Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muñoz

download Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muñoz

of 153

Transcript of Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muñoz

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    1/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    170

    I N THE CI RCUI T COURT OF THE 11TH J UDI CI AL CI RCUI T I N AND FOR MI AMI - DADE COUNTY, FLORI DA

    GENERAL J URI SDI CTI ON DI VI SI ON

    CASE NO. : 11- 037237 CA 23

    REYNALDO MUNOZ, SR. , as survi vi ng f at herand as Per sonal Repr esent at i ve of t he Est at eof REYNALDO MUNOZ, J R. , and CARI DAD LOPEZ,as survi vi ng mot her ,

    Pl ai nt i f f s,vs.

    J EFFREY DAVI S, i ndi vi dual l y and as parent

    of mi nor chi l d, J ACK DAVI S, and YASMI NEDAVI S, i ndi vi dual l y and as par ent of mi norchi l d, J ACK DAVI S,

    Def endant s.____________________________________________/

    73 West Fl agl er St r eet , Mi ami , Fl or i da, Monday, 1: 30 p. m. , December 29, 2014.

    The hear i ng i n t he above- ent i t l ed cause r esume

    bef or e The Honor abl e St anf or d Bl ake, Ci r cui t Cour t

    J udge, af t er t he l uncheon r ecess.

    APPEARANCES:

    ROBERTS & DURKEE, P. A. , by DAVI D DURKEE, Esqui r e, and

    ALVAREZ RODRI GUEZ, by J UAN L. ALVAREZ, Esqui r e, and J OEL S. PERWI N, P. A. , by J OEL S. PERWI N, Esqui r e, At t or neys f or Pl ai nt i f f s .

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    2/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    171

    1 APPEARANCES CONTI NUED:

    2 LAW OFFI CES OF KUBI CKI , DRAPER, by PETER H. MURPHY, Esqui r e, and

    3 WI LLI AM BI SSETT, Esqui r e, At t or neys f or Def endant s.

    4 THE MCGRANE LAW FI RM, by

    5 MI LES A. MCGRANE, Esqui r e, At t or ney f or J ack Davi s.

    6ALSO PRESENT: Yasmi ne Davi s

    7 J ef f r ey Davi s, Esq. J ack Davi s.

    8

    I NDEX9

    10 WI TNESS CROSS REDI RECT RECROSS

    11 Det ect i ve Nye- Gonzal ez

    12 ( By Mr . Murphy) 216( By Mr . Dur kee) 172 ( Cont i nued) 221

    13

    14 WI TNESS DI RECT CROSS REDI RECT

    15 Dr . J ul i an Munoz- Di az16 ( By Mr . Dur kee) 228

    ( By Mr . Murphy) 23717

    18 WI TNESS DI RECT CROSS REDI RECT

    19 Dr . Ronal d Wr i ght

    20 ( By Mr . Durkee) 242 276( By Mr . Murphy) 255

    21

    WI TNESS DI RECT CROSS REDI RECT22

    Wayne Wi l l i ams23

    ( By Mr . Durkee) 284 29524 ( By Mr . Murphy) 293

    25

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    3/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    172

    1 THE COURT: Thank you ever yone.

    2 MR. DURKEE: May I proceed, Your Honor ?

    3 THE COURT: Yes.

    4 Ther eupon:

    5 DETECTI VE NYE- GONZALEZ

    6 r esumed.

    7 CROSS EXAMI NATI ON CONTI NUED

    8 BY MR. DURKEE:

    9 Q. Good af t er noon, Det ect i ve.

    10 A. Good af t ernoon.

    11 Q. Fi r st of al l , t o go back j ust f or a

    12 moment , I j ust want t o make sur e we ar e cl ear

    13 because we ki nd of got caught up wi t h what t he exact

    14 l anguage was, but at t he t i me t hat you, quot e,

    15 "suspect ed t hat no cr i me has been commi t t ed" maybe

    16 i n t he f i r st hour or t wo of your i nvest i gat i on, t he

    17 onl y evi dence you had was J asmi ne' s st at ement ,

    18 correct?

    19 A. No.

    20 Q. What el se di d you have?

    21 A. Wel l , I t al ked t o t he of f i cer s. I had

    22 been t hr ough t he back of t he resi dence, sever al

    23 t hi ngs had t r anspi r ed.

    24 Q. But what speci f i cal l y wer e you r el yi ng on

    25 t o f or m a concl usi on wi t hi n t he f i r st hour or t wo

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    4/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    173

    1 t hat , quot e, "you suspect ed t hat no cr i me had been

    2 commi t t ed, " ot her t han t he st at ement t hat we tal ked

    3 about because I want t o l i st t hem speci f i cal l y, not

    4 j ust wal ki ng ar ound t he pr emi ses?

    5 When you wal ked ar ound t he pr emi ses, what

    6 evi dence di d you per cei ve or see t hat l ed you t o

    7 t hi s concl usi on t hat you suspect ed t hat no cr i me had

    8 been commi t t ed?

    9 A. Wel l , I was t her e t o conduct a deat h

    10 i nvest i gat i on and t hat ' s what I was doi ng. I spoke

    11 wi t h t he of f i cer who had al r eady spoken t o Ms.

    12 Davi s, t ook t hat i nt o consi der at i on. What I had

    13 was, at t hat poi nt what I t hought was an armed

    14 bur gl ar y and a f ami l y def endi ng themsel ves.

    15 Q. Ri ght . So t he onl y t hi ng you had at t hat

    16 poi nt was J asmi ne' s st at ement , cor r ect ?

    17 A. Wel l , l i ke I sai d, I wal ked t hr ough. I

    18 had been t o t he back. I was absor bi ng al l of t he

    19 i nf or mat i on t hat I was t ol d at t hat t i me. So I

    20 don' t know i f I can l i st t hi ng by t hi ng. I ' m

    21 absor bi ng i nf or mat i on. I am l ooki ng ar ound. I am

    22 hear i ng. I am t al ki ng.

    23 Q. Wel l , ot her t han absor bi ng t hi ngs by

    24 osmosi s, but i f you woul d f or t he Cour t , pl ease l i st

    25 any - - and you can l i st anyt hi ng. I don' t car e i f

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    5/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    174

    1 you l i st t hem al l or one or t wo, but I know we

    2 t al ked about J asmi ne' s st at ement , what el se wer e you

    3 r el yi ng on? Can you t el l t hi s Cour t anyt hi ng el se

    4 speci f i cal l y t hat you wer e r el yi ng on t o come up

    5 wi t h t he concl usi on t hat , quot e, unquot e, "You

    6 suspect ed t hat no cr i me had been commi t t ed"?

    7 A. Then I guess we are goi ng t o have t o go

    8 t hr ough my repor t and I can t el l you t he t hi ngs I

    9 di d and t he st eps t hat I t ook. I ' m not sur e t her e

    10 i s anot her way.

    11 Q. Okay.

    12 A. Okay? So i ni t i al l y I get a phone cal l , or

    13 I am t ol d by anot her det ect i ve who r ecei ved a phone

    14 cal l what we wer e r espondi ng t o. So I absor bed

    15 t hat . I don' t t hi nk i t was by osmosi s, but I

    16 absor bed t hat .

    17 Q. What about t hat f i r st conver sat i on or

    18 f i r st i nf or mat i on t hat you der i ved f r om t hat t hat

    19 you r el i ed on t o come up wi t h a concl usi on t hat ,

    20 quot e, unquot e, "You suspect ed t hat no cr i me had

    21 been commi t t ed"?

    22 A. Wel l , I was t ol d t hat a mal e was st eal i ng

    23 a wave runner f r om t he resi dence and was shot by t he

    24 homeowner . Lat er - -

    25 Q. So t hat st at ement t her e t hat i s somet hi ng

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    6/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    175

    1 you r el i ed on?

    2 A. Wel l , of cour se, Mr . Dur kee.

    3 Q. Okay. That ' s one st at ement .

    4 A. Ever yt hi ng t hat I di d, al l t he t hi ngs t hat

    5 I hear d, ever yone t hat I t al ked t o, anyt hi ng t hat I

    6 saw, I r el i ed upon.

    7 Q. Of cour se.

    8 A. And I st i l l r el y upon t oday.

    9 Q. Of cour se. And t hat ' s what I ' m t r yi ng t o

    10 f i gur e out . You sai d wi t hi n t he f i r st - -

    11 A. No, I di dn' t say wi t hi n t he f i r st

    12 anyt hi ng. You ar e t he one t hat sai d wi t hi n t he

    13 f i r st . Now you gi ve a t i me sl ot . When I ar r i ved, I

    14 was conduct i ng a deat h i nvest i gat i on. That ' s what I

    15 was doi ng.

    16 Q. Ma' am, I am not t r yi ng t o bi cker wi t h you.

    17 What I am t r yi ng t o say i s you t ol d me - - I t hi nk

    18 t hat i s how i t pl ayed out . I sai d t hat when he l ef t

    19 t he pr emi ses, J ack l ef t t he pr emi ses wi t h hi s

    20 f at her , whi ch I t hi nk we' ve est abl i shed was wi t hi n

    21 t he f i r st hour or so of t he i nvest i gat i on, you t ol d

    22 t hi s Cour t t hat at t hat t i me when he l ef t t he

    23 pr emi ses, you di dn' t t hi nk i t was t hat bi g of a deal

    24 because he was a wi t ness at t hat poi nt , he wasn' t a

    25 suspect .

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    7/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    176

    1 A. Wel l , l et ' s st op r i ght t her e because I

    2 di dn' t know t hat he l ef t unt i l af t er he l ef t and

    3 came back. So I di dn' t know t hat . So I di dn' t make

    4 any det er mi nat i ons at t hat t i me.

    5 Q. I ' m not t r yi ng t o put wor ds i n your mout h.

    6 We can go back t o t he t r anscr i pt because I marked

    7 i t . You were t he one who vol unt eered t o me. I

    8 di dn' t cr eat e t hi s . I di dn' t tal k about thi s . I

    9 sai d, "When he l ef t t he scene, he was a wi t ness t o a

    10 cr i me, " and you sai d t o us, "No, I don' t t hi nk he

    11 was a wi t ness or a suspect or anyt hi ng el se because

    12 at t hat t i me I di dn' t suspect t hat any cr i me had

    13 been commi t t ed. "

    14 That i s what you sai d. So what I am

    15 t r yi ng t o f i nd out i s when he l ef t t he cr i me scene

    16 wi t h hi s f at her , unaccompani ed by any pol i ce

    17 of f i cer s, and you had f or med t hat bel i ef i n your

    18 head, not me, t hat you had suspect ed t hat no cr i me

    19 had been commi t t ed, what I am t r yi ng t o f i gur e out

    20 i s what ar e t he pi eces of evi dence t hat you wer e

    21 r el yi ng on t o f or m t hat concl usi on so ear l y i n t he

    22 case?

