Fault Study - 100255K

download Fault Study - 100255K

of 25

Transcript of Fault Study - 100255K

  • 7/30/2019 Fault Study - 100255K

    1/25

    EE 2192 Laboratory Practice IV

    FAULT STUDY

    Name

    Index No.

    Field

    Group

    Date of Performance

    Date of Submission

    : W.M.C.N.S.Kirinde

    : 100255K

    : Electrical Engineering

    : G6

    : 2012/11/22

    : 2012/12/06

    Instructed by : H.G.D.M.Somarathne

  • 7/30/2019 Fault Study - 100255K

    2/25

    Fault Point: ANURADHAPURA BUS-BAR

    Single Line to Ground Fault (L-G)

    Positive Sequence

    (Va1, Ia1)Negative Sequence

    (Va2, Ia2)Zero Sequence

    (Va0, Ia0)

    Fault Voltage (V) 40.19 -17.98 -22.17

    Fault Current (mA) 13.5 13.5 13.5

    Line to Line Fault (L-L)

    Positive Sequence

    (Va1, Ia1)Negative Sequence

    (Va2, Ia2)Zero Sequence

    (Va0, Ia0)

    Fault Voltage (V) 32.07 32.06 0

    Fault Current (mA) 24.5 -24.5 0

    Double Line to Ground Fault (L-L-G)

    Positive Sequence

    (Va1, Ia1)Negative Sequence

    (Va2, Ia2)Zero Sequence

    (Va0, Ia0)

    Fault Voltage (V) 24.81 24.81 24.81

    Fault Current (mA) 34 -19 -15.5

    OBSERVATION SHEET:

    PRACTICAL

    NAME

    INDEX NO.

    FIELD

    GROUP

    DATE OF PERFORMANCE

    DATE OF SUBMISSION

    INSTRUCTED BY

    : Fault Study

    : W.M.C.N.S.Kirinde

    : 100255K: Electrical Engineering

    : G6

    : 2012/11/22

    : 2012/12/06

    : H.G.D.M.Somarathne

  • 7/30/2019 Fault Study - 100255K

    3/25

    PROCEDURE:

    X1 = 0.06

    X2 = 0.04

    X0 = 0.01

    XP = 0.048

    XT = 0.055

    XS = 0.051

    POLPITIYAANURADHAPURA

    LAXAPANA KOLONNAWA BOLAWATTA

    Z = 0.002 + j0.005

    X0 = 0.02

    Z = 0.017 + j0.04

    X0 = 0.15

    Z = 0.19 + j0.44

    X0 = 2.0

    Z = 0.156 + j0.341

    X0 = 1.1

    Z = 0.347 + j0.8

    X0 = 2.5

    Z = 0.057 + j0.13

    X0 = 0.45

    Z = 0.058 + j0.102

    X0 = 0.04

    X1 = 0.3

    X2= 0.2

    X0 = 0.05

    X0 = 0.1X0 = 0.09

    X0 = 0.08

    X0 = 0.02

    All data is in pu according to following bases,

    132kV, 40MVA

  • 7/30/2019 Fault Study - 100255K

    4/25

    Positive sequence equivalent circuit

    1 pu

    Reference

    0.005

    0.102

    0.08

    0.04

    0.44

    0.341

    0.13

    0.8

    0.4

    ANURADHAPURA

    POLPITIYA

    LAXAPANA KOLONNAWA BOLAWATTA

    0.048

    0.051

    0.055

    0.08

    0.09

    F

  • 7/30/2019 Fault Study - 100255K

    5/25

    Negative sequence equivalent circuit

    0.09

    0.048

    0.0510.055

    0.08

    0.005

    0.102

    0.06

    0.04

    0.44

    0.341

    0.13

    0.8

    0.3

    ANURADHAPURA

    POLPITIYA

    LAXAPANA KOLONNAWABOLAWATT

    Reference

    F

  • 7/30/2019 Fault Study - 100255K

    6/25

    Zero sequence equivalent circuit

    0.09

    0.048

    0.051

    0.055

    0.08

    0.005

    0.102

    0.06

    0.04

    0.44

    0.341

    0.13

    0.8

    0.3

    ANURADHAPURA

    POLPITIYA

    LAXAPANA KOLONNAWA BOLAWATTA

    Reference

    F

  • 7/30/2019 Fault Study - 100255K

    7/25

    THEORY:

    1. Importance of a fault study.Power systems are always dynamic systems due to the changes occur during switching

    operations. A fault analysis is essential to determine the short circuit rating of newswitchgear and other substation infrastructure equipment that will be procured and installed.

