High Throughput Exposure Prediction for the ExpoCast Project
ExpoCast : Exposure Science for Prioritization and …...ExpoCastTM: Exposure Science for...
Transcript of ExpoCast : Exposure Science for Prioritization and …...ExpoCastTM: Exposure Science for...
April 6, 2010Office of Research and DevelopmentNational Center for Computational Toxicology
EPA Chemical Prioritization Community of PracticeApril 22, 2010
Elaine Cohen HubalNational Center for Computational Toxicology
ExpoCastTM: Exposure Science for Prioritization and Toxicity Testing
1Office of Research and DevelopmentNational Center for Computational Toxicology
Toxicity Testing in the Twenty-first Century
• Key aspect of the NRC vision is that new tools are available to examine toxicity pathways in a depth and breadth that has not been possible
• Efforts to apply high-throughput-screening (HTS) approaches for chemical prioritization and toxicity testing have been accelerated
• An explosion of HTS data for in vitro toxicity assays will become available over the next few years ---- Data are available now!
• How will this new toxicity information be translated to assess potential for real-world human health risk?
2Office of Research and DevelopmentNational Center for Computational Toxicology NAS, June 2007.
Toxicity Testing in the Twenty-first Century: A Vision and a Strategy
3Office of Research and DevelopmentNational Center for Computational Toxicology
Exposure Science in NRC Vision - TRANSLATION
• Population-based data and human exposure information critical for guiding development and use of toxicity information
• Components include:– Use of information on host susceptibility and background exposures
to interpret and extrapolate in vitro test results.– Use of human exposure data to select doses for toxicity testing so
we develop hazard information on environmentally-relevanteffects.
– Use of biomonitoring data to relate real-world human exposures with concentrations that perturb toxicity pathways to identify potentially important (biologically-relevant) exposures.
4Office of Research and DevelopmentNational Center for Computational Toxicology
Source
Fate/Transport
Exposure
Tissue Dose
Biologic Interaction
Perturbation
BiologicInputs
NormalBiologicFunction
Morbidityand
Mortality
Cell Injury
Adaptive StressResponses
Early CellularChanges
Modified from NRC, 2007
Exposure Science in NRC Vision
5Office of Research and DevelopmentNational Center for Computational Toxicology
Will fundamental knowledge of toxicity pathways improve understanding of real-world human-health risk?
• Assessing complex human-health risks requires that hazard, susceptibility, and exposure are all reliably characterized.
• Currently, balance of efforts to improve measuring hazard and exposure less than ideal.
• Accurate assessment of many environmental exposures remains an outstanding and largely unmet challenge in toxicology and risk assessment.
• To realize the NRC vision, we face a critical need for advanced exposure science.
Adapted from Wild, 2005
6Office of Research and DevelopmentNational Center for Computational Toxicology
ExpoCastTM: Exposure Science for Prioritization and Toxicity Testing
• Recognizes critical need for exposure information to inform – Chemical design and evaluation– Health risk management
• Goal– Advance characterization of exposure required to translate findings in
computational toxicology to support exposure and risk assessment– Together with ToxCast™ help EPA determine priority chemicals
• Approach – Mine and apply scientific advances and tools in a broad range of fields– Develop novel approaches for evaluating chemicals based on potential
for biologically-relevant human exposure
April 6, 2010Office of Research and DevelopmentNational Center for Computational Toxicology
Select doses for toxicity testing
Relate real-world exposures with toxicity pathway perturbations
Translate in vitro results for risk assessment
ExposureBackground Exposure
HumanEnvironment
Biomonitoring
Population
Uptake
N
N N
NH NH
Cl
Exposure Media
Contact
Products
Sources
Chemicals
HostSusceptibility
Biotransformation
Rapid Prioritization
ExposomeInformatics Approaches
Network Models
Knowledge Systems
Mechanistic Models
Data Repositories
TOOLSTOOLS
N
N N
NH NH
Cl
Toxicity endpoints
In vivo bioassays
HTS assays
Distribution/Fate
Ann Richard, NCCT
8Office of Research and DevelopmentNational Center for Computational Toxicology
New technologies must be applied to BOTH toxicology and exposure science if the ultimate goal of evaluating chemical safety is to be achieved.
