Final Asbestos-Containing Material Survey Update St. Louis U ...Final ACM Survey Update St. Louis...

Final

Asbestos-Containing Material Survey Update St. Louis U.S. Army Reserve Center No. 2 (MO029)

St. Louis, Missouri

Contract No. W912QR-12-D-0027 Delivery Order Number 0004

Prepared for:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Louisville District

Prepared by:

222 Valley Creek Blvd., Suite 210 Exton, PA 19341

and

135 S. 84th Street, Suite 400

Milwaukee, WI 53214

July 2013

Final ACM Survey Update St. Louis USARC No. 2 (MO029)

St. Louis, MO July 2013

ii

STATEMENT OF INDEPENDENT TECHNICAL REVIEW

CH2M HILL and ALLIANT Corporation have prepared the Final Asbestos-Containing Material Survey Update for the Saint Louis U.S. Army Reserve Center No. 2 (MO029) Saint Louis, Missouri

Notice is hereby given that an independent technical review has been conducted that is appropriate to the level of risk and complexity inherent in the project. During the independent technical review, compliance with established policy principles and procedures, utilizing justified and valid assumptions, was verified. This included review of data quality objectives; technical assumptions; methods, procedures, and materials to be used; the appropriateness of data used and level of data obtained; and reasonableness of the results, including whether the product meets the customer’s needs consistent with law and existing U.S. Army Corps policy.

Significant concerns and explanation of the resolutions are documented within the project file. As noted above, all concerns resulting from independent technical review of the project have been considered.

____________________ Date: 18 July 2013 Paul Shipp Technical Manager Alliant Corporation

____________________ Date: 18 July 2013 Colleen Reilly Independent Technical Review Team Leader CH2M HILL

paulshipp

My Signature



iii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Under contract with TerranearPMC, CH2M HILL retained Alliant Corporation (ALLIANT) to conduct an asbestos-containing material (ACM) survey update at the St. Louis U.S. Army Reserve Center (USARC) No. 2 (MO029) in St. Louis, Missouri. The survey update was conducted for the U.S. Army Reserve 88th Regional Support Command (RSC) under contract with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Louisville District. This survey is an update of a previous survey conducted at the site in June 2008 by SCS Engineers.

The USARC is located at 4100 Goodfellow Boulevard, St. Louis, Missouri 63120. Improvements on the property consist of an approximate 33,568 square-foot, single-story structure with a partial basement constructed of cast-in-place concrete, steel, and block. The facility functioned as a USARC administrative and training facility since 1965.

The purpose of the survey was to provide updated information regarding the presence, condition, and estimated quantity of previously identified (either confirmed or assumed) ACMs located at the facility. The field inspection was conducted on 21 March 2013. In accordance with the project’s scope of work, no samples were collected by ALLIANT during this survey update.

Confirmed ACMs The following ACMs were confirmed during the 2008 ACM survey and were observed as being in the same areas by ALLIANT during the survey update:

Yellow mastic under non-ACM beige floor tile (only floor tile mastic is ACM) Surfacing material, wall texture with beige paint1 Exterior gray caulk.

Assumed ACMs The following suspect materials were not identified in the 2008 ACM survey report, however, were suspect ACMs observed by ALLIANT during the survey update. These materials are assumed ACMs, until they can be sampled:

Column covers (inserted to column web to create a smooth look throughout)

Plaster (front halls, front rooms, restrooms, auditorium and more)

Texture on plaster

Texture on additional block walls (this is similar to texture identified during the 2008 survey; however, in additional locations than was observed in the 2008 survey)

Faux wood linoleum (located over sink in basement)

Fire doors

Insulation batting

1 ALLIANT observed that this surfacing material may have been removed, however, sampling will be required to confirm successful abatement of the ACM.



iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. iii

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................... v

1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1

2.0 APPROACH ....................................................................................................................... 1

2.1 Information Sources ...................................................................................................... 1

2.2 Limitations ..................................................................................................................... 1

3.0 SITE INFORMATION ......................................................................................................... 2

3.1 Facility Name and Location .......................................................................................... 2

3.2 Facility Manager/Point of Contacts ............................................................................... 2

3.3 Date of Inspection ......................................................................................................... 2

4.0 ASBESTOS INSPECTION ................................................................................................. 2

4.1 Methods ........................................................................................................................ 2

4.2 Interviews ...................................................................................................................... 3

4.3 Inspection Results ........................................................................................................ 3

5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................................................... 4

6.0 INSPECTOR’S SIGNATURE ............................................................................................. 4

7.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................... 5

7.1 Federal .......................................................................................................................... 5

7.2 U.S. Army ..................................................................................................................... 5

7.3 Other ............................................................................................................................. 5

APPENDICES

Appendix A Previous ACM Survey Report Appendix B Tables Appendix C Figures Appendix D Photograph Log Appendix E Inspector’s Certification



v

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

ACBM asbestos-containing building material ACM asbestos-containing material AHERA Asbestos Hazard and Emergency Response Act of 1986 HA homogeneous area NESHAP National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants POC Point of Contact RSC Regional Support Command USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers USARC United States Army Reserve Center USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency



Page 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Alliant Corporation (ALLIANT) was retained by CH2M HILL, under contract with TerranearPMC, LLC to conduct an asbestos survey update for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Louisville District and the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) 88th Regional Support Command (RSC) at the St. Louis U.S. Army Reserve (USARC) Number 2 (MO029). The USARC is an approximately 33,568 square foot administrative and training facility located at 4100 Goodfellow Boulevard, St Louis, Missouri.

The scope of services for this project consisted of conducting an update of a prior asbestos survey, including inspection, current condition assessment, and quantification of accessible previously identified (either confirmed or assumed) asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) from interior and exterior components of all structures at the facility. No sampling or analysis was conducted within the scope of this survey update. The previous survey was conducted at the site in June 2008 by SCS Engineers. A copy of the previous survey report is included in Appendix A.

2.0 APPROACH The survey update was conducted in accordance with the Final Work Plan Environmental Property Disposal Documentation for the 81, 88, and 99 RSCs and PR Non-BRAC Sites (Work Plan) (TerranearPMC, 2013) and included:

Document review – ALLIANT personnel reviewed the June 2008 asbestos survey report by SCS Engineers.

Asbestos Inspection – ALLIANT personnel inspected all interior and exterior building areas at the facility.

Condition assessment – ALLIANT personnel assessed the condition of suspect homogeneous areas (HAs) at the facility.

Photographic log - A photographic record of the HAs inspected was maintained.

Interview – ALLIANT personnel interviewed site personnel.

2.1 Information Sources

Alliant conducted interviews to gather information regarding current facility condition, including facility construction, maintenance, and management history. Previous inspection reports provided by the 88th RSC for the facility were reviewed and are included as Appendix A. The Point(s) of Contact are listed in Section 3.2 Facility Manager/Points of Contact.

2.2 Limitations

Although this study attempts to confirm the presence of ACM, either previously identified or unidentified, it is possible that some suspect ACM escaped detection due to the limitations of the study, the inaccuracy of available data sources, location inaccessibility, and/or the limited knowledge of site personnel. Additionally, the roof was not accessible and therefore materials on the roof were not assessed.



Page 2

3.0 SITE INFORMATION

3.1 Facility Name and Location

Facility ID: MO029 Saint Louis U.S. Army Reserve Center Facility Address: 4100 Goodfellow Blvd., St. Louis, Missouri 63120

3.2 Facility Manager/Point of Contacts

Area Facility Operations Specialist Name: Paul McAfee Phone: 309-301-0298

88th RSC Environmental Protection Specialist

Name: Lisa Gulbranson Phone: 612-713-3752 Email: [email protected]

Inspector, Contractor and Contact Information

Inspector: Tim DesJardins Contractor: Alliant Corporation Address: 320 North Cedar Bluff Road, Suite 200 Knoxville, Tennessee 37923-4524 Phone: 865-934-2222 Fax: 865-769-0946 Email: [email protected]

The Inspector’s Certification is provided in Appendix E.

