Factors Influencing Farmer Decisions to Grow Poppies · Factors Influencing Farmer Decisions to...

Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment & Poppy Growers Tasmania

Factors Influencing Farmer Decisions to Grow Poppies

January 2013


i

Macquarie Franklin Administration Office 112 Wright Street | East Devonport | Tasmania | 7310

Phone: 03 6427 5300 | Fax: 03 6427 0876 | Email: [email protected] Web: www.macquariefranklin.com.au

Report author: Thom Goodwin, Lance Davey & Michael Lehman

An appropriate citation for this report is:

Macquarie Franklin, 2013, Factors Influencing Farmer Decisions to Grow Poppies in Tasmania, Devonport TAS

Document status: DRAFT

Date Status /Issue number Reviewed by Authorised by Transmission method

This report has been prepared in accordance with the scope of services described in the contract or agreement between Macquarie Franklin and the Client. Any findings, conclusions or recommendations only apply to the aforementioned circumstances and no greater reliance should be assumed or drawn by the Client. Furthermore, the report has been prepared solely for use by the Client and Macquarie Franklin accepts no responsibility for its use by other parties.


ii

Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3

2 Potential Poppy Area ...................................................................................................................... 4

3 Company interviews ....................................................................................................................... 7

4 Farm survey ..................................................................................................................................... 9

4.1 Questionnaire, survey sample and response rate .................................................................. 9

4.2 Survey Results ....................................................................................................................... 12

5 Current Poppy Grower Survey Results .......................................................................................... 15

5.1 Area of poppies grown .......................................................................................................... 15

5.2 Reasons for growing less than maximum annual poppy area .............................................. 17

5.3 Factors that would encourage farmers to grow more poppies ............................................ 19

6 Non-Poppy Grower Survey Results ............................................................................................... 21

6.1 Reasons farmers do not grow poppies ................................................................................. 21

6.2 Factors that would encourage farmers to grow more poppies ............................................ 22

7 New Irrigation Schemes ................................................................................................................ 24

Appendix A – Regional breakdown of revisions made to TIA and DPIPWE mapping ........................... 25

Appendix B – Revised Annual Potential Poppy Area ............................................................................ 26

Appendix C – Current grower survey responses ................................................................................... 27

Appendix D – Non-grower survey responses ........................................................................................ 30


1

Executive summary

The Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture (TIA) and the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment (DPIPWE) previously identified a total area of 349,000 hectares as potentially suitable for growing poppies in Tasmania. Based on this they concluded that around 60,000 hectares of poppies could be grown in Tasmania on an annual basis. This report revisits at the TIA and DPIPWE land use mapping work, and presents the results of a survey of poppy company field staff and farmers to obtain a better understanding of the factors that might limit the expansion of total poppy area in Tasmania - beyond the 30,000 hectares being grown this year.

Revised Land Use Mapping

After adjusting for a range of factors the potentially suitable poppy growing area identified by TIA/DPIPWE was revised down to 251,000 hectares – with the annual potential area revised from 65,000 hectares to around 45,000 hectares. In the current 2012-13 season around 30,000 hectares of poppies are being grown throughout the state. This represents over 60% of the 45,000 hectares of practical annual potential area identified by the revised land use mapping.

Company Interviews

Prior to undertaking farmer interviews, poppy company staff for Glaxo Smith Kline (GSK) and Tasmanian Alkaloids (TA) were interviewed to gain a better understanding of issues which they believe might limit the area of poppies grown in the state. Field officers were also asked to provide their understanding of the main reason why some previous growers no longer grew poppies. A frequent comment made by field officers was that most farmers who could potentially grow poppies had in fact grown at some point in the past. The main reasons given as to why individual farms were no longer growing poppies was the unsuitability of land in some areas, specialised dairy, specialised beef and part-time farmers not interested in cropping, as well as land used for other crops over an extended period – e.g. land leased to BRA for pyrethrum.

Farm Survey

Two farm surveys were designed - one for current poppy growers and the other for non-poppy growers (past growers & farmers who have never grown poppies). Farmers were asked to indicate what they considered to be their potential poppy ground if there were no constraints other than soil type, and what they could potentially grow on an annual basis – as well as the area devoted to other land uses during 2012-13. Non-poppy growers, and current poppy growers that were not growing at their suggested annual potential area, were asked to nominate the main reason they are not growing (more) poppies and what it would take to get them to grow (more) poppies. The survey results suggest that poppy growers are generally cropping farms, whereas non-poppy growers tend to be mainly grazing farms. A large proportion of non-poppy growers, for example,


2

have less than 20% of their total farm area under crop. On the other hand almost 80% of them have over 80% of their total area under pasture.

Current Poppy Grower Survey Results

Around 70% of current poppy growers surveyed reported growing less poppies in 2012-13 than their suggested annual potential area. Calculations based on grower estimates of their actual area versus their estimate of potential annual sustainable area suggest it may be possible to grow another 15,600 hectares on current poppy grower farms. Returns being too low and a lack of irrigation capacity accounted for over 80% of the ‘missing area’. Unsurprisingly, increased price was frequently nominated as a factor that would encourage more poppy production. However, this response needs to be seen in the context of other reported factors such as access to irrigation infrastructure, more reliability and increased yield.

