Exported on: 03/05/2009 13:44 CST by: Simmons, James

8/14/2019 Exported on: 03/05/2009 13:44 CST by: Simmons, James

1/62

ANO Jan-09

Exported on: 03/05/2009 13:44 CSTBy: Simmons, James


2/62

Table of ContentsPage

ANO Unit-1 Jan-09 1

ANO Unit-2 Jan-09 2

ANO Unit-1 Jan-09 3

ANO Unit-2 Jan-09 4

ANO Unit-2 Jan-09 5

ANO Unit-1 Jan-09 6

ANO Unit-2 Jan-09 7

ANO Unit-1 Jan-09 8

ANO Unit-2 Jan-09 9

ANO Unit-1 Jan-09 10





ANO Unit-2 Jan-09 15ANO Unit-1 Jan-09 16





ANO Jan-09 21

ANO Jan-09 23

ANO Jan-09 24

ANO Jan-09 25

ANO Jan-09 26



ANO Unit-2 Jan-09 31ANO Unit-1 Jan-09 32















ANO Jan-09 47

ANO Jan-09 48

ANO Jan-09 49

ANO Jan-09 50

ANO Jan-09 51

ANO Jan-09 52

ANO Jan-09 53

ANO Jan-09 54

ANO Jan-09 55

ANO Jan-09 56

ANO Jan-09 57

ANO Jan-09 58


3/62

ANO Jan-09 59


4/62

ANO Unit-1

PI TitleINPO Index

Month/YearJan-09

StatusRed

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 Dec-- AFW/RHR 10 10

-- Capability Factor 12.77 12.64

-- Chemistry 5 5

-- CRE 5.96 5.94

-- EDG 10 10

-- Est. Fuel Defects 2 2

-- Forced Loss Rate 15 15

-- Fuel Reliability 8 8

-- HPSI 10 10

-- Unplanned Scrams

Rate

10 10

-- TISA 5 5

INPO Index 93.72 93.58

YTD Goal 96

EOY Estimate 93.9

EOY Goal 96

This performance indicator has a value of 0 to 100 and is calculated from a weighted combination of ten overall WANO performanceindicator values and INPO specified date periods.

Green >= 96White >= 94Red < 94

ata Source OwnerBrad Berryman

AnalyzerSteve Coffman

Year2009est Test2

1 of 59


5/62

ANO Unit-2

PI TitleINPO Index

Month/YearJan-09

StatusGreen

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 Dec-- AFW/RHR 10 10

-- Capability Factor 15 15

-- Chemistry 5 5

-- CRE 10 10

-- EDG 10 10

-- Est. Fuel Defects 0 0

-- Forced Loss Rate 15 15

-- Fuel Reliability 8 8

-- HPSI 10 10

-- TISA 5 5

-- Unplanned ScramsRate

10 10

INPO Index 90 98

YTD Goal 96

EOY Estimate 98

EOY Goal 96

This performance indicator has a value of 0 to 100 and is calculated from a weighted combination of ten overall WANO performanceindicator values and INPO specified date periods.

Green >= 96White >= 94Red < 94



Year2009est Test2

2 of 59


6/62

ANO Unit-1

PI TitleCapability Factor

Top Decile Top Quartile Month/YearJan-09

StatusGreen

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecCapability Factor- YTDTarget

85.48 96.00 96.00 96.00 96.00 96.00 96.00 96.00 96.00 96.00 96.00 96.00 96.

Capability Factor -Month

43.55 98.14 74.24

Capability Factor YTD 85.29 98.14 86.80

Cycle Average 90.21 90.10 88.74

EOY Projections 85.50 96.00

EOY Goal 96.00 96.00 96.00 96.00 96.00 96.00 96.00 96.00 96.00 96.00 96.00

Projections 88.20 96.00

The ratio of available energy over a given period to reference energy generation over the same period, expressed as a percentage. Bothenergy generation terms are determined relative to reference ambient conditions. Available energy generation is the energy that couldhave been produced under reference conditions considering only limitations within control of plant management. Reference energygeneration is the energy that could be produced if the unit operated continuously at full power under reference ambient conditionsthroughout the period. Reference ambient conditions are environmental conditions representative of the annual mean ambient conditiofor the unit.

For a non-outage year, Target is 96. Red = Target.Target for outage year based on duration. 96 * (outage days - 365) / 365.

Electrical Production

OwnerRandall Walters


3 of 59


7/62

ANO Unit-2

PI TitleCapability Factor


StatusRed

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecCapability Factor- YTDTarget

89.42 96.00

Capability Factor -Month

100.00 87.44 94.18

Capability Factor YTD 92.17 87.44 90.64

Cycle Average 94.45 94.06 93.73

EOY Projections 92.17

The ratio of available energy over a given period to reference energy generation over the same period, expressed as a percentage. Both

energy generation terms are determined relative to reference ambient conditions. Available energy generation is the energy that couldhave been produced under reference conditions considering only limitations within control of plant management. Reference energygeneration is the energy that could be produced if the unit operated continuously at full power under reference ambient conditionsthroughout the period. Reference ambient conditions are environmental conditions representative of the annual mean ambient conditiofor the unit.

For a non-outage year, Target is 96. Red = Target.Target for outage year based on duration. 96 * (outage days - 365) / 365.