3.3 Date of Inspection

Begin Date: 03/21/2013 End Date: 03/21/2013

4.0 ASBESTOS INSPECTION

4.1 Methods

Asbestos inspection procedures were performed in accordance with the approved Work Plan.

The HAs were determined by conducting an initial building walkthrough to assess materials that were visually similar in color, texture, general appearance, and date of installation. If the inspector decided that a material in an HA was not similar in appearance and texture to other materials in the building, then the material was considered a new material and assumed to be asbestos-containing. Following the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) inspection protocols, the inspector placed each identified suspect ACM into one of the following USEPA classifications:

Friable ACM. National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) defines a friable ACM as any material containing greater than 1 percent asbestos, which, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure.



Page 3

Category I Non-friable ACM. NESHAP defines a Category I non-friable ACM as packing, gaskets, resilient floor covering (except vinyl sheet flooring products where are considered friable), and asphalt roofing products that contain greater than 1 percent asbestos.

Category II Non-friable ACM. NESHAP defines a Category II non-friable ACM as any material, except for a Category I non-friable ACM that contains greater than 1 percent asbestos and cannot be reduced to a powder by hand pressure when dry.

Suspect ACM were assessed for their general condition, using the terms “Good”, “Damaged”, or “Significantly Damaged”. Good condition is defined as a material that is not damaged and/or largely intact. Damaged is defined as a material that is less than 25 percent localized damage or less than 10% distributed damage. Significantly Damaged is defined as any material that is greater than 25 percent damaged or greater than 10% distributed damage.

The inspector estimated the quantity of suspect ACM using visual estimation. This visual estimation was conducted using facility drawings, pacing, and counting tiles or panels rather than measured take-offs. As a result, actual quantities may differ from visually estimated values. The estimated quantities for each asbestos-containing building material (ACBM) are listed on Table 1 in Appendix B.

4.2 Interviews

The POCs identified in Section 3.2 were interviewed. The POCs were questioned on site-specific information including facility construction, maintenance, and management history. The Area Facility Operations Specialist, Paul McAfee, could not confirm the date of construction but was able to confirm that the information provided in the previous ACM investigation was accurate. It was confirmed through the interview and direct observation that the facility was concrete slab-on-grade with primarily 12-inch x 12-inch floor tiles. The building has a small basement and, according to Mr. McAfee, may have return air plenums below the floors. The low, flat roof was supported by precast concrete decking. The walls were primarily cinder block construction with large windows in the front of the facility and the exterior is brick. The air conditioning is forced ventilation and the facility is supplied with natural gas. City water and sewer are servicing the building.

Based on review of the previous ACM report conducted by SCS Engineers, interior tile mastic, wall texture, and exterior caulking were found to contain asbestos. The recommended management of asbestos-in-place as proposed by SCS Engineers was understood by site personnel. According to Mr. McAfee, the materials were being maintained and the utilities to the building are intact in order to maintain properly conditioned air which was confirmed by the on-site inspector.

4.3 Inspection Results

The previously identified ACMs observed during the survey update are in the same condition and in the same locations as was noted in the 2008 survey report, except that the beige texture paint on the block walls in room 125 appears to have been abated. Until samples are taken to confirm, this should be considered ACM.

Table 1 in Appendix B includes a summary of ACMs identified in the 2008 survey and observed during the survey update, including their current condition and quantities. Figure 1 in Appendix C shows the location of the previously identified ACMs observed during the survey update. The photographs taken during the current inspection are included in Appendix D.

Final ACM Survey Update St. Louis USARC No. 2 (M0029)


The following suspect materials were not identified in the 2008 ACM survey report, however, were suspect ACMs observed by ALLIANT during the survey update. These materials are assumed ACMs, until they can be sampled:

• Column covers in the back hallway, near the fixed ladder roof access. These are a strip of drywall clad with metal inserted into the column web to create a smooth look throughout. There are at least three of these column covers.

• Plaster (front halls, lobby, front rooms, restrooms, auditorium and other areas). There are at least 9000 square feet of this plaster.

• Texture on plaster walls of the auditorium and adjacent hallway. There are at least 2000 square feet of this wall texture.

• Texture on additional block walls (this is similar to texture identified during the 2008 survey; however, during the survey update, this material was found in additional locations, including rooms 129, 126, 128 and adjacent rooms) . There are at least 2000 square feet of this wall texture.

• Faux wood linoleum (located over sink in basement). There are approximately 18 square feet of this linoleum.

• Fire doors. 24 fire doors were observed in the basement; more fire doors are likely present, but were not readily identifiable during the survey update.

• Insulation batting above chicken wire. There are at least 2000 square feet of this insulation batting.

5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the materials observed during the survey update, and on the previous asbestos survey report, the following recommendations are provided:

• Implement a regular maintenance schedule that includes a visual inspection of the material condition . Removal is not necessary because the ACMs do not appear to have the potential of becoming friable during normal day-to-day activities conducted within the building .

• If ACMs are removed , removal should be conducted in compliance with local, state, and federal applicable standards, using appropriate protocols and properly licensed and certified asbestos abatement contractors.

6.0 INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE This ACM survey update was conducted by an AHERA-certified asbestos inspector. A copy of the inspector's certification is included in Appendix E. In compliance with the approved Work Plan , every effort was made to confirm the previously identified ACBM in the facility. The possibility always exists that some ACBM remains unidentified. The information presented in the report is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge:

Z-18 ---20 1s3 Date

Page 4



Page 5

7.0 REFERENCES

7.1 Federal

40 CFR Part 763, Asbestos-Containing Materials in Schools; Subpart E, Final Rule; 52 FR 41846, October 30, 1987

U.S. EPA, Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) AHERA 3,5,7 Rule

U.S. EPA, Guidance for Controlling Asbestos-Containing Building Materials, 560/5-85-024, June 1985

U.S. EPA, Managing Asbestos in Place, 20T-2003, July 1990

7.2 U.S. Army

AR 200-1, Environmental Protection and Enhancement, Paragraph 8.2.h

AR 420-1, Facilities Engineering, Buildings and Structures, Paragraph 3-3

Department of the Army, Public Works Technical Bulletin (PWTB) 420-70-8, Installation Asbestos Management Program, (http://www.hnd.usace.army.mil/)

7.3 Other

SCS Engineers. 2008. Asbestos Survey U.S. Army Reserve Center St. Louis, Missouri MO029. June.

TerranearPMC, LLC. 2013. Final Work Plan, Environmental Property Disposal Documentation for the 81, 88, 99 RSCs and PR Non-BRAC Sites. January.

APPENDIX A 1

Previous ACM Survey Report2

Asbes tos Survey U .S . Army Reserve Cen ter

S t . Lou i s , Mi s sour i MO029

Presented to:

S & A E n v i r o n m e n t a l T u l s a D i s t r i c t U . S . A r m y C o r p s o f E n g i n e e r s

f o r t h e 8 9 T H R E G I O N A L R E A D I N E S S C O M M A N D

3130 George Washington Boulevard Wichita, Kansas 67210-1598

Presented by:

S C S E N G I N E E R S 10975 El Monte

Overland Park, KS (913) 451-7510

June 2008 File No. 08207024.03

Offices Nationwide www.scsengineers.com

A s b e s t o s S u r v e y — S t . L o u i s , M O

0 8 2 0 7 0 2 4 . 0 3 i J u n e 2 0 0 8

T a b l e o f C o n t e n t s Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 1-1

1.1 Purpose of the MO029 Asbestos Survey ............................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Project Background .................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.3 Facility Description ................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Previous Surveys and Reports ............................................................................................... 1-2 1.5 Contents of the Investigation Report .................................................................................... 1-2

2.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY PROCEDURES ................................................................................................. 2-1

2.1 Visual Survey ............................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.2 Sample Protocol ....................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Numbering ................................................................................................................................. 2-2

