Party Rental & Supply842A Mapunapuna StHonolulu, HA 96819Tel. 808-840-1900

Contacts: Craig Maddocks Bill Murray, OHST842 Mapunapuna St Masa Fuloioka & AssociatesHonolulu, ffl 96819 99-1205 Halawa Valley Street, Suite 302Tel: 808-840-1900 Aiea, HI 96701-3281

808-282-5366

Time: 9am

Representing: Hedy Ficklin, OSCPaul Kudarauskas, Volpe CenterDave Michailof, CDMGreg Parana, PESBill Murray, Masa Fujioka for Property Owner

• 4 buildings on site• Building 1 - Cement Block construction; used for offices; Central HVAC system• Building 2 - Cement block construction; used for storage rooms and toy storage• Building 3-2 sheet metal sides and 2 concrete block sides; used for storage; car port

attached, trucks stored underneath - -• Building 4-3.5 sides of cement block construction; .5 side chain linked gate; used to

store staging• Soil along edges of property and in front of office.

• Met with Bill Murray• Walked site• During walkthrough, no visible vermiculite noticed.• Age of building 4 seemed fairly new• According to knowledgeable sources, there is only hearsay of Vermiculite of HI

being there. No one interviewed (including neighboring businesses) knew anyinformation of Vermiculite of Hawaii. However 4 people were very knowledgeableof vermiculite (mica type of mineral when heated expands; used in soil)

Sampling• 4 ambient air samples - one in each building• Four micro vacs• 14 soil samples• 3 air sample started @ 9:15 and 1 @ 9:50. Need ~8 hours to obtain 4000 liters. The

area closes at 5pm. 4000 liters cannot be obtained. OSC aware and accepted.

• ~2pm while micro vaccing in building 4, vermiculite was found pressed against northwall behind staging. The vermiculite was the processed kind. After this finding, re-walked the building and found the same material pressed against the concrete walls inrandom patches on concrete walls. Sample taken from each patch..

• Exterior of West wall accessible by vehicle. Examined the area between the road andoutside of west wall. Found vermiculite ore in grassy area. Seemed more like 100%vermiculite ore and no actual soil. Samples taken.

• Called Murray to offer splits. Could not get through. Left message. (3/2 - Murraycalled and walked site. Did not request splits)

• Ended air sampling at 5pm. Approx. Vol ~ 36001iters

Questionnaire1 - Unknown2 - Grace was not a prior tenant3-N/A4 - There was vermiculite about ground level with grass growing in it on the West side ofproperty. There was also processed vermiculite pressed against the inner walls ofBuilding 4 in random spots. Size varying from 3 square inches to 2 square feet. Thisproduct was left from Vermiculite of HI, not Grace.5-No6-N/A7-No8 - Unknown, but assumed when looking at Bldgs 1-3.- Bldg 4 looks newer, howeverafter finding the vermiculite pressed against the walls and the knowledge of Vermiculiteof HI being present in the 70's, then yes.9 - Basic sweeping. In office dusting & sweeping10 - Bldg 1, Central HVAC; Bldg 2-4, no HVAC present.11 - Just changes in business type12-No13 - None by property representative. Government does have evidence of 2 shipments ofvermiculite.

This page intentionally left blank.

RA Report - Former Veimiculite erf Hawal, Honolulu, HI

I

2/28/01

Location: Hawaii Staging & Lighting/Funtastic Party Rental & Supply842 A Maunaputa RoadHonolulu, HI 96819

Contact: Craig Maddocks842 Mapunapuna StHonolulu, HI 96819Tel: 808-840-1900

Time: 2pm

Representing: Paul Kudarauskas, Volpe CenterDave Michailof, CDMGreg Parana, PES

Drove to sight to confirm directionsSpoke with Craig Maddocks (business owner). He gave permission to walk through siteWalked site, saw no visible signs of vermiculite.

APPENDIX BField Sample Data Sheets

• Air

• Dust

• Soil

• Wast^Product

DOT Volpe CenterCOM Federal Programs CorporationRA Report - Former VermicuMe of Hawaii, Honolulu. HI06/22/01

Address or Location ID:

Sheet No: A-_/ _LIBBY MONTANA SITE INVESTIGA TIONFIELD SAMPLE DA TA SHEET FOR

AIRGPS (if no address available): Northirlg ' . EastingOwner ^r*'*} /*2kJJ&GefCS. . . .

Land Use Cateeorv: Residential School Commercial Minina Other ( )

Site Visit Date: &l/M/Gt *3A"A" Sampling Team: p£5. 6p.

Data Item

Field ID Number

Index ID

Category (circle)

Matrix Type (circle)

Location Description

Flow" Meter" Type

Flow Meter ID No.

Pump ID Number .

Start-Date .

Start-Time

Start-Flow (L/min)

Start-Counter

Stop-Date

Stop-Time

Stop-Flow (L/min)

Stop-Counter

Pump fault?

MET Station onsite?

Field Comments

Cassette 1l35-AXH6-AA~£6i- /- 7J[

M* -060-9 1

RepBlanks .'B*M»opf) h*s*«f,c

"7 "'"&&*»*&/-

6£n<r r^^9, /

: ' . ^ j/^ '/oyLX ^ y c / / & /* 9 .

i/S i On

/U//1* &*^JQjJt)J

:

A/JA(NO.J Yes |

^No^ Yes

flj <S *^^ i 0 ^^ *^

Cassette 2LSS-HTHQ -Aft- &03 -"/ - 7 5

/%?- oo/ooRepBlank •

midoor./ . <,Outdoor2 &IA i i&f f**{ (^J tv<?3T

f/ &~

fcJontirs&\ j-if / ^^ 9\_ j ^y^ i 3 f

/a%%AAforffo* ^ Cl

&,6>Af//*

r^ ,^ ~ I0*}*''}01

ho 6%>(*

_ ^j*s*^\

No j Yes

^NO Yes

.SSSOJL

Cassette 3l*S.'*TH6-AA-**3'rtA

f/l<2-O6fO /

RepBlank

Indoor^)OuidoorI^U^^ ^^

"tfJom-feSA3 1^1$11. 6,

C>*l<***/ot64 3GX, L

A//JAi /°'/0//O/

&e*l /<5- *? JO /f *

J?,/

/s/rtNo^ Yes

^NSj Yes

Jw^^^n

Address or Location ID: ? i)3L A

Sheet No: A-LIBBY MONTANA SITE INVESTIGA TIONFIELD SAMPLE DA TA SHEET FOR

AIR" *******

GPS (if no address available): NorthiniOwner

Easting

Land Use Category: Residential SchooK CommercialJ Mining Other (_

> li^ /Site Visit Date: Sampling Team:

Data Item Cassette 1 Cassette 2 Cassette 3Field ID Number L&FIHO -AA -oc-i- coIndex ID

Category (circle)

Blank


Location Description /./v- (i)A / A

FTow Meter Type

Flow Meter ID No.

Pump ID Number

Start-Date . ^wy1Start-Time

Start-Flow (L/min)

Start-Counter

Stop-Date -t-fj,Stop-Time

Stop-Flow (L/min)

Stop-Counter

Pump fault? No. Yes No No

MET Station onsite? Yes No No

Field Comments

-V

Sheet No: D- ... /UBBY MONTANA SITE INVESTIGATION

FIELD SAMPLE DATA SHEET FORDUST

Address or Location ID:GPS (if no address available): NorthingOwner

tftEasting

Land Use Category:,

Date:Sampling Team:,

t //> /

zhooKCommercial

Data Item Cassette 1 Cassette 2 Cassette 3Field ID Number ~i -C O

Index ID

Category (circle)Blank Blank Blank

LocationDescription it>C( Tti*>TC

Sample area (cm2) 300Flow Meter Type ti

Flow Meter IDNumberPump ID NumberStart-Flow (t/min)Start-TimeStop-Flow (L/min)

Stop-Tim^ 1311Pump fault? Ho) Yes Yes Yes

Field Comments

Sheet No: D~ ..3-LIBBY MONTANA SITE INVESTIGATION

FIELD SAMPLE DATA SHEET FORDUST

Address or Location ID:_GPS (if no address available): NorthinjOwner: fv<M< /*?£*$/*/pe.Jte<^Land Use Category; ftesidentie

Easting

Date: nSampling Team:,

lo /

Data ftero Cassette 1 Cassette 2 Cassette 3

Field ID Number /-OC

Index ID

Category (circle) FS

LocationDescriptionSample area (cm3) 300Flow Meter TypeFlow Meter IDNumberPump ID NumberStart-Flow (L/mitt)Start-TimeStop-Flow (L/min)Stop-Timf /3V/Pump fault? Yes ! No Yes

Field Comments Vtfib ic,/A/

Sheet No: S-LIBBY SISTER SITES-PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT

FIELD SAMPLE DATA SHEET FORSOIL

Address or Location ID:_VGPS: Northing_______ Easting:

Land Use Category: Residential School Commercial Mining Future ResidentialCommercial Logging Roadway

Sample Date: *Vl /o\ Sampling Team: a>*\

Data Item

Field ID Number

Index ID

Sample Time


Category (circle)

Type (circle) (

Top Depth (in.)

Bottom Depth (in.)

Map Location(s)(Indicate on field sketch)

Comments

Sample 1

<>$-ttiVt''&M'&

W^-OOCK1

1OC&

3rard SoiT^Garden SoilPlay AreaDrivewayMining WasteOther( )

S>FD

^ <Comp

# subsamples1

S

?7

Sample 2

LJ$-ttMO-&~&3£l'

PH.-oao*-<r

J O J O

Garden SoilPlay AreaDrivewayMining WasteOther ( )

fSPFD

*grjE>Comp

it subsamples

J

S

*f

Sample3

LS$>-tHlto-so-%>,Z£i

P^-cxx*?")

/6^>

Yard SoilGarden SoilPlay AreaDrivewayMining WasteOther ( )

ED

Comp# subsamples

1

3^

Sheet No: S-JL.LIBBY SISTER SITES-PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT


Address or Location ID: » °^*GPS: NorthingOwner: fa>*tt&n(_ PVd-xLand Use Category: Residential

•MO-XCK^ <d V\Easting:

fas*3*JL±

School Commercial MCommercial Loeeine Roadwav ti

Sample Date: 3/ o\/o\> Sampling Team:

i

inine Future Residential5thei> f <2«Mc f» . }

CO^A. MTLIWV^'

Data Item

Field ID Number

Index ID

Sample Time


Category (circle)

Type (circle)

Top Depth (in.)

Bottom Depth (in.)


Comments

Sample 1

L£6-UlM"to*&i~&-0'd>

ptr^-oas'S.o

ic*oYard SoilGarden SoilPlay AreaDrivewayMining WasteOther( )

aFD

Comp# subsamples

\

y

Av

Sample 2

t$$-*iiMo-$e-505;fl_;

tf>ft-^~CX>CCH V

/o*£d_3Yard SoilGarden SoilPlay AreaDrivewayMining WasteOther ( )

3^

# subsamples\

3' °\i

Sample 3

L&-Hiric-$£>-$Cb-£('

A^rocaq^

/o*P


Cg>FD

Oorop# subsamples

r—— 3 ————

41

Sheet No: S-LIBBY SISTER SITES-PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT


Address or Location ID:GPS: Northing_____Owner:

)-\ VEasting:

Land Use Category: Residential School Commercial Mining Future ResidentialCommercial Logging Roadway ^Qtheh (_

Sample Date: ^/o\ As)___________ Sampling Team:_(__________

Data Item

Field ID Number

Index ID

Sample Time


Category (circle)

Type (circle)

Top Depth (in.)

Bottom Depth (in.)


Comments

Sample 1

l#>-KWO-£-50-7-«>l-«2

P*£L-ooo0\^

|Mt«7

! ^Tard SoilGarden SoilPlay AreaDrivewayMining WasteOtherr )

FD

Comp# subsamples

I->

°n.