Non-Poppy Grower Survey Results

92% of the 51 non-growers interviewed said they had grown poppies in the past. This is in line with the field officers suggestion that most people who could grow poppies had in fact grown at some stage. As is the case for current poppy growers, non-growers listed ‘returns too low’ as a main reason for not growing and this accounted for 35% of the ‘missing area’ on the survey farms. ‘Other enterprises’ was the second most important reason and this was generally associated with dairy farming. Higher price was listed as a major factor that would encourage non-growers to grow, followed by more reliable yield (and better yield) and prices falling for other enterprises – these are all factors associated with the relative profitability of poppies and other enterprises. Ten of the 56 growers indicated that there was nothing that would encourage them to grow poppies – these tended to be lifestyle or retired farmers. Irrigation constraints (irrigation infrastructure, water availability) did not appear to play a big role in the decision not to grow poppies among non-poppy growers.

Impact of New Irrigation Schemes

The anticipated increase in poppy area from Tasmanian Irrigation schemes could increase the current 30,000 hectares of poppies grown in Tasmania to around 36,000 hectares. The largest expansions in poppy area associated with these irrigation schemes is expected to occur in the Southern and Northern Midlands region This is 10,000 hectares short of the 46,000 hectares identified as a practical maximum annual area by the revised land use mapping – but does constitute a significant potential increase.


3

1 Introduction

The Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture (TIA) and the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water

and Environment (DPIPWE) has previously identified a total area of 349,000 hectares as potentially

suitable for growing poppies in Tasmania1. Based on this they concluded that around 60,000

hectares of poppies could be grown in Tasmania on an annual basis.

The approach used by TIA and DPIPWE was based on land capability, using 1-4 class land as well as

setting upper bounds for annual rainfall and elevation. A number of scenarios were highlighted

where the annual 60,000 hectares area could potentially increase. For instance, the report found

that raising the altitude limit from 300 m to 400 m would increase the annual area to around 65,000

hectares, mainly due to the inclusion of additional land in the Bothwell and Oatlands areas.

The desktop land capability approach taken by TIA and DPIPWE did not consider socio-economic

factors such as the value of alternative land uses and farmer attitudes to growing poppies. As such

their estimate was intended to be a theoretical annual potential area.

This report revisits the TIA and DPIPWE land use mapping work, and presents the results of a survey

of poppy company field staff and farmers to obtain a better understanding of the factors that might

limit the expansion of total poppy area in Tasmania - beyond the 30,000 hectares being grown this

year. The farmer survey included current poppy growers and farmers not currently growing poppies

(but who potentially could).

This report also provides an analysis of the additional area of poppies that might be grown on the

basis of additional irrigation water from new Tasmanian Irrigation schemes.

1 Orr, R. Simmul, P. & Webb M. 2011 Potential Land Area Suitable for Poppy Production in Tasmania


4

2 Potential Poppy Area

The Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture (TIA) and the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water

and Environment (DPIPWE) has previously identified a total area of 349,000 hectares as potentially

suitable for growing poppies in Tasmania1.

In fact, the evaluation of potential land area suitable for poppy production in Tasmania undertaken

by TIA and DPIPWE considered three main alternatives:

Map 1 –potential poppy area of 349,000 hectares and an annual sustainable area of 60,000

hectares


hectares


hectares

All three maps were limited to Class 1 to Class 4 land.

Map 1 was restricted to land with an elevation of less than or equal to 300 m.

Map 3 removed the 1,250 mm rainfall limit applied for Maps 1 & 2.

Actual poppy production in Tasmania includes significant areas of poppies grown at an elevation of

greater than 300 m, particularly around the Bothwell and Oatlands areas. There is a limited area of

poppies grown where rainfall is greater than 1,250 mm because of issues associated with planting on

time and rainfall at harvesting.

As a result, Map 2 (with a potential annual area of 65,000 hectares) was adopted as the base

situation from the TIA/DPIPWE study. While we believe that this is a reasonable theoretical potential

there are a number factors which are likely to limit the practical annual potential area.

For this report the base TIA/DPIPWE area was adjusted by deducting some further areas and by

adding some Class 5 area around Tunbridge. Annual rainfall being less than 550 mm is one of the

reasons that Tunbridge land is classified as Class 5. Clearly with irrigation this is not a limiting factor

and in fact a significant area of poppies is grown in this location.

Areas subtracted from the TIA/DPIPWE base potential area were:

Plantation on private land.

Dairy farms.

East Coast / Fingal Valley (top end) – Glaxo Smith Kline and Tas Alkaloids field officers

reported that this region frequently suffered from adverse weather events during the

harvest period.


5

East & West Tamar – the field officers reported that while the soil type might be Class 4 the

combination of soil type and weather in these regions mean that paddocks were frequently

too wet to plant poppies on time.

Parkham / Dairy Plains – the field officers reported that the combination of soil type and

weather in these regions mean that paddocks were frequently too wet to plant poppies on

time.

Redpa / Marawah – field officers reported that this region frequently suffered from adverse

weather events during the harvest period.

South of Hobart – small areas in a distant location.

While some of the excluded areas listed have grown poppies in the past and currently do have some

crops, by and large the major companies’ experience is that the areas are too unreliable or too

remote for servicing to include in a practical annual estimate.

