Fair Trade and Textiles - The Case of CoopNatural - Summary
-
Upload
joao-fontes -
Category
Documents
-
view
170 -
download
2
Transcript of Fair Trade and Textiles - The Case of CoopNatural - Summary
Fair Trade and Textiles: A comparative analysis of marketing alternatives
The case of CoopNatural in Brazil
João Fontes Centre for International Cooperation
vrije Universiteit amsterdam August 2007
|| SUMMARY ||
1
Peace, development and environmental protection are interdependent and indivisible.
Principle 25 of Rio Declaration, 1992
i
2
Acknowledgements
The author wishes to thank William Critchley, Nicolien van der Grijp, Marjan van Herwijnen
and Michiel van Drunen for their invaluable supervision and support. In addition, many thanks
to those who have been fundamental during this research: Maysa Gadelha (CoopNatural) and
Luciana Rabay (Braziliant); Verónica Pérez and Alex Assanvo (FLO); Ada Garcia, Antje Kachel
and Rocio Sanz (FLO-Cert); Edwin Koster (Made-By); Piet den Toom (Kuyichi); Katarina
Kempe and Henrik Lampa (H&M); Nicole Bassett (Patagonia); João Rêgo, Rita de Cássia,
Adriana Santos, Michele, Mariana Manfredi, Rosalina Nunes, Massimo Marocco, Renata Giles
and William Lana (customers of CoopNatural), and all anonymous interviewees at Kalverstraat
and to Corinne Cornelisse for standing there with him. Finally, special thanks to his parents and
to Marieke for her love and unconditional support.
ii
3
Table of Contents
List of tables 1
List of figures 2
Executive summary 3
1. Introduction 4
1.1 Context 4
1.2 Motivation 5
1.3 Goal 5
1.4 Research question 5
1.5 Scope of analysis 6
1.7 Outline of the report 8
2. Methodology 9
2.1 Research phases 9
2.2 Methods and considerations 11
2.2.1 Identification of marketing alternatives 11
2.2.2 Interviews 14
2.2.2.1 CoopNatural 14
2.2.2.2 Fair trade companies and organisations 14
2.2.2.3 Stores 14
2.2.2.4 Customers 15
2.2.3 Data processing and analysis 15
2.2.3.1 Processing data 16
2.2.3.2 Analysing data 17
3. Linkages between environment, poverty and trade 19
3.1 Poverty and Environment 19
3.2 Trade and Environment 22
3.3 Trade and Poverty 23
3.4 Impact of free trade on developing countries 24
3.5 Fair Trade and Organic: alternatives for developing countries? 26
3.5.1 Organic 27
3.5.1.1 Business as usual 27
3.5.1.2 What is Organic and how it addresses these issues 27
3.5.1.3 Market trends 28 3.5.2 Fair Trade
28
iii
4
3.5.2.1 Business as usual 28
3.5.2.2 What is Fair Trade and how it addresses these issues 29
3.5.2.3 Comparison with Organic Agriculture 31
3.5.2.4 Market trends 32
3.5.3 Cross-cutting issues 32
4. CoopNatural 35
4.1 Socio-economic regional data 35
4.2 The cooperative 36
4.2.1 Operations 36
4.2.2 Organisation 37
4.2.3 A history of challenges 38
4.2.4 The strategy of the cooperative 38
5. Stakeholders’ perceptions about fair trade 40
5.1 CoopNatural 40
5.2 Stores 41
5.3 Fair trade organisations and companies 42
5.4 Consumers 45
6. Requirements and costs imposed by marketing alternatives 51
6.1 Requirements 51
6.2 Remarks on critical requirements 54
6.3 CoopNatural's evaluation on requirements 57
6.4 Costs 59
6.5 Complementary criteria: Increase in Sales and Time 60
6.6 Facts Tables for Multi Criteria Analysis 61
7. Multi Criteria Analysis (MCA) 63
7.1 Weighting 63
7.2 Ranking 64
7.3 Sensitivity analysis 65
7.4 Summary of MCA and Interpretation 68
8. Conclusions 69
9. Recommendations 71
References 74
Abbreviations and acronyms 79
Glossary of terms 80
Annexes 82
iv
1
Executive summary
Fair trade emerged in response to the discrepancies in trade relations and the impact of free trade
on developing countries. In essence it states that working conditions in those countries should be
fair and trade should not compromise the environment. Fair trade can open new markets for
companies and organisations in southern countries, as in the case of the cooperative
CoopNatural, analysed in this research.
CoopNatural is based in Brazil and operates in the textile sector using naturally coloured organic
cotton. The cooperative covers the whole production chain of the textiles, from the production
of organic cotton to sewing and marketing. It intends to go fair as it believes that such
competitive advantage will help it withstand the pressure from global competitors, and allow
further investments in social and environmental aspects within its group. However, finding its
way in the fair trade market is by no means a simple task since each marketing alternative has
particular requirements, transaction costs and strategic implications. Therefore, the main
objective of this research is to find the best fair trade marketing alternative for CoopNatural,
taking into account economic, social and environmental impacts.
Four marketing alternatives were analysed: 1) obtaining the international fair trade label of FLO;
2) obtaining the Dutch fair textile label of Made-By; 3) becoming a supplier of Kuyichi, a well
established fair trade brand; and 4) becoming a supplier of H&M, a corporate social responsible
retailer. Economic, social and environmental impacts were considered, as well as costs and
potential increase in sales volume. Different stakeholders have also been consulted. Multi criteria
analysis (MCA) was performed to compare these alternatives. The results of MCA showed FLO
as the best alternative for the cooperative, followed close by Kuyichi. FLO was more
advantageous with regard to social and environmental aspects, while Kuyichi was more
economically beneficial. Made-By and H&M were less economically beneficial than the first two
alternatives due to geographical constraints that resulted in high logistics and adaptation costs.
The author advises CoopNatural to apply for the certificate of FLO, although Kuyichi has
proven to be more economically beneficial. By joining FLO CoopNatural will gain access to new
markets, and maximize social and environmental benefits. Nonetheless the cooperative might not
be able to afford it. Going fair will also demand considerable effort to adapt to environmental
requirements, especially regarding water use. Having these obstacles in mind, this case illustrates
how fair trade can either help or mobilise initiatives such as CoopNatural achieving their goals.
2
1. Introduction
1.1 Context
This research took place at Centre for International Cooperation (CIS), in the Netherlands, under
supervision of William Critchley. Nicolien van der Grijp and Marjan van Herwijnen were 1st and
2nd IVM supervisors respectively.
The framework of this investigation is the relationship between environment, poverty and trade.
It analyses fair trade and how this market based mechanism can help a cooperative in a
developing country playing an active role in world trade and, at the same, reduce poverty and
avoid environmental degradation.
The concept of fair trade emerged in 1985 in reaction to the unfair conditions of international
trade faced by developing countries. Although fair trade is not a niche market by definition, it is
basically supported by ethical consumers aware of social and environmental issues resulting from
trade and production processes. Fair trade differs from free trade since it internalizes social and
environmental costs. The former is focused on social and environmental conditions under which
a product is produced and traded, while the primary objective of the latter is the maximization of
profit. Fair trade will be discussed in depth in Chapter 3.
The case analysed here is in respect to the cooperative CoopNatural, which is based in north-
eastern Brazil. It operates in the textile sector using naturally coloured organic cotton as raw
material, i.e. the cotton complies with organic standards and it is free of dyeing. The present
members of the cooperative are entrepreneurs, consultants and a farmer involved in the whole
production chain of the textiles, starting from the production of organic cotton to sewing and
marketing. It is currently trading end products (clothes, toys, decoration and accessories) in the
Brazilian market and in a few stores abroad.
