Fiduciary Litigation Update

17
Fiduciary Litigation Update Presented by: Steven B. Malech Wiggin and Dana LLP Robert H. Sitkoff John L. Gray Professor of Law Harvard University Professional Education Broadcast Network May 4, 2015

Transcript of Fiduciary Litigation Update

Fiduciary Litigation

Update

Presented by:

Steven B. Malech

Wiggin and Dana LLP

Robert H. Sitkoff John L. Gray Professor of Law Harvard University

Professional Education

Broadcast Network

May 4, 2015

2

© 2

015 W

iggin

and D

ana L

LP

© 2

015 W

iggin

and D

ana L

LP

Overview

Interference with Inheritance

Circumstances and Examples

Practical Implications and Practice Tips

4

© 2

015 W

iggin

and D

ana L

LP

INTERFERENCE WITH INHERITANCE CLAIM

Elements An expected inheritance or gift

Knowledge by Defendant of the expectancy

Tortuous conduct by Defendant

Damage suffered by Plaintiff

5

© 2

015 W

iggin

and D

ana L

LP

Prior

Exhaustion

of

Adequate

Probate

Remedies

Before brining claim, in most states one must ….

6

© 2

015 W

iggin

and D

ana L

LP

Where Can you Bring an Interference Claim?

*Source: John C.P. Goldberg & Robert H. Sitkoff, Torts and Estates: Remedying Wrongful Interference with Inheritance, 65 Stan. L. Rev.

335

7

© 2

015 W

iggin

and D

ana L

LP

Longer SOL

Interested Witness

Testimony

Punitive Damages

Commence before donor’s death?

Advantages

Punitive Damages

Jury Trial

8

© 2

015 W

iggin

and D

ana L

LP

Inconsistent with donor’s freedom of disposition

Uncertainty in recognition across states/weak doctrinal basis

Conflict with principled policies, specialized rules/remedies

Difficulty in determining true intent of donor

Disadvantages

© 2

015 W

iggin

and D

ana L

LP

9

Circumstances

Non-Probate Transfers

Lifetime Asset Transfers

Fraud

© 2

015 W

iggin

and D

ana L

LP

10

Fraud:

Concealment of a Probate Proceeding

Concealment or Destruction of a Will

© 2

015 W

iggin

and D

ana L

LP

Recent Example in CT

Vechiola v. Fasanella

Facts: 2004:

Decedent executes Last Will and Testament

Residuary estate to 13 people.

Appoints Defendant as Power of Attorney

2005:

Decedent opens 4 Totten Trusts for benefit of Plaintiff

2010:

Defendant closes Trust accounts

Places funds - $427, 908.49 – in account for Defendant

Decedent passes away

12

© 2

015 W

iggin

and D

ana L

LP

1. Plaintiff knew of the existence of Totten Trust accounts and had a reasonable expectation of the inheritance;

2. Defendant knew of the accounts and closed them;

Court found all elements of Interference

with Inheritance Claim were met:

3. Defendant knew his family and he

would inherit the funds;

4. Plaintiff only received $32,835.20

instead of $ 427, 908.49

© 2

015 W

iggin

and D

ana L

LP

13

Result:

Plaintiff’s verdict

Value of Totten Trusts $427,908.49

Interest per CGS §37-3a $150,763.45

Interest per CGS §52-192a(c) $102,229.11

$680,901.05

© 2

015 W

iggin

and D

ana L

LP

14

Practical Implication/Practice Tips

Know the law of your jurisdiction

If Permitted: help or hurt potential claims

• Statute of Limitations

• Evidentiary Concerns

• Types of damage/sources of recovery

© 2

015 W

iggin

and D

ana L

LP

15

Facts:

Disinherited Child Procures Destruction of Will

Promises to pay terminally ill parent $10,00 per month

Pay’s attorney for parent

Claims:

Probate Copy of Destroyed Will

Interference Claim?

Whose Will Is It Anyway?

Last Will &

Testament

© 2

015 W

iggin

and D

ana L

LP

212-551-2633

[email protected]

Contact Information

617-384-8386

[email protected]

© 2

015 W

iggin

and D

ana L

LP

This presentation is a summary of legal principles.

Nothing in this presentation constitutes legal advice, which can only be

obtained as a result of a personal consultation with an attorney.

The information published here is believed accurate at the time of

publication, but is subject to change and does not purport to be a

complete statement of all relevant issues.