    23 I mean, you under st and how an

    24 i nvest i gat i on goes. You go out and you gat her

    25 evi dence. You gat her al l of t he evi dence and t hen

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    8/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    177

    1 f or m concl usi ons. You have done t hat i n f r ont of

    2 t he Cour t and you have done t hat t oday.

    3 You were t he one t hat t ol d us t hat when he

    4 l ef t t he pr emi ses, t hat he was a wi t ness or a

    5 suspect because you had sai d, quot e, unquot e, "You

    6 suspect ed t hat no cr i me had been commi t t ed. "

    7 So now I ' m t r yi ng t o f i nd out , at t hat

    8 t i me you made t hat concl usi on, what evi dence - - and

    9 you under st and evi dence, r i ght ?

    10 A. Excuse me?

    11 Q. Do you under st and evi dence?

    12 A. Do I underst and evi dence?

    13 Q. Do you under st and t hat you' r e supposed t o

    14 gat her evi dence dur i ng an i nvest i gat i on?

    15 A. I bel i eve I do, Mr . Dur kee.

    16 Q. So I t hi nk i t ' s a si mpl e quest i on. When

    17 you made t hat concl usi on t hat you had suspect ed t hat

    18 no cr i me had been commi t t ed, what evi dence wer e you

    19 r el yi ng on t o make t hat concl usi on?

    20 A. What I was r el yi ng on was t he i nf or mat i on

    21 I had r ecei ved f r om t he ot her of f i cer s, f r om t he

    22 ot her - - al l t he ot her of f i cer s on t he scene, f r om

    23 t he st at ement t hat was gi ven t o t he ot her of f i cer

    24 whi ch was t hen t r ansl at ed t o me, what I saw when I

    25 wal ked ar ound t he pr emi ses. That ' s what I was

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    9/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    178

    1 r el yi ng on.

    2 Q. Let ' s t ake each one of t hose t hi ngs. The

    3 st at ement s t hat had been pr ovi ded t o you up unt i l

    4 t hat poi nt by t he ot her of f i cer s r eal l y was t hat

    5 J asmi ne had gi ven a st at ement and t hat was

    6 communi cat ed t o you, cor r ect ?

    7 A. That ' s one of t he t hi ngs, Yes.

    8 Q. You had not r evi ewed t he 911 t ape at t hat

    9 poi nt , cor r ect ?

    10 A. I don' t know what poi nt I r evi ewed i t . I

    11 can l ook at my not es and see, but I di d r evi ew t he

    12 911 t ape.

    13 Q. Ri ght , t hat was l at er on.

    14 A. Do you want me t o l ook at t hat ?

    15 Q. That was l at er on. That was at 5: 55 p. m.

    16 I t ' s on Page 6.

    17 But somet i me bef or e t hat i s when t he f ol ks

    18 came back and you conf r ont ed Mr . Davi s about t he

    19 f act t hat you guys had suspect ed t hat hi s son was

    20 t he shoot er . That ' s on Page 4.

    21 A. Okay.

    22 Q. So i f you l ook at i t chr onol ogi cal l y, you

    23 di dn' t r evi ew t he 911 t ape at t hat poi nt . What I am

    24 sayi ng i s, ot her t han t al ki ng t o Of f i cer - - because

    25 you di d wr i t e t hi s chr onol ogi cal l y. I mean, i t

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    10/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    179

    1 seems l i ke chr onol ogi cal l y by t he t i me you

    2 conf r ont ed J ef f r ey Davi s and hi s son, t hat you

    3 suspect ed t hat hi s son had been t he shoot er . The

    4 onl y t hi ng t hat you r eal l y had done i s t al k t o

    5 Of f i cer Zabi el i nsky and t aken t he cal l back at t he

    6 of f i ce t hat t here was a r obbery and somebody got

    7 shot ?

    8 A. Wel l , Mr . Dur kee, i f you want t o r ead on

    9 Page 4, i t says Ser geant Mal ot t i s t he one t hat

    10 advi sed Mr . Davi s t hat t her e was a suspi ci on t hat

    11 J ack was t he one who shot t he f i r ear m. I di dn' t

    12 advi se hi m.

    13 Q. Yes, but he had al r eady gone of f t he

    14 pr emi ses at t hat poi nt , cor r ect ?

    15 A. I bel i eve so.

    16 Q. Ri ght .

    17 A. I t was acci dent al l y omi t t ed f r om my

    18 r epor t . I don' t see i t her e. So I don' t know t he

    19 t i me and Sergeant Mal ot t woul d have t o answer t o t he

    20 t i mes.

    21 Q. Ri ght , because i t ' s not ment i oned anywher e

    22 i n your i nvest i gat i ve r epor t t hat you al l owed t he

    23 shoot er t o go of f t he pr emi ses wi t h hi s f at her , a

    24 l awyer , and get consul t ed and came back t o t he

    25 pr emi ses. That ' s nowher e i n your r epor t , r i ght ?

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    11/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    180

    1 A. I t i s not i n my r epor t , but J ack and hi s

    2 f at her l ef t t he scene. I t ' s not i n my r epor t . That

    3 i s cor r ect . I t was acci dent al l y omi t t ed. I di dn' t

    4 al l ow anyone t o do t hat .

    5 Q. So I am cor r ect t o say at t hat poi nt t her e

    6 was no physi cal evi dence t hat you gat hered t hat you

    7 r el i ed on, cor r ect ?

    8 A. Mr . Dur kee, I ' m havi ng a di f f i cul t t i me

    9 under st andi ng what i t i s t hat you' r e t r yi ng t o get

    10 f r om me. I t ol d you t hat I was di spat ched t her e. I

    11 went t her e. I am conduct i ng a deat h i nvest i gat i on.

    12 I di dn' t - - I di dn' t al l ow J ack t o l eave. I can' t

    13 answer t o t hat .

    14 Q. Ri ght , but you wer e t he l ead i nvest i gat or ,

    15 correct?

    16 A. Under my super vi sor , Ser geant Mal ot t , t hat

    17 i s cor r ect .

    18 Q. And ver y ear l y i n t he case, ver y ear l y i n

    19 t he case you as t he l ead i nvest i gat or had come t o

    20 t he concl usi on t hat you t ol d us her e i n Cour t t hat

    21 you, quot e, unquot e, "suspect ed t hat no cr i me had

    22 been commi t t ed"?

    23 A. That ' s cor r ect .

    24 Q. What I am t r yi ng t o f i nd out , and I t hi nk

    25 i t ' s a l egi t i mat e i nqui r y, i s ot her t han t he

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    12/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    181

    1 st at ement by J asmi ne Davi s t o Of f i cer Zabi el i nsky,

    2 what ot her obj ect i ve evi dence wer e you r el yi ng on t o

    3 make t hat concl usi on? Ot her t han wal ki ng around t he

    4 scene and seei ng a body t hat ' s on t he gr ound, ot her

    5 t han wal ki ng around t he scene and seei ng a wave

    6 r unner , ot her t han wal ki ng ar ound t he scene and

    7 seei ng a shot gun on t he t abl e, ot her t han wal ki ng

    8 ar ound t he scene seei ng J asmi ne si t t i ng out i n t he

    9 backyar d, ot her t han wal ki ng t he scene and seei ng

    10 pol i ce t ape, ot her t han wal ki ng ar ound and seei ng

    11 ot her pol i ce of f i cer s wal ki ng ar ound, i n your mi nd

    12 what were t he i t ems of evi dence t hat you were

    13 r el yi ng on t o come up wi t h t he concl usi on t hat you

    14 suspect ed t hat no cr i me had been commi t t ed ear l y on

    15 i n t hi s i nvesti gat i on?

    16 A. As I ' ve t ol d you bef or e, al l of t he

    17 i nf or mat i on t hat I had up unt i l t hat poi nt .

    18 Q. Wher e shoul d I cut t hat cut of f on your

    19 r epor t ? When you say, "up t o t hat poi nt , " wher e do

    20 I f i nd t hat ?

    21 A. I don' t know. You' r e t he one who i s

    22 det er mi ni ng t her e i s a poi nt . I ' m not sur e. You' r e

    23 det er mi ni ng t her e i s a poi nt . You sai d t her e was an

    24 hour or t wo hour s. I ' m not r eal l y sur e. I ' m not

    25 r eal l y sur e what you' r e - - t hat t her e was a t i me

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    13/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    182

    1 mar ker . I r esponded t o t hi s scene t o conduct a

    2 deat h i nvest i gat i on and t hat ' s what I di d.

    3 Q. You ar e supposed t o f ol l ow t he evi dence,

    4 r i ght ?

    5 A. I conduct ed a deat h i nvest i gat i on.

    6 Q. Wai t a mi nut e. I ' m aski ng you a quest i on.

    7 A. Of cour se we f ol l ow t he evi dence.

    8 Q. Now, you t ol d me t hat J ef f r ey Davi s and

    9 hi s son had gone of f t he pr emi ses and t hen when t hey

    10 came back, t hat ' s when you or , bet t er , Ser geant

    11 Mal ot t had conf r ont ed J ef f r ey and J ack wi t h t he

    12 i nf or mat i on t hat you suspect ed J ack was t he shoot er ,

    13 cor r ect ? We' ve est abl i shed t hat , r i ght ?

    14 A. That we suspect ed, yes, t hat i s cor r ect .

    15 Q. So I t hi nk we now have a t i me st amp. We

    16 know t hat when you conf r ont ed J ef f r ey and J ack wi t h

    17 your suspi ci ons, t hey had al r eady been of f t he

    18 pr emi ses, cor r ect ?

    19 A. I bel i eve so, yes.

    20 Q. And I t hi nk on your r epor t we have t hat at

    21 about - - somet i me bet ween 4: 45 and 4: 50 when t he

    22 medi a r el at i ons peopl e showed up, r i ght ? Accor di ng

    23 t o your chr onol ogy i n your r epor t , cor r ect ?

    24 A. That i s cor r ect .

    25 Q. So you ar r i ved on t he scene at 4: 00,

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    14/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    183

    1 correct?