CoopNatural was founded in 2000 with the mission "to strengthen the coloured cotton textile
sector, selling products that are socially and ecologically correct by encouraging family-based
agriculture and local artisans" (CoopNatural, 2007). One of its main priorities at the moment is to
start operating in the fair trade market. CoopNatural believes that such competitive advantage
will help it standing the pressure from global competitors and keep on continuously improving
social and environmental aspects within its production chain. CoopNatural will be presented in
details in Chapter 4.
3
1.2 Motivation
Going fair, however, is a complex process. What makes it particularly difficult is the wide range
of marketing alternatives within the fair trade market. Since CoopNatural operates in the textile
sector, it can for instance apply for an international fair trade label, or a national one. It can also
become a supplier of an established fair trade brand, or it can supply a “fair trade–like” retailer.
Each marketing alternative has particular requirements, transaction costs and strategic
implications such as market share.
Besides this, since fair trade is not regulated by law, anyone can take the initiative to set up a new
fair trade scheme, create a new label or add something in the package of a product in a way that it
looks like fair trade. This also means a risk if looking from the perspective of the consumers who
may loose track of the concept, no longer knowing what to buy or whom to trust.
Therefore CoopNatural inevitably came up with the pertinent question: What is the best fair
trade marketing alternative for us? In view of the complexity level of this problem, the
cooperative has asked for advice.
1.3 Goal
The aim of this research is to look for the best alternative for CoopNatural, meaning which
marketing alternative better suits the cooperative and not the other way around. The importance
of this approach is that organisations in developing countries are usually confronted with rules
and schemes coming from developed countries which not always suit them or answer their needs.
The final goal of this investigation is to analyse a set of marketing alternatives and their respective
economic, social and environmental impacts, in order to provide CoopNatural with strategic
advice on fair trade. In addition, the methodology developed during this research can form a
model to be used as a basis for similar case studies.
1.4 Research question
The main question to be answered is “What is the best fair trade marketing alternative for the
cooperative CoopNatural, taking into account environmental, social and economic impacts?” In
order to do so, a few sub-questions will have to be answered regarding the requirements of
marketing alternatives, as well as their strategic, economic, environmental and social impacts.
4
Requirements:
1. Which marketing alternatives exist and what are their requirements?
Strategic:
2. How can fair trade help CoopNatural achieving its goals?
3. What will have to be adjusted in the business processes of CoopNatural to comply with the
requirements of each marketing alternative?
4. Can CoopNatural adapt its business processes to the requirements of each alternative and, if
so, how much effort will it cost?
Economics:
5. What will be the financial cost for CoopNatural to comply with the requirements?
6. What will be the financial benefits after compliance in comparison to the current state of the
cooperative?
Environment:
7. What will be the environmental gains after compliance?
Social:
8. What will be the social gains after compliance?
1.5 Scope of analysis
In order to answer the main research question, four marketing alternatives have been selected: 1)
applying for international certification at FLO; 2) introducing own brand in the external market
with the certificate of Made-By; 3) becoming a supplier of a well established fair trade brand like
Kuyichi; and 4) why not also consider becoming a supplier of a corporate social responsible
retailer such as H&M. Their pluses and minuses will be compared with the current marketing
strategy currently in place at CoopNatural, i.e. trading its products indirectly via stores in Brazil
and abroad.
Taking a t-shirt as an example, Figure 1 below illustrates how the labels of the products produced
by CoopNatural would look like in each case. More details on marketing alternatives and why
these four alternatives have been chosen follow in section 2.2.1
5
Figure 1: T-shirts to be produced by CoopNatural in each case
Made in Brazil
Alternative 1: FLO
Made in Brazil
Alternative 4: H&M
Made in Brazil
Alternative 3: Kuyichi
Made in Brazil
Alternative 2: Made-By
6
4. CoopNatural
This chapter is dedicated to CoopNatural. It starts with a brief introduction to the socio-
economic context of Brazil and region where CoopNatural is based. Then it provides detailed
information about the cooperative itself.
4.1 Socio-economic regional data
Brazil is a country with big differences between the poor and the rich, north and south. One
might get confused when looking at numbers of the Brazilian economy and its social indicators.
It is indeed a country characterized by inequality. Table 5 provides a short comparison between
Brazil and The Netherlands in terms of the indicators Human Development Indicator (HDI),
Gini and Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
Table 5: Comparison between Brazil and the Netherlands
HDI in 2006
(source: UNDP,2007)
Gini in 2006
(source: UNDP, 2007)
Total GDP in 2005
in millions of US dollars
(source: World Bank, 2007)
The Netherlands 10 30,9 624
Brazil 69 58,0 796
Brazil is divided in five regions: Northeast, northwest, mid-west, southeast and south. The
cooperative is located in the north-eastern state of Paraíba (see in Figure 5). Although both mid-
west and northwest regions have a lower share in terms of national GDP than northeast (13.8%),
poverty is at most concentrated in northeast. It is also in the northeast where the Brazilian semi-
arid is situated, a region characterized by scarcity of water. The biggest and richest cities in the
country are located in the south and southeast.
The state of Paraíba is divided itself in sub-regions that basically vary regarding economic activity,
land use and water availability. Campina Grande has an area of 620 km², 368 thousand
inhabitants and it is situated in the semi-arid (Almeida, 2005).
The levels of poverty, unemployment and illiteracy in Paraíba are high. 52% of the population
earns under half of the minimum wage and 71% of the rural population is under the poverty line.
10% of the population is unemployed and 20% is illiterate. Industry has a share of 46% of the
7
GDP in Campina Grande and cotton is the second export product (IPEA, 2007; IBGE, 2007;
Desenvolvimento, 2007). Other socio-economic indicators of the region are available in
AnnexV.
Figure 5: Map of Brazil
4.2 The cooperative
This section explains how CoopNatural is operating and how it is organised. Furthermore it
provides a summary of the history of the cooperative, as well as the strategy of development and
market positioning that has been adopted, and the challenges it faces.
4.2.1 Operations
CoopNatural produces clothes, toys, decoration and accessories made with organic cotton grown
in the region (CoopNatural, 2007). It sells its products indirectly and most of its clients are stores
in Brazil. However as the quality of its products is high enough to satisfy international standards,
CoopNatural is exporting since its foundation. At the moment the products are being sold via
direct and indirect channels abroad, mainly in Australia, England, Italy, Portugal and the USA.
Paraíba
8
4.2.2 Organisation
At the moment CoopNatural consists of 31 members: 22 entrepreneurs, 8 consultants and 1
farmer. All together are responsible for about 1300 direct and indirect jobs. The organisation of
CoopNatural is shown in Figure 6. The basis of the production chain consists of one private
farmer (40 hectares) and one group of small farmers that together supply the cotton (20 hectares
in total). As illustrated, the production chain goes beyond the boundaries of the cooperative
itself, including non-members third parties such as groups of artisans.
1 - Production of cotton
1 - Production of cotton Fazenda Santo Antonio Arribaçã (NGO)
1 member, 35 jobs non-member, 20 families
2 – Processing of cotton Campal non-member, 40 jobs
3 - Threading
Textil Ervest 1 member, 60 jobs
“MALHARIA”
4 – Flat weaving 5 – Hosiery mesh Pirapama Unitextil
non-member, # jobs
non-member, 38 jobs
6 – Design, modelling cut,
7 - Other manufacturers sales, marketing and administration 8 - Sewing
Entre Fios (decoration) Facção Ramyl 1 member, 40 jobs 2 members, 10 jobs
Eva Calçados (shoes and bags) Facção Edwirgens 2 members, 35 jobs 1 member, 15 jobs
Mix (kids fashion) Facção Terral 1 member, 10 jobs 1 member, 20 jobs
Facção Sempre Viva 1 member, 10 jobs
CoopNatural Facção Leidjane
9 - Others central office 1 member, 5 jobs
Groups of Artisans Facção Mano a Mano non-members, 281 jobs 1 member, 15 jobs
Ki Bordados (embroidery) Facção Formato X 1 member, 5 jobs 1 member, 5 jobs
Seicom Serigrafia (silk screen) Cosmos Jeans 1 member, 3 jobs 2 members, 10 jobs
2 members, 11 jobs
10 - Stores
Dona Terra 2 members, 5 jobs
others non-member, # jobs
Figure 6: Production chain of CoopNatural
9
A special point to be emphasised is the inclusion of NGO Arribaçã in the production chain.
