Expectations and impact of retirement preparation programs...1 Expectations and impact of retirement...
Transcript of Expectations and impact of retirement preparation programs...1 Expectations and impact of retirement...
1
Expectations and impact of retirement preparation programs
Jiska Cohen-Mansfield
Irit Regev
The Herczeg Institute on Aging
Tel Aviv University
02 May 2011
2
Abstract
Work retirement is one of the chief life transitions that symbolize entering into a new period
in life. As one retires from work, one parts from a significant activity that affects many of
his\her life domains. The scientific literature portrays the transition from a worker's life to
retiree's life as a significant one, often accompanied by a decline in life-satisfaction, self-
evaluation, and quality of life (Atchley, 1989; 1998). Thus, having adequate coping skills in
the transition to retirement could affect the outcome of this transition. Despite the centrality
of this life-event, preparation towards it is often insufficient. Retirement preparation and
retirement counseling programs aim to enhance participants’ adaptation to retirement and
provide assistance in managing this new phase in life. Pre-retirement courses use a variety of
methods: cognitive, affective, and behavioral. Their main purpose is to form realistic
perception of retired life and reduce anxiety about retirement.
The current study focused on employees who approached retirement from work. We
conducted an investigation of the effect of retirement preparation programs on the retirees'
life satisfaction levels and coping skills. We examined expectations from retirement as well
as the immediate and relatively long-term effect of retirement preparation programs. The
main objective was to examine the contribution of retirement preparation programs to the
retiree. Several indicators of life satisfaction were examined: participant's coping skills, self-
evaluation, and sense of control over one's life. In order to portray participant's process of
adaptation to retirement, the time frame of the current study was from the date of the pre-
retirement course to 6 months post-course completion.
Data collection is still ongoing. We have collected pre-course questionnaires from 106 pre-
retirement workers who participated in 5 different courses, 79 post-course questionnaires, and
20 6-month follow-up questionnaires. Half of the sample were female; the mean age was 65
3
(median and mode were 66, range: 56-69); as for marital status, the majority (76%) were
married with children, Close to half the sample (49.5%) had post high school education. In
this report we present preliminary data on the retirement expectations and pre-retirement
wellbeing in this sample as well as changes following participation in the retirement
preparation courses.
4
Introduction
Theoretical background
Retirement is a major and fundamental life change that affects numerous areas. The transition
from a life of work to one of retirement has both practical and emotional implications (e.g.
coping with lower income, having numerous leisure hours, having to leave a familiar, well-
known world), and the responses to it are individual and unique. The professional literature
describes a wide range of responses to this fundamental change as well as differences in
intensity and style of response among individuals involved in the retirement process. The
research literature describes the following elements as exerting the most influence on each
individual’s response: the individual’s attitude towards retirement; the meaning of the role of
work for him; the level of control over the time of retirement; family status (married or not);
role as main caregiver for parents and/or spouse; the intergenerational relationship;
agreement between the couple regarding the time of retirement; social support system
(friends, relatives, neighbors); personality type and how the individual coped with previous
life transitions; socio-economic state and state of health (Mullins, Mushel, Cook & Smith,
1994; Atchley, 1998).
To our surprise, we discovered in literature search conducted in January 2010 Innovation.
that hardly any studies have been carried out to examine the impact of retirement-preparation
programs on retirees. The only study to examine the effect of a psycho-educational retirement
program was conducted in the context of a Ph.D. dissertation in Australia, but its results have
not yet been published in a professional journal (Glenn Gold, 2007). That study presented
positive results of an intervention program with a population of retirees involving six
sessions, with the participants in the program showing a decrease in depression indices, as
compared to a group of non-participants in the program. In light of the centrality of
5
retirement in the life of the older individual, preparation for retirement has the potential to
create a significant change in the retirement process and living experience following
retirement. This explains why it is so important to understand the impact that retirement-
preparation programs may have.