Electrical ProductionOwnerRandall Walters


4 of 59


8/62

ANO Unit-2

PI TitleForced Loss Rate


StatusGreen

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecFLR Month 0.00 0.16 5.82

FLR YTD 0.42 0.16 3.04

YTD Target 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.7

EOY Proj 0.42 0.50 0.50

Unplanned Losses -Month

0 1067 39607

Planned Energy Losses-Month

0 93481 0

Unplanned Outage Ext 0 0 0

Cycle Average 0.31 0.30 0.62

Operating period forced loss rate (FLR) is defined as the ratio of all operating period unplanned energy losses during a given period of timconsidering only the operating period, to the reference energy generation minus energy losses corresponding to planned outages and thpossible unplanned extensions, during the same period, expressed as a percentage.Operating period unplanned forced energy loss during the operating period is energy that was not produced during that period becauseunplanned shutdowns or unplanned load reductions due to causes under plant management control when the unit is considered to be athe disposal of the grid dispatcher. Causes of energy losses are considered to be unplanned if they are not scheduled at least four weekadvance

Green


9/62

ANO Unit-1

PI TitleForced Loss Rate


StatusGreen

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecFLR Month 23.16 0.00 25.67

FLR YTD 1.49 0.00 12.30

YTD Target 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.7

EOY Proj 1.49 0.24 1.97

Unplanned Losses -Month

106942 20 145604

Planned Energy Losses-Month

229186 11645 672

Unplanned Outage Ext 18773 1 0

Cycle Average 0.95 0.95 2.39

Projections 0.12 0.12 8.00

Operating period forced loss rate (FLR) is defined as the ratio of all operating period unplanned energy losses during a given period of timconsidering only the operating period, to the reference energy generation minus energy losses corresponding to planned outages and thpossible unplanned extensions, during the same period, expressed as a percentage.Operating period unplanned forced energy loss during the operating period is energy that was not produced during that period becauseunplanned shutdowns or unplanned load reductions due to causes under plant management control when the unit is considered to be athe disposal of the grid dispatcher. Causes of energy losses are considered to be unplanned if they are not scheduled at least four weekadvance

Green


10/62

ANO Unit-2

PI TitleUnplanned Automatic Scrams


StatusGreen

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecNumber Scrams -Month

0 0

Hours Critical inmonth

744.00 708.10

Unplanned AutoScram Rate -Month

0.0 0.0

Unplanned AutoScram Rate -YTD

0.000 0.000

Unplanned AutoScram Rate -2-yrRolling

0.000 0.000

Unplanned AutoScram YTD Goal

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Unplanned AutoScrams-YTD

0 0

The number of unplanned automatic scrams normalized to 7,000 hours of critical operation.

Goals are based on goals set for year to date performance. Green: No unplanned automatic scrams, Red >= 1.

ata Source OwnerRandall Walte


7 of 59


11/62

ANO Unit-1

PI TitleUnplanned Automatic Scrams


StatusGreen

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecNumber Scrams -Month

0 0

Hours Critical inmonth

402.42 744.00

Unplanned AutoScram Rate -Month

0.0 0.0

Unplanned AutoScram Rate -YTD

0.000 0.000

Unplanned AutoScram Rate -2-yrRolling

0.000 0.000

Unplanned AutoScram YTD Goal

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Unplanned AutoScrams-YTD

0 0

The number of unplanned automatic scrams normalized to 7,000 hours of critical operation.

Goals are based on goals set for year to date performance. Green: No unplanned automatic scrams, Red >= 1.

ata Source OwnerRandall Walters


8 of 59


12/62

ANO Unit-2

PI TitleHigh Pressure SystemUnavailability (%)


StatusGreen

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecUnavail Planned hrs -Mo

0 0

Unavail Unplanned hrs-Mo

0 0

Fault Exposure hrs -Mo 0 0

Total Unavail hrs -Mo 0 0

Monthly Goal (%) 0 0

% Unavailability Mo 0 0

% Unavailability YTD 0 0

EOY Estimate 0 0YTD Goal 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Projections 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Uavail 3-Yr Rolling % 0 0

The ratio of the hours that the components were unable to perform their intended function to the hours the system was required to beavailable for service. Expressed as a percentage.

GOALS: Max-Target-Min (0.75 - 1.0 - 2.0)Use 2% which is full credit for INPO IndexGreen


13/62

ANO Unit-1

PI TitleHigh Pressure SystemUnavailability (%)


StatusGreen

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecUnavail Planned hrs -Mo

0 0

Unavail Unplanned hrs-Mo

0 0

Fault Exposure hrs -Mo 0 0

Total Unavail hrs -Mo 0 0

Monthly Goal (%) 0 0

% Unavailability Mo 0 0

% Unavailability YTD 0 0

EOY Estimate 0.11 0YTD Goal 1 0

Projections 0

Uavail 3-Yr Rolling % 0 0

The ratio of the hours that the components were unable to perform their intended function to the hours the system was required to beavailable for service. Expressed as a percentage.

GOALS: Max-Target-Min (0.75 - 1.0 - 2.0)Use 2% which is full credit for INPO IndexGreen


14/62

O Unit-2

PI TitleAux Feedwater/RHR Unavailability (%)


StatusGreen

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DFW / RHR Plannedvailable Hrs -Mo

0 0

planned Unavailable Hrs - 0 0

t exposure Hrs -Mo 0 0

al Unavailable Hrs -Mo 0 0

vailability - Monthly Goal 0 0

FW / RHR %vailability -Month

0 0

FW / RHR %vailability -YTD %

0 0

Y Estimate 0.44 0l YTD % 1 1

ections 0

r Rolling Avg 0 0

e ratio of the hours that the components were unable to perform their intended function to the hours the system was required to be available for servicpressed as a percentage.