Brazil is a country where small farmers often have to fight for land, usually owned by just a few
people. In short, the government has been working on granting pieces of private unproductive
areas to groups of small farmers who do not own anything else. However, after the definition of
property rights these groups struggle to find the means to produce and to become active in the
economy. NGO Arribaçã works on creating new economic opportunities for this group in the
region of Campina Grande, where CoopNatural is based. The cooperative has recently made an
agreement with Arribaçã to include a group of 20 families that have got 20 hectares all together
to supply the cooperative with organic cotton. The families are now following what Arribaçã calls
“eco-agriculture”, where they grow organic cotton together with maize and beans for own
subsistence.
4.2.3 A history of challenges
CoopNatural was founded in 2000 with the mission "to strengthen the coloured cotton textile
sector, selling products that are socially and ecologically correct by encouraging family-based
agriculture and local artisans" (CoopNatural, 2007). Despite its persistent growing business, the
challenges CoopNatural faces have always been and remain big. In fact it was founded as a local
initiative to respond to the pressure of global competitors. The textile sector in Brazil is
dominated by well established national brands. Besides that, the share of global competitors in
the local market is growing every year.
4.2.4 The strategy of the cooperative
Positioning its end products in the external market is the alternative found by CoopNatural to
ensure the revenue needed to keep the cooperative running and to promote sustainable
development. Therefore, CoopNatural identified the need to add value to its products to form
the basis for a competitive advantage.
Phase 1: Organic naturally coloured cotton
From the very beginning the cooperative got involved in the development of organic naturally
coloured cotton, which was an innovative initiative of EMBRAPA (Brazilian Agricultural
Research Corporation). EMBRAPA started growing the first variation BR 200 Brown in 2000.
BRS Green was introduced in 2003, and both BRS Ruby and BRS Sapphire in 2005. These
10
varieties are based on crossing and do not come down to any genetic modification. This kind of
cotton not only reduces production costs, but also the emission of chemicals since it does not
require any use of dying (EMBRAPA, 2007). There are just a few producers in the world
growing naturally coloured cotton at the moment, but the cotton grown by the supplier-member
of CoopNatural is ahead with complying with the international standards for quality. More
information about Naturally Coloured Cotton can be found in Annex IV.
Phase 2: Organic certification and fair trade
Keeping in mind the need to add more value to the end product, the cooperative decided after
the development of organic naturally coloured cotton to apply for the organic certification and
then to carry out fair trade. In the last two years CoopNatural has worked to comply with the
requirements of IBD, which is the certificating body for organic producers in Brazil, recognized
by IFOAM. The expectation is that this process is going to be concluded by mid 2007, when
CoopNatural will be producing its garments with a minimum of 80% of organic naturally
coloured cotton.
11
7. Multi Criteria Analysis (MCA)
In order to answer the question “What is the best marketing alternative for CoopNatural”, Multi Criteria
Analysis (MCA) was performed with the support of Definite (see section 2.2.3.2) to compare
marketing alternatives. The basis of MCA was the Facts Tables presented in previous section.
This chapter presents the results extracted from Definite and analyses them.
7.1 Weighting
CoopNatural has attributed the following weights to the criteria in the Facts Table:
Table 16: Weights Level 1: Level 2: Level 3:
Economic = 35%
Social = 35%
Environmental = 20%
Time = 10%
within Economic:
Effort = 30%
Benefits = 20%
Costs = 50%
within Benefits:
Increase in sales = 80%
Other economic benefits = 20%
within Costs:
Fees and auditing = 50%
Other investments = 50%
within Social:
Effort = 30%
Benefits = 70%
within Environmental:
Effort = 30%
Benefits = 70%
CoopNatural considered Economic and Social impacts as the most important ones. This level of
importance was translated in terms of weights in the decision making process. Hence Economic
and Social impacts were attributed with a weight of 35% each, while Environmental impacts and
the Time factor (i.e. how long the processed will take) weighted 20% and 10% respectively.
Within the group of Economic impacts, the most important point for the cooperative was to
avoid costs. Economic Costs have been attributed with weight of 50%, while Economic Benefits
(i.e. the added value to the cooperative) weighted only 20%. Within Economic Benefits, increase
12
in sales was the most relevant aspect (weight = 80%). Within Social and Environmental impacts,
CoopNatural was more focused on Benefits from complying with requirements (i.e. the added
value to the cooperative by complying with requirements) than on Effort demanded to comply
with them.
7.2 Ranking
The ranking of alternatives provided by Definite was shown in Figure 16:
Figure 16: Ranking of alternatives
FLO scored slightly above Kuyichi, followed by H&M and Made-By. As illustrated in Figure 17,
Kuyichi scored higher in Economic and Time, while FLO lead in Social and Environmental.
0,58
13
Figure 17: Ranking of alternatives per group of criteria
7.3 Sensitivity analysis
Weight uncertainty
- Check #1: What if weights attributed to Economic Effort and Benefits (see Table 16) switched,
having Benefits higher than Effort, in line with weights attributed to Social and Environmental
criteria?
Answer: The rank would not change as illustrated in Figure 18.
Figure 18: Sensitivity analysis on Level 2 weights
14
Score uncertainty
- Check #2: What if scores attributed to ‘increase in sales’, ‘fees and auditing’ and ‘other
investments’ are wrong?
Answer: Considering possible variation in 30% for ‘increase in sales’ and ‘other investments’, and
10% for ‘fees and auditing’, the rank would not change either.
Reversal points
- Check #3: Under which condition would Kuyichi rank first?
Answer: The weighs would have to change at least to the levels pointed in Figure 19. Basically
Time would have be slightly more important, and the other criteria a little less relevant.
Figure 19: Reversal point between Kuyichi and FLO
- Check #4: Under which condition would ‘Made-By rank first?
Answer: It is not possible. Even with considerable changes, Made-By would rank as high as FLO,
but at that level Kuyichi would rank first, as in Figure 20.
15
Figure 20: Reversal point between Made-By and FLO
- Check #5: Under which condition would H&M rank first?
Answer: There is no possible reversal point for H&M and FLO. This is because H&M scores
lower than FLO in all aspects.
Figure 21 presents the ranking once again, now considering reversal points as well. FLO ranks
first and this position could be taken by Kuyichi if weights were changed at least to level
indicated in Figure 19.
Figure 21: Ranking of alternatives with reversal points
16
7.4 Summary of MCA and Interpretation
Multi criteria analysis (MCA) has been carried out to compare fair trade marketing alternatives
that have been pre-selected for the case of CoopNatural: FLO, Kuyichi, Made-By and H&M.
The analysis was based on environmental, social and economic impacts that would result from
logistic and financial requirements imposed by each alternative, as well as a potential increase in
sales and the time it would take in the transition process. Impacts were represented in terms of
costs to comply with requirements (i.e. fees plus adaptation costs), effort to comply and benefit
from complying. Hence the most appropriate alternative would be the one that, at the same time,
is more beneficial, less expensive and demands less effort than the other ones.
The start point was the list of requirements and fees imposed by each alternative. Costs to adapt,
effort to comply and benefits from complying with requirements have been estimated by
CoopNatural itself. Afterwards total costs, total benefits and total effort have been for each
group of criteria (i.e. economic, social and environmental) of each alternative. CoopNatural has
also defined priorities in terms of weights to be considered in the decision making process.
