Fairfax High School Renovation and Addition Washington, DC M ICHAEL F UNK Construction Management.
-
Upload
maurice-patrick -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
1
Transcript of Fairfax High School Renovation and Addition Washington, DC M ICHAEL F UNK Construction Management.
Fairfax High SchoolFairfax High SchoolRenovation and AdditionRenovation and Addition
Washington, DCWashington, DC
MMICHAEL ICHAEL FFUNKUNK
Construction ManagementConstruction Management
Fairfax High SchoolRenovation and Addition
Presentation OutlinePresentation OutlineProject Overview
Analysis 1 – LEED® Guide
Analysis 2 – Phasing Layout
Analysis 3 – Foundation Excavation
Conclusions
Q&A
Michael Funk
Construction ManagementAE Senior Thesis 2007
Pennsylvania State University
Fairfax High SchoolRenovation and Addition
Project OverviewProject Overview
Michael Funk
Construction ManagementAE Senior Thesis 2007
Pennsylvania State University
Project Overview
Analysis 1 – LEED® Guide
Analysis 2 – Phasing Layout
Analysis 3 – Foundation
Conclusions
Q&A
Total Cost: $ 45 Million
Size: 410,000 Sq. Ft.2 Stories
Duration: 30 MonthsOriginal: March 2005 – September 2007
Building Function:High School
Facilities:Classrooms, Computer Lab, Gymnasium,Stage and Dressing Rooms, Dance Studio,Weight and Aerobics Rooms, Arts / Crafts,Music Room
Fairfax High SchoolRenovation and Addition
Project OverviewProject Overview
Michael Funk
Construction ManagementAE Senior Thesis 2007
Pennsylvania State University
Project Overview
Analysis 1 – LEED® Guide
Analysis 2 – Phasing Layout
Analysis 3 – Foundation
Conclusions
Q&A
Construction:
School must remain in session throughout the project duration
During school:
50 to 60 workers
Summer:
150 workers
Project Site:
Fairly Open Construction Site
Given 60 parking spaces
Trash sorted by concrete/CMU and steel despite there
being no recycling requirements
Fairfax High SchoolRenovation and Addition
Project OverviewProject Overview
Michael Funk
Construction ManagementAE Senior Thesis 2007
Pennsylvania State University
Project Overview
Analysis 1 – LEED® Guide
Analysis 2 – Phasing Layout
Analysis 3 – Foundation
Conclusions
Q&A
Traditional Delivery Method
Project Team:Owner: City of Fairfax School BoardProgram Manager: BeeryRio Architecture & InteriorsGeneral Contractor: Grunley Construction CompanyArchitects/ Engineers: Strickler Associates, Ehlert/Bryan, Adtek Engineers
Fairfax High SchoolRenovation and Addition
Michael Funk
Construction ManagementAE Senior Thesis 2007
Pennsylvania State University
BERNARD SCHULZE
GENERAL SUPERINTENDENT
SAFETYDIRECTOR
GREG MCHUGH
PROJ ECT MANAGER
ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENTS
FOREMEN
TRADESMEN
COORDINATORS
ASSISTANT PMS
COST ENGINEER
SCHEDULER
Subcontractors’ Home and Field Organizations
City of FairfaxSchool Board
On-Site Organization
Self-Performed Work
GRUNLEY SUPPORT TEAMAccounting & Human ResourcesEstimatingProcurementInformation TechnologiesCorporate SchedulingCorporate SafetyCorporate Quality AssuranceLEED CertificationField Operations & Training
CHIP SCOTT
PROJ ECT EXECUTIVEOff-Site Organization
PROJECT ORGANIZATIONAL CHARTFAIRFAX HIGH SCHOOL
STAFFING PLAN
Fairfax High SchoolRenovation and Addition
Michael Funk
Construction ManagementAE Senior Thesis 2007
Pennsylvania State University
Analysis 1 – LEED GuideAnalysis 1 – LEED Guide
Fairfax High SchoolRenovation and Addition
LEED GuideLEED Guide
Michael Funk
Construction ManagementAE Senior Thesis 2007
Pennsylvania State University
Project Overview
Analysis 1 – LEED® Guide
Analysis 2 – Phasing Layout
Analysis 3 – Foundation
Conclusions
Q&A
Problem• ‘Going green’ trend continues to increase• LEED points can be hard to obtain• Focus gets lost on the project
Existing Research• Setting early “green” goals is critical
Goal• Identify LEED® points that are attainable based on project
type• Develop a guide that can be distributed to project team to
aid in obtaining these points
Fairfax High SchoolRenovation and Addition
LEED GuideLEED Guide
Michael Funk
Construction ManagementAE Senior Thesis 2007
Pennsylvania State University
Project Overview
Analysis 1 – LEED® Guide
Analysis 2 – Phasing Layout
Analysis 3 – Foundation
Conclusions
Q&A