ALS: Max-Target-Min (0.75 - 1.0 - 2.0)een


15/62

O Unit-1

PI TitleAux Feedwater/RHR Unavailability (%)


StatusGreen

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DFW / RHR Plannedvailable Hrs -Mo

37.63 0

planned Unavailable Hrs - 0 0

t exposure Hrs -Mo 0 0

al Unavailable Hrs -Mo 37.63 0

vailability - Monthly Goal 5 0

FW / RHR %vailability -Month

0 0

FW / RHR %vailability -YTD %

0 0

Y Estimate 0.7 0l YTD % 1 1

ections 0.4 0

r Rolling Avg 0 0

e ratio of the hours that the components were unable to perform their intended function to the hours the system was required to be available for servicpressed as a percentage.

ALS: Max-Target-Min (0.75 - 1.0 - 2.0)een


16/62


17/62


18/62

ANO Unit-2

PI TitleFuel Reliability Indicator


StatusGreen

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecFRI - Month 3.1E-4 4.3E-4

FRI Quarterly Average- INPO

2.1E-4 3.2E-4

FRI Goal 5.0E-4 5.0E-4 5.0E-4 5.0E-4 5.0E-4 5.0E-4 5.0E-4 5.0E-4 5.0E-4 5.0E-4 5.0E-4 5.0E-4 5.0

Measure of nuclear fuel pin integrity. Derived from steady state offgas activity at SJAE for noble gas fission products corrected for recoirelease and normalized to average linear heat generation rate.

Green 300

Data Source

OwnerPatrick Williams

AnalyzerAndrew Tate

Year2009

15 of 59


19/62

ANO Unit-1

PI TitleFuel Reliability Indicator


StatusGreen

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecFRI - Month 1.0E-6 1.0E-6

FRI Quarterly Average- INPO

1.2E-4 1.0E-6

FRI Goal 5.0E-4 5.0E-4 5.0E-4 5.0E-4 5.0E-4 5.0E-4 5.0E-4 5.0E-4 5.0E-4 5.0E-4 5.0E-4 5.0E-4 5.0

Measure of nuclear fuel pin integrity. Derived from steady state offgas activity at SJAE for noble gas fission products corrected for recoirelease and normalized to average linear heat generation rate.

Green 300

Data Source

OwnerPatrick Williams

AnalyzerAndrew Tate

Year2009

16 of 59


20/62

ANO Unit-1

PI TitleCollective Radiation Exposure

Top Decile39

Top Quartile49

Month/YearJan-09

StatusGreen

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecMonthly Goal 2 0.4 0.247 0.499 0.766 0.206 0.191 0.277 0.367 0.123 0.262 0.21 0.1

Monthly RadExposure

18.934 0.34 0.396

YTD Goal 89.1 0.4 0.647 1.146 1.912 2.118 2.309 2.586 2.953 3.076 3.338 3.548 3.7

Collective RadExposure -YTD

123.971 0.34 0.736

EOY Estimate 123.97 3.5 3.8

Annual CollectiveDose - Cycle Value

84.265 84.333 83.934

The sum of the total effective does equivalent (TEDE) received by all personnel including contractors and visitors on site. TEDE is the sumthe deep dose equivalent (DDE) and committed effective dose equivalent (CEDE). TEDE, DDE, and CEDE are defined in 10 CFR 20.1003.

Green:100% AND 110% of station YTD goal

RP Records

OwnerDavid Moore

AnalyzerTim Smith

UnitCode

17 of 59


21/62


22/62

ANO Unit-2

PI TitleChemistry Effectiveness Indicator

Top Decile2.170

Top Quartile3.590

Month/YearJan-09

StatusGreen

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecGoal 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 1

Cycle CEI Projection 5.03 5.03 5.03 5.03 5.03 5.03 5.03 3.22 3.22 3.2

Cond 1 AL Chemistry 0.0047 0.0047 0.0047

Cond 2 FW Fe/Cu 0.0596 0.4650 0.4795

Cond 3 H2 and Mitg 1.3773 1.3773 2.0463

Cond 4 Leak-cond 1.4625 1.7105 2.4963

Cond 5 Cobalt 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Monthly Change to CEI 0.00 0.66 1.47

Monthly CEI 16 2 5

Cycle CEI 2.90 3.56 5.03

An index which uses data elements that collect information on several key primary and secondary chemistry parameters. The data iscollected based mostly on time outside limits along with the maximum value of the parameter during the month. Note: CEI monthly datamust be reported for a station when operated above 10% power for a BWR and 30% power for a PWR anytime during the month (even iless than a full day). Chemistry Effectiveness Indicator (CEI) results will be averaged (with a scaling factor applied) to obtain a reportedrolling cycle results (18 or 24 month cycle)which is used in calculating the INPO Index starting 2008. The monthly change in CEI is therelative change in CEI from the previous month. No points are received if the index is greater than or equal to 35 and full five points arewhen the index is less than or equal to 10. Index = (35-CEI) x 4