    2 A. That i s cor r ect .

    3 Q. And af t er you ar r i ve on t he scene - - f i r st

    4 of al l , you had got t en a cal l t o advi se you what was

    5 goi ng on and t o go t o t he scene. That was somet hi ng

    6 t hat happened wi t h you. And t hen you t al ked t o

    7 Of f i cer Zabi el i nsky and he t ol d you what J asmi ne had

    8 t ol d hi m. Ther e was f i r e r escue on t he scene. You

    9 not ed t hat . You had gone and conduct ed a

    10 wal k- t hr ough of t he r ear of t he r esi dence. You

    11 i nt r oduce your sel f t o J asmi ne.

    12 And t hen event ual l y, af t er 4: 45 but bef or e

    13 4: 50, you guys conf r ont ed Mr . Davi s and J ack t hat

    14 you f el t t hat he had been t he shoot er . I s t hat

    15 r i ght ?

    16 A. That ' s r i ght .

    17 Q. So t hat was t he ext ent of your

    18 i nvest i gat i on up t o t hat poi nt , r i ght ?

    19 A. Up t o t hat poi nt , yes.

    20 Q. Now, once Mr . Davi s was conf r ont ed wi t h

    21 t hi s i nf or mat i on, he t ol d you t hat f r om t hat poi nt

    22 f or war d, hi s cr i mi nal l awyer , Ms. Rat zan, woul d

    23 speak f or t he f ami l y, cor r ect ?

    24 A. He di dn' t t el l me. He t ol d Ser geant

    25 Mal ot t t hat Ms. Rat zan wi l l be r epr esent i ng and

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    15/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    184

    1 speaki ng on t hei r behal f .

    2 Q. I n your ver nacul ar , t hat ' s basi cal l y

    3 cal l ed l awyer i ng i t up, r i ght ?

    4 A. I guess you coul d say t hat .

    5 Q. Have you hear d t hat t er m bef or e?

    6 A. I have.

    7 Q. And t hat ' s when a cr i mi nal def endant says,

    8 "I ' m not t al ki ng t o you any f ur t her . I want t o t al k

    9 t o my l awyer , " r i ght ? That ' s what i t means by

    10 l awyer i ng i t up, r i ght ?

    11 A. I guess you coul d gi ve i t t hat connot at i on

    12 or you coul d j ust say, " I have a l awyer who i s goi ng

    13 t o be r epr esent i ng me. " Peopl e get l awyer s al l t he

    14 t i me.

    15 Q. Af t er Mr . Davi s, who i s a l awyer , t ol d you

    16 t hat , you knew you coul d not i nt er vi ew J asmi ne or

    17 J ack unt i l t he l awyer got t here and you had t o t al k

    18 t hr ough t he l awyer . I s t hat r i ght ?

    19 A. That i s cor r ect . She was goi ng t o be

    20 maki ng a st at ement .

    21 Q. Now, at t hat poi nt you had Ms. Davi s' s

    22 st at ement t hat she f i r ed a weapon, and you had

    23 r easonabl e suspi ci on t o bel i eve based on t he wound

    24 t o J ack' s f ace, and maybe some ot her col l at er al

    25 evi dence, t hat J ack was i n f act t he shoot er . So you

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    16/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    185

    1 had t wo possi bl e scenar i os. You had t he f act t hat

    2 J asmi ne may have shot , Mr s. Davi s, or you had t hi s

    3 mi nor chi l d, J ack, who coul d have f i r ed t he weapon.

    4 You had t wo conf l i ct i ng ver si ons at t hat poi nt . You

    5 suspect ed J ack, but you al so had t hi s ver bal

    6 st at ement t hat J asmi ne had f i r ed t he weapon.

    7 So at t hat poi nt t her e ar e t est s t o

    8 det er mi ne def i ni t el y i f somebody shot a weapon. I s

    9 that true?

    10 A. Not def i ni t el y, but t her e ar e gunshot

    11 r esi due t est s t hat can be admi ni st er ed, yes.

    12 Q. And t hat ' s somet hi ng t hat ' s r egul ar cour se

    13 of busi ness, i f you want t o det er mi ne - - t hat i s t he

    14 t est t hat you t r y and admi ni st er t o t r y t o det er mi ne

    15 who shot t he weapon, cor r ect ?

    16 A. That i s one of t he t est s, yes.

    17 Q. And you never di d t hat i n t hi s case,

    18 r i ght ?

    19 A. A gunshot r esi due t est was not conduct ed,

    20 no.

    21 Q. And as t he l ead det ect i ve, i f you want ed

    22 t o f i ght f or a gun r esi due t est , you coul d have

    23 f ought f or t hat , cor r ect ?

    24 A. Wel l , I had an Assi st ant St at e At t or ney

    25 t here and we di scussed i t and we deci ded t hat i t was

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    17/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    186

    1 not goi ng t o happen.

    2 Q. Di d you f eel t hat was t he appr opr i at e

    3 t hi ng t o do, not t o do a gunshot r esi due t est ? Was

    4 t hat your deci si on or di d you j ust def er t o t he

    5 St at e At t or ney?

    6 A. I t hi nk i t was mor e of a gr oup deci si on

    7 and t he Davi s f ami l y decl i ned and we accept ed t hat

    8 we ar en' t goi ng t o do gunshot r esi due.

    9 Q. I t wasn' t t hat you t ot al l y di d not

    10 consi der i t , t he f ami l y actual l y r ef used t o do i t ?

    11 A. They decl i ned, yes.

    12 Q. Who decl i ned t hat on behal f of t he f ami l y,

    13 wasn' t t hat J ef f Davi s?

    14 A. I wi l l have t o l ook at my not es.

    15 Q. Anyway, t hey r ef used, cor r ect ?

    16 A. Yes.

    17 Q. Now, al so you were operat i ng under t he

    18 bel i ef based on t hi s st at ement t hat you had der i ved

    19 f r om Of f i cer Zabi el i nsky t hat J asmi ne Davi s had

    20 pr of f er ed t o hi m t hat t her e was a gun i nvol ved,

    21 correct?

    22 A. I ' m sor r y, you wi l l have t o say t hat

    23 agai n.

    24 Q. Based on t he st at ement t hat you had

    25 gat her ed f r om Of f i cer Zabi el i nsky t hat came f r om

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    18/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    187

    1 J asmi ne Davi s, you bel i eved t hat t he person t hat was

    2 t her e t r yi ng t o st eal t he wave runner possi bl y had a

    3 gun. I s t hat t r ue?

    4 A. Yes.

    5 Q. And, i n f act , you r equest ed pol i ce di ver s

    6 t o t he scene, I t hi nk i t was about 4: 55, about an

    7 hour af t er you got t her e t o st ar t l ooki ng f or a gun,

    8 correct?

    9 A. That i s cor r ect . They wer e cal l ed.

    10 Q. And t he r eason you' r e l ooki ng f or a gun

    11 t hat Mr . Reynal do Munoz, J r . may or may not have had

    12 i s t hat woul d have been a ver y i mpor t ant pi ece of

    13 evi dence. I f t he f ami l y i s sayi ng I shot t hi s

    14 f el l ow because he had a gun, you obvi ousl y want ed t o

    15 t r y and f i nd t hat gun t o see whet her you coul d

    16 suppor t t hei r st or y or not , cor r ect ?

    17 A. Yes, we want ed t o f i nd i t i f we coul d f i nd

    18 i t , yeah.

    19 Q. You never f ound i t , di d you?

    20 A. No, we di d not f i nd a gun.

    21 Q. I n f act , when t he st at ement was pr of f er ed

    22 t hr ough t he at t or ney, t her e was no pr of f er t hat t he

    23 gun may be i nsi de of t he f r ont compar t ment . I s t hat

    24 true?

    25 A. I woul d have t o l ook back at t he

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    19/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    188

    1 st at ement . I ' m not sur e. I can l ook at i t , t hough.

    2 No, t hat i s not i n t he i ni t i al st at ement

    3 f r om At t or ney Rat zan.

    4 Q. So at t hat poi nt , nobody r eal l y t ol d you

    5 t o l ook i n t he f r ont compar t ment f or a gun, cor r ect ?

    6 A. At t hat poi nt , no.

    7 Q. At t hi s poi nt , based on your anal ysi s of

    8 t he evi dence and wi t h your exper i ence, you woul d

    9 agr ee wi t h me t hat mor e l i kel y t han not he never had

    10 a gun and i t was r eal l y, i f anyt hi ng, t hi s r ecei ver

    11 devi ce t hat she may have per cei ved t o be a gun. I s

    12 t hat r i ght ?

    13 A. I bel i eve t hat now, yes.

    14 Q. Now t hat we ar e on t he pr of f er , t he

    15 pr of f er t hat was made and t hat was supposedl y comi ng

    16 f r om J asmi ne Davi s was t he f ol l owi ng, t hat she was

    17 i nsi de of t he r esi dence wi t h her chi l dr en. She

    18 obser ved a man near a st orage cl oset i n t he r ear of

    19 her r esi dence. She approached t he man and began

    20 yel l i ng as she cal l ed 911. I s t hat r i ght ?

    21 A. That ' s cor r ect so f ar .

    22 Q. At t hat t i me, she t ol d J ack, her son, t o

    23 get t he gun whi ch i s kept under t he mast er bed,

    24 r i ght ? So f ar so good?

    25 A. So f ar so good. You' r e r eadi ng i t .

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    20/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    189

    1 Q. J asmi ne t hen t ol d t he man t hat she had a

    2 gun and i n response t he man sai d he had a gun, t oo.

    3 When J ack came out si de wi t h t he gun, he

    4 shot t he man. J asmi ne admi t t ed t hat she or i gi nal l y

    5 l i ed about i t and at t hi s t i me - - I ' m not r eadi ng i t

    6 pr eci sel y, but event ual l y she al so t ol d you at t hi s

    7 t i me t her e was possi bl y anot her - - a second man on a

    8 wave r unner ci r cl i ng t he ar ea, cor r ect ?

    9 A. You' r e r eadi ng i t . You' r e l eavi ng out

    10 some par t s but , yeah, you' r e r eadi ng i t . That ' s

    11 exact l y what i t says.

    12 Q. I n t hat pr of f er she never t ol d t he pol i ce

    13 t hat she t hought t he man was dr oppi ng of f a boat ,

    14 correct?

    15 A. You j ust r ead i t . Nope, i t doesn' t say

    16 anyt hi ng about t hat .

    17 Q. And you agr ee wi t h me t hat , i f anyt hi ng,

    18 her f ear der i ved f r om t he f act t hat t he guy sai d he

    19 had a gun, t oo, cor r ect ?

    20 A. No, I woul dn' t agr ee wi t h you on t hat .

    21 Q. I n t hat pr of f er does she ever say she saw

    22 a gun?

