FACULTY OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
Transcript of FACULTY OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
FACULTY OF TECHNOLOG Y
FACULTY OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
Author: Supervisor1:
Thesis title:
Nature of the work2: Commissioned by:
GATEGORY EVALUATION
1. Scope of the topic narrow 1 2 3 broad3
2. Degree of difficulty (theory, abstraction) easy 1 2 3 difficult
3. Thesis structure (logical structure of the work) poor 1 2 3 4 5 good
4. Introduction of the research problem and previous research poor 1 2 3 4 5 good
5. Completion of goals poor 1 2 3 4 5 good
6. Author’s evaluation of results poor 1 2 3 4 5 good
7. Significance of results low 1 2 3 4 5 great
8. Amount of supervision required more 1 2 3 less
9. Language of the thesis (text structure, spelling) poor 1 2 3 4 5 good
10. Layout and appearance (following instructions) poor 1 2 3 good
Total points4
General evaluation:
Date: Suggested grade:
Reviewers:
Clafication of signatures:
Supervisor (at the University) Second reviewer
1 Supervisor at the University 2 Used evaluation scale: research, product development, other 3 The scale of 1 – 3 is applied to categories that are difficult to evaluate 4 Attach a summary to this evaluation. Suggested grading scale: 10 – 15 pts.sufficient (1); 16 – 21 pts. satisfactory (2); 22 – 28 pts. good (3);
29 – 35 pts. very good (4); 36 – 42 pts. excellent (5).