FILED STATE OF CALIFORNIA KAMALA MEDICAL …4patientsafety.org/documents/Smith, Brit O...
Transcript of FILED STATE OF CALIFORNIA KAMALA MEDICAL …4patientsafety.org/documents/Smith, Brit O...
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California JUDITH T. ALVARADO Supervising Deputy Attorney General CHRISTINA L. SEIN Deputy Attorney General State Bar No. 229094
California Department of Justice 300 So. Spring Street, Suite 1702 Los Angeles, CA 90013 Telephone: (213) 897-9444 Facsimile: (213) 897-9395
Attorneys for Complainant
FILED STATE OF CALIFORNIA
MEDICAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTo,-.:F:,, :1,aqf 12. 20 t7 By \' ~-~ -
t:) fe.4i • ttc:::~..<Jdr'( ANALYST
BEFORE THE 8
9
10
MEDICAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
11 In the Matter of the Accusation Against:
12 Brit 0. Smith, M.D. 44847 North lOth Street West
13 Lancaster, CA 93534
Physician's and Surgeon's Certificate No. A 16994,
Case No. 800-2015-014156
ACCUSATION
14
15
16
17
Respondent.
18 Complainant alleges:
19 PARTIES
20 1. Kimberly Kirchmeyer (Complainant) brings this Accusation solely in her official
21 capacity as the Executive Director ofthe Medical Board of California, Department of Consumer
22 Affairs (Board).
23 2. On or about June 30, 1956, the Medical Board issued Physician's and Surgeon's
24 Certificate Number A 16994 to Brit 0. Smith, M.D. (Respondent). The Physician's and Surgeon's
25 Certificate was in full force and effect at all times relevant to the charges brought herein and will
26 expire on July 31, 2018, unless renewed.
27 Ill
28 Ill
1
(BRIT 0. SMITH, M.D.) ACCUSATION NO. 800-2015-014156
1
2
JURISDICTION
3. This Accusation is brought before the Board, under the authority of the following
3 laws. All section references are to the Business and Professions Code unless otherwise indicated.
4 4. Section 2227 of the Code provides that a licensee who is found guilty under the
5 Medical Practice Act may have his or her license revoked, suspended for a period not to exceed
6 one year, placed on probation and required to pay the costs of probation monitoring, publicly
7 reprimanded, or such other action taken in relation to discipline as the Board deems proper.
8 5. Section 2234 of the Code, states in pertinent part:
9 "The board shall take action against any licensee who is charged with unprofessional
10 conduct. In addition to other provisions of this article, unprofessional conduct includes, but is not
11 limited to, the following:
12 "(a) Violating or attempting to violate, directly or indirectly, assisting in or abetting the
13 violation of, or conspiring to violate any provision of this chapter.
14 "(b) Gross negligence.
15 "(c) Repeated negligent acts. To be repeated, there must be two or more negligent acts or
16 omissions. An initial negligent act or omission followed by a separate and distinct departure from
17 the applicable standard of care shall constitute repeated negligent acts.
18
19
" .,,
6. Section 2242 of the Code states:
20 "(a) Prescribing, dispensing, or furnishing dangerous drugs as defmed in Section 4022
21 without an appropriate prior examination and a medical indication, constitutes unprofessional
22 conduct.
23 "(b) No licensee shall be found to have committed unprofessional conduct within the
24 meaning of this section if, at the time the drugs were prescribed, dispensed, or furnished, any of the
25 following applies:
26 "(1) The licensee was a designated physician and surgeon or podiatrist serving in the
27 absence of the patient's physician and surgeon or podiatrist, as the case may be, and if the drugs
28 were prescribed, dispensed, or furnished only as necessary to maintain the patient until the return
2
(BRIT 0. SMITH, M.D.) ACCUSATION NO. 800-2015-014156
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
of his or her practitioner, but in any case no longer than 72 hours.
"(2) The licensee transmitted the order for the drugs to a registered nurse or to a
licensed vocational nurse in an inpatient facility, and ifboth of the following conditions exist:
"(A) The practitioner had consulted with the registered nurse or licensed vocational
nurse who had reviewed the patient's records.