3.0 MO029 ASBESTOS SURVEY ........................................................................................................... 3-1

3.1 Summary of MO029 Asbestos Surveys ............................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Survey of Building 1 USARC .................................................................................................. 3-1 3.3 ACM Comments ........................................................................................................................ 3-3

3.3.1 Building 1 .................................................................................................................. 3-3

3.4 Damage/Risk Potential and Exposure Potential Assessment ............................................ 3-3

4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................... 4-1

L i s t o f T a b l e s

No. Page 1 Summary of Survey at MO029 3-1 2 Asbestos Sample Summary: Building 1 3-1 3 ACM Damage and Exposure Assessment: Building 1 3-4 4 Recommended Corrective Actions 3-4 A p p e n d i c e s A Sample Location Drawings B Damage/Exposure Assessments and Matrix C Survey Photographic Log D Laboratory Data Reports E Inspector Certifications

I n t r o d u c t i o n

0 8 2 0 7 0 2 4 . 0 3 1 - 1 J u n e 2 0 0 8

1 .0 INTRODUCT ION

SCS Engineers (SCS) was contracted by our client, S&A Environmental Consultants [for the 89th Regional Readiness Command (RRC)], to perform asbestos surveys at multiple facilities in Kansas, Missouri and Nebraska. The work is being performed by SCS as a subcontractor to S&A under Contract No. W912BV-07-D-2011 Task Order No. 2, 3, 4 with the Tulsa District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This report presents the results of the survey conducted at the U.S. Army Reserve Center (USARC) in St. Louis, Missouri, (subsequently referred to by the facility number MO029). Unless otherwise noted, the survey was conducted as specified in the Asbestos Survey Plan prepared by SCS, December 2007. 1 . 1 P U R P O S E O F T H E M O 0 2 9 A S B E S T O S S U R V E Y

The 89th RRC requires a comprehensive asbestos survey to study existing conditions and recommend future projects to bring all facilities into compliance with AR 200-1 Chapter 9, and AR 420-1. The intent of the survey is to identify suspect asbestos containing material (SACM), sample and analyze the materials to determine asbestos content, identify locations in the building where ACM is present, estimate the type and quantity of ACM at each location, and develop an operation and maintenance plan.

1 . 2 P R O J E C T B A C K G R O U N D

The 89th RRC is responsible for many facilities constructed prior to 1980; therefore, it is likely that these facilities were constructed using asbestos containing building materials. Various 89th USARC facilities have previously been inspected for asbestos and some removal activities performed. However, the previous removal projects may have failed to leave comprehensive reports of these removals. Asbestos containing materials may still be present at these facilities. There is a known link between the inhalation of asbestos fibers and various diseases such as asbestosis, mesothelioma, lung and other cancers. As a result, the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act [AHERA, 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 763] was enacted in 1986, specifically to address asbestos in schools. An AHERA inspection requires an accredited inspector to visually inspect and assess the condition of all known or assumed friable asbestos-containing building materials (ACBM); to visually inspect non-friable ACM and touch it to determine friability; and to identify homogeneous areas of friable materials. The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) require thorough inspections for asbestos in structures before renovation or demolition. Army regulation (AR) 200-1, Environmental Protection and Enhancement, Section 9.2 states “Army installations will perform an exposure assessment and risk assessment for all locations containing asbestos.” AR420-70, Facilities Engineering, Buildings and Structures, Section II (Asbestos Hazard Management) outlines the scope of asbestos management to include “surveys to identify the presence and location of ACM and implementation of control actions.”


0 8 2 0 7 0 2 4 . 0 3 1 - 2 J u n e 2 0 0 8

Asbestos surveys were conducted with the intent to identify suspect ACM throughout each building, sample the building materials for laboratory analysis and determine the asbestos content, and provide detailed reports for each facility including photo-logs and drawings. The inspection report is sufficient in scope and detail to provide documentation for maintenance, renovation, demolition and abatement.

1 . 3 F A C I L I T Y D E S C R I P T I O N

The St. Louis #2 Army Reserve Center, located at 4100 Goodfellow Boulevard in St. Louis, Missouri contains one building that was constructed in 1965. The building is one-story with a partial concrete basement. The building is brick and concrete block with a flat built-up roof. The building contains 33,568 square feet, and heating for the building is supplied by a forced air system.

1 . 4 P R E V I O U S S U R V E Y S A N D R E P O R T S

The following documents were provided by the 89th RRC for SCS review:

Prioritization Asbestos Assessment Study U.S. Army Reserve Centers Missouri and Southern Illinois prepared by Hall-Kimbrell Environmental Services, Inc. dated December 6, 1988. The building was being renovation at the time of the assessment. Hall-Kimbrell identified eight ACM’s in the building. Thermal system insulation, wrapped cardboard pipe covering, and mudded joint fittings, were found in generally good condition. Hall-Kimbrell recommended that any of the piping insulation that would be modified during the renovation process be removed and damaged areas should be repaired. Hall-Kimbrell also recommended that debris identified in the tunnel system be removed. Hot water tank insulation and breeching insulation were found in good condition and Hall-Kimbrell recommended they and all other piping insulation be monitored under an Operation and Maintenance Plan until removal. Wallboard was found in good condition, and it was recommended it be monitored for changes in condition and placed under an Operations and Maintenance Plan. Vinyl floor tiles were identified at the facility and not considered a threat unless damaged.

At the request of the 89th RRC, and because of the date of the previous survey and the difficulty in correlating material descriptions and locations, the current survey was completed independently and without reference to the previous survey results. 1 . 5 C O N T E N T S O F T H E I N V E S T I G A T I O N R E P O R T

This Investigation Report consists of the following sections:

• Section 1.0, Introduction. This section presents the project purpose and background and the contents of the report.

• Section 2.0, Investigation Procedures. This section describes the survey procedures and approach and details deviations from the Investigation Project Plan.


0 8 2 0 7 0 2 4 . 0 3 1 - 3 J u n e 2 0 0 8

• Section 3.0, Investigation Results. This section presents field observations of friability and laboratory sample results for the samples of homogeneous SACM.

• Section 4.0, Conclusions and Recommendations. This section summarizes the investigation results and makes recommendations for further action.

• Appendix A, Sample Location Drawings.

• Appendix B, Damage/Exposure Assessments and Matrix.

• Appendix C, Survey Photographic Log.

• Appendix D, Laboratory Data Reports.

• Appendix E, Inspector Certifications.

A s b e s t o s S u r v e y P r o c e d u r e s

0 8 2 0 7 0 2 4 . 0 3 2 - 1 J u n e 2 0 0 8

2 .0 ASBESTOS SURVEY PROCEDURES

In compliance with OSHA 29 CFR Part 1910 and the prepared health and safety plan, SCS team members performed an asbestos inspection at MO029, St. Louis, Missouri. The inspection involved a visual survey to identify and evaluate the condition of SACM, estimates of the extent and quantity of SACM, and sampling to confirm and characterize ACM. The facility survey was conducted in accordance with the contract requirements, with the following exception:

• None

2 . 1 V I S U A L S U R V E Y SCS state-certified inspectors conducted a visual survey of all parts of every building at the facility, including interior and exterior walls in all rooms, basements, attics, boiler rooms, furnace rooms, closets, covered walkways, loading docks, crawl spaces under buildings, flooring, roofing, insulation, areas above ceiling, ceilings, and other locations where suspect asbestos materials were present. SCS did not enter permit-required confined spaces or areas where access was prohibited. SACM was grouped into homogeneous material sets. Homogeneous materials are suspect building materials and areas that are uniform by color, texture, construction/application date and general appearance. SCS estimated quantities, condition, and friability of homogeneous materials in linear feet, square feet, or cubic feet on a per building basis. Photographs of each sample of SACM are included in Appendix C. 2 . 2 S A M P L E P R O T O C O L Bulk material sampling was conducted for SACM identified in each building. The samples were at least one cubic centimeter and were placed in a sealed container at the time of collection. Two samples were collected of each homogenous material. Appropriate precautions were taken to prevent exposure to those present in or around the facility during the collection of samples. Care was taken to prevent cross-contamination of the collected samples. Sample locations inside and outside the buildings were restored so that a worse condition was not created after sampling. Roofing materials were only sampled if it could be done without causing damage. Sample collection followed applicable federal and state requirements. The bulk samples were sent to EMLab P&K located in San Bruno, California, a National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) accredited laboratory (NVLAP#200728). There they were analyzed by polarized light microscopy (PLM) with dispersion staining, per EPA Method 500/R-93/116.

