Pet food

www.AllAboutFeed.net ALLABOUTFEED Volume 21, No. 8, 2013 19

Fibrillated cellulose enhances digestion in dogsFaeces volume and consistency are

indicators of the quality of dog foods.

Three independent feeding trials with

dogs show that a fibrillated, cellulose-rich

fibre lowers faeces volume, enhances

digestion and maintains optimum faeces

consistency.

By Anton C. Beynen

In dog food marketing health claims are commonly used. These claims often are not easily understood,

whereas the evidence may be loose or unverifiable. Claims that can be checked by dog owners are probably more effective for determining pur-chasing behaviour. Faeces volume and consistency are indicators of intestinal health and can be qualified by owners. This communication deals with the impact of dietary fibre type, at constant level of dietary crude fibre, on faeces characteristics and digestibility of macronutrients in dogs. Pet food and faecesOwners often inspect the consistency of faeces produced by their dog. Faeces consistency is considered an indicator of food quality in terms of digestibility. Optimum faeces consist-ency refers to well formed stools that are not too moist and loose, and not too dry and hard. Such faeces point at

adequate food digestibility and good intestinal health. Optimum faeces consistency is highly appreciated by dog owners. Many owners also prefer low faeces volume and an associated low defecation frequency.Faeces assessment is critical during the process of developing pet foods. Optimum faeces consistency contrib-utes to the sales success of the food on the market. In feeding trials, faeces quality can be scored consistently and objectively with the use of a grading scale. Faeces can be collected quanti-tatively and weighed to obtain an index of volume. The degree of digestion of macronutrients in the food can be determined as amount of intake minus faecal excretion and can be expressed as percentage of intake, representing the so-called apparent digestibility. Type and amount of fibreFibre can be defined as the portion of the plant cell wall that is resistant to the dog’s digestive enzymes. Industrially produced dog foods contain different

types and amounts of fibre. The fibre component is present in core plant ingredients or is added as a fibre-rich feedstuff on preparation. Dietary fibres can have different physical and physio-logical properties. In contrast to insolu-ble fibres, the soluble fibres form vis-cous solutions and may be largely degraded by the colonic microflora. Thus, insoluble versus soluble fibres are more recovered in faeces.Health claims on regular dog foods or indications for therapeutic foods may highlight the presence of soluble or insoluble fibre. Regarding fibre, com-mercially prepared canine foods are typified by their crude fibre content, which is compulsorily listed in the guar-anteed analysis panel on the packaging. Crude fibre content is determined by boiling an ether-extracted food sample in dilute acid and then in dilute alkali. The combustible, organic residue is the crude fibre fraction. Analysed crude fibre in foods contains variable fractions of cellulose, lignin and hemicelluloses. Clearly, crude fibre analysis yields a

13AAF008z019 19 07-10-13 14:40

Pet food

www.AllAboutFeed.net20 ALLABOUTFEED Volume 21, No. 8, 2013

nonspecific outcome with little physio-logical relevance. It is common practice to assume that crude fibre does not provide energy to dogs. Regular, dry dog foods contain 2-4% crude fibre. Light foods may contain up to 8% and veterinary weight reduction diets have higher levels. When expressed on a dry matter basis, wet dog foods contain similar concentrations of crude fibre. Fibrillated celluloseThe Arbocel preparations of cellulose and lignocellulose (J. Rettenmaier & Söhne GmbH + Co KG, Rosenberg, Germany) are natural, highly purified products, forming a completely insolu-ble fibre network. The cellulose-based fibres are made by a special method to achieve a very fine and defined particle structure. The so-called fibrillation tech-nique produces fibres with high capil-lary effect and surface activity.Arbocel BWW 40 contains only cellu-lose. Controlled research has shown that incorporation of the cellulose prep-aration into chew treats ameliorates dental disease in dogs (Beynen et al., 2010) and that addition to the food reduces hair ball symptoms in cats (Beynen et al., 2011). Arbocel RC contains 46% cellulose, 24% lignin and 16% hemicellulose; the crude fibre con-tent is 66%. The three studies described below demonstrate that inclusion of Arbocel RC in dog food improves digestion, reduces faeces volume and maintains optimum faeces consistency. Fibrillated cellulose versus wheat branWithin the framework of her PhD study

at the Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Ludolph (2007) has used diets containing either wheat bran or Arbocel RC as fibre source. Wheat bran contains about 11% crude fibre. The main fibres in wheat bran are hemicel-lulose (about 28%), cellulose (about 8%) and lignin (about 5%).Adult, female beagle dogs (n=16) with average weight of 12.2 kg were fed the two diets according to a cross-over design. On a group basis, faeces were collected quantitatively for 21 days. The dry foods were based on corn (42.5%) and chicken meal (14.5%). The control diet contained 15% wheat bran which was replaced by 2.7% Arbocel RC, 9.3% wheat flour and 3% greaves in the test diet. The diets contained 3.1 and 3.2% crude fibre. An individually determined amount of food was provided once per day.Acceptance was similar for the two diets. Average weight of fresh faeces was computed as 147 g/day for the wheat-bran diet and 110 g/day for the diet containing Arbocel RC; measured dry matter contents of faeces were 27.6 and 29.0%, respectively. It was calculated that apparent dry matter digestibility was 2.3% units higher for the Arbocel diet. Faeces quality was scored on a 1-4 scale (1 = solid; 2 = optimally formed; 3 = pasta like; 4 = liquid). For the wheat-bran and the Arbocel diet the average faecal scores were found to be 2.3 and 2.2.Another experiment comparing Arbocel RC with wheat bran was carried out by Shiva Kumar and colleagues (2012) at Provimi Animal Nutrition India. The control, extruded, dry food consisted of 69% cereals (wheat flour, wheat bran, corn gluten), 20% poultry meal, 6% fats and oils and 5% premixes. The test diet contained 3% Arbocel RC at the expense of wheat bran. The two diets were iso-nitrogenous and iso-energetic; the analysed crude fibre contents were identical (2.1%). The diets were fed to six adult dogs, weighing 30-42 kg. A cross-over design with periods of 10 days was used. Food was supplied once daily, the amount being equiva-lent to maintenance energy require-ments. During the last five days of each period, faeces were collected.Table 1 documents that the apparent digestibilities of dry matter, crude

