EY Q1 2013 Financial Reporting Update
description
Transcript of EY Q1 2013 Financial Reporting Update
The Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update
Co-sponsored with Financial Executives International 20 March 2013
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 2 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
Disclaimer
► This presentation is ©2013 Ernst & Young LLP. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be
reproduced, transmitted or otherwise distributed in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical,
including by photocopying, facsimile transmission, recording, rekeying or using any information storage
and retrieval system, without written permission from Ernst & Young LLP. Any reproduction,
transmission or distribution of this form or any of the material herein is prohibited and is in violation of
US and international law. Ernst & Young and its member firms expressly disclaim any liability in
connection with use of this presentation or its contents by any third party.
► The views expressed by panelists in this webcast are not necessarily those of Ernst & Young LLP.
► These materials contain summary information for general guidance only. Neither Ernst & Young LLP
nor any other member firm of the global Ernst & Young organization accepts any responsibility for loss
suffered by any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any information contained herein.
On any specific matter, appropriate advisors should be consulted.
Ernst & Young
Assurance | Tax | Transactions | Advisory
About Ernst & Young
Ernst & Young is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services. Worldwide, our 167,000
people are united by our shared values and an unwavering commitment to quality. We make a difference by
helping our people, our clients and our wider communities achieve their potential.
Ernst & Young refers to the global organization of member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of
which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not
provide services to clients. For more information about our organization, please visit www.ey.com. Ernst &
Young LLP is a member firm serving clients in the US.
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 3 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
Circular 230 disclaimer
► Any US tax advice contained herein was not
intended or written to be used, and cannot be used,
for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be
imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or
applicable state or local tax law provisions.
► These slides are for educational purposes only and
are not intended, and should not be relied upon, as
accounting advice.
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 4 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
Today’s moderator
Danita Ostling Ernst & Young LLP
Partner, Professional Practice Director
Ernst & Young organization
Americas IFRS Leader
Join today's Twitter discussion: #EY_Q1Update
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 5 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
Today’s agenda
► Q1 matters to consider
► Convergence projects update
► Future considerations
Join today's Twitter discussion: #EY_Q1Update
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 6 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
Today’s presenters
Rachel Eckstein Ernst & Young LLP
Partner
Professional Practice
Lisa Kennedy Ernst & Young LLP
Partner
Professional Practice
Robert Wadley Ernst & Young LLP
Partner
Professional Practice
The information in this presentation is a summary. Viewers should consult their
own professional advisors to address their individual circumstances and concerns.
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 7 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
Today’s agenda
► Q1 matters to consider
► Convergence projects update
► Future considerations
Join today's Twitter discussion: #EY_Q1Update
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 8 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
Reporting amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income ► ASU 2013-02 issued in February 2013
► Requires more disclosures about changes in accumulated
other comprehensive income (AOCI)
► Reclassifications from AOCI
► Other current period other comprehensive income
► Requires reporting significant items reclassified out of
AOCI by component in one place
► Components include currency translation and unrealized
gains on available-for-sale securities, etc.
Effective dates for calendar year-ends
Transition method Public Private Early adoption?
Prospective 1Q 2013 YE 2014 Yes
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 9 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
Reporting amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income
Identify the effect of
reclassifications on
respective line items in the
statement where net income
is presented by component
► On the face of the financial
statements (if criteria are
met) OR
► In the notes
Cross reference to other
disclosures that provide
additional information
about the effect of the
reclassification
Significant items that are not
reclassified directly to net
income in their entirety
Significant items reclassified
to net income in their entirety
Items reclassified out of AOCI
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 10 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
Reporting amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income
Details about AOCI
components
Amount reclassified
from AOCI1
Affected line item in the statement where
net income is presented
Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities
$ 126,000 Realized gain on sale of securities
Insignificant items (1,000)
125,000 Total before tax
(43,750) Tax expense
$ 81,250 Net of tax3
Amortization of defined benefit pension items
Prior service costs $ (10,000) 2
Transition obligation (25,000) 2
Actuarial (losses) (15,000) 2
(50,000) Total before tax
17,500 Tax benefit
$ (33,500) Net of tax3
1
Amounts in parentheses indicate debits in profit/loss 2 These AOCI components are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost.
