EXP1: Two-Interval Forced Choiceumassbostonbabylab.weebly.com/uploads/6/4/9/3/64936741/imrf20… ·...

1
Hiu Mei Chow & Vivian M. Ciaramitaro Changing contributions from shape contour, protrusion number and What makes a shape /baba/ to a child versus an adult? protrusion size in sound-shape correspondence Psychology Department, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA INTRODUCTION GENERAL METHOD EXP1: Two-Interval Forced Choice EXP2: Two-Alternative Forced Choice CONCLUSION Abbreviated References: Chen et al., (2016). Sci. Rep. Dukette & Stiles (2001). Dev. Sci. Nayar et al., (2015). J Exp Child Psychol Poirel et al., (2008). Dev. Psychol Poirel et al., (2011). PLoS ONE. Sound-shape correspondence is the association between abstract shapes and sounds. One example is the bouba/kiki associated with a sound like /bouba/ whereas a spikey shape is associated with a sound like /kiki/. Shape features like contour and the number and size of relevant visual features. The weight assigned to a particular visual feature can vary based on the perceptual processing style an adult adopts. We found that adults associated /i/ sounds with shapes having spiky contours and 3 small protrusions. Of these shape features, shape contour showed the strongest association. While 9-11 year-olds showed adult-like shape processing biases, 6-8 year-olds prioritized protrusion number, not shape contour. Yet, 6-8 year-olds could make associations based on shape contour when shape contour was highlighted by presenting round and spikey shapes side-by-side in a follow-up exp2. prioritized when making sound-shape correspondence by 6-8 year-olds versus adults. Importantly, shape processing biases can be altered by context such that children can resemble adults when the relevant shape features are highlighted. 1 Given literature suggesting that children adults , we hypothesized that children (e.g. number of protrusion more often) from adults. 2-5 1 2 3 4 5 Living Laboratory, Museum of Science, Boston Stimuli /baba/ /gaga/ /kiki/ /titi/ Set-up + /baba/ Which sound matches better with the shape? /kiki/ 4 sound pairs x 8 shapes x 2 = 64 trials Time 700ms 700ms 6s response + + /baba/ Time Which shape matches better with the sound? 4 shape pairs x 4 sounds x 4 = 64 trials 700ms 6s response Contour round vs. spikey Protrusion size large vs. small Protrusion number 7 vs. 3 Sound preference Count 6-8 (n=16) 9-11 (n=17) 18-35 (n=42) Shape preference Count Sound ba/ga vs. ki/ti 6-8 (n=15) 9-11 (n=18) 18-35 (n=43) ba/ga ba/ga ba/ga round spikey 1 2 3 0 6-8 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 Reaction Time (s) 1 2 3 0 Reaction Time (s) 9-11 18-35 6-8 9-11 18-35 6-8 9-11 18-35 6-8 9-11 18-35

Transcript of EXP1: Two-Interval Forced Choiceumassbostonbabylab.weebly.com/uploads/6/4/9/3/64936741/imrf20… ·...

Page 1: EXP1: Two-Interval Forced Choiceumassbostonbabylab.weebly.com/uploads/6/4/9/3/64936741/imrf20… · EXP1: Two-Interval Forced Choice EXP2: Two-Alternative Forced Choice CONCLUSION

Hiu Mei Chow & Vivian M. Ciaramitaro

Changing contributions from shape contour, protrusion number andWhat makes a shape /baba/ to a child versus an adult?

protrusion size in sound-shape correspondence

Psychology Department, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA

INTRODUCTION

GENERAL METHOD

EXP1: Two-Interval Forced Choice

EXP2: Two-Alternative Forced Choice CONCLUSION

Abbreviated References: Chen et al., (2016). Sci. Rep. Dukette & Stiles (2001). Dev. Sci. Nayar et al., (2015). J Exp Child PsycholPoirel et al., (2008). Dev. Psychol Poirel et al., (2011). PLoS ONE.

Sound-shape correspondence is the association between abstract shapes and sounds. One example is the bouba/kiki

associated with a sound like /bouba/ whereas a spikey shape is associated with a sound like /kiki/. Shape features like contour and the number and size of

relevant visual features. The weight assigned to a particular visual feature can vary based on the perceptual processing style an adult adopts.

We found that adults associated /i/ sounds with shapes having spiky contours and 3 small protrusions. Of these shape features, shape contour showed the strongest association. While 9-11 year-olds showed adult-like shape processing biases, 6-8 year-olds prioritized protrusion number, not shape contour. Yet, 6-8 year-olds could make associations based on shape contour when shape contour was highlighted by presenting round and spikey shapes side-by-side in a follow-up exp2.

prioritized when making sound-shape correspondence by 6-8 year-olds versus adults. Importantly, shape processing biases can be altered by context such that children can resemble adults when the relevant shape features are highlighted.

1

Given literature suggesting that children

adults , we hypothesized that children

(e.g. number of protrusion more often) from adults.

2-5

1 2 3

4 5

Living Laboratory, Museum of Science, Boston

Stimuli

/baba/ /gaga/ /kiki/ /titi/

Set-up

+

/baba/

Which sound matches better with the shape?

/kiki/

4 sound pairs x 8 shapes x 2 = 64 trials

Time

700ms

700ms

6s response

+

+

/baba/

Time

Which shape matches better with the sound?

4 shape pairs x 4 sounds x 4 = 64 trials

700ms

6s response

Contour round vs. spikey

Protrusion size large vs. small

Protrusion number 7 vs. 3

So

un

d p

refe

ren

ceC

ou

nt

6-8(n=16)

9-11(n=17)

18-35(n=42)

Shap

e p

refe

ren

ceC

ou

nt

Sound ba/ga vs. ki/ti

6-8(n=15)

9-11(n=18)

18-35(n=43)

ba/g

a

ba/g

a

ba/g

a

roun

dsp

ikey

1 2 30

6-8

0 1 2 30 1 2 3

Reaction Time (s)1 2 30

Reaction Time (s)

9-11

18-3

5

6-8

9-11

18-3

5

6-8

9-11

18-3

5

6-8

9-11

18-3

5