    23 A. I don' t bel i eve i t says t hat , no.

    24 Q. And we t al ked about i t , she never st at ed

    25 i n t hat pr of f er t hat t he per cei ved gun was i nsi de of

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    21/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    190

    1 t he f r ont compar t ment , cor r ect ? We al r eady t al ked

    2 about t hat .

    3 A. Agai n, Mr . Dur kee, you r ead i t and i t

    4 di dn' t say anyt hi ng about t hat .

    5 Q. Ma' am, I am not t r yi ng t o aggr avat e you.

    6 You sound l i ke you' r e get t i ng aggr avat ed. I am j ust

    7 t r yi ng t o do my j ob j ust l i ke you' r e t r yi ng t o do

    8 your j ob, okay?

    9 A. I ' m j ust r ef er r i ng back t o t he f act t hat

    10 you r ead i t and - -

    11 Q. You don' t need t o be smar t wi t h me. I am

    12 j ust t r yi ng t o do my j ob, okay?

    13 A. Okay. So am I .

    14 Q. Exact l y.

    15 At t hat t i me, At t or ney Rat zan al so advi sed

    16 you t hat t he f ami l y was not goi ng t o cooper at e any

    17 f ur t her because, A, t hey wer e t o di st r aught t o be

    18 i nt er vi ewed and, B, t hey needed t o st udy f or f i nal s,

    19 r i ght ?

    20 A. She sai d t hat t he f ami l y i s t o di st r aught

    21 t o be i nt er vi ewed at t hat t i me and t he chi l dr en wer e

    22 pr epar i ng f or t hei r f i nal s, t hus we agr eed t o meet

    23 at a l at er dat e.

    24 Q. And, i n f act , t he f ami l y and At t or ney

    25 Rat zan had agr eed t o meet wi t h you t he f ol l owi ng

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    22/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    191

    1 Monday, whi ch woul d have been t wo days af t er t he

    2 shoot i ng, t o come down and gi ve t hei r st at ement s,

    3 correct?

    4 A. That was t he dat e on t he 23r d, yes.

    5 Q. That was t he pl an, r i ght ?

    6 A. Yes, t hat was t he pl an.

    7 Q. But t hat pl an di dn' t get ef f ect uat ed

    8 because t hey never showed up, r i ght ?

    9 A. I t was cancel ed. I bel i eve t hey spoke

    10 wi t h Ser geant Mal ot t and i t was cancel ed.

    11 Q. I n f act , you never t ook Mr s. Davi s' s

    12 st at ement unt i l mont hs l at er . I s t hat cor r ect ?

    13 A. That ' s cor r ect .

    14 Q. And you di dn' t t ake J ack Davi s' s st at ement

    15 unt i l November , whi ch was si x mont hs af t er t he

    16 i nci dent , cor r ect ?

    17 A. That ' s cor r ect .

    18 Q. And one of t he r easons you di dn' t - - I

    19 t hi nk you sai d on di r ect , one of t he reasons you

    20 di dn' t push t o have J ack gi ve a st at ement was

    21 because t he ki ds had f i nal s and you had t o make

    22 accommodat i ons, r i ght ?

    23 A. I don' t r ecal l sayi ng t hat .

    24 Q. Do you r emember back i n your deposi t i on

    25 you sai d t he t wo ki ds had f i nal s and t he f ami l y was

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    23/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    192

    1 di st r aught or somet hi ng l i ke t hat ?

    2 A. Okay, yes. That ' s what i t says her e.

    3 That ' s why we di dn' t i nt er vi ew t hem t hat day.

    4 Q. So you were del ayi ng your homi ci de

    5 i nvest i gat i on t o t ake t he st at ement of t he per son

    6 who f i r ed t he weapon because t hese ki ds had t o t ake

    7 some t est s?

    8 A. I wasn' t del ayi ng a deat h i nvest i gat i on.

    9 I t di dn' t del ay t he i nvest i gat i on. I nvest i gat i ons

    10 t ake a ver y l ong t i me. Thi s happens al l of t he

    11 t i me. Thi ngs don' t happen day af t er day af t er day.

    12 Somet i mes t her e i s a del ay. I t ' s a deat h

    13 i nvest i gat i on.

    14 Q. On a homi ci de i nvest i gat i on f or a per son

    15 who l i ves her e i n Mi ami , i s not out of t own, who i s

    16 avai l abl e 24/ 7, i t ' s t ypi cal t o wai t si x mont hs t o

    17 go and t r y t o i nt er vi ew t he al l eged shoot er ?

    18 A. I t ' s t ypi cal t hat somet i mes t hat happens

    19 t hat we don' t i nt er vi ew t hem r i ght away, yes.

    20 Q. What was t he compel l i ng necessi t y other

    21 t han school t est s t o wai t si x mont hs bef or e you

    22 t r i ed t o t ake hi s st at ement ?

    23 A. That ' s when i t wor ked out , Mr . Dur kee. We

    24 spoke. Ther e wer e ot her dat es. The f i r st dat e was

    25 cancel ed. I ' m not sur e i f we t r i ed t o r eschedul e.

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    24/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    193

    1 I was speaki ng wi t h the at t or neys and t hose wer e t he

    2 dat es we ended up wi t h. I had sever al ot her cases.

    3 Ot her t hi ngs were happeni ng.

    4 Q. Now, anot her t hi ng you coul d have done at

    5 t he t i me of t he - - t he day of t he i nvest i gat i on, t he

    6 day of t he shoot i ng, was t o t ake possessi on of t he

    7 wave r unner whi ch was r eal l y par t of t hi s whol e

    8 scenar i o, cor r ect ?

    9 A. We coul d have done t hat , yes.

    10 Q. You coul d have i mpounded i t , r i ght ?

    11 A. We coul d have, yes.

    12 Q. And you di dn' t do t hat ?

    13 A. No, we deci ded not t o.

    14 Q. And t hat ' s because you di dn' t f eel l i ke i t

    15 had any evi dent i ar y val ue at t hat poi nt , cor r ect ? I

    16 mean, evi dence i s kept i n a ver y st r i ct chai n of

    17 cust ody, et cet er a, et cet er a. At t hat poi nt you

    18 must have di scount ed t he wave r unner as havi ng any

    19 evi dent i ar y val ue, cor r ect ?

    20 A. No, we phot ogr aphed i t and pr ocessed i t t o

    21 t he best of our abi l i t y and al l of t he per t i nent

    22 t hi ngs t hat we t hought we needed f r om i t and we

    23 deci ded not t o i mpound i t .

    24 Q. Now, event ual l y sever al weeks l at er , t hey

    25 f ound t hi s bl ack devi ce i nsi de t he gut s of t he wave

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    25/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    194

    1 r unner , r i ght ?

    2 A. That ' s cor r ect .

    3 Q. And t hey f ound t hat t he f r ont compar t ment

    4 door had been br oken down or r i pped of f . I t hi nk

    5 t hat was t he phr ase t hey used, r i pped of f .

    6 A. I ' m not sur e about t he phr ase. I t had

    7 been t amper ed wi t h.

    8 Q. And once t hat was brought t o your

    9 at t ent i on by Mr . Davi s, you went t o hi s of f i ce and

    10 secur ed t he bl ack devi ce f i r st , r i ght ?

    11 A. I woul d have t o l ook at my chai n of

    12 event s, but i f t hat ' s what you say, I went t her e

    13 f i r st , okay. I know I r et r i eved t he box f r om hi m

    14 and t hen subsequent l y I i nt er vi ewed t he gent l eman

    15 who f ound i t at t he J et Ski shop.

    16 Q. And t hen you went t o t he J et Ski shop and

    17 you t ook a ser i es of phot ogr aphs wi t h t he f r ont

    18 compar t ment open and you document ed t he f act t hat

    19 t he back panel had been r i pped of f and you

    20 document ed t hese devi ces wi t h t hei r f emal e and mal e

    21 r ecept acl es of how i t wor ked. I s t hat r i ght ?

    22 A. The cr i me scene det ect i ve i s t he one who

    23 t akes pi ct ur es and wr i t es t he r epor t s on t hat , but I

    24 was t her e and I observed i t .

    25 Q. Ri ght , t hat was somet hi ng t hat was par t of

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    26/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    195

    1 your i nvest i gat i on as t he l ead det ect i ve?

    2 A. Ri ght , I obser ved t hat .

    3 Q. And t hat was t he f i r st t i me any of t hat

    4 had been document ed as f ar as bl ack boxes, t he

    5 r ecept or s i nsi de t he wave r unner , t he panel bei ng

    6 br oken of f , and ever yt hi ng el se, cor r ect ?

    7 A. I don' t t hi nk i t was obvi ous t hat t he

    8 panel had been br oken when we f i r st t ook

    9 phot ogr aphs, but at t hat poi nt , yes, i t was obvi ous,

    10 you know, we saw t he bl ack box and t hat t he panel

    11 had been t ampered wi t h.

    12 Q. You t hought t hat was i mpor t ant t o document

    13 t hat , r i ght , because t hat ' s why you went out t o t he

    14 wave runner shop and phot ogr aphed i t wi t h cr i me

    15 scene i nvest i gat or s, r i ght ?

    16 A. Yes.

    17 Q. Now, pr i or t o t he bl ack box bei ng f ound

    18 and, you know, i t ' s chr onol ogi cal i n your r epor t ,

    19 you conduct ed a canvas of t he ar ea, i s t hat r i ght ,

    20 of t he home wher e t he shoot i ng occur r ed, r i ght ?

    21 A. Can you t el l me whi ch page we ar e on?

    22 Q. I t i s on Page 18.

    23 A. So you' r e r ef er r i ng t o May 24t h?

    24 Q. That i s cor r ect .

    25 A. The area canvas, yes.

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    27/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    196

    1 Q. And t hen i f you l ook at t he second page on

    2 t hat same day, at appr oxi mat el y 11: 00 a. m. , you made

    3 cont act wi t h Mr . Davi s i n f r ont of hi s r esi dence,

    4 correct?

    5 A. That ' s cor r ect .

    6 Q. And he br ought you i nt o hi s backyard and

    7 showed you t hat t here was a l anyar d at t ached t o hi s

    8 wave r unner t hat was not hi s, r i ght ?

    9 A. That ' s cor r ect .

    10 Q. That l anyar d had not been r et r i eved by you

    11 or your i nvest i gat i ve t eam on t he day of t he

    12 shoot i ng, cor r ect ?

    13 A. That ' s cor r ect .

    14 Q. And t hat was a f or ei gn l anyar d and

    15 Mr . Davi s act ual l y t ook you ar ound t he back of t he

    16 house and made sure you preser ved i t as evi dence,

    17 r i ght ?