"(B) The practitioner was designated as the practitioner to serve in the absence of
the patient's physician and surgeon or podiatrist, as the case may be.
"(3) The licensee was a designated practitioner serving in the absence of the patient's
physician and surgeon or podiatrist, as the case may be, and was in possession of or had utilized
the patient's records and ordered the renewal of a medically indicated prescription for an amount
not exceeding the original prescription in strength or amount or for more than one refill.
"(4) The licensee was acting in accordance with Section 120582 ofthe Health and
Safety Code."
7. Section 2266 of the Code states: "The failure of a physician and surgeon to maintain
adequate and accurate records relating to the provision of services to their patients constitutes
unprofessional conduct."
8. Section 3501 of the Code states in pertinent part:
"(a) As used in this chapter:
"
"(5) "Supervising physician" means a physician and surgeon licensed by the Medical
Board of California or by the Osteopathic Medical Board of California who supervises one or
more physician assistants, who possesses a current valid license to practice medicine, and who is
not currently on disciplinary probation for improper use of a physician assistant.
"( 6) "Supervision" means that a licensed physician and surgeon oversees the activities
of, and accepts responsibility for, the medical services rendered by a physician assistant.
"
"( 1 0) "Delegation of services agreement" means the writing that delegates to a
physician assistant from a supervising physician the medical services the physician assistant is
3
(BRIT 0. SMITH, M.D.) ACCUSATION NO. 800-2015-014156
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
authorized to perform consistent with subdivision (a) of Section 1399.540 ofTitle 16 ofthe
California Code of Regulations.
"
"(b) A physician assistant acts as an agent of the supervising physician when perfonning
any activity authorized by this chapter or regulations adopted under this chapter."
9. Section 3502, subdivision (a), of the Code states in pertinent part:
"(a) Notwithstanding any other law, a physician assistant may perform those medical services
as set forth by the regulations adopted under this chapter when the services are rendered under the
supervision of a licensed physician and surgeon who is not subject to a disciplinary condition
imposed by the Medical Board of California prohibiting that supervision or prohibiting the
employment of a physician assistant. The medical record, for each episode of care for a patient,
shall identifY the physician and surgeon who is responsible for the supervision of the physician
assistant."
14 10. California Code ofRegulations, Title 16, section 1399.541 states as follows:
15 "Because physician assistant practice is directed by a supervising physician, and a physician
16 assistant acts as an agent for that physician, the orders given and tasks performed by a physician
1 7 assistant shall be considered the same as if they had been given and performed by the supervising
18 physician. Unless otherwise specified in these regulations or in the delegation or protocols, these
19 orders may be initiated without the prior patient specific order of the supervising physician. In any
20 setting, including for example, any licensed health facility, out-patient settings, patients' residences,
21 residential facilities, and hospices, as applicable, a physician assistant may, pursuant to a delegation
22 and protocols where present:
23 "(a) Take a patient history; perform a physical examination and make an assessment and
24 diagnosis therefrom; initiate, review and revise treatment and therapy plans including plans for
25 those services described in Section 1399.541(b) through Section 1399.54l(i) inclusive; and record
26 and present pertinent data in a manner meaningful to the physician.
27 "(b) Order or transmit an order for x-ray, other studies, therapeutic diets, physical therapy,
28 occupational therapy, respiratory therapy, and nursing services.
4
(BRIT 0. SMITH, M.D.) ACCUSATION NO. 800-2015-014156
1 "(c) Order, transmit an order for, perform, or assist in the performance of laboratory
2 procedures, screening procedures and therapeutic procedures.
3 "(d) Recognize and evaluate situations which call for immediate attention of a physician and
4 institute, when necessary, treatment procedures essential for the life of the patient.
5 "(e) Instruct and counsel patients regarding matters pertaining to their physical and mental
6 health. Counseling may include topics such as medications, diets, social habits, family planning,
7 normal growth and development, aging, and understanding of and long-term management of their
8 diseases.