Green


23/62

ANO Unit-1

PI TitleChemistry Effectiveness Indicator

Top Decile2.170

Top Quartile3.590

Month/YearJan-09

StatusWhite

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecGoal 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 1

Cycle CEI Projection 2.40 8.66 8.66 8.66 8.66 8.66 6.38 6.38 6.38 6.38 6.3

Cond 1 AL Chemistry 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Cond 2 FW Fe/Cu 0.5491 2.7456 2.9634

Cond 3 H2 and Mitg 0.1713 0.6054 0.8824

Cond 4 Leak-cond 0.7184 4.6012 4.8187

Cond 5 Cobalt 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Monthly Change to CEI 3.72 2.22 0.71

Monthly CEI 16 8 2

Cycle CEI 7.19 7.95 8.66

An index which uses data elements that collect information on several key primary and secondary chemistry parameters. The data iscollected based mostly on time outside limits along with the maximum value of the parameter during the month. Note: CEI monthly datamust be reported for a station when operated above 10% power for a BWR and 30% power for a PWR anytime during the month (even iless than a full day). Chemistry Effectiveness Indicator (CEI) results will be averaged (with a scaling factor applied) to obtain a reportedrolling cycle results (18 or 24 month cycle)which is used in calculating the INPO Index starting 2008. The monthly change in CEI is therelative change in CEI from the previous month. No points are received if the index is greater than or equal to 35 and full five points arewhen the index is less than or equal to 10. Index = (35-CEI) x 4

Green


24/62

ANO

PI TitleRecordable Injury Rate

Month/YearJan-09

StatusRed

Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecNumber of Lost-TimeAccidents (Employee)

0

Number of Restricted DutyAccidents (Employee)

0

Number of Other Recordablenjuries (Employee)

0

Recordable Injury Rate(Employee) - Month

0 0

Recordable Injury Rate(Employee) - YTD

0 0

Number of Lost-TimeAccidents (Contractor)

0

Number of Restricted Duty

Accidents (Contractor)

1

Number of Other Recordablenjuries (Contractor)

0

Recordable Injury Rate(Contractor) - Month

6 4

Recordable Injury Rate(Contractor) - YTD

6 4

Employee Work-Hours 147696 84081

Contractor Work-Hours 34996 55236

Total Station Work-Hours 182692 139317

Total OSHA Recordables 1 1

Total OSHA Recordables - YTD 1 1

Recordable Injury Rate -Month

1 1

Recordable Injury Rate -YTD 1 1

Recordable Injury Rate EOYEstimate

0

Goal YTD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

OSHA Recordable Injury Rate (RIR) - The number of recordable injuries (employees and supplemental personnel) per 200000 person-hours worked based on OccupationalSafety and Health Administration (OSHA) definitions. Includes Restricted Duty Accidents (RDA), Lost-Time Accidents (LTA) and Other Recordable Injuries.

Goals are Green 0.4 but 0.6

Safety Dept

OwnerTim Tullos

AnalyzerVicki MillsTitle Value

Number of Restricted Duty Accidents (Contractor) 0

Number of Other Recordable Injuries (Contractor) 0

Number of Lost-Time Accidents (Contractor) 0

21 of 59


25/62

Title. Value.Number of Restricted Duty Accidents (Contractor) 0

Number of Other Recordable Injuries (Contractor) 1

Number of Lost-Time Accidents (Contractor) 0

22 of 59


26/62

ANO

PI TitleTotal Industrial Safety AccidentRate (TISA)


StatusRed

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecEmployee injuriesMonth

0 0

Employee YTD Injuries 0 0

Contractor injuries -Month

0 1

Contractor YTD Injuries 0 1

TISA Month 0.00 1.44

TISA YTD 0.00 1.44

TISA YTD GOAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TISA EOY Estimate 0.00 0.08Cycle Average 0.00 0.05

This indicator is defined as the number of accidents per 200,000 person-hours worked for personnel assigned to the station includingcontractors that result in: one or more days of restricted work (excluding the day of the accident), one or more days away from work(excluding the day of the accident), and fatalities.

Set by HQ to etablish Goals for Top Performance Goal Green =0, White>0, Red>0.2.


AnalyzerBrad Berryman

FleetLink2007

2

23 of 59


27/62

ANO

PI TitleCR Inventory

Month/YearJan-09

StatusRed

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecNew CR's Opened inthe Month (CAT.A,B,C, D)

564 657

CR's Closed Duringthe Month (Cat.A,B,C, D)

517 697

Number of Open CR'sat Months End

778 778

Open CR BacklogTarget - (YTD ONLY)

750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 75

Average Number ofOpen CR's - YTD

65 778

EOY Goal 750

EOY Estimate 778

EOY Goal 750

EOY Estimate 778

A measure of the total number of CRs opened and closed during the period being monitored (category A, B, C, D). The backlog consists othe total number of Category A, B, and C CRs that remain open at the end of each period being monitored including CRs with Long Termactions assigned.

Open CRsGREEN =700 and 750

PCRS

OwnerBob Eichenberger

AnalyzerLarry McCarty

24 of 59


28/62

ANO

PI TitleCR (Cat A&B) Evaluation Performance

Month/YearJan-09

StatusGreen

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecNumber of CR Eval'sClosed - Month

33 18

Average Age of ClosedEval's (days)

21 23

Evaluation Age Goal 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 3

Average Age YTD 1.8 23

EOY Estimate 21

EOY Goal 30

The average evaluation time for Condition Reports (CR) during the month (measured in days). Does not include CRs that do not require aevaluation (e.g. CRs that get closed to work orders, trending, etc.). The age of the more significant CAT A and CAT B evaluations is beingtracked due to their importance and complexity.