Economic and Social impacts were considered as the most important aspects, followed by
Environmental impacts and Time of process.
Data was uploaded in Definite to perform the MCA, taking into account all these considerations.
The result provided by Definite (Figure 16) showed that FLO had the highest overall score
(0.58), followed very close by Kuyichi (0.55). Overall scores of H&M and Made-BY were 0.46
and 0.44 respectively. It also showed that Kuyichi will lead this ranking in case the time factor
becomes a bit more important to CoopNatural while and the others become slightly less relevant
(Figure 21).
Looking at each component of the overall score (Figure 17), Definite showed that FLO was
more advantageous with regard to social and environmental aspects, while Kuyichi was more
economically beneficial and the transition process of Kuyichi takes less time than FLO’s. Made-
By and H&M were not economically beneficial in comparison to the first two alternatives due to
geographical constraints that resulted in high logistics costs. H&M scored nearly as much as FLO
in the social aspect, and virtually the same as Kuyichi and Made-By in the environmental criteria.
17
8. Conclusions
In response to the research question “What is the best fair trade marketing alternative for CoopNatural”,
considering environmental, social and economic impacts, as well as effort to comply with
requirements, benefits from complying and time spent in transition process, the author’s
conclusion is that FLO is the most advantageous option for the cooperative, although Kuyichi is
the most economic beneficial alternative. The Fairtrade certificate of FLO will open new markets
for the cooperative. Besides this, the conditions of FLO are the most social and environmental
beneficial. Yet the order of the financial investment to obtain the certificate of FLO is higher
than the investment needed to become a supplier of Kuyichi: € 30 thousand and € 26 thousand
respectively. Hence going for FLO or Kuyichi will basically depend on whether the cooperative
can afford one or the other. This criterion was not included in the formal analysis.
Made-By and H&M were not economically beneficial in comparison to the first two alternatives
due to geographical constraints that resulted in high logistics costs. Nonetheless, H&M scored
nearly as much as FLO in the social aspect, and virtually the same as Kuyichi and Made-By in the
environmental criteria. Finally, becoming a Made-By affiliate would require an extra effort for
CoopNatural to expand the current sales channels due to the geographic scope of Made-By.
Fair trade can help CoopNatural by opening up submarkets where the cooperative is not trading
yet. The actual demand from end consumers in the external market for FLO certified textiles, or
the demand from Made-By affiliates like Kuyichi for social responsible garments indicate a
market potential that justifies the interest of CoopNatural in becoming recognized as a fair trader.
Although the cooperative has already got good practices in place, they are not visible for the fair
trade market. Hence the need for such fair trade certificate granting credibility to the products of
the cooperative. In the case of CoopNatural, fair trade can not only mean gaining a competitive
advantage, but it can also add social and environmental value. By going fair the cooperative will
have a better control of environmental issues, especially usage of water, and it will focus even
more on small farmers, who will become a fundamental element in the production chain.
Obtaining the certificate of FLO will have a higher impact on the group of farmers supplying
CoopNatural than on the trade companies within its production chain, in terms of benefits from
complying with requirements as well as effort to comply and costs.
Nonetheless, there are several tariff and non-tariff obstacles in fair trade that may form a barrier
for CoopNatural entering in these markets. Trade, environment and poverty are intrinsic
18
connected and fair trade can play a positive role breaking negative linkages among these
elements. However, in reality it is not clear whether the cooperative can afford the initial
investments with fees and adaptation. The estimation made in this research was based on the
exclusion of some components within the current production chain. This results in a main social
impact, especially to the group of artisans, and it also requires adjustments in business processes,
since the fair trade-certified products of CoopNatural will involve less people.
Regarding social and environmental adjustments, the main challenges are concerning the group
of small farmers and water management. FLO requires that at least 50% of the cotton must be
produced by small farmers, but most of the cotton used by CoopNatural nowadays is produced
be a non-small farmer, i.e. a farmer with hired labour. It also requires increasing participation of
small farmers in the administration and internal control of their association. The difficulty here is
the fact the most of them are illiterate. FLO also calls for efficient irrigation systems and care
with ground water, although not as a minimum requirement for certification. It will demand
much effort from the cooperative to implement these measures. Still concerning FLO, its
requirements for small farmers will have a higher impact on CoopNatural than those for traders,
both in terms of costs, benefit and effort to comply. About organic cotton, Made-By is the only
scheme where it means a competitive advantage. However, in practice its affiliates are purchasing
white organic cotton to dye it afterwards, which to a certain extent withdraws the environmental
benefits of the naturally coloured organic cotton grown by CoopNatural.
Having said this, the current trend of fair trade textile is bipolar and it is only appropriate for
farmers of seed cotton and retailers. Current schemes and marketing alternatives were not
designed for cooperatives like CoopNatural or equivalent small enterprises in the South covering
the whole production chain. Retailers are taking the most benefit out of the fair trade market,
which somehow contradicts the original concept of fair trade.
Finally, concerning the state of art of fair trade, lack of knowledge and a certain level of
confusion were identified at consumer’s side. The ever increasing isolated initiatives on fair trade
adding up to other concepts of sustainable trade, such as organic, ethical trade and corporate
social responsibility may be confusing for consumers. However, even more critical than a
possible misunderstanding, lack of information about fair trade was found among consumers in
The Netherlands, the country where the concept of fair trade emerged. It was also identified that
lack of knowledge about fair trade results in lack of involvement and low consumption.
19
9. Recommendations
I. Regarding the main research question:
a) To CoopNatural:
Apply for the certificate of FLO in case budget is available and a project manager is in
place;
Evaluate the possibility of certifying the whole production chain with special concern to
the groups of artisans due to their high economic vulnerability;
Search funds to finance the transition to fair trade, i.e. to cover fees and adaptation costs;
Carry out study on sustainability of the business on middle and long terms. Special
attention to availability of water and the impacts on community and ecosystems resulting
from water being used with irrigation;
Promote the concept of comércio justo (fair trade) together with FLO Brazil and stores in
order to build consumers’ awareness in Brazil and benefit from the potential of national
market;
Consider combining FLO and Kuyichi at a later stage in order to diversify the portfolio
of the cooperative as much as possible. Spilling eventual exceeding white organic cotton
over to Kuyichi should be taken as an option.
b) To fair trade organisations and ethical companies:
Adapt current schemes according to the profile of initiatives in the South like
CoopNatural in order to:
- Invert current market shares of retailers and Southern traders;
- Facilitate their access to fair trade markets. Special points of attention:
o The multitude of standards and the difficulty to understand them;
o High costs of adaptation, certification and inspections;
o Possible inadequacy with local reality.
Improve communication with consumers
- Organise public campaigns to increase level of awareness;
- Effectively communicate in cases of non-compliance with rules to avoid consumers
loosing credibility on fair trade.
20
Cooperate as to:
- Avoid double certification costs for organic and fair trade;
- Lobby for top-down governmental policies in favour of fair trade;
- Set up shared funds for Southern producers and traders willing to enter in fair trade
markets;
- Communicate with consumers efficiently. The ever increasing number of isolated
initiatives may cause more confusion than elucidation.
Develop and strengthen local partnerships that can help:
- Reducing risk of fraud. Yet special care is needed to avoid having this partners adding to
the problem instead;
- Reducing inspection costs;
- Communicating with local governments, entrepreneurs and consumers.
Develop South-South trade relations to:
- Create new fair trade markets;
- Minimize CO2 emissions.
Care for the environment
- Address environmental issues to ensure sustainability in mid and long terms, like FLO is
doing. Nonetheless this concern should not be translated in barriers for developing
countries at first stage. Requiring traders in the North to compensate CO2 emissions, for
instance, can be a fair option.