Sample 2

&S-HUJO-*- 5«f-*"^(pf^-oco^ q

l(?6cP

Yard SoilGarden SpilPlay AreaDrivewayMining WasteOther ( )

FD

# subsamples

\

3.11

Sample 3i&,~s\M-ji)^&<x-(

p^^rocx>«tT

IO&0


@> OooW(GVJ>Comp

# subsamples

/

~1 ——————————

f l f /«

Owp ^ ^f

Sheet No: S- iiLIBBY SISTER SITES-PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT >~


Address or Location ID: VGPS: NorthingOwner:

<"S H *Easting:

Land Use Category: Residential School Commercial Mining Future ResidentialCommercial Logging Roadway <0tnei)(<2a^*r<>^ CL» )

Sample Date:^/->l /g\ _________ Sampling Team:

Data Item

Field ID Number

Index ID

Sample Time


Category (circle)

Type (circle)

Top Depth (in.)

Bottom Depth (in.)


Comments

Sample 1

•£S-frU6-£>-3fl*'^

PFUX-OOOT4

rots

Yard SoilGarden SoilPlay Area^DrivewayMining WasteOther ( )

&FD

<^ra£)Comp

# subsamples

/

3>

?4

Sample 2

L*>6-M-IHO^.^-

<pba-ooocO

A?v5^


FS>FD

Comp# subsamples

/J^

?7

Sample 3

L5S> -VltfC-iC£tC:±

<2fc^-<x>=>S£-

//OJT<&>Yard SoilGarden SoilPlay AreaDrivewayMining WasteOther ( )

JF$5FD

^^§Comp

# subsamples

/^

^ fv

Sheet No: S- f)LIBBY SISTER SITES-PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT


Address or Location ID: \Jq*>*>c«-'V.GPS: Northing____________Owner:

Easting:_

Land Use Category: Residential School Commercial Mining Future ResidentialCommercial Logging Roadway COthen (

Sample Date:_ Sampling Teiirft^yfc

Data Item

Field ID Number

Index ID

Sample Time


Category (circle)

Type (circle)

Top Depth (in.)

Bottom Depth (in.)


Comments

Sample 1

(-5S -HI no ~5P "6n -^ •<MA OPII,

/itsYard SoUGarden SoilPlay AreaDrivewayMining WasteOther( )

Comp# subsamples

"fB

///v/S>f- M^ot»^O»rC' K5£,

Sample 2

? LS^HlHo-SD-Si^

^^0,

!M5o


IS)W

Comp# subsamples

/3,

111

Sample 3

* /^ -WW-»TS5-/.

f*-~W

ifj U_$

YartSoUGarden SoilPlay AreaDrivewayMining WasteOther ( )

IPComp

it subsamples

1

.2

MS"

Sheet No: W- \j

LIBBY SISTER SITES - PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENTFIELD SAMPLE DATA SHEET FOR

WASTE/PRODUCT

Address or Location ID:_______GPS (if no address available): NorthingOwner:

Easting_- ________

Land Use Category: Residential School Commercial Mining <ptfifer (

Date:Sampling Team:

Data Item Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

Field ID Number

Index ID

Matrix Type

Category (circle)

WastProdu

FD

Waste/Product

FSFD

Description ofsampling location

Field Comments

V CZT»MCc^*- 1^

APPENDIX CChain-of-Custody Records

DOT Volpe CenterCDM Federal Programs CorporationRA Report - Former VermicuNto of Hawaii, Honolulu. HI06/22/01

I I I I I IJohn A. Volpe National Transportation Systems CenterEnvironmental Engineering Division, DTS-3355 Broadway, Kendall SquareCambridge, Massachusetts 02142

Deliver To:ne.. Kest/en /"« £r*tSi f* mi r*t t A* V- I . O/

Chain of Custody RecordAmbient Air

Field Sample ID Sample Type Sample Date Volume (L) Turn Around Time Analysis Request

tv £M t*

PA& - Al 03 Al i //jy 3*36 VA.

PA 61PA& - OS f 0161

PA A' A atti </

Reluinquished By (Signature and Company) Date/Time Received By (Signature and Company) DateHlme Condition03/01, J

IJohn A. Volpe National Transportation Systems CenterEnvironmental Engineering Division, DTS-3355 Broadway, Kendall SquareCambridge, Massachusetts 02142

Deliver To:

f/J-

Chain of Custody RecordMicrovacuum/Dust

Field Sample ID Matrix Type Sample Date Area Sampledcm2

Turn Around Time Analysis Request

0 3 6 l f l661 A £. si ? /at l/\ i 360 1 A

la i/•PA o> • a A /a fPA A - a o i o IAIPA ,-j — ff & i / 1 At 1A3 At G 1

Relulnquished By (Signature and Company) Date/Time Received By (Signature and Company) Date/Time Condition43/6 <>/£>f

APPENDIX DPhotographic Log

DOT Volpe CenterCOM Federal Programs CorporationRA Report - Former VerrnkxiMe of Hawaii, Honolulu. HI06/22/01

APPENDIX EInformation Collected During Site Interviews

No additional information is provided.

DOT Volpe CenterCDM Federal Programs CorporationRA Report - Former Vermiculite of Hawaii. Honolulu, HI06/22/01

APPENDIX FLaboratory Results

The following laboratory reports are contained herein:

• RES 76148-1• RES 75707-1• RES 75706

Analyses were performed by:

Reservoirs Environmental Services, Inc.1827 Grant StreetDenver, Colorado

DOT Volpe CenterCOM Federal Programs CorporationRA Report - Former Vermkxtte of Hawaii, Honolulu. HI06/22/01

LAB NO. 101896ASBESTOS-TEM, PC*. PLM.SEMMETALS - AA. FUME/FURNACEAIRBORNE PARTKULATESSPECIAL PARTICLE ANALYSIS

AIHA LAB I.O. 101533

RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTALSERVICES, INC.

1927 GRANT STREET DENVER. COLORADO 80203-1107 (BOO) 678-7374 (303)830-1986 FAX (303) 863-9196

Final Report RES 76148-1

June 20, 2001

CDM Federal Programs - EPA / Region 9

Table of Contents

Cover SheetLetter, including Case NarrativeTable I. Analytical ResultsChain of CustodyBench SheetsQC Bench Sheets, including Lab Blanks

Page124

1429106

ASBESTOS - TBU. PCU. PLM, SEWLAB HO 101*96 METALS - AA, FLAMBFURNACELAB NO. 101896 AttUKMHf-PAKTKULATES

SPECIAL PARTICLE ANALYSIS

AIHA LAB LO. 101533 _^—^

RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL••••M^^BMi ^HH^^^^nMHHMBHMMBaMMHHM^BHHi ^^B^^^B^^^^B^MHMMBMMBlMiHMiHBMMMHi BM^^^^^HMHM^^^^^Bl

SERVICES, INC.1S27 GRAHT STREET DENVER, COLORADO OO203-11O7 (800)679-7374 (3O3) t30-1969 FAX (303) 863-9196

April 12, 2001

Mr. Tim WallCOM Federal ProgramsOne Cambridge Place50 Hampshire StreetCambridge, MA 02139

RE: Res Job 76148-1, EPA / Region 9

Dear Mr. Wall:

Reservoirs Environmental Services, Inc. (RES, Inc.) has analyzed78 bulk material samples by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) forasbestos content as per your request. The samples were receivedon March 23, 2001, and initial results were telephoned to youroffice April 12, 2001. PLM was used to analyze the bulk materialsin compliance with guidelines established by NIOSH method 9002.The Analytical Results are presented in Table I.

Case Narrative

The samples were received on March 23, 2001 in sealed coolers.The sample sets were assigned RESI Job numbers, each sample wasassigned a unique, sequential laboratory ID number and the job waslogged into the RESI Tracker database. The laboratory ID numberswere recorded on the COM Chain of Custody and the logininformation was summarized on a RESI Chain of Custody.

The samples were transferred to the PLM laboratory for analysis.Each sample was shaken in its sample bag to homogenize it and wasthen transferred to a new polypropylene weigh boat and preparedand analyzed as prescribed in NIOSH method 9002. Sample Prepnotes are made directly onto the analytical bench sheets asneeded. The analytical results were entered into an Excelspreadsheet provided by CDM and results were forwarded to you viaE-mail. The samples were stored in the coolers after analysis.QC analyses were performed alongside the original sample analyses.

QC Summary

A total of 11 of the 78 samples were reanalyzed by a secondanalyst according to the RESI QA/QC program. All QC results werein agreement with the original analysis.

RES, Inc. has assigned job number RES 76148-1 to this study. Thisreport is considered highly confidential and the sole property ofCOM Federal Programs. RES, Inc. will not discuss any part of thisstudy with personnel other than those of the client. The resultsdescribed in this report only apply to the samples analyzed.Samples will be returned to the client after sixty days unlesslonger storage is requested. This report is not to be reproduced,except in full, without specific written approval by RESI. Thisreport must not be used to claim endorsement of products oranalytical results by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.Only the PLM microscopy results contained in this report aresubject to NVLAP accreditation, other information presented is notNVLAP accredited.

If you should have any questions about this report, please feelfree to call me at 830-1986.

Sincerely,

Jeanne S. OrrPresident

ULAnalyst(s):Brett S. ColbertPaul F. Knappe

Paul D. LoScalzoLiu Wenlong

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

hlALbbRvlutS, I'NU.NVLAP Accredited Laboratory #1896 TDH 30-0136

TABLE I. PLM BULK ANALYSIS, PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION BY VOLUME

Page | or

RES Job Number:Client:Client Project:Date Samples Received:Analysis Type:Turnaround:

RES 76148-1COM Federal Programs (CO)Libby Montana AsbestosMarch 23, 2001PLM Short Report, Bulk3-5 Day

Client Lab IDSample NumberNumber

PA2 00080 ————— EM 633111 ——

PA2 00001 —————— CM D0344D ——

PA2-00087 EM 533446

PA2-00088 EM 533447

PA2-00089 EM 533448

PA2-00090 EM 533449

PA2-00091 EM 533450

PA2-00092 EM 533451

PA2-00093 EM 533452

PA2-00094 EM 533453

PA2-00095 EM 533454

L Physical Portiona Description of Totaly Samplee (%)r

A Brown ooil ———————————————————— WQ-

A Drown aeil ———————————————————— We-

A Brown soil 100

A Brown soil 100

A Brown soil 100

A Brown soil 100

A Brown soil 100

A Brown soil 100

A Brown soil 100

A Brown soil 100

A Brown soil 100

ASBESTOS CONTENT

BY LAYER

Mineral VisualEstimate

(%)

———————————— NB-

—— Trem Act ——— W-

ND

Trem-Act TR

ND

ND

ND

Trem-Act TR

Chrysotile 2Trem-Act TR

Chrysotile 1Trem-Act TR

Chrysotile TRTrem-Act TR

Non-AsbestosFibrousComponents<%)

———— =ffi ————

———— W ————

5

5

10

8

10

6

6

6

6

Non-FibrousComponents(%)

—— tee ———— *ee ——

95

95

90

92

90

94

92

93

94

X=SND - None DetectedTR - Trace, < 1 % Visual Estimate

Trem-Act = Tremolite-ActinolitePoint Count Trace = Observed but not countable under protocol, < 0,25%

RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.NVLAP Accredited Laboratory #1896 TDH 30-0136

TABLE I. PLM BULK ANALYSIS, PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION BY VOLUME

Page 2 of


RES 76148-1COM Federal Programs (CO)Libby Montana AsbestosMarch 23, 2001PLM Short Report, Bulk3-5 Day

Client Lab IDSample NumberNumber

PA2-00096 EM 533455

PA2-00097 EM 533456

PA2-00098 EM 533457

PA2-00111 EM 533458

PA2-00112 EM 533459

PA2-00113 EM 533460

PA2-00114 EM 533461

PA2-00115 EM 533462

L Physical Portiona Description of Totaly Samplee (%)r

A Brown soil 100

A Brown soil 100

A Brown soil 100

A Brown soil 100

A Brown fibrous micaceous material 100

A Tan fibrous micaceous material 100

A Brown micaceous material 100

A Brown soil 1 00

ASBESTOS CONTENT

BY LAYER

Mineral VisualEstimate

(%)



ND

ND

Trem-Act TR

Chrysotile 1 1Trem-Act TR

Trem-Act TR

ND

Non-AsbestosFibrousComponents(%)

