Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness

32
for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness Eelco den Heijer Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Transcript of Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness

Page 1: Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness

Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional

balance and liveliness

Eelco den HeijerVrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Page 2: Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness

Outline• Introduction

• Symmetry

• Compositional balance

• Liveliness

• Experiments & Results

• Conclusions

• Future work

Page 3: Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness

Introduction

• Unsupervised evolutionary art

• No human in the loop

• Aesthetic Measures

• fitness functions, computational aesthetics

• impact on `style’ of resulting image

• Global Contrast Factor, Ralph/ Ross Bell curve, Machado/ Cardoso, Benford Law

Page 4: Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness

Symmetry & Balance• Symmetry

• Ubiquitous - it’s everywhere...

• Important in design, architecture

• ‘Hard-wired’ in human visual system?

• It’s role in visual art is not straightforward

• Compositional Balance

• Important in graphic design & visual art

• Processing fluency (Reber)

Page 5: Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness
Page 6: Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness
Page 7: Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness

Motivation• Evo* paper 2011

• Multi-Objective Evolutionary art

• Multiple aesthetic measures

• Some combinations work well, some combinations do not (same `dimension’, opposing directions)

• Need for aesthetic measures that work on other ‘dimensions’ (e.g. symmetry)

Page 8: Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness

Research Questions

When using unsupervised evolution (i.e. without a human in the loop);

1.Is it possible to evolve symmetric images?

2.Is it possible to evolve `balanced’ images?

3.Do the aesthetic measures for symmetry and balance mix well with other aesthetic measures?

Page 9: Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness

Related work (1)• Several aesthetic measures in unsupervised

evolutionary art

• Machado & Cardoso (1998)

• Image complexity & Processing complexity

• Matkovic et al (2005)

• Global Constrast Factor

• Ross & Ralph (2006)

• Bell curve

• Several others

Page 10: Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness

Related work (2)

• Ngo et al (2000)

• Symmetry in GUI screens

• Bauerly and Liu (2005, 2008)

• Aethetic evaluation of symmetry in web pages

Page 11: Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness

Calculating Symmetry• Select two areas (depending on orientation)

• Mirror the second area (using the proper axis)

• Calculate difference in intensity values between all pixels in the two areas

• If difference is below 0.05 diff=1, else diff=0

Page 12: Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness

Symmetry? Relax...• Is too much symmetry a good thing?

• Finding a `sweet spot’ for symmetry

• We did not find a value for this `sweet spot’ in literature

• we used 0.8 in our experiments

Page 13: Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness

Compositional balance• Compute visual similarity (or distance) between

image regions

• Stricker & Orengo image distance function (1995)

• Image is `compressed’ to a feature vector

Page 14: Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness

Stricker & Orengo

Page 15: Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness

Calculating Balance

• Select two areas (depending on symmetry type)

• Determine feature vector for both areas

• Calculate Stricker & Orengo difference

Page 16: Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness

Liveliness• Using only symmetry would lead to a lot of

monochrome images (since they are perfectly symmetrical...)

• Same goes for compositional balance; two halves of a monochrome image have identical feature vectors

• So, we need additional constraints

• Not only symmetrical, but ‘lively’ too

Page 17: Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness

Liveliness: how?• A simple and naive measure for ‘interestingness’

• Our definition;interestingness = ‘having a high distribution of intensity values’

• Calculate entropy of intensity values (x=intensity value):

Page 18: Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness

Experiments

• Unsupervised

• No humans...

• Genetic programming

• `Pixel paradigm’

Page 19: Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness
Page 20: Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness
Page 21: Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness

Experiment Setup

1 Symmetry (bilateral) (+ liveliness)

2 Relaxed symmetry (+ liveliness)

3 Compositional balance (+ liveliness)

4 Multi-objective (NSGA-II); a) Symmetry (all directions)b) livelinessc) Global Contrast Factor

Page 22: Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness

1. Bilateral symmetry

Page 23: Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness

2. Bilateral symmetry (relaxed)

Page 24: Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness

3. Compositional Balance

Page 25: Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness

4.Combination (GCF + L + Sym)

Page 26: Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness
Page 27: Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness
Page 28: Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness
Page 29: Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness

Conclusions (1)• Our evolutionary art system has no

difficulty in evolving symmetric images

• Relatively `easy’ aesthetic measure (rapid fitness progression)

Page 30: Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness

Conclusions (2)• It is possible to control the `amount’ of

symmetry in an unsupervised evolutionary art system

• Compositional balance

• Images often ‘just‘ symmetrical

• Might need additional ‘penalty’

Page 31: Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness

Future work• Other distance functions for compositional

balance (e.g. based on texture)

• Experiments with symmetry using different representations (e.g. SVG)

• Good test for compositional balance measure

• Improve compositional balance measure

• Detect blobs, determine their weight, etc.

Page 32: Evolving art using measures for symmetry, compositional balance and liveliness

Thank you!Images and papers at

http://www.few.vu.nl/~eelco Questions?

[email protected]