A s b e s t o s S u r v e y P r o c e d u r e s

0 8 2 0 7 0 2 4 . 0 3 2 - 2 J u n e 2 0 0 8

2 . 3 N U M B E R I N G

SCS used a three-unit sampling identification number. The first set of digits indicates the facility and building number, the next set indicates the homogenous material group number for the building, and the last set indicates the sample number for that homogenous material. The numbers are unique to all samples and are used as the designation on the chain of custody. Sample locations were identified on building drawings (Appendix A) using the unique sample number assigned.

M O 0 2 9 A s b e s t o s S u r v e y

0 8 2 0 7 0 2 4 . 0 3 3 - 1 J u n e 2 0 0 8

3 .0 MO029 ASBESTOS SURVEY

3 . 1 S U M M A R Y O F M O 0 2 9 A S B E S T O S S U R V E Y S

This inspection report presents the survey results of the building located at facility MO029, St. Louis, Missouri. The survey was conducted on March 20, 2008. The sample locations are shown on the drawings in Appendix A, and laboratory data reports for the SACM samples collected are included in Appendix D. The primary asbestos concern for MO029 appears to be various types of friable and non-friable ACM. The summary of asbestos inspection findings is shown in the following table.

T a b l e 1 . S u m m a r y o f S u r v e y a t M O 0 2 9

MO029 Buildings Friable ACM Identified? Non-friable ACM Identified? USARC (MO029.1) Yes Yes

3 . 2 S U R V E Y O F B U I L D I N G 1 – U S A R C

Building 1 is a one-story brick and concrete block structure consisting of administrative offices and classrooms, assembly hall, and storage areas. The building was constructed in 1965 and has a flat built up-roof system. Heating for the building is supplied by forced air system.

Twenty-six unique building materials were identified during the survey, and 53 samples were collected for analysis. The sample results from Building 1 USARC are summarized in Table 2. Three homogenous materials (HMs) were determined to be greater than one percent ACM, including:

• HM07- Yellow mastic on 12”x12” beige floor tile • HM23- Off-white textured wall material • HM26- Grey exterior door caulk

T a b l e 2 . A s b e s t o s S a m p l e S u m m a r y : B u i l d i n g 1

Sample Number Material Description Asbestos Percent Friable MO029.1-01-01 MO029.1-01-02

Light grey expansion joint compound Light grey expansion joint compound

ND ND

Yes Yes

MO029.1-02-01 MO029.1-02-02

Brown expansion joint compound Brown expansion joint compound

ND ND

Yes Yes

MO029.1-03-01 MO029.1-03-02

Light grey ceiling tile with white paint Light grey ceiling tile with white paint

ND ND

Yes Yes

MO029.1-04-01

Light grey caulk

ND

No

MO029.1-05-01 MO029.1-05-02

Light grey ceiling tile with white paint Light grey ceiling tile with white paint

ND ND

Yes Yes

MO029.1-06-01 MO029.1-06-02

Black wrap with woven material, pink duct insulation Black wrap with woven material, pink duct insulation

ND/ND ND/ND

Yes Yes


0 8 2 0 7 0 2 4 . 0 3 3 - 2 J u n e 2 0 0 8

Sample Number Material Description Asbestos Percent Friable MO029.1-07-01 MO029.1-07-02

Yellow mastic, beige floor tile Yellow mastic, beige floor tile

2% Chrysotile/ND 2% Chrysotile/ND

No No

MO029.1-08-01 MO029.1-08-02

Brown flashing tar Brown flashing tar

ND ND

No No

MO029.1-09-01 MO029.1-09-02

White flashing tar White flashing tar

ND ND

No No

MO029.1-10-01 MO029.1-10-02

Black non-fibrous roof membrane Black non-fibrous roof membrane

ND ND

No No

MO029.1-11-01 MO029.1-11-02

Black roofing tar Black roofing tar

ND ND

No No

MO029.1-12-01 MO029.1-12-02

Brown tile strip Brown tile strip

ND ND

No No

MO029.1-13-01 MO029.1-13-02

Black mastic, tan floor tile Black mastic, tan floor tile

ND/ND ND/ND

No No

MO029.1-14-01 MO029.1-14-02

Light grey tape, off-white drywall, off-white skim coat with beige paint Light grey tape, off-white drywall, off-white skim coat with beige paint

ND/ND/ND

ND/ND/ND

Yes

Yes

MO029.1-15-01 MO029.1-15-02

Yellow mastic, brown baseboard Yellow mastic, brown baseboard

ND/ND ND/ND

No No

MO029.1-16-01 MO029.1-16-02

Black window caulk Black window caulk

ND ND

No No

MO029.1-17-01 MO029.1-17-02

Light grey ceiling tile with silver foil Light grey ceiling tile with silver foil

ND ND

Yes Yes

MO029.1-18-01 MO029.1-18-02

Brown baseboard Brown baseboard

ND ND

No No

MO029.1-19-01 MO029.1-19-02

Brown baseboard Brown baseboard

ND ND

No No

MO029.1-21-01 MO029.1-21-02

Beige floor tile Beige floor tile

ND ND

No No

MO029.1-22-01 MO029.1-22-02

Black baseboard strip Black baseboard strip

ND ND

No No

MO029.1-23-01 MO029.1-23-02

Off-white wall texture with beige paint Off-white wall texture with beige paint

2% Chrysotile 2% Chrysotile

Yes Yes

MO029.1-24-01 MO029.1-24-02

Pipe lagging silver foil with light brown paper, yellow insulation Pipe lagging silver foil with light brown paper, yellow insulation

ND/ND

ND/ND

Yes

Yes

MO029.1-25-01 MO029.1-25-02

White caulk with brown paint White caulk with brown paint

ND ND

No No

MO029.1-26-01 MO029.1-26-02

Exterior grey caulk Exterior grey caulk

8% Chrysotile 8% Chrysotile

No No

MO029.1-27-01 MO029.1-27-02

Exterior black window caulk Exterior black window caulk

ND ND

No No

MO029.1-28-01 MO029.1-28-02

Exterior brown caulk Exterior brown caulk

ND ND

No No

Notes: 1. Asbestos percent is listed for each sample component in the order the components are listed in the sample

description (e.g. tile, mastic: 3% chrysotile/ND, means tile is 3%, mastic is ND). 2. ND Not detected.


0 8 2 0 7 0 2 4 . 0 3 3 - 3 J u n e 2 0 0 8

3 . 3 A C M C O M M E N T S

This section addresses specific ACM identified at each facility building. Comments include a basic description of the material, the typical location or application use of the ACM, and an estimated quantity of ACM present. Photographs of sampled materials are included in Appendix C.

3 . 3 . 1 B u i l d i n g 1

HM07 - Yellow mastic on 12” X 12” beige floor tile (Photo 7): HM07 was identified beneath 12”x12” beige floor tile in Room 106, which was being utilized as office space. The material was identified as non-friable and in good condition. There are between 100 and 1,000 linear feet of this material present.

HM23 – Off-white textured wall material (Photo 33): HM23 was identified on the walls in Room 125, which was being utilized as office and classroom space. The material was identified as friable and in excellent condition. There are between 100 and 1,000 linear feet of this material present.

