FIDH_ALTSEAN BURMA Recommendations Concerning EU-BurmaMyanmar Investment Relations
Transcript of FIDH_ALTSEAN BURMA Recommendations Concerning EU-BurmaMyanmar Investment Relations
-
8/13/2019 FIDH_ALTSEAN BURMA Recommendations Concerning EU-BurmaMyanmar Investment Relations
1/24
rticle 1: All human beings are born free and equal in
gnity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one anotherin a spirit of brotherhood.
rticle 2: Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration,without distinction of any kind, such as
ce, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore,
o distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which
person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation ofsovereignty. Article 3: Everyone
as the right to life, liberty and security of person. Article 4: No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall
e prohibited in all their forms. Article 5: No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel,
p
Recommendations concerning
EU-Burma/Myanmarinvestments relations
FIDH POSITION PAPER
-
8/13/2019 FIDH_ALTSEAN BURMA Recommendations Concerning EU-BurmaMyanmar Investment Relations
2/24
2 / Titre du rapport FIDH
-
8/13/2019 FIDH_ALTSEAN BURMA Recommendations Concerning EU-BurmaMyanmar Investment Relations
3/24
Introduction ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4
I. Human rights violations in Burma/Myanmar fueling non enabling environment
for investments -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------6
Ethnic conicts and religious violence ------------------------------------------------------6
Widespread impunity --------------------------------------------------------------------------7
Land evictions and land conscation --------------------------------------------------------7
Lack of good governance ---------------------------------------------------------------------8
Arbitrary detentions and restrictions on freedom of assembly ---------------------------8
Forced labour -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------8
Labour rights ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------9
II. Recommendations to the EU -------------------------------------------------------------------- 10
1. Preliminary reforms in Burma/Myanmar----------------------------------------------- 11
a. A roadmap for priority reforms ------------------------------------------------------ 11
b. Technical/nancial assistance and roadmap implementation monitoring----- 15
2. A Binding framework for EU companies investing in Burma/Myanmar----------- 15
3. Human rights impact assessment -------------------------------------------------------- 16
4. An agreement that efciently protects and respects human rights ------------------ 17
Background documents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 20
FIDH/TAHR The hidden face of Taiwan / 3
-
8/13/2019 FIDH_ALTSEAN BURMA Recommendations Concerning EU-BurmaMyanmar Investment Relations
4/24
4 / FIDHs Recommendations concerning EU-Burma/myanmar investments relations FIDH/ALTSEAN-Burma
Introduction
On July 2013, the Council of the European Union conrmed the EUs willingness to negotiate
and conclude an investment agreement with Burma/Myanmar. Yet at this stage, FIDH and its
member organisation Altsean-Burma, fear that should appropriate measures not be adopted
such agreement would only perpetrate or aggravate existing human rights violations, putting
European investors in high risk of complicity of these violations.
While the EU has justies the new chapter of the relations with Burma/Myanmar by the recent
political and economic developments in the country, the reforms are selective, shallow, and
often fail to comply with international standards. In addition, the implementation of reformsremains limited and inconsistent throughout the country.
Investment projects in Burma/Myanmar have already been linked to violent repression
of peaceful demonstrations and detentions of protestors and human rights defenders who
denounced their impacts on local communities. They have also led to forced evictions and land
conscations. Without reforms and adequate guarantees, Foreign Direct Investments are likely
to exacerbate human rights violations in the country.
Already in September 2012, in his report to the UN General Assembly, the UN Special
Rapporteur on the Human Right situation in Myanmar expressed concern, that given the
expected wave of privatizations and the increase in foreign investment, along with accelerated
economic development, there is likely to be increase in land conscations, development-induced displacement and other violations of economic, social and cultural rights.
The European Parliament, in its resolution of 23 May 2013 on reinstatement of Burma/
Myanmars access to generalised tariff preferences, warned that companies operating in
fragile states and weak governance zones, such as Myanmar/Burma, face an increased risk of
causing or contributing to human rights violations and that special measures are consequently
necessary in order to avoid this risk.
In this context, the strategy adopted by the EU seems to suffer from signicant shortcomings.
The comprehensive framework for the European Unions policy and support to Myanmar/
Burma endorsed by the Council of the EU in its conclusions of 22 July reveals that the EU is
conscious of the magnitude of the task. It denes what reforms are needed and plans to supportthem by various means, including statements, dialogue, technical and nancial support, trade
preferences and investments. However, this strategy does not dene the best interplay between
those tools, nor does it integrate human rights in its investment and trade component. As a
result, the document fails to adequately implement the EU strategic framework and action plan
on human rights and democracy adopted in June 2012 and exposes the EU, its member states,
its companies, and the people of Burma/Myanmar to major risks.
Past experiences have shown how statements, development cooperation aid, and voluntary CSR
initiatives used alone, without a use of the full range of instrument at is disposal and without
the adoption of the needed safeguards, rules and incentive regarding trade and investment, have
not led to an improvement of the human rights situation on the ground. The case of Bangladesh
where thousands of workers in the supply chain of European businesses, have lost theirlives highlight that improvements of human rights within the context of business operations
cannot be achieved through voluntary CSR initiatives of business. In other situations, without
having addressed the gravity of the situation properly, investments and trade preferences have
-
8/13/2019 FIDH_ALTSEAN BURMA Recommendations Concerning EU-BurmaMyanmar Investment Relations
5/24
FIDH/ALTSEAN-Burma FIDHs Recommendations concerning EU-Burma/myanmar investments relations / 5
exacerbated human rights violations. For instance, in Cambodia, investments in the sugar
sector, have resulted in the loss of land and the denial of adequate standards of living, including
access to food, health, and education for many rural communities. In addition farmers and
human rights defenders have been subjected to arbitrary detention and even killings.
This paper highlights the risks for investments to be linked to human rights violations given the
situation in Burma/Myanmar (I). It calls on the EU to clearly dene the best interplay between
its various policy tools and to integrate human rights in its investment policy (II).