Research Steps:• Literature review to become more familiar with LEED®• Identify and interview different owners on different LEED® Rated
projects• Surveyed owners and project managers• Develop an outline for a guide that will benefit owners and project
managers from the start of a project• Developed a spreadsheet format for each LEED ® point • Had several project managers test out the guide, obtained
feedback, and developed a final version
Fairfax High SchoolRenovation and Addition
LEED GuideLEED Guide
Michael Funk
Construction ManagementAE Senior Thesis 2007
Pennsylvania State University
Project Overview
Analysis 1 – LEED® Guide
Analysis 2 – Phasing Layout
Analysis 3 – Foundation
Conclusions
Q&A
Excel Spreadsheet:
Specification SectionDescriptionResponsible PartyMaterial CostLocationCommentsSubmission Deadline
Fairfax High SchoolRenovation and Addition
LEED GuideLEED Guide
Michael Funk
Construction ManagementAE Senior Thesis 2007
Pennsylvania State University
LEED LOG
Sp
ec
Secti
on
Description Resp Party Material Cost Location Comments Due By
08110Standard Steel Doors and Frames AG Mauro Sent: 6/29/05 Received: 7/8/2005
05310 Steel Deck and Plate AIW Sent: 6/29/05 Received: 7/8/200510605 Hardware Cloth AIW Sent: 6/29/05 Received: 7/8/200504065 Stone Mortar Atlantic Sent: 6/29/05 Received: 7/8/2005
07210Building Insulation - Product Data - STONE Atlantic Sent: 6/29/05 Received: 7/8/2005
07620Sheet Metal Flashing and Trim - Stonework Atlantic Sent: 6/29/05 Received: 7/8/2005
07900Joint Sealants - Stone Control Joints Atlantic Sent: 6/29/05 Received: 7/8/2005
08800Glass and Glazing - Transom Glass AV Smoot
Glass Manufacturer: Oldcastle Glass - Telford, PA Wood from existing/salvaged transoms Sent: 6/29/05 Received: 6/29/05 -
07814Interior Intumescent Fireproofing Ballard Sent: 6/29/05 Received: 7/8/2005
07900Joint Sealants - Partition Opening Perimeter Joints Ballard Sent: 6/29/05 Received: 7/8/2005
0990Temporary Cafeteria - Paint Ballard Sent: 6/29/05 Received:
09900Temporary Cafeteria - Epoxy Paint Ballard Sent: 6/29/05 Received: 7/8/2005
09900 Paint Ballard Sent: 6/29/05 Received: 7/8/200510270 Access Flooring Bettinger-West Sent: 6/29/05 Received: 7/8/2005
07210Building Insulation - Product Data - DRYWALL Coakley 8000.00 Inwood, WV Sent: 6/29/05 Received: 7/11/05 -
07900
Joint Sealants - Partition Perimeter and Control Joints Coakley n/a n/a Sent: 6/29/05 Received: 7/11/05 -
09100
Drywall Metal Support Assemblies, Metal Support Assemblies Coakley 120000.00 Baltimore, MD Sent: 6/29/05 Received: 7/11/05 -
09250
Gypsum Board - Temporary Cafeteria, Whole Project Coakley 54000.00 Baltimore, MD Sent: 6/29/05 Received: 7/11/05 -
09280 Plaster Restoration Coakley 141000.00 Baltimore, MD Sent: 6/29/05 Received: 7/11/05 -
09510Acoustical Ceilings, Fasteners Coakley
5000.0018000.00
Cloquet, MNStony Point, NY Sent: 6/29/05 Received: 7/11/05 -
09770Glass Fiber-Reinforced Wall Panels Coakley n/a n/a Sent: 6/29/05 Received: 7/11/05 -
Fairfax High SchoolRenovation and Addition
Michael Funk
Construction ManagementAE Senior Thesis 2007
Pennsylvania State University
Analysis 2 – Phasing Analysis 2 – Phasing LayoutLayout
Fairfax High SchoolRenovation and Addition
PhasingPhasing
Michael Funk
Construction ManagementAE Senior Thesis 2007
Pennsylvania State University
Project Overview
Analysis 1 – LEED® Guide
Analysis 2 – Phasing Layout
Analysis 3 – Foundation
Conclusions
Q&A
Functionality of the school caused for a unique schedule
Four Phases and Fourteen Areas
Phase 1Nine areas covered54% of the $1.2 million contingency usedHeavily front-end loaded
Fairfax High SchoolRenovation and Addition
PhasingPhasing
Michael Funk
Construction ManagementAE Senior Thesis 2007
Pennsylvania State University
Project Overview
Analysis 1 – LEED® Guide
Analysis 2 – Phasing Layout
Analysis 3 – Foundation
Conclusions
Q&A
Initial Layout:
Phase 1 – 9 Areas Phase 2 – 6 AreasArea A Area A
Area B Area C
Area D Area D
Area E Area G
Area I Area I
Area J Area E
Area L
Area M
Area N
Phase 3 – 4 Areas Phase 4 – 2 AreasArea F Area H
Area I Academy Work
Area K
Area J
Fairfax High SchoolRenovation and Addition
PhasingPhasing
Michael Funk
Construction ManagementAE Senior Thesis 2007
Pennsylvania State University
Project Overview