• Systems exposure science
• Biologically-relevant exposure metrics
• Environmental informatics and advanced computational models
Cohen Hubal, Tox Sci, 2009
9Office of Research and DevelopmentNational Center for Computational Toxicology
StressorBiological Receptor OutcomePerturbation Perturbation
Population
Individual
Tissue
Cell
Biological Molecules
Environmental Source
Ambient Exposure
Environmental Source Personal
Exposure
Internal Exposure (Tissue Dose)
Dose to Cell
Dose of Stressor Molecules
Disease Incidence/Prevalence
Disease State(Changes to Health Status)
Dynamic Tissue Changes(Tissue Injury)
Dynamic Cell Changes(Alteration in Cell Division,
Cell Death)
Dynamic Changes in Intracellular Processes
Figure 1Cohen Hubal, JESEE, 2008
Systems Biology: Exposure at All Levels of Biological Organization
10Office of Research and DevelopmentNational Center for Computational Toxicology
Systems Exposure Science : Extending Network Analysis
Consider coupled networks spanning multiple levels of biological organization
11Office of Research and DevelopmentNational Center for Computational Toxicology
Biologically-Relevant Exposure Metrics
Markers required that can be directly associated with key events in disease processes and with individual exposure profiles
– ‘Omic technologies showing potential to yield a new generation of exposure metrics (Wild, 2009)(Altered global gene expression associated with exposures to arsenic, cigarette smoke, benzene, metal fumes and air pollution)
– Better environmental biosensors required to study gene-environment interactions associated with complex disease (Collins 2007)(Nano-scale sensor arrays can be developed to detect specific sets of environmental agents (Andreescu et al, 2009))
12Office of Research and DevelopmentNational Center for Computational Toxicology
PAHs, VOCs, NO2
Indoor/Outdoor Air
PM, Air Toxics
Ambient Air
Markers of Exposure
Markers of Susceptibility
Health status, other risk factors: BMI, HDL, blood chemistry
Genotypes at Candidate SNPs(HLA-DRB1, HLA-DQB1, FCER1B, ADAM33, CD14, IL4, IL13, GSTM1, GSTP1, GSTT1, TNF-a)
Other Immune Markers: Total IgE, allergen specific
Markers of Effect
Nicotine, PAHs, etc.
ETS
Secreted Autoantibodies:Neutrophils, Eosinophils, Monocytes
Asthma
Respiratory Symptoms
Gene Expression
Lung Function,eNO,eVOC
Inflammatory Markers:Cytokines, Chemokines
Child
MICA Framework
Allergy
Metals, Molds, Endotoxin,Pesticides
House Dust
CotininePAH Metabolites1-OH PyreneNapthols, etc.
Metals:Lead, Mercury,Arsenic, etc.
Age, Gender, Race/ethnicity
Cardiovascular
Obesity
Gallagher, Cohen Hubal, et al.
13Office of Research and DevelopmentNational Center for Computational Toxicology
Exposure-Hazard Knowledge System
• Computational Techniques – Two Branches A combination of discovery and engineering (mechanistic)-based modeling approaches for hypothesis development and testing are required.
• Knowledge-discovery – Data-collection, mining, and analysis– Required to extract information from extant data on critical exposure
determinants, link exposure information with toxicity data, and identify limitations and gaps in exposure data.
• Mechanistic (dynamic) simulation– Mathematical modeling at various levels of detail – Required to model the human-environment system and to test our
understanding of this system.
