EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSEggbaker/reference/modeling/week3/...EVOLUTION OF DECEIT...

21
EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSE: H t+1 = H t e r-aPt P t+1 = H t (1-e -aPt )

Transcript of EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSEggbaker/reference/modeling/week3/...EVOLUTION OF DECEIT...

Page 1: EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSEggbaker/reference/modeling/week3/...EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSE: Ht+1 = Hte r-aPt Pt+1= Ht(1-e-aPt) A QUESTION POSED: Could

EVOLUTION OF DECEIT ASA SECOND-LINE DEFENSE:

Ht+1 = Hter-aPt

Pt+1= Ht(1-e-aPt)

Page 2: EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSEggbaker/reference/modeling/week3/...EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSE: Ht+1 = Hte r-aPt Pt+1= Ht(1-e-aPt) A QUESTION POSED: Could

A QUESTION POSED:

Could a mutant fake marker invade ofpopulation of “honest” caterpillars?

Page 3: EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSEggbaker/reference/modeling/week3/...EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSE: Ht+1 = Hte r-aPt Pt+1= Ht(1-e-aPt) A QUESTION POSED: Could

REFINE QUESTION

Could a mutant fake marker invade ofpopulation of “honest” caterpillars thatemploy hiding as a first line ofdefense?

Page 4: EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSEggbaker/reference/modeling/week3/...EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSE: Ht+1 = Hte r-aPt Pt+1= Ht(1-e-aPt) A QUESTION POSED: Could

SCENARIO

Parasitoid

Host

Detection

Acceptance

Hiding

False-marking

Page 5: EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSEggbaker/reference/modeling/week3/...EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSE: Ht+1 = Hte r-aPt Pt+1= Ht(1-e-aPt) A QUESTION POSED: Could

THE CHROMOSOME:2 loci, 4 alleles

Hide

• High• Medium• Low• No

False Mark

• Strong• Medium• Weak• None

Page 6: EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSEggbaker/reference/modeling/week3/...EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSE: Ht+1 = Hte r-aPt Pt+1= Ht(1-e-aPt) A QUESTION POSED: Could

THE CHROMOSOME

A binary string that represents thephenotype that expresses a specificstrategy:e.g. 1 1 0 01 1 translates into good hider0 0 translates into no mark

Page 7: EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSEggbaker/reference/modeling/week3/...EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSE: Ht+1 = Hte r-aPt Pt+1= Ht(1-e-aPt) A QUESTION POSED: Could

AN EXAMPLE

• Strategy 0010 has a value of 2i.e. 0*1 + 1*2 + 0*4 + 0*8

• Strategy 1001 has a value of 9 i.e.1*1 + 0*2 + 0*4 + 1*8

Page 8: EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSEggbaker/reference/modeling/week3/...EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSE: Ht+1 = Hte r-aPt Pt+1= Ht(1-e-aPt) A QUESTION POSED: Could

SIMULATION

• Deterministic• Some proportion of hosts are found

based upon relative hiding value• Some proportion of found hosts

are attacked based upon markstrength and wasp rules

Page 9: EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSEggbaker/reference/modeling/week3/...EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSE: Ht+1 = Hte r-aPt Pt+1= Ht(1-e-aPt) A QUESTION POSED: Could

UNLIKE PREY-

Hosts don’t disappear after attackbut they may change identity

Page 10: EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSEggbaker/reference/modeling/week3/...EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSE: Ht+1 = Hte r-aPt Pt+1= Ht(1-e-aPt) A QUESTION POSED: Could

FITNESS IS DETERMINEDBY:

• Escape from parasitoids• Cost of defense

Hiding≥ false-mark

Page 11: EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSEggbaker/reference/modeling/week3/...EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSE: Ht+1 = Hte r-aPt Pt+1= Ht(1-e-aPt) A QUESTION POSED: Could

THREE SCENARIOS:

Parasitoids are hard wired (frequencyindependent)

Parasitoids are flexibleParasitoid’s flexibility evolves

Page 12: EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSEggbaker/reference/modeling/week3/...EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSE: Ht+1 = Hte r-aPt Pt+1= Ht(1-e-aPt) A QUESTION POSED: Could

STARTING POPULATION

S M W N S M W N S M W N S M W N0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

