Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, University of Ljubljana, J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana,...
-
date post
18-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, University of Ljubljana, J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana,...
Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, University of Ljubljana,J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia
P. Prelovšek, M. Zemljič, I. Sega and J. Bonča
Finite-temperature dynamics of small correlated systems: anomalous properties for
cuprates
Sherbrooke, July 2005
Outline
• Numerical method: Finite temperature Lanczos method (FTLM)
and microcanonical Lanczos method for small systems:
static and dynamical quantities: advantages and limitations
• Examples of anomalous dynamical quantities (non-Fermi liquid –like)
in cuprates: calculations within the t-J model :
• Optical conductivity and resistivity: intermediate doping – linear law,
low doping – MIR peak, resistivity saturation and kink at T*
• Spin fluctuation spectra: (over)damping of the collective mode in
the normal state, ω/T scaling, NFL-FL crossover
quantum critical point, static stripes, crossover ?
Cuprates: phase diagram
t – J model
interplay : electron hopping + spin exchangesingle band model for strongly correlated electrons
projected fermionic operators: no double occupation of sites
n.n. hopping
finite-T Lanczos method
(FTLM): J.Jaklič + PP
T > Tfs
finite size temperature
n.n.n. hopping
Exact diagonalization of correlated electron systems: T>0
Basis states: system with N sites• Heisenberg model: states• t – J model: states• Hubbard model: states
• different symmetry sectors:
A) Full diagonalization: T > 0 statics and dynamics
me
memory and operations
Finite temperature Lanczos method
FTLM = Lanczos basis + random sampling: P.P., J. Jaklič (1994)
Lanczos basis
Matrix elements: exactly with M=max (k,l)
Static quantities at T > 0
High – temperature expansion – full sampling:
calculated using Lanczos: exactly for k < M, approx. for k > M
Ground state T = 0:
FTLM gives correct T=0 result
Dynamical quantities at T > 0
Short-t (high-ω), high-T expansion: full sampling
M steps started with normalized and
exact
Random sampling:random
>> 1
Finite size temperature
many body levels:
2D Heisenberg model 2D t-J model 2D t-J model: J=0.3 t
optimum doping
FTLM: advantages and limitations
• Interpolation between the HT expansion and T=0 Lanczos calculation
• No minus sign problem: can work for arbitrary electron filling and
dimension
• works best for frustrated correlated systems: optimum doping
• So far the leading method for T > 0 dynamical quantities in strong
correlation regime - competitors: QMC has minus sign + maximum
entropy problems, 1D DMRG: so far T=0 dynamics
• T > 0 calculation controlled extrapolation to g.s. T=0 result
• Easy to implement on the top of usual LM and very pedagogical
• Limitations very similar to usual T=0 LM (needs storage of Lanczos
wf. and calculation of matrix elements): small systems N < 30
many static and dynamical properties within t-J and other models calculated,
reasonable agreement with experimental results for cuprates
Microcanonical Lanczos method
Long, Prelovsek, El Shawish, Karadamoglou, Zotos (2004)
thermodynamic sum can be replaced with a single microcanonical statein a large system
MC state is generated with a modified Lanczos procedure
Advantage: no Lanczos wavefunction need to be stored, requirement as for T = 0
Example: anomalous diffusion in the integrable 1D t-V model insulating T=0 regime (anisotropic Heisenberg model)
T >> 0:huge finite-size effect (~1/L) !
convergence to normal diffusion ?
Resistivity and optical conductivity of cuprates
Takagi et al (1992) Uchida et al (1991)
ρ ~ aT
pseudogap scale T*
mid-IR peak at low doping
universal marginal FL-type conductivity
resistivitysaturation
normal FL: ρ ~ cT2 , σ(ω) Drude form
Low doping: recent results
Ando et al(01, 04)
1/mobility vs. doping
Takenaka et al (02)
Drude contribution at lower T<T*
mid – IR peak at T>T*
FTLM + boundary condition averaging
t-J model: N = 16 – 261 hole
Zemljic and Prelovsek, PRB (05)
Intermediate - optimum doping
van der Marel et al (03)
BSCCO
t-J model: ch = 3/20
ρ ~ aT
reproduceslinear law
deviation from the universal law
Origin of universality:
assuming spectral function ofthe MFL form
increasing function of ω !
Low doping
mid- IR peak for T < J: related to the onset of short-range AFM correlations
position and origin of the peak given by hole bound by a spin-string
resistivity saturation
onset of coherent ‘nodal’ transport
for T < T*N = 26, Nh = 1
Comparison with experiments
underdoped LSCO intermediate doping LSCO
Ando et al.Takagi et al.
normalized resistivity: inverse mobility
• agreement with experiments satisfactory both at low and intermediate doping
• no other degrees of freedom important for transport (coupling to phonons) ?
Cuprates – normal state: anomalous spin dynamics
LSCO: Keimer et al. 91,92Zn-substituted YBCO: Kakurai et al. 1993
Low doping:
inconsistent with normal Fermi liquid
~
normal FL: T-independent χ’’(q,ω)
Spin fluctuations - memory function approach
goal: overdamped spin fluctuations in normal state +
resonance (collective) mode in SC state
Spin susceptibility: memory function representation - Mori
‘mode frequency’ ‘spin stiffness’ – smoothly T, q-dependent at q ~ Q
fluctuation-dissipation relation
Less T dependent,saturates at low T
damping
function
large damping:
FTLM results for t-J model: N=20 sites
J=0.3 t, T=0.15 t > Tfs ~ 0.1 tNh=2, ch=0.1
Argument: decay into fermionic electron-hole excitations ~ Fermi liquid
collective AFM mode overdamped
scaling function: ω/T scaling for ω > ωFL
Zn-substituted YBCO6.5 : Kakuraidifferent energies
Normal state: ω/T scaling – T>TFL
parameter
‘normalization’ function
cuprates: low doping
Fermi scale ωFL
PRL (04)
Crossover FL: NFL – characteristic FL scale
ch < ch* ~ 0.15:
ch > ch* :
non-Fermi liquid
Fermi liquid
t-J model - FTLM N=18,20
PRB(04)
FTLMT=0 Lanczos
NFL-FL crossover
Re-analysis of NMR relaxation
spin-spin relaxation
+ INSUD
OD
Berthier et al 1996
+ CQ
from t-Jmodel
UD
OD
Balatsky, Bourges (99)
Summary
• FTLM: T>0 static and dynamical quantities in strongly correlated systems
advantages for dynamical quantities and anomalous behaviour• t – J model good model for cuprates (in the normal state)• optical conductivity and resistivity: universal law at intermediate doping,
mid-IR peak, resisitivity saturation and coherent transport for T<T* at low
doping, quantitative agreement with experiments• spin dynamics: anomalous MFL-like at low doping,
crossover to normal FL dynamics at optimum doping• small systems enough to describe dynamics in correlated systems !
AFM inverse correlationlength κ
Balatsky, Bourges (99)
κ weakly T dependent and not small even at lowdoping
κ not critical
Inelastic neutron scattering: normal + resonant peak
Bourges 99: YBCO
q - integrated
Doping dependence:
Energy scale of spin fluctuations = FL scale
characteristic energy scale of SF:
T < TFL ~ ωFL : FL behavior
T > TFL ~ ωFL: scaling
phenomenological theory:
simulates varying doping
Kondo temperature ?
Local spin dynamics
‘marginal’ spin dynamics
J.Jaklič, PP., PRL (1995)
Hubbard model: constrained path QMC