14Office of Research and DevelopmentNational Center for Computational Toxicology
Exposure-Hazard Knowledge System
• Translation of HTP hazard information requires holistic risk assessment knowledge system – Include ontologies, databases, linkages – Facilitate computerized collection, organization, and retrieval of
exposure, hazard, and susceptibility information
• Standardized exposure ontologies required to – Define relationships, allow automated reasoning, facilitate meta
analyses – Develop biologically-relevant exposure metrics– Design in vitro toxicity tests to measure environmentally-relevant
hazard– Incorporate information on susceptibility and background
exposures to individual and population-level risks
15Office of Research and DevelopmentNational Center for Computational Toxicology
Schematic of ontologies, databases and ontology/database linkages needed for the efficient development of a Foods-for-Health Knowledge System
MC Lange, et al. (2007) A multi-ontology framework to guide agriculture and food towards diet and health. J Sci Food and Ag 87(8)1427-34.
16Office of Research and DevelopmentNational Center for Computational Toxicology
Priority Exposure Research for Computational Toxicology
• Accessible and linkable exposure databases
• Exposure screening tools for accelerated chemical prioritization
• Advanced computational approaches for interpreting in vitro toxicity data in the context of individual and population health
• Biologically-relevant exposure metrics (biomarkers reliably associated with exposure)
Human vulnerability and life-stage aspects are integral to each of these.
Sheldon and Cohen, EHP, 2009
17Office of Research and DevelopmentNational Center for Computational Toxicology
Incorporating Exposure Databases into ACToR
http://actor.epa.gov
Exposure
Source/StressorFormation
Transport/Fate
EnvironmentalConcentration
Production/ Import
Volumes
Chemicals in Consumer Products
EnvironmentalReleases
Product Usage
Information
Indoor Air Monitoring
Data
Human Exposure
Monitoring
Production/ Process
Information
Environmental Transformation
Outdoor Air Monitoring
Data
Exposure Limits
Activity Patterns
Information
Human Biological Monitoring
Data
EPA HPVIS
EPA IUR
EU ESIS
EPA TRI
DOE GHG
Household Products DB
Cosmetic Voluntary Reg. DB
EPA Pesticide Usage Data
UK Pharma-ceutical Usage
EPA HPVIS
ATSDR ToxProfiles
DEA NFLIS
Environmental Fate Simulator
ECOTOX DB
CESAR
DOE IndoorAir
NHEXAS
CTEPP
EPA NATA
EPA AIRS/AFS
UN IPCC GHG
NHEXAS
EUROPA Pest-Diet
EPA NHAPS
EPA CHAD
CDC NHANES
NHEXAS
CTEPP
NIOSH NOES
AIHA WEEL
OSHA PEL
Exposure
Source/StressorFormation
Transport/Fate
EnvironmentalConcentration
Production/ Import
Volumes
Chemicals in Consumer Products
EnvironmentalReleases
Product Usage
Information
Indoor Air Monitoring
Data
Human Exposure
Monitoring
Production/ Process
Information
Environmental Transformation
Outdoor Air Monitoring
Data
Exposure Limits
Activity Patterns
Information
Human Biological Monitoring
Data
EPA HPVIS
EPA IUR
EU ESIS
EPA TRI
DOE GHG
Household Products DB
Cosmetic Voluntary Reg. DB
EPA Pesticide Usage Data
UK Pharma-ceutical Usage
EPA HPVIS
ATSDR ToxProfiles
DEA NFLIS
Environmental Fate Simulator
ECOTOX DB
CESAR
DOE IndoorAir
NHEXAS
CTEPP
EPA NATA
EPA AIRS/AFS
UN IPCC GHG
NHEXAS
EUROPA Pest-Diet
EPA NHAPS
EPA CHAD
CDC NHANES
NHEXAS
CTEPP
NIOSH NOES
AIHA WEEL
OSHA PEL
Peter Egeghy, NERL
18Office of Research and DevelopmentNational Center for Computational Toxicology
DiseasesGenes
Chemicals
chemical-diseaserelationships
chemical-diseaserelationships
chemical‐geneinteractions
chemical‐geneinteractions
gene-diseaserelationships
gene-diseaserelationships
pathway data
functional annotations
Exposure Data (curated and public
sources)
Exposure Data (curated and public
sources)Carolyn Mattingly,
Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory
19Office of Research and DevelopmentNational Center for Computational Toxicology
Integrated Chemical Prioritization Scheme
A numerical index that can be used for ranking (instead of absolute thresholds) is more flexible for different prioritization tasks.Can better accommodate new data, new chemicals, data adjustments, etc.