HM26 – Grey exterior caulk (Photo 39): HM26 was identified between steel door frames and surrounding masonry materials on the exterior portion of the building. The material was identified as non-friable and in good condition. There are more than 1,000 linear feet of this material present.

3 . 4 D A M A G E / R I S K A N D E X P O S U R E P O T E N T I A L A S S E S S M E N T S

During the inspection and sampling of materials, damage/risk potential and exposure potential assessments were also conducted to aid in determining the potential for release of asbestos fibers and the potential for exposure to building occupants and visitors. Damage/risk potential and exposure potential were evaluated with an algorithm obtained from Army guidance document PWTB 420-70-8. Damage/risk potential values range from 1 (low) to 28 (high), and exposure potential values range from 4 (low) to 43 (high). The damage/risk potential and exposure potential values were input into a matrix that provides a corresponding Assessment Index. The matrix is included with the algorithm calculations in Appendix B. The Assessment Index values are utilized to recommend appropriate corrective action. Table 4 identifies Assessment Index values (A through F) and recommended corrective actions. Damage/risk potential and exposure potential assessment checklists were prepared for each ACM, and are located in Appendix B. Damage/risk potential and exposure potential assessment information for ACM identified in Building 1 (USARC) is presented in Table 3.


0 8 2 0 7 0 2 4 . 0 3 3 - 4 J u n e 2 0 0 8

T a b l e 3 . A C M D a m a g e a n d E x p o s u r e A s s e s s m e n t : B u i l d i n g 1

HM# Damage/Risk Potential Exposure Potential Assessment Index HM07 1 7 F HM23 5 14 C HM26 1 7 F

Table 4 details the recommended corrective actions associated with each Assessment Index value. Table 4 was obtained from Army guidance document PWTB 420-70-8.

T a b l e 4 . R e c o m m e n d e d C o r r e c t i v e A c t i o n s

Assessment Index Recommended Corrective Actions

A Requires assessment by certified personnel (in-house or contractor) who are experienced in and qualified to conduct asbestos assessments. Possible follow-up actions may include isolation of the area and the restriction of access and/or immediate removal of the ACM. If the removal is indicated, action planning should include a detailed survey. This condition will likely involve a near term expenditure of funds. Managers must know exactly what needs to be done to eliminate the asbestos hazard and how to use available funds most effectively.

B Requires assessment by certified personnel (in-house or contractor) who are experienced in and qualified to conduct asbestos assessments. Initiate a special O&M program immediately. Possible follow-up actions may include the limiting of access to the area and the scheduling of removal during periods of low activity in the facility, not waiting for the normal repair and maintenance cycle.

C Requires assessment by certified personnel (in-house or contractor) who are experienced in and qualified to program manage. Initiate a special O&M program. Removal should be scheduled as part of the normal repair and maintenance cycle of a facility, minimizing cost and disturbance.

D Initiate special O&M using certified personnel. Damaged areas should be repaired, where repair means returning damaged asbestos-containing building materials (ACBM) to an undamaged condition or to an intact state so as to contain fiber release. Schedule removal when practical and cost effective. Take preventive measures to reduce further damage.

E Continue special O&M using certified personnel. Take steps to prevent damage to the ACBM or other ACM. Frequently monitor the condition of all ACM.

F Continue special O&M using certified personnel until major renovation or demolition requires removal or until assessment factors change.

C o n c l u s i o n s a n d R e c o m m e n d a t i o n s

0 8 2 0 7 0 2 4 . 0 3 4 - 1 J u n e 2 0 0 8

4 .0 CONCLUS IONS AND RECOMMENDAT IONS

ACMs identified in the main building included mastic, wall texture and exterior door caulk.

Damage/risk potential and exposure potential assessments were completed for each homogeneous ACM identified at the facility, per Army guidance document PWTB 420-70-8. Based on the results of the damage/risk potential and exposure potential assessment, Assessment Index C was assigned to HM23. In general, the recommended corrective action for the textured wall material is to initiate a special O&M program, and removal should be scheduled as part of the normal repair and maintenance cycle of a facility, minimizing cost and disturbance. Assessment Index F was assigned to HM07and HM26. In general, the recommended corrective action for the mastic and exterior caulk identified at the site is to continue special O&M using certified personnel until major renovation or demolition requires removal or until assessment factors change.

The mastic, textured wall material and door caulk identified at the site were found in good to excellent condition. The exposure potential for these materials is low unless they or the surrounding materials are damaged or physically altered in a way which would cause them to release fibers.

Building occupants should be informed of the potential asbestos hazard and provided instructions and extra safety measures to be followed in case of an asbestos fiber release episode. All materials should be maintained and monitored by scheduling routine cleaning and periodic inspections until completely removed from the structure. Consult the site-specific Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Plan for additional direction regarding in-place management of identified ACMs.

A p p e n d i c e s

A P P E N D I X A

S A M P L E L O C A T I O N D R A W I N G S

A p p e n d i c e s

A P P E N D I X B

D A M A G E / E X P O S U R E A S S E S S M E N T S A N D M A T R I X

Installation: MO029 Bldg/Rm No: Building 1, Room 106Facility/Office: St. Louis, Missouri Inspector Name: Gracie ShaverSample Number: MO029-07-01 & 02 Sample Description: Yellow mastic

Physical. Assess damage based on evidence of surface accumulation; or the condition of the sprayed-on or troweled-on surface materials; or physical deterioration or delamination of materials using hand pressure.

0 None (0) *Non-asbestos materials; or no damage or evidence of material fallout; ormaterial is in fair to good condition; or nonfriable ACM, (i.e., floor tile, wall board, etc); or (ACM) with less than one percent.

Minimal (1) *Isolated and very small areas (less than 10 percent) of the material damageor fallout; or controlled space and accessed by maintenance personnelonly; or uncontrolled/unoccupied space.

Low (2) *Visible evidence of some surface accumulation; or controlled space and accessed by maintenance personnel only; or uncontrolled/unoccupiedspace.

Moderate (3) *Visible evidence of small areas (less than 10 percent) of surfaceaccumulation; or controlled space and accessed by maintenance personnelonly; or uncontrolled/unoccupied space.

High (5) *Visible evidence of widespread surface accumulation; or uncontrolled space and easily accessed by occupants.

Water.

0 None (0) No water damage.

Minor (1) Visible water damage (less than 10 percent) of ACM.

Major (2) Visible water damage (greater than 10 percent) of ACM.

Proximity to items for repair. If both A and B apply, score the one with the highest rating. (Check all that apply. Maximum of 3 points.)

A. Sprayed-on or troweled-on. Could the friable ACM be damaged by routine maintenance activities?

0 0 No routine maintenance is performed within the areas.

1 Equal to or greater than five feet.

2 Equal to or greater than one foot but less than five feet.

3 Less than one foot from routine maintenance areas or a ceiling panelcontaminated with ACM must be removed.

B. Pipe, boiler, or duct insulation. Could damage occur as a result of routine maintenance orby occupants of building.

0 0 No.

3 Yes.

*Note: If any one or a combination of these criteria are met, assign the corresponding value and

line out the criteria that do not apply.

Part I: Damage Assessment

Type of ACM.

0 0 *Non-asbestos materials; or nonfriable ACM, (i.e. floor tile, wallboard, etc.)in good to fair condition; or ACM with less than one percent.

1 Miscellaneous ACM (i.e. ceiling tiles, etc.).

1 *Boiler; or pipe insulation; or other ACM insulation materials (notaccessible to occupants).

2 Nonfriable ACM (i.e., floor tile, wall board, etc.) in poor condition.

2 *Boiler; or pipe insulation; or other ACM insulation materials (accessible to occupants).

3 *ACM on exterior supply of ducts; or capable of being introduced into air ducts (i.e. deteriorated ACM located in area of air ducts; or above suspended ceilings).

4 *Sprayed-on; or troweled-on surface ACM (accessible to occupants).

Percent asbestos.

0 Less than one percent ACM.

1 1 One to 30 percent ACM.

