FIC 2017 Poster: Targeted Peptide Indentification for the ... Detection of Soy Proteins in ... two...

1
Target Peptide Identification for the Mass Spectrometric Detection of Soy Proteins in Food Matrices INTRODUCTION Soybeans are one of the “Big eight” allergenic foods in the US, with soy allergies affecting approximately 0.4% of children. 1 Because of their functional properties and high protein content (~38%), soybeans have been widely used in various food products such as baked foods (e.g. cookies, crackers), beverages, and meat products in the forms of soy flour, soy protein isolates, and soy protein concentrates. Mass spectrometry (MS) is playing an increasingly important role in allergen detection and quantification since it has shown better performance in allergen quantification, in some cases, compared with other technologies such as ELISA. The objective of the current study was to identify and evaluate target peptides from a variety of soy-derived ingredients for the parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) detection of soy protein in foods. OVERVIEW Comparison of protein profiles of six commercial soy ingredients Selection of target peptides for the soy ingredients Comparison of abundance of the selected peptides across six soy ingredients MATERIALS AND METHODS Tryptic digestion and LC-MS/MS Extraction method Soy sample in buffer (1:20 w:v) (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.6, with 6 M Urea, 20 mM DTT, and 1% PVPP) Heat at 60 °C for 30 min Sonicate at RT for 10 min Obtain supernatant Centrifuge at 13,000 x g for 10 min Quantify protein by Thermo Scientific™ Pierce™ 660 nm Protein Assay Reagent Soy ingredients information 5 μL of 20- fold diluted sample Alkylation Reduction Digestion C18 Spin Column clean-up Acronym Product type Processing method Composition NRSF Non-roasted soy flour Minimally heat processed RSF Roasted soy flour Fully heat treated SPI-A Soy protein isolate SPI-B Soy protein isolate Hydrolyzed SPC-A Soy protein concentrate SPC-B Soy protein concentrate RESULTS Figure 2. SDS-PAGE gel of six commercial soy ingredients with three extraction buffers Buffer P 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 50 mM Tris-HCl, 6 M Urea 250 150 100 75 50 37 25 20 15 10 5 kD a M W N R SF RSF SPI -B SPI -A SPC -A SPC -B 250 150 100 75 50 37 25 20 15 10 5 kD a Buffer M Buffer N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 91 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 M W 50 mM Tris-HCl, 6 M Urea, 1% PVPP, 20 mM DTT 50 mM Tris-HCl, 6 M Urea, 1% PVPP N R SF RSF SPI -A SPI -B SPC -A SPC -B 250 150 100 75 50 37 25 20 15 10 5 kD a N R SF RSF SPI -A SPI -B SPC -A SPC -B M W Major protein (258) No “M” (228) Std<1.5 (124) Unique, conserved (57) High confidence (149) 6-25 aa (180) All detectable peptides (15332) Criteria for target peptides selection: (1) belongs to major seed storage proteins (2) does not contain methionine (3) 6-25 aa (4) high confidence (5) the standard deviation of peak area between all soy ingredients is less than 1.5 (6) unique amino acid sequence (7) conserved among protein isoforms (8) have good performance at low concentration Figure 3. Target peptide selection a. Example of target peptide selection b. Visualization of target peptide identification for soy protein, number of peptides is given in brackets Figure 1. SDS-PAGE comparison of protein extraction efficacy from unroasted soy flour 50 mM Ammonium Bicarbonate pH 8.0 Tris-HCl 1 M Gu-HCl or 6 M urea Gu-HCl Urea Gu-HCl 1% (w:v) PVPP + + - - + + - - + + 20 mM DTT + - + - + - + - + - Buffer A B C D E F G H I J 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.6) PBS 1 M Gu-HCl or 6 M urea Gu-HCl Urea 1% (w:v) PVPP - - + + - - 20 mM DTT + - + - + - Buffer K L M N O P Q A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q MW MW MW MW 250 150 100 75 50 37 25 20 15 10 5 kD a 250 150 100 75 50 37 25 20 15 10 5 kD a 250 150 100 75 50 37 25 20 15 10 5 kD a 250 150 100 75 50 37 25 20 15 10 5 kD a Protein Sequence Contain Cysteine? Contain Methionine? Soy- specific peptide? number of soy ingredients can detect the peptide Identified as a potential target peptide? 2S albumin ELINLATMCR Yes Yes Yes 6 2S albumin KQLQGVNLTPCEK Yes Yes 6 Yes Basic 7S globulin LMVFDLAR Yes Yes 6 Glycinin G2 (A2B1a) GKQQEEENEGSNILSGFAPEFLK Yes 5 β-conglycinin alpha chain LITLAIPVNKPGR Yes 6 Yes a b CONCLUSIONS Buffers M, N, P (50 mM Tris - HCl with 6 M Urea) have shown the optimal extraction effect among all of the buffers. The protein profiles of most soy ingredients are very similar to each other except for the SPI - B (soy protein isolate - B ), which contains mostly low molecular weight peptides. 57 peptides that satisfy a set of pre - determined criteria were selected for future targeted MS analysis. FUTURE STUDIES Optimize extraction and digestion methods for the food matrices test. Evaluate quantitative performance of the selected target peptides. Develop a quantitative Parallel Reaction Monitoring (PRM) method using isotopically labeled internal standards. Reference: 1. Savage, J. H., Kaeding, A. J., Matsui, E. C. and Wood, R. A. The natural history of soy allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010, 125, 683–686. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research is part of a collaboration between FARRP/UNL and Thermo Fisher Scientific. Mass spectrometry was conducted on a Thermo Scientific™ Q Exactive™ Hybrid Quadrupole - Orbitrap mass spectrometer placed at UNL. Figure 5. Peptide performance at each level of on-column total peptide content (sample: NRSF, two soy digests with duplicate injections) Figure 4. Comparison of abundance of selected peptides across six soy ingredients QLQ KQL SVA VGF CLD NLQ RPS VFD GKQ KPQ LSA LSA NLQ NNN QQE SQS VFD NNN IST KQI QGQ QIV FNE HFL QFG DTV NSW TSN VLI VSD FES LIT LQE NIL NIL SRD TIS VPS AIV DIE FES LQE QQQ SQS VLF AIL DLD ESY IPA KTI NFL NPI QEE QKQ QQE SPQ SRN TIS -4.5 -4.0 -3.5 -3.0 -2.5 -2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 Log2(Peak area ratio) Y axis indicates Log 2 (Peak area of the peptide in the specified soy ingredient / peak area of the same peptide in unroasted soy flour), x axis indicates the first three amino acid of each peptide and the protein it belongs to. Peptide TISSEDEPFNLR 10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 7 10 8 On-column total peptide content (ng) Peak Area LSAQYGSLR 10 -2 10 -1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 3 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 7 10 8 On-column total peptide content (ng) Peak Area LC-MS/MS (Thermo Scientific™ Q Exactive™ MS) Shimin Chen 1 , Charles Yang 2 , and Melanie Downs 1 1 Food Allergy Research & Resource Program, Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA 2 Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA RSF SPI-A SPI-B SPC-A SPC-B PO72461-EN 0717S