-
8/13/2019 FIDH_ALTSEAN BURMA Recommendations Concerning EU-BurmaMyanmar Investment Relations
6/24
6 / FIDHs Recommendations concerning EU-Burma/myanmar investments relations FIDH/ALTSEAN-Burma
I. Human rights violationsin Burma/Myanmarfueling non enablingenvironment for
investmentsSome of the most serious human rights violations in Burma/Myanmar have been traditionally
linked to business activities in the country. The recent inux of foreign investment and the
implementation of associated infrastructure and development projects have already had a negative
impact on local communities, including land conscation, loss of livelihoods, militarization,
forced relocation, and environmental degradation. In addition, the country remains plagued by
widespread corruption and impunity, which prevents the effective fullment of the rights of
individuals and communities affected by business operations in Burma/Myanmar. Remedies
for those whose rights have been violated are generally inadequate and/or ineffective. A weaklegislative framework and a judiciary that is notoriously corrupt and that lacks independence
from the executive branch characterize Burma/Myanmars current business environment.
It is the responsibility of the EU to duly assess the situation and to take the necessary measures
to ensure that human rights are duly protected and taken into account in its investment policy.
Ethnic conflicts and religious violence
Since the collapse of a ceasere group between the government of Burma/Myanmar and the Kachin
Independence Army (KIA) in June 2011, the Tatmadaw (Burmas military) has conducted military
offensives against the KIA in Kachin and Northern Shan States. Tatmadaw soldiers committed
serious human rights violations, including the killing of civilians, arbitrary arrests, torture, rape of
women, forced relocation, and the use of civilians as human shields. Burma/Myanmars military
continues to commit other serious human rights violations across the country, including forced
labour, the recruitment and use of child soldiers, land conscation, and arbitrary taxation.
During two waves of sectarian violence in June and October 2012 in Arakan/Rakhine State,
Security forces failed to protect both Buddhist Rakhine and Muslim communities, including
Rohingya. Authorities committed serious human rights violations, predominantly targeting
Rohingya. The government denies citizenship to Rohingya in Arakan State and authorities
continue to impose severe restrictions on their fundamental freedoms, including freedom of
movement, freedom of religion, and freedom to marry.
Between March and October, Buddhist mobs carried out anti-Muslim attacks in Mandalay,
-
8/13/2019 FIDH_ALTSEAN BURMA Recommendations Concerning EU-BurmaMyanmar Investment Relations
7/24
FIDH/ALTSEAN-Burma FIDHs Recommendations concerning EU-Burma/myanmar investments relations / 7
Pegu, and Rangoon Divisions and in Arakan, Shan, and Kachin States. Once again, authorities
failed to prevent the violence and to take action against those who instigated the attacks.
Unrest in Arakan State and military offensives in Kachin and Northern Shan States have resulted in
the displacement of approximately 250,000 people. In Kachin State, the government has routinelyfrustrated the delivery of humanitarian aid to IDPs in area controlled by the Kachin Independence
Army (KIA). In Arakan State, Rohingya IDPs - who represent the overwhelming majority of the
140,000 people displaced by unrest remain segregated in squalid camps. Humanitarian agencies
have faced increasing threats and intimidation by members of the local Rakhine communities,
which has hampered the delivery of aid to Muslim and Rohingya IDPs In addition, four aid
workers have been arbitrarily detained in Buthidaung prison since mid-2012.
Widespread impunity
The country remains plagued by widespread corruption and impunity, which prevents the
effective implementation of the rights of individuals and communities affected by business
operations in Burma/Myanmar. Article 445 of the constitution grants members of the government
of Burma/Myanmar blanket immunity for past, current, and future human rights violations. In
Kachin and Northern Shan State, Tatmadaw soldiers continue to commit serious human rights
violations against civilians.
Land evictions and land confiscation
Farmers are being evicted from their land to make way for infrastructure and development
projects. In many cases, they have been prosecuted on charges of trespassing for tending land
that authorities had conscated from them.
The violations have already been documented by the UN Special Rapporteur on the human
rights situation in Myanmar. In his two reports dated March 7 and September 25, 2012, the UN
Special Rapporteur stated that he continued to receive reports of violations of land and housing
rights, in particular regarding the impact of infrastructure projects, natural resource exploitation
and associated land conscations. He also said that Those who resist eviction face harassment
or are arrested.
New laws adopted by Parliament fail to protect the rights of land users in Burma/Myanmar. The
Farmland Law legalizes land conscation for a wide range of activities that the government
claims to be of national interest. In addition, the law limits farmers access to courts by
stipulating that newly-created agencies under the Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation will
have jurisdiction over land-related disputes.
The Vacant, Fallow, and Virgin Land Management Law allows the government to label farmland
as vacant, fallow and virgin land and to reallocate it to domestic and foreign investors for the
development of industrial agricultural estates. Activists have warned that the law would result
in increased land conscation because very few farmers owned the ofcial certicates to claim
their land use rights.. Businessmen who have close ties to the government have already taken
advantage of the current situation by registering land in their own names.
On July 26, 2012, Parliament formed a commission tasked with investigating land conscation
cases across the country The commission has carried out fact-nding mission and received land
conscation complaints from farmers. However, the commissions recommendations have been
so far ignored by the authorities, including the military.
-
8/13/2019 FIDH_ALTSEAN BURMA Recommendations Concerning EU-BurmaMyanmar Investment Relations
8/24
8 / FIDHs Recommendations concerning EU-Burma/myanmar investments relations FIDH/ALTSEAN-Burma
In this context, access to an effective remedy for business-related human rights abuses, one of
the pillars of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs), remains a
signicant challenge. While foreign investors may in good faith lease land for their projects,
it will be challenging for them to conrm that such land has not been conscated from people
who have been denied access to legal remedy.