Specific recommendations:
- To FLO: Require farmers with hired labour to hire all employees and make explicit in
the list of requirements that no kind of disciplinary practice is allowed.
- To Made-By: Consider setting up offices in developing countries.
- To Kuyichi: Consider stopping dyeing organic cotton. Use naturally coloured organic
cotton instead. As last alternative, use eco-friendly dyeing.
- To H&M: If not purchasing organic textile from Brazil due to concern with textile miles,
consider compensating emissions of importing textile from other countries.
21
II. Regarding the methodology developed in this research:
Self-image of company in MCA
It is recommended to include factor “self-image of the company” as criterion in the Multi
Criteria Analysis, which has been overlooked during the development of this research. As
shown in Figure 1, trading own brand and producing for another company are two different
contexts for CoopNatural with regards to how the rest of world would see it. In the cases of
Kuyichi and H&M, the cooperative is literally “out of the picture”.
Bottle necks identified in this research
Time management is a critical factor. Since this research involves many stakeholders with
different agenda, the researcher can loose control of the flow, facing time constraints later on.
It is difficult to estimate how long time will take for obtaining data, or even to talk to the
right person in each organisation, let alone scheduling interviews with them. Therefore it is
strongly advised to take the following measures in advance, preferably during preparation
phase before the research starts:
- Define the minimum number of alternatives to be investigated;
- Contact companies and organisation related to these alternatives that have been pre-
selected to: 1) confirm assumptions made; 2) get an impression of whether they are
willing to collaborate with the research; 3) find out who are the contact people within
these organisations to be interviewed and in case of questions;
- Make appointments for interviews with all stakeholders.
22
References
Agro Fair, www.agrofair.nl/pages/view.php?page_id=10 , June 25th 2007
Almeida, A.P., 2005, “Perfil sócio-econômico de Campina Grande”, FIEP, Campina Grande
Barbier, E.B., 1999, “Development, poverty and environment”. In: Bergh, J.C.J.M. van den,
Handbook of environmental and resource economics, Edgar Elgar, Cheltenham
Beers, C. van, 2006, “International trade, the environment and sustainable development”, Delft
University of Technology, Delft
Brazilian Ministry of Development, Industry and International Trade (Desenvolvimento),
www.desenvolvimento.gov.br/sitio/secex/depPlaDesComExterior/indEstatisticas/balCom_uni
Federacao.php , June 25th 2007
BBC, “Ethanol dominating energy summit”, April 16th 2007, available at
news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/6560197.stm
Carneiro, F.G. & Arbache, J.S., 2003, “Assessing the impacts of trade on poverty and inequality”,
World Bank, Washington, DC
Cunningham, W.P., Cunningham, M.A. & Saigo, B.W., 2006, “Environmental science: a global
concern”, McGraw-Hill, New York
CoopNatural, www.naturalfashion.com.br , March 26th 2007
EMBRAPA, www.cnpa.embrapa.br/produtos/algodao , June 26th 2007
EPOPA, www.grolink.se/epopa , June 04th 2007
23
Fair Trade Original, www.fairtrade.nl , June 04th 2007
Fairtrade Labelling Organisations International (FLO), www.fairtrade.net , May 28th 2007
Fernández, C.R., 2006, “Ética y ciencia en los estudios de comercio y pobreza. Impacto en los países en
desarrollo”, Entelequia, Málaga
FLO-Cert, www.flo-cert.net , May 28th 2007
Fridell, G., 2003, “Fair trade and international moral economy: within and against the market”,
York University, York
Grijp, N. van der & Brander, L., 2004, “Multi-sector and sector specific schemes”. In: M.
Campins Eritja (ed.), Sustainability labelling and certification, Marcial Pons, Madrid
H&M,
www.hm.com/nl/corporateresponsibility/environment/rawmaterialsandfibres__envworkarticle3
.nhtml , June 11th 2007
Haynes, I., 2005, “Can organic cotton be fair? Impacts of the ‘fair’ criteria on the trade of Indian
organic cotton”, Université de Liège, Liège
Herwijnen, M. van & Jansen, R., 2004, “Software support for multicritria decision-making”. In:
Giupponi C., Jakeman T., & Kasserberg D. (eds.), Sustainable management of water resources:
an integrated approach, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Hines, C., 2003, “Time to replace globalization”, Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Massachusetts
IBD, www.ibd.com.br/Certificacao_Default.aspx?categoria=ECOSOC&ling=PORTU , June
04th 2007
24
IBGE, www.ibge.gov.br , June 25th 2007
International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM), www.ifoam.org , June 25th 2007
International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), 2005, “Environment and trade:
A handbook”, IISD, Manitoba
Institute for Applied Economic Research (IPEA), www.ipea.gov.br , June 25th 2007
Kahn, J.R., 2005, "The economic approach to environmental natural resources", South-Western,
Ohio
Kuyichi, www.kuyichi.com , May 28th 2007
Made-By, www.made-by.nl , May 28th 2007
M-Braze, www.m-brazebasics.com , June 04th 2007
Nepstad, D.C., Stickler, C.M., & Almeida, O.T., 2006, “Globalization of the Amazon soy and
beef industries opportunities for conservation”, Woods Hole Research Center, Falmouth
New Scientist, “Fashion industry needs to cotton on to green”, December 9th 2006
Observer, “Stores go to war as fairtrade booms”, February 25th 2007, available at
environment.guardian.co.uk/ethicalliving/story/0,,2020890,00.html
Organic Trade Association, www.ota.com , June 25th 2007
25
OXFAM, 2002, “Rigged rules and double standards: trade, globalisation, and the fight against
poverty”, available at
www.oxfam.org.uk/what_we_do/issues/trade/downloads/trade_report.pdf
OXFAM, 2004, “Finding the moral fiber”, available at
www.oxfam.org.uk/what_we_do/issues/trade/downloads/bp69_cotton.pdf
Page, S. & Slater, R., 2003, “Small producer participation in global food systems: policy opportunities
and constraints”, Overseas Development Institute, London
Patagonia, www.patagonia.com/web/eu/patagonia.go?assetid=2047 , June 04th 2007
Ravallion, M., 2004, “Looking beyond averages in the trade and poverty debate”, World Bank,
Washington DC
Raynolds, L.T., 2000, “Re-embedding global agriculture: the international organic and fair trade
movements”, Colorado State University, Colorado
Rodrik, D., 2002, “Globalization for whom?”, Harvard Magazine, Harvard
Roozen, N. & Hoff, F. van der, 2002, "Fair trade. Het verhaal achter Max Havelaar-koffie,
Oke-bananen en Kuyichi jeans", van Gennep, Amsterdam
Teddy Bear Films, www.teddybearfilms.com/chinablue , July 11th 2007
The Economist, “How green is your wardrobe?”, December 2nd 2006
The Guardian, “Cottoning on to a good thing”, April 13th 2007, available at
www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2007/apr/13/fairtrade.organics
26
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), 2006, “Trade and
environment review”, United Nations, Geneva
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), http://hdr.undp.org/hdr2006/statistics
, June 25th 2007
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), 1992, “Rio Declaration”, Rio de Janeiro
Winters, L.A., McCulloch, N. & McKay, A., 2002, “Trade liberalisation and poverty: The
empirical evidence”, University of Nottingham, Nottingham
World Bank, http://siteresources.worldbank.org/DATASTATISTICS/Resources/GDP.pdf ,
June 25th 2007
27
Abbreviation and acronyms
CIS: Centrum voor Internationale Samenwerking (Centre for International Cooperation), at Vrije
Universiteit, in Amsterdam, The Netherlands
CODEX: Codex Alimentarius Commission
CSR: Corporate social responsibility
FLO: Fairtrade Labelling Organisations International
EMBRAPA: Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agrária (Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation)
GDP: Gross Domestic Product
GMO: Genetic modified organisms
HDI: Human Development Indicator
IBD: Instituto Biodinâmico (Biodynamic Institute)
IFOAM: International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements
IVM: Instituut voor Milieuvraagstukken (Institute for Environmental Studies) at Vrije Universiteit, in
Amsterdam
SA8000: Social Accountability Standard SA 8000
28
Glossary of terms
CODEX: Codex Alimentarius Commission, established by Food and Agricultural Organisation
and World Health Organisation of United Nations.