The importance of preparation for retirement. Retirement is very significant in the social,
familial and personal context. It involves a number of processes that underscore the need for
preparation towards it:
Retirement from work is often perceived to represent a transition to old age, a time
when people feel that economic, social and family security and stability may be
undermined.
The amount of free time available to the individual increases in retirement. This
change requires preparation and guidance to manage this free time (Schlossberg,
2004).
Retirement from work is a one-directional change that does not define future roles
and social tasks, and consequently causes feelings of uncertainty.
Many workers employ denial mechanisms, believing that retirement and old age will
not happen to them. The results of this denial can be seen in the absence of any
planning for the new life period, which limits the options and opportunities for
meaningful activities, all of which may damage feelings of self-worth (Monk, 1972).
spreparation program-etirementR
The goal of pre-retirement preparation and counseling is to ease the adjustment to the
transition and to help individuals plan their lives at this new life stage. The findings of a study
carried out by the Israel Central Bureau of Statistics shows that only 15 percent of Israel’s
6
population at or after retirement age have participated in pre-retirement preparation programs
(CBS, 2003). Most people do nothing to prepare themselves for this period in their lives. This
lack or insufficient preparation is explained by King (1985) as resulting from several factors:
Retirement as a social phenomenon is relatively new; society is work oriented and not
oriented towards periods of leisure and retirement; also, youth is glorified, whereas retirement
is identified with the entry into a period of old age and the end of life. Successful preparation
could help the retiring worker prepare for this new chapter in his life, help develop self-
awareness and realistic goals that are appropriate to this stage of life. The pre-retirement
preparation program is a training course designated for workers who are a year to two years
away from retirement.
The goals of specific retirement preparation programs can include the following:
1. To provide knowledge and practical information on a wide range of aspects
relevant to the retiree’s life during retirement.
The topics covered are varied and relate to the individual’s needs; they are selected
based on the type of course, its scope and orientation. The most common topics are:
financial resources and budgeting during retirement; a healthy emotional, cognitive
and physical lifestyle: in particular, proper nutrition and physical activity; legal issues
such as wills and inheritance; National Insurance Institute rights, pension rights and
issues related to taxation; the use of the computer and Internet after retirement;
volunteer organizations; leisure activities including studies; living arrangements.
2. To help the retirees overcome their anxiety regarding retirement and develop
a positive attitude towards it.
On the assumption that the transition process from the role of a worker to that of a
retiree can provoke a wide range of individual doubts and interpersonal conflicts, the
7
main goal is to help the retiree to no longer view his work as his main role in life and
to create various activities as a source of feelings of self-worth and satisfaction; to
accept necessary changes in one’s self-identity and develop a positive worldview; to
strengthen the inner locus of control and consolidate a sense of meaning in life.
3. To enrich the retiree’s personal and familial toolbox to develop coping skills
to deal with potential problems likely to come up during this period.
In this context, the programs expand knowledge, understanding and skills in a number
of areas: skills related to interpersonal communication, skills needed to manage the
family budget and in decision-making.
4. To reinforce family relations.
The retiree’s relationships with meaningful members of his family influence the
processes of adjustment to life after retirement. The goal of the preparation is to help
the retiree map out these people, their meaning for the person and major milestones in
the relationships.
5. To help consolidate programs for the management of life after retirement.
The consolidation of programs begins with planning. Planning must begin with the
perception of the self, an examination and investigation of one’s value system, needs
for quality of life and desires. The goal is to help the retiree set personal goals and
make decisions that will lead to the fulfillment of those personal goals (Sterns &
Kaplan, 2003; Sterns & Subich, 2005). At the second stage, the retiree builds a new
life plan that is appropriate to his personal desires and aspirations.
8
Satisfaction from life after retirement
Satisfaction from life after retirement is explained by various theoretical approaches. Two of
these are role theory and continuity theory. The role theory maintains that human behavior
is guided by expectations of the individual and others around him. These expectations shape
and direct the roles that people carry out in their lives, such as father, employee, friend, son,
etc. Based on this approach, the loss of one’s role as a result of retirement can cause a person
to feel anxiety and depression and can lead to a decrease in one’s self-esteem. The more
meaningful the work role is for the individual, the more stressful the feelings of loss will be.
