Excelsior Energy’s Mesaba Energy Project Update for the NM-SPG August 16, 2006.
-
Upload
parker-quiller -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Excelsior Energy’s Mesaba Energy Project Update for the NM-SPG August 16, 2006.
Excelsior Energy’sMesaba Energy Project
Update for the NM-SPG
August 16, 2006
Current Project Parameters
• Two 606MW IGCC units• ISDs 2011 and 2013• Primary Site- West Range
– POI---Blackberry 230kV Sub– Near Taconite, MN in Itasca County
• Alternate Site- East Range– POI---Forbes 230kV Sub– Near Hoyt Lake, MN in St. Louis County
• Designated as an Innovative Energy Project under special MN Legislation
MISO LGIP
Current Status
Transmission Progress to Date
– Transmission Concept Screening Study July 2003– East Range GO Analysis August 2004– East Range GI Request to MISO October 2004
• Queue # 38280-01, Project G477• First Unit 531/552MW ISD 2010• Network Resource Service
– G477 Feasibility Study Report March 2005• 6 months
– West Range GO Analysis May 2005– West Range GI Request May 2005
• Queue # 38491-01, Project G519• First Unit 600MW ISD 2010• Network Resource Service
Transmission Progress to Date
– G519 ‘Out of Queue’ Study Agreement August 2005– West & East Range Preliminary
GO Facilities Engineering Designs December 2005– West & East Range GO Analyses
Updates December 2005– G519 Feasibility Study Results December 2005
• 8 months
– G477 & 519 System Impact Study Results April 2006• 11 and 19 months
– G477 & 519 restudy of short circuit results July 2006– Second unit GI request submitted January 2006
• Designated G597
Transmission Progress to Date
– G597 Feasibility Study Report July 2006– G477&519 Facilities Studies underway July 2006
• MP has contracted to perform
– G597 SIS Agreement Executed August 2006
Note: Between July 2004 and December 2005 Excelsior performed six series of powerflow studies to evaluate GO facilities and network reinforcements
MISO Study Results
• Project G477 SIS (Forbes POI)
– Powerflow : No problems identified – Short Circuit : Several pre-existing over-dutied
breakers but no new ones caused by G477– Stability : All simulations are stable and within
damping criteria. No transient low voltage violations.– Deliverability Analysis: Failed
• Awaiting MISO study proposal to continue NRIS process• TSR submitted by Xcel for NITS (local capacity resource)
MISO Study Results• Project G519 SIS (Blackberry POI)
– Powerflow : Some issues identified during contingencies. Resolved with the addition of a new Boswell-Riverton 230kV line.
– Short Circuit : Several pre-existing over-dutied breakers delete [plus four new 115kV breakers at Nashwauk Sub due to G519]
– Stability : All simulations are stable and within damping criteria. No transient low voltage violations.
• New Boswell-Riverton 230kV line was included in these studies.
– Deliverability Analysis: Failed• Awaiting MISO study proposal to continue NRIS process• TSR submitted by Xcel for NITS (local capacity resource
MISO Study Results
• Project G597 Feasibilty Study (Blackberry POI)– Powerflow: numerous local contingency
violations identified• Not unexpected with both MEP II and new 800MW NE MN
unit included without any network upgrades
– Short Circuit: four Nashwauk 115kV breakers overdutied
Note: Modeling didn’t include proposed Minnesota Steel Plant or CAPX 2020 Projects
Other Mesaba Energy Project Progress
• Filing made 12/23/05 with MPUC for a PPA with Xcel Energy– under Innovative Energy Project Legislation
• Joint Siting/Routing Application made 6/16/06 for both units, all GO facilities, and gas pipeline.– Application accepted as complete 7/6/06.
Proposed GO Facilities
• G519: 9 mile double circuit 345kV steel pole structures, operated 230kV for MEP I
• G477: Two 345/115kV steel pole lines replacing existing 115kV structures for most of their 34 and 37 mile routings, with 345kV side operated 230kV for MEP I
West Range GO Facilities
West Range GO Routings
East Range GO Facilities
East Range GO Routings
Questions??