Farmer price realization
-
Upload
anand-thokal -
Category
Business
-
view
28 -
download
0
Transcript of Farmer price realization
Farmer Price RealizationJaved Akhtar KhanAnans S. Thokal
1
Current Scenario in F & V Market• 10% of total Indian agriculture
• 81.285 million metric tones of fruits and 162.19 million metric
tones of vegetables produce in 2012-13
• 2nd rank in world production
• 1% share in world market
• Dominated by intermediaries in supply chain
• Poor infrastructure, poor linkages in supply chain, lack of price
transparency
• Poor resultant price realization by producers
• High prices for consumers with lesser value
2
Stats at Indian Market
Price/kg of:- Tomato Potato Cabbage Cauliflower Bnana
Price paid by consumer(INR)
8.2 12 9 9.5 12
Price received by farmer(INR)
2 6.6 5 5.5 4
Markup % 310 82 80 73 200
Price Realization % 24.5 55 55 58 33.5
Yet Risk taken by farmers is highest!!!
3
Field Study on
• Price received by farmers and consumers
• Wastage at various stages
• Role of each intermediary and risk vs realization
• Operations at agricultural market yards
• Quality, hygiene, and shelf life of produce
4
Price
• Lack of price transparency
• Compulsion on selling due to poor logistics
• Smaller harvest lots, higher carrying costs
• Pilferages in SC (stealing money)
• Mix of size, shape, quality undifferentiated
• 1 farmer fooled and trapped by so many factors
5
Wastages
• Poor infrastructure, poor logistics
• 24% for potato to 40% for tomato across SC
• Poor multiple handling
• Improper bagging; no crating
• Lack of temperature controlled vehicles; storage facilities
Tomato Potato Cabbage Cauliflower Banana
Wastage % 40 24 36 24 306
Risk vs RealizationRisk Taken Cycle Time Margin
Farmer 4 ~3 months~11 months banana
55% cabbage;33.5% banana;24.5% tomato.
Consolidator 1 ~2 days 5%-10%
Market Wholesaler 3 ~2 days ~7% cabbage; ~28% banana
Semi-wholesaler 2 ~2 days ~2% cabbage; ~14% banana
Retailer 2 ~4 days ~10.5% cabbage;~55% banana
Considerably lesser margin as compared to the risk taken by producers
7
Quality
• Congested market
• Lack storage capacity for daily arrival volume
• Unsanitary conditions
• Accumulated wastage and poor drainage etc.
• Lack of preservation under cold storage
8
Operations at Market Yard
• Set of regulatory agents
• Unionized labors
• Regulated transportation system
• Results in Red-Tapism
• Auctions with prices by commission agents/traders
• Retailers pay fixed price and not the quoted one
• Dominant role of agents and traders
9
Suggestions by WriterModern System in Tomato
ProducerPrice: Rs.2
Wastage: 10%
ConsolidatorCommission: 10%
Wastage: 2%
Processor
Organized DistributorsP: Rs. 3.33
W: 5%
RetailersP: Rs. 6.5W: 10%
ConsumerP: Rs. 6.5
Markup 225%;P Realization up
by 25%
Total Wastage= 27%
10
Benefits to Farmers
Realization/qtl Tomato Potato Cabbage Cauliflower Banana
Traditional(INR) 79.15 561.6 426 390 342
Modern(INR) 98.76 583.44 430.13 474.36 353.4
Improvement % 25 4 1 22 3
11
Solution
Farmer Producer Company(FPC)
PRODUCER GROUPS
PRODUCER ORGANIZATIONS
12
What is Producer Group
• Farmers Producer Company (FPC) is a legal form of the
company. In 2002 an Act was passed in Parliament
• Only farmer – producers can be members of the FPC and the
farmer members themselves will manage this company.
• Paid staff can be employed
• Producers run the FPC.
• Promoted by the farmers, run by the farmers and for the
benefits of the farmers.
• Surplus would be shared among the farmers only.
13
Why FPC
• Collective inputs purchase
• Collective marketing
• Processing
• Increasing productivity through better inputs
• Increasing knowledge of farmers
• Ensuring quality
14
Impact on SCFPC System in Tomato
ProducerPrice: Rs.2.2
Wastage: 10%Processor
Organized DistributorsP: Rs. 3.33
W: 5%
RetailersP: Rs. 6.5W: 10%
ConsumerP: Rs. 6.5
Markup 196%;P Realization up
by 35%
Total Wastage= 25%
15
Impact Cont.
Realization/100kg Tomato
Traditional(INR) 79.15
Modern(INR) 98.76
FPC(INR) 106.85
Improvement % 25
16
Advantages of FPC
• Let’s take a look at the problems faced by farmers
17
18
THANK YOU
19