In addition, the TIA/DPIPWE estimate allowed an 80% useable on-farm land factor to arrive at its

65,000 hectare annual potential area – this allows a 20% deduction for land use inefficiencies such

as tracks, roadways, fence-lines, waterways, water storages, random trees, hollows and rocky

patches.

In our opinion this factor is too low for areas other than the intensive cropping areas of the North

West and parts of the North East. The more extensive areas of the state tend to concentrate on

larger paddocks and exclusively use centre pivot irrigators which do not always fit the croppable

area. For these reasons regional adjustments to the useable on-farm land factor were made as

follows:

80% in the North West (unchanged)

70% in the North East

60% in the remainder of the state

After the adjustments outlined above, the 378,000 hectares potential area identified by TIA and

DPIPWE in Map 2 was reduced to a ‘practical potential area’ of 251,000 hectares – with the ‘annual

potential area’ reduced from 65,000 hectares to around 45,000 hectares.

The TIA/DPIPWE calculated their annual sustainable area of 65,000 hectares using a rotation factor

based on land classification (Table 1). The same rotation factor has been used in this project to

determine the revised annual potential area. Obviously, with a tighter rotation on land classes 3, 4

and 5 the potential annual area could be considerably expanded.

Table 1: Rotation factor associated with different land classes

Land Class Rotation

1-2 1 in 3 years

3 1 in 4 years

4 1 in 6 years

5 1 in 6 years


6

A detailed regional breakdown of the factors used to revise the TIA/DPIPWE mapping is provided in

Appendix A and a map of the revised practical potential area is provided in Appendix B.

In the current 2012-13 season around 30,000 hectares of poppies are being grown throughout the

state. This area represents over 60% of the 45,000 hectares of the practical annual potential area

identified by the revised land use mapping (Table 2).

Table 2: Potential annual poppy area and actual area of poppies grown

Total Potential

Area

Potential Annual

Area

Actual area 2012-13

ha ha ha % of annual

potential

North West 7,400 1,800 1,250 69%

Central NW 27,200 6,100 4,190 69%

Central North 35,600 6,700 3,090 46%

N. Midlands 108,900 18,600 14,400 77%

North East 25,200 4,600 1,150 25%

South 46,800 7,800 4,540 58%

TOTAL 251,100 45,600 28,620 63%


7

3 Company interviews

Prior to undertaking farmer interviews, poppy company staff for Glaxo Smith Kline (GSK) and

Tasmanian Alkaloids (TA) were interviewed to gain a better understanding of issues which they

believed might limit the area of poppies grown in the state. To some extent their responses were

used in determining the revised 45,000 hectare annual potential area outlined in Section 2.

Interviews were held with management (Rick Rockliff (TA) and Rohan Kile(GSK)) and a number of

field officers.

Prior to the field officer interviews each company provided a list of current poppy growers for the

2012-13 season, as well as comprehensive lists of farmers who that have grown poppies in the past.

A list of farmers who had never grown poppies in the past was also supplied by DPIPWE and added

to by field officers. The list from DPIPWE did not cover all regions and many of the growers on the

list were in fact found to be either current or past growers.

The list of ‘previous growers’ included a large number of people who had sold up, retired, were

deceased or were in fact growing for one of the other companies. As far as possible these lists were

‘cleaned up’ prior to the random selection of famers for interview (Section 4).

As well as discussing general factors limiting the area of poppies grown in each region the field

officers were asked to provide their understanding of the main reason individual farms on the non-

poppy grower lists no longer grew poppies. The range of factors discussed and their frequency of

occurrence are displayed in Figure 1.

A common comment was that they believed that most farmers who could potentially grow poppies

had in fact grown at some point in the past. The main reasons for no longer growing were generally

as follows:

Land not suitable – either the farmer and/or the company had decided not to continue.

Dairy farmers – with larger herds, dairy farmers have tended to become more specialised

over time and few grow poppies any more. A reduction in milk price might change this to

some extent.

Part-time farmers – not interested in cropping or may grow on an occasional basis.

Grazing – some beef/sheep farmers just not interested in cropping.

Leased to BRA – land taken out of cropping for an extended period for growing pyrethrum.


8

Figure 1: Main reasons farmers stopped growing poppies, suggested by company field officers

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Shar

e o

f n

on

po

pp

y gr

ow

ers


9

4 Farm survey

4.1 Questionnaire, survey sample and response rate Two questionnaires were developed following the company interviews and refinement of

the land use mapping:

o One was designed to collect information from farms currently growing poppies

o A further questionnaire was designed to collect information from non-poppy

growers (farmers who have grown poppies in the past and farmers who have never grown

poppies).

Survey questions asked farmers to indicate what they considered to be their potential poppy

ground if there were no constraints other than soil type, and then what they could

potentially grow on an annual basis.

Non-poppy growers, and current poppy growers who were not growing at their suggested

annual potential area, were asked to nominate the main reason they are not growing (more)

poppies and what it would take to get them to grow (more) poppies.

The survey was based on two random samples:

o A sample of current poppy growers for the 2012-13 season drawn from lists

provided by the poppy companies (GSK & TA).

o A sample of non-poppy growers drawn from comprehensive lists of farmers who

don’t currently grow poppies but have grown poppies in the past, as well as a list of

farmers who have never grown poppies, supplied by DPIPWE and added to by field

officers.

Table 3 outlines the effect of ‘cleaning up’ the non-grower list, as well as the sample size and survey

response rate for both the current poppy growers and non- growers.