Lack of good governance
The practice of extortion and illegal taxation by the military remains widespread, particularly
in ethnic-nationality areas. Lack of transparency as well as the absence of consultation
with affected communities continues to be the norm for state-sponsored infrastructure and
development projects.
Arbitrary detentions and restrictions on freedom of assembly
The Burma/Myanmar authorities continue to severely restrict the right to peaceful assembly.
Authorities also target activists and human rights defenders who campaign against land
conscation and harmful infrastructure and development projects.
The government has used the Peaceful Gathering and Demonstration Law, enacted in July
2012, to arrest and imprison peaceful protesters. Between July 2012 and October 2013, 29
peaceful protesters were sentenced to prison terms for demonstrating without obtaining the
authorities prior permission. They included activists who protested against the China-backed
Kyaukpyu-Kunming dual oil and gas pipeline; farmers who protested land conscation; farmers
and human rights defenders who demonstrated against the expansion of the Letpadaung coppermine in Sagaing Region.
The government has also violently cracked down on farmers and human rights defenders on
numerous occasions. In a case that captured international attention, government security forces
used excessive force against farmers and activists who campaign against the expansion of the
Letpadaung copper mine in Salingyi Township, Sagaing Region in November 2012. Police
used white phosphorus grenades to disperse peaceful protesters camped near the mines site,
injuring over 100 people, including Buddhist monks. In April 2013, police red shots and used
batons to disperse farmers who had begun to plough land that authorities had conscated from
them for the copper mines expansion. At least seven farmers were injured in the crackdown.
In November 2013, police red rubber bullets on local residents in order to prevent them from
joining protestors camped near the Letpadaung copper mine. At least seven villagers wereinjured in the crackdown.
Forced labour
The widespread use of forced labour by authorities in Burma/Myanmar has often been linked to
the implementation of infrastructure and development projects. In March 2012, the government
of Burma/Myanmar and the International Labour Organisation (ILO) sign an agreement for the
eradication of forced labour in the country by 2015. Despite this ambitious plan, forced labour
cases, including the recruitment of child soldiers, continue to be reported, particularly in ethnic
areas. As a result, it is of the utmost importance that safeguards are put in place to avoid that EU
companies become complicit in forced labour practices.
-
8/13/2019 FIDH_ALTSEAN BURMA Recommendations Concerning EU-BurmaMyanmar Investment Relations
9/24
FIDH/ALTSEAN-Burma FIDHs Recommendations concerning EU-Burma/myanmar investments relations / 9
Labour rights
In October 2011, the Labour Organisation Law was enacted to allow the formation of trade
unions. This is an important step forward. However, due to a poor implementation of the law, theright of workers to form and join trade unions has not been fully recognized by many employers
and government ofcials. Numerous reports have already emerged of workers dismissed by
their employers for organizing unions.
In addition, Burma/Myanmar has not yet ratied most of the fundamental ILO Conventions.
In this context, foreign companies that conduct social auditing regarding their supply chain,
including Burmese factories, may nd it difcult to verify whether workers rights are respected.
Inadequate legislation coupled with poor implementation of existing laws also resulted in
poor labour conditions. Excessive working hours, low wages, poor health, safety, and social
conditions, child labour, and arbitrary penalties on workers are prevalent in many factories.
-
8/13/2019 FIDH_ALTSEAN BURMA Recommendations Concerning EU-BurmaMyanmar Investment Relations
10/24
10 / FIDHs Recommendations concerning EU-Burma/myanmar investments relations FIDH/ALTSEAN-Burma
II. Recommendations
to the EUThe EU strategic framework and action plan on human rights and democracy adopted by the
Council in June 2012 expresses the EUs commitment to integrate the promotion of human
rights in all areas of its external action without exception. It also pledges to make an effective
use of EU external policy instruments in order to ensure the best articulation between dialogue,
targeted support, incentives and restrictive measures.
In order to frame its policies in a manner consistent with its strategic framework, the EU has
then to conceive its policies in a strategic manner, avoiding the fact that investments exacerbatehuman rights violations, using the negotiation as an incentive to obtain the necessary safeguards
and reforms, and supporting them through development cooperation.
With regard to its investment policy vis--vis Burma/Myanmar, the EU has then to take into
account that investments may have both positive and negative impacts on human rights. They
may be facilitated or prevented because of the regulatory environment, its enforcement and the
respect by the investors of domestic legislation, international standards and applicable guidelines.
In its 16 April 2013 resolution, the European Parliament warned that foreign investments can
be benecial provided that: 1) the investment policy framework is connected to an overall
development strategy; 2) rules are set up in order to ensure the respect, fullment and protection
of human rights and to ensure the rule of law, transparency, and ght against corruption.
As outlined above, in Burma/Myanmar those conditions are not met at this point. Given the
weak legislative framework, the pattern of systematic human rights violations associated to
business activities, as well as corruption and a lack of an independent judiciary, the EU must
take appropriate measures to ensure that it complies with its human rights obligations.
Thus, FIDH and Altsean-Burma call on the EU to:
1. Before concluding an investment agreement, negotiate and conclude with the government
of Burma/Myanmar a time-bound and benchmarked roadmap that identies priority
reforms needed to create a business environment that is conductive to the fullment of
human rights;
2. Provide technical and nancial support to the implementation of the roadmap and closely
monitor progress towards its realisation;
3. Develop a binding normative framework for EU companies engaged in business activities
in Burma/Myanmar in order to ensure that they respect human rights, as set forth in the
UNGPs and OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises;
4. Carry out a human rights impact assessment of investments in Burma/Myanmar and
incorporate the assessments ndings in negotiations on investment agreements with the
government;
5. When conditions are fullled to ensure business environment that is conductive to thefullment of human rights, negotiate an investment agreement that efciently protects and
respects human rights.