    18 A. Ri ght , but we di dn' t know i t was f or ei gn

    19 unt i l t hen. We di dn' t know i t was f or ei gn at t hat

    20 t i me.

    21 Q. Ri ght , Mr . Davi s was t he one t hat br ought

    22 t hat t o your at t ent i on on t hi s dat e a f ew days l at er

    23 on May 24t h, r i ght ?

    24 A. That i s cor r ect .

    25 Q. Now, at t hat t i me, di d Mr . Davi s ever t el l

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    28/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    197

    1 you t hat t he f r ont compar t ment may l i kel y be a pl ace

    2 wher e t he f i r ear m was or t he gun?

    3 A. I don' t t hi nk he t ol d me t hat at t hat

    4 t i me.

    5 Q. And t hen subsequent t o t hat i s when you

    6 went t o Mr . Davi s' s of f i ce. I bel i eve i t was on

    7 J une 2nd. I f you go t o Page 21, i t st ar t s J une 2nd,

    8 and cont i nues t o t he next page al l t he way down t o

    9 4: 00 p. m. on t hat dat e. That ' s when he pr ovi ded t o

    10 you t hi s bl ack box and t hen event ual l y you f ol l owed

    11 up wi t h Wayne Wi l l i ams, cor r ect ?

    12 A. That ' s cor r ect .

    13 Q. At t hat t i me when he gave you t he bl ack

    14 box, di d he t el l you t hat i t was l i kel y t hat may

    15 have been what was suspect ed t o be t he gun?

    16 A. No.

    17 Q. Now, on J ul y 22, 2011 i s when you were

    18 f i nal l y abl e t o i nt er vi ew J asmi ne Davi s, cor r ect ?

    19 A. J ul y 22nd. I t sounds r i ght . I woul d have

    20 t o l ook t hr ough and ver i f y t he dat e, but - -

    21 THE COURT: What was t he year ?

    22 MR. DURKEE: 2011. J ul y 22, 2011.

    23 A. J ul y 22nd, yes, 2011.

    24 Q. And you woul d agr ee wi t h me t hat

    25 chr onol ogi cal l y t hat was af t er t he bl ack box had

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    29/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    198

    1 been di scover ed i n t he f r ont compar t ment by

    2 Mr . Davi s, cor r ect ?

    3 A. Yes. That occur r ed af t er , yes.

    4 Q. And i t was al so af t er i t was di scover ed

    5 t hat Reynal do was deaf and had a pr of oundl y hard

    6 t i me maki ng noi se, cor r ect ?

    7 A. I ' m sor r y, say t hat agai n.

    8 Q. That was al so af t er i t was common

    9 knowl edge, newspapers, et cet era, t hat Reynal do was

    10 deaf and mut e, cor r ect ?

    11 A. I knew t hat . I don' t know i f i t was i n

    12 t he newspaper s or common knowl edge, but I knew t hat

    13 he was - - he was deaf but he coul d make noi ses and

    14 sounds and wor ds.

    15 Q. Thi s was t he f i r st t i me t hat anybody had

    16 t ol d you t hat t her e was somet hi ng t hat l ooked l i ke a

    17 gun t hat had been pl aced i n t he f r ont compar t ment of

    18 t he wave r unner , cor r ect ?

    19 A. I bel i eve so. Fr om Mr s. Davi s' s

    20 i nt er vi ew, I bel i eve so.

    21 Q. And t hi s i s t he f i r st t i me anyone t ol d you

    22 he was r eachi ng i n t he f r ont compar t ment when he was

    23 shot , cor r ect ?

    24 A. That was her st atement , yes.

    25 Q. Now, she t ol d you i n her st at ement t hat

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    30/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    199

    1 she r ecal l ed t el l i ng t he of f i cer s t hat t he man had a

    2 gun and t o l ook f or a gun, cor r ect ?

    3 A. That i s cor r ect .

    4 Q. Di d you ever ask her , "Ma' am, why di dn' t

    5 you t el l us t hat i t was i n t he f r ont compar t ment "?

    6 A. I don' t know i f I asked her t hat speci f i c

    7 quest i on, but she expl ai ned t hat i n her i nt er vi ew.

    8 Q. How di d she expl ai n t hat ?

    9 A. Wel l , she expl ai ned t hat she saw hi m l ean

    10 f or war d put t i ng somet hi ng i n t he f r ont compar t ment ,

    11 whi ch she bel i eved t o be t he gun t hat he was hol di ng

    12 i n hi s hands, and t hen he agai n l eaned i n t he f r ont

    13 compar t ment , whi ch i s why she t hought he was goi ng

    14 t o shoot her .

    15 Q. Ri ght , whi ch i t woul d seem t hat her , mor e

    16 t han anybody el se i n t he whol e wor l d, woul d want

    17 somebody t o l ook i n t hat f r ont compar t ment and l ook

    18 f or t he gun, r i ght ? I mean, t hat ' s t he t hi ng t hat

    19 was causi ng her t he f ear t o shoot somebody i n t he

    20 head had der i ved f r om, was t hi s f r ont compar t ment

    21 t hat supposedl y i n her mi nd cont ai ned a gun.

    22 Now, she t ol d you i n her st at ement t hat

    23 she r ecal l ed t el l i ng t he of f i cer s t hat he had a gun

    24 and t hat t hey shoul d l ook f or i t . But why di dn' t

    25 you t el l her , "Ma' am, why di dn' t you t el l us t o l ook

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    31/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    200

    1 i n t he f r ont compar t ment ?"

    2 A. Why di dn' t I say t hat t o her ?

    3 Q. Yes, I mean, t hat woul d seem l ogi cal .

    4 "Ma' am, you were at t he scene. We are here wi t h t he

    5 pol i ce of f i cer s. You have a cr i mi nal def ense l awyer

    6 st andi ng r i ght next t o you. You' r e pr of f er i ng

    7 st at ement s. The one pi ece of evi dence t hat i s

    8 excul pat or y, t hat pr oves you j ust i f i ed i n shoot i ng

    9 t hi s f el l ow, i s t he gun. "

    10 Why woul dn' t she, among al l t he peopl e

    11 t hat wer e out t her e, woul d want t o f i nd t hat gun?

    12 You had suba di ver s l ooki ng al l ar ound t he wat er

    13 l ooki ng f or i t . Why di dn' t you ask her , "Ma' am, why

    14 di dn' t you t el l me t he gun was i n t he f r ont

    15 compar t ment ? I was st andi ng r i ght t her e. "

    16 MR. MURPHY: Obj ect i on, J udge,

    17 argument at i ve.

    18 THE COURT: Over r ul ed.

    19 Q. You don' t have an answer t o t hat ?

    20 A. No, no, no. The way you' r e ani mat ed, I

    21 don' t know, I ' m j ust not l i ke t hat . So I don' t know

    22 why I di dn' t t el l her , ma' am, I can' t bel i eve you

    23 di dn' t t el l me. That ' s not how I spoke t o her .

    24 Q. Now, al so at t hat poi nt , because we know

    25 Reynal do was deaf and mut e, t he st or y changed a

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    32/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    201

    1 l i t t l e bi t f r om her f i r st st at ement . Her f i r st

    2 st at ement was, " I sai d I had a gun" and he

    3 r esponded, " I have a gun, t oo. "

    4 Now her st at ement says he' s onl y sayi ng

    5 one wor d, "gun. " I s t hat r i ght ?

    6 A. I don' t know t hat her st at ement ever was

    7 t hat he st at ed, " I have a gun, t oo. " I don' t know

    8 t hat . She t ol d me t hat he sai d, "gun, " and t hat he

    9 had what she bel i eved was a gun i n hi s hands.

    10 Q. Wel l , i n At t or ney Rat zan' s pr of f er t o you

    11 at t he scene, she pr of f er ed t o you on behal f of Ms.

    12 J asmi ne Davi s t he f ol l owi ng quot e, " J asmi ne t ol d t he

    13 man she had a gun and t he man sai d he had a gun,

    14 t oo, " r i ght ?

    15 A. So unl ess you' r e quot i ng f r om my r epor t , I

    16 di dn' t use quot at i ons and t her e i s not quot e t her e.

    17 Q. But you - -

    18 A. I t says, " J asmi ne t ol d t he man she had a

    19 gun and t he man sai d he had a gun, t oo. " I t i s

    20 r easonabl e t o me t hat by sayi ng, "gun, " havi ng

    21 somet hi ng t hat l ooks l i ke gun, coul d be sai d he had

    22 a gun, t oo.

    23 Q. But now she t el l s you i n her st at ement

    24 t hat t he onl y t hi ng she hear d was maybe t he word,

    25 "gun, " r i ght ?

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    33/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    202

    1 A. I don' t know i f she sai d maybe t hat ' s what

    2 she hear d, but she t ol d me t hat she hear d hi m say

    3 "gun. "

    4 Q. And, agai n, i n her st or y t hat she pr ovi ded

    5 t o you i n her st at ement , she i s not sayi ng t hat he

    6 sai d gun i n r esponse t o her command. He j ust

    7 sol i ci t s - - he j ust says t he wor d "gun, " r i ght when

    8 he i s st andi ng next t o t he wave r unner wi t h

    9 somet hi ng bl ack i n hi s hands, r i ght ?

    10 A. I don' t know. I woul d have t o l ook

    11 t hr ough and r ead i t agai n.

    12 Q. Let ' s see i f we can f i nd i t t oget her .

    13 A. I ' m sor r y, what page ar e we on?

    14 Q. I t ' s on Page 35. I t ' s on Page 38.

    15 A. Page 38 at t he t op.

    16 Q. Yes, at t he t op.

    17 So, I mean, she doesn' t say anyt hi ng about

    18 t he f act t hat she sai d she had a gun and t hen he

    19 sai d he had a gun, t oo. She j ust basi cal l y says

    20 t hat she l ost t r ack of hi m f or a second, t hen he

    21 popped out f r om behi nd t he wave runner , whi ch was on

    22 t he el ect r i cal l i f t i n t he backyar d. The man t hen

    23 came ar ound t o t he f r ont of t he wave r unner and she

    24 not i ced t he f r ont of t he hood of t he wave r unner

    25 open. She hear d t he man say, " quot e, unquot e - - and

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    34/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    203

    1 t hi s one i s i n quot es, "gun, " r i ght ?

    2 A. That ' s cor r ect .

    3 Q. So i t ' s no l onger i n r esponse t o her

    4 sayi ng, " I have a gun, " and t hen he says, " I have a

    5 gun, t oo" or "gun" i n r esponse t o her , i t ' s j ust he

    6 goes by t he wave r unner and says, "gun"?