Table 3: Random sampling from list ‘populations’ of current and non-growers

Current-growers Non-growers

Lists supplied by poppy companies & DPIPWE 835 1,516

After ‘clean-up & removal of duplication 835 707

Calls made from random samples 141 180

Responses 94 56

Adjustments based on responses + 6 'non-growers' - 6 still growing

- 1 non-grower + 1 'current grower'

- 1 invalid response

Total sample size 98 (17% of list) 51 (7% of list)* *Of the 180 calls made from the non-grower list: 6 were current growers; 6 were no longer farming; 1 was deceased; and

21 were wrong numbers. Based on this number of invalid non-growers and the fact that the sample was random, it is likely

that the ‘true’ list of non-growers would contain around 570 farms – suggesting a 9% sample.


10

Figure 2 and Figure 3 show the percentage of sample farms versus the total ‘population’ for both

growers and non-growers, by region. The results indicate that the farms surveyed are representative

of the underlying population lists from which the random samples were drawn.

Figure 2: Comparison of current growers surveyed with current grower list

Figure 3: Comparison of non-growers surveyed with non-grower list

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

North West Central NW CentralNorth

NorthernMidlands

North East South

Shar

e o

f fa

rms

Current grower sample Current grower list

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

North West Central NW CentralNorth

NorthernMidlands

North East South

Shar

e o

f fa

rms

Non grower Sample Non grower list


11

On an area basis the response rate of the combined poppy grower and non-poppy grower surveys

represents 15% of the 45,600 potential annual area identified by the revised land use mapping

(Table 4).

Table 4: Share of the annual potential poppy area within the survey samples, by region

Zone

Potential annual

area*

Area surveyed

ha ha %

North West 1,800 280 16%

Central NW 6,100 2,080 34%

Central North 6,700 1,090 16%

N. Midlands 18,600 2,320 12%

North East 3,900 440 11%

South 7,800 690 9%

TOTAL 44,900 6,910 15% * See Section 2


12

4.2 Survey Results

Participating farmers were asked to provide the following information for the 2012-13 season:

Total farm area.

Farmer estimate of total potential poppy land.

Farmer estimate of potential annual poppy area – with no constraints other than land

quality.

Area of poppies grown in 2012-13 (current growers only).

Area of other crops grown.

Number of other crops grown.

Area of pasture.

Table 5 and Table 6 present a summary of the survey results. Detailed survey results are contained in

Appendices C and D.

Table 5: Land use for current poppy growers

Average Minimum Maximum

(ha) (ha) (ha)

Total Farm Area 643 0 8,500

Potential Poppy Area 295 6 4,350

Annual Potential Poppy Area 59 5 500

Area of Poppies Grown in 2012-13 40 3 480

Area of Other Crops Grown 82 0 1,820

Area of Pasture 253 0 4,000

Table 6: Land use for non-poppy growers

Average Minimum Maximum

(ha) (ha) (ha)

Total Farm Area 396 6 8,000

Potential Poppy Area 115 4 900

Annual Potential Poppy Area 21 1 100

Area of Poppies Grown in 2012-13 - - -

Area of Other Crops Grown 11 0 200

Area of Pasture 329 0 8,000


13

Figure 4 and Figure 5 suggest that poppy growers are generally cropping farms, whereas non-poppy

growers are mainly grazing farms. A large proportion of non-poppy growers, for example, have less

than 20% of their total farm area under crop. On the other hand almost 80% of them have over 80%

of their total area under pasture.

Figure 4: Crop area as a share of total farm area – poppy growers versus non-growers

Figure 5: Pasture area as a share of total farm area – non-poppy growers

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

<20% 20-40% 41-60% 61-80% 81-100%

Shar

e o

f fa

rmer

s

Cropping as a share of total farm area

Poppy Growers Non poppy growers

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

<20% 20-40% 41-60% 61-80% 81-100%

Shar

e o

f fa

rmer

s

Pasture as a share of total farm area

Poppy Growers Non poppy growers


14

Figure 6 shows the average rotation assumptions underlying the farmers’ estimates of annual

potential poppy area from their total potential poppy area - compared to those used to calculate the

revised theoretical area in Section 2.

In general terms the farmer estimates are similar to those outlined in Section 2. However, for the

North East and South, rotations appear to be somewhat tighter than suggested in the calculation of

the theoretical annual potential area (land class mapping).

Figure 6: Predicted and actual average poppy rotation length, by region

1 in 0 years

1 in 1 years

1 in 2 years

1 in 3 years

1 in 4 years

1 in 5 years

1 in 6 years

1 in 7 years

North WestCentral NW CentralNorth

NorthernMidlands

North East South

Land class mapping Survey results


15

5 Current Poppy Grower Survey Results

This section summarises the survey results for the 98 current poppy growers surveyed.

Because the actual number of farms surveyed in some regions was relatively small the figures

presented are for the state as a whole rather than for individual regions. Further detail is provided in

Appendix C.

5.1 Area of poppies grown 71% of current poppy growers surveyed reported growing less poppies in 2012-13 than their

suggested annual potential area.

o This group of farmers were asked further questions about the reason for growing a

smaller area – analysis provided in Section 5.2.

12% of current poppy growers surveyed reported growing their suggested annual potential

area in 2012-13.