Among the variety of roles, the role of worker is one of the most important because it defines
the individual’s daily activities, his status, and his peer group. In accordance with role theory,
retirement can undermine the older worker’s feeling of integration with society (Rosow,
1974). These negative feelings can adversely affect the retiree’s health and even increase the
risk of death. People who are most strongly invested in their jobs are at the greatest risk of
suffering from loss of role after their retirement.
Continuity theory focuses on the feelings of identity and self-image and maintains that these
remain stable, as a result of which life patterns remain stable too. The feeling of continuity
that accompanies the individual helps in life transitions. People at retirement and old age tend
to maintain an inner continuity (which includes positions and attitudes to the world) and
consequently maintain external continuity (which includes ties with the social environment
and maintenance of lifestyle) too. According to continuity theory, the period of retirement
provides an opportunity to maintain one’s previous lifestyle and life patterns. The transition
from a life of work to retirement does not have to harm the individual’s feeling of identity,
his social ties or feeling of productivity and self-image. Most retirees maintain continuity in
the goals of their lives, modes of action and coping, as well as of the fabric of their previous
9
social ties. Their retirement is consequently portrayed as a continued phase in their career,
one that they anticipate and are largely prepared for. Maintaining continuity is critical for the
retirees: Those who maintain their lifestyle or who view retirement as an opportunity to fulfill
previous goals (or who plan their retirement) will not feel any lessening in satisfaction with
their lives (Atchley, 1989).
When focusing on the assessment of life in an individual’s later years after retirement from
work, and when taking an interest in the individual’s ability to adjust to and cope with new
challenges, two distinct psychological mechanisms that help to maintain or achieve good
levels of satisfaction are involved. Adaptation is characterized in the literature as a natural,
automatic process which is at work when close to retirement; the emotional responses tend to
be intense while after a not-too-long period, the intensity of the negative reactions that
threaten the sense of well-being generally abates. The rate of adaptation to life events is
related to the type of event and its intensity (Loewenstein & Frederick, 1999). Identical
importance is attributed to coping, except that it – unlike adaptation – does not happen on its
own, but is rather characterized by an active process on the part of the individual facing
desirable or undesirable life challenges. From among the many coping mechanisms discussed
in the literature, a number of strategies were found to be of importance in the context of
subjective well-being, such as giving positive meaning to events, regulating emotions as well
as beliefs of a spiritual nature (Diener et al., 1999; Suh, Diener & Fujita, 1996).
11
The Research
This study investigates the effects of retirement-preparation programs on the retirees’ life
satisfaction levels and wellbeing. We examined expectations of retirement as well as the
immediate effect of retirement-preparation programs. In the future we plan to examine a more
long term effect.
Research questions:
1) What are participants’ expectations of pre-retirement courses?
2) How does participation in a pre-retirement course affect the participant?
Methods
Participants. 106 pre-retirement workers who participated in 5 different courses responded
to the pre-course questionnaire. 79 participants completed the post-course questionnaires, and
20 participants completed the 6-month follow-up questionnaires. Half of the sample were
female; the mean age was 65 (median and mode were 66, range: 56-69); as for marital status,
the majority (76%) were married with children, Close to half the sample (49.5%) had post
high school education. Characteristics of participants who completed the pre-course and the
post-course questionnaires are presented in Table 1.
Pre-retirement courses. The most common format for the programs is a series of sessions
spread out over a fixed period of time. The programs that were chosen for this study involved
six to seven days of eight hours each. The organizations sponsoring the courses were:
Maccabi Healthcare Services, Israel Aerospace Industries, HP Israel, the Israel Medical
Association, and Tel-Aviv University.
