Feasibility study of TULIP: a TUrning LInac for ... 4 Novel... · Feasibility study of TULIP: a...
Transcript of Feasibility study of TULIP: a TUrning LInac for ... 4 Novel... · Feasibility study of TULIP: a...
Feasibility study of TULIP: a TUrningLInac for ProtontherapLInac for Protontherapy
ICTRICTR--PHE 2012 ConferencePHE 2012 Conference
28.02.2012A. Degiovanni
U. Amaldi, M. Garlasché, K. Kraus, P. Magagnin, U. Oelfke, P. Posocco, P. Riboni, V. Rizzoglio
TULIP: a Single Room Facility projectTULIP: a Single Room Facility project
Why single room facilities ?– Proton therapy beneficial to at least 12% of X-ray patients
(ENLIGHT studies outcome)(ENLIGHT studies outcome)– ~ 2.400 patients/year every 10'000'000 people– 1 proton room every 1.5 Milion inhabitantsp y
Advantages– Spread the investement cost– Hospital based protontherapy (not dedicated centres)
Technical challengesSize and cost of the machine– Size and cost of the machine
– Dose delivery modalities– Treatment time
28.02.2012 ICTR-PHE 2012 - A. Degiovanni 2
A A cyclinaccyclinac basedbased solutionsolution
TULIP = TU i LI f C-band linac
C-band linacSection 1TUrning LInac for
Protontherapy
C band linacSection 2
Section 1
cyclotron
Line with 2% momentum acceptancey acceptance
B d
RF rotating joints
Beam dose delivery
RF Power sources
Mechanical structure
28.02.2012 ICTR-PHE 2012 - A. Degiovanni 3
The CYCLINAC timelineThe CYCLINAC timeline
1993: first Cyclinac proposalproposal
2007: first * See abs. #227 by S. Verdú Andrés
2003: test on LIBO-62 MeV (TERA-CERN-INFN)
CABOTO design
2010:2010: CABOTO-C design (*)
11.2010: LIGHT 1st UNIT inaugurated by
CERN DG Prof. R. Heuer(courtesy of ADAM SA ) [U Amaldi S Braccini and P Puggioni
28.02.2012 ICTR-PHE 2012 - A. Degiovanni 4
ADAM SA.) [U. Amaldi, S. Braccini and P. Puggioni, RAST Vol 2 (2009) 111-131]
The The linaclinac and RF systemand RF systemElectric field di t ib ti (HFSS)
acc. cell on axis
coupl. cellon side
distribution (HFSS)
acc. tanksexcited cavity
TANKspace for quadrupoles
un-excitedcavity
RF cavities in π/2 mode Accelerating TANKS Acc. units with space for PMQs H11 polarizer (Igor Syratchev, CERN) linear
l i ticircular l i ti
28.02.2012 ICTR-PHE 2012 - A. Degiovanni 5
polarization polarization
The CYCLINAC timelineThe CYCLINAC timeline
1993: first Cyclinac proposalproposal
2007: first * See abs. #227 by S. Verdú Andrés
2003: test on LIBO-62 MeV (TERA-CERN-INFN)
CABOTO design
2010:2010: CABOTO-C design (*)
11.2010: LIGHT 1st UNIT inaugurated by
E0 = 15 MV/m
CERN DG Prof. R. Heuer(courtesy of ADAM SA ) [U Amaldi S Braccini and P Puggioni
E0 = 16 MV/m
28.02.2012 ICTR-PHE 2012 - A. Degiovanni 6
ADAM SA.) [U. Amaldi, S. Braccini and P. Puggioni, RAST Vol 2 (2009) 111-131]
The choice of the frequencyThe choice of the frequency
TULIP project requires shorter linacsp j q Higher gradients are needed (~35 MV/m)
Reliability in terms of BDR High gradient tests (S- and C- band) in collaboration with CLICcollaboration with CLICsee poster #203 (Cyclinac group)
Size of RF rotating joints for power transmissionp
Power source availability
CC-- band : 5.712 GHzband : 5.712 GHz
28.02.2012 ICTR-PHE 2012 - A. Degiovanni 7
TULIP preliminary designTULIP preliminary design
