FARNET Guide „Results-oriented CLLD in fisheries areas” · 11/14/2016 · •Stronger focus on...
Transcript of FARNET Guide „Results-oriented CLLD in fisheries areas” · 11/14/2016 · •Stronger focus on...
FARNET Guide
„Results-oriented CLLD in fisheries areas”
Urszula Budzich-Tabor, FARNET Support Unit
EMFF Expert Group meeting Brussels, 14 November 2016
The rationale
• Stronger focus on results for all EU Funds 2014-2020
• It’s more than just monitoring & evaluation
• Designing a focused, results-oriented strategy, including indicators and targets
• Having a system for data collection and management
• Integrating results-orientation in all activities of the FLAG
• Trying to capture the broader impacts
Based on the outcomes of a transnational seminar (Helsinki, 24-26 May 2016)
Tool Fair – 10 examples of tools used or planned by FLAGs or MAs to measure and demonstrate results
Structure of the Guide: 6 Factsheets
There are also...
• Definitions of key concepts and terms
• Short descriptions of examples from FLAG or MA practice (current or previous period)
• Practical suggestions
Contribution from FAME SU
Available in EN, DE, ES, FR, HR, IT, PL
• Strategic objectives in the context of CLLD
• Formulating high quality objectives
(local needs, community involvement, broader objectives, SMART)
• “Problem tree” as a tool for formulating objectives
• Formulating objectives – an iterative process
Practices:
• Strategic objectives of Kaszuby FLAG (PL)
• Using SWOT to formulate objectives in Wagrien-Fehmarn FLAG (DE)
• The importance of indicators
• Ensuring high quality indicators (SMART or RACER)
• Common indicators for CLLD
• Setting targets Tip: questions useful in setting strategy targets
Practice:
• Employment Observatory, Pays de Vannes FLAG (FR)
• Monitoring and evaluation
• Data and information Sources, managing data, mandatory data
• Working with evaluators Practical steps
Practice:
• Project monitoring questionnaire in the Great Masurian Lakes FLAG (PL)
• The specificity of CLLD
• Achieving results through project selection
• Achieving results through animation and communication activities
• Achieving results through project development support
Practices:
• Project competition in Liepaja FLAG (LV)
• Project Result Oriented Management Information System (PROMIS) (DK)
• Supporting beneficiaries in the Ostend FLAG (BE)
OVERVIEW: an example of how it all fits together
• Why focus on FLAG performance?
• What is being assessed?
• Peer-to-peer evaluation
Practices:
• Key indicators for animation activities in Finland
• Peer-to-peer LAG evaluation in Sweden
• Peer-to-peer FLAG evaluation in France
• Broader impacts: what can CLLD do in fisheries areas?
• Measuring the broader impact of FLAG work
• Measuring the difficult to measure
Practices:
• Social Return on Investment in the Cornwall FLAG (UK)
• Measuring impacts in the National Community Empowerment Programme in Indonesia
Available at: https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/fpfis/cms/farnet/publications/guides
Fundedby the
follow us on
www.farnet.eu
Thank you for your attention!
Urszula Budzich-Tabor [email protected]