A comparison group. The study was planned with a comparison group of persons retiring
without taking a pre-retirement group. At this point we have not been able to obtain such a
11
group, though we are still making efforts to do so. In order to identify the comparison group
– a group of workers that did not participate in pre-retirement programs – we approached
both organizations that hold pre-retirement programs as well as to those that do not. The
identification of a comparison group turned out to be more difficult than expected. In those
organizations that hold these programs and whose employees participated in the study in the
context of the first group (the participants in the pre-retirement programs), it emerged that
most employees indeed participate in the program and only a small number do not. Of a
handful of employees, who were approached by representatives of the company’s human
resources department and who agreed to be interviewed, 106 were interviewed and a few
ultimately refused to participate in the study for reasons of lack of interest or anger at their
employer. In an attempt to find additional employees that did not participate in pre-retirement
courses, we turned to numerous additional organizations and companies such as Electra, the
University of Haifa, the Israel Railway, the Technion, Strauss, Egged, Meuheded Health
Services, the Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Ormat, Orbotech, Elisra, Elbit, El-Op,
Tnuva, Nesher, the Ministry of Defense, Bank Discount, Beit Shemesh Engines, Ltd., Ashot
Ashkelon Industries, Ltd., the Israel Craft Association. In most places, we received a negative
response for various reasons such as: We do not currently have any employees facing
retirement; we have no information regarding who is and who is not participating in courses;
our employees are young and are not at retirement age; we have difficulty finding people
willing to be interviewed; or a lack of motivation on the part of the human resources manager
to invest time and effort in the subject. Ultimately, we received the consent of Elisra, Egged
and the Israel Craft Association to help us locate workers who are not participating in pre-
retirement courses and who would agree to be interviewed for the study.
12
Assessments:
Independent Variables:
1. Socio-demographic variables include gender, age, education, marital status,
profession, income, and ethnicity.
2. Health and function variables.
Intervening Variables:
1. Planned retirement date and actual retirement date or, alternatively, the amount of
time the participant has before retiring or the time elapsed since retirement.
Dependent Variables:
1. Sense of Control was measured using the Self Mastery Scale, a questionnaire
developed by Pearlin and Schooler (1978), and translated to Hebrew by Hobfoll and
Walfish (1984) which concerns the extent to which one regards one's life-chances as
being under one's own control in contrast to being fatalistically ruled (Pearlin and
Schooler, 1978). It consists of a 7 statement index (for example "I have little control
over things that happen to me" or " What happens to me in the future mostly depends
on me") requiring Likert responses on a scale from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly
disagree). Cronbach's alpha coefficient of this measure was 0.88 based on Hobfoll and
Walfish's study (1984). A mean score for each participant was calculated, based on
his/her responses to the seven indexes, so that the scores ranged from 1-6, a higher
score indicating a greater sense of mastery over one's life.
2. Self Esteem was based on the Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale (1965) which was
translated into Hebrew by Hobfoll and Walfish (1984). The questionnaire includes 10
13
items (such as "I feel that I am a person of worth, at least on an equal plane as
others"). The participant was asked to rate each statement on a Likert scale with
responses ranging from 4 (strongly agree) to 1 (strongly disagree). Cronbach's alpha
coefficient of this measure was 0.95 based on Hobfoll and Walfish's study (1984). A
mean score for each participant was calculated, based on his/her responses to the ten
indexes, such that the scores ranged from 1-4, a higher score indicating greater self
esteem.
3. Life satisfaction was measured using the Satisfaction with Life Scale developed by
Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Griffin (1985). The scale consists of five questions
regarding one's perspective on his/her life requiring responses on a scale of 1
(strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). An Israeli study by Shmotkin and Lomranz
(1998) found the alpha coefficient for this study to be 0.76.
4. Depressed affect was measured using the five-item Geriatric Depression Scale (Hoyl
et al., 1999) which includes the following five questions: "Are you basically satisfied
with your life?”, “Do you often get bored?”, “Do you often feel helpless?”, “Do you
prefer to stay home rather than going out and doing new things?”, and “Do you feel
pretty worthless the way you are?”. Positive answers for depression screening are
“no” to the first question and “yes” to the other questions.. Alpha coefficient for this
study was 0.80 (Hoyl et al., 1999).
