Evolution of Thought in the Area of Management and Public ... of Thought.pdf · management...
Transcript of Evolution of Thought in the Area of Management and Public ... of Thought.pdf · management...
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
Evolution of Thought in the Area of
Management and Public Administration
Prof. A. SURYANARAYANA
1
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
OUTLINE Upon listening to my Lecture, you should be
able to:
Understand the setting in which Management Thought first developed
Describe the ways in which a Theory can be useful
Distinguish the various Schools of Management Thought
Understand the historical context in which the Dynamic Engagement Approach to Management Thought has been developed
2
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
EARLY THINKING
Early strategists –
1. Machiavelli (1531) “Discourses” – Italy – Republic of Florence
2. Chinese Philosopher, Sun Tzu >2000 years ago…”The Art of War”……
3. Mao Zewdong….Founder of People’s
Republic of China (1949)
3
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
WHY STUDY MANAGEMENT THOUGHT
Thought/Theory is a coherent group of assumptions put forth to explain the relationship between two or more observable facts
It represents perspectives with which people make sense of their experiences in the world
It provides a stable focus for understanding what we experience providing criteria for determining what is relevant
4
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
Evolution of Management Thought
CLASSICAL APPROACH
HUMAN RELATIONS APPROACH
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE APPROACH
OPERATION RESEARCH APPROACH
SYSTEM APPROACH
CONTINGENCY APPROACH
EXCELLENT COMPANIES APPROACH
RECENT TRENDS
5
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
Approaches 1 – 7 (1)
REPRESENT THE EVOLUTION OF MANAGEMENT THOUGHT FROM THE END OF 19th CENTURY TILL THE BEGINNING OF 90s
THERE IS A SPECIFIC CONTRIBUTION OF EACH APPROACH TO MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT
6
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
Approaches 1 – 7 (2)
ON THE OTHER HAND – THERE ARE SEVERAL GENERAL (COMMON) FEATURES OF EACH APPROACH
THE ORGANIZATION AS A SYSTEM AND THE PROCESS OF MANAGEMENT IS SEEN AS:
DETERMINISTIC
PREDICTABLE
THEY REFLECT THE MECHANISTIC CONCEPT OF THE UNIVERSE
THE UNIVERSE = GIANT MECHANISM
THE RELIABILITY OF THE MECHANISM IS DETERMINED BY THE RELIABILITY OF ITS SINGLE PARTS
THERE IS A RELATIONSHIP:
CAUSE EFFECT 7
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
Approaches 1 – 7 (3)
BOTH CLASSICAL NEWTON’S PHYSICS
AND
CLASSICAL THEORIES OF MANAGEMENT ARE BASED ON THE SAME MECHANISTIC CONCEPT OF THE UNIVERSE
8
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
Management Implications (1)
CLASSICAL APPROACH:
HUMAN RELATIONS AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE APPROACH:
MANAGEMENT
PRINCIPLES’
IMPLICATION
TAYLOR, FAYOL, WEBER
EFFECTIVE
FUNCTIONING
OF THE
ORGANIZATION
EMPLOYEE
MOTIVATION
EFFECTIVE
FUNCTIONING
9
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
Management Implications (2)
OPERATION RESEARCH APPROACH:
SYSTEM APPROACH:
CRITICAL
PATH
EFFECTIVE ACCOMPLI-
SHMENT OF THE GOAL
INPUTS TRANSFORMATION OUTPUT
10
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
Management Implications (3)
CONTINGENCY APPROACH:
EXCELLENT COMPANIES APPROACH:
ANALYSIS OF THE
CONTINGENCY
FACTORS IN THE
ENVIRONMENT
EFFECTIVE
FUNCTIONING
OF THE
ORGANIZATION
MANAGERIAL
IMPLICATION
OF EIGHT
PRINCIPLES
EFFECTIVE
FUNCTIONING
OF THE
ORGANIZATION
11
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
The Result of Mechanistic Concept
CLASSICAL MECHANISTIC MODEL OF THE ORGANIZATION (THE “OLD” MODEL)
TYPICAL FEATURES:
SPECIALIZATION
HIERARCHY
CENTRALIZATION, ETC.