9 "(f) Initiate arrangements for admissions, complete forms and charts pertinent to the
10 patient's medical record, and provide services to patients requiring continuing care, including
11 patients at home.
12 "(g) Initiate and facilitate the referral of patients to the appropriate health facilities, agencies,
13 and resources of the community.
14 "(h) Administer or provide medication to a patient, or issue or transmit drug orders orally or
15 in writing in accordance with the provisions of subdivisions (a)-( f), inclusive, of Section 3 502.1 of
16 the Code.
17 "(i) ( 1) Perform surgical procedures without the personal presence of the supervising
18 physician which are customarily performed under local anesthesia. Prior to delegating any such
19 surgical procedures, the supervising physician shall review documentation which indicates that the
20 physician assistant is trained to perform the surgical procedures. All other surgical procedures
21 requiring other forms of anesthesia may be performed by a physician assistant only in the personal
22 presence of a supervising physician.
23 "(2) A physician assistant may also act as frrst or second assistant in surgery under the
24 supervision of a supervising physician. The physician assistant may so act without the personal
25 presence of the supervising physician if the supervising physician is immediately available to the
26 physician assistant. "Immediately available" means the physician is physically accessible and able
27 to return to the patient, without any delay, upon the request of the physician assistant to address
28 any situation requiring the supervising physician's services."
5
(BRIT 0. SMITH, M.D.) ACCUSATION NO. 800-20I5-0I4156
1 11. California Code ofRegulations section 1399.545, subdivision (f), states in pertinent
2 part:
3 "(f) The supervising physician has continuing responsibility to follow the progress of the
4 patient and to make sure that the physician assistant does not function autonomously. The
5 supervising physician shall be responsible for all medical services provided by a physician assistant
6 under his or her supervision."
7 12. California Code ofRegulations section 1399.546 states:
8 "Each time a physician assistant provides care for a patient and enters his or her name,
9 signature, initials, or computer code on a patient's record, chart or written order, the physician
10 assistant shall also enter the name ofhis or her supervising physician who is responsible for the
11 patient. When a physician assistant transmits an oral order, he or she shall also state the name of
12 the supervising physician responsible for the patient."
13 13. Section 11217 ofthe California Health and Safety Code states:
14 "Except as provided in Section 11223, no person shall treat an addict for addiction to a
15 narcotic drug except in one ofthe following:
16 "(a) An institution approved by the State Department of Social Services and the State
17 Department of Health Care Services, and where the patient is at all times kept under restraint and
18 control.
19 "(b) A city or county jail.
20 "(c) A state prison.
21 "(d) A facility designated by a county and approved by the State Department of Social
22 Services pursuant to Division 5 (commencing with Section 5000) ofthe Welfare and Institutions
23 Code.
24 "(e) A state hospital.
25 "(f) A county hospital.
26 "(g) A facility licensed by the State Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs pursuant to
27 Division 10.5 (commencing with Section 11750).
28 "(h) A facility as defmed in subdivision (a) or (b) of Section 1250 and Section 1250.3.
6
(BRIT 0. SMITH, M.D.) ACCUSATION NO. 800-2015-014156
1 "A narcotic controlled substance in the continuing treatment of addiction to a controlled
2 substance shall be used only in those programs licensed by the State Department of Alcohol and
3 Drug Programs pursuant to Article 3 (commencing with Section 11875) of Chapter 1 ofPart 3 of
4 Division 10.5 on either an inpatient or outpatient basis, or both.
5
6
" "
FIRST CAUSE FOR DISCIPLINE
7 (Gross Negligence)
8 14. Respondent's license is subject to disciplinary action under section 2234, subdivision
9 (b), of the Code in that he committed gross negligence in his care and treatment of patients B.A.,
10 M.C., C.K., and H.T. 1 The circumstances are as follows:
11 15. At all times relevant to the charges herein, Respondent was a licensed physician and
12 surgeon with a solo family medicine practice that also employed a physician assistant. Respondent
13 was the supervising physician for the physician assistant.
