Female genital mutilation
-
Upload
mayra-linares -
Category
News & Politics
-
view
1.215 -
download
4
Transcript of Female genital mutilation
Female Genital
Mutilation
FGMFemale Genital Mutilation compromises
all procedures involving partial or total removal of the external female genitalia or other injury to the female genital organs for non medical reasons (WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, 1997). It is also a cultural and religious belief that violates women’s lives and rights. Most importantly it highlights gender inequality and it is an extreme form of discrimination against women. It violates the rights of children, security, physical integrity, and health. Above all, the right to be free of torture or degrading treatment and the right to life, especially when the procedure ends in death.
Procedures
*Type III- Also known as Infibulation.
*Type IV- All other harmful procedures to the female genitalia for non-medical purposes, for example: pricking, piercing, incising, scraping and cauterization.
Health Risks
health benefits.
damages healthy genital tissue and
interferes with a woman’s natural bodily functions.
Health Risks
Immediate
Complications Severe pain
Shock
Hemorrhage
Tetanus
Sepsis (bacterial infection)
Urine retention
Open sores
Long Term
Consequences Bladder and urinary tract infections
Cysts
Infertility
Need for later surgeries
Childbirth complications
Newborn deaths
Decreased sexual pleasure
We believe that there are certain physical and psychological
limitations that culture cannot transcend.
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (2001)
says:
The right to participate in cultural life and freedom of religion is
protected by international law. However, international law
stipulates that freedom to manifest one’s religion or beliefs might
be subject to limitations necessary to protect the fundamental
rights and freedoms of others. Therefore, social and cultural
claims cannot be evoked to justify female genital mutilation.
Ethiopia
Amhara, Tigrayans, Jeberti,
among 80 others
2/3 Christian
1/3 Muslim
= 51 years old
= 17
years old
Ethiopia
Most common: Type I and II and
Infibulationcommonly practiced.
Age range: a woman’s life…until marriage
Type I: Amharas, Tigrayans, and Jeberti
Type II: Gurages, some Tigrayans
Type III: Afar, Harari, and Somali
Type IV: Gojam
Ethiopia
Lack of land rights
Discriminatory legislation
Gender gap in work
Access to education and health
Constant threat of harmful traditional practices (HTP)
Female genitals unclean
Ethiopia
As a woman you will…
Get resepect
Become a woman
Be worthy of marriage and a man
If you disagree…promiscuous and
unworthy
Religion as justification
Ethiopia
National Constitution Article 4
Women havethe right to protection by the State from
harmful customs, laws, and practices that oppress them
and cause bodily or mental harm to them are prohibited.
Penal Code
Imprisonment and 500 Birr ($55 USD) fine.
No enforcement whatsoever
Ethiopia
NCTPE
Helps overcome HTPs, yet it promotes those with a positive effect in society. Especially leaders of the community. Tackles FGM as a health issue not a human rights issue
Member of the International African Committee
NGO that works directly with the community and other NGOs in the community.
Provides: education, information, campaigns, didactic material, symposiums, workshops, etc…
Statistics
50% of women in Ethiopia have their clitoral hood
removed
6% of women undergo infibulation in the five ethnic
groups that practice it in Ethiopia.
International Organizations
Eliminating Female Genital Mutilation
An interagency statement
• The practice continues due to
cultural beliefs:• Mutilation increases her “level of marriageability”
• If is not practiced they won’t be accepted by the
society.
• “A proper marriage means not only cultural stability, but
also economical and social”.
Eliminating Female Genital Mutilation
An interagency statement
• Almost the entire community must agree with the abandonment of , in order to eliminate it.
• Steps towards effective elimination:
• Extensive training of negative effects at an early age
• Open, constructive, and informative talks where the community can learn about the need to eliminate
.
• Partnership with the government, NGO’s , international and domestic institutions.
• The media
A Social Dilemma
Agrees with point of view of
international organizations
One standard throughout
Liberals vs. Cultural relativists
How can liberal states oppose
FGM abroad yet tolerate it at
home, to whatever extent.
Conclusion
If 51% of Ethiopian population is against this practice, the global community should treat it as a cry for help.
We cannot endorse a community that degrades the physical, economic, political, psychological, and moral integrity of a woman
Yet, it cannot be completely eliminated
Synergy among political powers, economic powers, international organizations, NGO’s but above all with the Ethiopian community.
And if, with previous knowledge of all the complications and risks, if a woman (18 yrs +) still wants to go ahead with the procedure she should have adequate conditions
If this affected males….it would not even be an
issue.
The final decision
to end FGM can
be only taken by
women and girls.
Bibliography
Te la vamos a mandarpor mail en unosmomentos…
gracias por la espera
YO TMB LAS AMOOOO