(See Note X) 3 Amount agrees with amount reported as reclassifications from AOCI in the disclosure
about changes in AOCI balances
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 11 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
Opinion check
Where do you plan to present significant
amounts reclassified out of accumulated
other comprehensive income when adopting
ASU 2013-02:
A. On the face of the income statement
B. In the notes
C. Undecided
D. Does not apply (Ernst & Young, faculty,
alumni, other)
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 12 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
Accounting standards effective for 2013 For calendar year-end companies
Accounting standards update
Public
companies
Private
companies
ASU 2013-03 — Clarifying the Scope and
Applicability of a Particular Disclosure to
Nonpublic Entities
Not applicable 4
ASU 2013-02 — Reporting of Amounts
Reclassified out of Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income
4 2014
ASU 2013-01 — Clarifying the Scope of
Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and
Liabilities and ASU 2011-11— Disclosures about
Offsetting Assets and Liabilities
4 4
ASU 2012-07 — Accounting for Fair Value
Information That Arises after the Measurement
Date and Its Inclusion in the Impairment Analysis
of Unamortized Film Costs
2012
4
4= Effective for 2013
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 13 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
Accounting standards effective for 2013 For calendar year-end companies (continued)
Accounting standards update
Public
companies
Private
companies
ASU 2012-06 — Subsequent Accounting for an
Indemnification Asset Recognized at the Acquisition
Date as a Result of a Government-Assisted
Acquisition of a Financial Institution
4
2014
ASU 2012-04 — Technical Corrections and
Improvements
4
2014
ASU 2012-02 — Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible
Assets for Impairment
4
4
ASU 2012-01 — Continuing Care Retirement
Communities — Refundable Advance Fees 4 2014
ASU 2011-10 — Derecognition of in Substance
Real Estate — a Scope Clarification
4
4
4= Effective for 2013
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 14 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
Proxy update Reminders for this proxy season
► Disclose whether use of compensation consultants raised
conflicts of interest
► Describe conflict and explain how it is being addressed
► Applies to compensation consultants engaged by
management or the compensation committee
► No definition of ―conflict of interest‖
► Smaller reporting companies now required to hold ―say-
on-pay‖ shareholder votes on executive compensation
► Report shareholder vote results on Form 8-K within
four days
► Disclose how frequently say-on-pay votes will occur in
an amendment to the initial Form 8-K within 150 days
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 15 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
Proxy update Trends in shareholder proposals
Topics of shareholder proposals in 2013 (through 15 March 2013)
% put to
vote
in proxy
%
voter
support
(% from 2012 votes
per SEC filings)
Environmental/social ► Disclose political spending and
lobbying activities
► Enhance sustainability reporting
57%
33%
22%
29%
Board of directors ► Hold annual elections of all directors
► Appoint independent director as chair
48%
73%
81%
37%
Compensation-related ► Eliminate accelerated vesting of equity
awards, payments grossed-up for taxes
43%
36%
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 16 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
Estimated annual effective tax rate (EAETR) General reminders
► Make the best estimate of the annual effective tax rate
for the full fiscal year at the end of each interim period
► Use estimated annual effective tax rate to record tax on
a current year-to-date basis
► Project year-end temporary differences and
valuation allowance
► Changes in enacted tax legislation can affect EAETR
► 2 January 2013 – Retroactive reinstatement of the tax
extenders (they’re set to expire again on
31 December 2013)
► Recognized in the interim period of enactment (Q1 2013
for companies with calendar year-ends)
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 17 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
Estimated annual effective tax rate Interim period events
► Changes to indefinite reinvestment assertion
► Record in the interim period the change in assertion occurs
► Record tax effects related to undistributed earnings of prior
years – discrete
► Record tax effects related to current year undistributed
earnings – adjust EAETR
► Discontinued operations
► Revise EAETR applied to income from continuing
operations in current and subsequent interim periods of
current fiscal year
► Recast income taxes related to prior interim periods (as
applicable) between continuing and discontinued operations
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 18 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
Opinion check
Which of the following events is likely to most
significantly affect your EAETR for 2013?