-
8/13/2019 FIDH_ALTSEAN BURMA Recommendations Concerning EU-BurmaMyanmar Investment Relations
11/24
FIDH/ALTSEAN-Burma FIDHs Recommendations concerning EU-Burma/myanmar investments relations / 11
1. Preliminary reforms in Burma/Myanmar
Before beginning or at the very early stages of the negotiations on an investment agreement
with the government of Burma/Myanmar, the EU should negotiate and conclude a time-boundand benchmarked roadmap. The roadmap should identify the priority reforms that Burma/
Myanmar should undertake to ensure that investments respect human rights.
a. A roadmap for priority reforms
The EU should negotiate with the government of Burma/Myanmar a time-bound and
benchmarked roadmap that aims at creating an environment conducive to greater respect
of human rights. The EU should monitor the implementation of the roadmap using precise
indicators. The conclusion of the investment agreement should be delayed until adequate
progress in the implementation of the road map is achieved. The roadmap should contain at
least the following:
- The opening of a UN Ofce of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)
ofce in Burma/Myanmar with a full mandate of protection and promotion of human rights
throughout the country, including monitoring, reporting and recommendations activities.
- Ratication of key international instruments. Burma/Myanmar has ratied only few
international conventions protecting human rights, namely the Convention to Eliminate All
Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), the Convention on the Rights of the
Child (CRC), the ILO convention 29 and 87, and the UN Convention Against Corruption.
The ratication of other key international conventions will show the commitment of the
government of Burma/Myanmar to human rights, and should facilitate the monitoring of
the human rights situation in the country, through the relevant protection mechanisms. The
relevant conventions include at least the following:
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and its optional protocol
Convention Against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or
Punishment and its optional protocol
International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination
Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of
children in armed conicts
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide
International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid
Rome Statute creating the international criminal court
Minimum Age for Admission to Employment (ILO convention No 138)
Prohibition and Immediate Action for the Elimination of the Worst Forms of Child Labour
(ILO convention No 182)
Abolition of Forced Labour (ILO convention No 105)
Equal Remuneration for Men and Women Workers for Work of Equal Value (ILO convention
No 100)
-
8/13/2019 FIDH_ALTSEAN BURMA Recommendations Concerning EU-BurmaMyanmar Investment Relations
12/24
12 / FIDHs Recommendations concerning EU-Burma/myanmar investments relations FIDH/ALTSEAN-Burma
Discrimination in Respect of Employment and Occupation (ILO convention No 111)
Application of the Principles of the Right to Organise and to Bargain Collectively (ILO
convention No 98)
Indigenous and Tribal Peoples (ILO convention No. 169)
Protection of Wages (ILO convention No. 95)
- Review, amendment or repealing of legislations that is not in line with international
standards or have been used to restrict or violate human rights. These laws include:
- The 2008 Constitution: The military-drafted constitution, approved during a sham
referendum in May 2008, contains several clauses that allow the government to use existing
draconian laws to severely limit basic human rights and fundamental freedoms. The following
articles are particularly concerning:
- Article 353: Nothing shall, except in accord with existing laws, be detrimental
to the life and personal freedom of any person.
- Article 354: Every citizen shall be at liberty in the exercise of the following
rights, if not contrary to the laws, enacted for Union security, prevalence, law
and order, community peace and tranquility or public order and morality:a)
to express and publish freely their convictions and opinions; b) to assemble
peacefully without arms and holding procession; c) to form associations and
organizations.
- Article 376: No person shall, except matters on precautionary measures
taken for the security of the Union or prevalence of law and order, peaceand tranquility in accordance with the law in the interest of the public, or the
matters permitted according to an existing law, be held in custody for more
than 24 hours without the remand of a competent magistrate.
- Article 445: [] No proceeding shall be instituted against [] any member
thereof or any member of the Government, in respect of any act done in the
execution of their respective duties.
- Section 401 of the Criminal Procedure code:This section prescribes that offenders
who have been granted parole can be re-arrested and forced to serve the remainder of their
original jail sentence if they violate any laws. The government has routinely released political
prisoners under Section 401 of the Criminal as a way of dissuading them from carrying outpolitical activities.
- The Criminal Code:Sections 141, 143, 145, 151, 152, 505, 505(b) and 295-A, vague
worded referring to offences against the State or against public tranquility for example.
- The Unlawful Association Act (1908): The Unlawful Association Act makes it an
offence, punishable with two to three years in prison, to have contact with any organization
that the regime declares as illegal. Under this law, an association on that interferes or has
for its object interference with the administration of the law and with the maintenance of law
and order, or that it constitutes as a danger to the public peace, may be deemed illegal. The
government has frequently used the Unlawful Association Act to jail activists who had ties with
exiled pro-democracy organizations.
- The Emergency Provisions Act (1950): Under this law it is an offence, punishable with
imprisonment of up to seven years, to commit any act which violates or infringes upon the
-
8/13/2019 FIDH_ALTSEAN BURMA Recommendations Concerning EU-BurmaMyanmar Investment Relations
13/24
FIDH/ALTSEAN-Burma FIDHs Recommendations concerning EU-Burma/myanmar investments relations / 13
integrity, health, conduct and respect of State military organizations and government employees
towards the[ ] government, or causes or intends to disrupt the morality or the behavior of
a group of people, or the general public.Due to its ambiguity, it confers sweeping powers on
the authorities to quell real or imagined dissent. It has been regularly used to put hundreds of
NLD, monks, students, and activists behind bars. Its Section 5 has been frequently invoked tojail dissidents (in particular, section 5(j), which says that any act likely to affect the morality
or conduct of the public or a group of people in a way that would undermine the security of
the Union or the restoration of law and order, is considered an offence, punishable with up to
seven years in prison).This law also limits the right to appeal and circumvents the requirement
that all detainees be informed of the reason for their arrest and be brought quickly brought
before a judge.