    For design, operation and protection purposes, fault studies should be done routinely. Fault

    analysis plays a huge role in the safety factor. Power system equipment such as circuit

    breakers can fail catastrophically if they are subjected to fault duties that exceed their

    ratings. Other equipment like busbars, transformers and cables likely to fail thermally or

    mechanically if subjected to fault currents in excess of ratings. Hence, to ensure the safety of

    workers and the general public fault study is a major factor.

    2. What are the analogue methods of studying the fault flow in a system? Symmetrical components method

    All three main sequences positive, negative and zero sequences are used in this

    symmetrical components method. An asymmetric fault is represented by those symmetric

    components. Hence, the analysis is very easy to perform.

    Bus impedance methodIn this method of fault study, bus-bar impedances are used. Both the symmetrical and

    asymmetrical faults can be analyzed using this method. Bus impedance method has a higher

    accuracy level though this method is hard in analyzing.

    3. How DC network analyzer may be used for this purpose. (Explain for bothsymmetrical and asymmetrical faults).

    DC network analyzer is used to simulate a network in its three sequence components. In

    a symmetrical fault it is just the positive sequence required and in asymmetrical faults all

    three sequences are used to represent the fault. Thus, this enables analyzing the sequence

    components of a network. The sequential networks can be connected independently and the

    values of sequential components can read using the metering equipment. The generators of

    the given power system are represented by a DC power supply.

  • 7/30/2019 Fault Study - 100255K

    8/25

    Then current & voltage sequence components can be measured using metering

    equipment. Measurements are taken in per unit values. The values of the phase voltage and

    phase current can then be calculated by applying to the matrix equation. To obtain actual

    values, calculated values have to be multiplied by the corresponding scale factors and base

    factors.

    4. Importance of using sequence components.The model we used to analyze a power system in this practical uses the three main

    symmetrical components the positive, the negative and the zero sequences. And the

    asymmetric fault is represented by those symmetric components after being done some

    calculations. This method is easy in analyzing and calculations. Because the circuit converts

    to the symmetrical components, the equipment in the circuit such as generators, transformers

    and transmission lines replace by impedances and voltage sources. Apart from that the

    sequence matrix calculation is much easier than that of complex asymmetric calculations.

    Another advantage is that using the per unit values the high values of currents, voltages

    under fault conditions can be replaced by the measurable quantities.

  • 7/30/2019 Fault Study - 100255K

    9/25

    5. The relationships between the sequence impedances for generators, transformers andtransmission lines with suitable reasons.

    Generator

    The impedance for the currents of the three sequences will generally be different for

    each sequence due to the direction of the rotation of generator as its a rotating machine in

    operation. The rotational emf generated for positive and negative sequences would also tend

    to change because of the rotating direction of the generator.

    Transformer

    Transformer, in the gross is a passive and stationary device. It does not have any

    specific direction in rotation as we discussed in the generator. Thus, all the impedances of

    positive sequence, negative sequence and zero sequence are almost the same in value.

    However, the zero sequence paths across the windings of a transformer depend on the

    winding connection and even grounding impedance. The winding connection configuration

    may either be star or delta. In the delta winding the current can circulate within the winding.

    Transmission Lines

    Much similar to the transformer as they are passive, stationary and do not have specific

    direction in rotation. Thus, they have the same positive sequence and negative sequence

    impedances. Because the zero sequence impedance comes across the grounding path, those

    earth wire impedances might be considerably large and needed to be added. Hence, zero

    sequence impedance will be somewhat different from the other impedances.

  • 7/30/2019 Fault Study - 100255K

    10/25

    CALCULATIONS:

    i. Calculations using practical valuesSingle Line to Earth Fault (L-G)

    Va= 0 (fault impedance is zero),

    Ib= Ic = 0 (load currents are negligible compared to fault current)

