Exploring Spatial Measurement Through a Conceptual Lens Lorraine Males, Funda Gonulates, Shannon...
-
Upload
dylan-foster -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Exploring Spatial Measurement Through a Conceptual Lens Lorraine Males, Funda Gonulates, Shannon...
Exploring Spatial Measurement Through a Conceptual Lens
Lorraine Males, Funda Gonulates, Shannon Sweeny, Nic Gilbertson
©STEM @ MSU 2011 – Math in Action, Grand Valley State University
Strengthening Tomorrow’s Education in Measurement (STEM) Project
IntroductionsLorraine – 4th yr doctoral student, working on the STEM project
all 4 years, taught secondary methods, currently supervising interns, taught middle/high school mathematics for 8 years
2©STEM @ MSU 2011 – Math in Action, Grand Valley State University
Funda – 3th yr doctoral student, working on the STEM project all 3 years, formerly taught middle school mathematics for 4 years
Shannon – 4th yr doctoral student, taught elementary & middle school for 8 years (2 years as a math specialist), taught elementary math methods & currently supervise elementary interns @ MSU
Nic – 2nd year doctoral student, taught middle school & high school math for 6 years, currently teaching elementary methods courses at MSU
Agenda
3©STEM @ MSU 2011 – Math in Action, Grand Valley State University
• Introductions• Reflections on Measurement• A Look at Some National Data• Introduction to the STEM Project• Measurement Tasks• A Look at STEMS’s Curriculum Data• Evaluation
Reflections on MeasurementTake some time to think about and share your answer with a partner to the following:
4
What are the key ideas you want your students to know about measurement?
What do you find challenging about teaching length, area and/or volume?
©STEM @ MSU 2011 – Math in Action, Grand Valley State University
The Toothpick (Broken Ruler) Problem
“What is the length of the toothpick?”
[NAEP, Grade 4, 2003, Open response]
©STEM @ MSU 2011 – Math in Action, Grand Valley State University 5
Toothpick Performance Data[Grade 4, 2003, open response]
Response % Responding
2 ½ inches (correct)
10 ½ inches
3 ½ inches
Other
Omitted
©STEM @ MSU 2011 – Math in Action, Grand Valley State University 6
20
14
23
42
2
Toothpick Performance Data
Response % Responding
2 ½ inches (correct)
58
10 ½ inches 13
3 ½ inches 20
8 ½ inches 7
©STEM @ MSU 2011 – Math in Action, Grand Valley State University 7
Response % Responding
2 ½ inches (correct)
20
10 ½ inches 14
3 ½ inches 23
Other 42
Omitted 2
[Grade 8, 2003, multiple choice][Grade 4, 2003, open response]
Toothpick Results Over Time
©STEM @ MSU 2011 – Math in Action, Grand Valley State University 8
Percent Correct
Assessment Year 4th Grade 8th Grade
1996 24 64
2000 25 64
2003 20* 58*
* Statistically lower than 1996 and 2000.
NAEP results across three assessments
The STEM Project• Initial situation
– Problem was recognized; no explanation – So no idea about where to invest in a “solution”
• STEM I: Examine the curricular contribution (elementary curricula)– Two years (Fall 2007- Fall 2009)– Do current US elementary mathematics provide
sufficient “opportunity to learn” (OTL) spatial measurement
• STEM II: Put what we have learned to work– Three years (August 2009 – July 2012)– PD is one project component
9©STEM @ MSU 2011 – Math in Action, Grand Valley State University
STEM – Three Curricula
The three carefully chosen curricula are:Scott Foresman-
Addison Wesley Mathematics
UCSMP’s Everyday Mathematics
Saxon Math
10©STEM @ MSU 2011 – Math in Action, Grand Valley State University
STEM – Our AnalysisIn our analysis we are looking at every lesson, problem, and activity of teaching curricula for two important aspects:Knowledge elements - Spatial measurement
knowledge (conceptual, procedural, conventional)[What content is in the textbook]
Textual elements - The ways in which this knowledge is expressed (statements, demonstrations, worked examples, questions, problems, games)[How the content is presented in the textbook]
11©STEM @ MSU 2011 – Math in Action, Grand Valley State University
Measurement Tasks – Part I
• Length– Strange Rulers – original STEM task
• Area – Crazy Cakes – Investigations, grade 4/Developing
Mathematical Ideas (DMI)• Volume
– The Wet Box Task – adapted from Dr. Michael Steele
Pick one of these measures (length, area, or volume) and complete the task
©STEM @ MSU 2011 – Math in Action, Grand Valley State University 12
Measurement Tasks – Part II
What would a student need to understand about measurement
in order to successfully complete this task?
[Record on your poster paper]
©STEM @ MSU 2011 – Math in Action, Grand Valley State University 13
Some Results (LENGTH)• All three curricula are heavily procedural
(more than 75% of all codes, all curricula, Grades K–3)
• Common procedures– Direct Comparison– Visual & Indirect Comparison– Measure with Rulers– Draw line segments of given lengths– Calculate perimeter
14©STEM @ MSU 2011 – Math in Action, Grand Valley State University
More Results (LENGTH)Some conceptual knowledge is addressed
Element Frequency
Definition of length Uncommon; hard to do
Greater means longer Very common
Unit-measure compensation Fairly common
Unit Iteration Uncommon; gaps & overlaps
15©STEM @ MSU 2011 – Math in Action, Grand Valley State University
Some Results (AREA)• All three curricula are even more procedural
with area than with length (more than 88% in grade K-4)
• Common procedures– Visual Comparison
– Covering and counting to find area
– Computing area with formulas (starting with rectangles)
16©STEM @ MSU 2011 – Math in Action, Grand Valley State University
K-1
K-2
2-3
More Results (AREA)• Very little conceptual knowledge
Element Frequency
Definition of area Uncommon
Unit Iteration Uncommon
Unit-measure compensation Uncommon
Area remains the same when partitioned (gr. 3 & 4)
Very uncommon (1 in each curricula)
Composition/Decomposition of Regular Polygons (gr. Gr. 4)
Very uncommon (2 in EM)
17©STEM @ MSU 201 – Math in Action, Grand Valley State University
Some Results (VOLUME)• All three curricula are heavily procedural
(more than 75% of all codes, all curricula, Grades K–1)
• Common procedures– Visual Comparison– Measure capacity/volume with standards and
non-standard units– Estimating Capacity/Volume
18©STEM @ MSU 2011 – Math in Action, Grand Valley State University
More Results (VOLUME)Some conceptual knowledge is addressed
Element Frequency
Greater means larger Uncommon
Definition of volume/capacity Very Uncommon
Unit-measure compensation Very Uncommon
Unit Iteration Very Uncommon
Only units of vol/cap can be used to measure volume/capacity
Uncommon
The spatial structure of rectangular prisms
Uncommon
19©STEM @ MSU 2011 – Math in Action, Grand Valley State University
Major Lessons
• Conceptual foundations of measurement are weakly developed
• Weak attention to Unit Iteration (length, area, volume)
• Conjecture: The sheer extent of visual content on the page (esp. for EM & SFAW) may make it hard for teachers to find and focus on the conceptual content
• Implication: Teachers will need to enrich the written curriculum
20©STEM @ MSU 2011 – Math in Action, Grand Valley State University
Thank you!We want to thank the National Science
Foundation for funding this work
We want to thank you for coming!Please take a few minute to fill out our evaluation.
For more information :http://www.msu.edu/~stemproj
If you have any questions please e-mail us at: [email protected]
21©STEM @ MSU 2011 – Math in Action, Grand Valley State University