- The State Protection Law (1975): The State Protection Law gives the authorities the
power to detain anyone suspected of having committed, committing, or being about to commit
an act endangering the sovereignty and security of the state or public peace and tranquility.
The law does not specify a denition for what constitutes an act that endangers state security. In
addition, it allows an offender to be imprisoned for up to ve years without trial on the ordersof the executive. Unlike the Emergency Provisions Act, the State Protection Law can only
legally be utilized in a state of emergency. However, the government used the State Protection
Law to detain Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and other dissidents despite no declaration of a state of
emergency.
- The Law relating to forming of organizations (1988): This law punishes with a prison
term of up to ve years anyone who is found guilty of forming an organization that attempts,
instigates, incites, abets or commits acts that may in any way disrupt law and order, peace and
tranquility.
- The Television & Video Law (1996): The Television and Video Law imposes heavy
restrictions on the freedom of expression in Burma/Myanmar. The law requires the licensing ofall television sets, video cassette recorders, and satellite television. The law makes it compulsory
for every video tape shown in Burma/Myanmar to include a censorship certicate, which must
be exhibited at every screening of the tape. Under the law, all video businesses must obtain a
license from the Video Business Supervisory Committee, which also has the authority to carry
out on-site inspections. Those found in violation of the law face imprisonment for up to three
years and nes of up to 100,000 kyat (approx. US$102), or both.
- The Electronics Transactions Law (2004):The Electronics Transactions Law (ETL)
punishes with a prison sentence ranging from seven to 15 years anyone who commits any
act detrimental to the security of the State or prevalence of law and order or community peace
and tranquility using electronic media (computer, fax, e-mail, telegraph, telex, etc). The same
penalty range applies to anyone who is convicted for receiving, sending, and distributing inelectronic form any information relating to secrets of the security of the State or prevalence
of law and order or community peace and tranquility.The government has often used the ETL
to imprison activists, bloggers, and journalists who expressed their opposition to the regime
through the use of websites, e-mails, and similar forms of electronic communication.
- The Peaceful Gathering and Demonstration Law (2012): Article 18 of the law
prescribes up to one year in prison for those who demonstrate without obtaining the authorities
prior permission. Authorities have frequently refused to issue protest permits to activists,
farmers, and human rights defenders. Since the law was enacted in July 2102 the government
has sentenced at least 29 in connection with unauthorized peaceful protesters across Burma/
Myanmar.
- The Citizenship Law (1982): The law effectively denied citizenship to approximately
800,000 Rohingya in Arakan/Rakhine State because it does not recognize them as one of
-
8/13/2019 FIDH_ALTSEAN BURMA Recommendations Concerning EU-BurmaMyanmar Investment Relations
14/24
14 / FIDHs Recommendations concerning EU-Burma/myanmar investments relations FIDH/ALTSEAN-Burma
the 135 indigenous races of Burma/Myanmar. Under this law, Rohingya could be granted
citizenship if they could prove that their ancestors had settled in Burma/Myanmar before 1823
an excessively onerous requirement for the overwhelming majority of Rohingya.
- The Printers & Publishers Registration Law (1962): This law requires all books,magazines, periodicals, song lyrics, and lm scripts to be approved by the government Press
Scrutiny and Registration Division prior to publication or distribution. An offence under this law
is punishable with up to seven years imprisonment and a ne In January 2003, the government
replaced its Censorship Board with a very similar body called the Central Supervisory
Committee for Registration and Distribution of Printers and Publishers (CSCRDPP). The
12-member committee, which includes ofcials from the Information, Defence, and Home
Affairs ministries as well as members of police and military intelligence, is responsible for
monitoring publications and issuing, suspending, and revoking publishing licenses.
In addition to the ratications of the international instruments and the pursuit of legislative
reform, the government of Burma/Myanmar must implement the following priorities in order
to ensure that investments respect human rights:
- Order an immediate end to all Tatmadaw military operationsin ethnic areas and a
progressive troop withdrawal from conict-affected areas;
- Promote a time-bound, genuine, and inclusive political dialogue with all ethnic armed
groups;
- Take effective measures to end and prevent recurrence of impunity and protect
civilians from human rights violations;
- Grant local and international organizations free and unfettered access to IDP camps
in KIA controlled areas in Kachin State. Facilitate unimpeded access to all IDPsaffected by unrest in Arakan/Rakhine State and take effective action against those who
intimidate humanitarian agencies;
Support the establishment of an independent international investigation into recent anti-
Muslim violencein the country;
- Unconditionally release all remaining political prisoners, including hundreds of
Rohingya arbitrarily detained in Arakan/Rakhine State and repeal legislation used
to arbitrarily detain and imprison activists, human rights defenders, and members of
ethnic and religious minorities;
-
Enact legislative and institutional reforms to ensure the protection of land andhousing rights,
- Enact legislative and institutional reforms to reduce the occurrence of corruption,
including measures to protect whistle blowers;
- Undertake the required reforms to ensure transparency of extractive resource revenue
and take all other necessary steps to join the Extractive Industries Transparency
Initiative (EITI).
-
8/13/2019 FIDH_ALTSEAN BURMA Recommendations Concerning EU-BurmaMyanmar Investment Relations
15/24
FIDH/ALTSEAN-Burma FIDHs Recommendations concerning EU-Burma/myanmar investments relations / 15
b. Technical/nancial assistance and roadmap implementation monitoring
The EU should provide technical and nancial assistance in order to support the full
implementation of the roadmap for priority reforms. The EU should monitor the implementation
of the roadmap using clear and specic indicators. To this end, the EU should:
- Ensure that the roadmap is made public.
- Design clear and specic indicators in consultation with the government and civil
society in Burma/Myanmar (for example the ght against impunity requires not
only legislative reforms, but also an increased number of public declarations by the
authorities condemning violence, increased number of complaints, condemnations,
etc. On land, it requires in addition of regulatory reforms, number of consultations
conducted, impacts assessment realized, their publication, reduction of violence,
detention and due process against protestors and human rights defenders, increasing
number of complaints introduced by victims, etc.).