TOP MANAGEMENT
MIDDLE MANAGEMENT
FIRST-LINE MANAGEMENT
12
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
Mechanistic Concept
ADVANTAGES: RELATIVELY RELIABLE CONTROL
CLEAR DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY
SPECIALIZED (SKILLED) WORKFORCE, etc.
DISADVANTAGES: LOW FLEXIBILTY
THE ORGANIZATION IS “TOO FAR” FROM THE CUSTOMER
THE ORGANIZATION IS LESS COMPETITIVE IN THE COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENT
13
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
Recent Trends
CLASSICAL PHYSICS HAS BEEN ELIMINATED BY THEORY OF RELATIVITY AND QUANT MECHANICS
CLASSICAL PRINCIPLE OF DETERMINISTIC PREDICTABILITY HAS BEEN ELIMINATED BY CHAOS THEORY
CHAOS THEORY DEALS WITH THE NON-LINEAR SYSTEMS (non-linear behavior)
ORGANIZATIONS AS INSTITUTIONS ARE TYPICAL NON-LINEAR SYSTEMS
THE REASON: PEOPLE IN THE ORGANIZATION
RESULT: CHAOS IS NOT A SYNONYM OF INSTABILITY
14
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
Management & Chaos Theory
OBJECTIVES:
1. DESCRIBE THE BASIC FEATURES OF CHAOS THEORY
2. SPECIFY THE CHAOS THEORY IMPACT ON MANAGEMENT
15
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
Chaos Theory
ACCORDING TO CHAOS THEORY THERE ARE:
1. PASSIVE CHAOS = EQUILIBRIUM = MAXIMAL ENTROPY
2. ACTIVE CHAOS = SYSTEM IS “FAR FROM THE EQUILIBRIUM”
16
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
Laws of Thermodynamics
ENTROPY = THE TERM THAT COMES FROM PHYSICS (THERMODYNAMICS)
THE FIRST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS SAYS:
MASS AND ENERGY IN THE UNIVERSE ARE CONSTANT
(Mass and energy cannot be “made”, produced or destroyed. They can be only changed for another form)
THE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS SAYS:
MASS AND ENERGY CAN BE CHANGED ONLY IN ONE WAY (EX: FROM USABLE TO NON-USABLE)
MAX. ENTROPY = DISORDER = ALL THE ENERGY HAS BEEN CHANGED FOR NON-USABLE
17
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
Chaos Theory
CHAOS THEORY DEALS WITH THE ACTIVE CHAOS
RESULT:
SYSTEMS ARE NOT NECESSARILY HEADING TO THE EQUILIBRIUM
IN THE STAGE WHEN THE SYSTEM IS FAR FROM THE EQUILIBRIUM THE NEW SYSTEM SPRINGS UP
CHAOTIC SYSTEM THAT IS FAR FROM THE EQUILIBRIUM – THE NEW SYSTEM – REACHES A HIGHER LEVEL OF ORDER
ORDER OUT OF CHAOS
18
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
Managerial Implication
HERE IS YOUR LIMIT
GROWTH
TIME
19
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
Managerial Implication
TIME
GROWTH
20
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
TAYLOR’S LEGACY
Principles of Scientific Management 1. SPECIALIZE ALL JOBS AND TASKS, REDUCING WORK
TO ITS SMALLEST AND SIMPLEST ELEMENTS;
2. ESTABLISH PRECISE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES SO THAT WORK IS PERFORMED IN THE SAME WAY EVERY TIME. CLOSELY MONITOR WORKERS TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE;
3. CONTAIN AND COMPARTMENTALIZE ALL RESPONSIBILITY, DECISION-MAKING, DISCRETION, AND POWER EXCLUSIVELY WITH THOSE IN AUTHORITY;
4. ENSURE THAT EACH WORKER IS WELL-MATCHED TO THE SPECIFIC PRE-DETERMINED REQUIREMENTS OF THE FUNCTION ASSIGNED. 21
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
TAYLOR’S LEGACY
Principles of Scientific Management 5. ELIMINATE ALL DUPLICATION OF EFFORT, REQUIRING
THAT TASKS ARE PERFORMED EXCLUSIVELY BY THOSE TO WHOM THEY ARE ASSIGNED.