5

5

5

TR

15

15

TR

2

Non-FibrousComponents(%)

95

95

95

100

85

89

100

98

/£>ND = None DetectedTR = Trace, < 1 % Visual Estimate

Trem-Act = Tremolite-ActinolitePoint Count Trace = Observed but not countable under protocol, < 0.25%

RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.NVLAP Accredited Laboratory » 101896AIHA Accredited Laboratory * 101933

TABLE I. PLM BULK SAMPLE DATA AND ANALYTICAL RESULTS

RES Job Number: 71141-1CllentCOM Federal ProgramsClient ProJecfcUSEPA Llbby. AtbeiloeDale Samples Received: J/ZJ/01Analysis TyprNIOSH 1002Turnaround: 24 Hour

Inde. ID

•

PA2-00087PA2-00088PA2-00089PA2-00090PA2-00091PA2-00092PA2-00093PA2-00094PA2-0009SPA2-00096PA2-00097PA2-00098PA2-00111PA2-00112PA2-00113PA2-00114PA2-0011S

Lab ID

533446933447533446933449533490533451533452533453933454533455S33496533497533498533459533460533461933462

Appearance

Brown senBrown soHBrown solBrown jo«Brown solBrown so*Brown sonBrown to*Brown so*Brown tollBrown tollBrawn tonBrown ionBrown fibroin micaceous materialTan fibroin mlcactou* malarialBrown mlcacaous malanalBrown toll

Analytical Method

NIOSH 9002NIOSH 9002NIOSH 9002NIOSH 9002NIOSH 9002NIOSH 9002NIOSH 9002NIOSH 9002NIOSH 9002NIOSH 9002NIOSH 9002NIOSH 9002NIOSH 9002NIOSH 9002NIOSH 9002NIOSH 9002NIOSH 9002

DataRwalvad

3/23/013/23/013/23/013/23W13/23/013/23/013/23/013/23/013/23/013/23/013/23/013/23/013/23/01M3/013/23/013/23/013/23/01

DaleAnalyzed

4/2/014/2/014/2/014/2/014/2/014/2/014/2/014/2/014/2/014/2/014/2/014/2/014/2/014/2/014/2/014/2/014/2/01

Q Tr-Ac

ND<

NDNDND<

<

<

<

<

NDND<<<

ND

TramoUte-Admolne (%)

01000111111001110

0 Ch

NONONONDNDNO

<<<<

NDNDND

NDND

Chryiotlla(%)

000000211110001100

0

Type

NONDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNONDNDNDNDNDND

her AmohlDoK

Q Other

00000000000000000

a6tner

Amphiboles(%)

00000000000000000

NonAtbesloiFibrous (%)

95106106666995

TR1919TR2

Comments

—

76146-2plm.xlt:PLM 5/22/01

CHAIN OF CUSTODY

Including:RESI Job SheetUSEPA Chain of Custody Form

RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.1827 GRANT STREETDENVER. CO 8O203

Phone: (3031 •30-1986 Fai: I3O3I 863-319* WATS: 1-WO-C78-7374PAGER: ONCALL Pager avaBaMe at Lab. ANemaM Pagers: PUUVTEM SOT-2187 PCM/Metab S09-2O98 (AFTER HOURS USE ONLY!

RESI Job *:

Due Date:Due Time:

Fa«: Pager:Fax: Pager:

ASKSTOS LABORATORY HOURS: Weekday*: 7 am-7pmSaturdays: • am - S pm

Saturday Turnaround Time at tht discretion of analysts on Duty.PCM/PLM __ 2 How RUSH __24 now __3-S weekdays

Advance notice required to guarantee turnaround.Prior Notice REQUmED for TEM 6 Hour RUSH

TEM __C Hour MUSH .___24 hew __ 3-S weekdays3-8 weekday turnaround subject to. lab volume, we w*notify you If delays are expected.

Additional fees may apply for TEM analysis after laboratory hours orFLM analysis on weekends. Samples w* be analyzed owinglaboratory hours unless after-bours service Is a u t h o r i z e d . _ _ _ _ • . . • • .

METALS LABORATORY HOURS:

AA . SKOAL RUSH

RCRA8 SPECIAL RUSH

Weekdays: Sam-Spm__ 24 How _ 3-5 Oay

__ 5 Day __ 1O O«y

TCLP __ SPECIAL RUSH __ S Day __ 10 DryPrior Notice REQUIRED for SPECIAL RUSH AA. ROM or TCLP

RCRA and TCLPSPEOAL RUSH Is 3 Oay Turnaround ___

ANALYTICAL METHODAIR

BULK:

PCM 7400A. 74O06. OSHA

TEM AHERA. Level H. 7402. \l- -SEMXRO Total. RespirableAA/ICP_____ Metal ___ RCRA aOust Total. Respirable

PLM Short report. Long report. Point CountTEM +/-. Quant Semi-quantSEM +/-XRO Quartz. Other _____AA/KP___.

WATER

OTHER

EdPaku., SxMl.

TEM Drinking.AA Water ___

__MetalOust. Wipe.

Waste WaterMetal

_RCRA8TCLP

RCRA 8Drinking. Waste Water

I I Specify.

2. __3. _4.

5. _

7. _

a. __j. _10. _

•11.12. __

IX __14. _

15. _Number of i

Volume

nnitt

if substNOTE: H the package has suianalyze Incoming.samples based upon Mormi

ntial damagejr the^effaooy(Use a* many additional sheets as needed.) '•

f seal Is broken, stop and contact project manager and snipper. RESI w*.MI received witi» nose samples. HES is not responsMe tor errors or omissions in calculations

resulting from the inaccuracy of original data. Turnaround times are based upon times of receipt by Laboratory. Ca» Laboratory for number of' samples guaranteed in

Page RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.1827 GRANT STREETDENVER. CO 80203

RESI Job *:

Phone: O03J 83O-198S Fax: <3O3I W3-91M WATS: 140O«7«-73T4rAGEIC ONCAU. Paeer ava«aMe at Ub. «ftenut* Paeen: niWTEM SOS-2187 PCMMetab SOS-ZO9S (AFTER HOURS USE ONLTI

Due Date: ?.H ^>Oue Time:

mgpi

ASBESTOS LABORATORY HOURS: Weekdays: 7 am-7pmSatunJayx: 8 am - S pm

SatunJ»v Turnaround Time at the discretion of analyst* on Duty.PCM/PLM __2 Hour MUSH __ 2«neur __3-S weekdays

Advance notice required to guarantee turnaround.Prior Notice REQUIRED for TEM 6 Hour MUSH

TEM __C Hour RUSH ___24 hour __3-S weekdays3-S weekday turnaround subject to. lab volume, we wMnotify you 0 delays are expected.

Addraonel fees may apply for TEM analysis after laboratory hours orPlM analysis on weekends. Sample* wM be analyzed duringlaboratory hours unles* after-tiours service Is aumorteed. • •

METALS LABORATORY HOURS:AA SPCCtAinUSH

RCRA8 SPK3AI RUSH

Weekday*: 8am-Spm24 Heur _ 3-S Day

S Day __ 10 Pay

TCtP _ SPtdAL RUSH _ S Day _ 10 DayPrior Notice REOJLHREO for SPECIAL RUSH AA. FtCRA or TCLP

KCRA and TCUP SPECML RUSH b 3 Day Turnaround_________

ANALYTICAAIR

BULK:

WATER

OTHER

L METHOD

^

m

PpM 74OOA. 74006. . OSHA

TEM AHERA. Level N. 7402. •»•/- •SEMXRO TotaL RespirableAA/ICP Metal RCRASOust Total. RespiraM*

PLM Short report. Long report. Point CountTEM +/-. Ojuant. Sen«-quantSEM +/-XRO Quartz. OtherAA/ICP Metal RCRA8

Paint. .Sot. Oust. Wipe. TCLP

TEM Drinking. Waste WaterAA Water Metal RCRA 8

Drinking. Wane Water

Specify-

CBant Si.z.3.

s.6.7.

9.

10.

•11.

12.

13.

-Oft Ihi2L

lift (o2

15.Number of samples received:NOTE: If «<* package has sustained substj

""Jl* /— 1 LJ _/ (Use as many additiona) sheets as needed J •

tresulting from me inaccuracy of original data.

ri demeaXw Ow custody seel b broken, stop and contact project manager and snipper. RESI weV

Turnaround times are based upon times of receipt by Laboratory. Cat laboratory for number of

Daw/Time:

f I I I

Environmental Engineering Division, DTS-3355 Broadway, Kendall SquareCambridge, Massachusetts 02142

C£>,*'\ _J~ r->{. _ »*• 'V^C*c/yTjEA t

»^"7/O ''*— ' 'V*-*-' *^V ^ST"2^?!"C -c*_ Co 8o»o;j.

Chain of Custody RecordSoil/Waste/Product

Field Sample ID

PA^ -OOD s~jto- oooQZOh^-oov 9°l0&- nez.>c,0(PflipL ~ ooJ ^MAVA- <acfc> IJii-T^^-* OcXJ ^5

Pff"} ~Oet> V

PftJU Q<H<\$

DP&'&rzitfLPf^~~dc±)^?^7rQ~ 0ct> CJ^T

Ofcooli 1Pfo--0"l(l

M)-cbJ'Z

Sample Date

Vi /oi

\

*i b

Sample Type

< *S

•

&«******

Matrix Type

^c-iC

y r

fabx*

^

Turn AroundTime

.ST^D ii

f^t>

Analysis Request

PL^

f

>

Reluinquished By (Signature and Company) Date/Time Received By (Signature and Company) Date/Time Condition

^Wn

John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems CenterEnvironmental Engineering Division, DTS-3355 Broadway, Kendall SquareCambridge, Massachusetts 02142

Deliver To:

Chain of Custody RecordSoil/Waste/Product

Field Sample ID

PAZ-ootffiiiil-Q(&-~oo US'

Sample Date

Vi /*>^

Sample Type

&-**&>^

Matrix Type

So»«<I

Turn AroundTime

.$MV5yyi^1

Analysis Request

(PL^

^

Relinquished By (Signature and Company) DateATime Received By (Signal ate/Time Conditi

I 1

PLM ANALYTICAL BENCH SHEETS

ESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.VSBESTOS ANALYSIS - SHORT REPORT

DUE DATE:DUE TIME:

RES*:

EM#:

ASBESTOS FIBERS

Storage Box#:

Client Sample #: Xv

PART:A

CHRYSOTILEAMOSITECROCIDOLITETREMOLITE-ACTINOLITEANTHOPHYLLITETOTAL ASBESTOS:

NON-ASBESTOS FIBERSNON-FIBROUS CONSTITUENTS

Physical DescriptionFibr Mi Pe Gr CaCO CaSO OT

B Pibj Mi Pe Gr CaCO CaSO OTFibrS i Pe Gr CaCO CaSO OT

D Fibr Gr CaCO CaSO OTFibr Mi Pe -Qr CaCO CaSO OT

Point Count Point Count By:I

Point Count Total:

Sub-Part:Percent:

Client Sample #:

B C D

ASBESTOS FIBERSCHRYSOTILEAMOSITECROCIDOLITETREMOLITE-ACTINOLITEANTHOPHYLLITETOTAL ASBESTOS.

'ON-ASBESTOS FIBERS^ON-FIBROUS CONSTITUENTS

"ART: Physical Description:f^^&Z<^^> S9- \

HC

far

>int Count1 1 I 1

FibrFibrFibrFibrFibr

Point1 1 1

MiMiMiMiMi

PePePePePe

GrGrGrGrGr

CaCOCaCOCaCOCaCOCaCO

CaSOCaSOCaSOCaSOCaSO

OTOTOTOTOT

Count By:1 1 1

ANALYZED BY. DATE ANALYZED: ^-1*2.

Point Count Total:

BASIC SCOPE CAL:(record on first analysis form in series)

Asbestos<..'^'fvsa&f•• :• :'- .-•- .: : ; * •'•-'.:• • -. :• •' •:mmmm.

Chrysolite

Amosite

Crocidolrte

Tremolite

ActmplJte*"'"''

Anthophyllite

Color/Pleoc.Morph.