- Carry out and publicize regular assessments of the implementation of the roadmap, and
consult civil society to that end.
2. A binding framework for EU companies investing in Burma/myanmar
The EU should develop a binding normative framework in order to ensure the European
companies that conduct activities in Burma/Myanmar respect human rights as set forth in the
UNGPs and OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises.
Given the countrys high level of corruption and abysmal human rights record, self-regulating
company codes of conduct would be woefully inadequate in Burma/Myanmar. The EU
should reinforce its legal framework and require member states to enact relevant legislation in
order to:
- Make human rights due diligence mandatory for EU-based companies. Companies should
identify, prevent, mitigate, and account for the human rights impact and risks of their
activities, including operations conducted through their supply chains;
- Adopt clear and mandatory requirements for the disclosure of EU-based companies
activities and impact assessments related to on human rights and the environment,
including throughout their supply chain.
- Ensure full transparency of companies activities by requiring disclosure of details ofinvestments (including of contracts) and all business relationships including the list of
suppliers of companies sourcing from Burma/Myanmar. This information should be
made accessible to all local stakeholders, including affected communities;
- Ensure compliance with anti- corruption measures;
- Require investors to carry out initial and ongoing human rights due diligence including
human rights impact assessments of their operations;
- Require companies to publish periodic reports on their human rights policies,
environmental and social risks, the impacts of their activities, and measures taken to
mitigate negative impacts, prior to, during, and after their operations;
- Ensure that affected individuals/communities have access to effective remedies and
-
8/13/2019 FIDH_ALTSEAN BURMA Recommendations Concerning EU-BurmaMyanmar Investment Relations
16/24
16 / FIDHs Recommendations concerning EU-Burma/myanmar investments relations FIDH/ALTSEAN-Burma
facilitate victims access to courts in EU home countries of companies active in Burma/
Myanmar. Require disclosure of all payments made by companies to the Burma/Myanmar
authorities.
The EU should put in place a centralized mechanism to gather the above-mentioned informationand monitor the respect of the process of human rights due diligence.
Notwithstanding the absence of legal requirements on mandatory due diligence and non-
nancial reporting, companies operating in Burma/Myanmar should be encouraged to:
- Conduct human rights due diligence, including through the conduct of human rights
impact assessments of their activities, in consultation with potentially affected rights-
holders including workers and communities as well as local civil society; and publicly
report on those processes;
- Urge the authorities in Burma/Myanmar to implement reforms and create a legislative
and institutional framework conducive to responsible investment;
- Avoid encouraging or participating in the repression of those who oppose or protesting
their activities and operations;
- Avoid any business relationships with individuals or companies that have been linked to
human rights abuses in Burma/Myanmar;
- Collaborate fully with legitimate and effective remedy mechanisms for victims of human
rights abuses stemming from their operations.
3. Human rights impact assessment
At the early stages of the negotiations of an investment agreement, the EU must carry out a
human rights impact assessment of investments in Burma/Myanmar.
As outlined by the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to food 1, human rights impact
assessments are the best way to ensure that investment agreements are consistent with human
rights obligations and to remove incompatibility before the agreement is signed or ratied (by
the adoption of measures at the domestic level and/or by the introduction within the agreement
itself clauses, such as exibilities or exceptions if appropriated).
The human rights impact assessment should be conducted in line with the Guiding Principles
on Human Rights Impact Assessments of Trade and Investment Agreements2. The EuropeanCommission, external trade Handbook for Trade Sustainability Impact assessment (March
2006) and the Operational Guidance on Taking Account of Fundamental Rights in Commission
Impact Assessments (adopted in May 2011) could inspire the methodology to be used, but
compared to the past and current impact assessment (IA) and sustainable impact assessment
carried out (SIA), signicant improvements are needed.
The human rights impact assessment should:
- measure the potential impact of an investment agreement on human rights outcomes and
on the capacity of States and non-State actors to meet their human rights obligations, as
1. A/HRC/19/59/&dd.5, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to food, Olivier De Schutter, Addendum, Guiding
Principles On Human Rights Impact Assessments of Trade and Investment Agreements, December 20112. Olivier De Schutter, December 2011 A/HRC/19/59/&dd.5, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to food,Addendum
-
8/13/2019 FIDH_ALTSEAN BURMA Recommendations Concerning EU-BurmaMyanmar Investment Relations
17/24
FIDH/ALTSEAN-Burma FIDHs Recommendations concerning EU-Burma/myanmar investments relations / 17
well as on the capacity of individuals to enjoy their rights;
- be based explicitly on the normative content of human rights, as claried by the judicial
and non-judicial bodies that are tasked with monitoring compliance with human rights
obligations and to be based on efcient consultations and international expertise.
- be conducted through genuine, transparent, and inclusive consultations that ensure the
participation of the widest range of stakeholders, including affected communities. The
process should include:
o Preparatory rounds of consultations with international experts, including:
academics; members of international organisations (ILO, UN, OECD);
businesses investing in Burma/Myanmar; associations of employers; trade
unions representatives of European institutions (European Parliament,
European Economic and Social Committee, European Commission, COASI,
COHOM, EEAS); representatives from local communities potentially
affected, and human rights NGOs;
o eld studies and fact-nding missions;
o review and assessment of the measures taken by the EU and by businesses
investing in Burma/Myanmar to respect, protect, and full human rights;
- The human rights impact assessment should be prepared by a body or group of experts
who are independent from the European Commission.
- The contractor - under the scrutiny of the Steering Committee, the EP, and the Council
- shall ensure that all relevant stakeholders are both aware of and able to contribute to
the consultations. Consultation should involve all communities potentially affected bybusiness operations and specic attention must be paid to their right to receive timely and
thorough information, also in their own language. A genuine dialogue should be created
to avoid simple information processing and to ne-tune recommendations, collect factual
data, validate hypothesis, gather evidence and build-in quality checks.
