Experimental Analysis of a Curricular Intervention on Student Achievement and Transition Outcomes
-
Upload
pandora-byers -
Category
Documents
-
view
17 -
download
2
description
Transcript of Experimental Analysis of a Curricular Intervention on Student Achievement and Transition Outcomes
1
Experimental Analysis of a Curricular Intervention on Student Achievement and
Transition Outcomes OSEP Project Directors Conference
Margo Vreeburg Izzo, Ph.D., The Ohio State University Nisonger Center
Kelly Dillon, MA, The Ohio State University Nisonger Center
http://nisonger.osu.edu/transition.htm
2
Need for Information andTechnological Literacy
• Defined as the set of skills needed to find, retrieve, analyze and use information.
• Individuals who are both technologically and information literate will be able to use computers effectively to find the information they need.
• Useful for people with disabilities because they enhance communication, learning, writing, and task management.
• Creates equal opportunities in education and aid in transition from school to work.
• Teachers and students appreciate the independent self-directed learning technology can provide.
3
EnvisionIT CurriculumAn online curriculum for ALL high
school students that teaches:• Information Technology (IT) Literacy• Self-directed Transition Planning• National and Ohio English/Language
Arts Standards• National and Ohio Technology
Standards.• Age Appropriate Transition Assessment
4
EnvisionIT Curriculum• 40 hour curriculum in Technology or
English/Language Arts classes • Grades 9–12• 6th grade reading level, on average• 10 complete units, 8 with Guided Notes &
quizzes• Students complete information technology
and reading comprehension activities• Students create Self-Directed Transition
Portfolios.
5
Need for EnvisionIT• EnvisionIT integrates IT and transition
skills into general curricula.
• Students become more engaged and invested in learning by using relevant material.
• Examples: Online self-assessments, searching the Internet for information on career choices, developing resumes, cover letters, high school course plans.
6
Curriculum Intervention Study
2006-07A pretest-posttest control group design was used to answer the following research questions:
1. Did the EnvisionIT online transition curriculum increase student IT literacy?
2. Did the EnvisionIT online transition curriculum increase student transition planning skills?
7
Methods: Setting and Participants
• 15 high schools randomly assigned stratified by SES• 7 experimental schools• 8 control schools
• 19 inclusive classrooms• 18 resource room/direct instruction
classrooms• English/Language Arts classrooms &
Technology classrooms• Year 1 N=287
8
Dependent Measures: IT Literacy
Information Technology Literacy Survey
• 21-item multiple choice test used as pretest and posttest
• The curriculum-based measurement was found to be reliable (Cronbach’s Alpha =.822, ICC =.676)
• Example Question: Web directories and search engines are created differently. Search engines are made by ________.
9
Dependent Measures: Transition Skills
Ohio State Career Survey
• 23 item survey to measure students’ perceptions of their transition skills
• The curriculum based measurement was found to be reliable (Cronbach’s Alpha =.847, ICC = .740).
• Example Question: Please rate your knowledge about finding jobs.
10
Preliminary Results: Analytic Sample
Year 1 Participants (N=287)
• 59% did not have a documented disability.
• 41% had a documented disability,
• 17% had a learning disability
• 14% had mental retardation
• 11% had other documented disabilities (e.g., autism, multiple disabilities, SED/SBH, Speech, TBI and OHI).
11
Preliminary Results: Analytic Sample
• 80% were from rural school districts
• 55% were male
• 87% were of Caucasian ethnicity, 12% are African-American, Hispanic, Asian, or of other decent.
• 47% were 9th graders (65% in experimental group compared to 25% in control group)
• 68% were not reading either independently or instructionally at grade level.
12
EnvisionIT Year 1 Descriptive StatisticsVariable Experimental (N=153) Control (N=134)
School SettingSuburban 17% 25%
Rural 83% 75%
GenderMale 56% 55%
Female 44% 45%
Ethnicity
White 93% 82%
African-American 3% 8%
Other 4% 10%
Classroom SettingResource Room 34% 47%
Inclusive 66% 53%
Disability StatusNo Disability 59% 57%
Disability 41% 43%
Reading Ability
Benchmark 32% 22%
Strategic Intervention 35% 47%
Intensive Intervention 33% 31%
Grade Level9th Grade 65% 25%
10th-12th Grades 35% 75%
13
Preliminary Results: IT LiteracyTable 1. Comparison of mean change in Information-Technology Literacy Scores by
Student Classification Group.
Experimental Control t value p value*
Total Sample 3.493 0.571 3.5446 .0005* Disability Status Students with disabilities 1.241 -0.125 1.4265 .1549 Students without disabilities 5.745 1.268 3.6013 .0004* Grade Level 9th graders 2.883 1.186 0.9573 .3393 10th-12th graders 4.103 -0.043 3.7989 .0002* AIMSweb Classification Intensive Intervention 1.294 -0.573 1.6787 .0944 Strategic Intervention 3.666 1.229 2.3133 .0215* Benchmark Intervention 5.518 1.059 3.4553 .0006* School Location Suburbun 4.506 1.013 2.5605 .0110* Rural 2.480 0.130 3.1184 .0020*
*after controlling for the other predictors in the model, p ≤ .05.
14
Preliminary Transition Results:
Knowledge of Finding JobsExperimental students with and without disabilities had significant gains in knowledge post-test compared to control students with and without disabilities.
Mean Lower 95% Upper 95%
Students without Disabilities
Experimental .2747 .0402 .5093
Control .1558 -.1073 .4189
Students with Disabilities
Experimental .3226 .0149 .6303
Control .2632 -.1105 .6368
15
Preliminary Transition Results:
Finding College Information
Compared to control students with disabilities, experimental students with disabilities had greater gains in reported ability to find college information.
Mean Lower 95% Upper 95%
Students with disabilities
Experimental .4677 .1307 .8048
Control .3333 -.0594 .7260
16
Discussion and Questions• Students who completed EnvisionIT:
• Improved their IT Literacy Scores• Reported increased knowledge of how
to find jobs (all students)• Reported increased knowledge of
college information (SwD only)• Data analysis to continue for 2007-08
school year.• All schools receive intervention 2008-09.