Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor...

45
Field-to-trace-coupling models compared Sjoerd Op ‘t Land Mohamed Ramdani Richard Perdriau Tvrtko Mandić Adrijan Barić Bart Nauwelaers 1

Transcript of Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor...

Page 1: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

Field-to-trace-coupling models compared

Sjoerd Op ‘t Land Mohamed Ramdani

Richard Perdriau

Tvrtko Mandić Adrijan Barić Bart Nauwelaers

���1

Page 2: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

108 109

�1080

�720

�360�180�90

0

S 21

phas

e(d

egre

es)

MeasurementCoupled LinesModified Taylor

108 109

Frequency (Hz)

�80�70�60�50�40�30�20

S 21

mag

nitu

de(d

B) ?

=

���2

K =1

`

`Z

0

line · incident⇤ dz

Page 3: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip
Page 4: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

������������ ��

��

���4

Page 5: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

������������ ��

��

���5

E

H k

E

H k

Page 6: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip
Page 7: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

���7

Page 8: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

‒ TEM Cell‒ trans. line

1 2

4

‒ coupled trans. line 3

���8

Page 9: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

‒ TEM Cell‒ trans. line

1 2

4

‒ coupled trans. line 3

���9

Page 10: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

‒ TEM Cell‒ trans. line

1 2

4

‒ coupled trans. line 3

���10

Page 11: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

‒ TEM Cell‒ trans. line

1 2

4

‒ coupled trans. line 3

���11

Page 12: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

‒ TEM Cell‒ trans. line

1 2

4

‒ coupled trans. line 3

���12

Page 13: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

‒ TEM Cell‒ trans. line

1 2

4

‒ coupled trans. line 3

���13

Page 14: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

‒ TEM Cell‒ trans. line

1 2

4

‒ coupled trans. line 3

���14

Page 15: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

‒ TEM Cell‒ trans. line

1 2

4

‒ coupled trans. line 3

���15

Page 16: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

‒ TEM Cell‒ trans. line

1 2

4

‒ coupled trans. line 3

���16

50Ω

50Ω

50Ω

Page 17: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

K =1

`

`Z

0

line · incident⇤ dz

Page 18: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

���18

µ0, "0

µ0, "0"r

E

Zc Zc

H

E/"r !

c0cos�

!

c0

E

!

c0cos�H

H

Page 19: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

���19

µ0, "0

µ0, "0"r

E

Zc Zc

H

E/"r !

c0cos�

!

c0

E

!

c0cos�H

H

Page 20: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

���20

Rne Rfe hHn

Et

kp

x

zy

+–

RfeRne jωcEt h∆z

+

Vne Vfe+

jωµ0Hnh∆z e−jβ∆z

Page 21: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

���21

+–

RfeRne jωcEt h∆z

+

Vne Vfe+

jωµ0Hnh∆z e−jβ∆z

Vne = �1

2j!cEtZch`�

1

2j!µ0Hnh`

Vfe = �1

2j!cEtZch`+

1

2j!µ0Hnh`

ZcZc

``

`

Page 22: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

���22

µ0, "0

µ0, "0"r

E

Zc Zc

H

E/"r !

c0cos�

!

c0

E

!

c0cos�H

H

Page 23: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

µ0, "0

µ0, "0"r

E

Zc Zc

H

E/"r !

c0cos�

!

c0

E

!

c0cos�H

H

���23

–π

0

–2π

0 `z

\ (rad)

Page 24: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

���24

µ0, "0

µ0, "0"r

E

Zc Zc

H

E/"r !

c0cos�

!

c0

E

!

c0cos�H

H

00

–π

–2π

\ (rad)

`z

Page 25: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

���25

µ0, "0

µ0, "0"r

E

Zc Zc

H

E/"r !

c0cos�

!

c0

E

!

c0cos�H

H

00

–π

–2π

\ (rad)

`z

π

Page 26: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

���26

µ0, "0

µ0, "0"r

E

Zc Zc

H

E/"r !

c0cos�

!

c0

E

!

c0cos�H

H

00

–π

–2π

\ (rad)

`z

Page 27: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

���27

+–

RfeRne jωcEt h∆z

+

Vne Vfe+

jωµ0Hnh∆z e−jβ∆z

ZcZc

Page 28: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

+–

RfeRne j!cEt h�z

+

Vne Vfe+

j!µ0Hnh�z l�z

c�z

���28

ZcZc

Page 29: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

+–

RfeRne j!cEt h�z

+

Vne Vfe+

j!µ0Hnh�z l�z

c�z

���29

ZcZc

Page 30: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

+–

RfeRne j!cEt h�z

+

Vne Vfe+

j!µ0Hnh�z l�z

c�z

���30

ZcZc

Page 31: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

+–

RfeRne j!cEt h�z

+

Vne Vfe+

j!µ0Hnh�z l�z

c�z

���31

ZcZc

Page 32: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

+–

RfeRne j!cEt h�z

+

Vne Vfe+

j!µ0Hnh�z l�z

c�z

���32

ZcZc

Page 33: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

µ0, "0

µ0, "0"r

E

Zc Zc

H

E/"r !