5. The Measurement of Meaning- (Osgood, Suci & Tannenbaum, 1957) utilizes the
semantic differentia to examine the meaning of retirement for participant. The
questionnaire asks the participant to position retirement on 7 point evaluation scales
ranging between two bipolar adjectives (good-bad; happy-sad). The scale consists of
eight items.
14
6. The Self-Anchoring Scale (SAS) assesses quality of life using a 10-point scale
ranging from 10 (best life) to zero (worst life). The tool was designed by Cantril and
is used widely in research (see Shmotkin, 1991).
Results
Background – Work experience. Participants have spent close to 30 years at work and
are currently working around 9 hours a day. Overall they are satisfied with their work (Table
2).
Background – wish to retire and reasons for retirement. Among the participants who
completed the pre-course questionnaire (n=106), about two thirds (68%) reported wanting to
retire, whereas close to a third, did not. (Table 2) The main reasons for retirement were:
retirement age (77%), and personal desire to retire (20%). Much smaller proportions reported
other reasons including forced retirement, wanting to rest, negative feelings about work,
organizational downsizing and medical reasons. Those who wanted to continue working
reported the following reasons for wishing to continue their employment, habit – difficulty
stopping, financial reasons, interest in work and liking their work, and using work as a way to
fill their leisure time (Table 3).
Expectations of retirement. Participants’ expectations of retirement are presented in
Table 4. The most common expectations were to enjoy themselves, such as travel, see
moves, or go to the theatre, devote time to spouse, children or grandchildren, spend time with
family, get involved with personal enrichment activities, such as reading or writing or study.
All of those were reported by close to 60% to 70% of participants. Lower rates were reported
for volunteering, relaxing, and improving quality of life, all checked by about 40% or
participants. A third of the participants expected to continue working. Only 6% had no
15
expectations. Family members’ expectations usually received similar rates of endorsement,
with some notable exceptions. Generally enrichment activities, such as reading, writing or
studying were expected by family only at about half the rate as endorsed by participants.
Similarly, volunteering, noted as an expectation by 44% of participants was anticipated by
only 20% of family members. Relaxing also was more likely to be reported as a personal
expectation (43%) than as a family one (28%). In contrast to these categories, spending time
with family was more often endorsed as a family expectation (65%) than as a personal one
(60%), though the difference is small.
Following participation in the course there were some changes in expectations of
retirement (Table 4). Changes that involved 10% or more of the participants are listed below:
there was a decrease in work expectations (from 36% to 26%) following the course, while
there was an increase in those who expected to enjoy themselves, such as through travel,
movies or theater from 73% to 84%. Participants were more likely to expect to volunteer
(50% to 60%) yet were less likely to expect to get involved in the community of public
affairs (18% to 8%).
Expectations from the course. The most highly endorsed expectation from the course
was to learn the rights of the retiree (Table 5), which was shared by over a half of the
participants. Between 40% and 50% of the participants had the following expectations: hear
about other’s ways of coping and get ideas for new activities, get support in coping with
retirement process, assist in developing a positive approach towards retirement, and receive
help in handling the financial aspects of retirement. We hope to explore the relationships
between participants’ background and expectations and between expectations and outcomes.
Immediate changes following the course. In table 6 we present summary scores for the
outcome variables, including cronbach alpha for the various scales and pre and post course
16
scores for all those who completed the questionnaire both before and after the course. Most
means are in the expected direction of greater wellbeing after the course as compared to
before the course. Three of these differences reached statistical significance: at post-course
measurement, participants reported (1) significantly higher levels of self-mastery after the
course (t62= 2.214, p<.05); (2) lower levels of depressive symptoms after the course (t59=
2.312, p<.05); and (3) more positive perceptions of their quality of life (t55= 2.986 p<.05),
compared to pre-course measurement.