@5.7 GHz (C-band) from 35 to 210 MeV
Quantity [unit] Section 1 Section 2
Output energy [MeV] 80 210
Total length [m] 3.9 5.9g [ ]
Avg. E0 [MV/m] 20-24 32-38
Max. ESURFACE [MV/m] 150 170
Number of units 1 (4) 7
Peak Power [MW] 25 84
Repetition rate [Hz] 200 200Repetition rate [Hz] 200 200
Pulse length [μs] 2.5 2.5
28.02.2012 ICTR-PHE 2012 - A. Degiovanni 8
Fast active energy variationFast active energy variation
E)(E
) / N
(EdN
(
Energy [MeV]
28.02.2012 ICTR-PHE 2012 - A. Degiovanni 9
FastFast active active energyenergy variationvariation
Active energy variation in the range 80-210 MeV Energy spread within 2 mm distal fall-off
Active spot scanning with Active spot scanning with tumourtumour multipaintingmultipainting
28.02.2012 ICTR-PHE 2012 - A. Degiovanni 10
TULIP TULIP beambeam transfertransfer lineline
pER
5381With Δp/p = ±2% ΔR/R = ± 7%
pER 5.38.1
For R = 30 cm ΔR = ± 2.1 cm
30 5
28.2 32.9 29.4 cm
31.7 cm
30.5 cm
cm cm
28.02.2012 ICTR-PHE 2012 - A. Degiovanni 11
Supporting structureSupporting structureC-band
linaclinac
Section I [kg]
Section II [kg]
Linac 340 460Linac 340 460Beam
Structure 3400 4800
Ancillaries 640 860
28.02.2012 ICTR-PHE 2012 - A. Degiovanni 12
TULIP Mechanical DesignTULIP Mechanical DesignBearings
Rot axisRot. axis
Actuators
1 2 31 3
Total estimated 60weight [tons] 60
Max angacceleration 0.5acceleration
[rad/s2]0.5
Max rotation speed* [rpm] 1.5
28.02.2012 ICTR-PHE 2012 - A. Degiovanni 13
speed [rpm]* derived from norm EN 60601 and max vel considerations
NovelNovel studystudy of of dynamicdynamic dose dose deliverydelivery
• simulation of dynamic delivery via computer software• based on treatment plan data for a static dose delivery• dynamic parameters (repetition rate, vGantry , vCouch)
Plan data:Dij matricesij
Spot positionsSpot weights
Dynamic dose l l ti
Dose di t ib ti
TPS:Calculation of
Tulip machineparameters:Gantry speed
calculation distributionstatic plan
yRepetition rateCouch speed
Number of protons
more information: Poster 156 by Kim Kraus (DKFZ Heidelberg) more information: Poster 156 by Kim Kraus (DKFZ, Heidelberg)
28.02.2012 ICTR-PHE 2012 - A. Degiovanni 14
NovelNovel studystudy of of dynamicdynamic dose dose deliverydelivery• dynamic dose delivery to a cylindrical target volumecylindrical target volume
• different combinations of dynamic parameters
the higher the gantry speed thethe higher the gantry speed the higher must be the repetition rate
to deliver all spots
DDiff = Ddyn(f= 100Hz, vGantry = 1°/s) - Dstatic
Difference dose distribution :Good agreement of the dynamic
and static dose distributions within the target!
28.02.2012
within the target!
ICTR-PHE 2012 - A. Degiovanni 15
SummarySummary
First design in C-band for a single room facility:
Linac and RF design M h i l d i
Cyclinac Mechanical design Novel dose delivery
concept
Future developments:Optimization of Section 1 TULIP New dose
deliveryCompact beam line- Optimization of Section 1
- Final mechanical spec.
de e ybeam line
Combine acceleration Combine acceleration d t fl ibilit ithd t fl ibilit ith
New mechanical
designand gantry flexibility with and gantry flexibility with active energy variationactive energy variation
g
28.02.2012 ICTR-PHE 2012 - A. Degiovanni 16