2 31 to 50 percent ACM.

3 Greater than 50 percent ACM.

Note: If the percent asbestos content is less than one percent or nonfriable asbestos (in good to fair

condition then the total for percent asbestos category will be zero (0).

DAMAGE (D) TOTAL (Max 20, Min 0)



1

Material friability. USEPA definition: hand pressure can crumble, pulverize, or reduce to powder when dry.

0 Nonfriable (0) Material (i.e., floor tile, wall board, binder's, etc.) in good to fair condition.

Low Friability (1) Material difficult to crumble by hand.

Moderate Friability (2) Material fairly easy to dislodge and crush.

High Friability (3) Material easily reduces to powder; or broken by hand.

Occupant accessibility to ACM fibers.

0 Low Accessibility (0) *Materials are not exposed; or totally isolated by permanent barrier; or accessible only during infrequent, occasional maintenance activity; or no air flow from the friable insulating material location to occupants of the building, or storage areas.

Moderate Accessibility (1) *Only a small percent of material exposed; or material above asuspended ceiling; or material contacted during maintenance or repair; or material exposed, but not accessible to activity of normal occupants.

High Accessibility (4) *A large percent of material exposed; or material accessible to occupants; or airborne transport during normal activities.

Activity/use.

None (0) No activity/storage activities.

Low (1) Infrequent maintenance activities only.

Moderate (2) Frequent maintenance activities only.

3 High (3) Normal occupant activities.

Air stream/plenum.

0 None (0) No perceptible air flow in the room or area.

Present (1) Air flow and no evidence of ACM present.

Present (2) ACM is exposed to perceptible or occasional air streams.

Present (3) *Air flow and evidence of ACM present in supply ducts/plenum; or recirculated; or subjected to routine turbulence; or abrupt air movement.

*Note: If any one or a combination of these criteria are met assign the corresponding value and line out the

criteria that does not apply.

Part II: Exposure Assessment

Area of visible surface or damaged ACM.

0 Less than 10 cubic or linear feet (small areas should be repaired as soon as possible).

1 10 to 100 cubic or linear feet.

2 2 100 to 1000 cubic or linear feet.

3 Greater than 1000 cubic or linear feet.

For occupied facilities only.

Population. This involves defining average occupancy as the total number of building occupants and outsidevisitor traffic into a room or area during an eight hour period. For example, a reception area in a DEH shop hasone person assigned to the area. There are 15 individuals (including the receptionist) assigned to the building.They have approximately 240 customers (visitors) in the building during an eight hour period. On average,each customer (visitor) is serviced and departs the building within 30 minutes.

(outside visitors x time spent/8 hours) in area/room + building occupants - average occupancy

Example: ([240 visitors x 0.5 hours]/ 8 hours) + 15 occupants=30. ………….Score as 2.

1 Less than nine or for corridors.

2 2 10 to 200.

3 210 to 500.

4 500 to 1000.

5 Greater than 1000.

5 Medical facilities, youth centers, child care facilities, or residential buildings,regardless of the population, will be assigned to this category.

For unoccupied facilities only.

0 No ACM or less than one percent.

1 Nonfriable ACM in good condition or fair condition.

2 Nonfriable ACM in poor condition.

3 Friable ACM in good condition.

5 Friable ACM with visible evidence of damage.

EXPOSURE (E) TOTAL (Max 26, Min 0)

Note: Provide any other relevant information on observations in the space provided below. If additional space

is needed attach additional pages as necessary.

7

Installation: MO029 Bldg/Rm No: Building 1, Room 125Facility/Office: St. Louis, Missouri Inspector Name: Gracie ShaverSample Number: MO029-23-01 & 02 Sample Description: Off-white wall texture







Water.











0 0 No.

3 Yes.




Type of ACM.

0 *Non-asbestos materials; or nonfriable ACM, (i.e. floor tile, wallboard, etc.)in good to fair condition; or ACM with less than one percent.






4 4 *Sprayed-on; or troweled-on surface ACM (accessible to occupants).

Percent asbestos.










5


Nonfriable (0) Material (i.e., floor tile, wall board, binder's, etc.) in good to fair condition.

1 Low Friability (1) Material difficult to crumble by hand.




Low Accessibility (0) *Materials are not exposed; or totally isolated by permanent barrier; or accessible only during infrequent, occasional maintenance activity; or no air flow from the friable insulating material location to occupants of the building, or storage areas.

Moderate Accessibility (1) *Only a small percent of material exposed; or material above asuspended ceiling; or material contacted during maintenance or repair; or material exposed, but not accessible to activity of normal occupants.

4 High Accessibility (4) *A large percent of material exposed; or material accessible to occupants; or airborne transport during normal activities.

Activity/use.

None (0) No activity/storage activities.



3 High (3) Normal occupant activities.

Air stream/plenum.

None (0) No perceptible air flow in the room or area.


2 Present (2) ACM is exposed to perceptible or occasional air streams.








2 2 100 to 1000 cubic or linear feet.

3 Greater than 1000 cubic or linear feet.





1 Less than nine or for corridors.

2 2 10 to 200.

3 210 to 500.

4 500 to 1000.












14

Installation: MO029 Bldg/Rm No: Building 1, ExteriorFacility/Office: St. Louis, Missouri Inspector Name: Gracie ShaverSample Number: MO029-26-01 & 02 Sample Description: Grey caulk







Water.











0 0 No.

3 Yes.




Type of ACM.

0 0 *Non-asbestos materials; or nonfriable ACM, (i.e. floor tile, wallboard, etc.)in good to fair condition; or ACM with less than one percent.






4 *Sprayed-on; or troweled-on surface ACM (accessible to occupants).

Percent asbestos.










1


0 Nonfriable (0) Material (i.e., floor tile, wall board, binder's, etc.) in good to fair condition.

Low Friability (1) Material difficult to crumble by hand.




Low Accessibility (0) *Materials are not exposed; or totally isolated by permanent barrier; or accessible only during infrequent, occasional maintenance activity; or no air flow from the friable insulating material location to occupants of the building, or storage areas.

1 Moderate Accessibility (1) *Only a small percent of material exposed; or material above asuspended ceiling; or material contacted during maintenance or repair; or material exposed, but not accessible to activity of normal occupants.

High Accessibility (4) *A large percent of material exposed; or material accessible to occupants; or airborne transport during normal activities.

Activity/use.

0 None (0) No activity/storage activities.



High (3) Normal occupant activities.

Air stream/plenum.

None (0) No perceptible air flow in the room or area.


2 Present (2) ACM is exposed to perceptible or occasional air streams.









3 3 Greater than 1000 cubic or linear feet.





1 1 Less than nine or for corridors.

2 10 to 200.

3 210 to 500.

4 500 to 1000.












7

A p p e n d i c e s

A P P E N D I X C

S U R V E Y P H O T O G R A P H I C L O G

08207024.03 St. Louis MO029

Photograph 1. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-01-01: Expansion joint material, white color.

Photograph 2. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-02-01: Expansion joint material, brown color.

08207024.03 St. Louis MO029

Photograph 3. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-02-02: Expansion joint material, brown color.

Photograph 4. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-03-01: Ceiling tile, 2 x 4.

08207024.03 St. Louis MO029

Photograph 5. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-04-01: Caulk, grey color.

Photograph 6. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-05-01: Ceiling tile, 2 x 2.

08207024.03 St. Louis MO029

Photograph 7. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-07-01: Floor tile, white color.

Photograph 8. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-08-01: Flashing tar, brown color.

08207024.03 St. Louis MO029

Photograph 9. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-09-01: Flashing tar, white color.

Photograph 10. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-10-01: Roof membrane.

08207024.03 St. Louis MO029

Photograph 11. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-11-01: Roofing tar, black color.

Photograph 12. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-08-02: Flashing tar, brown color.

08207024.03 St. Louis MO029

Photograph 13. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-09-02: Flashing tar, white color.

Photograph 14. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-10-02: Roof membrane.