A CHILLING PROPHECY
“WE ARE GOING TO WIN AND THE INDUSTRIAL WEST IS GOING
TO LOSE. THERE IS NOT MUCH YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT BECAUSE THE REASONS FOR YOUR FAILURE ARE WITHIN YOURSELVES. YOUR FIRMS ARE BUILT ON THE TAYLOR MODEL. EVEN WORSE, SO ARE YOUR HEADS”.
Konosuke Matsushita, Founder Matsushita Electric, Ltd.
22
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
Frederick W. Taylor (1856-1915)
Development of a true Science of Management
Scientific Selection of Workers
Scientific Education and Development of Workers
Intimate and friendly cooperation between management and Workers
23
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
Contributions and Limitations
[+ ]
Production Miracle is one legacy
Efficiency Techniques for non-industrial settings ranging from fast-food service to t he training of surgeons
[-]
Fear of Layoffs
Productivity leading to exploitation
Shaded labor-management relations
24
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
Classical Organization School
Henry Fayol (1841-1925)
14 General Principles of Management 1. Division of Labor;
2. Authority;
3. Discipline;
4. Unity of Command;
5. Unity of Direction;
6. Subordination of Individual Interest to the Common Good;
7. Remuneration;
8. Centralization;
9. The Hierarchy;
10.Order;
11. Equity;
12. Stability of Staff;
13. Initiative;
14. Esprit de Corps 25
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
MAX WEBER – BUREAUCRACY (1864-1920)
Carefully controlled regulation of activities
Strictly defined hierarchy governed by clearly defined regulations and lines of authority
Rationality for objectives and activities
Explicitly spelled out division of labor
Emphasis on technical competency
Merit-based performance evaluations
26
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
BUREAUCRACY
Efficiency of Operations
Predictable and Productive Operations
Has the promise for advancing the formation of huge corporations such as Ford
[-]
1. Bureaucracy Busters e.g., GE and Xerox
2. Replacement of Organization Charts
3. Innovation and Creativity through Teams, Projects, and Alliances
27
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
The Behavioral School
Organization is People
Failure to achieve efficiency and harmony
Unpredictable or unexpected behavior
Dealing with “people-side” of firms
Insights from Sociology and Psychology
Human Relations Movement
Hawthorne Experiments (1924-1933)
Elton Mayo (18880-1949)
Hawthorne Effect
Concept of ‘Social Man’
28
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
Others
Abraham H. Maslow’s Need Hierarchy
Herbert Simon (Late 50s)
Douglas McGregor {Complex Person} Theory X and Y
29
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE SCHOOL
World War-II Great Britain’s OR Teams consisting of Mathematicians, Physicists, and other Scientists
Application of OR to problems in Industry
Formalization of OR Procedures leading to Management Science School
McNamara….Ford Company (50s and 60s)
Crunching the Numbers…..Whiz Kids
Values and Variables…Simulations
Objective basis for making a decision
30
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
SYSTEMS APPROACH
Key Concepts
Sub-systems
Synergy
Open and Closed Systems
System boundary
Flow
Feedback
31
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
THE CONTINGENCY APPROACH
Charles Kindleberger – Economist – “it all depends”
Situational approach
Identification of techniques that best contribute to the attainment of goals in a particular situation, under particular circumstances, and at a particular time
32
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
Entering an Era of Dynamic Engagement
All the theories of 20th Century are not enough as new environment is not some set of fixed, impersonal forces
Dynamic and complex web of people interacting with each other
Backdrop of rapid change and profound rethinking about 21st Century organizations
Blurred boundaries of cultures and nations
Global Village Concept
Scope of international and intercultural relationships
Time pressures and intensity of organizational relationships ----- a new approach is needed
33
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
NEW ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
Ethics and Social Responsibility
Globalization and Management
Inventing and Reinventing Organizations
Cultures and ‘Multiculturisms’
Quality
………….Remember to change with the times
34
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007
THANKS FOR YOUR PATIENCE
35