17% of current poppy growers surveyed reported growing more than their suggested annual

potential area.

o Overwhelmingly these growers indicated that they would not grow poppies at all for

the next several years – this is how they manage their rotation.

Figure 7: Area of poppies grown relative to farmer estimate of annual potential area – share of growers

The area of poppies grown relative to farmer estimate of annual potential area is further elaborated

in Figure 8. It shows a large proportion of farm area growing less than the maximum annual

potential, a small proportion at the maximum, and a proportion growing up to 300% of the potential

annual area – these later farms are unlikely to grow in the next few years.

< annual potential

71%

= annual potential

12%

> annual potential

17%


16

Figure 8: Area of poppy production compared to maximum annual potential on current poppy grower farms

Around 30,000 hectares of poppies are being grown in Tasmania during the 2012-13 season. Figure 9

illustrates calculations undertaken which suggest that it may be possible to grow another 15,600

hectares on current poppy grower farms – based on grower estimates of actual area versus their

estimate of potential annual sustainable area. This does not include scope for additional area on

non-poppy grower farms.

Figure 9: An estimate of additional potential poppy area on current poppy grower farms

.

0%

100%

200%

300%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Act

ual

are

a gr

ow

n a

s a

shar

e o

f m

axim

um

an

nu

al p

ote

nti

al

Area utilised by current poppy growers

Greater than maximum

Equal to maximum Less than maximum

0%

100%

200%

300%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Act

ual

are

a gr

ow

n a

s a

shar

e o

f m

axim

um

an

nu

al p

ote

nti

al

Area utilised by current poppy growers


17

5.2 Reasons for growing less than maximum annual poppy area

The 68 current poppy growers (out of 98 surveyed) who grew a smaller area of poppies than their

indicated maximum annual potential were asked to indicate the main reason they are growing less

poppies than they could (see Figure 10).

Given they were asked for the main reason only – the total number of responses is 68. ‘Returns too

low’ and lack of irrigation capacity accounted for over 80% of the ‘missing area’. The most important

reasons nominated on a per hectare basis were:

‘Returns too low’ – this is a combination of yield and price and, for the North West in

particular, returns from other competing enterprises.

‘Irrigation capacity’ – this is a combination of water supply and/or irrigation infrastructure.

For some growers this limitation might be overcome with higher returns, and may be

addressed by new Tasmanian Irrigation schemes (See Section 7).

‘Other enterprises’ – other cropping enterprises compete for potential poppy area and if

returns are higher are given a higher priority. In some cases the other enterprises have

differing rotation lengths (eg 5 years), which makes it difficult to fit the maximum poppy

area at say a 3-year rotation. Other grazing enterprises such as dairying might also grow a

small area of poppies as part of a pasture renovation phase.

‘Couldn’t get enough contract’ – only 6 growers listed this as a reason and only relates to

around 5% of the ‘missing area’. Mostly associated with suitability of land and soils being too

wet to plant on time.

‘Lifestyle’ – again only 6 growers and around 2% of the ‘missing area’.

‘Other’ – 4 growers and around 1% of the ‘missing area’.


18

Figure 10: Proportion of potential annual poppy area not used for poppies this year – main reasons for current growers.

Table 7 provides further details in relation to the ‘missing area’. Because of the sample size there are

few growers represented in some of the regions.

Interestingly, the Central NW which accounts for around 15% of the total area in 2012-13 has a

combined 18 growers listing ‘returns too low’ and ‘other enterprises’ as the main reasons. In the

Central North and Northern Midlands which are growing around half of the total crop this year, a

large number of growers (12) listed ‘irrigation capacity’ as the main reason for not growing their

maximum area.

Table 7: Main reason current poppy growers gave for growing less than their maximum poppy area - by region and number of growers

North West

Central NW

Central North

Northern Midlands

North East

South

Returns too low 1 8 2 4 3 2

Irrigation capacity 0 4 7 5 0 4

Other enterprises 0 10 2 1 0 0

Couldn't get enough contract 0 3 1 2 0 0

Lifestyle 1 2 0 2 1 0

Other 0 1 0 2 0 1

20

Gro

wer

s

20

Gro

wer

s

12

Gro

wer

s

6 G

row

ers

6 G

row

ers

4 G

row

ers

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Returnstoo low

Irrigationcapacity

Otherenterprise

Couldn'tget enough

contract

Lifestyle Other

Shar

e o

f m

axim

um

po

pp

y ar

ea n

ot

use

d t

o

gro

w p

op

pie

s


19

5.3 Factors that would encourage farmers to grow more poppies

Current poppy growers, who grew a smaller area of poppies than their maximum annual potential,

were asked to indicate what it would take to get them to grow more poppies. There was commonly

more than one reason given. The results are outlined in Figure 11 and Table 8 .

Unsurprisingly, increased price was frequently nominated as a factor that would encourage more

poppy production. However, this response needs to be seen in the context of other reported factors.

For instance, during the phone survey several farmers explained that with current price, yield, and

reliability it was often difficult to justify investing in irrigation infrastructure. So, in fact, price,

irrigation infrastructure, more reliability and yield are all related.

Figure 11: Factors that would encourage current poppy growers to grow more

Multiple responses were permitted so shares do not sum to 100% *More of better irrigation infrastructure **Access to more irrigation water ***Prices fall for other enterprise(s)

Higher price is a common factor across all regions (Table 8). Overall, irrigation infrastructure appears

to be a greater limiting factor than access to more water.