08207024.03 St. Louis MO029

Photograph 15. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-11-02: Roofing tar, black color.

Photograph 16. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-12-01: Vinyl tile strip.

08207024.03 St. Louis MO029

Photograph 17. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-13-01: Floor tile, tan color.

Photograph 18. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-15-01: Baseboard, black color.

08207024.03 St. Louis MO029

Photograph 19. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-14-01: Drywall.

Photograph 20. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-16-01: Window caulk.

08207024.03 St. Louis MO029

Photograph 21. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-15-02: Baseboard, black color.

Photograph 22. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-13-02: Floor tile, tan color.

08207024.03 St. Louis MO029

Photograph 23. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-17-01: Ceiling tile.

Photograph 24. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-18-01: Baseboard, brown color.

08207024.03 St. Louis MO029



08207024.03 St. Louis MO029

Photograph 29. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-21-01: Floor tile, grey color.


08207024.03 St. Louis MO029

Photograph 31. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-16-02: Window caulk.

Photograph 32. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-23-01: Wall texture.

08207024.03 St. Louis MO029

Photograph 33. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-23-02: Wall texture.

Photograph 34. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-24-01: Pipe lagging.

08207024.03 St. Louis MO029

Photograph 35. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-24-02: Pipe lagging.

Photograph 36. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-14-02: Drywall.

08207024.03 St. Louis MO029

Photograph 37. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-25-01: Door caulk.

Photograph 38. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-25-02: Door caulk.

08207024.03 St. Louis MO029

Photograph 39. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-26-01: Exterior caulk, grey color.

Photograph 40. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-27-01: Window caulk, black color.

08207024.03 St. Louis MO029

Photograph 41. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-28-01: Exterior caulk, brown color.

Photograph 42. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-28-02: Exterior caulk, brown color.

08207024.03 St. Louis MO029

Photograph 43. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-26-02: Exterior caulk, grey color.

Photograph 44. St. Louis (MO029) Sample 29-27-02: Window caulk, black color.

A p p e n d i c e s

A P P E N D I X D

L A B O R A T O R Y D A T A R E P O R T S

EMLab P&K

Approved by:

Lab ManagerMagzoub Ismail

Report for:

Ms. Gracie ShaverSCS Engineers, Kansas10975 El Monte Suite 100Overland Park, KS 66211

Regarding: Project: 89th RRC; Asbestos SurveyEML ID: 403225

EMLab P&K

This coversheet is included with your report in order to comply with AIHA and ISO accreditation requirements.

For clarity, we report the number of significant digits as calculated; but, due to the nature of this type of biological data, the number of significant digits that is used for interpretation should generally be one or two. All samples were received in acceptable condition unless noted in the Report Comments portion in the body of the report. Due to the nature of the analyses performed, field blank corrections of results is not a standard practice. The results relate only to the items tested.

EMLab P&K ("the Company") shall have no liability to the client or the client's customer with respect to decisions or recommendations made, actions taken or courses of conduct implemented by either the client or the client's customer as a result of or based upon the Test Results. In no event shall the Company be liable to the client with respect to the Test Results except for the Company's own willful misconduct or gross negligence nor shall the Company be liable for incidental or consequential damages or lost profits or revenues to the fullest extent such liability may be disclaimed by law, even if the Company has been advised of the possibility of such damages, lost profits or lost revenues. In no event shall the Company's liability with respect to the Test Results exceed the amount paid to the Company by the client therefor.

Document Number: 200091 - Revision Number: 5

Dates of Analysis:Asbestos-EPA Method 600/R-93/116: 03-28-2008

Project SOPs: Asbestos-EPA Method 600/R-93/116 (100204)

EMLab P&K4401 Atlantic Avenue, Suite 200, Long Beach, CA 90807

(858) 569-5800 Fax (858) 569-5806 www.emlab.comClient: SCS Engineers, KansasC/O: Ms. Gracie ShaverRe: 89th RRC; Asbestos Survey

Date of Sampling: 03-20-2008Date of Receipt: 03-25-2008Date of Report: 03-28-2008

ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116Total Samples Submitted: 53Total Samples Analysed: 53

Total Samples with Layer Asbestos Content > 1%: 6

Location: M0029-01-01, Expansion joint compound Lab ID-Version‡: 1770002-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentLight Gray Compound ND

Composite Non-Asbestos Fibrous Content: 80% CelluloseSample Composite Homogeneity: Poor


Sample Layers Asbestos ContentLight Gray Compound ND

Composite Non-Asbestos Fibrous Content: 80% CelluloseSample Composite Homogeneity: Poor


Sample Layers Asbestos ContentBrown Compound ND

Sample Composite Homogeneity: Poor


Sample Layers Asbestos ContentBrown Compound ND


Location: M0029-03-01, Ceiling tile, 2x4 Lab ID-Version‡: 1770006-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentLight Gray Ceiling Tile with white paint ND

Composite Non-Asbestos Fibrous Content: 50% Cellulose35% Glass Fibers


EMLab ID: 403225, Page 1 of 11

The results relate only to the items tested. Interpretation is left to the company and/or persons who conducted the field work. The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government.

All samples were received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

Inhomogenous samples are seperated into homogenous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed.‡ A "Version" greater than 1 indicates amended data.




ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116Location: M0029-03-02, Ceiling tile, 2x4 Lab ID-Version‡: 1770007-1




Location: M0029-04-01, Caulk, grey Lab ID-Version‡: 1770008-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentLight Gray Caulk ND










Location: M0029-06-01, Duct insulation Lab ID-Version‡: 1770012-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentBlack Wrap with woven material ND

Pink Insulation NDComposite Non-Asbestos Fibrous Content: 80% Glass Fibers

Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate








ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116Location: M0029-06-02, Duct insulation Lab ID-Version‡: 1770013-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentBlack Wrap with woven material ND

Pink Insulation NDComposite Non-Asbestos Fibrous Content: 80% Glass Fibers


Location: M0029-07-01, Floor tile, white Lab ID-Version‡: 1770014-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentYellow Mastic 2% Chrysotile

Beige Floor Tile NDSample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate

Location: M0029-07-02, Floor tile, white Lab ID-Version‡: 1770015-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentYellow Mastic 2% Chrysotile

Beige Floor Tile NDSample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate

Location: M0029-08-01, Flashing tar, brown Lab ID-Version‡: 1770016-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentBrown/Black Tar ND


Location: M0029-08-02, Flashing tar, brown Lab ID-Version‡: 1770017-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentBrown/Black Tar ND









ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116Location: M0029-09-01, White flashing tar Lab ID-Version‡: 1770018-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentWhite Tar ND


Location: M0029-09-02, White flashing tar Lab ID-Version‡: 1770019-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentWhite Tar ND


Location: M0029-10-01, Roof membrane Lab ID-Version‡: 1770020-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentBlack Non-Fibrous Material ND


Location: M0029-10-02, Roof membrane Lab ID-Version‡: 1770021-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentBlack Non-Fibrous Material ND


Location: M0029-11-01, Black roofing tar Lab ID-Version‡: 1770022-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentBlack Roofing Tar ND









ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116Location: M0029-11-02, Black roofing tar Lab ID-Version‡: 1770023-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentBlack Roofing Tar ND


Location: M0029-12-01, Vinyl tile strip Lab ID-Version‡: 1770024-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentBrown/Black Baseboard ND


Location: M0029-12-02, Vinyl tile strip Lab ID-Version‡: 1770025-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentBrown/Black Baseboard ND


Location: M0029-13-01, Floor tile, tan Lab ID-Version‡: 1770026-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentBlack Mastic ND

Tan Floor Tile NDComposite Non-Asbestos Fibrous Content: 10% Cellulose


Location: M0029-13-02, Floor tile, tan Lab ID-Version‡: 1770027-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentBlack Mastic ND

Tan Floor Tile NDComposite Non-Asbestos Fibrous Content: 10% Cellulose









ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116Location: M0029-14-01, Drywall Lab ID-Version‡: 1770028-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentLight Gray Tape ND