II no long1 no wavyII no straight1 noII blue straight1 blue-greyII no(green) straight1 no(green) straightII no(green) straight <1 no(green) straightII no(green) straight1 no(green) straight

R.I.Liquid

1.550

1.680

1.680

1.605

JLS05

1.605

Relief

LMH

LMH

LMH

LMH

L$H

LMH

OTHEBLEJBERS (circle type and one optical property) jc^nuiosjs3- ^

Glass(MW/FG)

Synthetics

Wollasonite

Talc

Hair

Brutite

Other

Flat, TaperedTwistingIsotropic.Curvingor StraightLong, Uniform X-section,Frayedlino straight1 noII It. green straight1 noLong Tapered or FrayedEnds, Medula, Scaleslino straight1 no

1.550

1.550

1.550

1.620

1.550

1.550

1.550

BeckeLine

(in/out mineral)IN OUTIN OUTIN OUTIN OUTIN OUTIN OUTIN OUTIN OUTIN OUTIN OUTIN OUTIN OUT

S(:K;Pi;r; W ! ' V ' ; - ? f

D.S.C.(mm, color)

540(mag)600(blu)480(gold)660(blu)480(gold)420(yell)380(pate yell)580(b. mag.)370(p. yell) f480(gold) /400(pate yell)660(blu)

Ref.Index(appx.)

nilnlnilnlnilnlnirnlnilnlniln I

Extic.(P or 1)

P

Porl

P

1

__ J-— -"

P

SignElong.(+or-)

+

+

-

+

". 4

+

Biref.(L.M.H)

L

M

L

M

7^M

Other

?

SSniW i iNote: ll=parallel, l-perpendicular s(yell)(blu)(pi. blu-yell)

(blu-yeU)(blu-white)(gld. mag)(blu-mag)(yell)blu (yell plate view)(mag)(blu)(yell)(gold)

1.57.53.52-1.70

.48-1.62

.48-2.35

.64

.62

.591.541.5511

1.594.58

Undulose

None

P

~P

P

~P

P

•i

None

(+)(-)+/-

+

-

M-H

None

LtoH

L

H

LM

L-M

iXs;•:•;--.:-;•;••.-.. TE.s^s.s;^;^^-!:1;::-.;&:.fi8P&3inChrysolite

Amosite

Crocidolrte

Tremolite

Actinolite

Anthophyllite

Color/Pleoc.Morph.

II no long1 no wavyII no straightInoII blue straight1 blue-greyII no(green) straight1 no(green) straightII no(green) straight1 no(green) straightII no(green) straight1 no(green) straight

R.I.Liquid

1.550

1.680

1.680

1.605

1.605

1.605

Relief

LMH

LMH

LMH

LMH

LMH

LMH

BeckeLine


OTHER I1BEI&: felircfc type/arid ioiie'e^eiiutese" )

Glass(MW/FG)

Synthetics

Wollasonite

Tafc

Hair

Brucite

Other

Flat, TaperedTwistingIsotropic.Curvingor StraightLong, Uniform X-section,Frayedlino straight1 noII It. green straightInoLong Tapered or FrayedEnds, Medula, ScalesIno straight

1 no

1.550

1.550

1.550

1.620

1.550

1.550

1.550

D.S.C.(mm, color)

540(mag)GOO(blu)480(gold)660(blu)480(gold)42<Xyell)380(pate yell)580(b. mag.)370(p. yell)480(goW)400(pale yell)660(blu)

Ref.Index(appx.)

n IInlnilnlnilnlniln Inilnlnilnl

Extic.(P or 1)

P

Porl

P

1

1

P

SignElong.(+or-)

+

+

-

+

+

+

Biref.(L.M.H)

L

M

L

M

M

M

Other

Note: ll=parallel. l-perpendicular K^;^: ;>!|:(yen)(blu)(pi. blu-yell)

(blu-yell)(blu-white)(gld. mag)(blu-mag)(yeB)blu (yell plate view)(mag)(blu)(yell)(gold)

1.571.531.52-1.70

1.48-1621.48-2.351.641.621.591.541.5511

1 591 58

Undulose

None

P

-P

P

-P

P

+

None

(+)(-)+/-

+

-

M-H

None

LtoH

L

H

L-M

L-M

RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.PLM ASBESTOS ANALYSIS - SHORT REPORT

RES#:

EM#:

DUE DATE:DUE TIME:

Sub-Part:Percent:

ASBESTOS FIBERS_______CHRYSOTILEAMOSITECROCIDOLITETR EMOLITE-ACTINOLITEANTHOPHYLLITETOTAL ASBESTOS:


Storage Box#:

Client Sample #:

B ? D

PART: Physical Description:Fibr Mi Pe Gr CaCO CaSO OT

B Fibr Mi Pe Gr CaCO CaSO OTFibr Mi Pe Gr CaCO CaSO OT

D Fibr Mi Pe Gr CaCO CaSO OTFibr Mi Pe Gr CaCO CaSO OT

Point Count Point Count By:

Point Count Total:

EMff:

Sub-Part:Percent:

Client Sample #:

B C D

ASBESTOS FIBERSCHRYSOTILEAMOSITECROCIDOLITETREMOLITE-ACTINOLITEANTHOPHYLLITETOTAL ASBESTOS:

<ON-ASBESTOS FIBERS'ON-FIBROUS CONSTITUENTS

0_

"AR

¥~

Physical Description:y Fibr Mi Pe Gr CaCO CaSO OT

Fibr Mi Pe Gr CaCO CaSO OTc. Fibr Mi Pe Gr CaCO CaSO OT

Fibr Mi Pe Gr CaCO CaSO OTFibr Mi Pe Gr CaCO CaSO OT

jint Count Point Count By:1

<\NALYZED BY: DATE ANALYZED:

Point Count Total:

BASIC SCOPE CAL :(record on first analysis form in series)

: Asbestos;?::-^:Bbellcf.-J'MUMChrysotite

Amosrte

Crocidol'rte

Tremolrte

ACfinolitei '

Anthophytlite

Color/Pleoc.Morph.

It no long1 no wavyII no straightno

II blue straight1 blue-greyII no(green) straight1 no(green) straightII no(green) straight <-1 no(green) straightII no(green) straight1 no(green) straight

R.I.Liquid

1.550

1.680

1.680

1.605

^606

1.605

Relief

LMH

LMH

LMH

LMH

W"LMH

BeckeLine


OTHER FIBERS (circle type and one optical property) Vc«nup

Glass(MW/FG)

Synthetics

Wollasonite

Tate

Hair

Jrucrte

Other

Flat. TaperedTwistingIsotropic.Curvingor StraightLong. Uniform X-section,Frayedlino straightI noII It. green straightI noLong Tapered or FrayedEnds, Medula, Scaleslino straightI no

1.550

1.550

1.550

1.620

1.550

1.550

1.550

D.S.C.(mm.color)

540(mag)600(blu)480(9old)660(blu)480<gold)420(yell)380(pale yell)580(b. mag.)370(p. yell) ?480(gold) /400(pale yell)660(blu)

Ref.Index(appx.)

nilnln IIn 1nilnlnilnlnil <nlnilnl

Extic.(P or 1)

P

Porl

P

'

— — — f=

P

SignElong.(+or-)

+

•f

-

+

***

+

Biref.(L,M,H)

L

M

L

M

M

M

aipH,;: IP : ; ; J Note: ll=paraltel, (-perpendicular(yell)(blu)(pi. blu-yell)

(blu-yell)(blu- white)(gld. mag)(blu-mag)(yen)blu (yell plate view)(mag)(blu)(yell)(gold)

1.571.531.52-1.70

1.48-1621.48-2351641.621.591.541.55 II

1 594.58

Undulose

None

P

~P

P

~P

P

+

None

(+)(-)+/-

+

-

M-H

None

LtoH

L

H

L-M

L-M

Other

^

Asbestos

Chrysotite

Amosrte

CrocJdolite

Tremolite

Actinolite

Anthophyllite

OTVKRUSBKC«Hdlose^ ^X

Glass(MW/FG)

Synthetics

Wollasonite

Tate

Hair

Brucite

Other

Color/Pleoc.Morph.

II no long1 no wavyII no straight1 noII blue straight1 blue-greyII no(green) straight1 no(green) straightII no(green) straight1 no(green) straightII no(green) straight1 noXgreen) straight

R.I.Liquid

1.550

1.680

1.680

1.605

1.605

1.605

Relief

LMH

LMH

LMH

LMH

LMH

LMH

BeckeLine


D.S.C.(mm, color)

540(mag)600(blu)480(goW)660(blu)480(gold)420(yell)380(pale yell)580(b. mag.)370XP- yell)480(gold)400(pale yell)660(Wu)

Ref.Index(appx.)

niln 1n IInlnilnlnilnlnilnlnilnl

Extic.(P or 1)

P

Porl

P

1

1

P

SignElong.(+or-)

+

+

-

+

+

+

Biref.(L.M.H)

L

M

L

M

M

M

5 (circle type and one optical N rtyKllilsl Si t* . : '::<fm i? n: f .•• '. Note: ll=parallel. l-perpendtoularFlat, TaperedTwistingIsotropic.Curvingor StraightLong, Uniform X-section.Frayedlino straight1 noII It. green straight1 noLong Tapered or FrayedEnds, Medula, Scaleslino straight1 no

1.550

1.550

1.550

1.620

1.550

1.550

1.550

(yell)(blu)(pi. blu-yell)

(blu-yell)(blu-white)(gld. mag)(blu-mag)(yell)blu (yell plate view)(mag)(blu)(yell)(gold)

1.571.531.52-1.70

1.48-1.621.48-2351.641621.591 541 5511

1.591.58

Undulose

None

P

~P

P

-P

P

+

None

(+)(-)+/-

+

-

M-H

None

LtoH

L

H

L-M

L-M

Other

V-V •:'*:<.»' •;;;;!;;...:;:. :-' :-:; : .• ,'i! '-!*•.,


RES#:

EM#:

DUE DATE:DUE TIME:

Sub-Part:Percent:

ASBESTOS FIBERS______CHRYSOTILEAMOSITECROCIDOLITETREMOLITE-ACTINOLITEANTHOPHYLLITETOTAL ASBESTOS:


Storage Box#:

Client Sample #:

Bl D

PART:A l~)->^Cn *

Physical Description:Phyyc,Fibr Mi Pe Gr CaCO CaSO OT




Point Count Total:

EM#:

Sub Part:Percent

Client Sample #:

B C

<7f

D


'ON-ASBESTOS FIBERS'ON-FIBROUS CONSTITUENTS

ART Physical Description:*>-e>~i 5Vrf .

"B"C

^

jint Count1 1 1 1 1


PointI

MiMiMiMiMi

PePePePePe

GrGrGrGrGr



OTOTOTOTOT

Count By:1 1 1

ANALYZED BY: DATE ANALYZED: 1*2

Point Count Total:


Asbestos:i:!';::::FilK*:r;. V:

:3^<f^^f-:.Chrysolite

Amosile

Cfocidolite

Tremolite

Actinolite

Anthophyllrte

Color/Pleoc.Morph.

II no long1 no wavyII no straight1 noII blue straight1 blue-greyII no(green) straight1 no(green) straightII no(green) straight1 no(green) straightII no(green) straight1 no(green) straight

R.I.Liquid

1 550

1.680

1.680

1.605

1.605

1.605

Relief

LMH

LMH

LMH

LMH

LMH

LMH

BeckeLine


D.S.C.(mm, color)

540(mag)600(blu)480(gok))660(blu)480(goM)420(yeD)380(pale yell)5BO(b. mag.)370(p. yell)480(gold)400(pate yell)660(blu)

Ref.Index(appx.)

niln 1nilnlnilnlnilnlnilnlnilnl

Extic.(P or 1)

P

Porl

P

1

1

P

SignElong.(+or-)

+

•i

•

+

+

+

Biref.(L,M,H)

L

M

L

M

M

M

Other

OTHER FIBERS (circle type and one optical property) ; ! | i! tj 1: ] Note: ll=paraltel, l-perpendicular pfeCelkrtose^v

Glass(MW/FG)

Synthetics

A/ollasonite

Talc

Hair

Brucrte

Other

Flat, TaperedTwistingIsotropic.Curvingor StraightLong, Uniform X-section,Frayedlino straight1 noII It. green straight1 noLong Tapered or FrayedEnds, Medula, Scaleslino straight1 no

1.550

1.550

1.550

1.620

1.550

1.550

1.550


(blu-yell)(blu-whrte)(gld. mag)(blu-mag)(yeB)blu (yell plate view)(mag)(blu)(yell)(gold)

1.571 531.52-1.70

1.48-1.621.48-2.351.641.621.591.541 55 II

1.59458

Undulose

None

P

~P

P

~P

P

+

None

(+>(-)+/-

+

-

M-H

None

LtoH

L

H

L-M

L-M

AsbestosiSTiFaSwr:^::'•mw*m:-Chrysolite

Amosite

Crocidolite

Tremolite

Actinolite

Anthophyllite

Color/Pleoc.Morph.