Average age of evaluations to be less than 30 days. Green


29/62

epartment Plant UnitANO

PI TitleCR Average Age

Jan-09

StatusGreen

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecCR Average Age 142 150

CR Average Age Goal 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 18

EOY Estimate 142

EOY Goal 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 18

Average Age in days of Condition Reports that were open at any point during the reporting period, not including Condition Reports

restrained by Refueling Outages.

Green


30/62

ANO Unit-1

PI TitleEquipment Reliability Index

Month/YearJan-09

StatusWhite

8

Unplanned PowerRed. / 7000 hrs8

Post RefuelingOutagePerformance (100Days)0

Unplanned LCOEntries (SD & < 72hours)4

Operator WorkArounds2

High CriticalComponentFailures8

Safety SystemUnavailability8

System HealthImprov. Eff.4

3

TotalMaintenanceBacklog2

Deferral of PMs4

% PMs w/ Maint.Feedback2

% PMs Compl. in2nd Half of Grace6

Work WeekSched. Stability6

Work WeekSched. Adher.6

Long Range PlImpl. Effect.7

0

Chem. Effect. Ind.1

PM Program Bases2

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 Dec-- Long Range Plan Impl. Effect. 7

-- Forced Loss Rate(%) 8

-- Unplanned LCO Entries (SD &< 72 hours)

4

-- Safety System Unavai labi lity 8

-- % PMs w/ Maint. Feedback 2

-- Chem. Effect. Ind. 1

-- Deferral of PMs 4

-- Age of Red & Yellow Systems 0

-- Post Refueling OutagePerformance (100 Days)

0

-- PM Program Bases 2

-- High Critical ComponentFailures

8

-- Unplanned Power Red. /7000 hrs

8

-- Operator Work Arounds 2

-- System Health Improv. Eff. 4-- Corr. Maint. Backlog (NO) 3

-- Total Maintenance Backlog 4

-- % PMs Compl. in 2nd Half ofGrace

6

-- Work Week Sched. Stability 6

-- Work Week Sched. Adher. 6

Equipment Reliability Index 83 81

The goal of the ERI is to improve equipment reliability by use of the best available leading indicators and important lagging indicators in ER (19 Metrics). The ERI provides ahealth assessment of current and future performance, and provides a cross comparison (industry) for strengths/areas of focus.

FCS goal > 75% (End of 2008) Industry Top Quartile > 86% Green >= 85 White >=50 and < 85 Red < 50

27 of 59


31/62

Equipment Reliability Engineering


AnalyzerAngela Hartman

Year2009

28 of 59


32/62


33/62

Equipment Reliability Engineering


AnalyzerAngela Hartman

Year2009

30 of 59


34/62


35/62

ANO Unit-1

PI TitleCapacity Factor

Month/YearJan-09

StatusGreen

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecCAPACITY Factor -Month

47.74 102.90

CAPACITY Factor YTD 90.79 102.90

CAPACITY Factor- YTDGOAL

87.53 100.70 100.70 100.70 100.70 100.31 100.06 99.88 99.75 99.64 99.75 99.84 99.

Capacity Factor EOYEstimate

83.40 98.00 98.00

Capacity Factor EOYGoal

99.91 99.91 99.91 99.91 99.91 99.91 99.91 99.91 99.91 99.91 99.91

Projections 90.38 89.01

The ratio of net energy generation produced while the unit is online over a given time period to the maximum dependable capacity (groelectrical output at full power during the most restrictive seasonal conditions, less normal station service loads) over the same time periexpressed as a percentage.

value for a unit = NEG x 100%/ MDCwhere NEG = net energy generation

MDC = maximum dependable capacity

Target for capacity factor is based on the generation from the yearly financial model. Green is less than or equal to target, White is greathan target, and Red is less than 2% under target.

Electrical production



32 of 59


36/62

ANO Unit-1

PI TitleNet Generation

Month/YearJan-09

StatusGreen

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecProjections 0

Net Generation Month 296923 640046

Net Generation Yearto Date

6667457 640046

Net Generation End OfYear Estimate

6124046 7323690

Target GenerationMonth

424277 626314 565703 626314 606110 614648 594820 614648 614648 594820 626314 606110 626

Target Generation YTD 6427726 626314 1192017 1818331 2424441 3039089 3633909 4248557 4863205 5458025 6084339 6690449 7316

Gross electrical output of the unit measured at the output terminals of the turbine generator during the reporting period, minus the norstation service electrical energy utilization, uncorrected for transformer losses.

Target for capacity factor is based on the net generation used in the financial model. Max=Target +2%, Min= Target-2%. Net Generationgoals are matched to Capacity Factor Goals.



33 of 59


37/62

ANO Unit-2

PI TitleNet Generation

Month/YearJan-09

StatusRed

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecProjections 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Net Generation Month 753249 661170

Net Generation Yearto Date

753249 661170

Net Generation End OfYear Estimate

8060446

Target GenerationMonth

735682 734223 663169 734223 710539 726203 702777 726203 726203 94755 734223 710539 734

Target Generation YTD 735682 734223 1397392 2131615 2842154 3568357 4271134 4997337 5723540 5818295 6552518 7263057 7997

Gross electrical output of the unit measured at the output terminals of the turbine generator during the reporting period, minus the norstation service electrical energy utilization, uncorrected for transformer losses.