Eko: Organic label granted by of Skal.
Fair Trade: Trade model that internalizes social and environmental costs. It differs from free
trade since the primary objective of the latter is the maximization of profit, while the former
focuses on social and environmental conditions under which a product is produced and traded.
FINE: Informal association of the four main Fair Trade networks (Fairtrade Labelling
Organizations International, International Fair Trade Association, Network of European World
shops and European Fair Trade Association).
Organic agriculture: “Organic agriculture is an ecological production management system that
promotes and enhances biodiversity, biological cycles and soil biological activity. It is based on
minimal use of off-farm inputs and on management practices that restore, maintain and enhance
ecological harmony”. (Organic Trade Association, 2007)
HDI: Human Development Indicator. It measures the average achievements in a country in
three basic dimensions of human development: long and healthy life, as measured by life
expectancy at birth; knowledge, as measured by the adult literacy rate; and the combined primary,
secondary and tertiary gross enrolment ratio.
Gini: “Measures the extent to which the distribution of income (or consumption) among
individuals or households within a country deviates from a perfectly equal distribution. A value of
0 represents perfect equality and a value of 100, perfect inequity” (UNDP, 2007). It was
developed by Corrado Gini.
29
GDP: Gross Domestic Product. It corresponds to the total value of services and goods produced
by a nation.
IBD: Brazilian certification body accredited by IFOAM.
Liberalization: Process enabling financial and investment markets to freely operate worldwide.
Max Havelaar: Dutch fair trade labelling and certifying scheme, operating under FLO.
Producers: Farmers or growers.
Rio Declaration: outcome of United Nations Conference on Environment and Development,
held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992.
SA8000: Social Accountability Standard SA 8000, developed by SAI (Social Accountability
International), based on ILO conventions. It was developed originally manufacturing industry,
but also applied in agriculture since 2000.
Skal: Dutch certification body accredited by IFOAM.
Solidaridad: Dutch developing organisation.
Sustainable development: “A real increase in well-being and standard of life for the average
person than can be maintained over the long-term without degrading the environment or
compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” (Cunningham et al,
2006).
Textile miles: Emissions of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) resulting from fossil fuels based
transportation of textiles, adding up greenhouse gases that cause global warming.
Traders: Sellers, buyers, transformers or manufacturers.
Annexes
2. Methodology
This Chapter explains what has been done in this research and how it was approached. Section
2.1 gives a macro overview of the research phases and section 2.2 provides detailed information
on methods used and considerations made during the whole research.
It is important to emphasize that the focus of this research has been put on CoopNatural and the
stakeholders concerned. The need for this emphasis has been identified in the beginning of this
project since fair trade is as much a new as a wide subject. Its requirements vary per product, and
per trader or certifier, so each case within fair trade has its own peculiarities. For these reasons it
would not make sense to put the cooperative in a passive position, nor to look at one single
marketing alternative even if one is more renowned than another. Therefore this research has
been developed from “core to surroundings”, starting from the needs of the CoopNatural, and
then observing other stakeholders and conceptual linkages.
2.2 Methods and considerations
2.2.1 Identification of marketing alternatives
The objective of this phase was to identify the fair trade marketing alternatives for CoopNatural
to be analysed in this research. As this research has taken place in The Netherlands, alternatives
were looked for within the Dutch market.
Fair trade “as everybody is doing it” means applying for a certificate, something that will be
added in the label or package of the product to show that it is produced under fair trade
conditions. But why is it so? Are there maybe other ways to operate as a fair trader, whether
based on certification or not?
Having these questions at the starting point of the research, it was decided to also consider as
possible alternatives the market for organic and companies with strong Corporate Social
Responsibility (CSR) policies. The reason for this is CoopNatural is already producing organic
and the standards for organic products are progressively including social requirements (details in
section 4.2). Besides this, CSR-companies are imposing strong social and environmental
ii
requirements and they represent an opportunity in the market than could not be ignored. As a
matter of fact Hema, one of the biggest retailers in The Netherlands, is on the top of Dutch
consumers’ minds (see Figure 15).
2.2.3 Data processing and analysis
Multi-criteria analysis and Definite will be method and tool applied in this research to analyse
data. Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA) is an evaluation method developed to support decision
problems like the main question of this research: “What is the best fair trade marketing
alternative for CoopNatural, taking into account environmental, social and economic impacts”. It
will be applied here to compare fair trade marketing alternatives. It analyses how each option
performs against environmental, social and economic criteria initially defined to cover the goal of
the problem. The analysis itself is performed by using Definite, a computer program. “Definite is
a decision support software package that can weigh up the alternatives and assess the most
reasonable alternative” (van Herwijnen et al, 2000).
2.2.3.1 Processing data
This section forms the basis for Chapter 6. The set of criteria for analysis is first consolidated in a
“Facts Table”, which is the input for MCA. The Facts Table of CoopNatural will be based on
three components:
a) The evaluation of CoopNatural on the requirements of each alternative. The cooperative will
attribute a level of Effort demanded in order to comply with each requirement, the Cost to adapt
to them, and the added value to the cooperative (Benefit) of each requirement once it is met.
This is in line with the objective of this research: which alternatives suits CoopNatural better, and
not the other way around. Levels of Effort and Benefits are indicated in Tables 1 and 2.
Table 1: Efforts to comply with requirements
Effort Meaning
0 No effort. CoopNatural already complies with the requirement
1 Low effort
2 Medium effort
3 High effort
4 Very high effort, nearly impossible to comply
Table 2: Benefits from complying with requirements
iii
Benefit Meaning
0 Irrelevant for the cooperative
1 Good
2 Very good
3 Excellent
b) Costs with certification and auditing fees;
c) Two complementary criteria:
- Potential increase in sales with certification or partnership and
- Duration of transition process (in months), i.e. time spent with getting the certification (in case of
FLO or Made-By) or to sign the partnership (in case of Kuyichi and Made-By).
Sales volume of t-shirts was chosen to establish a common parameter in the calculation of
increase in sales. T-shirts represented about 57% of the total volume traded by CoopNatural in
2006.
One might be tempted to multiply expected sales volume by the price of t-shirt indicated during
interviews to speculate about annual revenue. Yet this has not been done in this research to avoid
an unfounded bias.
Generating Facts Table:
Tables 6-8 were crossed with Tables 9-11, and then added with Tables 12 and 13. The result of
these operations was the Facts Table, which is available in Annex XIX. Finally it was compacted
as shown in Table 15.
2.2.3.2 Analysing data
This section forms the basis for Chapter 7. MCA has been performed in Definite in five phases:
problem definition, standardising, weighting, ranking and sensitivity analysis.
Problem definition
First alternatives, criteria and scores of the Facts Table were uploaded in Definite. Criteria were
classified as costs and benefits.
Standardising
As scores have different units (monetary, time, %, ranges), they must be standardized to a
common dimension unit before the criteria can be combined. (van Herwijnen, 2005). The
iv
method chosen is called Maximum, which scales each score between zero and the maximum
score. The method chosen for the Facts Table of CoopNatural is called Maximum, which scales
each score between zero and the maximum score.
Weighting
It is very important to determine the level of relevance among groups of criteria, and between
criteria within each group. By doing so one tells the software that economic aspects must be
taken as more important than environmental ones, for instance.