II no long1 no wavyII no straightInoII blue straight1 blue-greytl no(green) straight1 no(green) straightII no(green) straight1 no(green) straightII no(green) straight1 no(green) straight

R.I.Liquid

1.550

1.680

1.680

1.605

1.605

1.605

Relief

LMH

LMH

LMH

LMH

LMH

LMH

BeckeLine


D.S.C.(mm, color)

540(mag)600(blu)480(gold)660(blu)480(gold)420(yeH)380(pale yell)580(b mag.)370(p. yen)480(gokJ)400(pale yell)660(blu)

Ref.Index(appx.)

niln 1nilnlnilnlnilnlniln 1nilnl

Extic.(P or 1)

P

Porl

P

1

1

P

SignElong.(+or-)

+

+

-

+

+

+

Biref.(t-.M.H)

L

M

L

M

M

M

OTHEB-E1BERS (circle type and one optical prOpertyJ^^filfiifllJv:-?; <fWH ^Mv. Note: ll=parallel, l-perpendicularjBellulose/

Glass(MVwVFG)

Synthetics

Wollasonrte

Talc

Hair

Baicite

Other

Flat, TaperedTwistingIsotropic.Curvingor StraightLong, Uniform X-section,Frayedlino straightI noII It. green straight1 noLong Tapered or FrayedEnds, Medula, Scaleslino straight(no

1 550

1.550

1.550

1 620

1.550

1.550

1.550

(yen)(blu)(pi. blu-yell)

(blu-yeH)(blu-white)(gkJ. mag)(blu-mag)(yell)blu (yeH plate view)(mag)(blu)(yell)(gold)

1.571.531.52-1.70

1.48-1.621.48-2.351.641.621.591.541.5511

1.591.58

Undulose

None

P

-P

P

-P

P

+

None

(+)(-)+/-

+

-

M-H

None

LtoH

L

H

L-M

L-M

Other

ws:9'f-:vf


RES#:

EM#:

DUE DATE:DUE TIME:

Sub-Part:Percent:

ASBESTOS FIBERS ______CHRYSOTILEAMOSITECROCIDOLITETREMOLITE-ACTINOLITEANTHOPHYLLITETOTAL ASBESTOS:


Storage Box#:

Client Sample #:

B: D

PART:A

Physical Description:Gr CaCO CaSO OT




Point Count Total:

Sub-Part:Percent

Client Sample #:

B C D


'ION-ASBESTOS FIBERSION-FIBROUS CONSTITUENTS

2

DART: Physical Description:£?m&-*sr> i- (

~BC

•-.

oint Count1 1 1 1 1

FibrFibrFibrFibr

Point1

MiMiMiMi

'PePePePePe

GrGrGrGrGr



OTOTOTOTOT

Count By:1 1 1

ANALYZED BY: DATE ANALYZED: #-1*2

Point Count Total:


Asbestos' • : ' : ' - . Fiber • : : : ; ; ; • ;

(circle)Chrysolite

Amosite

Crocidolite

Tremolite

Actinblite^

AnthophyllHe

Color/Pleoc.Morph.


R.I.Liquid

1.550

1.680

1.680

1.605

•^f.606

1.605

Relief

LMH

LMH

LMH

LMH

L&H

LMH

BeckeLine


OTHEKJpBERS (circle type and one optical property) iif! ill :L SI '! 1 s|:£e4hrt6se j

Glass(MW/FG)

Synthetics

Wollasonite

Talc

Hair

Brucite

Other

Flat, TaperedTwistingIsotropic.Curvingor StraightLong, Uniform X-section,Frayedlino straightno

II It. green straightI noLong Tapered or FrayedEnds, Medula, Scaleslino straightI no

1.550

1 550

1.550

1.620

1.550

1.550

1 550

D.S.C.(mm, color)

540(mag)600(blu)480(gold)660(blu)480(gold)420(yell)380(pate yell)580(b. mag.)370(p. yell) /*"480(gold) '400(pate yell)660(blu)

Ref.Index(appx.)

nilnln IInln IInlnilnlnilnlnilnl

Extic.(P or 1)

P

Porl

P

1

-rr~\ — .

P

SignElong.(+or-)

+

+

-

+

+

Biref.(L.M.H)

L

M

L

M

"_M^/

M

Other

III! Til.!;! : v mmfft Note: ll=paraltel, l-perpendicular pjff :K ;.•:; : .;;•; : , ; : •.(yen)(blu)(pi. blu-yell)

(blu-yell)(blu-whrte)(gld. mag)(blu- mag)(yell)blu (yell plate view)(mag)(blu)(yell)(gold)

1.571.531.52-1.70

1.48-1.621.48-2.351.641.621.591.541.5511

1.594.58

Undulose

None

P

~P

P

~P

P

-f

None

(+)(-)+/-

+

-

M-H

None

LtoH

L

H

L-M

L-M

Asbestos- mm;::^-(afcie)f;?:eftfysotfle")^ — _ — — — •-"

Amosite

Crocidolite

Tremolite

A£finolrje">

Anthophyllite

Color/Pleoc.Morph.

II no long1 no _w3vyII no ""straight1 noII blue straight1 blue-greyII no(green) straight1 no(green) straightII no(green) straight1 no(green) straightII no(green) straight1 no(green) straight

R.I.Liquid

<£&>

1.680

1.680

1.605

£E$5

1.605

Relief

^MH

LMH

LMH

LMH

L$m

LMH

BeckeLine


D.S.C.(mm, color)

540(mag) </600(blu) /

480(gokl)660(blu)480(gokJ)420(yeB)380(pale yell)580(b. mag.)370(p. yell) ''480(gokJ) "400(pale yell)660(blu)

Ref.Index(appx.)

nilnlnilnlnilnlnilnlniln 1nilnl

Extic.(P or 1)

(L*L^Porl

P

'

CL^p

SignElong.(*or-)

"CLJ+-»

'~~~^\+

Biref.(L,M,H)

2^)M

L

M

"2^>M

Other

OTHER FIBERS (circle type, and one optical Note: ll=paraltel. l-perpendicular tSSZU-K'^S:esncRsse-

Glass(MVWFG)

Synthetics

Wollasonite

Talc

Hair

Brucite

Other

Flat. TaperedTwistingIsotropic.Curvingor StraightLong, Uniform X-section,Frayedlino straightI noII It. green straightI noLong Tapered or FrayedEnds, Medula, Scaleslino straightno

1.550

1.550

1.550

1620

1.550

1.550

1.550


(blu-yell)(blu-whrte)(gld. mag)(blu-mag)(yeH)blu (yen plate view)(mag)(blu)(yell)(gold)

1.571.531.52-1.70

.48-1.62

.48-2.35

.64

.62

.59

.54

.5511

.59

.58

Undulose

None

P

~P

P

-P

P

+None

W(-)+/-

+

-

M-H

None

LtoH

L

H

L-M

L-M


RES#:

EM#:

DUE DATE:DUE TIME:

Sub-PartPercent:

ASBESTOS FIBERS ______CHRYSOTILEAMOSITECROCIDOLITETREMOLITE-ACTINOLITEANTHOPHYLLITETOTAL ASBESTOS:


Storage Box#:

Client Sample #:

B D

72?

PART:A

—, Physical Description:(0 S^rC ________ Fibr Mi Pe Gr CaCO CaSO OT




Point Count Total:

EM#:

Sub-PartPercent:

Client Sample #:

B C D

ASBESTOS FIBERSCHRYSOTILEAMOSITECROCIDOLITETR E MOLITE-ACTINOLITEANTHOPHYLLITETOTAL ASBESTOS:

'ON-ASBESTOS FIBERS'ON-FIBROUS CONSTITUENTS

'ART- Physical Description:f5^o~t<t/^> S5./7

HC

TCT

>int Counti i i i i


Point1

MiMiMiMiMi

PePePePePe

GrGrGrGrGr



OTOTOTOTOT

Count By:1 1 1

\NALYZED BY: DATE ANALYZED:

Point Count Total:


Asbestos•::j;.FibefV

(circle)Chrysolite

Amosite

Croctdolite

Tremolrte

A.rtinr'IHo -)-

Anlhophyllite

Color/Pleoc.Morph.


R.I.Liquid

1.550

1.680

1.680

1.605

'leod

1.605

Relief

LMH

LMH

LMH

LMH

&«H

LMH

BeckeLine


D.S.C.(mm, color)

540(mag)GOO(blu)480<goM)660(blu)480(gold)420(yell)380(pale yell)580(b. mag.)370(p. yell) <'480(gokJ) /400(pa(e yell)660<blu)

Ref.Index(appx.)

nilnlnilnlniln 1nilnlnilnlnilnl

Extic.(Porl)

P

Porl

P

1

(f\_

P

SignElong.(+or-)

+

+

-

•f

y+ji+

Biref.(L,M,H)

L

M

L

M

M >

M

Other*

+

OJHER-HBERS (circle type and one optical p>bjpjertjfir i3^ Note: ll=paraltel, l-perpendicular «ii ;: .'. : : ,

fce&rfosej

Glass(MW/FG)

Synthetics

Wollasonrte

Tate

Hair

Brucile

Other

Flat. TaperedTwistingIsotropic.Curvingor StraightLong, Uniform X-section,Frayedlino straight1 noII It. green straight1 noLong Tapered or FrayedEnds, Medula, Scaleslino straight1 no

1.550

1.550

1.550

1.620

1.550

1 550

1 550


(blu-yeU)(blu-white)(gld. mag)(blu-mag)(yeH)blu (yeH plate view)(mag)(blu)(yeH)(gold)

.57

.53

.52-1.70

.48-1.62

.48-2.351.641.621.591.541.5511

1.594.58

Undulose

None

P

~P

P

-P

P

+None

(+)(-)+/-

+

-

M-H

None

LtoH

L

H

LM

L-M

Asbestos: .;: FibeVUJ.-- :.- - U-i[:':-V-;V-"- '"••'•'•'^Jorcte)

Crwsotile}

Amosite

CrockJolite

Tremolrte

Sctinolite}.' '

Anthophyllite

Color/Pleoc.Morph.


R.I.Liquid

1.550

1.680

1.680

1.605

d^H

1.605

Relief

LMH

LMH

LMH

LMH

VH

LMH

OTHER FIBERS (circle type and one optical property)Qftttdlose )

Glass(MVWFG)

Synthetics

Wollasonrte

Talc

Hair

irucite

Other

Flat, TaperedTwistingIsotropic.Curvingor StraightLong, Uniform X-section,Frayedlino straight1 noII It. green straightInoLong Tapered or FrayedEnds, Medula, Scaleslino straightno

1.550

1.550

1 550

1620

1.550

1.550

1.550

BeckeLine


D.S.C.(mm, color)

540(mag)600(blu)480(gold)660(blu)480(goM)420(yeH)380(pale yell)580(b. mag.)370(p. yell) Y480XgokJ) /400(pale yell)660(blu)

Ref.Index(appx.)

nilnlnilnlnilnlnilnlnil <nlnilnl

Extic.(P or I)

P

Porl

P

1

P

SignElong.(+or-)

+

+

-

+

^"+j[O

+

Biref.(L.M.H)

L

M

L

M

M^>

M

Note: ll=paraltel, l-perpendicular(yell)(blu)(pi. blu-yell)

(blu-yell)(blu-white)(gld. mag)(blu-mag)(yeH)t>lu (yell plate view)(mag)(blu)(yell)(gold)

1.571.531.52-1.70

1.48-1.621.48-2.351.641.621.591.541.5511

1.591.58

Undulose

None

P

~P

P

~P

P

+

None

W(-)+/-

+

-

M-H

None

LtoH

L

H

L-M

L-M

Other

BWBWffS*


RES#:

EM#:

DUE DATE:DUE TIME:

Sub-Part:Percent:

ASBESTOS FIBERS______CHRYSOTILEAMOSITECROCIDOLITETREMOLITE-ACTINOLITEANTHOPHYLLITETOTAL ASBESTOS:


Storage Box#:

Client Sample #:

B D

-77?