Target for capacity factor is based on the 2008 financial model for ENS. Max=Target +2%, Min= Target-2%. Net Generation goals arematched to Capacity Factor Goals.



34 of 59


38/62

ANO Unit-1

PI TitleOperator Aggregate Impact Index

Month/YearJan-09

StatusGreen

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecOWA - Non-outage 0

OWA - Outage 0

Burdens - Non-outage 1

Burdens - Outage 0

CRD's - Non-outage 0

CRD's - Outage 3

CRA's - Non-outage 0

CRA's - Outage 0

Clearances >90 Days -Non-outage

1

Clearances >90 Days -Outage

0

Caution Tags >90 Days- Non-outage

3

Caution Tags >90 Days- Outage

0

Component Deviations>90 Days - Non-outage

1

Component Deviations>90 Days - Outage

0

OAI - Non-Outage 0.12

Goal - Non-outage 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Total OAI Index 0.23

The weighted sum of control room deficiencies, operator work arounds, operator burdens, control room annunciators, protectiveclearances > 90 days old, caution/information tags >90 days old and component/valve deviation >90 days olds. Only Non-Outage Cautio

Tags, Clearances and Component Deviations having Priority 1, 2, or 3 Work Orders are included in the on-line Index.Calculation: Index = 0.34 * (OWA /1) + (0.33) * ((OB + CRD + CRA) / 9) + (0.33) * ((CL + CAUT + COM) / 20)

Goal is to maintain the on-line Operator Aggregate Impact Index (OAI) less than 1 and the Total OAI less than 1.5.Green: 1.0 and 1.8


AnalyzerJames Keys

35 of 59


39/62

ANO Unit-2

PI TitleOperator Aggregate Impact Index

Month/YearJan-09

StatusGray

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecOWA - Non-outage 0

OWA - Outage 1

Burdens - Non-outage 0

Burdens - Outage 1

CRD's - Non-outage 1

CRD's - Outage 10

CRA's - Non-outage 0

CRA's - Outage 1

Clearances >90 Days -Non-outage

2

Clearances >90 Days -Outage

1

Caution Tags >90 Days- Non-outage

1

Caution Tags >90 Days- Outage

0

Component Deviations>90 Days - Non-outage

0

Component Deviations>90 Days - Outage

4

OAI - Non-Outage 0.09

Goal - Non-outage 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Total OAI Index 0.72

The weighted sum of control room deficiencies, operator work arounds, operator burdens, control room annunciators, protectiveclearances > 90 days old, caution/information tags >90 days old and component/valve deviation >90 days olds. Only Non-Outage Cautio

Tags, Clearances and Component Deviations having Priority 1, 2, or 3 Work Orders are included in the on-line Index.Calculation: Index = 0.34 * (OWA /1) + (0.33) * ((OB + CRD + CRA) / 9) + (0.33) * ((CL + CAUT + COM) / 20)

Goal is to maintain the on-line Operator Aggregate Impact Index (OAI) less than 1 and the Total OAI less than 1.5.Green: 1.0 and 1.8


AnalyzerJames Keys

36 of 59


40/62

ANO Unit-2

PI TitleUnplanned AOT/LCO Trends

Month/YearJan-09

StatusGreen

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecUnplanned AOT/LCOTrends

1 1

YTD UnplannedAOT/LCO Trends

1 1

Monthly Goal 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

YTD Goal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1

EOY Goal 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 1

For an AOT to be counted by this indicator, it must be unplanned and contains an action statement which requires a plant shutdown if th

limiting condition can not be cleared.

Green 1

OPS LOG


AnalyzerStephanie Pyle

37 of 59


41/62

ANO Unit-1

PI TitleUnplanned AOT/LCO Trends

Month/YearJan-09

StatusGreen

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecUnplanned AOT/LCOTrends

1 1

YTD UnplannedAOT/LCO Trends

6 1

Monthly Goal 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

YTD Goal 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1

EOY Goal 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 1

For an AOT to be counted by this indicator, it must be unplanned and contains an action statement which requires a plant shutdown if th

limiting condition can not be cleared.

Green 1

OPS LOG


AnalyzerStephanie Pyle

38 of 59


42/62

ANO Unit-1

PI TitleTemporary Modifications (Non Outage) Open > 60 days

Month/YearJan-09

StatusGreen

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecNon-Outage TempMods

1 2

Outage Temp Mods 2 1

Total Temp Mods -Month

3 3

Non-Outage Goal 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

Temporary modifications, such as electrical jumpers, lifted leads, pulled circuit boards, disabled annunciators/alarms, mechanicalumpers/bypasses, and temporary setpoint changes.

OUTAGE TEMP MOD is interpreted to mean those Temp Mod installed that require an Outage to restore.NON-OUTAGE TEMP MOD is interpreted to mean those Temp Mod installed which can be restored during any Operating Mode.

Green: 4The Goal is based on Non-outage temp mods

ata Source OwnerCleve Reasoner

AnalyzerSteven L Smith

39 of 59


43/62

ANO Unit-2

PI TitleTemporary Modifications (Non Outage) Open > 60 days

Month/YearJan-09

StatusGreen

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecNon-Outage TempMods

2 2

Outage Temp Mods 7 7

Total Temp Mods -Month

9 9

Non-Outage Goal 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

Temporary modifications, such as electrical jumpers, lifted leads, pulled circuit boards, disabled annunciators/alarms, mechanicalumpers/bypasses, and temporary setpoint changes.