Discussion
While this research is still ongoing, a few topics are highlighted by the results. First
there is a sizable proportion, about a third, of retiring persons who do not want to retire. This
stems mostly from Israel’s law of a compulsory retirement age. Those who wanted to keep
working had a variety of reasons for wishing to do so, including lifestyle, financial and
interest in work reasons. While some of those could potentially be handled with appropriate
counseling, such as the reason of habit, others may not. We plan to analyze the results of this
subgroup separately to see if there is a differential effect of the pre-retirement course on
those.
Second, even before participating in a course, these pre-retirees had a wide range of
aspirations for their retirement, with only 5% having no expectations at all. The most
commonly voted were hedonistic expectations of enjoying oneself in one way or another.
While a substantial proportion considered giving to society either through volunteering or
involvement in community work, it was much lower than the proportion endorsing activities
for one’s own enjoyment.
17
About a third planned to continue working after retirement. We plan to check whether
those are the participants who wanted not to retire.
There seems to be a reasonable congruence between family and participants on the
expectations from retirement, with the exception of enrichment activities, such as reading and
writing and study as well as volunteering which received much higher rates of endorsement
by participants than by family member.
18
References
Atchley, R. C. (1989). A continuity theory of normal aging. Gerontologist, 29, 183-190.
Atchley, R. C. (1998). Activity adaptations to the development of functional limitations and
results for subjective well-being in later adulthood Journal of Aging Studies, 12, 19–38.
Cantril, H. (1965). The Pattern of Human Concerns. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University
Press.
Diener E., Emmons R.A., Larsen R.J., & Griffin S, (1985). The satisfaction with life scale.
Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.
Diener, E., Suh, E.M., Lucas, R.E. & Smith, H.L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three
decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125 (2), 276-302
Glenn Goold, M.R. (2007). Retirement: Effects of a psychoeducational program. Doctorate
thesis. Bond University, Queensland, Australia.
Hobfoll, S. E., & Walfisch, S. (1984). Coping with a threat to life: A longitudinal study of
self concept, social support, and psychological distress. American Journal of
Community Psychology, 12, 87-99.
Hoyl, M. T., Alessi, C. A., Harker, J. O., Josephson, K. R., Pietruszka, F. M., and Koelfgen,
M. et al. (1999). Development and testing of a five-item version of the Geriatric
Depression Scale. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 47, 873-878.
Loewenstein, G., & Frederick, S. (1999). Hedonic adaptation: From the bright side to the
dark side. In: D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The
Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Monk, A. (1972). A social policy framework for pre-retirement planning. Industrial
Gerontology, 15, 63-70.
Mullins, L.C., Mushel, M., Cook, C. & Smith, R. (1994). The complexity of interpersonal
relationships among older persons: An examination of selected emotionally close
relationships. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 22(1/2), 109-130.
19
Osgood, C.E., Suci, G.J. & Tannenbaum, P.H. (1957). The Measurement of Meaning.
University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
Pearlin, L. I., & Schooler, C. (1978). The structure of coping. Journal of Health and Social
Behavior, 19, 2-21
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton
University Press.
Rosow, I. (1974). Socialization to Old Age. Berkeley. California: University of Califirnia
Press.
Schlossberg, N.K. (2004). Retire smart retire happy: Findings your true that in life.
Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
Shmotkin, D. (1991). “The role of time orientation in life satisfaction across the life span,”
Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 46, 243-250
Shmotkin, D., & Lomranz, J. (1998). Subjective well-being among Holocaust survivors: An
examination of overlooked differentiations. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 75, 141-155.
Sterns, H. L & Kaplan, J. (2003). Self-management of career and retirement. In: G.A. Adams
& T.A. Beehr (Eds.). Retirement: Reasons, processes and results (188-213). N.Y:
Springer.
Sterns, H. L & Subich, M.S (2005). Counseling for Retirement. In: Brown, S. D. & Lent,
R.W (Ed.). Career Development and Counseling, Putting Theory and Research to
Work. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Suh, E., Diener, E., & Fujita, F. (1996). Events and subjective well-being: Only recent events
matter. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1091-1102.