protein, crude fat and carbohydrates (nitrogen-free extract) were increased by consumption of Arbocel. The increases are statistically significant. Based on the mean values for amount of food supplied and dry matter digest-ibility, the faecal output of dry matter was calculated. For the control diet and the Arbocel diet, faecal excretion of dry matter was 169 and 149 g/day. When assuming a faecal dry matter content of 28%, the production of fresh faeces for the control and Arbocel diet would be 604 and 532 g/day. Fibrillated cellulose versus beet pulpAt the Free University of Berlin, Kröger et al. (2011) fed eight Beagles dry foods with similar crude fibre content, but containing either sugar beet pulp or Arbocel RC. Dried beet pulp contains 12-18% crude fibre, but has a high con-tent (about 20%) of soluble fibre in the form of pectin. The control diet con-tained 50% rice flour, 31% poultry meal and 12% beet pulp. The test diet con-tained 59.8% rice flour, 30.1% poultry meal and 2.7% Arbocel RC. The control and test diets contained 3.1 and 2.4% of crude fibre. The dogs received each diet for 8-12 weeks. The amount of faeces produced was determined daily. Faeces collected during the last five days of each feeding period were used to measure digestibility of macronutrients.The Arbocel versus beet-pulp diet sig-nificantly reduced the amount of fresh faeces from 168 to 94 g/day and raised the faecal dry matter content from 29.7 to 42.3%. Thus, the output of dry faecal matter was reduced from 50 to 40 g/day. This indicates that Arbocel RC had increased the digestibility of dietary dry matter. Table 1 shows that the feeding of Arbocel RC instead of beet pulp increased the apparent digestibilities of dietary organic matter and crude protein; the differences are statistically significant. Fat digestibility was unaf-fected. Scores for faeces consistency, on a 5-point scale, were 2.1 and 2.3 for the control and test diet.

Volume and consistency When feeding diets with similar content of crude fibre, the intake of Arbocel RC instead of wheat bran or beet pulp reduces fresh faeces output in dogs. The decrease ranged from 12 to 44%

Expt 1 Expt 2 Expt 3

700

500

600

400

300

200

100

0

WB or BP A

Figure 1 - Influence of dietary Arbocel RC on daily output of fresh faeces (g/day) by dogs. Experiments 1 and 2: Arbocel (A) versus wheat bran (WB); experiment 3: Arbocel versus beet pulp (BP). Within experiments, the dry foods contained similar amounts of crude fibre.

13AAF008z020 20 07-10-13 14:40

Pet food

www.AllAboutFeed.net ALLABOUTFEED Volume 21, No. 8, 2013 21

(Figure 1). The impact of dietary fibre type is the sum of the effects caused by the addition of one fibre source and omission of the other. The influence of Arbocel RC may be specific because it is seen in comparison with two different fibre sources. Arbocel is not digestible and poorly fermentable. Thus, ingested Arbocel is excreted and higher intakes induce higher faecal output. However, compared with other fibre types, Arbocel RC lowers faecal output and maintains optimum faeces consistency.The Arbocel-induced lowering of faeces production is explained by the observed increase in dry matter digest-ibility, which in turn is caused by increased digestibility of protein, fat and carbohydrates. Low digestibility of the base diet appears to enhance the promoting effect of Arbocel on diges-tion. The mechanism by which Arbocel stimulates digestion is not known, but it could relate to the formation of spe-cific networks in the intestinal content, leading to enhanced access of diges-tive enzymes to their substrates. Alternatively, wheat bran and beet pulp may inhibit digestion.Pet food quality, as perceived by dog owners, relates to faeces volume and consistency. The three studies described here indicate that dietary fibre type is a determinant of faeces characteristics and digestive efficiency. This knowledge may be implemented in pet food formulation and production. AAF

References are available on request from the author (beynen@freeler.nl)

Digestibility, % of intake

Experiment 1: Wheat bran Arbocel

Dry matter 84.2 86.5Experiment 2: Wheat bran Arbocel

Dry matter 65.3 69.5Crude protein 69.6 77.9Crude fat 93.9 97.0Carbohydrates 67.4 74.3Experiment 3: Beet pulp Arbocel

Organic matter 86.7 90.4Crude protein 82.5 85.7Crude fat 97.6 97.7

Table 1 - Influence of dietary Arbocel RC on group-mean apparent digestibility of dry matter and macronutrients in dogs. Within experiments, the dry foods contained similar amounts of crude fibre.

13AAF008z021 21 07-10-13 14:40