14 16. The standard of care provides that the care and management of a patient with chronic
15 pain should include an initial physical examination and history sufficient to establish the patient's
16 symptoms, psychosocial assessment, screening for risk of drug abuse, previous evaluation,
17 previous treatment, and possible etiologies. Treatment involves medication, but only in
18 conjunction with further evaluation, non-phannacological interventions, and appropriate referrals.
19 When medications are prescribed, they should be in appropriate dose and quantity to treat
20 symptoms and to minimize the risk of dependency, abuse or drug diversion. While opioids are
21 sometimes necessary, other classes of medications (NSAIDs, antidepressants, anti-epileptics,
22 topical analgesics) should also be considered.
23 17. The standard of care requires that use of a physician assistant should be documented
24 by a delegation of services agreement confrrming appropriate supervision and authorized services.
25 The medical chart should clearly document which provider has seen a patient.
26 Ill
27
28 1 The patients are identified by initial to protect their privacy.
7
(BRIT 0. SMITH, M.D.) ACCUSATION NO. 800-2015-014156
1 18. The standard of care is that HPV screening in a postmenopausal patient is an
2 important test for screening of cervical cancer. The appropriate evaluation of an abnormal HPV
3 screening test is colposcopy, especially ifthere is unexplained vaginal bleeding. Even if
4 colposcopy is negative, further evaluation is indicated for unexplained vaginal bleeding, especially
5 in a postmenopausal patient.
6 19. The standard of care provides that chronic and repeated prescriptions for Methadone
7 can be an appropriate treatment, but only as part of a structured and appropriately regulated
8 Methadone treatment program.
9 Patient B.A.
10 20. Patient B.A. was a long-time patient of Respondent. For the time period of
11 approximately August 22, 2012 to December 8, 2014, B.A., a then twenty-nine year-old male,
12 treated at Respondent's practice approximately 50 times. There is no evidence that a complete
13 physical examination was performed during this time frame. B.A.'s weight is recorded for many,
14 but not all visits, blood pressure is recorded on approximately 12 visits, and there is no
15 documentation of a physical examination in the notes or of an assessment. The plan includes
16 documentation of various medications prescribed during this time interval, including phentermine,
17 Norco, Xanax, Percocet and Ultram. Records show six prescriptions by Respondent for a total of
18 720 tablets of acetaminophen/ codeine, 2 prescriptions of Oxycodone for a total of 90 tablets, and 2
19 prescriptions for hydrocodone for a total of 270 tablets.
20 21. Respondent's treatment ofpatient B.A. includes the following acts and/or omissions
21 which constitute extreme departures from the standard of care:
22 a. There is insufficient documentation that B.A.'s symptoms were adequately
23 evaluated and that non-narcotic treatment alternatives were adequately considered.
24 b. The notes and medical record for B.A. do not indicate whether Respondent or
25 the physician assistant provided care for the patient at each encounter, and which provider was
26 authorizing prescriptions.
27 ///
28 Ill
8
(BRIT 0. SMITH, M.D.) ACCUSATION NO. 800-2015-014156
1 Patient M.C.
2 22. Patient M.C., a then sixty-five year-old female, treated at Respondent's practice from
3 approximately October 10, 2012 through September 26, 2014. There are approximately 27 entries
4 in the medical record during this time frame. On December 9, 2013, the patient complained of
5 vaginal bleeding for three days. Treatment included Estrace, however, there is no documentation
6 of menstrual history or postmenopausal bleeding. The patient had an abnormal Pap smear on May
7 1, 2013 showing the presence ofhigh risk HPV DNA. The Pap smear was repeated on June 27,
8 2013 and high risk HPV DNA was not detected. Respondent prescribed to M.C. carisoprodol
9 four times for a total of 360 tablets and oxycodone one time for a total of 90 tablets. These
10 prescriptions were filled between September 2013 and January 2014, which coincide with onset of
11 shingles. There is no evidence oftreatment with antivirals or non-narcotic pain medications.
12 23. Respondent's treatment of patient M.C. included the following acts and/or omissions
13 which constitute extreme departures from the standard of care:
14 a. M.C. was prescribed hormone therapy without any determination of the cause of
15 the vaginal bleeding. Merely repeating the Pap smear is insufficient follow-up of the initial
16 abnormal result.