    Voltage

    a2

    a1

    a0

    2

    2

    c

    b

    a

    V

    V

    V

    1

    1

    111

    V

    V

    V

    a2

    a1

    a0

    2

    2

    c

    b

    a

    VV

    V

    11

    111

    VV

    0V

    V04.0V

    98.1719.40-22.17V

    VVVV

    a

    0

    a

    a2a1a0a

    V446.12337.60V

    12098.1724019.40-22.17V

    VVVV

    0b

    00

    b

    a2a1

    2

    a0b

    V446.12337.60V

    24098.1712019.40-22.17V

    VVVV

    0

    c

    00

    c

    a2

    2

    a1a0c

    Actual voltage values,

    kV0609.0V

    )503/132(04.0V

    acta,

    acta,

    kV

    FSupply

    Side

    a

    b

    c

    Ia

    Ib

    Ic

    Va = 0

    Vb

    Vc

    EfZ1 Z2 Z0Ia1 Ia2 Ia0

    Va1 Va2 Va0

  • 7/30/2019 Fault Study - 100255K

    11/25

    kV6123.44-016.29V

    )503/132(446.12337.60V

    0

    actb,

    0

    actb,

    kV

    kV446.123016.29V)503/132(446.12337.60V

    0

    actc,

    0

    actc,

    kV

    Fault Current

    a2

    a1

    a0

    2

    2

    c

    b

    a

    I

    I

    I

    1

    1

    111

    I

    I

    I

    3I

    0I

    0I

    I

    1

    1

    111

    3

    1

    I

    I

    I

    21a0

    c

    b

    a

    2

    2

    a2

    a1

    a0

    a

    aa

    III

    Fault current, If= Ia

    = 3Ia0

    = 3 x 13.5 = 40.5 mA

    mA40.5I

    5.135.135.31I

    IIII

    a

    0

    a

    a2a1a0a

    Actual fault current = Ia,act x

    =

    = 566.85 A

  • 7/30/2019 Fault Study - 100255K

    12/25

    00

    b

    a2a1

    2

    a0b

    1205.132405.135.31I

    IIII

    A0I

    b

    00

    c

    a22

    a1a0c

    2405.131205.135.31I

    IIII

    A0Ic

  • 7/30/2019 Fault Study - 100255K

    13/25

    Line to Line Fault (L-L)

    Ia = 0 (load currents are negligible compared to fault current)

    Vb = Vc

    Ib = - Ic

    Voltage

    a2

    a1

    a0

    2

    2

    c

    b

    a

    V

    V

    V

    1

    1

    111

    V

    V

    V

    a2

    a1

    a0

    2

    2

    bc

    b

    a

    V

    V

    V

    1

    1

    111

    VV

    V

    V

    V13.64V

    06.3207.320V

    VVVV a2a1a0

    a

    a

    a

    V98.179065.32V12006.3224007.320V

    VVVV

    0

    b

    00

    b

    a2a1

    2

    a0b

    Actual voltage values,

    kVkV 74.97)503/132(13.64V acta,

    kV98.17987.48V

    )503/132(98.179065.32V

    actb,

    0

    actb,

    kV

    kV98.179-87.48VV actb,actc,

    Supply

    Side

    a

    b

    c

    Ia

    Ib

    Ic

    Va

    Vb

    Vc

    Va0

    Z0

    Ia0

    Va2

    Z1 Ia1

    Ef

    Va1

    Z2Ia2

  • 7/30/2019 Fault Study - 100255K

    14/25

    Fault Current

    a2

    a1

    a0

    2

    2

    c

    b

    a

    I

    I

    I

    1

    1

    111

    I

    I

    I

    a2

    a1

    a0

    2

    2

    bc

    b

    a

    I

    I

    I

    1

    1

    111

    II

    I

    0I

    A0I

    5.245.240I

    IIII

    a

    a

    a2a1a0a

    mA90435.42I

    1205.242405.240I

    IIII

    0

    b

    00

    b

    a2a1

    2

    a0b

    Ic = - Ib = mA

    Actual current values,

    A

    A

    90936.593I

    (50/4000)

    )]3*[40/(13290435.42I

    0

    actb,

    0

    actb,

    A

    A

    90936.593I

    (50/4000))]3*[40/(13290435.42I

    0

    actc,

    0actc,

  • 7/30/2019 Fault Study - 100255K

    15/25

    Double Line to Ground Fault (L-L-G)