    7 A. Ri ght , I don' t know t hat anywher e i t says

    8 t hat hi s st at ement was i n di r ect r esponse t o her s.

    9 She sai d she had a gun and he sai d he had a gun,

    10 t oo. So sayi ng "gun, " t hat f i t s.

    11 Q. Ri ght , but i f i t had been t he ot her way,

    12 i f i t had been t he way she or i gi nal l y wr i t t en down,

    13 her sayi ng, " I have a gun, " and he sai d, " I have a

    14 gun, t oo, " i f i t was t hat way, i t r eal l y coul dn' t

    15 have happened t hat way because he was deaf . So he

    16 coul dn' t have r esponded t o her when she was t al ki ng

    17 t o hi m, r i ght ?

    18 A. Wel l , he pr obabl y di dn' t f or m t he sent ence

    19 because he coul dn' t do t hat . I have a gun, t oo, I

    20 don' t bel i eve t hat he ever sai d t hat .

    21 Q. And he coul dn' t have r esponded t o her

    22 ver bal commands because he coul dn' t hear , r i ght ?

    23 A. Of cour se he coul d r espond t o her

    24 commands. He coul d r ead l i ps.

    25 Q. Okay.

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    35/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    204

    1 A. So I don' t know why - - he coul d def i ni t el y

    2 r espond t o her .

    3 Q. So i t ' s your i nt er pr et at i on t hat i n t hi s

    4 moment of anar chy and ever yt hi ng el se, he' s l ooki ng

    5 at her and r eadi ng her l i ps of " I have a gun, " and

    6 t hat ' s how you sor t of r ect i f y t hi s?

    7 A. I have no i ssue wi t h t hat . He coul d ver y

    8 wel l be r eadi ng her l i ps and hear her say t hat she

    9 has a gun. That di dn' t seem unr easonabl e t o me.

    10 Q. Now, dur i ng t he st at ement she al so t ol d

    11 you t hat when she wal ked out t he backdoor , she

    12 not i ced t here was a st r anger i n her yar d, number

    13 one. She not i ced t hat t he wave r unner was uncover ed

    14 and t he f ami l y' s boat was not i n t he backyar d and

    15 t he east st orage cl oset was open and t hat ' s when she

    16 became scar ed, cor r ect ?

    17 A. I don' t know i f t hose t hi ngs happened i n

    18 t he or der t hat you j ust sai d, but al l of t hose

    19 t hi ngs di d occur .

    20 Q. But t hat ' s when she got scar ed i s when she

    21 came out t he backdoor and not i ced t hose t hi ngs,

    22 r i ght ?

    23 A. Wel l , she wasn' t scared when she went out

    24 t he backdoor . She became scared as a r esul t of al l

    25 of t hose t hi ngs t hat wer e happeni ng.

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    36/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    205

    1 Q. Now, l et me ask you i f you r emember t hi s

    2 quest i on and t hi s answer on Page 57 of your

    3 deposi t i on.

    4 "Q. So at t he t i me she began t o get

    5 scar ed, she was wal ki ng down t o t he st orage ar ea

    6 t owar ds t he seawal l . I s t hat r i ght ?

    7 "A. I t appear s as t hough she wal ked out

    8 t he backyard. She hadn' t wal ked al l t he way down or

    9 t owar ds t he seawal l . She j ust wal ked out of her

    10 backdoor .

    11 "Q. She j ust wal ked out of her backdoor ,

    12 not i ced t hese t hi ngs and began t o get scar ed. I s

    13 t hat what she t ol d you?

    14 "A. Yes. "

    15 Do you r emember gi vi ng t hat t est i mony?

    16 A. Yes.

    17 Q. So J asmi ne t ol d you t hat as soon as she

    18 got out t he backdoor , t hat ' s when she st ar t ed t o get

    19 scar ed, r i ght ?

    20 A. No. What I sai d t hen and what I am sayi ng

    21 now i s t hat when she came out si de of her backdoor ,

    22 af t er al l of t he t hi ngs t hat she obser ved and t he

    23 t hi ngs t hat wer e happeni ng, she got scared.

    24 Q. That ' s what you t ol d me i n your

    25 deposi t i on, r i ght , what I j ust r ead, r i ght ?

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    37/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    206

    1 A. Whi ch i s t he same t hi ng I ' m sayi ng r i ght

    2 now.

    3 Q. Okay.

    4 Now, you f i nal l y i nt er vi ewed J ack Davi s on

    5 November 29, 2011, si x mont hs af t er t he shoot i ng.

    6 We t al ked about t hat , r i ght ?

    7 A. That i s cor r ect .

    8 Q. And one of t he mai n t hi ngs he sai d was he

    9 shot because hi s mot her t ol d hi m t hat t he f el l ow i n

    10 t he wat er had a gun, r i ght ?

    11 A. Ri ght .

    12 Q. Now, you al r eady t ol d t he Cour t you

    13 l i st ened t o t he 911 t ape. Fi r st of al l , t hr oughout

    14 t he 911 t ape, Ms. J asmi ne Davi s i s t al ki ng i n a ver y

    15 exci t ed and i n a hi gh, al most scr eami ng on t he 911

    16 t ape, cor r ect ?

    17 A. I r ecal l her bei ng ver y exci t ed, yes.

    18 Q. And you never heard on t hat 911 t ape her

    19 say t o her son, "He' s got a gun"?

    20 A. I don' t r ecal l hear i ng t hat . I haven' t

    21 l i st ened t o t he 911 t ape f or qui t e some t i me.

    22 Q. Wel l , i sn' t t hat what a l ead i nvest i gat or

    23 i s supposed t o do? You got t wo f ol ks t hat have

    24 al r eady l i ed t o you. You know t hei r cr edi bi l i t y

    25 f r om t he day t hi s i nvest i gat i on st ar t ed shoul d be

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    38/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    207

    1 di mi ni shed because t hey have al r eady l i ed t o t he

    2 pol i ce of f i cer s and now you got hi m sayi ng t he sol e

    3 r eason I shot was because my mom t ol d me he had a

    4 gun. Woul dn' t you go back t o t he 911 t ape and see

    5 whet her you ever hear d her t el l her son i n t hi s

    6 exci t ed voi ce, "He' s got a gun. Be car ef ul , he' s

    7 got a gun?"

    8 Woul dn' t you at l east do t hat t o

    9 i nvest i gat e whet her hi s st or y t hat he' s t el l i ng i s

    10 t r ue or not ?

    11 A. As I sai d, I ' m sur e I l i s tened t o t he

    12 t ape. I di dn' t make a not at i on. I don' t r ecal l

    13 hear i ng her say t hat .

    14 Q. I mean, whet her she sai d t hat t o hi m or

    15 not i s cr uci al t o your i nvest i gat i on, i sn' t i t ?

    16 A. That she t ol d hi m he had a gun? He i s - -

    17 i s i t i mpor t ant ? I t ' s al l i mpor t ant .

    18 Q. Wel l , I mean, wi t hout her t el l i ng hi m he' s

    19 got a gun, he' s got no r easonabl e f ear f or hi s l i f e

    20 because t here i s no gun. He di dn' t know t here was a

    21 gun out t her e. He never saw a gun.

    22 A. Hi s f ear was f r om hi s mot her , hi s mot her ' s

    23 r eact i on t o what was goi ng on. He was r eact i ng of f

    24 of hi s mot her , cl ear l y.

    25 Q. Cl ear l y, but t hat doesn' t gi ve you a r i ght

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    39/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    208

    1 t o shoot somebody i n t he head. What he sai d i s I

    2 shot because I was i n f ear f or my l i f e because my

    3 mom t ol d me he had a gun.

    4 So t hat ' s r eal l y t he key par t of usi ng

    5 deadl y f or ce i s t hat he i s i n f ear f or hi s l i f e,

    6 r i ght ?

    7 A. Ri ght . I bel i eve he was i n f ear f or hi s

    8 l i f e.

    9 Q. And t he r eason he' s i n f ear f or hi s l i f e

    10 i s because he f eel s l i ke t he f el l ow i n t he wat er has

    11 a gun and t he way he der i ves t hat i nf ormat i on,

    12 accor di ng t o hi s st at ement , i s hi s mot her t el l s hi m

    13 he' s got a gun. That ' s what he t ol d you, r i ght ?

    14 A. Yes, t hat ' s what he sai d.

    15 Q. So t hen my quest i on t o you i s, do you

    16 speci f i cal l y r ecal l af t er he gave t hi s st at ement

    17 goi ng back t o t he 911 t ape t o see whet her t here was

    18 any r ecor di ng of t he mot her t el l i ng t he son he' s got

    19 a gun?

    20 A. I j ust t ol d you t hat I l i st ened t o t he 911

    21 t ape and I di d not hear her say t hat . I t doesn' t

    22 mean she di dn' t say i t . I di d not hear her say t hat

    23 on t he 911 t ape.

    24 Q. Now, somet hi ng el se t hat he t ol d you i n

    25 hi s st at ement was t hat when he t ook t he wave r unner

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    40/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    209

    1 and st ar t ed t o go out t o t he bay and l eave t he

    2 pr emi ses, t hat hi s mot her sai d i n an exci t ed way and

    3 you put quot es on t hi s - -

    4 A. What page?

    5 Q. I t ' s wher e he gi ves hi s st at ement , but I

    6 wi l l f i nd i t f or you.

    7 A. On Page 47?

    8 Q. I t hi nk t hat ' s i t .

    9 A. Okay.

    10 Q. Ri ght . I wi l l quot e i t f or you. He t ol d

    11 you, " J ack' s mot her sai d t o hi m t o wai t . She was

    12 exci t ed and sai d, " and you wr ot e t hi s one i n quot es,

    13 "Wai t ! Wai t ! Wai t ! Ver y qui ckl y. They st ar t ed t o

    14 f eel r el i ef t he man was goi ng t o l eave. "

    15 I asked you agai n, "She sai d t hi s i n an

    16 exci t ed and l oud manner , wai t , wai t , he' s l eavi ng. "

    17 Di d you ever go back t o t he 911 t ape t o see whet her

    18 you coul d ver i f y whet her she i n f act r eal l y di d say

    19 that?

    20 A. I t ol d you t hat I l i st ened t o t he 911

    21 t ape.

    22 Q. Di d you hear J asmi ne Davi s scr eami ng,

    23 "Wai t , wai t , wai t "?

