› sites › default › files › u1031 › nrmp-2016-program … · Introduction ...
Facts about the Match. Introduction Prior to the mid 70’s, getting into a residency was...
-
Upload
hassan-stokes -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
2
Transcript of Facts about the Match. Introduction Prior to the mid 70’s, getting into a residency was...
Facts about the Match
Introduction
Prior to the mid 70’s, getting into a residency was “crazy”
Then the NIMP became the NRMP Programs were still quite variable so
getting into the “right place” was important (but still pyramidal)
The ACGME has “leveled the field” Today the “Match” really means
finding the program that matches the applicant
Caveats
Students get information from many sources (Student Affairs, current residents, other students, parents, family doctor, etc)
Much of the information is WRONG
NRMP 2007-2009 USF Data
2007 - 2009
Characteristic 25th 50th 75th
Match Characteristics:
1. Number of matched seniors 247 312 342 442
2. Percentage of class matched 93.3 93.4 95.2 96.6
3. Mean number of programs ranked 8.0 8.3 9.2 10.0
4. Mean number of programs ranked in matched specialty
6.2 6.4 7.4 8.1
Student Characteristics:
5. Mean number of work experiences 2.2 2.4 2.6 3.0
6. Mean number of volunteer experiences 5.3 6.1 6.9 7.4
7. Mean number of research experiences 1.6 1.7 2.0 2.5
8. Mean number of publications 1.5 1.9 2.1 3.0
9. Percent AOA members 9.5 13.2 15.1 16.5
USMLE Step Scores:
10. Mean Step 1 score 207.0 219.4 223.0 237.0
11. Mean Step 2 Scores 212.0 229.0 234.9 244.0
1. Percentile Distribution for All Matched Seniors: All Specialties Combined
2007 - 2009
Characteristic 25th 50th 75th
Match Characteristics:
1. Number of matched seniors 11 17 22 24
2. Percentage of class 3.4 4.8 6.6 6.7
3. Mean number of programs ranked 5.0 5.8 6.8
4. Mean number of programs ranked in matched specialty
--Does Not Apply for Unmatched Seniors --
Student Characteristics:
5. Mean number of work experiences 2.1 2.4 2.5 2.9
6. Mean number of volunteer experiences
4.1 5.0 6.1 6.6
7. Mean number of research experiences
1.6 2.1 2.7 2.8
8. Mean number of publications 1.4 2.1 2.3 3.1
9. Percent AOA members 0.0 0.0 4.5 6.3
USMLE Step Scores:
10. Mean Step 1 score 194.0 207.0 219.1 224.0
11. Mean Step 2 scores 193.0 209.0 227.0 235.8
NRMP 2007-2009 USF Data25. Percentile Distribution for All Matched Seniors: Unmatched
ProgramP(match givenUS)
Family Medicine 0.98
Internal Medicine 0.98
Pediatrics 0.98
Neurology 0.97
Psychiatry 0.95
Anesthesiology 0.94
Emergency Medicine 0.94
Obstetrics/Gynecology 0.94
Pathology 0.94
Physical Medicine 0.94
All Programs 0.93
Radiology 0.88
General Surgery 0.88
Neurosurgery 0.82
Orthopedic Surgery 0.82
Otolaryngology 0.82
Dermatology 0.73
Plastic Surgery 0.71
Vascular Surgery (integrated) 0.67
• 111 (of 126) schools responded
• 14,623 seniors represented (NRMP = 16,070)
• 871 unmatched on Monday 3/15/10 (6.0%)
• 194 without a PGY-1 position on 3/29/10 (1.3%)
• 179 “ready to start” according to their student affairs deans (1.2%)
2010 Match-Scramble Survey
• Of those 179• 81 - not competitive for chosen field• 49 - USMLE issues• 28 - Rank order issues• 18 - Difficulty with the process• 16 - Geography• 13 - Overly Aggressive• 11 - Poor interviewing skills• 6 - Professionalism issues• 2 - Poor Letters of Recommendation• 1 - Poor advice
2010 Match-Scramble Survey
Things to consider How competitive is the student How competitive is the discipline How much help is the student going to
need, how do you help get it Alternate Plan, where indicated “What Color is Your Parachute-2010”
by Richard Bolles ($12.91 at Amazon)• Interviewing skills• Dress
Careers in Medicine (AAMC resource)
2010 NRMP Data for US Seniors
Matched US Seniors 93.3% %matched first choice 52.7% 52.7%%matched second choice 15.4% 68.1%%matched third choice 9.2% 77.3%%matched 4th choice 5.3% 82.6%%matched >4th choice 11.6% 94.2%%unmatched 5.9% 5.9%Couples match rate (N=808 couples) 93.4%
USF 2010 Class DataApplications Interviews Attended # ranked
first quartile 15 7 5 5
median 24 11 8 7
third quartile 36.5 15 11 10
Minimum 3 1 1 0
Maximum 100 51 24 24
Things to Address
Need to list at least 7 institutions that the student is willing to go to (or more)
Interviewing do’s and don’ts How to put together a match list.
Determining “risk”
Surgery example• risk of surgery is estimated by
• risk of operation x risk of patient
Match example• Risk of not matching is a combination of
• risk of “chosen field” x risk of student
Take home message• Understand how competitive your field is• Understand how competitive you are
Risk of Discipline
90+% 80-89% 70-79% 60-69% 50-59%
Anesthesiology 93% Emergency Med 88% Med Peds 77% Dermatology 69% Plastic Surgery 56%
Neurology 95% Family Med 87% Orthopedics 75%
Pathology 90% Internal Med 85% Otolaryngology 77%
Pediatrics 90% Neurosurgery 82% Radiation Onc 79%
Psychiatry 90% Obstetrics 88% Surgery 71%
Radiology Diagnostic 90% Physical Med 89%
Your Risk
Getting an interview• USMLE Step 1 Score• Rank in Class• Getting help
Getting ranked highly• AOA• “Audition Rotation” +/-• Rank in Class• Interview• Letter from someone KNOWN
Getting “GOOD” advice
Career Counselor/Master Trainers• Michael Flannery (IM)• Erika Abel (IM/Peds)• Lara Katzin (Neuro)• William Marshall (Surgery & Specialties)• Kelly O’Keefe (Emergency Medicine)• Eduardo Gonzalez (Family Medicine)
USF Faculty (sometimes wrong) Residents (often wrong, N=1) Other Students (often wrong, N=0) Family/friends (usually wrong, old)
USMLE Step 2 Exam
Required to be ranked? Delay in starting residency Score “decays” with time
Summary
Get good advice Understand the field and yourself Meet with USF Chair and/or PD Rank at least 7 programs Have a developed “Plan B” DON’T count on the scramble Take Step 2 early