    Supply

    Side

    a

    b

    c

    VaIa

    Ib

    Ic

    Vb=0

    Vc=0

    When fault impedance is zero,

    Vb =Vc =0

    Ia= 0

    Voltage

    a2

    a1

    a0

    2

    2

    c

    b

    a

    V

    V

    V

    1

    1

    111

    V

    V

    V

    a2

    a1

    a0

    2

    2

    c

    b

    a

    V

    V

    V

    1

    1

    111

    0V

    0V

    V

    V43.74V

    81.2481.2481.24V

    VVVV

    a

    a

    a2a1a0a

    Actual voltage values,

    kV44.113V

    )503/132(43.74V

    a

    acta,

    kV

    V0V

    12081.2424081.2481.24V

    VVVV

    b

    00

    b

    a2a1

    2

    a0b

    V0V

    24081.2412081.2481.24V

    VVVV

    c

    00

    c

    a2

    2

    a1a0c

  • 7/30/2019 Fault Study - 100255K

    16/25

    Fault Current

    a2

    a1

    a0

    2

    2

    c

    b

    a

    I

    I

    I

    1

    1

    111

    I

    I

    I

    a2

    a1

    a0

    2

    2

    c

    b

    a

    I

    I

    I

    1

    1

    111

    I

    I

    0I

    mA0

    a

    a

    a2a1a0a

    1805.0I

    19345.51I

    IIII

    mA0

    b

    00

    b

    a2a1

    2

    a0b

    62.11634.51I

    12019240345.51I

    IIII

    mA0

    c

    00

    c

    a2

    2

    a1a0c

    62.11634.51I

    24019120345.51I

    IIII

    Actual current values,

    A

    A

    180998.6I

    (50/4000)

    )]3*[40/(1321805.0I

    0

    acta,

    0

    acta,

    A

    A

    62.11657.718I

    (50/4000)

    )]3*[40/(13262.11634.51I

    0

    actb,

    0

    actb,

    A

    A

    62.11657.718I

    (50/4000)

    )]3*[40/(13262.11634.51I

    0actc,

    0

    actc,

  • 7/30/2019 Fault Study - 100255K

    17/25

    ii. Theoretical calculations using given dataConsidering that the fault has occurred at Anuradhapura bus bar.

    Single Line to Earth Fault (L-G)

    0Va , 0Ib , 0Ic

    3

    IIII

    0I

    0I

    I

    1

    1

    111

    3

    1

    I

    I

    I

    a2a1aa0

    c

    b

    a

    2

    2

    a2

    a1

    a0

    Fault Current

    Since,

    Z1 =0.239

    Z2 = 0.223

    Z0 = 0.609

    Ef= 1 pu

    AI

    I

    II

    II

    II

    II

    Z

    Z

    Z

    E

    V

    V

    V

    actf

    actf

    af

    aa

    aa

    aa

    f

    a

    a

    a

    07.490

    101323

    1040

    609.0223.0239.0

    13

    ZZZ

    E3

    3

    3

    3

    00

    00

    00

    0

    0

    ,

    3

    6

    ,

    021

    f

    2

    1

    0

    2

    1

    0

    2

    1

    0

  • 7/30/2019 Fault Study - 100255K

    18/25

    Voltage

    AII aa 36.1633

    490.07I 21a0

    6.43540MVA

    (132kV)Z

    2

    base

    kV868.1536.1636.4350.223IZV

    kV59.20336.1636.4350.2393

    10132IZEV

    kV336.4336.1636.4350.609IZV

    a22a2

    3

    a11fa1

    a00a0

    0VVVVV a2a1a0a

    kV134.99-93.91V

    120868.15240203.59336.43V

    VVVV

    0

    b

    00

    b

    a2a1

    2

    a0b

    kV134.9993.91V

    042868.15021203.59336.43V

    VVVV

    0

    c

    00

    c

    a2

    2

    a1a0c

  • 7/30/2019 Fault Study - 100255K

    19/25

    Line to Line Fault (L-L)

    Ia = 0, Vb = Vc ,Ib = -Ic

    Fault Current

    Since,

    Z1 =0.239

    Z2 = 0.223

    Z0 = 0.608

    Ef= 1 pu

    AI

    AII

    AI

    ZZ

    EI

    a

    aa

    a

    f

    a

    0

    69.378

    69.378

    101323

    1040

    )223.0(0.239

    1

    0

    12

    1

    3

    6

    21

    1

    A90-91.655I

    12069.37824069.3780I

    IIII

    0

    b

    00

    b

    a2a1

    2

    a0b

    A

    A9091.655I

    A90-91.655I

    II

    0

    c

    0

    c

    bc

  • 7/30/2019 Fault Study - 100255K

    20/25

    Voltage

    VZIV

    kVVV

    ZIVV

    aa

    aa

    aaa

    0

    79.36

    6.435223.069.378

    000

    21

    2221

    kV80179.36VV

    kV80179.36V

    12079.3624079.360V

    VVVV

    58.73V

    79.3679.360V

    VVVV

    0

    bc

    0b

    00

    b

    a2a1

    2

    a0b

    a

    a

    a2a1a0a

    kV

    kV

  • 7/30/2019 Fault Study - 100255K

    21/25

    Double Line to Ground Fault (L-L-G)