OUTAGE TEMP MOD is interpreted to mean those Temp Mod installed that require an Outage to restore.NON-OUTAGE TEMP MOD is interpreted to mean those Temp Mod installed which can be restored during any Operating Mode.

Green: 4The Goal is based on Non-outage temp mods

ata Source OwnerCleve Reasoner

AnalyzerSteven L Smith

40 of 59


44/62

ANO Unit-1

PI TitleNon-Outage Corr. Maint. Backlog

Month/YearJan-09

StatusGreen

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecNon-Outage CorrectiveMaintenance Backlog

3 3

CorrectiveMaintenance BacklogYTD Goal

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 1

Non-Outage ElectiveMaintenance Backlog

295 288

Corrective Aging 14 21

The total number of non-outage corrective maintenance work requests (WRs). Defined in EN-WM-100, which is based on INPO-AP-928.

Goals are Green 10 but 15

PASSPORT

OwnerRalph Dodds

AnalyzerPerry Kearney

41 of 59


45/62

ANO Unit-2

PI TitleNon-Outage Corr. Maint. Backlog

Month/YearJan-09

StatusGreen

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecNon-Outage CorrectiveMaintenance Backlog

5 9

CorrectiveMaintenance BacklogYTD Goal

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 1

Non-Outage ElectiveMaintenance Backlog

295 285

Corrective Aging 107 50

The total number of non-outage corrective maintenance work requests (WRs). Defined in EN-WM-100, which is based on INPO-AP-928.

Goals are Green 10 but 15

PASSPORT

OwnerRalph Dodds

AnalyzerPerry Kearney

42 of 59


46/62

ANO Unit-2

PI TitleSchedule Scope Stability

Month/YearJan-09

StatusGreen

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecActual YTD 92 93

Goal YTD 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92

Monthly Actual 92 93

The percentage of jobs included in the T-6 scope freeze that are still scheduled at the end of T-1. Stability (%) = (number of tasks in the Tschedule that were also in the T-6 schedule / number of tasks in the T-6 schedule) x 100.

Max-Target-Min (95- 92 - 85)Goals are Green >=92, White ,=85, Red


47/62

ANO Unit-1

PI TitleSchedule Scope Stability

Month/YearJan-09

StatusGreen

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecActual YTD 96 97

Goal YTD 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92

Monthly Actual 96 97

The percentage of jobs included in the T-6 scope freeze that are still scheduled at the end of T-1. Stability (%) = (number of tasks in the Tschedule that were also in the T-6 schedule / number of tasks in the T-6 schedule) x 100.

Max-Target-Min (95- 92 - 85)Goals are Green >=92, White ,=85, Red


48/62

ANO Unit-2

PI TitleSchedule Scope Adherence

Month/YearJan-09

StatusGray

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecYTD Actuals 93.0 92.0

YTD Goal 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 95

Monthly Actual 95.0 92.0

The percentage of activities in the schedule actually completed within the execution week against those that were scheduled forcompletion at the schedule freeze point.

Max-Target-Min 96 - 95 - 90

Goals are Green >=95, White =90, Red


49/62

ANO Unit-1

PI TitleSchedule Scope Adherence

Month/YearJan-09

StatusGray

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecYTD Actuals 95.0 94.0

YTD Goal 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 95

Monthly Actual 95.0 94.0

The percentage of activities in the schedule actually completed within the execution week against those that were scheduled forcompletion at the schedule freeze point.

Max-Target-Min 96 - 95 - 90

Goals are Green >=95, White =90, Red


50/62

ANO

PI TitleSignificant Events

Month/YearJan-09

StatusGray

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecSignificant Events -Month

0

Noteworthy Events -Month

0

Significant Events -YTD

0

Noteworthy Events -YTD

0

Significant Events -Monthly Goal

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Significant/Noteworthy Events-Month

0

Significant/Noteworthy Events-YTD

0

The total number of significant events recorded during the month. Significant/Noteworthy events are defined by INPO 94-001, Rev 1.

GOAL: Zero Significant Events per month.

INPO Plant Events Database OwnerAlan Ettlinger AnalyzerSam Cecil

47 of 59


51/62

ANO

PI TitleStaffing

Month/YearJan-09

StatusGray

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecSite Total 775 771

Contractor Total 176 291

All utility personnel permanently assigned to the plant, excluding baseline contractors.

No specific Site goal has been established.

Human Resources

OwnerTodd Chilcoat

AnalyzerDanielle Thompson

Year

48 of 59


52/62

ANO

PI TitlePersonnel Error Rate

Month/YearJan-09

StatusGray

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecNumber of Errors -Month

1

Monthly Error Rate 0.05

Number of Errors - YTD 7

YTD Error Rate 0.02

YTD Goal 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.0

EOY Error RateEstimate

0.01

12 Month Rolling ErrorRate

0.02

Number of Human Performance Errors as defined by HU-101 a month per 10000 person hours worked.