Off-White Drywall NDOff-White Skim Coat with beige paint ND

Composite Non-Asbestos Fibrous Content: 20% CelluloseSample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate

Location: M0029-14-02, Drywall Lab ID-Version‡: 1770029-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentLight Gray Tape ND

Off-White Drywall NDOff-White Skim Coat with beige paint ND

Composite Non-Asbestos Fibrous Content: 20% CelluloseSample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate

Location: M0029-15-01, Baseboard, black Lab ID-Version‡: 1770030-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentYellow Mastic ND

Brown Baseboard NDSample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate

Location: M0029-15-02, Baseboard, black Lab ID-Version‡: 1770031-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentYellow Mastic ND

Brown Baseboard NDSample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate








ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116Location: M0029-16-01, Window caulk, black Lab ID-Version‡: 1770032-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentBlack Caulk ND


Location: M0029-16-02, Window caulk, black Lab ID-Version‡: 1770033-1



Location: M0029-17-01, Ceiling tile Lab ID-Version‡: 1770034-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentLight Gray Ceiling Tile with silver foil ND



Location: M0029-17-02, Ceiling tile Lab ID-Version‡: 1770035-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentLight Gray Ceiling Tile with silver foil ND



Location: M0029-18-01, Baseboard, brown Lab ID-Version‡: 1770036-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentBrown Baseboard ND









ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116Location: M0029-18-02, Baseboard, brown Lab ID-Version‡: 1770037-1



Location: M0029-19-01, Baseboard, dark brown Lab ID-Version‡: 1770038-1



Location: M0029-19-02, Baseboard, dark brown Lab ID-Version‡: 1770039-1



Location: M0029-21-01, Floor tile, grey Lab ID-Version‡: 1770040-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentBeige Floor Tile ND


Location: M0029-21-02, Floor tile, grey Lab ID-Version‡: 1770041-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentBeige Floor Tile ND









ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116Location: M0029-22-01, Vinyl tile, strip Lab ID-Version‡: 1770042-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentBlack Baseboard ND


Location: M0029-22-02, Vinyl tile, strip Lab ID-Version‡: 1770043-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentBlack Baseboard ND


Location: M0029-23-01, Wall texture Lab ID-Version‡: 1770044-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentOff-White Texture with beige paint 2% Chrysotile


Location: M0029-23-02, Wall texture Lab ID-Version‡: 1770045-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentOff-White Texture with beige paint 2% Chrysotile


Location: M0029-24-01, Pipe lagging Lab ID-Version‡: 1770046-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentSilver Foil with light brown paper ND

Yellow Insulation NDComposite Non-Asbestos Fibrous Content: 70% Glass Fibers

20% CelluloseSample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate








ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116Location: M0029-24-02, Pipe lagging Lab ID-Version‡: 1770047-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentSilver Foil with light brown paper ND

Yellow Insulation NDComposite Non-Asbestos Fibrous Content: 70% Glass Fibers

20% CelluloseSample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate

Location: M0029-25-01, Door caulk, white Lab ID-Version‡: 1770048-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentWhite Caulk with brown paint ND


Location: M0029-25-02, Door caulk, white Lab ID-Version‡: 1770049-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentWhite Caulk with brown paint ND


Location: M0029-26-01, Exterior caulk, grey Lab ID-Version‡: 1770050-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentGray Caulk 8% Chrysotile

Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

Location: M0029-26-02, Exterior caulk, grey Lab ID-Version‡: 1770051-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentGray Caulk 8% Chrysotile

Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good








ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116Location: M0029-27-01, Exterior window caulk, black Lab ID-Version‡: 1770052-1



Location: M0029-27-02, Exterior window caulk, black Lab ID-Version‡: 1770053-1



Location: M0029-28-01, Exterior caulk, brown Lab ID-Version‡: 1770054-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentBrown Caulk ND


Location: M0029-28-02, Exterior caulk, brown Lab ID-Version‡: 1770055-1

Sample Layers Asbestos ContentBrown Caulk ND






A p p e n d i c e s

A P P E N D I X E

I N S P E C T O R C E R T I F I C A T I O N S

APPENDIX B 1

Tables 2

3

ACBM Category Accessibility: Condition: Activity: 1‐TSI 2‐SM 3‐Misc 0 – Not accessible 1 – Infrequently 2 – Occasionally 3 ‐ Frequently 0 – Good 1 – Damaged 2 – Significantly damaged 0 – Disturbance unlikely 1 – Disturbance infrequently 2 – Disturbance occasionally 3 – Disturbance frequently

table1_ITRcts_revALLIANT26Apr13 Page 1 of 1

Table 1. Asbestos Containing Building Material Inventory

Customer: 88TH RSC Project No.: 4216‐001 Inspector: Tim

Desjardins Signature:

State of Accreditation TN Accred.

No. A‐I‐59089‐25522

Building: MO029

4100 Goodfellow Blvd. St Louis, Missouri 63120

Functional Space:

U.S. Army Reserve Center St. Louis

(administrative storage / staging)

No. of Occupants 1 Duration

of Exp. 400 hrs / YR

Date: 3/21/2013 Time: 12:30

Sample No. *ACBM Cat. HA No. Sample Location Description Qty U/M

(Circle one) %

Dmgd *Access. *Cond. *Act. Friable?()

PhotoID

%Asbestos Comments

3 07 Beige Floor Tile with yellow mastic 1000 LF /SF <1 0 0 1 N 1

Floor tile = ND / mastic

= 2% chrysotile

2 23 Off‐white wall texture with beige paint 5000 LF /SF <1 1 0 2 N 2, 3,

4 2%

chrysotile

The paint appears to have been stripped from the walls in room 125. Sampling will be necessary to confirm no asbestos is present or

remaining. Other block walls appear to have a texture and beige paint like the 2008

report description of HA23.

3 26 Grey exterior caulk 1000 LF /SF <1 1 0 0 N 5, 6 8% chrysotile

LF /SF

LF /SF

LF /SF

General Functional Space Description (e.g., color, texture, application, date(s) of installation, use of the functional space)

Ceilings: Suspended ceiling tile with precast concrete decking above with some insulation in select areas like room the 126 area.

Floors: Appears to be concrete slab on grade with primarily 12” x 12” floor tiles. The building has a small basement and may have return air plenums below the floors

Walls: Plaster system over brick and block some with acoustical texture like the auditorium. Drywall or Gypsum wall board in some rooms and some areas are bare brick, block or concrete.

Other: (Uses, etc.)

Facility is no longer in use but maintenance activities require weekly entry and could become a full time occupation of the facility to correct a utility failure.

APPENDIX C 1

Figures 2

3

��

�� !�"��#�$�%��

&'�(%��)*�#��

APPENDIX D 1

Photograph Log2

Building: ARMY RESERVE CENTER Photograph: 1Date: 21 Mar 2013

Description:Floor tile mastic Yellow masticFloor tile mastic Yellow mastic 12”X12” Beige floor tiles

HA 07

Building: ARMY RESERVE CENTER

Description:Room 125

Photograph: 2Date: 21 Mar 2013

Room 125 Off‐white wall texture with beige paint appears to have been abated

1

HA 23


Description:Off‐white wall texture with beige gpaint

Abated texture from room 125

HA 23

Building: ARMY RESERVE CENTER

Description:wall texture with beige paint

Photograph: 4Date: 21 Mar 2013

wall texture with beige paint

Texture on Block walls

HA 23

2

HA 23


Description:

Exterior gray calk

HA 26


Description:

Exterior gray calk

HA 26

3

APPENDIX E 1

Inspector’s Certification 2

3

Final Asbestos-Containing Material Survey Update St. Louis U ...Final ACM Survey Update St. Louis...

Documents

Transcript of Final Asbestos-Containing Material Survey Update St. Louis U ...Final ACM Survey Update St. Louis...