Breaking Through the Barriers to Student Learning Jake Burgoon NWO Symposium 2009.
Expectancy Violations Theory Theory Originator: Judee Burgoon Academic Area & Rank: Communication,...
-
Upload
bethanie-singleton -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
1
Transcript of Expectancy Violations Theory Theory Originator: Judee Burgoon Academic Area & Rank: Communication,...
Expectancy Violations Theory
Theory Originator: Judee Burgoon
Academic Area & Rank: Communication, Professor
Institutional Affiliation: The University of Arizona
Expectancy Violations Theory
D-Epistemology: Social Scientific/Objectivist Questions/Problems: What happens when
someone performs a nonverbal behavior that surprises you? How are perceptions of surprising and/or ambiguous nonverbal behavior related to interpersonal attraction, credibility, influence, and involvement?
D-Method: Experimental, Survey Data: Nonverbal human behaviors (e.g., physical
touch, physical space, eye gaze, facial gestures, body posture and lean)
Key Terms and Concepts
Proxemics: The study of people’s use of (interpersonal) space (an indicator or cultural norms)
Proxemic Zones (4)– Intimate Distance: 0-18 inches– Personal Distance: 18 inches to 4 feet– Social Distance: 4 to 10 feet– Public Distance: 10 feet +
Expectancy Violations Theory
Key Terms and Concepts
Expectancy: an expectation/prediction of nonverbal behavior
Violation Valence: process of assigning meaning, positive or negative, to the nonverbal behavior violation
Communication Reward Valence: outcome of the nonverbal violation. The sum of all positive and negative attributes (see conditions) that the violator brings to the table + the potential that the violator has to reward or punish us in the future
Expectancy Violations Theory
Theoretical Propositions: Nonverbal behavior is symbolic behavior whose
meanings are culturally-situated. People have expectations of and make unconscious
predictions about the nonverbal behavior that will occur in a given interpersonal situation. (expectancy)
When nonverbal expectations are violated, people search for and assign positive and/or negative meaning(s) to those violations. (violation valence)
When the meaning of a nonverbal violation is unclear, individuals will likely assign meaning that favors the violator’s influence in our lives (reward valence)
Expectancy Violations Theory
Practical Utility Increases non-verbal behavior awareness Gives practical advice on when it might be
advantageous and disadvantageous to be nonconformist wrt to nonverbal behavior– If you violate nonverbal expectations and/or use
nonverbal behaviors that are ambiguous, be sure the receiver likes you and/or that s/he believes you have something of value to offer them
– Otherwise CONFORM.
Expectancy Violations Theory
Strengths describes & explains simple, even elegant testable/falsifiable useful (practically, academically) historically-grounded and interesting
Weaknesses fails to predict reliably conclusions seem mundane
Theory Evaluation