Green


53/62

ANO

PI TitleSourceView NFOM

Month/YearJan-09

StatusGreen

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecNon-capital spending-Month

13.590 12.471

Non-capital spending-YTD

14 12

Non-capital spending-YTD Goal

13 12

Non-capital spending-EOY Goal

156

This indicator measures the non-capital spending at the reporting facility, including allocation to headquarters, excluding fuel.

Green Budget, Red > Target + 2%

NBM

OwnerMarla Gardner

AnalyzerBernice Oscar

50 of 59


54/62

ANO

PI TitleSourceView Total Capital

Month/YearJan-09

StatusGreen

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecCapital Spending -Month

13.636 1.822

Capital Spending -YTD 13.636 1.822

Capital Spending YTDGoal

2.911 3.156

Capital spending EOYGoal

79.788

All costs associated with improvements and modifications made during the reporting year, for which a capital ruling was made. This

includes design, installation, equipment costs, Misc capital additions, etc. Data is in Millions.

Green Budget, Red > Target + 2%

ata Source OwnerMarla Gardner

AnalyzerBernice Oscar

51 of 59


55/62

ANO

PI TitleProduction Cost

Month/YearJan-09

StatusRed

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecProduction Cost-Month

47.34 15.92

Production Cost-YTD 3.95 15.92

Production Cost-YTDGoal

17.04

Production Cost-EOYGoal

17.04

The expenditures (numerator) include:1 Site, Headquarters and ESI O&M (excluding power bill at GGNS), 2 Annual fuel costs including

lease,3 Normalized outage. The generation (denominator) is calculated based on annual generation.

Green: Monthly Goal is achieved.Red: Monthly Goal is not achieved.

Green


56/62

ANO

PI TitleProduction Cost Plus Capital

Month/YearJan-09

StatusRed

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecProduction Cost plusCapital-Month

60.510 22605.000

Production Cost plusCapital-YTD

23.310 22605.000

Production Cost plusCapital-YTD Goal

22.580

Production Cost plusCapital-EOY Estimate

22.960

The expenditures (numerator) include: 1 Site, Headquarters and ESI O&M (excluding power bill at GGNS), 2 Annual fuel costs includinglease, 3 Normalized outage, 4 New Capital - responsibility view - cash basis. The generation (denominator) is calculated based on annualgeneration.

Graph is YTD spending versus YTD Goal. Only Red/Green. Green Budget.


AnalyzerCliff Gatlin

53 of 59


57/62

ANO

PI TitleOvertime Rate - Non-Outage

Month/YearJan-09

StatusRed

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecNon-Outage OvertimeYTD

74523 326673

Non-Outage OvertimeYTD

74523 326673

YTD Non-OutageOvertime Rate (%)v

5.54 9.56

YTD Non-OutageOvertime Rate (%)Goal

3.19 4.56

EOY Non-OutageOvertime Rate (%)Estimate

5.94

EOY Non-OutageOvertime Rate (%)Goal

3.19

Overtime cost for the period as a percentage of the base payroll during the period. Overtime includes shift differential but excludespremiums and bonuses. Base payroll includes straight time, holiday, sick leave, vacation, etc. Only Entergy permanent Employees(mgmt & union) are monitored. This % indicator displays the total overtime dollars paid for non-outage, non-capital hours divided bythe straight time dollars paid during the period.

Green budget, Red > 2% over budget


AnalyzerCliff Gatlin

54 of 59


58/62

ANO

PI TitleInventory

Month/YearJan-09

StatusGray

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecInventory-Month 56.075 59.869

Inventory-Month Goal 56.400 59.919

GL Balance Balance of Materials On Hand, Received in 2008, and Reserved to Work Orders for the next refueling outage Balance ofMaterials On Hand, received in 2008 and Reserved to Capital Work Orders Supplemental exclusions (executive level approval required)Adjusted Inventory Balance.

Common Fleet Goal:

Green 0% growth and 2% growth

MPC

OwnerMichael Little

AnalyzerAnthony Toney

Year2009

55 of 59


59/62

ANO

PI TitleRadwaste Generated

Month/YearJan-09

StatusRed

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecRadwaste Generated-Month

4470.0 2148.0

Radwaste Generated-YTD

4470.0 2148.0

Radwaste Generated-YTD Goal

5140 1354

The volume of low-level solid radioactive waste generated indicator monitors progress toward reducing the volume of low-level wastegenerated.

Goal based on availability of funds (accrual for legacy waste and 2003 waste disposal budget) to process existing radioactive material onsite to determine what is reusable material and what is rad waste. Only Red / Green. Green goal.

ata Source OwnerDavid Moore

AnalyzerDon Marvel

56 of 59


60/62


61/62


62/62

ANO

PI TitleHazardous Waste Generation

Month/YearJan-09

StatusGreen

Description Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 DecHazardous WasteGeneration - Month

80 225

Hazardous WasteGeneration - MonthGoal

500 600 600 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 50

Hazardous WasteGeneration - YTD

80 225

Total pounds of hazardous waste generated as a result of plant activities.

Green: Monthly hazardous waste generation less than or equal to 600 pounds. White:Monthly hazardous waste generation greater than600 pounds but not more than 2200 pounds. Red: Monthly hazardous waste generation greater than 2200 pounds.

ata Source OwnerTeresa Madeley

AnalyzerDennis Calloway

CommitChanges

Exported on: 03/05/2009 13:44 CST by: Simmons, James

Documents

Transcript of Exported on: 03/05/2009 13:44 CST by: Simmons, James