FALLACIES OF LOGIC
-
Upload
aladdin-riggs -
Category
Documents
-
view
55 -
download
3
description
Transcript of FALLACIES OF LOGIC
FALLACIES OF LOGIC
REASONING the process of drawing a conclusion
on the basis of evidence.
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE DEDUCTIVE: Reasoning from the general
to the specific (cause to effect) INDUCTIVE: Reasoning from detailed
facts to general principles.
http://www.sjsu.edu/depts/itl/graphics/induc/ind-ded.html
http://www.philosophypages.com/lg/e13.htm
Four Types of Reasoning
Reasoning from specific instances
Reasoning from principle
Causal reasoning
Analogical reasoning
FALLACIES-FAULTY REASONING
Red Herring
Ad Hominem
Either-Or
False Cause
Invalid Analogy
Bandwagon
Slippery Slope
Hasty/Sweeping
Generalizations
RED HERRING A fallacy that introduces an
irrelevant issue to divert attention from the subject under discussion.
AD HOMINEM A fallacy that attacks the person
rather than dealing with the real issue in dispute.
EITHER-OR A fallacy that forces listeners to
choose between two alternatives when more than two alternatives exist.
False Cause One event precedes the next so it
must be the cause.
Invalid Analogy Using an analogy in which the
concepts being compared in reality are not similar or do not have important enough similarities to justify the analogy as support.
SLIPPERY SLOPE A fallacy which assumes that
taking a first step will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be prevented.
BANDWAGON Everyone’s doing it!
HASTY/SWEEPING GENERALIZATIONS
Drawing conclusion on too few examples
OMITTED FACTS
Leaving out important facts because those facts might hurt your argument.
STACKED DECK
Presenting only information that supports your position
FALSE ASSUMPTIONS
Applying what is true in general to all.
EXAMPLEIn his essay on animal training, Roberto said
that food rewards are the only way to get animals to learn.
He was basing his conclusion on his experience with only two dogs. Audience members who had success training with other methods knew that Roberto had not considered enough animals before forming his opinion.
EXAMPLE
In an essay on wolves it might be tempting to assume that because wolves are like dogs in some ways, they are like them in all ways. Also, that since wolves are social, the idea of the lone wolf must be a myth.
However, while most wolves are social, a few do fall away from the pack.
Rather than using faulty reasoning, good writers recognize that their readers know that every position has some drawbacks. Instead of denying the drawbacks in your position, address them honestly. Show how they fail to outweigh the benefits of your position.