ToxPi (Toxicological Priority Index)• Integrate over multiple domains of information
• Extend to incorporate additional types of data
• Transparently derive and visualize
• Customize components for diverse prioritization tasks
Chemical properties
Pathways
In vitro assays
Exposure
20Office of Research and DevelopmentNational Center for Computational Toxicology
Exposure-Based Chemical Prioritization Workshop: Exploring Opportunities for Collaboration
RTP, NC, April 6-7, 2010
http://epa.gov/ncct/expocast/workshop.html
21Office of Research and DevelopmentNational Center for Computational Toxicology
Workshop Highlights
Participants IncludedHealth CanadaRIVMEU JRCUS FDAUS CPSCUS EPA (OPPTS, ORD, GLNPO)Washington StateU OttawaU MichiganU TorontoEOHSI/UMDNJLBNLExxon Mobile
22Office of Research and DevelopmentNational Center for Computational Toxicology
Workshop Highlights – Mandates for Prioritization
Health Canada (Christine Norman)• Completing assessments for 500 high priorities• Focus on 3000 medium priority, complete by 2020
– 36% organic, 11% inorganic, 14% polymers, 27% UVCB– 58% zero data, another 23% data poor
US CPSC (Treye Thomas)• Thousands of products in and around the home• Challenges in exposure
– Product Ingredients, Consumer Use Information– Method Validation, Probabilistic Methods– International Cooperation– Nanotechnology
US EPA GLNPO (Ted Smith)• P&B screening not appropriate for important groups of chemicals in
commerce (e.g., ionic)• Surveillance strategy based on Adverse Outcome Pathway framework
23Office of Research and DevelopmentNational Center for Computational Toxicology
Workshop Highlights – Tools and Approaches
Benchmarking prioritization models (Olivier Jolliet)• Start with parsimonious model, develop and evaluate a suite of
consistent tools to assess same metrics, but at different levels and detail• Evaluate the relative importance of parameters and intermediary steps in
the screening results • USEtox development process (Model evaluation; Publication and expert
review; Approval by International Life Cycle Panel)• Intake Fraction (fraction emission taken in by population)
Ground truthing prioritization schemes (Bette Meek)• Broadly draw on existing experience on limited # chemicals to inform
efficient evaluation of the rest (e.g., use more important than volume)• Identify chemicals for quantitative anchoring of “surrogates”• Select simplest most discriminating determinants• “Design” to limit exposure
24Office of Research and DevelopmentNational Center for Computational Toxicology
Workshop Highlights – Tools and Approaches
Value of information (Michael Sohn)• Approach for comparing decisions/consequences where uncertainty is
important• Can be used to combine different types of limited data (e.g., biomarker,
monitoring, modeling)• Grade relative rankings• Extrapolate from known chemicals to unknown
Limits of persistance and bioaccumulation (Jon Arnot)• P & B categorization data should not be used for exposure-based priority
setting for humans and ecological receptors • Mass balance multimedia exposure models can provide alternative
“holistic” hypotheses linking emissions to exposures (e.g., RAIDAR)• Integrated testing strategies required for property data and QSAR
development to expand “domains” of knowledge and predictability
25Office of Research and DevelopmentNational Center for Computational Toxicology
Acknowledgements
• NCCT – Bob Kavlock• ExpoCastTM – Peter Egeghy, Richard Judson, Sumit Gangwal,
Bonnie Joubert, plus • ToxCast ™ - David Dix, Keith Houck, plus many• MICA Study - Jane Gallagher, Stephen Edwards, David Reif, plus
Disclaimer
Although this work was reviewed by EPA and approved for presentation, it may not necessarily reflect official Agency policy.