26

Gro

wer

s

19

Gro

wer

s

14

Gro

wer

s

11

Gro

wer

s

5 G

row

ers

6 G

row

ers

17

Gro

wer

s

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Higherprice

Irrigninfr.*

Morereliability

Betteryield

Morewater**

Otherprices***

Nothing

Shar

e o

f m

axim

um

po

pp

y ar

ea n

ot

use

d

to g

row

po

pp

ies


20

Table 8: Factors that would encourage current poppy growers to grow more poppies - by region and number of growers.

North West

Central NW

Central North

Northern. Midlands

North East

South

Access to more water 0 1 1 2 0 1

Irrigation infrastructure 0 5 5 3 1 5

Higher price 1 13 4 5 3 1

Better yield 0 7 1 3 0 0

More reliability 0 8 3 2 0 1

Other enterprise(s) price 0 3 1 1 1 0

Nothing 1 8 1 5 1 1


21

6 Non-Poppy Grower Survey Results

This section summarises the survey results for the 56 non- growers surveyed.

Because the actual number of farms surveyed in some regions was relatively small the figures

presented are for the state as a whole rather than for individual regions. Further detail is provided in

Appendix D.

6.1 Reasons farmers do not grow poppies Non-poppy growers were asked to indicate the main reason they are not growing the crop.

The non-grower list include farmers who have previously grown poppies as well others who had

never grown. Interestingly 92% of the 51 non-growers interviewed had in fact grown in the past. This

supports company field officer indications that most farmers in Tasmania who could grow poppies

have grown the crop at some stage.

So, apart from the possibility (probability) that the non-grower list is incomplete, additional area is

unlikely to come from attracting completely new growers. Rather it will come from increasing the

area on current farms and possibly enticing past growers ‘back to the fold’.

As is the case for current poppy growers, non-growers listed ‘returns too low’ as a main reason for

not growing and this accounted for 35% of the ‘missing area’ on the survey farms (Figure 12). ‘Other

enterprises’ was the second most important reason and this was generally associated with dairy

farming.

Farmers nominating lifestyle as a reason for not growing poppies were often older farmers who

previously ran cropping enterprises. These farmers had semi-retired, still owned their farm, but

found grazing enterprises easier to manage. The majority of these farmers were not interested in

cropping (even at higher prices).


22

Figure 12: Proportion of potential annual poppy area not used for poppies – main reasons for non-growers.

6.2 Factors that would encourage farmers to grow more poppies As a follow up to the reasons they were not growing poppies, non-growers were asked to indicate

what it would take to get them to grow the crop. The results are shown in Figure 11. It should be

noted that many respondents indicated more than one factor so proportions add to greater than

100%.

As is the case for current poppy growers, higher price was listed as a major factor that would

encourage non-poppy growers to grow the crop, followed by more reliable yield (and better yield)

and prices falling for other enterprises – these are all factors associated with the relative profitability

of poppies and other enterprises.

Ten of the 56 growers indicated that there was nothing that would encourage them to grow poppies

– these tended to be lifestyle or retired farmers.

Irrigation constraints (irrigation infrastructure, water availability) do not appear to play a big role in

the decision not to grow poppies among non-poppy growers.

16

Far

mer

s

15

Far

mer

s

11

Far

mer

s

6 F

arm

ers

3 F

arm

ers

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

Returns toolow

Otherenterprises

Lifestyle Couldn't geta contract

Irrigationcapacity

Shar

e o

f m

axim

um

po

pp

y ar

ea n

ot

use

d

to g

row

po

pp

ies


23

Figure 13: Factors that would encourage non-poppy growers to grow poppies

Multiple responses were permitted so shares do not sum to 100% *More of better irrigation infrastructure **Access to more irrigation water ***Prices fall for other enterprise(s)

30

Far

mer

s

14

Far

mer

s

7 F

arm

ers

10

Far

mer

s

7 F

arm

ers

2 F

arm

ers

3 F

arm

ers

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Higherprice

Morereliability

Otherprices***

Nothing Irrigninfr.*

Betteryield

Morewater**

Shar

e o

f m

axim

um

po

pp

y ar

ea n

ot

use

d

to g

row

po

pp

ies


24

7 New Irrigation Schemes

Tasmanian Irrigation (TI) is in the process of greatly expanding irrigation potential throughout the

state. This is in addition to the recently completed Meander Scheme and its associated pipelines,

which is yet to reach its full potential.

Surveys undertaken as part of the socioeconomic assessment for these schemes suggest that

prospective irrigators combined are planning to grow an additional 6,445 hectares (Table 9). The

largest expansions in poppy area associated with these irrigation schemes are expected to occur in

the Southern and Northern Midlands regions.

The anticipated increase in poppy area from these schemes would increase the current 30,000

hectares of poppies grown in Tasmania to around 36,000 hectares. This is 10,000 hectares short of

the 46,000 hectares identified as a practical maximum annual area by the revised land use mapping

in Section 2 – but does constitute a significant potential increase.