A. American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012
B. Acquisitions (e.g., change in indefinite
reinvestment assertion)
C. Divestitures (e.g., discontinued operations)
D. Other or not sure
E. Does not apply (Ernst & Young, faculty,
alumni, other)
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 19 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
Today’s agenda
► Q1 matters to consider
► Convergence projects update
► Future considerations
Join today's Twitter discussion: #EY_Q1Update
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 20 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
Convergence projects update
Current stage Q2 2013
Financial Instruments
Classification and
measurement
FASB Exposure Draft Comment letter deadline
IASB Exposure Draft
(limited amendments) Deliberate comments
Impairment FASB Exposure Draft Comment letter deadline
IASB Exposure Draft Comment letter period
Hedging
FASB On hold
IASB Review draft (except macro hedging)
Final Standard (except macro hedging to be
included in discussion paper)
Leases FASB Drafting Exposure Draft Exposure Draft
IASB Drafting Exposure Draft Exposure Draft
Revenue recognition FASB Drafting Final Standard Final Standard
IASB Drafting Final Standard Final Standard
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 21 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
Financial instruments project Classification and measurement
► Financial assets classified and
measured in one of three categories
based on:
► Instrument’s cash flow characteristics
► Entity’s business model for
managing the instrument
► Equity instruments measured at
fair value through net income (NI)
► Exception: nonmarketable
equity securities measured at
―modified‖ cost
► Reclassifications permitted only
upon a change in business model
Proposed classification and
measurement model
Amortized cost Solely principal
and interest Hold to collect
Fair value – OCI Solely principal
and interest Hold to collect and sell
Fair value – NI Residual category
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 22 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
Financial instruments project Classification and measurement
► Financial liabilities would generally be classified and
subsequently measured at amortized cost
► Limit on the use of the fair value option
► Changes in instrument-specific credit risk (i.e., own credit)
for financial liabilities measured at FV-NI would be
presented separately in OCI
► Public companies would parenthetically present fair value
for most instruments at amortized cost
► Comments on the proposal are due 15 May 2013
Thought Center Webcast on 21 March 2013 at 1 p.m. Eastern
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 23 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
Financial instruments project Credit losses (impairment)
► Applies to all financial assets that are debt instruments
measured at amortized cost or fair value through other
comprehensive income
► Examples: loans, debt securities, trade receivables
► Expected credit losses would be defined as the
contractual cash flows an entity does not expect to collect
► An estimate of expected credit losses includes:
Time value of money
At least two possible outcomes, one of which reflects a credit loss
Information about past
events
Information about current
conditions
Reasonable and
supportable forecasts
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 24 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
Financial instruments project Credit losses (impairment)
► Receivables
► Historical loss rates for aging buckets may need to be
adjusted for economic forecasts
► Allowances would be required for all receivables, including
those (1) classified as current and (2) from significant
customers that have always paid
► Debt securities
► ―Most likely‖ approach prohibited for estimating credit losses
► Record allowance instead of adjusting cost basis
► Stop accruing interest when collection of substantially all of
principal and interest is no longer probable
Comments are due 30 April 2013
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 25 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
Revenue recognition project Status
► All major topics have been redeliberated as of February
meeting; open items include:
► Sweep issues
► Consequential amendments
► Analysis of cost versus benefit
► Final drafting to begin
► Plan to issue final standard in summer 2013
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 26 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
Revenue recognition project Recent decisions
Variable
consideration
Contract
costs
Nonfinancial
assets
Eliminated
specific
guidance for
sales-based
royalties on
licensed
intellectual
property
Reaffirmed
decision to
require
capitalization
of direct,
incremental,
recoverable
costs to
acquire a
long-term
contract
Reaffirmed
decision to
apply control
and
measurement
requirements
to transfers of
nonfinancial
assets
Licenses
Decided to
treat licenses
as either
―rights‖
transferred at
a point in time
or promises to
provide
―access‖ over
time
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 27 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
Revenue recognition project Disclosures
► Disaggregation of revenue
► Contract assets, liabilities and costs
► Narrative disclosures rather than tabular reconciliations
as previously proposed
► Key judgments related to variable consideration
► Remaining performance obligations (backlog)
► Interim financial statements – many of the annual
disclosures also will be required
► IASB plans to specifically require only disaggregated
revenue at interim periods
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 28 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
Revenue recognition project Transition and effective date
► Transition choice
► Full retrospective
► Modified retrospective approach
► Modified retrospective approach
► Prior year amounts not restated
► New guidance applied to new and existing contracts as of
effective date with a cumulative catch-up adjustment
► Disclose current-year amounts as if they were prepared
under previous revenue guidance
Tentatively effective for annual periods beginning on or
after 1 January 2017
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 29 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
Opinion check
Which transition approach is your company
most likely to use:
A. Fully retrospective
B. Modified retrospective
