Fault Detection by a Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope
description
Transcript of Fault Detection by a Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope
![Page 1: Fault Detection by a Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681628f550346895dd2fd67/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Fault Detection by a Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope
Sherif M. Hanafy
![Page 2: Fault Detection by a Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681628f550346895dd2fd67/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Outline
• Introduction• Motivation. Get super resolution by TRM• Method. TRM & mute-window test• Synthetic Test. 2D elastic simulation• Field Test. 3D fault test• Conclusions
![Page 3: Fault Detection by a Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681628f550346895dd2fd67/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Outline
• Introduction• Motivation. Get super resolution by TRM• Method. TRM & The mute-window test• Synthetic Test. 2D elastic simulation• Field Test. 3D fault test• Conclusions
![Page 4: Fault Detection by a Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681628f550346895dd2fd67/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Introduction: Resolution
L
Z
Δx
X
Depth
Rayleigh resolutionLZx
2
Abbe resolution2
x
Super resolution2
x
![Page 5: Fault Detection by a Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681628f550346895dd2fd67/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Outline
• Introduction• Motivation. Get super resolution by TRM• Method. TRM & The mute-window test• Synthetic Test. 2D elastic simulation• Field Test. 3D fault test• Conclusions
![Page 6: Fault Detection by a Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681628f550346895dd2fd67/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Motivation
Motivation: Achieve super resolution
IBM, 1986, Scanning Tunneling Microscope
Problem: Source and receiver need to be in the near-field
Solution: Use scatterer points
![Page 7: Fault Detection by a Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681628f550346895dd2fd67/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Outline
• Introduction• Motivation. Get super resolution by TRM• Method. TRM & The mute-window test• Synthetic Test. 2D elastic simulation• Field Test. 3D fault test• Conclusions
![Page 8: Fault Detection by a Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681628f550346895dd2fd67/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Post-stack Migration
𝑮(𝒈∨𝒔𝒐)
ZO Migration Formula
𝒎 (𝒔′ )=∑𝒈𝑮∗(𝒈∨𝒔′ )𝑮(𝒈∨𝒔𝒐 )
𝒔 ′ImagePlane
𝒔𝒐
MeasuredData
CalculatedData
![Page 9: Fault Detection by a Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681628f550346895dd2fd67/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Post-stack Migration with Point Scatterer
𝑮(𝒈∨𝒔𝒐) ZO Migration Formula
𝒎 (𝒔′ )=∫−𝝎
𝝎
∫−𝑳
𝑳
𝑮 (𝒔𝒐|𝒔 )𝑮 (𝒈|𝒔𝒐 )𝑮∗ (𝒔𝒐|𝒔 ′ )𝑮∗ (𝒈|𝒔𝒐 )𝒅𝒈𝒅𝝎
𝒔 ′ImagePlane
𝒔𝒐
𝒔𝑮(𝒔𝒐∨𝒔)
MeasuredData
CalculatedData
![Page 10: Fault Detection by a Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681628f550346895dd2fd67/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Post-stack Migration with Point Scatterer𝒎 (𝒔′ )=∫
−𝝎
𝝎
∫−𝑳
𝑳
𝑮 (𝒔𝒐|𝒔 )𝑮 (𝒈|𝒔𝒐 )𝑮∗ (𝒔𝒐|𝒔 ′ )𝑮∗ (𝒈|𝒔𝒐 )𝒅𝒈𝒅𝝎
𝑮 ( 𝒙|𝒙′ )= 𝒆𝒊𝝎|𝒙−𝒙′|/𝒄
¿ 𝒙−𝒙 ′∨¿¿
𝒎 (𝒔′ )=∫−𝝎
𝝎 𝒆𝒊 𝝎(|𝒔−𝒔𝒐❑|−|𝒔 ′−𝒔𝒐
❑|)/𝒄
(|𝒔−𝒔𝒐❑||𝒔 ′−𝒔𝒐
❑|)𝒅𝝎∫
−𝑳
𝑳 𝟏¿𝒈−𝒔𝒐¿
𝟐 𝒅𝒈
𝒎 (𝒔′ )=𝒔𝒊𝒏 ¿¿
𝒎 (𝒔′ )=𝑨 .𝑩
0.2 0.7S’
|s-s0| ~
S’0.2 0.7
|s-s0| ~ /40
Near-field->super-resolution Far-field->Rayleigh resolution
![Page 11: Fault Detection by a Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681628f550346895dd2fd67/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Time Reversal Mirror(TRM)
![Page 12: Fault Detection by a Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681628f550346895dd2fd67/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Time Reversal Mirrors (TRM)
𝑮(𝒈∨𝒔𝒐)
ZO Migration Formula
𝒎 (𝒔′ )=∑𝒈𝑮∗(𝒈∨𝒔′ )𝑮(𝒈∨𝒔𝒐 )
𝒔 ′ImagePlane
𝒔𝒐
MeasuredData
CalculatedData
![Page 13: Fault Detection by a Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681628f550346895dd2fd67/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Time Reversal Mirrors (TRM)
𝑮(𝒈∨𝒔𝒐)
ZO Migration Formula
𝒎 (𝒔′ )=∑𝒈𝑮∗(𝒈∨𝒔′ )𝑮(𝒈∨𝒔𝒐 )
𝒔 ′ImagePlane 𝒔𝒐
MeasuredData
CalculatedData
𝒔 ′
MeasuredData
TRM Profile
![Page 14: Fault Detection by a Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681628f550346895dd2fd67/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Summary
0.2 0.7S’
|s-s0| ~
S’0.2 0.7
|s-s0| ~ /40
Near-field->super-resolution Far-field->Rayleigh resolution
ImagePlane 𝒔𝒐𝒔 ′
TRM Profile