17 b. The notes and medical record for M.C. do not indicate whether Respondent or
18 the physician assistant provided care for the patient at each encounter, and which provider was
19 authorizing prescriptions.
20 Patient C.K.
21 24. Patient C.K, a then sixty-two year-old female, treated at Respondent's practice from
22 approximately October 28, 2011 through December 19, 2014. During this time period, there are
23 approximately 18 entries in the medical chart. The notes mention hip pain, leg brace, and at least
24 four visits for urinary complaints. Neither a physical examination, specific assessment, nor plan are
25 documented. An MRI report indicates low back pain, prior right hip surgery, and a prior history
26 of stroke. Respondent prescribed hydrocodone, zolpidem, hydrocodone, and lorazepam to C.K.
27 on multiple occasions.
28 ///
9
(BRIT 0. SMITH, M.D.) ACCUSATION NO. 800-2015-014156
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
25. Respondent's treatment of patient C.K. includes the following acts and/or omissions
which constitute extreme departures from the standard of care:
a. There is insufficient documentation that C.K. 's symptoms were adequately
evaluated and that non-narcotic treatment alternatives were adequately considered.
b. The notes and medical record for C.K. do not indicate whether Respondent or
the physician assistant provided care for the patient at each encounter, and which provider was
authorizing prescriptions.
Patient H. T.
26. Patient H.T., a then twenty-six year-old female, treated at Respondent's practice from
approximately July 1, 2013 to November 21,2014. There are approximately 21 entries in the
medical chart during this time frame. H.T. was referred for continuing Methadone treatment.
There is no evidence in the records that she was enrolled in a structured opioid treatment program.
27. Respondent's treatment of patient H.T. includes the following acts and/or omissions
which constitute extreme departures from the standard of care:
a. There is no evidence that H.T. was enrolled in an appropriate Methadone
maintenance program. Although Respondent was an employee of a regulated Methadone center,
the prescriptions to H. T. were provided through his private practice, which is not an official
regulated Methadone maintenance program.
b. The notes and medical record for H. T. do not indicate whether Respondent or
the physician assistant provided care for the patient at each encounter, and which provider was
authorizing prescriptions.
28. Respondent's acts and/or omissions as set forth in paragraphs 20 through 27, above,
whether proven individually, jointly, or in any combination thereof, constitute gross negligence,
pursuant to section 2234, subdivision (b), of the Code. Therefore, cause for discipline exists.
SECOND CAUSE FOR DISCIPLINE
(Repeated Negligent Acts)
27 29. Respondent's license is subject to disciplinary action under section 2234, subdivision
28 (c), of the Code in that he committed repeated negligent acts in his care and treatment of patients
10
(BRIT 0. SMITH, M.D.) ACCUSATION NO. 800-2015-014156
1 B.A., M.C., C.K., and H.T. The circumstances are as follows:
2 30. The allegations of the First Cause for Discipline are incorporated by reference as if
3 fully set forth herein.
4 31. Respondent's treatment of patient M.C. includes the following act and/or omission
5 which constitutes a repeated negligent act: At times, treatment of shingles and post-herpetic
6 neuralgia with narcotic medication can be appropriate, however, alternatives to narcotic
7 medications should be considered. There is no evidence that M.C. was treated with antiviral
8 medication (e.g., Acyclovir or Valacyclovier) or that non-narcotic medication (e.g., Neurontin)
9 was considered.
10 32. Respondent's acts and/or omissions as set forth in paragraphs 30 through 31, above,
11 whether proven individually, jointly, or in any combination thereof, constitute repeated negligent
12 acts, pursuant to section 2234, subdivision (c), of the Code. Therefore, cause for discipline exists.
13 THIRD CAUSE FOR DISCIPLINE
14 (Inadequate Record Keeping)
15 33. Respondent's license is subject to disciplinary action under sections 2234, subdivision
16 (a), and 2266 ofthe Code in that he failed to maintain adequate records concerning the care and
17 treatment of patients B.A., M.C., C.K., and H.T. The circumstances are as follows:
18 34. The allegations of the First Cause for Discipline are incorporated by reference as if
19 fully set forth herein.