The on-line consultations and interviews carried by the Commission in mid-July, are regrettably
insufcient in that regard.
4. An agreement that efficiently protects and respects human rights
An investment agreement should:
- Be subsequent to the necessary progress in the implementation of the roadmap for priority
reforms, and be based on the conclusions drawn by the human rights impact assessment;
- be based on a fully transparent and participatory processes of negotiation;
- not contain any incompatibility with human rights;
- include specic clauses that ensure the protection of human rights and the ability of Burma/
Myanmar to regulate in order to protect, respect and full its human rights obligation. To
this end, FIDH and Altsean Burma call on the EU to ensure:
Inclusion of binding and enforceable human rights provisions, including social and
environmental provisions
-
8/13/2019 FIDH_ALTSEAN BURMA Recommendations Concerning EU-BurmaMyanmar Investment Relations
18/24
18 / FIDHs Recommendations concerning EU-Burma/myanmar investments relations FIDH/ALTSEAN-Burma
- The promotion, protection, respect, and fullment of human rights should be included
among the objectives of the investment agreement;
- Include Human rights clauses that import in the investment agreement the international
standards as binding and enforceable commitments, that guarantee respects of human rights,and that allow the parties to invalidate, suspend, derogate or adapt the agreement provisions
if there is a warranted suspicion that they are contributing to human rights violations. The
clause should refer to the international obligations of the parties only if Burma/Myanmar
has ratied the above mentioned conventions. If not, it should refer explicitly to relevant
the international instruments3.
- Failure to respect human rights and implement international conventions on human rights
by parties to the treaty or investors should be subject to an appropriate dispute settlement
mechanism. Third parties (such as trade unions, affected communities, and human rights
NGOs) should be enabled to submit evidence or arguments before the mechanism.
- Encourage cooperation between treaty Parties to provide enhanced environmental, humanrights and labour protection and hold expert consultations on such matters.
- A rendez-vous clause should be adopted that prescribes regular ex-post human rights impact
assessments (HRIAs) and allow revisions of problematic provisions of the agreement in
light of the assessments ndings. UN human rights institutions should be involved, as
should independent civil society representatives. The ex-post HRIAs should study the
respect of the human rights obligations by the parties and assess the extent to which the
investment agreement contributes to achieving expected results in terms of enhancing
human rights. They should also investigate the results of the anking measures, investigate
the causes when shortcomings and lead to dedicated procedures to adapt the obligations of
the parties if needed.
- The agreement mechanism should set up a mechanism aimed at strengthening the
implementation of its human rights provisions. Under this mechanism, international
experts, representatives of affected communities, human rights NGOs, should hold
regular consultations, channel proposals to improve the HRIAs, and introduce complaints
procedures.
Clauses under investment treaties, if drafted too broadly, can limit the right of host states
to regulate in the public interest. As a result, the investment agreement should:
- Insert a clause stating that the agreement can not be interpreted as restricting the right of
state parties to regulate in order to protect, respect and full human rights. It must be clear
that those activities should prevail on the defence of the interests of investors and do notconstitute a violation of the agreement or an expropriation.
- Indicate that the promotion and protection of investments should be pursued in compliance
with the parties obligations under international law, including their obligations with respect
3. At least the following ones : Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the core ILO labor conventions.
The human rights clause should also state: Respect for human rights, democratic principles and the rule of law, as
laid down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,
the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the core ILO labour conventions and other
international obligations and commitments of the parties underpin the present agreement, underpin the domestic andinternational policies of the Parties and constitute the essential elements of this Agreement as well as If a Party
considers that the other Party has failed to full an obligation under the Agreement, it may take appropriate measures.Before doing so, except in cases of special urgency, as it the case in case of allegation of violation of one of the essential
elements of the Agreement, it shall invite the other Party to hold consultations that focus on the measures taken or tobe taken by the Party concerned to remedy the situation.
-
8/13/2019 FIDH_ALTSEAN BURMA Recommendations Concerning EU-BurmaMyanmar Investment Relations
19/24
FIDH/ALTSEAN-Burma FIDHs Recommendations concerning EU-Burma/myanmar investments relations / 19
to human rights, labour rights, and protection of the environment.
- Stipulate that in case of a conict between the investment agreement and a host states
international commitments with regard to the protection of human rights, environment, and
public health, the latter shall prevail.
- Include a binding clause that commit the parties not to lower human rights, environmental,
and labour standards to attract or encourage investment4.
Most investment agreements provide extensive protection for investors but only impose
obligations on states. In order to protect human rights, any future investment agreement
between the EU and Burma/Myanmar should:
- Include a human rights binding clause that states that investors must respect international
human rights instruments, including the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human
Rights, and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises.
- If investors violate human rights it should be possible to use the general dispute settlement
mechanism to solve the conict. If a solution cannot be reached, sanctions in the form of
substantial nes should be imposed after the general dispute resolution mechanisms have
been exhausted. It should allow amicus curiae5.
- Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanisms have been rightly criticized as a
powerful tool which has been abused to challenge measures meant to promote the public
interest and thus interfering with legitimate policies and policy-making. It has displayed
serious shortcomings (e.g. inconsistent and unintended interpretations of clauses,
unanticipated uses of the system by investors, challenges against policy measures taken in
the public interest, costly and lengthy procedures, limited or no transparency). In line with
the position of ETUC6
, FIDH and Altsean recommend to not set up Investor-State DisputeSettlement and to provide the only State-to-state dispute resolution to guarantee the crucial
role of governments in determining and protecting the public interest. If the EU continues
to support ISDS, it should allow for full transparency over the proceedings, amicus curiae
by any interested or relevant third party, and deny to investors the protections afforded by
the treaty when they fail to respect human rights. Arbitration panels should include human
rights experts.