Ranking
Based on the weights and standardisation previously specified, it provides the ranking of
alternatives. The one with the highest score is the most suitable for the case.
Sensitivity analysis
Results were checked considering any level of uncertainty concerning weights and scores that
have been attributed in the Facts Table. This is done in order to validate the robustness of
results. At this stage it also checks possible reversal points. Reversal points indicate how weights
would have to change in order to have alternatives switching positions in the ranking. It is useful
to quickly evaluate under which conditions an alternative would rank first.
v
6. Requirements and costs imposed by marketing alternatives
This chapter focuses on the requirements and costs imposed by each marketing alternative. In
addition it estimates potential increase in sales and how long time the transition process would
take in each case. These factors formed the basis for the multi criteria analysis in next chapter. It
starts by presenting the requirements and commenting the critical ones. Next it shows
CoopNatural’s evaluation on these requirements in terms of effort to comply with each
requirement, benefit from complying and cost to adapt. The following section summarizes the
costs with fees and auditing. Subsequently, it provides estimations made for increase in sales and
duration of processes. Finally, it presents the Fact Table to be used in the multi criteria analysis.
6.1 Requirements
Each alternative has its own set of requirements to address three groups of issues: Social,
Economic and Environmental. Tables 6-8 compile these requirements and show by which
alternatives they are required. The complete sets of requirements can be found in Annexes X, XI
and XII, stating what CoopNatural will have to do or have in place.
FLO has minimum and progress requirements. At the moment they are elaborating a deadline
catalogue that will specify when progress requirements are supposed to be in place. Since it is not
available yet, only minimum requirements were considered in this research, plus one specific
progress requirement that has to be in place one year after certification. It should be noticed that
FLO has different sets of requirements for small farmers’ organisations (i.e. producers of cotton)
and traders (i.e. sellers, buyers, transformers or manufacturers of cotton within the production
chain).
vi
Table 6: Social requirements
FLO FLO Made-By Kuyichi H&M
1. SOCIAL Small Farmers Trader Trader Supplier Supplier
General 1.1 Fairtrade adds Development Potential X 1.2 Members are Small Producers X 1.3 Democracy, Participation and Transparency X 1.4 Non-Discrimination X X X X X
Standards on Labour Conditions 1.5 Forced Labour and Child Labour X X X X X
1.6 No disciplinary practices X X X X 1.7 Freedom of Association & Collective Bargaining X X X X X
1.8 Conditions of Employment X X X
1.9 Remuneration X X X X
1.10 Working hours X X X X 1.11 Occupational Health and Safety X X X X X 1.12 Factory and housing conditions X X
1.13 Management systems X X
vii
Table 7: Economic requirements
FLO FLO Made-By Kuyichi H&M
2. ECONOMIC Small Farmers Trader Trader Supplier Supplier
General 2.1 Fairtrade Premium X 2.2 Export Ability X
Trade
2.3.Establish business in The Netherlands X
2.4.Establish factory in (Eastern) Europe X
Trade Standards 2.5 Product Sourcing X 2.6 Procure a Long Term and Stable Relationship X 2.7 Pricing and Premium X 2.8 Pre-financing X 2.9 Information rights and obligations X
2.10 Quality X X
2.11 Certification and auditing fees
X X X X
Table 8: Environmental requirements
FLO FLO Made-By Kuyichi H&M
3. ENVIRONMENTAL Small Farmers Trader Trader Supplier Supplier
3.1 Impact Assessment, Planning and Monitoring X 3.2 Control of chemicals X X 3.3 Waste X X 3.4 Fire X 3.5 Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) X
3.6 Organic cotton X X
viii
6.2 Remarks on critical requirements
This section comments those requirements from Tables 6-8 that are critical for CoopNatural
based on its evaluation to be presented in next section. In brief, FLO covers environmental,
social and economic issues. Regarding H&M and Made-By, the latter is more complex in the
social group due to the managements systems that it requires. They are equivalent in economic
requirements, but H&M has no costs of certification. H&M demands more environment friendly
practices, although Made-By is ahead with organic cotton.
Social requirements
Members are Small Producers (requirement 1.2 in Table 6): At least 50% of the cotton must
be produced by small farmers. The definition of small farmers is based on indicators like total
cultivated area, cotton area, no contracting of permanent workers, number and tasks of
temporal workers, main income from coming from agricultural activity, producer’s
involvement in the farm work, living on or nearby the farm. Since most of the cotton of
CoopNatural nowadays is produced be a non-small farmer, i.e. a farmer with hired labour.
This emphasizes the importance of the new partnership with the group of small farmers
“Arribaçã” (see Organisation in section 4.2.2).
Democracy, Participation and Transparency (requirement 1.3 in Table 6): After one year of
certification: the participation of small farmers within the organisation of producers is
supposed to increase gradually. As most small farmers are either illiterate or low educated, this
will require some effort.
No disciplinary practices (requirement 1.6 in Table 6): No kind of disciplinary practice is
allowed. Surprisingly enough, the requirements of FLO for small farmers does not refer to it.
In any case, punishment or any kind of harassment is absolutely not practiced within
CoopNatural.
Remuneration (requirement 1.9 in Table 6): FLO and Made-By require that liveable wages are
paid. Local independent institutions check whether the local minimum salary defined law is
really enough to cover the basic needs of the employee (=food+school+health+10%). If that
is the case, the salary should be increased to the minimum level indicated by the institution.
H&M talks about minimum wages but does not go beyond the minimum wages by law as the
others do. This requirement will not impact on CoopNatural. All employees are earning at
least minimum wages defined by law which is also above liveable level.
ix
Management systems (requirement 1.13 in Table 6): Policies and systems must be in place to
ensure that the cooperative operates according to the norms (and eventually its suppliers as
well). This requirement will demand much effort from CoopNatural to have these systems in
place. It will need one extra dedicated personnel to be in charge of this.
Social Indicators: the first social impact
Social Indicator in this context is a certificate granted by a third-party auditing company proving
that the certified company complies with a set of social norms. Both FLO and Made-By require
trade companies in the production chain to present a social indicator. So in fact, except for FLO
Small Farmers and H&M, the social requirements in Table 6 are the requirements by a Social
Indicator. Made-By accepts either SA8000 or Fair Wear as social indicator. Among the social
indicators accepted by FLO, SA8000 or Model Code are applicable in the case of CoopNatural.
A copy of SA8000 and Fair Wear are available in Annex XIII. Model Code is included in FLO
requirements in Annex XII.
-Made-By requests a social indicator only to the sewing companies in the production chain.
SA8000 was considered in the calculations because Fair Wear does not operate in Brazil. FLO
requests it to each trading company in the production chain. Model Code was chosen since it is
less expensive than SA8000. Besides this, complying with the social requirements of Model Code
will be nearly as much beneficial for CoopNatural as SA8000 would be. This comparison
between Model Code and SA8000 is explained in Annex XIV.
Complying with this requirement implies in high costs for the cooperative. Although
CoopNatural would not have major difficulties to comply with the requirements, it can not
afford acquiring this certificate for each trade company within its production chain (see Figure 6).
In order to reduce most of these costs, CoopNatural will have to exclude some of its members
and third-parties from this process. This means a major social impact that will have to be
considered. According to the cooperative, operationally speaking it could operate with only 4 out
of 8 sewing companies, and without the Groups of Artisans and Other Manufacturers. This
would lead to a minimum scenario of 11 trade companies, which has been considered for the
calculation of Table 12 (section 6.4).
Economic requirements
Establish business in The Netherlands (requirement 2.3 in Table 7): As Made-By operates only
in The Netherlands (and in some northern European countries in the near future)
x
CoopNatural would have to set up either a distributor or a shop in one of these European
countries. It would demand the maximum level of effort from CoopNatural to implement it.