21
Table 1. Participants’ background characteristics
Pre-course N=106
Post-course N=80
Both pre-and post-course
N=65
Difference between pre-course and those who responded at
both times Age –mean (s.d.) 65 (2.5) 65 (2.4) 65 (2.4) .515 (102) NS
Women (%) 50% 45% 46.2 χ2
1=.994 NS
Place of birth
Israel (%) 38.8% 40% 49.2
Europe including the former soviet union (%)
48 29 29
Asia and N. Africa (%) 13.2 15.1 12.2
North America 1.9 1.4 1.5
South America 2.8 4.8 4.6
Marital status .9 .4 2.5
Single 2.8 2.5 3.1 χ2
4= 3.655NS
Married 36.3 33.8
Married with children 76.4 38.8 41.5
Divorced 8.5 12.5 10.8
Widowed 11.3 7.5 7.7
Number of children 2.8 (1.2) 3 (1.4) 3 (1.4) t100-2.343*
Education
Elementary school 1% .6 1.6
Partial high-school 4% 4.7 4.2 χ2
4= 4.452NS
High-school 17% 12.5 12.5
Post high-school 29% 31.3 31.3
University studies 50% 50 50
Main source of income
Salary 80% 63.9 74.1 64 χ2
3= .885NS
Pension
11% 16.1 12.5 16.9
National Insurance
Financial Assistance from family
1% 1.3 1.6 1.5
Other- combination 8% 17.6 7.8 15.4
21
Working status – yes 81% 68.8 78.5 66.2 χ2
1= .687NS
Place of residence
City 85% 79.7 χ2
4= 4.706NS
Religiosity
Secular 74% 76.4 76.2
Traditional 21% 17.5 17.5 χ2
2= 2.028NS
Religious 5% 6.3 6.3
Self report of health 5= excellent
3.36 (.95) 3.59 (.90) A/B 4.0 (.90) t102=2.882**
22
Table 2. Work background
Pre-course
N=106
Post-course
N=79
Pre-course scores of
participants who only
responded at pre-course
Pre-course scores of participants
who responded both at pre-and
post-course
Difference between pre-course and
those who responded at both
times Work Satisfaction N=102
1.45 (.57)
N=76
1.49 (.62)
N=39
1.31(.47)
N=63
1.54(.62)
t95.87=2.15, p<0.05
No. of years at work N=106
29.46(10.68)
N=79
26.96(11.13)
N=41
31.17(9.70)
N=65
28.38(11.19)
t93.94=1.36, n.s.
Daily hours at work N=75
9.14(2.91)
N=76
8.53(2.26)
N=26
8.94(2.91)
N=49
9.25(2.94)
t 73=.43, n.s.
Want to retire – yes N=71
67.6%
N=58
75.3%
N=40
60.0%
N=65
72.3%
χ2
1= 1.71, n.s.
Reasons for retirement
N=101 N=77 N=38 N=63
Retirement age 77.2% 79.2% 81.6% 74.6% χ2
1= 0.66, n.s. Forced retirement 5.9% 5.2% 7.9% 4.8% χ
21= 0.42, n.s.
To rest 5.0% 7.8% 7.9% 3.2% χ2
1= 1.12, n.s. Medical reason 2.0% 2.6% 0.0% 3.2% χ
21= 1.23, n.s.
Organizational downsizing
3.0% 1.3% 2.6% 3.2% χ2
1= 0.02, n.s. Personal desire to retire
19.8% 13.0% 18.4% 20.6% χ2
1= 0.07, n.s.