PART: Physical Description:Fibr Mi Pe Gr CaCO CaSO OT




Point Count Total:

~EM#:

Sub Part:Percent:

Client Sample #:

A B C D


ION-ASBESTOS FIBERSION-FIBROUS CONSTITUENTS

ART: Physical Description:

"BC

-«=•

Dint Count1 1 I 1 1


Point|

MiMiMiMiMi

PePePePePe

GrGrGrGrGr



OTOTOTOTOT

Count By:1 1 1

ANALYZED BY: DATE ANALYZED: 702

Point Count Total:

BASIC SCOPE CAL:(record on first analysis form tn series)

Asbestos; . ; • • • • . Fiber^-:'

;: (circle) >C>rysotiieL)

Amosite

CrockJolrle

Tremolite

Actirtoiite>(L^-"Anthophyllite

Color/Pleoc.Morph.

II no long^^-—1 no jyavy^PII no </Z-stfaTght1 noII blue straight1 blue-greyII no(green) straight1 no(green) straightII no(green) straight1 no(green) straightII no(green) straight1 no(green) straight

R.I.Liquid

T^tt}/

1 680

1.680

1.605

<**&1.605

Relief

^MH

LMH

LMH

LMH

10 H

LMH

BeckeLine


OTHER FIBERS (circle type and one optical pro0erty)'45|:K fe> Js :1 i i ; i ?;j : '•' ••• rli ' ; :CelTuipseN

Glass(MVWFG)

Synthetics

Wollasonite

Talc

Hair

Srucfte

Other

Flat. TaperedTwistingIsolropic, Curvingor StraightLong, Uniform X-section,Frayedlino straight1 noII It. green straight1 noLong Tapered or FrayedEnds, Medula, Scaleslino straight1 no

1.550

1.550

1.550

1.620

1.550

1.550

1.550

D.S.C.(mm, color)

540(mag) -£-600(blu) /480(gold)660(blu)480(gold)420(yeli)380(pale yell)580(b. mag.)370(p. yell) f480(gold) /400(pale yell)660(blu)

Ref.Index(appx.)

nilnlnilnlnilnlnilnlnilnlniln 1

Extic.(P or I)

<S^Porl

P

I

dj-£2

P

SignElong.

,£2tL

+

-

+

*C?

+

Biref.(L.M.H)

M

L

M

.d-M

Other*

e»

fflftilftfi1;! •;:.;'•& iVkiijv:;^ Note: ll=paraltel, l-petpendicular I t t^ . - . • ' • '(yell)(blu)(pi. blu-yell)

(blu-yell)(blu-whrte)(gld. mag)(blu-mag)(yell)blu (yell plate view)(mag)(blu)(yell)(gold)

.57

.53

.52-1.70

.48-162

.48-2.35

.64

.62

.591.541.5511

1.594.58

Undulose

None

P

~P

P

~P

P

+

None

<+)(-)+/-

+

-

M-H

None

LtoH

L

H

L-M

L-M

Asbestos::;; ;;. Fiber, :4J: .

Gttrysotile/

Amosite

Crocidoltte

Tremolite

Aetmofite,>

Anthophyllite

Color/Pleoc.Morph.


R.I.Liquid

1.550

1.680

1.680

1.605

•rSoSt

1.605

Relief

LMH

LMH

LMH

LMH

L^H

LMH

BeckeLine


D.S.C.(mm, color)

540(mag)600(blu)480(gold)660(blu)480(gold)420(yelf)380(pale yell)580(b. mag.)370(p. yell) /480(goW) ^400(pate yell)660(blu)

Ref.Index(appx.)

nilnlniln Inilnlnilnlnilnlnilnl

Extic.(P or 1)

P

Porl

P

1

^\

P

SignElong.(+OT-)

+

•f

-

•f

CJ•f

Biref.<L,M,H)

L

M

L

M

l^>

M

Other

OTHER FIBEf»; (circle type: and one optical Note: ll=parallel, l-perpendicular :-*•CetttJIose"

—— -^Glass(MW/FG)

Synthetics

Wollasonite

Tate

Hair

BmcHe

Other

Flat, TaperedTwistingIsotropic, Curvingor StraightLong, Uniform X-section,Frayedlino straight1 noII It. green straight1 noLong Tapered or FrayedEnds, Medula. Scaleslino straight1 no

1.550

1.550

1.550

1.620

1.550

1.550

1.550


(blu-yell)(blu-whrte)(gld. mag)(blu-mag)(yell)blu (yell plate view)(mag)(blu)(yell)(gold)

1.571.531.52-1.70

1.48-1.621.48-2.351.641.62.59.54.5511

.59

.58

Undulose

None

P

~P

P

~P

P

+

None

<+)(-)+/-

+

-

M-H

None

LtoH

L

H

L-M

L-M


RES#:

EM#:

DUE DATE:DUE TIME:

Sub-Part:Percent:

ASBESTOS FIBERS_______CHRYSOTILEAMOSITECROCIDOLITETREMOLITE-ACTINOLITEANTHOPHYLLITETOTAL ASBESTOS:


Storage Box#:Client Sample #:

B D/•

PART:A

Physical Description:Fibr Mi Pe Gr CaCO CaSO OT

B Fibr Mi Pe Gr CaCO CaSO OTFibr Mr Pe Gr CaCO CaSO OT



Point Count Total:

Sub-Part:Percent:

Client Sample #:

B C D

ASBESTOS FIBERSCHRYSOTILEAMOSITECROCIDOLITETREMOLITE-ACTINOLITEANTHOPHYLLITETOTAL ASBESTOS.

'ION-ASBESTOS FIBERStON-FIBROUS CONSTITUENTS

DART: Physieal Description:p^>~o7 <-cxV-> -SW-f

~BC

•«

Dint Counti i i i i


MiMiMiMiMi

PePePePePe

GrGrGrGrGr



OTOTOTOTOT

Point Count By:1 1 1 1

ANALYZED BY. DATE ANALYZED:

Point Count Total:

BASIC SCOPE CAL(record on first analysis form in series)

Asbestos:--TSJi«fy^<$K^Chrysotite

Amosrte

Crocidolite

Tremolite

Actinoltte

Anthophyllrte

Color/Piece.Morph.


R.I.Liquid

1.550

1.680

1.680

1.605

1.605

1.605

Relief

LMH

LMH

LMH

LMH

LMH

LMH

BeckeLine


D.S.C.(mm.color)

540(mag)600(blu)480(gold)660(blu)480(gokl)420(yeH)380(pale yell)580(b. mag.)370(p. yell)480(gold)400(pate yell)660(blu)

Ref.Index(appx.)

niln 1nilnlnilnln IInlnilnlniln 1

Extic.(P or 1)

P

Port

P

1

1

P

SignElong.(+or-)

+

+

-

+

+

•f

Biref.(L.M.H)

L

M

L

M

M

M

Other?

t

*

OTHEKTiBERS (circle type and one opM«!iar'p>bp^ *iffiS«!W*y;?';:.:f -: J !^>M^W^?m^-:\ Note: ll=parallel. l-perpendicular iiiK; :•• '.; ' : . :Seljulpsey

Glass(MW/FG)

Synthetics

Wollasonrte

Talc

Hair

Brucile

Other

Flat, TaperedTwistingIsotropic.Curvingor StraightLong, Uniform X-section,Frayedlino straight1 noII It. green straightInoLong Tapered or FrayedEnds, Medula, Scaleslino straight1 no

1.550

1.550

1.550

1.620

1.550

1.550

1.550


(blu-yell)(blu-white)(gld. mag)(blu-mag)(yell)blu (yen plate view)(mag)(blu)(yell)(gold)

1.571.531.52-1.70

1.48-1621.48-2.351641621.591.541.5511

1.594.58

Undulose

None

P

~P

P

~P

P

+•

None

(+)(-)+/-

+

-

M-H

None

LtoH

L

H

L-M

L-M

Asbestosmmi»&.:;':KJ-i-!«;iW|si5K:i.3:

•' -" : ' f Ajfy*lffc \ >-: •-•-•-'• •::;: >..ly"Ciej :i:;:::;;;

Chrysotile

Amosrte

Crocidolite

Tremolite

ActtnolHe

Anthophyllrte

Color/Pleoc.Morph.

II no long1 no wavyII no straightInoII blue straight1 blue-greyII no(green) straight1 no(green) straightII no(green) straight1 no(green) straightII no(green) straight1 no(green) straight

R.I.Liquid

1.550

1.680

1.680

1.605

1.605

1.605

Relief

LMH

LMH

LMH

LMH

LMH

LMH

BeckeLine


D.S.C.(mm.color)

540(mag)600(blu)480(gokJ)660(blu)480(gokJ)420(ye»)380(pate yell)580(b. mag.)370(p. yell)480(gokJ)400(pate yell)660(bru)

Ref.Index(appx.)

nilnlnilnlnilnlnilnlnilnlnilnl

Extic.(P or 1)

P

Porl

P

1

' :

P

SignElong.(+or-)

*

+

-

4-

-••

•f

Biref.(L.M.H)

L

M

L

M

M

M

Other

OTHgaBBERS: (circle type and .one' optical jpljt>perty)sJ: >:4 <3 Note: ll=paraltel, l-perpendicular tm®^ ^Oelutose \

Glass(MW/FG)

Synthetics

Wollasonrte

Tate

Hair

Brucite

Other

Flat, TaperedTwistingIsotropic.Curvingor StraightLong, Uniform X-section,Frayedlino straightInoII It. green straight1 noLong Tapered or FrayedEnds, Medula, ScalesIno straight

1 no

1.550

1.550

1.550

1.620

1.550

1.550

1.550


(blu-yeH)(blu-white)(gld. mag)(blu-mag)(yen)blu (yell plate view)(mag)(blu)(yell)(gold)

1 571.531.52-1.70

1.48-1.621.48-2.351.641.621 591.541.5511

1.591.58

Undulose

None

P

~P

P

-P

P

•••

None

W(-)+/-

+

-

M-H

None

LtoH

L

H

L-M

L-M


RES*:

EM#:

DUE DATE:DUE TIME:

Sub- Part.Percent:

Storage Box#:Client Sample #:

B D

FIBERSCHRYSOTILEAMOSITECROCIDOLITETREMOLITE-ACTINOLITEANTHOPHYLLITETOTAL ASBESTOS:


Fibr Mi Pe Gr CaCO CaSO OTB Fibr Mi Pe Gr CaCO CaSO OT

Fibr Mi Pe Gr CaCO CaSO OTFibr Mi Pe Gr CaCO CaSO OTFibr Mi Pe Gr CaCO CaSO OT


Point Count Total:

Sub Part.Percent

ASBESTOS FIBERS________CHRYSOTILEAMOSITECROCIDOLITETREMOLITE-ACTINOLITEANTHOPHYLLITETOTAL ASBESTOS:

ION-ASBESTOS FIBERSW-FIBROUS CONSTITUENTS

Client Sample #:

B C

f f l

D

ART: Physical Description:Fibr Mi Pe Gr CaCO CaSO OTFibr Mi Pe Gr CaCO CaSO OTFibr Mi Pe Gr CaCO CaSO OTFibr Mi Pe Gr CaCO CaSO OTFibr Mi Pe Gr CaCO CaSO OT

it Count Point Count By:< I

uYZED BY: DATE ANALYZED: <#-P2. lor

Point Count Total:


; ; Asbestos;;-:;--Tn>er.::; -

; (circle)Chrysolite

Amosite

Crocidolite

Tremolrte

Actmolite^

Anthophyllrte

Color/Pleoc.Morph.