Establish factory in (Eastern) Europe (requirement 2.4 in Table 7): Brazil is not any of the
markets that H&M is working with. CoopNatural would have to become a European supplier
of textile. So it would have to set up a sewing factory in Europe (probably in Eastern Europe
to reduce costs). It would also demand maximum effort, and costs would be even higher than
in case of establishing business in The Netherlands required by Made-By.
Pricing and Premium (requirement 2.7 in Table 7): FLO establishes minimum price and
premium paid to seed cotton producers. The current numbers for organic cotton in Brazil are:
price (per kg) = US$ 0.58; premium (per kg) = US$ 0.06. This would not have any negative
impact on CoopNatural as it is currently paying more than minimum values defined by FLO.
Environmental requirements
Control of chemicals (requirement 3.2 in Table 8): FLO specifies norms to control the use of
agrochemicals. H&M refers to control in the rest of the production chain. FLO requirements
are not applicable to CoopNatural because they are already doing organic. H&M’s
requirements for the rest of the production chain will demand some effort from the
cooperative.
Waste (requirement 3.3 in Table 8): H&M goes beyond simple control regarding hazardous
waste. FLO is focused on organic waste. Both are not applicable for CoopNatural as it does
not produce hazardous or organic waste.
Fire (3.4): FLO allows use of fire only in case it is the best option from the ecological point of
view and in case it is not dangerous for people. It is not applicable for CoopNatural.
Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) (requirement 3.5 in Table 8): FLO does not allow
any use of GMO. It is not applicable for CoopNatural either.
Organic cotton (requirement 3.6 in Table 8): Made-By is the only one that has organic cotton
as requirement, although not as a minimum requirement. It is not compulsory at start point,
but the company would have to show the intention to convert to organic gradually.
xi
6.3 CoopNatural's evaluation on requirements
The evaluation of CoopNatural on requirements follows in Tables 10-12. Notice that yet in case
of Effort=0 the benefit was considered, as to reward previous investments of CoopNatural.
Table 9: CoopNatural’s evaluation on Social requirements
EVALUATION
SOCIAL CRITERIA Effort Cost Benefit
0 - 4 € 0 - ... 0 - 3
General 1.1 Fairtrade adds Development Potential 2 € 190 3 1.2 Members are Small Producers 1 0 1.3 Democracy, Participation and Transparency 2 € 1.900 2 1.4 Non-Discrimination 0 3
Standards on Labour Conditions 1.5 Forced Labour and Child Labour 0 2
1.6 No disciplinary practices 0 2 1.7 Freedom of Association & Collective Bargaining 0 1
1.8 Conditions of Employment 0 1
1.9 Remuneration 0 2
1.10 Working hours 0 2 1.11 Occupational Health and Safety 0 2 1.12 Factory and housing conditions 0 1
1.13 Management systems 3 € 4.560 2
Table 10: CoopNatural’s evaluation on Economic requirements
xii
EVALUATION
ECONOMIC CRITERIA Effort Cost Benefit
General 2.1 Fairtrade Premium 0 3 2.2 Export Ability 0 1
Trade
2.3.Stablish business in The Netherlands 4 € 100.000 1
2.4.Stablish factory in (Eastern) Europe 4 € 115.000 1
Trade Standards 2.5 Product Sourcing 1 € 380 1 2.6 Procure a Long Term and Stable Relationship 1 € 380 1 2.7 Pricing and Premium 0 2 2.8 Pre-financing 0 1 2.9 Information rights and obligations 0 1
2.10 Quality 1 € 3.800 3
xiii
Table 11: CoopNatural’s evaluation on Environmental requirements
EVALUATION
ENVIRONMENTAL CRITERIA Effort Cost Benefit
3.1 Impact Assessment, Planning and Monitoring 3 € 7.600 2 3.2 Control of chemicals
-Farms 0 2 -Rest of production chain 1 € 3.800 2
3.3 Waste 0 2 3.4 Fire 0 1 3.5 Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) 0 1
3.6 Organic cotton 0 3
6.4 Costs
Table 12 summarizes the total costs of fees. FLO is first divided in two columns to make a clear
distinction between the fees for Farmers and Traders. The figures are based on current fees
charged by fair trade organisations and auditing company.
xiv
Table 12: Cost of certification and auditing
Annex XVII explains how these figures were calculated.
6.5 Complementary criteria: Increase in Sales and Time
Table 13 presents the estimations for increase in sales volume and how long the transition
process would take in each alternative. Annex XVIII explains how these figures were calculated.
The increase in sales referred here are regarding sales of end products. Certifying the farmers
would not increase their revenues since the minimum amount to be paid per ton of cotton plus
the premium, both stipulated by FLO, are below what is currently being paid at CoopNatural.
FLO Farmers
FLO Traders
Made-By Kuyichi H&M
Certification and auditing (2.11) -First application fee € 250 -Initial fee 1st grade € 1.400 -Additional costs € 825 -Extra travel and accommodation costs
€ 0 -First application fee € 800 -Annual trade certification fee € 2.600 € 2.500 -Social indicator: Model Code € 8.800 -Social indicator: SA8000 € 16.720 € 16.720 -Present social indicator € 2.200 -Additional costs € 0 -Travel and accommodation costs € 2.050
€ 2.475 € 16.450 € 19.220 € 16.720 € 0
TOTAL: € 18.925 € 19.220 € 16.720 € 0
FLO Made-By Kuyichi H&M
xv
Table 13: Complementary criteria
FLO Farmers
FLO Traders
Made-By
Kuyichi
H&M
Increase in sales -Expected sales volume (t-shirts per year) 24.700 500000 50.000 300.000
-Expected increase in sales volume 30% 2632% 263% 1579%
Time invested (in months)
4,0 0,5 0,5 0,5 9,0
These data were consolidated to form the Facts Table as explained in Methodology (section
2.2.3.1). The main macro conclusion than can be extracted at this stage is that the set of
requirements for Small Farmers will have a higher impact on CoopNatural than the one for
Traders, both in terms of Benefit as in Cost and Effort, as clearly illustrated in Table 14.
Table 14: Impact of FLO requirements on CoopNatural
FLO Small Farmers FLO Traders
Total Effort 15 0
Total Benefit 34 15
Total Cost
(fees + other investments)
€ 31.925 € 16.450
6.6 Facts Tables for Multi Criteria Analysis
Table 15 is the Facts Tables, the basis of the Multi Criteria Analysis in next chapter. It should be
noticed that data regarding FLO Small Farmers and FLO Traders are now consolidated as FLO.
It summarizes total effort to comply and total benefits from complying with each group of
criteria (i.e. Economic, Social and Environmental). It also totalises costs with fees and auditing,
and other adaptation costs. Finally it includes the estimations made for increase in sales and time.
xvi
Table 15: Facts Table
CRITERIA FLO Made-By Kuyichi H&M
1 Economic 1.1 Effort to comply 2 4 1 4 1.2 Benefits from complying - Increase in sales (%) 30% 2632% 263% 1579% - Other economic benefits 10 1 3 3 1.3 Costs - Fees and auditing (€) 18.925 19.220 16.720 0 - Other investments (€) 10.450 104.560 8.360 118.800 2 Social 2.1 Effort to comply 5 3 3 0 2.2 Benefits from complying 29 16 16 15 3 Environmental 3.1 Effort to comply 5 0 0 1 3.2 Benefits from complying 10 3 3 4 4 Time duration of transition process (in months) 4,5 0,5 0,5 9,0
xvii
Ao meu pai
Não pode ter sido coencidência.
Recebi sinal verde para encarar este desafio
um dia antes de você adoecer.
Lutei pelos meus ideais,
e você bravamente por sua sobrevivência.
Encontramos ao mesmo tempo novos caminhos,
cada qual em uma nova vida!
Esta conquista eu dedico a você, meu pai
sempre tão dificil
e pra sempre tão nosso pai.