    24 A. I don' t r ecal l her screami ng, "Wai t , wai t ,

    25 wai t . "

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    41/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    210

    1 Q. I mean, don' t you agr ee i f t he 911 t ape,

    2 whi ch was r ecor di ng cont emporaneousl y wi t h t hi s

    3 event happeni ng, doesn' t suppor t t hese st at ement s

    4 t hat ar e gi ven si x mont hs l at er , t her e i s some

    5 cont r adi ct i on her e?

    6 A. I have no i ssue wi t h i t . The phone coul d

    7 have been away f r om her mout h. Maybe i t wasn' t next

    8 t o her mout h when she was t al ki ng.

    9 Q. But t hese ar e f ol ks - -

    10 A. I have no i ssue wi t h t hat what soever .

    11 Q. These f ol ks al r eady have di mi ni shed

    12 credi bi l i t y wi t h you. You t ol d us t hat , because

    13 t hey l i ed, bot h of t hem di d, r i ght of f t he bat ,

    14 r i ght ?

    15 A. They di dn' t l i e t o me. What I was t ol d by

    16 t he ot her of f i cer s was not t he same t hi ng I was t ol d

    17 by J ack and J asmi ne. So t hey never l i ed t o me.

    18 Q. You knew t hat t hese f ol ks, t he ver y f i r st

    19 t hi ng t hey di d when t al ki ng t o pol i ce of f i cer s af t er

    20 t hi s shoot i ng, was t o l i e. You knew t hat , di dn' t

    21 you?

    22 A. That was t he st at ement t hat t hey made,

    23 yes.

    24 Q. And we al r eady t al ked about t hat . At t he

    25 ver y begi nni ng of my cr oss exami nat i on I sai d t o you

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    42/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    211

    1 when peopl e l i e t o t he pol i ce, you have t o put a

    2 l i t t l e mar k, cr edi bi l i t y i s a f act or and you agr eed

    3 wi t h t hat . Cr edi bi l i t y has t o be l ooked at ,

    4 correct?

    5 A. I woul d agr ee wi t h t hat , but I t hi nk you

    6 al so t ake t he t ot al i t y of t he ci r cumst ances and you

    7 t r y t o under st and - - as pol i ce of f i cer s, we t r y t o

    8 under st and why do peopl e l i e? What i s t hei r

    9 mot i vat i on? What ' s goi ng on? Peopl e l i e t o t he

    10 pol i ce al l t he t i me.

    11 Q. Absol ut el y. And t hen you go back and t r y

    12 and pul l out obj ect i ve evi dence and compar e i t t o

    13 t hei r s tat ement s t o see i f i t al l j i ves , r i ght ?

    14 A. That ' s r i ght .

    15 Q. Because t hat way, you got t hese peopl e

    16 t hat have some di mi ni shed credi bi l i t y, t hey l i ed, we

    17 know t hat , so now we' ve got t o real l y hol d t hem up

    18 t o t he br i ght l i ght of obj ect i ve f act s and see

    19 whet her we can support what ' s comi ng out of t hei r

    20 mout h.

    21 So i t seems l i ke you woul d go back t o t he

    22 911 t ape and see whether you coul d ver i f y t hese

    23 st at ement s t hat J ack was maki ng on t he 911 t ape.

    24 Di d you do t hat ?

    25 A. I j ust t ol d you t hat I l i st ened t o i t and

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    43/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    212

    1 I di dn' t hear , "Wai t , wai t , wai t , " nor di d I hear

    2 t hat he had a gun. I ' m not sur e what el se you' r e

    3 aski ng.

    4 Q. Wel l , t hat ' s what I was aski ng.

    5 A. Wel l , I answer ed t hat t wi ce al r eady.

    6 Q. Now, t he obj ect i ve evi dence ot her t han t he

    7 st at ement s t hat were gi ven by J asmi ne and J ack was,

    8 number one, you gat her ed up f i nger pr i nt s t hat we

    9 know you wer en' t abl e t o gat her any - - I f or get what

    10 t he cr i mi nal cour t uses, but i t ' s any evi dence t hat

    11 was of val ue f or t he f i nger pr i nt s t hat you guys

    12 t ook. I s t hat cor r ect ?

    13 A. That i s cor r ect .

    14 Q. Then you t ook DNA al l over t he scene, not

    15 al l over t he scene, but i n cer t ai n l ocat i ons and you

    16 wer e abl e t o gat her no evi dence t hat was of val ue

    17 wi t h t he DNA t est i ng. I s t hat r i ght ?

    18 A. That ' s cor r ect .

    19 Q. And you were hopi ng t o suppor t Ms. Davi s' s

    20 and J ack' s st at ement t hat he was al l t he way up by

    21 t he f r ont of t he st or age f aci l i t y because maybe hi s

    22 DNA had t r ansf er r ed ont o t he door or maybe hi s

    23 f i nger pr i nt s had t r ansf er r ed i n t he ar ea t hat was up

    24 by t he house, cor r ect ?

    25 A. Wel l , t hat ' s t he r eason we swabbed t he

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    44/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    213

    1 door and dust ed t he door s t o see i f we can f i nd hi s

    2 f i nger pr i nt s.

    3 Q. And you never f ound any obj ect i ve evi dence

    4 t hat suppor t ed t hat he was up by t he house?

    5 A. We had a negat i ve r esul t wi t h t he

    6 f i nger pr i nt s and t he DNA.

    7 Q. So t her e was no obj ect i ve evi dence t o

    8 suppor t t he st at ement of J asmi ne t hat he was up by

    9 t he st or age f aci l i t i es, cor r ect ?

    10 A. Yeah, t hat ' s r i ght .

    11 Q. You al so had obj ect i ve evi dence t hat

    12 Reynal do had been shot f r om behi nd and t he bul l et s

    13 wer e comi ng f r om t he back r i ght t o t he back par t of

    14 hi s head. I s t hat r i ght ?

    15 A. I ' m showi ng on t he r i ght si de. Back t o

    16 f r ont , r i ght si de.

    17 Q. But back t o f r ont , cor r ect ?

    18 A. I bel i eve t hat ' s what t he aut opsy says.

    19 Q. You obvi ousl y went down and t al ked t o t he

    20 medi cal exami ner t o make sur e you knew exact l y what

    21 hi s f i ndi ng wer e and hi s opi ni ons wer e as a r esul t

    22 of where t he shoot er was when he got hi t wi t h t he

    23 bul l et s, r i ght ?

    24 A. That was di scussed, yes.

    25 Q. And he t ol d you t hat t he shooter was

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    45/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    214

    1 behi nd hi m r i ght t o l ef t , back t o f r ont ?

    2 A. I t was on t he r i ght si de. So back t o

    3 f r ont .

    4 Q. The bul l et s wer e comi ng f r om behi nd?

    5 A. Fr om t he r i ght si de. Not f r om behi nd.

    6 Fr om t he r i ght si de and back t o f r ont and sl i ght l y

    7 downward, I bel i eve. You have a copy of t he aut opsy

    8 r epor t , r i ght ?

    9 Q. I do, and we have t aken hi s deposi t i on so

    10 t he Cour t wi l l be abl e t o r ead t hat , but you

    11 r emember me aski ng t hi s quest i on and you gi vi ng t hi s

    12 answer on Page 58:

    13 "Q. So he had t o have been f aci ng away

    14 f r om t he gun when he was shot . I s t hat r i ght ?

    15 "A. The back of hi s head was t owards t he

    16 gun, yes.

    17 "Q. Okay, and you t hi nk t hat he was

    18 f aci ng when he was shot t owar ds t he bay or do you

    19 t hi nk he was f aci ng t owar ds t he pr oper t y?

    20 "A. Wel l , i f t hey wer e st andi ng on t he

    21 seawal l and he was shot i n t he back t owar d t he

    22 f r ont , t hen he woul d have had t o have been f aci ng

    23 t owar ds t he bay. "

    24 Do you r emember gi vi ng t hose answer s?

    25 A. Yes.

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    46/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    215

    1 Q. And you agr ee wi t h t hat as you si t her e

    2 t oday?

    3 A. Yes, f r om r i ght si de, back t o f r ont , yes,

    4 he woul d have t o be f aci ng t he bay.

    5 MR. DURKEE: Thank you. I have no f ur t her

    6 quest i ons.

    7 THE COURT: Redi r ect .

    8 MR. MURPHY: Yes.

    9 MR. DURKEE: Oh, I have one f ur t her one,

    10 Your Honor . I ' m sor r y.

    11 THE COURT: That ' s okay.

    12 Q. ( By Mr . Dur kee) I ' m goi ng t o show you now

    13 what has been mar ked as Pl ai nt i f f ' s 1- L f or I D and

    14 what was pr evi ousl y marked as 1- K f or I D.

    15 You i nst r uct ed or somebody i nst r uct ed t he

    16 cr i me scene i nvest i gat or s t o t ake a pi ct ur e of J ack

    17 and t o t ake a pi ct ur e of t he shi r t he had on when he

    18 di d t he shoot i ng. I s t hat r i ght ?

    19 A. Yes.

    20 Q. By t he t i me t he pol i ce had got t en t her e,

    21 J ack had al r eady changed hi s shi r t , number one,

    22 true?

    23 A. He was wear i ng a di f f er ent shi r t .

    24 Q. And t he shi r t t hat he had on dur i ng t he

    25 shoot i ng had al r eady been pl aced i n a bucket wi t h

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    47/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    216

    1 soapy wat er and had t o be ret r i eved by t he pol i ce,

    2 correct?

    3 A. Yes. The Davi s housekeeper was ver y

    4 ef f i ci ent .

    5 Q. To say t he l east .

    6 Now, you have i nvest i gat ed l ot s of

    7 homi ci des and ever yt hi ng el se. I mean, you

    8 underst and t hat peopl e may t r y and cover up

    9 evi dence, cor r ect ?

    10 A. Peopl e do t hat , yes.

    11 Q. Di d t hi s r ai se any suspi ci on t o you t hat

    12 wi t hi n t he f i r s t hal f hour , wi t hi n t he f i r s t f ew

    13 mi nut es af t er t he shoot i ng, t hat t he shoot er had

    14 al r eady changed shi r t s and t he bl oody shi r t had been

    15 put i n somet hi ng t o cl ean i t ? Di d t hat r ai se any

    16 suspi ci on t o you at al l ?

    17 A. No.

    18 MR. DURKEE: Okay. Thank you. I have no

    19 f ur t her quest i ons.