20 35. Respondent's acts and/or omissions as set forth in paragraph 34, above, whether
21 proven individually, jointly, or in any combination thereof, constitute failure to maintain adequate
22 and accurate records, pursuant to section 2266 ofthe Code. Therefore, cause for discipline exists.
23 FOURTH CAUSE FOR DISCIPLINE
24 (Failure to Document Supervision of Physician Assistants)
25 36. Respondent's license is subject to disciplinary action under sections 2234, subdivision
26 (a), 2266, and 3502, subdivision (a), ofthe Code, and California Code ofRegulations, Title 16,
27 section 1399.546, in that Respondent was the supervising physician, however, the medical records
28 of patients B.A., M.C., C.K., and H.T. do not indicate whether Respondent or the physician
11
(BRIT 0. SMITH, M.D.) ACCUSATION NO. 800-2015-014156
1 assistant provided care for the patient at each encounter, and which provider was authorizing
2 prescriptions. The circumstances are as follows:
3 37. The allegations of the First Cause for Discipline are incorporated by reference as if
4 fully set forth herein.
5 38. Respondent's acts and/or omissions as set forth in paragraph 37, above, whether
6 proven individually, jointly, or in any combination thereof, constitute failure to document
7 supervision of physician assistants in violation of sections 2266 and 3502, subdivision (a), ofthe
8 Code and California Code ofRegulations, Title 16, section 1399.546. Therefore, cause for
9 discipline exists.
10 FIFTH CAUSE FOR DISCIPLINE
11 (Prescribing Without Exam/Indication- Patients B.A., M.C., and C.K.)
12 39. Respondent's license is subject to disciplinary action under section 2242 of the Code,
13 in that Respondent prescribed controlled substances and/or dangerous drugs to patients B.A.,
14 M.C., and C.K. without an appropriate prior examination or medical indication therefor. The
15 circumstances are as follows:
16 40. Paragraphs 15 through 25 are incorporated by reference andre-alleged as if fully set
1 7 forth herein.
18 41. Respondent's acts and/or omissions as set forth in paragraph 40, above, whether
19 proven individually, jointly, or in any combination thereof, constitute prescribing without an
20 appropriate prior examination or medical indication, pursuant to section 2242 of the Code.
21 Therefore, cause for discipline exists.
22 DISCIPLINARY CONSIDERATIONS
23 42. To determine the degree of discipline, if any, to be imposed on Respondent,
24 Complainant alleges that on or about October 26, 2000, in a prior disciplinary action entitled In the
25 Matter of the Accusation Against: Brit Owen Smith, MD., before the Medical Board of California,
26 Case No. 11-98-91571, Respondent's license received a Public Letter ofReprimand related to his
27 care and treatment of a single patient, including requirements of a Physician Assessment and
28 Clinical Education Program and an ethics course. That decision is now fmal and is incorporated by
12
(BRIT 0. SMITH, M.D.) ACCUSATION NO. 800-2015-014156
reference as if fully set forth herein.
2 PRAYER
3 WHEREFORE, Complainant requests that a hearing be held on the matters herein alleged,
4 and that following the hearing, the Medical Board of California issue a decision:
5 1. Revoking or suspending Physician's and Surgeon's Certificate Number A 16994, issued
6 to Brit 0. Smith, M.D.;
7 2. Revoking, suspending or denying approval of Brit 0. Smith, M.D.'s authority to
8 supervise physician assistants, pursuant to section 3527 of the Code;
9 3. Ordering Brit 0. Smith, M.D., if placed on probation, to pay the Board the costs of
10 probation monitoring; and
11
12
4. Taking such other and further action as deemed necessary and proper.
13 DATED: January 12, 2017
14
15
16
17 LA20 16503399
18 62240903.doc
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Executive Directo Medical Board of California Department of Consumer Affairs State of California Complainant
13
(BRIT 0. SMITH, M.D.) ACCUSATION NO. 800-20I5-014156