R.I.Liquid

1.550

1.680

1.680

1.605

(<g05>

1.605

Relief

LMH

LMH

LMH

LMH

l$H

LMH

BeckeLine


OTHER FIBERS (circle type arid one optical property) 3Cjpose-y-

Glass(MVWFG)

Synthetics

Wollasonite

Talc

Hair

3rucile

Other

Flat, TaperedTwistingIsotropic, Curvingor StraightLong, Uniform X-section,Frayedlino straight1 noII It. green straight1 noLong Tapered or FrayedEnds, Medula, Scaleslino straight1 no

1.550

1.550

1.550

1.620

1.550

1.550

1.550

D.S.C.(mm.color)

540(mag)600(blu)480(gokJ)660(blu)480(gokJ)420(yell)380(pate yell)580(b. mag.)370(p. yell) 'f480(gold) /400(pale yell)660(blu)

Ref.Index(appx.)

nilnlnilnlnilnlnilnlnilnlnilnl

Extic.(P or 1)

P

Porl

P

1

( I

P

SignElong.(+or-)

+

+

-

+

^+

Biref.(L,M,H)

L

M

L

M

> M

M

Other

)

JliKit's !:!i :: ; i K:, " * ! >.< : • Note: ll=parallel, l-perpendicular '!: •; .v: i..: ',-:•'- ••'•••(yell)(blu)(pi. blu-yell)

(blu-yell)(blu-white)(gld. mag)(blu-mag)(yell)blu (yell plate view)(mag)(blu)(yell)(gold)

1.571.531.52-1.70

1.48-1.621.48-2.351.641.621.591.541.5511

1.594.58

Undulose

None

P

~P

P

-P

P

+•

None

<+>(-)+/-

+

-

M-H

None

LtoH

L

H

L-M

L-M

Asbestos

• .*$$K1?Qfin^soWe )

Amosite

Crocidolite

Tremolrte

A^noTR -

Anthophyllite

Color/Pleoc.Morph.

II no toncL____-1 no <3J£avy^~~~II no straight1 noII blue straight1 blue-greyII no(green) straight1 no(green) straightII no(green) straight1 no(green) straightII no(green) straight1 no(green) straight

R.I.Liquid

1.680

1.680

1.605

1.605

Relief

LMH

LMH

LMH

l$H

LMH

OTHER FIBERS (circle type and one optical property)ZeTlutose^S

Glass(MW/FG)

Synthetics

Wollasonite

Tate

Hair

Brucile

Other

Flat, TaperedTwistingIsotropic, Curvingor StraightLong, Uniform X-section,Frayedlino straight1 noII It. green straight1 noLong Tapered or FrayedEnds, Medula, Scaleslino straight1 no

1.550

1.550

1.550

1.620

1.550

1.550

1.550

BeckeLine


D.S.C.(mm.color)

540(mag)600(blu)480(gold)660(blu)480(gold)420(yeff)380(pate yell)580(b. mag.)370(p. yell) f480(goW) /•400(pate yell)660(blu)

i ggKt ^(yen)(blu)(pi. blu-yell)

(blu-yell)(blu-white)(gld. mag)(blu-mag)(yell)blu (yeH plate view)(mag)(blu)(yell)(gold)

Ref.Index(appx.)

nil <;nlnilnlnilnlnilnlnilnlnilnl

Extic.(Porl)

IJLJPorl

P

<C \ 1

P

SignElong.

—-+

*

-

i*

Biref.(L.M.H)

M

L

M

evM

Other

Note: ll=parallel, l-perpendicular 1 ;u f;WtiN #A %.57.53.52-1.70

.48-1.62

.48-2.351.641.621.591.541.5511

1.591 58

Undulose

None

P

~P

P

-P

P

*None

0+/-

*

-

M-H

None

LtoH

L

H

L-M

L-M

RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.FLM ASBESTOS ANALYSIS - SHORT REPORT

RES*.

EM#:

DUE DATE:DUE TIME:

Sub-Part:Percent:

ASBESTOS F/BEKS_______CHRYSOTILEAMOSITECROCIDOLITETREMOLITE-ACTINOLITEANTHOPHYLLITETOTAL ASBESTOS:

/VOAMSBESrOS F/BERSNON-FIBROUS CONSTITUENTS

Storage Box#:

Client Sample #:

B. D

PART:A

Physical Description:Fibr Mi Pe Gr CaCO CaSO OT



Point Count Point Count By:

Point Count Total:

~EM#:

Sub-Part:Percent:

Client Sample #:

B C

CHRYSOTILEAMOSITECROCIDOLITETREMOLITE-ACTINOLITEANTHOPHYLLITETOTAL ASBESTOS:

•fON-ASBESTOS FIBERSION-FIBROUS CONSTITUENTS 3ZL

PAR Physical Description:I iL^y^^^^ 5^i_

T*

C1

—


MiMiMiMiMi

PePePePePe

GrGrGrGrGr



OTOTOTOTOT

oint Count Point Count By:"I I

ANALYZED BY: DATE ANALYZED:

Point Count Total:

BASIC SCOPE CAL.:(record on first analysis form in series)

Asbestos

S?8K?-

Amosite

Croctdofite

TremolHe

Actinolite^--

Anlhophyllrte

Color/Pleoc.Morph.

II no long1 no ^w5vy~ ~~"II no '—"straight1 noII blue straight1 blue-greyII no(green) straight1 no(green) straightII no(green) ^Jrakjht ^1 no(green) straightII no(green) straight1 no(green) straight

R.I.Liquid

/1*S&

1.680

1.680

1.605

rrsps

1.605

Relief

'DMH

LMH

LMH

LMH

L^H

LMH

BeckeLine


D.S.C.(mm, color)

540(mag) / /600(blu) s480(gold)660(blu)480(gold)420(yell)38(Xpate yell)580(b. mag.)370(p. yell) ' '480(goM) f400(pate yell)660(blu)

Ref.Index(appx.)

nil /nl ^nilnlnilnlnilnlnilnlniln 1

Extic. 1

(P or 1)

H^Porl

P

1

<u—P

SignElong.(+or-)

J>+

+

-

+

?**

+•

Biref.(L.M.H)

M

L

M

M ^

M

OTHER FIBERS (circfe type and one optical property) i ! ; B ! ; | i Its i ; i Note: ll=paraltel, l-perpendicularCeftolose^

Glass(MW/FG)

Synthetics

Wollasonite

Talc

Hair

Brucite

Other

Flat, TaperedTwistingIsotropic, Curvingor StraightLong, Uniform X-section,Frayedlino straightI noII It. green straight1 noLong Tapered or FrayedEnds, Medula, Scaleslino straight1 no

1.550

1.550

1.550

1.620

1.550

1.550

1.550


(blu-yell)(blu-white)(gld. mag)(blu- mag)(yeH)blu (yell plate view)(mag)(blu)(yell)(gold)

1.571.531.52-1.70

1.48-1.621.48-2.35.64.62.59.54.5511

1.594.58

Undulose

None

P

~P

P

~P

P

+

None

(+)(-)+/-

+•

-

M-H

None

LtoH

L

H

LM

L-M

„ Other•

i3

Asbestos

{ctrclej j: •Chrysotile

Amosite

Crocidolile

Tremolite

Actinolite

AnthophylWe

Color/Pleoc.Morph.

II no long1 no wavyII no straightInoII blue straight1 blue-greyII no(green) straight1 no(green) straightII no(green) straight1 no(green) straightII no(green) straight1 mXgreen) straight

R.I.Liquid

1.550

1.680

1.680

1.605

1.605

1.605

Relief

LMH

LMH

LMH

LMH

LMH

LMH

BeckeLine


OTHER FIBERS- fcircte ty pe and one optical p rxs rty)::l!:r!lilBjl*:'h 1 ft tftceoaotfO

Glass(MW/FG)

Synthetics

Wollasonite

Talc

Hair

Jructte

Other

Flat, TaperedTwistingIsotropic.Curvingor StraightLong, Uniform X-section,Frayedlino straight1 noII It. green straight1 noLong Tapered or FrayedEnds, Medula. ScalesIno straightno

1.550

1.550

1.550

1.620

1.550

1.550

1.550

D.S.C.(mm, color)

540(mag)600(blu)480(gokJ)660(blu)480(gold)420(yell)380(pate yell)580(b. mag.)370(p. yell)480(gokJ)400(pate yell)660(blu)


(blu-yell)(blu-white)(gld. mag) '(blu-mag)(yell)blu (yell plate view)(mag)(blu)(yell)(gold)

Ref.Index(appx.)

nilnlnilnlnilnlnilnlniln 1nilnl

Extic.(P or 1)

P

Porl

P

1

1

P

SignElong.

*

-

*

*

*

Biref.(L.M.H)

L

M

L

M

M

M

Other

Note: ll=parallel, l-perpendicular ?f:{j-W; 8.57.53.52-1.70

.48-1.62

.48-2.351.641.62

59.54.5511

.59

.58

Undulose

None

P

-P

P

-P

P

*

None

(-)+/-

*

-

M-H

None

LtoH

L

H

L-M

L-M

Lab Sample*:

Prepared By:

RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.PLM ASBESTOS ANALYSIS - LAB BLANK/RECOUNT

RES #:

Date Prepared:

SUB-PART: APERCENT: /op

B D

ASBESTOS FIBERSCHRYSOTILEAMOSITECROCIDOUTETREMOUTE-ACTINOUTEANTHOPHYLUTE

TOTAL ASBESTOS

PART: PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:

B

D

ORIGINAL ANALYZED BY:

QC ANALYZED BY:

DATE ANALYZED:

DATE ANALYZED:

Lab Sampled:

Prepared By:

RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.PLM ASBESTOS ANALYSIS - LAB BLANK/RECOUNT

RES#:

Date Prepared:

SUB-PART: APERCENT: ,00

B

ASBESTOS F/BERSCHRVS077LEAWOS/fECROC/DOU7ETREMOUTE-ACT1NOUTEANTHOPHYLUTE

TOTAL ASBESTOS

PART: PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:^—/(^__________

B

D

ORIGINAL ANALYZED BY:

QC ANALYZED BY:

D

DATE ANALYZED:

DATE ANALYZED:

. ca

RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC,NVLAP:#101896; TDH: #30-0015

TABLE I. TEM MICROVAC SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

RES Job Number:Client:Client Project Number / P.O.:Client Project Description:Date Samples Received:

RES 75707CDM Federal ProgramsN/ALibby, Montana AsbestosMarch 7,2001

Analysis Typ t: TEM Micr ovac, DustTurnaround: Standard

Client LabID Number ID Number

PA1-00105- Amphibole EM 530064PAl-OQIOS-Chrysotile

PAI-00106 - Amphibole EM 530065PAl-00106-Chrysotile

PA1-OOI07 - Amphibole EM 530066PAl-00107-Chrysotile

PAl-00108-Arophibole EM 530067PAl-00108-Chrysotile

PA1-00109 EM 530068

AreaSampled

(cm1)300300

300300

300300

300300

300

Aliquot TotalDeposited Suspension

onFilter(mL) (mL)0.1250.125

0.1250.125

.0125

.0125

0.50.5

20

100100

100100

100100

1000010000

100

TotalNumber of

AsbestosStructures

DetectedND9ft

115

220

6456

ND

Analytical TotalSensitivity Asbestos

Concentration

(s/cm1) (s/cm*)51057293

Total concentration:51055105




BAS7146677)4667

51057657181676

102095102095211230481914286

145485714147400000

BASPA1-OOUO EM 530069 300 20 100 ND 32

NA-Not AnalyzedND = None DetectedBAS- Below Analytical SensitivityAliquot - Amount of suspension itdeposited in lab on 201 mn? filter.

Note: ASTM defines an Anlytical Sensitivity of 1000 en? for this method.

