FEF Position on RE

download FEF Position on RE

of 21

Transcript of FEF Position on RE

  • 8/4/2019 FEF Position on RE

    1/21

    OurPosition

    on

    RA 9513RA 9513

    Foundation for Economic Freedom, Inc.

  • 8/4/2019 FEF Position on RE

    2/21

    What is renewable energy?What is renewable energy?

    Energy from resources that do not have an upper limit on thetotal quantity to be used.

    Such resources are renewable on a regular basis, and whose

    renewal rate is relatively rapid to consider availability over anindefinite period of time.

    These include, among others, biomass, solar,wind, geothermal, ocean energy, and hydropowerconforming with internationally accepted norms andstandards on dams, and other emerging renewableenergy technologies. (RA 9513)

  • 8/4/2019 FEF Position on RE

    3/21

    Fast Facts: the Philippine SituationFast Facts: the Philippine Situation

    34%34% of the countrys energy mix is renewablerenewable oraround 5,300 MW out of the 15,000 MW installedcapacity

    Contrast to the Global average: less than 10%

    Philippines contributes only 0.48%0.48% to globalcarbon pollution (NREB)

  • 8/4/2019 FEF Position on RE

    4/21

    Fast Facts: the Philippine SituationFast Facts: the Philippine Situation

    Transportation is the countrys top polluter

    Power plants belong to thebottom ten polluters

  • 8/4/2019 FEF Position on RE

    5/21

    Renewable Energy Act of 2008Renewable Energy Act of 2008

    Signed into law in December 2008, supposedly toprovide incentivesprovide incentives for investorsfor investors to engage in REprojects in the country

    Department of EnergyDepartment of Energy (DOE)

    - lead agency

    Energy Regulatory CommissionEnergy Regulatory Commission (ERC) anindependent quasi-judicial regulatory agency

    supposed to issue FIT (feedFIT (feed--inin--tariff) rulestariff) rules inconsultation with the National Renewable EnergyBoard (NREB) created under Sec.27

  • 8/4/2019 FEF Position on RE

    6/21

    What is FIT?What is FIT?

    An RE policy that guarantees payments on afixed rate per kwh for emerging RE sources:solar, biomass, wind, solar, run-of-river hydro

    A fancy term for the amount that thegovernment wants to add to our electricitybills to encourage more use of new RE

    For all intents and purposes,

    FITIS A TAXFITIS A TAX

  • 8/4/2019 FEF Position on RE

    7/21

    What is FIT?What is FIT?

    A subsidy to make up for what the REtechnologies cost:

    Solar PHP 17.95 kw/hr

    Wind-PHP 10.37 kw/hrBiomass PHP 7.0 kw/hr

    RoR-PHP 6.15/kwhr

    vs conventional

    (PHP 5.0 kw/hr)

  • 8/4/2019 FEF Position on RE

    8/21

    We do not oppose REWe do not oppose RE. We oppose the plan to makeFilipino consumers and industries pay PHP 8Bannually for the next 20 years to subsidize and

    guarantee the profits of RE developers.

    Our PositionOur Position

    It is more prudent towaitwait, given advances intechnology, until theuntil the

    cost of solar and windcost of solar and windpower drops to paritypower drops to paritywith conventionalsources which aremore efficient.

  • 8/4/2019 FEF Position on RE

    9/21

    Our PositionOur Position

    We can increase our share of RE by

    rehabilitating and improving existingrehabilitating and improving existing

    hydro and geothermal sourceshydro and geothermal sources,

    which produce energy far cheaper

    than wind or solar.

    We support solar for OFFsolar for OFF--Grid smallGrid small

    island areasisland areas where the avoided costis much higher (PHP 11/kwhr) due to

    the use of diesel

  • 8/4/2019 FEF Position on RE

    10/21

    Our Disagreements with NREBOur Disagreements with NREB

    DOE recommended 20 MW for solar but NREBincreased it to 100 MW. This means anadditional surchargeadditional surcharge on consumers.

    Why should FIT be imposed for 20 years20 years whenthe minimum proposed by law is only 12years?

    No competitive biddingNo competitive bidding whether from amongthe different RE technologies or within aspecific technology.