![Page 15: Fault Detection by a Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681628f550346895dd2fd67/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Outline
• Introduction• Motivation. Get super resolution by TRM• Method. The mute-window test• Synthetic Test. 2D elastic simulation• Field Test. 3D fault test• Conclusions
![Page 16: Fault Detection by a Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681628f550346895dd2fd67/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Velocity Model
120 receivers at 1 m receiver interval120 shots at 1 m shot interval
Dep
th (m
)
X (m)
0
400 120
Vp (m/s)500 3500Vs (m/s)250 1750Density (gm/cc)2.0 2.6
![Page 17: Fault Detection by a Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681628f550346895dd2fd67/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
TRM ProfilesSource # 34 Source # 80A
mpl
itude
Trial Source
1
-0.21 120
TRM ProfileNo traces are muted
Am
plitu
de
Trial Source
1
-0.21 120
TRM Profile21 traces are muted
Am
plitu
de
Trial Source
1
-0.21 120
TRM Profile101 traces are muted
Am
plitu
de
Trial Source
1
-0.21 120
TRM ProfileNo traces are muted
Am
plitu
de
Trial Source
1
-0.21 120
TRM Profile21 traces are muted
Am
plitu
de
Trial Source
1
-0.21 120
TRM Profile101 traces are muted
![Page 18: Fault Detection by a Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681628f550346895dd2fd67/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
TRM ImagesSource # 34 Source # 80M
ute-
win
dow
Siz
e
Trial Source
0
1111 120
Source Location
a) TRM Image of Shot # 34
Mut
e-w
indo
w S
ize
Trial Source
0
1111 120
Source Location
b) TRM Image of Shot # 80
Scatterers in the near-field of the sourceReceiver are only at far-field
Scatterers in the far-field of the sourceReceiver are only at far-field
![Page 19: Fault Detection by a Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681628f550346895dd2fd67/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Outline
• Introduction• Motivation. Get super resolution by TRM• Method. TRM & The mute-window test• Synthetic Test. 2D elastic simulation• Field Test. 3D fault test• Summary
![Page 20: Fault Detection by a Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681628f550346895dd2fd67/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Field Test
• Data Collected at Washington Fault Area, north of Arizona, USA.
• 6 Lines of receivers/shots• 80 receivers/line at 1 m
receiver interval• 40 shots/line at 2 m shot
interval
![Page 21: Fault Detection by a Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681628f550346895dd2fd67/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Data Collection
![Page 22: Fault Detection by a Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681628f550346895dd2fd67/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Tomography and Ground Truth
![Page 23: Fault Detection by a Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681628f550346895dd2fd67/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Super Resolution Test
Pixel size: 2 x 1.5 m2
Wavelength: 10 m
Fault
![Page 24: Fault Detection by a Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681628f550346895dd2fd67/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Migration Image – Traces within 0.8 λ are mutedMigration Image – Traces within 0.4 λ are muted
Super Resolution Results
Migration Image – Traces within 0.1 λ are mutedMigration Image using All TracesFault
![Page 25: Fault Detection by a Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681628f550346895dd2fd67/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Outline
• Introduction• Motivation. Get super resolution by TRM• Method. TRM & The mute-window test• Synthetic Test. 2D elastic simulation• Field Test. 3D fault test• Conclusions
![Page 26: Fault Detection by a Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681628f550346895dd2fd67/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Conclusions• TRM profiles have the shape of
a sink curve if no scatterer in the near-field of the shot point
• TRM profiles have the shape of a spike if scatterer exists in the near-field of the shot point
• Muting the near-field traces tends to decrease the amplitude of the TRM profile and its resolution
0.2 0.7S’
|s-s0| ~
S’0.2 0.7
|s-s0| ~ /40
![Page 27: Fault Detection by a Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681628f550346895dd2fd67/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Possible Applications
Find local anomalies, faults, and scatterer points around boreholes in VSP data
Ground
Borehole
![Page 28: Fault Detection by a Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681628f550346895dd2fd67/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Thank You