Transcript of FIC 2017 Poster: Targeted Peptide Indentification for the ... Detection of Soy Proteins in ... two...

Page 1: FIC 2017 Poster: Targeted Peptide Indentification for the ... Detection of Soy Proteins in ... two soy digests with ... FNE HFL QFG DTV NSW TSN VLI VSD FES LIT LQE NIL NIL SRD TIS

Target Peptide Identification for the Mass Spectrometric Detection of Soy Proteins in

Food Matrices

INTRODUCTION• Soybeans are one of the “Big eight” allergenic foods in the US, with soy allergies affecting approximately 0.4% of children.1• Because of their functional properties and high protein content (~38%), soybeans have been widely used in various food products such as baked foods

(e.g. cookies, crackers), beverages, and meat products in the forms of soy flour, soy protein isolates, and soy protein concentrates.• Mass spectrometry (MS) is playing an increasingly important role in allergen detection and quantification since it has shown better performance in allergen

quantification, in some cases, compared with other technologies such as ELISA. • The objective of the current study was to identify and evaluate target peptides from a variety of soy-derived ingredients for the parallel reaction monitoring

(PRM) detection of soy protein in foods.

OVERVIEW• Comparison of protein profiles of six commercial

soy ingredients• Selection of target peptides for the soy ingredients• Comparison of abundance of the selected peptides

across six soy ingredients

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tryptic digestion and LC-MS/MS

Extraction method

Soy sample in buffer(1:20 w:v)

(50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.6, with 6 M Urea, 20 mM DTT, and 1% PVPP)

Heat at 60 °C for 30 min

Sonicate at RT for 10 min

Obtain supernatant

Centrifuge at 13,000 x g for

10 min

Quantify protein by Thermo Scientific™

Pierce™ 660 nm Protein Assay

Reagent

Soy ingredients information

5 μL of 20-fold diluted

sample

AlkylationReduction Digestion C18 Spin Column clean-up

Acronym Product type Processing method Composition

NRSF Non-roasted soy flour Minimally heat processed

RSF Roasted soy flour Fully heat treated SPI-A Soy protein isolateSPI-B Soy protein isolate HydrolyzedSPC-A Soy protein concentrate SPC-B Soy protein concentrate

RESULTS

Figure 2. SDS-PAGE gel of six commercial soy ingredients with three extraction buffers

Buffer P

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

50 mM Tris-HCl, 6 M Urea

250

150

100 75

50

37

25 20

15 10 5

kDa

MW

NR SF

RSF SPI-B

SPI-A

SPC-A

SPC-B

250

150 100 75

50 37

25 20

15 10 5

kDa

Buffer M Buffer N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

11

12

13

14

MW

50 mM Tris-HCl, 6 M Urea, 1%

PVPP, 20 mM DTT

50 mM Tris-HCl, 6 M Urea,

1% PVPP

NR SF

RSF SPI-A

SPI-B

SPC-A

SPC-B

250

150

100 75

50 37

25 20

15 10 5

kDa

NR SF

RSF SPI-A

SPI-B

SPC-A

SPC-B

MW

Major protein (258)