  • 8/4/2019 FEF Position on RE

    11/21

    Our Disagreements with NREBOur Disagreements with NREB

    No biddingNo bidding for terms of less than 20 years. Nobidding, period. All contracts are negotiated.

    FIT Rate determined by a risk-adjusted rate

    of return. = guaranteed superguaranteed super--profitsprofits Subsidy will not go to cheapest first but all

    RE developers are guaranteed subsidy, evenhigh costing wind and solar.

    RE Developers are guaranteed cash flow,RE Developers are guaranteed cash flow,profits, collection and against technologicalprofits, collection and against technologicalobsolescence for 20 years.obsolescence for 20 years.

  • 8/4/2019 FEF Position on RE

    12/21

    Our Disagreements with NREBOur Disagreements with NREB

    NREB hiding onerous charge againstconsumers by submitting FIT Rate under therule-making power of ERC.

    Ergo, no public hearing, no publicationno publication, justpublic consultation EVEN IF THE FIT RATEWILLINCREASE CHARGES FOR ALLINCREASE CHARGES FOR ALLCONSUMERSCONSUMERS. This is a clear violation of theletter and spirit of EPIRA and the mandate ofERC.

  • 8/4/2019 FEF Position on RE

    13/21

    They say; we sayThey say; we say

    They say

    We have to diversify.

    We say

    Solar and wind are unreliableSolar and wind are unreliable and cant bebasis for energy diversification.

    We need around 5,000 MW in the next few

    years to supply growing energy demandOld RE is stillavailable that is yet to beOld RE is stillavailable that is yet to beuntappeduntapped -15,000 MW (hydro and geothermal)

  • 8/4/2019 FEF Position on RE

    14/21

    They say

    It is good for the environment.

    We say

    The Philippines has no obligationno obligation to reduce its carbonemissions. Our contribution to global pollution is almostnegligiblenegligible.

    Transportation is the top pollutant; power plants rank in thebottom ten.

    We are already producing more than 30% of our power fromRenewables, more than the US at 10 %.

  • 8/4/2019 FEF Position on RE

    15/21

    They say

    Energy independence and security

    We say

    Better results; cheapercheaperalternativealternative.

    Solar and wind are ratherinefficient and unsteady sincethey are dependent on weatherand other climatic conditions.Conventional sources are moreConventional sources are morereliablereliable and cost only PHP 5 perkilowatt hour

    We stillhave 15,000 MW of15,000 MW ofuntapped hydro and geothermaluntapped hydro and geothermal

  • 8/4/2019 FEF Position on RE

    16/21

    They say

    Solar energy is good.

    We say

    We dont oppose solar energy per se, but

    they should go to off-grid small island areas

    where the avoided cost (about PHP11/kwhr) is high due to the use of diesel.

  • 8/4/2019 FEF Position on RE

    17/21

    They say

    What is PHP 12 centavos per kilowatt hour?We say

    It only covers the generation charge.

    There are hidden costshidden costs.

    NGCP willalso need to

    install new

    tra

    nsmissionlines

    andit may require further

    rate hikes for

    distribution utilities.

  • 8/4/2019 FEF Position on RE

    18/21

    Why does it concern you?

    Businesses, whichalready suffer from the

    highest power cost in Asia, willhave to suffer

    more unnecessarily. This will make them less

    competitive.

    Investors will not come to the country if power

    cost willbecome higher still.

    No investments, no job

    s.No investments, no job

    s.Consumers are being taxed without them

    knowing it just to subsidize the profits of these

    wealthy RE developers.

  • 8/4/2019 FEF Position on RE

    19/21

    What can you do?What can you do?

    File a comment using the official comment format the ERC

    File a petition for intervention/relief

    Make noise in social media.

    Like our page: NO to Electricity HIKE forNO to Electricity HIKE for

    FilipinosFilipinos

    PROTEST, PROTEST, PROTEST!PROTEST, PROTEST, PROTEST!

  • 8/4/2019 FEF Position on RE

    20/21

    Annex A

    P1.6 billion - Daang Hari-South Luzon

    Expressway link

    P10.59 billion - NAIA expresswayP21 billion - North Luzon-South Luzon

    expressway link

    P10.5-billion - Cavite-Lagunaexpressway

  • 8/4/2019 FEF Position on RE

    21/21

    Annex B