Extension Policy Statements on Public Issues Education Strengthening the Role of the University L....
-
Upload
cuthbert-parrish -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
1
Transcript of Extension Policy Statements on Public Issues Education Strengthening the Role of the University L....
Extension Policy Statements on Public Issues Education
Strengthening the Role of the University
L. Steven Smutko
North Carolina State University
Introduction
Creating “Strengthening the Role of the University”, an easy-to-read guide for developing official policy statements on Public Issues Education
Intent is to increase the capacity of land-grant universities to educate citizens on pressing and emerging public issues.
Introduction
A product of the NPPEC Public Issues Education Subcommittee
Part of a set of materials for in-service training in Public Issues Education
Introduction
Follows work of Phil Favero and Kay Haaland in a 2000 report titled, Statements Concerning public Issues Education: A Summary and Analysis of State Extension Policies and Ideas
Introduction
Reviewed statements and guidelines published by land grant institutions including those from Idaho, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, and Washington.
Pulls good ideas from each Provides commentary to guide
land-grant PIE programs in developing their own statements
Need for PIE Policy Statements
While many educators are commonly involved in public issues education, the land-grant institution has much greater potential to be effective in this arena. To realize this potential, universities need to formalize PIE networks and practices.
Need for PIE Policy Statements
The network should work to maximize benefits and minimize risks of doing PIE by overcoming organizational barriers, providing training, and helping educators decide which role to play and at what level of intensity.
(A Shared Agenda for Public Issues Education, Cornell University, 1999)
Objectives of PIE Policy Statements
Promote quality extension programming Establish a rationale for the land-grant
university’s engagement in public issues Clarify the roles of
Extension, research, teaching faculty Administration The public
Clarify organizational support for faculty who are involved in potentially contentious public policy issues
Who Should Craft a Policy Statement?
Campus faculty Off-campus faculty University administrators Legal counsel
Policy Statement Content --Definitions Define what is meant by Public Issues
Education Provide definitions of specific terms
where needed
Policy Statement Content --Statement of Principles A clear statement of principles that
specify the responsibilities, standards, and norms that underlie the professional activities of public issues educators and the institutions for which they work.
“…Extension needs to be viewed by the public as fair, balanced and inclusive.” (Ohio State University Extension)
“PIE… assumes that…individuals are the most appropriate judge of their interests. (U. of Idaho Cooperative Extension Service)
Policy Statement Content --Applicability Identify the stakeholders covered by the
statement Campus faculty (research, extension,
teaching) Off campus faculty Professional staff Graduate students Administration The public
Identify the colleges /schools / programs covered by the statement
Policy Statement Content --Separability Policy guidelines should not conflict with
other university policies or state and federal laws
“Appropriate guidelines concerning general educational and research activities are contained in disciplinary practices, the WSU faculty manual, and relevant sections of state and federal law” (WSU Canons of Practice)
Policy Statement Content --Roles An important distinction of PIE is the
observance of appropriate roles that participants in the education process can and should play Extension educators Researchers Administrators The public
A policy statement should reflect this distinction
Policy Statement Content --Roles Define the role of the public issues
educator “…we should raise the important questions
that citizens must ponder… We should provide, in an understandable form, summaries of the best science available… We can serve as facilitators of public policy education and discussion.” (New Mexico State U. Cooperative Extension)
Separate content roles from process roles
Policy Statement Content --Guidelines Focus on best practices, i.e.,
professional conduct Educators will serve as advocates for the
principles that underlie public issues education and not demonstrate bias toward a particular point of view (Univ. of Idaho)
Educators who take on the role of facilitator or mediator will need to gain the agreement of all participants to the operating principles of the process (WSU Canons of Practice)
Policy Statement Content --Guidelines Clearly define the conditions when public
issues education is appropriate, and when other educational methods are warranted instead (WSU Canons of Practice):
Issue affects the larger community Diverse and multiple stakeholders are
involved Roles clearly defined and communicated A shared information base has been provided Ground rules have been established
Policy Statement Content --Organizational Support Based on adherence to the parameters that
define a “good” PIE program. Organization will publicly support the right and
responsibility of faculty to perform public issues education (from WSU Canons of Practice):
Administrators inform employees about concerns and consult them about resolution
Employees to be provided with relevant information in a timely manner
Administrators will provide written notification of the complaint and keep employees informed
Administrators will act to assure that responses are not biased towards particular constituents
Policy Statement Content --Enhancing Capacity Organizational support can be more
than a “downstream” approach Statement of support for increasing the
capacity of extension educators for doing PIE In-service training Study leave Personnel exchanges Etc…
Policy Statement Content --Evaluation Methods Accountability in maintaining the
standards set forth in the policy statement
Specify evaluation criteria for PIE programs (see Favaro and Haaland)
Number & diversity of participants Range of policy options discussed
From Paper to Practice
Signed and adopted by college and university administrators As Extension broadens university-wide, broaden
your administrative stakeholders Circulate among all faculty and administrators
New faculty orientation Include in all PIE in-service training materials Review and reaffirm as administrators change
Review and update periodically Update as new situations arise and the system
adapts to meet new challenges in public issues education