No “M” (228)

Std<1.5 (124)

Unique, conserved

(57)

High confidence (149)

6-25 aa (180)

All detectable peptides(15332)

Criteria for target peptides selection:(1) belongs to major seed

storage proteins(2) does not contain

methionine (3) 6-25 aa(4) high confidence (5) the standard deviation

of peak area between all soy ingredients is less than 1.5

(6) unique amino acid sequence

(7) conserved among protein isoforms

(8) have good performance at low concentration

Figure 3. Target peptide selection a. Example of target peptide selection b. Visualization of target peptide identification for soy protein, number of peptides is given in brackets

Figure 1. SDS-PAGE comparison of protein extraction efficacy from unroasted soy flour

50 mM Ammonium Bicarbonate pH 8.0 Tris-HCl1 M Gu-HClor 6 M urea Gu-HCl Urea Gu-HCl

1% (w:v)PVPP + + - - + + - - + +

20 mM DTT + - + - + - + - + -Buffer A B C D E F G H I J

50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.6)

PBS

1 M Gu-HCl or 6 M urea Gu-HCl Urea1% (w:v)

PVPP - - + + - -

20 mM DTT + - + - + -Buffer K L M N O P Q

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q MWMWMWMW

250

150

100 75

50

37

25 20

15 10 5

kDa 250

150

100 75

50

37

25 20

15 10 5

kDa250

150

100

75

50

37

25 20

15

10 5

kDa250

150

100 75

50

37

25 20

15

10 5

kDa

Protein Sequence Contain Cysteine?

Contain Methionine?

Soy-specific peptide?

number of soy ingredients

can detect the peptide

Identified as a potential

target peptide?

2S albumin ELINLATMCR Yes Yes Yes 62S albumin KQLQGVNLTPCEK Yes Yes 6 Yes

Basic 7S globulin LMVFDLAR Yes Yes 6Glycinin G2 (A2B1a) GKQQEEENEGSNILSGFAPEFLK Yes 5

β-conglycinin alpha chain LITLAIPVNKPGR Yes 6 Yes

a

b

CONCLUSIONS Buffers M, N, P (50 mM Tris-HCl with 6 M Urea) have shown the optimal extraction effect

among all of the buffers.

The protein profiles of most soy ingredients are very similar to each other except for the SPI-B (soy protein isolate-B), which contains mostly low molecular weight peptides.

57 peptides that satisfy a set of pre-determined criteria were selected for future targeted MS analysis.

FUTURE STUDIES Optimize extraction and digestion methods for the food matrices test.

Evaluate quantitative performance of the selected target peptides.

Develop a quantitative Parallel Reaction Monitoring (PRM) method using isotopically

labeled internal standards.Reference:1. Savage, J. H., Kaeding, A. J., Matsui, E. C. and Wood, R. A. The natural history of soy allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010, 125, 683–686.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThis research is part of a collaboration between FARRP/UNL and Thermo Fisher Scientific. Mass spectrometry was conducted on a Thermo Scientific™ Q Exactive™ Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer placed at UNL.

Figure 5. Peptide performance at each level of on-column total peptide content (sample: NRSF, two soy digests with duplicate injections)

Figure 4. Comparison of abundance of selected peptides across six soy ingredients

QLQ

KQ

LSV

AVG

FC

LDN

LQ RPS VF

DG

KQ

KPQ LS

ALS

AN

LQN

NN

QQ

ESQ

SVF

DN

NN

IST

KQ

IQ

GQ

QIV

FNE

HFL

QFG DTV

NSW TS

NVL

IVS

DFE

SLI

TLQ

EN

ILN

ILSR

DTI

SVP

SA

IVD

IEFE

SLQ

EQ

QQ

SQS

VLF

AIL

DLD ES

YIP

AK

TIN

FL NPI

QEE

QK

QQ

QE

SPQ

SRN

TIS

-4.5-4.0-3.5-3.0-2.5-2.0-1.5-1.0-0.50.00.51.01.52.02.5

Log2

(Pea

k ar

ea r

atio

)

Y axis indicates Log2 (Peak area of the peptide in the specified soy ingredient / peak area of the same peptide in unroasted soy flour), x axis indicates the first three amino acid of each peptide and the protein it belongs to.

Peptide

TISSEDEPFNLR

10-3

10-2

10-1

100

101

102

103

101

102

103

104

105

106

107

108

On-column total peptide content (ng)

Peak

Are

a

LSAQYGSLR

10-2

10-1

100

101

102

103

103

104

105

106

107

108

On-column total peptide content (ng)

Peak

Are

a

LC-MS/MS (Thermo

Scientific™ Q Exactive™ MS)

Shimin Chen1, Charles Yang2, and Melanie Downs11Food Allergy Research & Resource Program, Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA

2Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA

RSFSPI-ASPI-BSPC-ASPC-B

PO72461-EN 0717S