Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Item No. C- 3 KeySpan LNG & Algonquin Gas Transmission Pipeline...
-
Upload
melina-phillips -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
2
Transcript of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Item No. C- 3 KeySpan LNG & Algonquin Gas Transmission Pipeline...
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Item No. C- 3Item No. C- 3
KeySpan LNG & KeySpan LNG & Algonquin Gas Algonquin Gas
Transmission PipelineTransmission Pipeline
June 30, 2005
Material on this page is consider Non-Internet Public (NIP)
You would like a copy of this slide, please contact:
Public Reference RoomTelephone: 202-502-8371Toll-free 1-866-208-3676Email: [email protected]
Item No. C- 3 List of Public Meetings.
June 3, 2004: Scoping Meeting (Providence)June 3, 2004: Scoping Meeting (Providence) June 4, 2004: Publically-attended Site June 4, 2004: Publically-attended Site
Inspection (KeySpan Facility)Inspection (KeySpan Facility) July 7, 2004: Scoping Meeting (Providence; July 7, 2004: Scoping Meeting (Providence;
Fields Point Area)Fields Point Area) July 8, 2004: Scoping Meeting (Middletown)July 8, 2004: Scoping Meeting (Middletown) January 11, 2005: DEIS Comment Meeting January 11, 2005: DEIS Comment Meeting
(Providence; Fields Point Area)(Providence; Fields Point Area) January 12, 2005: DEIS Comment Meeting January 12, 2005: DEIS Comment Meeting
(Middletown)(Middletown)
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Item No. C- 3 KeySpan LNG, L.P.
•50 LNG tankers per year•375,000 Mcf per day into Algonquin’s
proposed facilities•up to 150,000 Mcf per day of vaporized LNG to New England Gas•20,000 Mcf per day from its truck loading
Item No. C- 3 KeySpan LNG, L.P.
Current Federal Safety Standards Not Met
LNG storage tank impoundment designed to 100 percent of the tank contents rather than 110 percent;
thermal radiation & flammable vapor exclusion zones extend offsite onto adjacent properties;
evaluation by a seismic consultant required to determine existing tank compliance with the 2001 edition of the NFPA, which increased the stringency and complexity of the seismic requirements.