.c*

c.cc.aa

aa

gc/

BAS

cc

RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.NVLAP: K101896; TDH: #30-0015

TABLE n. SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA

RES Job Number: RES 75707Client: CDM Federal ProgramsClient Project Number / P.O.: N/AClient Project Description: Libby, Montana AsbestosDate Samples Received: March 7,2001Analysis Type: TEM Microvac, DustTurnaround: Standard

ClientED Number

LabID Number

AsbestosMineral

Asbestos Structures

Structures * "Excluded>5 Microns Structures

in Length

AsbestosStructures

forConcentration

PAI-D038 - AmphibolePA1-0038 - ChrysotDe

PA1-0039 • AmphibolePA1-0039 - ChrysotDe

PA1-0040 - AmphibolePAl-0040 - Chrysotile

PA1-0041- AmphibolePAl-0041 - Cbrysotile

PA 1-0060PA1-0061

EM

EM

EM

EM

EMEM

530305

530306

530307

530308

530309530310

Trem/ActChrysotile

Trem/ActChrysotile

Trem/ActChrysotile

Trem/ActChrysotile

NDND

ND98

115

220

6456

00

07

02

3-A0

4-A1-A

00

00

00

00

0

00

098

115

220

6456

00

**C =» Excluded from total due to lack of confirmation**L» Excluded (torn total for length less (ban 0.5 micron (AHERA only)** A. - Excluded from total due to incorrect aspect ratioND » None Detected

ca

c

*

c,c

eca

p

£c

ca

RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.NVLAP Accredited Laboratory #101896

TABLE I. TEM M1CROVAC FILTER SAMPLE DATA AND ANALYTICAL RESULTS

a

RES Job NumberCll«r*cn«nl Prajecl:D»t» Samples Renlvid:Analysis Type:Turnaround:

RES 75707-1COM F«der»l ProgramsLlbby A»b«>toiMarch 7,2001ISO 1031 Z.MIcrovaeStandard

?oa

S»mpfiaPA2-W10SPA3-O3I06PAS-001 WPA2-OOtO?PA3OOI08PA3-OOIO3PA2-00110

unoEM S30064*EM S30W4DEM 53DO&5EM 53O366EM S30067EM S3006IEM 530069

FTl»ITS!S735JT55S7S5S7555754379S

M<*tid10312103131031210312101121031210312

DinRac0107101<XM)M>101<17«lOVD7N103/B7Wt03117/0103ID7/I1

DMnv<FV j

0.001250.001250.001J50.001250.00009

>.202

DlKAndO*MJ(H

(WWflMCM/2lrD104/1 >>D104/20iUa04/1 AOI04/1 B(01

BO-10710ItA10to

(>q. rrmOOSIM

0010.010«tOila. 11anan

AdJnrtlBEnM** smiauiu

Aip«M Rlto«3:»AIM0a034«0

lingo<MliAc*»000000

Dlimeli»0£uAc<000tJ00

SlnKtjma.CttKl*aLenglh

O.ftto»<Awl

0012400

linglll3lo1fl»

Ac-«000000a

Lengt>1IKA^T

c00004a

Chry»alflBEidudetfSliuXun*

Atpid FU»o<5:1Ch-l

AirphkioM cr1B0100

lengti<O.IuCh-tjlH-1

a0a00o

Xmil*>05uCh-c

43010001ItD

SUucMKS DMaaedUng»i

>Jto5uCrvd

911320

4290ft

lenglli5 to 10 L

Cti-t

s24

23»0

Linglt>HL

CK-1

2{02Cc

OlhEr AirpnOotol

TvpiKlD

:htfl40•JD<D4ONO

EidwM StnicturM»lpeclRllli

«5dOI4

»MmndAni

0000(

LtngUi<O.EU

CH-b<

•hboui>0000

Dlwrali>OJ\iOK

ftferlGC

00040

SMxlnsDMKtalUnglh

Q.itoBiOH

0i

001»0

L«nolf>SVjlOu

OVt0

01)r>00

Unsrth>10uOH

0

00000

ConnwiH

aa

MO * Kont OilKUdtr

75707-2MVJ<|J f o r t cc

RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.NVLAP Accredited Laboratory #1896

TABLE I. TEM AIR FILTER SAMPLE DATA AND ANALYTICAL RESULTS


75706CDM Federal ProgramLibby Montana03/07/01ISO, 10312 AIR3-5 Day

ClientID Number

PA2-00099PA2-00100PA2-00101PA2-00102PA2-00103PA2-00104

ID

EMEMEMEMEMEM

LabNumber

530058530059530060530061530062530063

AreaAnalyzed

(mm2)0.10100.10100.10100.10100.10100.1010

AirVolume

Sampled

(L)3982393038873655

00

Number ofAsbestos

StructuresDetected

NDNDNDNDNDND

AnalyticalSensitivity

(s/cc)0.00100.00100.00100.0010

AsbestosConcentration

(s/cc)BASBASBASBASBASBAS

FilterLoading

(s/mm2)BASBASBASBASBASBAS

NA = Not Analyzed Filter Material = Mixed Cellulose EsterND = None Detected Filter Diameter = 25 mmBAS = Below Analytical Sensitivity Effective Filter Area = 385 sq mmAverage Grid Opening = 0.0101 sq mm

DATA QA

APPENDIX GACM Survey Results

• Office Building (1)

• Buildings (2), (3), (4)

DOT Volpe CenterCOM Federal Programs CorporationRA Report - Former Vermiculrte of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI06/22/01

SUSPECT ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL (ACM) CHECKLIST

G&Jo/Joi»• ^ **/•? «?/**•> ri fProject Number

Location: Off, / * AtJ, IJ,

Date: Page 1 of 2

InspectorjSn , fj, /%/^ U

MATERIALTYPE

VermiculiteInsulation

SUSPECTED^(Y/N)

A/

v_xVERIFIED

(Y/N)

ySAMPLED

(Y/N)

VLOCATION

//,.,^û/^/,vW*/,< «O

MATERIAL TYPE(THERMAL SYSTEMS (TSI))Boiler InsulationDuct InsulationDucting PipeElectrical InsulationFurnace InsulationMudded Pipe JointsPipe InsulationPipe Thread CompoundRefractory MaterialTank/Vessel InsulationThermal PaperOthers:

PRESENT

.

NOTPRESENT

*/\Si/^ .îs'^tX^^tX'

LOCATION CONDITION

MATERIAL TYPE(SURFACING MATERIAL)

Spray-On InsulationSpray-On TextureSpray-On FireproofingSpray-On AcousticalTroweled-On TextureOthers:

PRESENT

v^

NOTPRESENT

^

^îS^

LOCATION

7rt/r&L4<r)OL4JJ

CONDITION

Sif>t» rJ

MATERIAL TYPE(Miscellaneous Materials)

Baseboard (Wall Cover)Baseboard AdhesiveCarpet AdhesiveBoard MaterialBrick/Morter MaterialCement PipeCloth Texture Material

PRESENT

^

v^

*/

NOTPRESENT

v^

V^

_X

/

y,s

LOCATION

O-M-Kf*

TksVL.tj'kai-i'

CONDITION

(ÔftfJ

•• '--'-

SUSPECT ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL (ACM) CHECKLIST(Continued)

Project Number:

Location:

Date: Page 2 of 2

Inspector


Cement SheetCeiling TileCeiling Tile AdhesiveDuct Sealant MaterialDrywallDrywall Joint TapeDrywall Joint CompoundElevator Brake PadsExpansion MaterialFiberglass AdhesiveFire Door MaterialFloor Leveler CompoundFloor TileFloor Tile AdhesiveHardboardLay-In Ceiling PanelsLight Weight ConcreteLinoleum FlooringLinoleum Floor AdhesiveLoose Fill InsulationMisc. AdhesivePacking/Gasket MaterialPaper MaterialReinforced PlasticFinish Wall PlasterBase Wall PlasterFinish Ceiling PlasterBase Ceiling PlasterPlaster Patch CompoundRoof Sealant/TarRoof InsulationRoofing ShinglesRubber Floor AdhesiveSheet Vinyl ProductSuspect PaintTerrazzo FlooringVibration ClothWall CoveringOther

PRESENT

S

\/\S!/

</SSSS

*/

sJ</.y

_x

*/

— .. . _ ._. .

NOTPRESENT

^^s

I/sS

ssI/</iS.^S^^

<^^"^vxx'.

îs^

LOCATION

Sarvnn 6t*a t~r ///*/<cs

/nsoi'<*rit}i*7£Xl£ jfilfJtftS &rc*<

kfrtJt/A) *»J Ft.** of K&-k^

/h/~ot+s hot*/

TL,/-6t*<Ltioi*~tf

/hra "i *, hoi* 1"

Sou."/ A f*iJS««HÂ ^<^«yaft/tf<"Jkro^tf h€>i*~l >CcoT

x

/n/"o<-* »j/<G L^/J

-.-.. :.•..--•---- '.:- - - . . — • • - . - — --^-~

CONDITION

f->fiOlf

fZ.S

C~r* f-> tA

^.X

<ôr.«y6o« f/

<Goac/

<^««>^>Oor7<^>O(OOl

(std&d

<L**r«J

... - ——— :...-

SUSPECT ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL (ACM) CHECKLIST

O3/0//piProject Number: /g^xa^.Oi W Date: A,3/^9/ax-

/ /

Location: &Hi/Jff»±/A\>/^\ . A/^ ______ Inspector:,

Page 1 of 2

MATERIALTYPE

VermiculiteInsulation

SUSPECTED(Y/N)

-¥—MATERIAL TYPE

(THERMAL SYSTEMS (TSI))Boiler InsulationDuct InsulationDucting PipeElectrical InsulationFurnace InsulationMudded Pipe JointsPipe InsulationPipe Thread CompoundRefractory MaterialTank/Vessel InsulationThermal PaperOthers:

VERIFIED(Y/N)

-^-PRESENT

SAMPLED(Y/N)

iNOT

PRESENT./^^^

^^^

l/^t/t^S'<^/^^J^^w^^

t^*

LOCATIONl^U>IC/<A/'<j ^*^|

p i i f

x' r i . .fvs **i£,rta*rc /*/ »••"<. toLt*'no*'

LOCATION ' CONDITION

MATERIAL TYPE(SURFACING MATERIAL)

Spray-On InsulationSpray-On TextureSpray-On FireproofingSpray-On AcousticalTroweled-On TextureOthers:

PRESENT NOTPRESENT

— i --*'.---*-"'^^

LOCATION CONDITION


Baseboard (Wall Cover)Baseboard AdhesiveCarpet AdhesiveBoard MaterialBrick/Morter MaterialCement-PipeCloth Texture Material

PRESENT

Xs

NOTPRESENT

•**"4-*"

^

« *"

^

LOCATION

&iil/C4ir«L ^

CP^ rAT/«e» f *A]~ J / *• f * •*"

CONDITION

/^^60 .- *^

SUSPECT ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL (ACM) CHECKLIST(Continued)

Project Number.

Location:

Date: / f l i / g Page 2 of 2

Inspector


Cement SheetCeiling TileCeiling Tile AdhesiveDuct Sealant MaterialDrywallDrywall Joint TapeDrywall Joint CompoundElevator Brake PadsExpansion MaterialFiberglass AdhesiveFire Door MaterialFloor Leveler CompoundFloor TileFloor Tile AdhesiveHardboardLay-In Ceiling PanelsLight Weight ConcreteLinoleum FlooringLinoleum Floor AdhesiveLoose Fill InsulationMisc. AdhesivePacking/Gasket MaterialPaper MaterialReinforced PlasticFinish Wall PlasterBase Wall PlasterFinish Ceiling PlasterBase Ceiling PlasterPlaster Patch CompoundRoof Sealant/TarRoof InsulationRoofing ShinglesRubber Floor AdhesiveSheet Vinyl ProductSuspect PaintTerrazzo FlooringVibration ClothWall CoveringOther

._ . .._....-_.. . . . . . . _ . . . . . .

PRESENT NOTPRESENT^^^^t^^^^^^^»/^^</*stSisS^s^.^^*/^^iSL^S

L^

IS^

L^-^^i^*-

t^^

t^^S~S^

LOCATION

-. —

CONDITION

... — . ——— _. . . _ , _ _ — .

Final focused removal assessment rpt - Libby sister sites ... · Hawaii Staging &...

Documents

Transcript of Final focused removal assessment rpt - Libby sister sites ... · Hawaii Staging &...