Table 9: Planned increases in poppy area associated with new irrigation schemes

Additional irrigation area Poppies (ha) Other land uses (ha)

North West 490 2,920

Meander Valley 650 5,270

Central North 155 1,550

North East 940 4,075

Northern Midlands 1,450 4,075

Southern Midlands 2,510 4,385

South East 250 1,345

Total 6,445 23,620

Source: Macquarie Franklin analysis of Tasmanian Irrigation Socioeconomic Assessments.


25

Appendix A – Regional breakdown of revisions made to TIA and DPIPWE mapping

Region Theoretical Potential

Poppy Area*

Adjustments

Less Dairy Less Private Plantations

Less Unsuitable

Area

Add Midlands Class 5

Less Unusable Farm Area

Revised Potential

Poppy Area

Practical Annual

Potential

North West 20,600 -6,500 -1,000 -3,900 0 -1,800 7,400 1,800

Central NW 39,400 -2,100 -3,200 -100 0 -6,800 27,200 6,100

Central North 83,600 -3,500 -4,000 -16,700 0 -23,800 35,600 6,700

N. Midlands 177,700 -700 -1,700 -15,900 22,200 -72,700 108,900 18,600

North East 58,600 -4,900 -3,500 -14,200 0 -10,800 25,200 4,600

South 91,400 -800 -800 -22,400 10,600 -31,200 46,800 7,800

TOTAL 471,300 -18,500 -14,200 -73,200 32,800 -147,100 251,100 45,600 *Map 2 as reported in: Orr, R. Simmul, P. & Webb M. 2011 Potential Land Area Suitable for Poppy Production in Tasmania Unsuitable areas include: East & West Tamar; Parkham / Dairy Plains; Redpa / Marawah; and South of Hobart. For a detailed explanation see Section 6. Unsuitable farm area factor: 20% North West and Central Northwest; 30% North East; and 40% all other regions.


27

Appendix C – Current grower survey responses

Sample Size & Location

Number of growers on list

Regional share

Sample size

Regional share 6% 9%

845

3% 40% 16% 26%

10%

41 290 150 227 54 83

39 16 25 6 9

5% 34% 18% 27% 6%

State North West Central NW Central N N Midlands North East South

98 3

Average (SD) Average (SD) Average (SD) Average (SD) Average (SD) Average (SD) Average (SD)

Farm area Total farm area 737 (1,372) 260 (244) 227 (429) 368 (324) 1,297 (2,210) 334 (221) 1,458 (1,960)

Potential poppy area

Owned land capable of growing poppies 291 (498) 205 (172) 120 (168) 234 (223) 536 (888) 141 (126) 292 (227)

Leased land capable of growing poppies 41 (211) 0 (0) 57 (320) 3 (13) 18 (46) 100 (245) 0 (0)

Total potential poppy area 328 (530) 205 (172) 175 (343) 237 (224) 554 (886) 241 (330) 258 (181)

Maximum annual poppy area 64 (85) 46 (39) 43 (84) 49 (37) 91 (114) 55 (76) 69 (65)

Farm program this year

Poppies this year 44 (67) 33 (26) 23 (30) 36 (30) 72 (117) 34 (43) 40 (36)

Other crops 94 (211) 37 (38) 83 (288) 86 (92) 108 (195) 77 (98) 18 (31)

How many crops? 3 (18) 2 (2) 3 (2) 3 (3) 3 (2) 2 (1) 1 (1)

Pasture area 279 (575) 169 (193) 84 (155) 191 (202) 588 (1,033) 173 (168) 246 (285)

Is the area of poppies less than the Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

maximum that could be grown? 70% 67% 72% 75% 64% 67% 78%

Number (SD) Average (SD) Average (SD) Average (SD) Average (SD) Average (SD) Average (SD)

Maximum area less area this year 19 (45) 13 (16) 20 (56) 13 (23) 19 (40) 21 (34) 29 (53)

SouthState North West Central NW Central N N Midlands North East


28

What is the main reason you are growing less poppies than you could?

Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %

(1) Irrigation capacity 20 20% 0 0% 4 14% 7 58% 5 31% 0 0% 4 57%

Lack of water 8 40% 0 0% 4 57% 3 60% 1 25%

Lack of irrigation infrastructure 9 45% 1 25% 3 43% 2 40% 3 75%

Type of irrigation infrastructure 5 25% 2 50% 2 29% 1 20% 0 0%

Other 1 5% 1 25% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%


(2) Returns too low 20 20% 1 50% 8 29% 2 17% 4 25% 3 75% 2 29%

Price too low 6 30% 0 0% 2 25% 0 0% 1 25% 2 67% 1 50%

Yields too low in this area 1 5% 0 0% 0 0% 1 50% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Too risky 8 40% 0 0% 3 38% 2 100% 2 50% 0 0% 1 50%

Not profitable enough 10 50% 1 100% 4 50% 0 0% 3 75% 1 33% 1 50%

Other 1 5% 0 0% 1 13% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%


(3) Suitable land occupied by other enterprises 13 13% 0 0% 10 36% 2 17% 1 6% 0 0% 0 0%

Other annual crops 10 77% 8 80% 1 50% 1 100%

Pyrethrum 1 8% 1 10% 0 0% 0 0%

Dairy 2 15% 1 10% 1 50% 0 0%

Beef/Sheep 6 46% 5 50% 1 50% 0 0%

Perennial horticulture 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%


(4) Couldn't get enough contract 7 7% 0 0% 3 11% 1 8% 2 13% 0 0% 0 0%

Didn't get in early enough 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Rotation 4 57% 3 100% 0 0% 1 50%

Other 3 43% 0 0% 1 100% 1 50%


(5) Lifestyle 6 6% 1 50% 2 7% 0 0% 2 13% 1 25% 0 0%

Not interested in cropping 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Semi-retired 3 50% 1 100% 1 50% 1 50% 0 0%

Land leased out 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Other 3 50% 0 0% 1 50% 1 50% 1 100%


(6) Other 4 4% 0 0% 1 4% 0 0% 2 13% 0 0% 1 14%



29

What would it take to get you to grow more poppies?


