Eye Witness Report on Benghazi

download Eye Witness Report on Benghazi

of 4

Transcript of Eye Witness Report on Benghazi

  • 7/31/2019 Eye Witness Report on Benghazi

    1/4

    National/World

    Libyan witnesses recount organized Benghazi

    attack

    Saturday, October 27, 2012

    TRIPOLI, Libya -- It began around nightfall on Sept. 11 with around 150 bearded gunmen, somewearing the Afghan-style tunics favored by Islamic militants, sealing off the streets leading to

    the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi. They set up roadblocks with pick-up trucks mounted with heavy

    machine guns, according to witnesses.

    The trucks bore the logo of Ansar al-Shariah, a powerful local group of Islamist militants who

    worked with the municipal government to manage security in Benghazi, the main city in easternLibya and birthplace of the uprising last year that ousted Moammar Gadhafi after a 42-year

    dictatorship.

    There was no sign of a spontaneous protest against an American-made movie denigrating Islam's

    Prophet Muhammad. But a lawyer passing by the scene said he saw the militants gathering

    around 20 youths from nearby to chant against the film. Within an hour or so, the assault began,guns blazing as the militants blasted into the compound.

    One of the consulate's private Libyan guards said masked militants grabbed him and beat him,one of them calling him "an infidel protecting infidels who insulted the prophet."

    http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/explore?section=ktrk/news/national_worldhttp://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/explore?section=ktrk/news/national_worldhttp://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/explore?section=ktrk/news/national_worldhttp://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/rsshttp://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/explore?section=ktrk/news/national_worldhttp://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/explore?section=ktrk/news/national_world
  • 7/31/2019 Eye Witness Report on Benghazi

    2/4

    The witness accounts gathered by The Associated Press give a from-the-ground perspective for

    the sharply partisan debate in the U.S. over the attack that left U.S. ambassador Chris Stevensand three other Americans dead. They corroborate the conclusion largely reached by American

    officials that it was a planned militant assault. But they also suggest the militants may have used

    the film controversy as a cover for the attack.

    The ambiguity has helped fuel the election-time bickering in the United States ever since.

    The Obama administration has sent out muddled messages whether it was a planned attack or a

    mob protest that got out of control. A day after the attack, President Barack Obama referred to

    "acts of terror." He told CBS' "60 Minutes" in an interview aired the following Sunday that hebelieved those involved "were looking to target Americans from the start."

    Within 24 hours of the attack, both the embassy in Tripoli and the CIA station chief sent word toWashington that it was a planned militant attack. Still, days later, the U.S. ambassador to the

    U.N., Susan Rice, said the attack began as a spontaneous protest over the film.

    Republicans, embroiled in a heated presidential campaign, seized on the confusion. They have

    accused the Obama administration of being hesitant to call it a "terrorist attack" linked to al-

    Qaida because that would weaken one of Obama's key campaign selling points -- that under hiswatch, al-Qaida had been weakened and Osama bin Laden had been killed.

    As that debate roiled, the actual events -- and their meaning -- became somewhat skewed in themouths of politicians. One assumption often made in the back-and-forth is that if the attack was

    planned, then it must have been linked to al-Qaida.

    Ansar al-Shariah, the group whose members are suspected in the attack, is made up of militants

    with an al-Qaida-like ideology, but it is not clear whether it has any true ties to the terrororganization. Made up mainly of veterans of last year's civil war, it is one of the many powerful,heavily armed militias that operate freely in Libya and in Benghazi, while government control

    remains weak. Some Benghazi officials have praised Ansar al-Shariah for helping keep order in

    the city, even as they note its jihadi ideology.

    With its arsenal of weapons, the group is capable of carrying out such an attack on the consulate

    on its own and even on relatively short notice. Islamist militias in Benghazi had in previousmonths threatened to attack the compound.

    U.S. officials say they are still investigating whether there is an al-Qaida connection. They say

    members of Ansar al-Shariah called members of al-Qaida's branch in North Africa outside ofLibya and boasted of the attack. The administration has even said it is prepared to carry out

    drone strikes against the branch, known as al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb, or AQIM, if a link is

    proven. But the officials also acknowledge the calls alone do not yet prove AQIM was involved.

    A day after the Benghazi attack, an unidentified Ansar al-Shariah spokesman said the militia wasnot involved "as an organization" -- leaving open the possibility members were involved. He

  • 7/31/2019 Eye Witness Report on Benghazi

    3/4

    praised the attack as a popular "uprising" sparked by the anti-Islam film, further propagating the

    image of a mob attack against the consulate.

    So far, the attackers' motives can only be speculated at.

    Yasser el-Sirri, a former Egyptian militant who runs the Islamic Observation Center in Londonclosely tracking jihadi groups, said the attack "had nothing to do with the film but it was a

    coincidence that served the (militants') purpose."

    He believes the ambassador was the target and the attackers may have been inspired by an al-Qaida call to avenge the death of a top Libyan jihadist on the anniversary of the 9/11 attacks on

    the United States in 2001. But he offered no firm evidence that was the motive.

    The news trickled out slowly the night of the attack, with initial reports overshadowed by the

    storming of the U.S. Embassy in Cairo by protesters angry over the film. It was only the next

    morning that Stevens' death was confirmed.

    On the day of the attack and the next day, The Associated Press referred to it as a mob attack,

    based on Libyan officials' comment that there was a significant unarmed protest at the time. In

    reporting the following days, AP referred to it as an "armed attack" and detailed its organizednature.

    The past week, the AP has gathered accounts from five witnesses, including one of the embassy

    guards and several people living next door to the consulate compound who were present when

    the militants first moved in. Most spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisals fortalking about the attack.

    The neighbors all described the militants setting up checkpoints around the compound at about 8p.m. The State Department's timeline says the attack itself began at around 9:40 p.m.

    Khaled al-Haddar, a lawyer who passed by the scene as he headed to his nearby home, said hesaw the fighters gathering a few youths from among passers-by and urged them to chant against

    the film.

    "I am certain they had planned to do something like this, I don't know if it was hours or days, but

    it was definitely planned," said al-Haddar. "From the way they set up the checkpoints and

    gathered people, it was very professional."

    The guard said he saw no protesters. He heard a few shouts of "God is great," then a barrage ofautomatic weapons fire and rocket-propelled grenades began, along with barrages from heavy

    machine guns mounted on trucks.

    The attackers set fire to the main consulate building. Stevens and another staffer, caught insideamid the confusion, died of smoke inhalation.

  • 7/31/2019 Eye Witness Report on Benghazi

    4/4

    The attack came from the front and the side. A neighbor whose house is on side of the consulate

    compound said militants with their faces wrapped in scarves attacking.

    Because of the checkpoints, "it felt like our neighborhood was occupied, no one could get out or

    in," he said.

    The effectiveness of the roadblocks was later revealed in the State Department's account of the

    evacuation. It described how the rescue force came under heavy fire and grenade attacks as theytried to leave the consulate area.

    They evacuated staffers to a security compound across town, where they continued to come

    under fire. A precision mortar hit the compound's building at 4 a.m., killing two other

    Americans.

    (Copyright 2012 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)