Analysis 1 – LEED® Guide
Analysis 2 – Phasing Layout
Analysis 3 – Foundation
Conclusions
Q&A
Re-Designed Layout:
Phase 1 – 4 Areas Phase 2 – 4 AreasArea A Area C
Area B Area D
Area M Area E
Area N Area H
Phase 3 – 3 Areas Phase 4 – 4 AreasArea F Area J
Area G Area K
Area I Area L
Academy Work
Fairfax High SchoolRenovation and Addition
PhasingPhasing
Michael Funk
Construction ManagementAE Senior Thesis 2007
Pennsylvania State University
Project Overview
Analysis 1 – LEED® Guide
Analysis 2 – Phasing Layout
Analysis 3 – Foundation
Conclusions
Q&A
New layout provides a more balanced schedule
Phase 3 is lighter to allow for make-up time if any previousPhases get behind
Places the work in a nice flow based on what work is being done and the school remaining open
Fairfax High SchoolRenovation and Addition
Michael Funk
Construction ManagementAE Senior Thesis 2007
Pennsylvania State University
Analysis 3 – Foundation PlacementAnalysis 3 – Foundation Placement
Fairfax High SchoolRenovation and Addition
FoundationFoundation
Michael Funk
Construction ManagementAE Senior Thesis 2007
Pennsylvania State University
Project Overview
Analysis 1 – LEED® Guide
Analysis 2 – Phasing Layout
Analysis 3 – Foundation
Conclusions
Q&A
Bulk Excavation (current) versus Trench Excavation
Goal:Reduce labor costs, schedule, and the amount of material used
Trench excavation eliminates the need for forming and reduces the amount of material removed and the amount of fill
Fairfax High SchoolRenovation and Addition
FoundationFoundation
Michael Funk
Construction ManagementAE Senior Thesis 2007
Pennsylvania State University
Table 1 - Cost Difference Summary
ItemTrench
ExcavationBulk
Excavation DifferenceMaterial (BCY) 483.545 1310.465 826.92Material (LCY) 531.9 1441.51 909.61Total Costs $13,946.96 $60,158.80 $46,211.84
Fairfax High SchoolRenovation and Addition
FoundationFoundation
Michael Funk
Construction ManagementAE Senior Thesis 2007
Pennsylvania State University
Table 3 - Schedule / ExcavatorDemand Impact
Item Equipment Labor (hrs/BCY) Total BCY Total hrs Total DaysTrench Excavation 1 C.Y. Hydraulic Backhoe 0.04 483.55 19.34 2.4Bulk Excavation 1 C.Y. Hydraulic Backhoe 0.027 1310.47 35.38 4.4
Difference: 16.04 2*Assume 8 hour work day** Productivity rates taken from R.S. Means 2006
Fairfax High SchoolRenovation and Addition
FoundationFoundation
Michael Funk
Construction ManagementAE Senior Thesis 2007
Pennsylvania State University
Project Overview
Analysis 1 – LEED® Guide
Analysis 2 – Phasing Layout
Analysis 3 – Foundation
Conclusions
Q&A
Outcome• Increased safety measures must be taken• Trench Method Saves
– $46,211• Reduced spoils
• Removal of formwork labor
and materials
– 2 days off schedule– 826 BCY reduction in spoils
• Reduced by roughly 77%• Reduced site disturbance
Fairfax High SchoolRenovation and Addition
Michael Funk
Construction ManagementAE Senior Thesis 2007
Pennsylvania State University
ConclusionsConclusions
Fairfax High SchoolRenovation and Addition
ConclusionsConclusions
Michael Funk
Construction ManagementAE Senior Thesis 2007
Pennsylvania State University
Project Overview
Analysis 1 – LEED® Guide
Analysis 2 – Phasing Layout
Analysis 3 – Foundation
Conclusions
Q&A
LEED® GuideDeveloped spreadsheet design to aid in obtaining various points
Phasing LayoutAdjusted the existing phasing to ease the schedule
Foundation PlacementTrench foundation placement method is a feasible alternative
• Reduces quantities of spoils and associated costs
Fairfax High SchoolRenovation and Addition
ConclusionsConclusions
Michael Funk
Construction ManagementAE Senior Thesis 2007
Pennsylvania State University
Acknowledgements:
Penn State Architectural Engineering Faculty
Grunley Construction Company
All of the LEED® Rated project personnel
Fellow AE students and LP friends
Most importantly: Mom, Dad, and Molly
Project Overview
Analysis 1 – LEED® Guide
Analysis 2 – Phasing Layout
Analysis 3 – Foundation
Conclusions
Q&A
Fairfax High SchoolRenovation and Addition
Michael Funk
Construction ManagementAE Senior Thesis 2007
Pennsylvania State University
Questions/Suggestions?Questions/Suggestions?Project Overview
Analysis 1 – LEED® Guide
Analysis 2 – Phasing Layout
Analysis 3 – Foundation
Conclusions
Q&A