    20 THE COURT: Redi r ect .

    21 MR. MURPHY: Yes.

    22 REDI RECT EXAMI NATI ON

    23 BY MR. MURPHY:

    24 Q. Det ect i ve Nye, j ust a f ew f ol l ow- up

    25 quest i ons. You wer e posed quest i ons f r om t he

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    48/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    217

    1 l awyer , whi ch I t hi nk you pr obabl y f i gur ed out wer e

    2 goi ng t owar d t he gi st of an ar gument t hat t he cr i me

    3 scene was somehow cont ami nat ed and wi t nesses wer e

    4 not bei ng sequest er ed. Di d you get t hat i mpr essi on

    5 f r om t he quest i ons?

    6 A. Yes.

    7 Q. Now, consi der i ng what was br ought up, di d

    8 any of t hat i n t hi s i nvest i gat i on ever cause you or

    9 l ead you t o bel i eve t hat because of any al l eged

    10 sequest r at i on pr obl ems or cr i me scene cont ami nat i on,

    11 t hat t he Davi ses wer e not i n l egi t i mat e f ear of t he

    12 t hr eat t hat t hey wer e r epor t i ng based upon t hat

    13 al l eged cont ami nat i on and sequest r at i on of wi t ness

    14 probl ems?

    15 MR. DURKEE: Obj ect i on, Your Honor .

    16 THE COURT: I ' m goi ng t o over r ul e t hat

    17 obj ect i on t he way i t was phr ased. You may

    18 answer .

    19 A. I t has no af f ect on t hei r absol ut e f ear

    20 and t er r or , none what soever .

    21 Q. Counsel asked you a l ot of quest i ons about

    22 t he f i r st l i e t hat t hey t ol d you and t hat t he l i e,

    23 and we tal ked about i t and i t has been acknowl edged

    24 i n t hi s case, t hat i s, t he f act t hat J asmi ne Davi s

    25 at t he out set sai d t hat she was t he one t hat shot

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    49/153

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    50/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    219

    1 i nt egr i t y or cr edi t abi l i t y of t hei r ver si on of what

    2 happened and t he f ear and t hr eat t hat t hey

    3 exper i enced?

    4 MR. DURKEE: Obj ect i on.

    5 THE COURT: Over r ul ed.

    6 A. No, not at al l .

    7 Q. You were asked some quest i ons about i f you

    8 coul d have - - r emember t he quest i ons about , wai t ,

    9 wai t , wai t ? Remember t hose quest i ons scr eami ng,

    10 wai t , wai t , wai t ?

    11 A. Yes.

    12 Q. And you were di r ect ed t o Page 47 of your

    13 r epor t , r emember?

    14 A. Yes.

    15 Q. And r emember t he at t orney I t hi nk was

    16 sayi ng somet hi ng about - - he sai d i n an exci t ed

    17 t one, wai t , wai t , wai t , and he was act ual l y shout i ng

    18 i t more t han exci t ed. Do you r emember t hat quest i on

    19 a f ew mi nut es ago?

    20 A. Yes.

    21 Q. I woul d l i ke t o di r ect you t o Page 47 and

    22 I t hi nk t he passage t hat we wer e deal i ng wi t h t hat

    23 he was r ef er enci ng appear s t o be t he l ast sent ence

    24 i n t hat mi ddl e par agr aph. Do you see t hat ?

    25 A. Yes, I do.

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    51/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    220

    1 Q. Coul d you r ead t hat ? And t hi s i s a

    2 par aphr asi ng of t he st at ement t hat J ack gave t o you,

    3 correct?

    4 A. Yes.

    5 Q. Wi t h r egar d t o t hat , wai t , wai t , wai t

    6 i ssue, coul d you pl ease r ead what you r epor t ed t hat

    7 J ack sai d i n t hat st at ement ver bat i m, wor d f or wor d?

    8 A. " J ack' s mot her sai d f or hi m t o wai t . She

    9 was ver y exci t ed and sai d, wai t , wai t , wai t ver y

    10 qui ckl y. "

    11 Q. Hol d on. Let ' s t ake i t sl owl y. That l ast

    12 sent ence, do you see t hat l ast sent ence t hat says,

    13 "She was exci t ed"?

    14 A. Uh- huh.

    15 Q. Do you see t hat ?

    16 A. Yes.

    17 Q. Read t hat sent ence, i f you coul d, i n i t s

    18 ent i r et y and ver y sl owl y, pl ease.

    19 A. "She was exci t ed and sai d" - -

    20 Q. Fi r st par t of i t i s, "She was exci t ed. "

    21 We al l agr ee t hat she was exci t ed, r i ght ?

    22 A. Yes.

    23 Q. Next par t of i t .

    24 A. "She was exci t ed and sai d, wai t , wai t ,

    25 wai t ver y qui ckl y. " That ' s i t .

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    52/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    221

    1 Q. I t says, "She was exci t ed and t hen sai d,

    2 wai t , wai t , wai t . " I t doesn' t char act er i ze how she

    3 sai d i t . I t doesn' t say t hat she was screami ng i t .

    4 I t j ust st at es t hat she was exci t ed and t hen sai d

    5 wai t , wai t , wai t , ver y qui ckl y, " r i ght ?

    6 A. Yes.

    7 Q. So t hat ' s t he descr i pt i on of t he wai t ,

    8 wai t , wai t , r i ght ? Not t hat i t was shout ed, not

    9 t hat i t was scr eamed, but t hat i t was sai d ver y

    10 qui ckl y, cor r ect ?

    11 A. That ' s cor r ect .

    12 Q. And t hat ' s exact l y what t hat sent ence

    13 sai d?

    14 A. That ' s cor r ect .

    15 MR. MURPHY: That ' s al l I have.

    16 MR. DURKEE: May I have a br i ef r ecr oss?

    17 THE COURT: I f i t ' s on somet hi ng new.

    18 MR. DURKEE: One quest i on.

    19 THE COURT: Go ahead.

    20 RECROSS EXAMI NATI ON

    21 BY MR. DURKEE:

    22 Q. You know what an excl amat i on poi nt i s,

    23 r i ght ?

    24 A. I do.

    25 Q. I mean, you' r e wr i t i ng a pol i ce r epor t on

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    53/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    222

    1 a homi ci de, you want t o be as absol ut el y accur at e as

    2 you possi bl y can be, r i ght ?

    3 A. That ' s cor r ect .

    4 Q. What does an excl amat i on poi nt mean?

    5 A. An excl amat i on poi nt i s somet hi ng t hat

    6 says wi t h emphasi s.

    7 Q. And t hi s i s one of t he ar eas i n your

    8 r epor t t hat you act ual l y used quot at i on mar ks

    9 because you want ed t o capt ur e ver bat i m what J ack

    10 t ol d you, cor r ect ?

    11 A. That ' s cor r ect .

    12 Q. And you wr ot e i n quot at i on marks, "Wai t !

    13 Wai t ! Wai t , " so t hat you accur at el y and compl et el y

    14 capt ur e what J ack t ol d you, cor r ect ?

    15 A. That i s r i ght , because he sai d, "wai t ,

    16 wai t , wai t . "

    17 MR. DURKEE: No f ur t her quest i ons.

    18 THE COURT: Let me ask a quest i on. When

    19 you t ook f i nger pr i nt s t o t r y t o l i f t pr i nt s f r om

    20 t he door s or any of t he DNA, were t here any

    21 el i mi nat i on pr i nt s or DNA t aken f r om t he peopl e

    22 who r esi ded i n t he house?

    23 THE WI TNESS: I woul d have t o l ook and

    24 see. I don' t r ecal l , but t her e was not hi ng of

    25 val ue. I t was such a mi x of DNA, t here was

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    54/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    223

    1 not hi ng t hat coul d be ext r act ed of any val ue.

    2 THE COURT: Were t he f i ngerpr i nt s or were

    3 any suf f i ci ent poi nt of i dent i f i cat i on, wer e

    4 t hey of any val ue, do you now?

    5 THE WI TNESS: No, t her e was no val ue

    6 what soever .

    7 THE COURT: Al l r i ght . Thank you.

    8 Anythi ng el se?

    9 MR. DURKEE: No, Your Honor .

    10 THE COURT: Thank you, Det ect i ve

    11 Nye- Gonzal ez. You may st ep down.

    12 ( Wi t ness excused. )

    13 THE COURT: We have been goi ng f or an

    14 hour , what do we have l ef t ?

    15 MR. MURPHY: J udge, f r om our poi nt of

    16 vi ew, we j ust woul d admi t recor ds i nt o evi dence

    17 and ot her t han t hat we woul d r est .

    18 MR. DURKEE: That ' s goi ng t o t ake some

    19 t i me because he j ust want s t he whol e t hi ng

    20 submi t t ed and I don' t thi nk al l of i t shoul d be

    21 submi t t ed.

    22 MR. MURPHY: Al l of what ?

    23 THE COURT: That ' s why we ar e goi ng t o

    24 t ake a break now f or 15 mi nut es and you guys can

    25 t al k on t he br eak and t hen I wi l l come out and

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    55/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    224

    1 l i st en t o t he r est . So I wi l l be back i n about

    2 15 mi nut es.

    3 ( Recess t aken. )

    4 THE COURT: So Mr . Mur phy?

    5 MR. MURPHY: We' r e j ust goi ng t o move our

    6 exhi bi t s f or I D i nt o evi dence and t hen some

    7 ot her evi dence, but I t hi nk Mr . Dur kee sai d he

    8 want ed t o go t hr ough i t f i r st . I don' t know

    9 t hat we have a di sagr eement .

    10 THE COURT: That ' s f i ne.

    11 MR. DURKEE: J ust admi ni st r at i ve at t he

    12 end, Your Honor . We al so agr eed t o f our

    13 deposi t i ons bei ng submi t t ed t o t he Cour t i n

    14 t hei r ent i r et y.

    15 And we have bot h gi ven t he Cour t

    16 desi gnat i ons as t o what t he def endant , or t he

    17 par t y wi t h t he bur den of pr oof i n t hi s hear i ng,

    18 has desi gnat ed and al so what we have desi gnat ed

    19 as t o what we f eel you shoul d concent r at e on.

    20 THE COURT: What are t he f our deposi t i ons?

    21 MR. MURPHY: We sent i n a bi nder wi t h

    22 t hem, pl us desi gnat i ons.

    23 THE COURT: Di d you?

    24 MR. MURPHY: Yes.

    25 THE COURT: When?

  • 8/9/2019 Evidentiary Hearing Day 2, 2011 Killing of Reynaldo Muoz

    56/153

    Munoz vs. Davis December 29, 2014

    Florida Realtime Reporting Fax 305.371.3460

    www.taylorjonovic.com Taylor, Jonovic, White, Gendron & Kircher-Echarte 305.358.9047

    225

    1 MR. MURPHY: Two weeks ago.

    2 THE COURT: We have t o f i nd i t , t hen. I

    3 want t