FHSChapter 11 Misleading Graphs and Statistics PS.1.AC.5: Interpret and evaluate, with and without...

15
FHS Chapter 1 1 Misleading Graphs and Statistics PS.1.AC.5: Interpret and evaluate, with and without appropriate technology, graphical and tabular data displays for consistency with the data, appropriateness of type of graph or data display, scale, and overall message. Students will be able to determine why certain graphs are misleading.

Transcript of FHSChapter 11 Misleading Graphs and Statistics PS.1.AC.5: Interpret and evaluate, with and without...

Page 1: FHSChapter 11 Misleading Graphs and Statistics PS.1.AC.5: Interpret and evaluate, with and without appropriate technology, graphical and tabular data displays.

FHS Chapter 1 1

Misleading Graphs and Statistics

PS.1.AC.5: Interpret and evaluate, with and without appropriate technology, graphical and tabular data displays for consistency with the data, appropriateness of type of graph or data display, scale, and overall message.

Students will be able to determine why certain graphs are misleading.

Page 2: FHSChapter 11 Misleading Graphs and Statistics PS.1.AC.5: Interpret and evaluate, with and without appropriate technology, graphical and tabular data displays.

Questions to Ask When Looking at Data and/or Graphs Is the information presented correctly? Is the graph trying to influence you? Does the scale use a regular interval? What impression is the graph giving

you?

Page 3: FHSChapter 11 Misleading Graphs and Statistics PS.1.AC.5: Interpret and evaluate, with and without appropriate technology, graphical and tabular data displays.

Why is this graph misleading?This title tells the reader what to think (that there are huge increases in price).

The actual increase in price is 2,000 pounds, which is less than a 3% increase.

The graph shows the second bar as being 3 times the size of the first bar, which implies a 300% increase in price.

The scale moves from 0 to 80,000 in the same amount of space as 80,000 to 81,000.

Page 4: FHSChapter 11 Misleading Graphs and Statistics PS.1.AC.5: Interpret and evaluate, with and without appropriate technology, graphical and tabular data displays.

A more accurate graph:

An unbiased title

A scale with a regular interval.

This shows a more accurate picture of the increase.

Page 5: FHSChapter 11 Misleading Graphs and Statistics PS.1.AC.5: Interpret and evaluate, with and without appropriate technology, graphical and tabular data displays.

Why is this graph misleading?

The scale does not have a regular interval.

Page 6: FHSChapter 11 Misleading Graphs and Statistics PS.1.AC.5: Interpret and evaluate, with and without appropriate technology, graphical and tabular data displays.

Graphs can be misleading in the news. The margin of error is the amount

(usually in percentage points) that the results can be “off by.”

Be wary of data with large margins of error.

Page 7: FHSChapter 11 Misleading Graphs and Statistics PS.1.AC.5: Interpret and evaluate, with and without appropriate technology, graphical and tabular data displays.

From CNN.com

Page 8: FHSChapter 11 Misleading Graphs and Statistics PS.1.AC.5: Interpret and evaluate, with and without appropriate technology, graphical and tabular data displays.

Problems: The difference in percentage points between

Democrats and Republicans (and between Democrats and Independents) is 8% (62 – 54). Since the margin of error is 7%, it is likely that there is even less of a difference.

The graph implies that the Democrats were 8 times more likely to agree with the decision. In truth, they were only slightly more likely to agree with the decision.

The graph does not accurately demonstrate that a majority of all groups interviewed agreed with the decision.

Page 9: FHSChapter 11 Misleading Graphs and Statistics PS.1.AC.5: Interpret and evaluate, with and without appropriate technology, graphical and tabular data displays.

CNN.com updates the graph:

Page 10: FHSChapter 11 Misleading Graphs and Statistics PS.1.AC.5: Interpret and evaluate, with and without appropriate technology, graphical and tabular data displays.

What does the top of this graph show?

•About 12 million people are downloading music legally.

•Just over 9 million people are downloading music illegally.

The bottom of the graph is misleading. Why?

•The graph implies that 1% of the iPods are filled with legally downloaded music.

•It implies that the other 99% are filled with illegally downloaded music.

Why is this wrong?

Page 11: FHSChapter 11 Misleading Graphs and Statistics PS.1.AC.5: Interpret and evaluate, with and without appropriate technology, graphical and tabular data displays.

What could be in those iPods besides legally downloaded music? Empty space – most people don’t have

iPods that are filled to capacity. Songs that were added from legally

purchased CDs. Games, calendars, other applications. Songs that were downloaded illegally.

It is possible that the rest of the iPod contains some illegally downloaded music, but it is unlikely that 99% of a person’s iPod is filled with illegal music.

Page 12: FHSChapter 11 Misleading Graphs and Statistics PS.1.AC.5: Interpret and evaluate, with and without appropriate technology, graphical and tabular data displays.

More information: The iPod graphic appeared in Wired magazine. A quote from the article: “What’s filling all that

excess capacity? Well, despite the efforts of the Recording Industry Association of America, nearly a billion songs are traded on P2P networks every month.”

This article was trying to imply that all of the excess space is filled with illegal downloads, which is likely untrue.

The statistics for the article were provided by the music industry.

Page 13: FHSChapter 11 Misleading Graphs and Statistics PS.1.AC.5: Interpret and evaluate, with and without appropriate technology, graphical and tabular data displays.

FHS Chapter 1 13

Why is the graph misleading?

5

4

3

2

1

0

Jan Feb Mar

Number of Hours

Sale

s (i

n 1

0,0

00

)

Sales of Mango Mango• What can you say about sales of the drink Mango Mango?

• What is decep-tive about the graph?

• How could we change it?

Page 14: FHSChapter 11 Misleading Graphs and Statistics PS.1.AC.5: Interpret and evaluate, with and without appropriate technology, graphical and tabular data displays.

FHS Chapter 1 14

Why is the graph misleading?

This year

0 100 120 140 160 180 200

Hits

Phil’s Hits

• If Phil’s agent says “We need to give Phil a raise, his hits have doubled since last year!”, what would be wrong with that statement?

Last year

• How could we change this graph so that it is not mis-leading? 0 40 80 120 160

200 240Hits

Page 15: FHSChapter 11 Misleading Graphs and Statistics PS.1.AC.5: Interpret and evaluate, with and without appropriate technology, graphical and tabular data displays.

FHS Chapter 1 15

Why do these graphs look different?

Week 1 2 3 4 5

Sales 252 246 265 275 280

330

310

290

270

250

0

Sales

500

400

300

200

100

0

Sales

1 2 3 4 5

Week

1 2 3 4 5

Week