4. See also the recommendations concerning MFN, NT, FES, FPS etc. laid down in the ETUC Resolution on EU
Investment Policy: http://www.etuc.org/a/110255. ETUC Resolution on EU Investment Policy: http://www.etuc.org/a/110256. ETUC Resolution on EU Investment Policy: http://www.etuc.org/a/11025
-
8/13/2019 FIDH_ALTSEAN BURMA Recommendations Concerning EU-BurmaMyanmar Investment Relations
20/24
20 / FIDHs Recommendations concerning EU-Burma/myanmar investments relations FIDH/ALTSEAN-Burma
Background documents
- A/HRC/19/59/Add.5, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to food, Olivier De
Schutter, Addendum, Guiding principles on human rights impact assessments of trade and
investment agreements, December 2011
- ETUC Resolution on EU Investment Policy: http://www.etuc.org/a/11025
- European Parliament resolution of 13 June 2013 on the situation of Rohingya Muslims
- European Parliament resolution of 23 May 2013 on reinstatement of Myanmar/Burmas
access to generalised tariff preferences
- European Parliament resolution of 16 April 2013 on trade and investment-driven growthfor developing countries
- European Parliament resolution of 13 December 2012 on the review of the EUs human
rights strategy
- European Parliament resolution of 25 November 2010 on human rights and social and
environmental standards in international trade agreements
- Council of the European Union, 11855/12, EU Strategic Framework and Action Plan on
Human Rights and Democracy, 25 June 2012
-
8/13/2019 FIDH_ALTSEAN BURMA Recommendations Concerning EU-BurmaMyanmar Investment Relations
21/24
FIDH/ALTSEAN-Burma FIDHs Recommendations concerning EU-Burma/myanmar investments relations / 21
-
8/13/2019 FIDH_ALTSEAN BURMA Recommendations Concerning EU-BurmaMyanmar Investment Relations
22/24
22 / FIDHs Recommendations concerning EU-Burma/myanmar investments relations FIDH/ALTSEAN-Burma
This publication has been produced with the assistance of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the
Netherlands. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of FIDH and ALTSEAN-Burma.
-
8/13/2019 FIDH_ALTSEAN BURMA Recommendations Concerning EU-BurmaMyanmar Investment Relations
23/24
Keep your eyes open
Establishing the factsInvestigative and trial observation missions
Through activities ranging from sending trial observers toorganising international investigative missions, FIDH has
developed, rigorous and impartial procedures to establish
facts and responsibility. Experts sent to the field give their
time to FIDH on a voluntary basis.
FIDH has conducted more than 1 500 missions in over 100
countries in the past 25 years. These activities reinforce FIDHs
alert and advocacy campaigns.
Supporting civil societyTraining and exchange
FIDH organises numerous activities in partnership with its
member organisations, in the countries in which they arebased. The core aim is to strengthen the influence and capacity
of human rights activists to boost changes at the local level.
Mobilising the international communityPermanent lobbying before intergovernmental bodies
FIDH supports its member organisations and local partnersin their efforts before intergovernmental organisations. FIDH
alerts international bodies to violations of human rights and
refers individual cases to them. FIDH also takes part inthe
development of international legal instruments.
Informing and reportingMobilising public opinion
FIDH informs and mobilises public opinion. Press releases,
press conferences, open letters to authorities, mission reports,
urgent appeals, petitions, campaigns, website FIDH makes
full use of all means of communication to raise awareness of
human rights violations.
ALTSEAN BurmaAlternative Asean Network on Burma campaigns, advocacy and capacity-building for human rights.The EU has expressed its willingness to conclude an investment agreement with Burma/Myanmar. But Burma/Myanmar faces weak
legislative framework, a pattern of systematic human rights violations associated to business activities, as well as corruption and
a lack of an independent judiciary. Highlighting the risks for investments to be linked to human rights violations, this paper issues
recommandations to the EU on the measures to be taken in order to ensure that it complies with its human rights obligations.
PO BOX 296 - Lardprao Post Ofce, 10310 Bangkok, Thailand
Phone # : +66 81 850 9008
Fax # : +66 2 275 4261
E-mail: [email protected]
Imprimerie de la FIDH - Dpt lgal janvier 2014 - FIDH (English ed.) ISSN 2225-1804 - Fichier informatique conforme la loi du 6 janvier 1978 (Dclaration N330 675)
Director of the publication: Karim Lahidji
Editor: Antoine Bernard
Authors: Gaelle Dusepulchre (desk UE), Andrea Giorgetta (desk asean )Coordination: Antoine madelin
Design: CBT
FIDH - International Federation for Human Rights17, passage de la Main-dOr - 75011 Paris - France
CCP Paris : 76 76 ZTel: (33-1) 43 55 25 18 / Fax: (33-1) 43 55 18 80
www.fidh.org
-
8/13/2019 FIDH_ALTSEAN BURMA Recommendations Concerning EU-BurmaMyanmar Investment Relations
24/24
human or degrading treatment or punishment. Article 6: Everyone
as the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law. Article 7: All are equal before the law and are entitled without any
scrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration
nd against any incitementto such discrimination. Article 8: Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national
bunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law. Article 9: No one shall be subjected to
bitrary arrest, detention or exile. Article 10: Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and
mpartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him. Article 11: (1) Everyone
harged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty
ABOUT FIDH
FIDH takes action for the protection of victims of human rights violations, for the
prevention of violations and to bring perpetrators to justice.
A broad mandate
FIDH works for the respect of all the rights set out in the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights: civil and political rights, as well as economic, social and cultural
rights.
A universal movement
FIDH was established in 1922, and today unites 178 member organisations in
more than 100 countries around the world. FIDH coordinates and supports their
activities and provides them with a voice at the international level.
An independent organisation
Like its member organisations, FIDH is not linked to any party or religion and is
independent of all governments.
FIDH
human rights organisationson
represents178continents5