Negative feelings about current work
5%
Family 0.0% 2.6% 0.0% 0.0% -
Other reasons 2.0% 6.5% 0.0% 3.2% χ2
1= 1.23, n.s.
a” I am satisfied with my life” scored on a scale of 1-4, where 1 is “absolutely agree and
4=absolutely disagree
23
Table 3. Reasons for wanting to continue to work
Reason N
Financial 12
Use of leisure time 7
Habit and difficulty stopping 15
Interest in work, like working 10
Other – finish my obligations and I am still fit 2
24
Table 4. Retirement expectations
Family expectations Personal expectations
Those with both pre-
course and post course
scores
Total
sample
Those with both
pre-course and post
course scores
(n=62)
Total
sample
Post course %
Pre-course
%
Pre-course
%
Post course %
Pre-course %
Pre-course
%
Expectation
58.6 65.5 63 83.9 72.6 69 Enjoy: travel, movies, theatre 65.5 75.9 60 72.6 74.2 64 Devote time to with spouse,
children or grandchildren 60.3 72.4 65 69.4 67.7 60 Spend time with family 51.7 36.2 30 64.5 67.7 59 Enrichment activities (reading,
writing, painting, sculpture, photography) 32.8 31.0 25 59.7 62.9 58 Study
32.8 25.9 20 59.7 50.0 44 Volunteering
29.3 34.5 28 50.0 50.0 43 Rest and relax 46.6 43.1 43 48.4 38.7 41 Improve quality of life 24.1 27.6 26 25.8 35.5 33 Work
3.4 3.4 2 8.1 17.7 11 Involvement in community/public work 1.7 1.7 1 6.5 6.5 7 Other
6.9 5.2 4 3.2 3.2 6 No expectations
25
Table 5. Expectations from course
% Expectation
42 Support in coping with retirement process
20 Help cope with anxieties about retirement
42 Assist in developing a positive approach towards
retirement 31 Assist in obtaining tools that will help cope with the
social aspects of retirement 6 Assist in obtaining tools that will help cope with the
social aspects of retirement – develop new friendships 9 Assist in obtaining tools that will help cope with the
social aspects of retirement – Improve family
relationships
41 Help me handle the financial aspects of retirement
34 Help me cope with retirement in terms of activities
21 Help me cope with retirement in terms of activities-
leisure activity options 13 Help me cope with retirement in terms of activities –
gainful employment options 18 Help me cope with retirement in terms of activities-
volunteering options 25 Help me cope with retirement in terms of activities –
planning of leisure time 1 Help me cope with retirement in terms of activities –
other, trips 54 Learn about my rights as a retiree
49 Hear about other’s ways of coping and get ideas for
new activities
36 Increase awareness of difficulties around retirement
25 Find inner strengths
26
Table 6. Outcome variables
those with both pre-course and post
course scores
Total
sample
Paired t-test Post course
Pre-course
Pre-course
Scale Alpha #of items
Scale
t63=1.187,n.s. 3.90(.69) 3.81(.71) 3.79(.66) 1 – 6 .60 9 Feeling-retirement
t62= 2.214,
p<.05
4.56(.62) 4.37(.72) 4.39(.67) 1- 6 .73 6a
Self mastery scale
t63=.021, n.s. 3.37(.38) 3.37(.37) 3.38(.38) 1- 4 .77 11 Self esteem Scale
t63=1.08, n.s. 5.48(.93) 5.41(.95) 5.50(.86) 1 -7 .83 5 Life satisfaction
t63=1.726,
n.s.
3.95(.46) 3.86(.48) 3.78(.45) 1- 5 .53 11 Cognitive appraisal
t59= 2.312,
p<.05
.038(.11) .085(.17) .083(.18) 0=no; 1=yes .57 4 Geriatric Depression
Scaleb
t50=.518, n.s. 2.10(.83) 2.16(1.03) 2.22(1.18) 1-6 1 Negative feelings about retirement
t54=1.281,
n.s.
5.48(1.34) 5.31(1.32) 5.21(1.34) 1-7 .73 7 a The measurement of meaning
0-10 3 Self anchoring scale
t60=.055, n.s. 7.43(1.413) 7.44(1.44) 7.47(1.535) Past (5 years ago)
t61=.558, n.s. 7.77(1.2) 7.69(1.236) 7.86(1.201) Present
t55= 2.986
p<.05
7.83(1.18) 7.38(1.409) 7.38(1.705) Future (in 5 years)
aItem 5 was deleted because of low internal consistency with scale bItem 4 was deleted because of low internal consistency with scale