Expanding the Pool

12
Expanding the Pool Characterizing LAGLIDADG Homing Endonuclease Orthologs

description

Expanding the Pool. Characterizing LAGLIDADG Homing Endonuclease Orthologs. Picking the ORF Regions to Use. OK active sites 50-60+ % homology Regions homologous to Ani Optimization Yeast expression, restriction Surface expression?. Intron. ORF. Expression & Relatedness. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Expanding the Pool

Page 1: Expanding the Pool

Expanding the Pool

Characterizing LAGLIDADG Homing Endonuclease Orthologs

Page 2: Expanding the Pool

Picking the ORF Regions to Use

Intron

ORF• OK active sites• 50-60+ % homology• Regions homologous to Ani

• Optimization– Yeast expression, restriction– Surface expression?

Page 3: Expanding the Pool

Expression & Relatedness

Page 4: Expanding the Pool

Expression problems

• Mutagenesis & directed evolution to regain & improve expression

• Glycosylation changes?– Tas Tin and Vin are predicted to be lacking

glycosylation in regions glycosylated in Pno, Ach, Hje, and Ani

– Tas and Tin are predicted to be glycosylated at DNA binding regions

• Poor surface expressers but otherwise OK

Page 5: Expanding the Pool

Target Determination• Target for Ani at intron/exon junctions

• By Homology…

• Central 4 are hard to predict

Ach cytb gene2423 bp

Exon 1 Exon 2Sequence Used

Ani apocytB (cobA) Gene2694 bp

Exon 1 Ani Exon2

TGAGGAGGTT T CT CTGTAAA

TGGGGAGG TTT TTCAGTATC

Page 6: Expanding the Pool

Binding Vs Ani Target &Predicted Targets

0.1 1 10 100 10000

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000Against Ani target

Ach

Hje

Pno

Tas

Tin

Vin

Ani (WT)

Ani (E148D)

concentration (nM)

MFI

(APC

)

0.1 1 10 100 10000

500

1000

1500

2000

2500Against own target

Ach

Hje

Pno

Tas

Tin

Vin

Ani (WT, against SCID)

Ani (E148D)

concentration (nM)

MFI

(APC

)

Conclusion: Tas, Tin, and Vin are not producing a viable surfac-expressed HE

Page 7: Expanding the Pool

CleavageAc

h

Hje

Pno

Ani

E148

D

Ach

Hje

Pno

Ach

Hje

Pno

Ani

37°C, against Predicted Targ 37°C, against Ani Targ

30°C, againstPredicted Targ

Target Only

Page 8: Expanding the Pool

What Changes Are Responsible?

• Variance at DNA-interacting domains– Insertions relative to Ani

Page 9: Expanding the Pool

Differences at DNA-Binding Regions

• 5Å interactions as spheres• Unchanged residues in green• Conserved Residues in Purple

+5, +9 & +10 positions (white) +2 & +5 positions (white)

Page 10: Expanding the Pool

Insertions• Directly change DNA-interacting regions (left)• May realign directly interacting regions (right)

– Harder to obtain by directed evolution alone

+5, +9 & +10 positions (white) -8 position (white)

Page 11: Expanding the Pool

Rosetta Predictions

• -8 A -> G• K24N & T29K

• D73N Conserved residue changed

Page 12: Expanding the Pool

Future Directions• Mutagenesis & directed evolution to improve surface

expression and/or activity• Comparing Ani ability to cleave predicted targets to the

corresponding enzyme’s cleavage to evaluate actual changes• Determine specificity with 1-off panels• DNA shuffling to generate hybrid HE’s• Begin to look at which changes are tolerated and which aren’t

Take-home Message• We can use homology searches to find functional homing

endonucleases with different targets• This can help us determine what AA changes affect what target

specificities