1FIELDS iCDR

Solar Probe Plus FIELDSInstrument CDR

Introduction

Peter Harvey

2FIELDS iCDR

Day 1 Agenda

Peter Harvey

Start Description Presenter File8:00 Coffee, decaf, water and sodas 8:30 Review Board Scope Review Board Chr8:45 Introduction Harvey 000_SPF_ICDR_Introduction9:00 Science & Instrument Overview Bale 001_SPF_ICDR_Science9:30 Systems Engineering Goetz 002_SPF_ICDR_Systems

11:00 Mechanical/Thermal11:00 Antenna Mechanisms Glaser 003_SPF_ICDR_Antenna12:30 LUNCH13:30 Main Electronics Package Donakowski 004_SPF_ICDR_MEP14:00 Thermal Design Diaz-Aguado 005_SPF_ICDR_Thermal14:45 Sensors 14:45 Preamps Seitz 006_SPF_ICDR_Preamps15:45 MAG Sensor and Electronics Sheppard 007_SPF_ICDR_MAG16:45 Adjourn

3FIELDS iCDR

Day 2 Agenda

Peter Harvey

Start Description Presenter File8:00 Coffee, decaf, water and sodas 8:30 Review Issues and Concerns Review Board Chr8:45 Sensors (Continued)8:45 SCM Jannet 100_SPF_ICDR_SCM9:15 Electrical9:15 AEB Bonnell 101_SPF_ICDR_AEB9:45 Break

10:00 DFB Malaspina 102_SPF_ICDR_DFB11:00 RFS Seitz 103_SPF_ICDR_RFS_Analog11:20 DCB Gordon 104_SPF_ICDR_DCB11:40 DCB FPGA Gordon 105_SPF_ICDR_DCB_FPGA12:00 DCB FSW Harvey 106_SPF_ICDR_DCB_FSW12:30 LUNCH13:30 TDS Goetz 107_SPF_ICDR_TDS14:15 TDS FPGA Hinze 108_SPF_ICDR_TDS_FPGA14:45 TDS FSW Hinze 109_SPF_ICDR_TDS_FSW15:15 LNPS Monson 110_SPF_ICDR_LNPS15:45 Electrical GSE Quinn 111_SPF_ICDR_GSE16:00 Adjourn (NLT 4pm)

4FIELDS iCDR

Day 3 Agenda

Peter Harvey

Start Description Presenter File8:00 Coffee, decaf, water and sodas 8:30 Review Issues and Concerns Review Board Chr8:45 Systems Analyses Goetz 200_SPF_ICDR_Analyses9:30 Integration and Test Plans Goetz 201_SPF_ICDR_I&T

11:00 Break11:15 Mission Assurance, Parts Fischer 202_SPF_ICDR_SMA12:00 Management Harvey, Hayes 203_SPF_ICDR_Management12:30 LUNCH13:30 Review Board13:30 Caucus Review Team14:30 Debrief/RFA Review Review Team15:30 Adjourn

FIELDS iCDR

FIELDS Organization

5Peter Harvey

FIELDS iCDR

Entrance Criteria

In compliance with NM 7120-81 and NPR 7123.1A, the Entrance Criteria for the Instrument CDR are:

1. Successful completion of the PDR and responses made to all PDR RFAs and RIDs, or a timely closure plan exists for those remaining open.

2. A preliminary CDR agenda, success criteria, and charge to the board have been agreed to by the technical team, project manager, and review chair prior to the CDR.

3. CDR technical work products listed below for both hardware and software system elements have been made available to the cognizant participants prior to the review:

a. updated baselined documents, as required;b. product build-to specifications for each hardware and software configuration item, along with

supporting trade-off analyses and data;c. fabrication, assembly, integration, and test plans and procedures;d. technical data package (e.g., integrated schematics, spares provisioning list, interface control

documents, engineering analyses, and specifications);e. operational limits and constraints;f. technical resource utilization estimates and margins;g. acceptance criteria;h. command and telemetry list;i. verification plan (including requirements and specification);j. validation plan;

6Peter Harvey

FIELDS iCDR

Entrance Criteria

Continued:k. launch site operations plan;l. checkout and activation plan;m. disposal plan (including decommissioning or termination);n. updated Technology Development Maturity Assessment Plan;o. updated risk assessment and mitigation;p. updated reliability analyses and assessments;q. updated cost and schedule data;r. updated logistics documentation;s. software design document(s) (including interface design documents);t. updated LLIL;u. subsystem-level and preliminary operations safety analyses;v. systems and subsystem certification plans and requirements (as needed); and w. system safety analysis with associated verifications.

7Peter Harvey

FIELDS iCDR

Success Criteria

1. The detailed design is expected to meet the requirements with adequate margins at an acceptable level of risk.

2. Interface control documents are sufficiently matured to proceed with fabrication, assembly, integration, and test, and plans are in place to manage any open items.

3. High confidence exists in the product baseline, and adequate documentation exists or will exist in a timely manner to allow proceeding with fabrication, assembly, integration, and test.

4. The product verification and product validation requirements and plans are complete.

5. The testing approach is comprehensive, and the planning for system assembly, integration, test, and launch site and mission operations is sufficient to progress into the next phase.

6. Adequate technical and programmatic margins and resources exist to complete the development within budget, schedule, and risk constraints.

7. Risks to mission success are understood and credibly assessed, and plans and resources exist to effectively manage them.

8. Safety and mission assurance (e.g., safety, reliability, maintainability, quality, and EEE parts) have been adequately addressed in system and operational designs, and any applicable S&MA products (e.g., PRA, system safety analysis and failure modes and effects analysis) have been approved.

8

Peter Harvey