FREQ

UENC

Y

MARK

HIDE HIGH MEDIUM LOW NO

S: STRONGM: MEDIUMW: WEAKN: NONE

Page 13: EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSEggbaker/reference/modeling/week3/...EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSE: Ht+1 = Hte r-aPt Pt+1= Ht(1-e-aPt) A QUESTION POSED: Could

FREQUENCY INDEPENDENT

S M W N S M W N S M W N S M W N0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

FREQ

UENC

Y

MARK

H IDE HIGH MEDIUM LOW NO

S: STRONGM: MEDIUMW: WEAKN: NONE

Page 14: EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSEggbaker/reference/modeling/week3/...EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSE: Ht+1 = Hte r-aPt Pt+1= Ht(1-e-aPt) A QUESTION POSED: Could

PARASITOID ACCEPTANCEPLASTICITY

• Within generation as number of“parasitized” hosts increases

• Among generations as fake markerphenotypes change in frequency

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

Proportion of "Parasitized" Hosts

Ten

den

cy t

o

"Su

perp

ara

siti

ze"

Page 15: EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSEggbaker/reference/modeling/week3/...EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSE: Ht+1 = Hte r-aPt Pt+1= Ht(1-e-aPt) A QUESTION POSED: Could

PLASTIC PARASITES

S M W N S M W N S M W N S M W N0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

FREQ

UENC

Y

S: STRONGM: MEDIUMW: WEAKN: NONE

MARK

H IDE HIGH MEDIUM LOW NO

Page 16: EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSEggbaker/reference/modeling/week3/...EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSE: Ht+1 = Hte r-aPt Pt+1= Ht(1-e-aPt) A QUESTION POSED: Could

THE NEW GA

• Actually two GA’s, one for the hostpopulation and one for the parasitoidpopulation

• The parasitoid chromosome has one genefor sensitivity to mark strength and anotherfor sensitivity to mark frequency in theenvironment

Page 17: EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSEggbaker/reference/modeling/week3/...EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSE: Ht+1 = Hte r-aPt Pt+1= Ht(1-e-aPt) A QUESTION POSED: Could

PARASITES EVOLVE

FIT(p) =a Hfh + Ffhop, n + Dfdop, d

n=1

N

ÂÊ Ë Á ˆ

¯

1+ a Hto

+Fop,n

n=1

N

Âto

+F 1 - op, n( )

n=1

N

Âtr

+Dop, d

n=1

N

Âto

+D 1- op, d( )

n=1

N

Âtr

Ê

Ë

Á Á Á

ˆ

¯

˜ ˜

Page 18: EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSEggbaker/reference/modeling/week3/...EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSE: Ht+1 = Hte r-aPt Pt+1= Ht(1-e-aPt) A QUESTION POSED: Could

PARASITOID’S PAYOFF

ACCEPT• FIT(a | p) = fp -to

• FIT(a | h) = fh - to

REJECT• FIT = -tr

Page 19: EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSEggbaker/reference/modeling/week3/...EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSE: Ht+1 = Hte r-aPt Pt+1= Ht(1-e-aPt) A QUESTION POSED: Could

PARASITES EVOLVE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 80

100

200

Genotypes (sensitivity >>)

Frequ

ency

fp = 0.1fhtr = 0.1 to

fp = 0.6 fhtr = 0.6 to

x mark = 4.9

x mark = 2.5

Page 20: EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSEggbaker/reference/modeling/week3/...EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSE: Ht+1 = Hte r-aPt Pt+1= Ht(1-e-aPt) A QUESTION POSED: Could

AN INSIGHT

False marking as a second line ofdefense only spreads through theprey population under limitedcircumstances

(our test is conservative!)

Page 21: EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSEggbaker/reference/modeling/week3/...EVOLUTION OF DECEIT AS A SECOND-LINE DEFENSE: Ht+1 = Hte r-aPt Pt+1= Ht(1-e-aPt) A QUESTION POSED: Could

HOST DYNAMICSgn t + 1( ) = gn t( ) 1 - m( )

where m = gnan1

gnn =1

N

 aT

rmT

bn,sÊ Ë

ˆ ¯ q

where an = hide genotype n, mT

= fraction of marked hosts in population T,

bn = false - mark genotype n,r = parasitoid responses = parasitoid response shape pararameterq = proportion of hosts encountered per epoch