    Ia = 0

    Vb = Vc = 0

    Fault Current

    Since,

    Z1 =0.239

    Z2 = 0.223

    Z0 = 0.608

    Ef= 1 pu

    AI

    ZZ

    ZII

    AI

    ZZ

    ZII

    AIZZZ

    EI

    a

    aa

    a

    aa

    a

    f

    a

    75.116

    223.0608.0

    223.004.435

    29.318

    223.0608.0

    608.004.435

    04.435101323

    1040

    ))608.0//223.0(239.0(

    1

    )//(

    0

    20

    210

    2

    20

    012

    1

    3

    6

    021

    1

    A105.03-49.675I

    120318.29240435.04116.75I

    IIII

    0

    b

    00

    b

    a2a1

    2

    a0b

    A

    A105.0349.675I

    240318.29120435.04116.75I

    IIII

    0

    c

    00c

    a2

    2

    a1a0c

    A

    Voltage

    kVV

    IZEVV

    a

    afaa

    76.92

    04.4356.435239.03

    101323)(333

    111

  • 7/30/2019 Fault Study - 100255K

    22/25

    RESULTS:

    L-G fault Practical Theoretical

    Fault

    Currents

    Ia 566.85 A 490.07A

    Ib 0 0

    Ic 0 0

    Fault

    Voltages

    Va 0.0609 kV 0

    Vb 92.016 -123.4460

    kV 91.93 -134.990

    kV

    Vc 92.016123.4460

    kV 91.93134.990

    kV

    L-L fault Practical Theoretical

    Fault

    Currents

    Ia 0 0

    Ib 593.936 -900

    A 655.91 -900

    A

    Ic 593.936900

    A 655.91900

    A

    Fault

    Voltages

    Va 97.74 kV 73.58 kV

    Vb 48.87 -179.980 kV 36.79180

    0 kV

    Vc 48.87 -179.980

    kV 36.791800

    kV

    L-L-G fault Practical Theoretical

    Fault

    Currents

    Ia 6.9981800 A 0

    Ib 718.57 -116.620

    A 675.49 -105.030

    A

    Ic 718.57116.620

    A 675.49105.030

    A

    Fault

    Voltages

    Va 113.44 kV 92.76 kV

    Vb 0 0

    Vc 0 0

  • 7/30/2019 Fault Study - 100255K

    23/25

    DISCUSSION:

    1. What are the assumptions made in your fault study and how valid are they?

    a. Pre-fault voltages are at 1 pu (All generators are running at their rated voltages andrated frequency with their emfs in phase).Even though we assume, the sources to be balanced in magnitude and phase, they can be

    slightly different from each other. However, those wont affect in the calculations in a

    large scale.

    b.Negligible line resistance compared to reactance.When considering the impedances in transmission lines, reactance is much higher than

    the resistance. Hence, it is not much an error to neglect the resistance.

    c. Negligible load currents compared to fault currents.When comparing with the fault current, the load currents are very small. While the load

    currents are in Amperes range, the fault currents are at the range of kilo Amperes at the

    fault. Hence, the effect from the load current to the system can be neglected when

    comparing with the effect from the fault current.

    d.Shunt capacitances are negligible.

    e. Large systems may be represented by infinite bus bars.In larger systems, we can assume that the voltage and the frequency are constant. Hence,by using infinite bus bars, we can consider the voltage, the frequency to be constants,

    phase sequence and phase voltage.

    f. Transformers are on nominal tap position.Transformer impedances can be changed with the tap changings. By this assumption, we

    can use the nominal voltages of the primary and secondary windings of the transformer as

    well as the given impedances.

  • 7/30/2019 Fault Study - 100255K

    24/25

  • 7/30/2019 Fault Study - 100255K

    25/25

    REFERENCES

    Electrical Power Systems by Debapriya Das Principles of Power Systems by V.K.Mehta Power Systems II-Lec 1, Lec 2, Lec 3Lecture Slides & Notes http://www.elect.mrt.ac.lk/EE423_%20Fault_Analysis_Notes.pdf http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fault_(power_engineering)

    http://www.elect.mrt.ac.lk/EE423_%20Fault_Analysis_Notes.pdfhttp://www.elect.mrt.ac.lk/EE423_%20Fault_Analysis_Notes.pdfhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fault_(power_engineering)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fault_(power_engineering)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fault_(power_engineering)http://www.elect.mrt.ac.lk/EE423_%20Fault_Analysis_Notes.pdf