Access to more irrigation water 5 7% 0 0% 1 4% 1 8% 2 13% 0 0% 1 14%

More/better irrigation infrastructure 19 28% 0 0% 5 18% 5 42% 3 19% 1 25% 5 71%

Higher price 27 39% 1 50% 13 46% 4 33% 5 31% 3 75% 1 14%

Better yield 11 16% 0 0% 7 25% 1 8% 3 19% 0 0% 0 0%

More reliability 12 17% 0 0% 8 29% 3 25% 2 13% 0 0% 1 14%

Prices fall for other enterprise(s) 6 9% 0 0% 3 11% 1 8% 1 6% 1 25% 0 0%

Nothing 15 22% 1 50% 8 29% 1 8% 5 31% 1 25% 1 14%



30

Appendix D – Non-grower survey responses

Sample Size & Location

Number of growers on list

Regional share

Sample size

Regional share 12%12% 41% 18% 6% 12%

8% 16%

51 6 21 9 3 6 6

278 94 91 60 112

10% 39% 13% 13%


707 72

Average (SD) Average (SD) Average (SD) Average (SD) Average (SD) Average (SD) Average (SD)

Farm area Total farm area 396 (1,149) 151 (105) 148 (144) 344 (346) 2,683 (4,605) 299 (268) 543 (919)

Potential poppy area

Potential poppy area 115 (148) 110 (75) 86 (102) 239 (278) 68 (80) 89 (56) 84 (84)

Maximum annual poppy area 21 (20) 24 (17) 20 (22) 34 (24) 13 (11) 18 (12) 12 (10)

Farm program this year

Crops 11 (31) 0 (1) 8 (17) 29 (66) 5 (8) 5 (6) 14 (11)

How many other crops? 1 (1) 0 (0) 0 (1) 1 (1) 1 (2) 1 (1) 2 (1)

Pasture 329 (1,109) 133 (94) 139 (147) 293 (251) 2,678 (4,609) 247 (175) 155 (138)

Total 345 (1,132) 100 (100) 141 (148) 322 (294) 2,683 (4,605) 254 (173) 143 (150)

Have you grown poppies in the past? 92% 67% 95% 100% 100% 83% 100%



31

What is the main reason you are not growing poppies this year?


(1) Irrigation capacity 3 7% 1 17% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 17% 1 17%

Lack of water 2 67% 1 100% 1 100% 0 0%

Lack of irrigation infrastructure 2 67% 0 0% 1 100% 1 100%

Type of irrigation infrastructure 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Other 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

(2) Returns too low 16 36% 3 50% 5 24% 4 44% 1 33% 2 33% 1 17%

Price too low 6 38% 3 100% 2 40% 1 25% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Yields too low in this area 3 19% 0 0% 2 40% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 100%

Too risky 9 56% 1 33% 1 20% 3 75% 1 100% 2 100% 1 100%

Not profitable enough 4 25% 1 33% 1 20% 1 25% 0 0% 1 50% 0 0%

Other 1 6% 0 0% 1 20% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

(3) Suitable land occupied by other enterprises 15 33% 1 17% 7 33% 3 33% 0 0% 1 17% 3 50%

Other annual crops 1 7% 0 0% 1 14% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Pyrethrum 1 7% 0 0% 1 14% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Dairy 7 47% 1 100% 3 43% 2 67% 1 100% 0 0%

Beef/Sheep 2 13% 0 0% 1 14% 0 0% 0 0% 1 33%

Perennial horticulture 2 13% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 67%

Other 2 13% 0 0% 1 14% 1 33% 0 0% 0 0%

(4) Couldn't get a contract 6 13% 0 0% 2 10% 1 11% 2 67% 0 0% 1 17%

Companies not interested in this area 2 33% 0 1 50% 0 0% 1 50% 0 0%

Didn't get in early enough 1 17% 0 0 0% 0 0% 1 50% 0 0%

Rotation 2 33% 0 1 50% 0 0% 0 0% 1 100%

Other 1 0 0 1 0 0

(5) Lifestyle 11 24% 1 17% 7 33% 1 11% 0 0% 2 33% 0 0%

Not interested in cropping 6 55% 1 100% 2 29% 1 100% 2 100% 0

Semi-retired 6 55% 0 0% 4 57% 1 100% 1 50% 0

Land leased out 3 27% 0 0% 2 29% 0 0% 1 50% 0

Other 1 9% 0 0% 1 14% 0 0% 0 0% 0


Factors Influencing Farmer Decisions to Grow Poppies · Factors Influencing Farmer Decisions to...

Documents

Transcript of Factors Influencing Farmer Decisions to Grow Poppies · Factors Influencing Farmer Decisions to...