C. Undecided
D. Does not apply (Ernst & Young, faculty,
alumni, other)
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 30 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
Today’s agenda
► Q1 matters to consider
► Convergence projects update
► Future considerations
Join today's Twitter discussion: #EY_Q1Update
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 31 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
Private Company Council activities Private company decision-making framework
► Removed presumption
that industry-specific
guidance is relevant
► Clarified that ―all or
nothing approach‖
would not be required
for exceptions or
modifications
► Clarified ―red flag‖
approach for disclosures
► Exposure draft expected
soon, framework to be
finalized later this year
► Consider exceptions
and modifications to
US GAAP
► Continue work on a
single definition of a
nonpublic entity
(private company)
Next steps Changes to Staff
recommendations
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 32 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
Private Company Council activities Topics of focus
► Recognizing and
measuring identifiable
intangible assets acquired
in business combinations
at fair value
► Consolidation of variable
interest entities
► Accounting for ―plain
vanilla‖ interest-rate swaps
with single counterparties
► Stock-based compensation
► Development-stage
enterprises
► Accounting for interest-rate
swaps with multiple
counterparties
The PCC decided not to
pursue accounting for
uncertain tax positions
Research initiatives Initial agenda
Changes to
US GAAP
Final FASB
endorsement Redeliberations
Exposure
draft
FASB
endorsement Deliberations
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 33 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
Other standard-setting activities
Active projects Current stage
Investment companies ► Final standard expected Q1
Consolidation ► Final standard expected Q2
Liquidation basis of
accounting ► Final standard expected Q1
Repurchase agreements
and similar transactions ► Exposure draft issued Q1
Discontinued operations ► Exposure draft expected Q1
Going concern ► Exposure draft expected Q2
Disclosure framework ► FASB is evaluating next steps
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 34 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
EITF update
No. Issue addressed Status
11-A Release of cumulative translation adjustment when a parent no longer
controls a consolidated foreign entity
Final ASU
2013-05
12-B Personnel services received from an affiliate of a not-for-profit entity
for which the affiliate does not seek compensation
Final
consensus
12-D Recognition, measurement, and disclosure of obligations resulting
from joint and several liability arrangements
Final ASU
2013-04
12-F Application of pushdown accounting in certain circumstances Discussions
12-G Accounting for the excess in the fair value of assets over liabilities of a
consolidated collateralized financing entity
Final
consensus
12-H Accounting for service concession arrangements Discussions
13-A Inclusion of the federal funds effective swap rate as a benchmark
interest rate for hedge accounting purposes
Proposed
ASU
13-B Accounting for investments in affordable housing tax credits Consensus-
for-exposure
13-C Presentation of a liability for an unrecognized tax benefit when a net
operating loss or tax credit carryforward exists
Proposed
ASU
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 35 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
Transactions involving an investment in a foreign entity
Sale of an ownership interest in a consolidated foreign entity
Loss of control Release all of CTA
Retained control Do not release CTA
(treat as equity transaction)
Sale of an ownership interest in a foreign entity
that is an equity method investment
Release pro-rata portion of
CTA
Step acquisition (gaining control) Release all of CTA
EITF update – Accounting for cumulative translation adjustments (CTA)
Transactions within a foreign entity
Substantial liquidation?
Sale of a subsidiary that is a nonprofit
activity or a business
No Do not release CTA
Yes Release all of CTA
Sale of a group of assets that is a
nonprofit activity or a business No
Yes
Do not release CTA
Release all of CTA
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 36 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
EITF update – Inclusion of the fed funds effective swap rate as a benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting
► Would apply
prospectively to
qualifying new or
redesignated hedging
relationships entered
into on or after adoption
► Would not alleviate
ineffectiveness for
existing hedges
Comments due 22 April 2013
Allowed benchmark
interest rates in the US for
hedge accounting
► Interest rates on direct
Treasury obligations of the
US government
►London Interbank Offered
Rates (LIBOR)
Federal funds effective swap rate
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 37 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
SEC update Current activities
► SEC Advisory Committee on Small and Emerging
Companies recommendations to the SEC:
► Increase smaller reporting companies (SRC) definition
to increase to $250M float from $75M
► Expand reporting relief for SRCs
► Permit increased ―tick size‖ for smaller listed companies
► Encourage creation of new equity market
► Statement to Congress to exempt SRCs from conflict
minerals disclosure requirements
► NASDAQ proposed rule requiring listed companies
to have internal audit function
Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update Page 38 © 2013 Ernst & Young LLP
SEC update Other SEC rulemaking
Topic Current status
Conflict minerals
(Dodd-Frank)
► Final rule issued August 2012
► Effective 2013 – First Form SD
due 2 June 2014
► Current legal challenge
General solicitation and
advertising rule (JOBS Act)
► Proposed rule – August 2012
► Awaiting final rule
―Bad actor‖ rule
(Dodd-Frank)
► Proposed rule – May 2011
► Awaiting final rule
Review of Regulation S-K
disclosures for emerging
growth companies
(JOBS Act)
► Report to Congress pending
AccountingLink What you need to know.
When you need to know it.
Because change is constant in the financial
reporting world, you need the latest
information, analysis and insight, first.
Register free at:
www.ey.com/us/accountinglink
The Ernst & Young Q1 2013 financial reporting update
Co-sponsored with Financial Executives International
Thanks for participating!