c0cos�

!

c0

E

!

c0cos�H

H

���33

–π

0

–2π

0 `z

\ (rad)

1

Page 34: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

���34

µ0, "0

µ0, "0"r

E

Zc Zc

H

E/"r !

c0cos�

!

c0

E

!

c0cos�H

H

00

–π

–2π

\ (rad)

`z

0

Page 35: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

���35

00

–π

–2π

\ (rad)

`z

0

K =1

`

`Z

0

incident · wave⇤ dz

Page 36: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

���36

+–

RfeRne j!cEt h�z

+

Vne Vfe+

j!µ0Hnh�z l�z

c�z ZcZc

Page 37: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

Vne

= Kbackward

✓�1

2j!cEtZch`�

1

2j!µ

0

Hnh`

Vfe

= Kforward

✓�1

2j!cEtZch`+

1

2j!µ

0

Hnh`

◆e�j�`

���37

+–

RfeRne+

Vne Vfe+

K j!µ0Hn(0) h`

K j!cEt(0) h`

`

ZcZc

Vne

= Kbackward

✓�1

2j!cEtZch`�

1

2j!µ

0

Hnh`

Vfe

= Kforward

✓�1

2j!cEtZch`+

1

2j!µ

0

Hnh`

◆e�j�`

Page 38: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip
Page 39: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

0.5 1 1.5 2−80

−60

−40

−20

0

|S1

1| [

dB

]

0.5 1 1.5 2−2

−1

0

|S2

1| [

dB

]

Frequency [GHz]

max. operatingfrequency

fR011

fR101

fR012

���39

3

EUT

5

TEM Cells

TEM

Cells

20603 Earl St. , Torrance, CA 90503 Ҙ Phone: (310) 303-3300 x Fax (310) 371-6268

E-mail: [email protected] x www.fischercc.com Fischer Custom Communications, Inc.

�2009 Fischer Custom Communications, Inc.

All rights reserved x Printed in USA

0907DS-TEM Cell

Fischer Custom Communications, Inc.

offers a family of Transverse

Electromagnetic (TEM) cells that can be

used for both emissions and immunity

testing.

The patented septum design offers broad

frequency response, excellent field

uniformity, low VSWR and low insertion

loss. Models FCC-TEM-JM1 and FCC-TEM-JM2

are ideal for radiated emission testing of

semiconductor devices according to SAE

1752/3

The JM series TEM Cell can be used for

immunity testing and require less than 3.7

milli-watts input power to achieve a 10 volt

per meter electric field and 37 watts to

achieve 1000 volt per meter electric field.

Specifications FCC-TEM-JM1

FCC-TEM-JM2 FCC-TEM-JM3

FCC-TEM-JM4

Frequency range

DC – 1200MHz DC – 1600MHz

DC – 2000MHz DC – 2500MHz

Maximum EUT

dimensions (cm) 6 x 6 x 1

6 x 6 x 1

6 x 6 x 1

6 x 6 x 1

Maximum VSWR

1.2:1

1.2:1

1.25:1

1.25:1

RF Connector

Type-N

Type-N

Type-N

Type-N

Maximum Input Power 500 watts

500 watts 500 watts

500 watts

EUT port

dimensions (cm) 9.1 x 9.1

9.1 x 9.1

9.1 x 9.1

9.1 x 9.1

Dimensions (cm)

15.2 x 9.9 x 33.8 15.2 x 9.9 x 33.8

15.2 x 9.9 x 33.8 15.2 x 9.9 x 33.8

Page 40: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

���40

Page 41: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

? =

Page 42: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

108 109

�1080

�720

�360�180�90

0S 2

1ph

ase

(deg

rees

)

MeasurementCoupled LinesModified Taylor

108 109

Frequency (Hz)

�80�70�60�50�40�30�20

S 21

mag

nitu

de(d

B)

50Ω

���42

Page 43: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

108 109

�720

�360

�180�90

090

S 21

phas

e(d

egre

es)

MeasurementCoupled LinesModified Taylor

108 109

Frequency (Hz)

�80�70�60�50�40�30�20

S 21

mag

nitu

de(d

B)

50Ω

���43

Page 44: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor

Illumination TEM cell geometry Eavg

Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

Discontinuities as lumped elements impossible*

Tools MoL + ADS/Qucs Python/MATLAB

Modelling schematic automated

Accuracy +1.4 dB (1.0 dev) +1.1 dB (0.9 dev)

Page 45: Field-to-trace-coupling models compared · 2014. 10. 19. · Model Coupled Lines Modified Taylor Illumination TEM cell geometry E avg Traces multiple µstrip, CPW single µstrip

���45

.org

[email protected] [email protected]