Evidence in Arbitration Does it Pay Off to Play...

23
1 Evidence in Arbitration Does it Pay Off to Play Dirty? Victoria Pernt

Transcript of Evidence in Arbitration Does it Pay Off to Play...

  • 1

    Evidence in Arbitration

    Does it Pay Off to Play Dirty?

    Victoria Pernt

  • 2

    Does It Pay Off to Intimidate Witnesses?

  • 3

    Does It Pay Off to Intimidate Witnesses?

  • 4

    Does It Pay Off to Intimidate Witnesses?

  • 5

    Does It Pay Off to ‘Hack’ the

    Opponent?

  • 6

    Does It Pay Off to ‚Hack‘ the Opponent? Methanex v. United States

  • 7

    Does It Pay Off to ‚Hack‘ the Opponent? Methanex v. United States

    Methanex Corporation v. United States of America (UNCITRAL), Final Award of the Tribunal on Jurisdiction and Merits, 3 August 2005; Part II - Chapter I, para 54

  • 8

    Does It Pay Off to ‚Hack‘ the Opponent? Methanex v. United States

    Methanex Corporation v. United States of America (UNCITRAL), Final Award of the Tribunal on Jurisdiction and Merits, 3 August 2005; Part II - Chapter I, para 58

  • 9

    Does It Pay Off to ‚Hack‘ the Opponent? ConocoPhilips v. Venezuela

  • 10

    Does It Pay Off to ‚Hack‘ the Opponent? ConocoPhilips v. Venezuela

    ConocoPhillips Petrozuata BV et al v Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/30) Professor Abi-Saab’s Dissenting Opinion to the Decision on Respondent's Request for Reconsideration; paras 66 and 67

  • 11

    Does It Pay Off to ‚Hack‘ the Opponent? Caratube II v. Kazakhstan

  • 12

    Does It Pay Off to ‚Hack‘ the Opponent? Caratube II v. Kazakhstan

    Caratube International Oil Company LLP v. The Republic of Kazakhstan (ICSID Case No. ARB/08/12) Decision on Claimants’ Request for the Production of ‘Leaked Documents’, 27 July 2015 Decision unpublished – source: Global Arbitration Review

  • 13

    Does It Pay Off to ‚Hack‘ the Opponent? Caratube II v. Kazakhstan

    Caratube International Oil Company LLP v. The Republic of Kazakhstan (ICSID Case No. ARB/08/12) Decision on Claimants’ Request for the Production of ‘Leaked Documents’, 27 July 2015 Decision unpublished – source: Global Arbitration Review

    pro admission

    against admission

    pro admission

    legal privilege prevails

    pro admission

    irrelevant consideration

  • 14

    Does It Pay Off to ‘Hack’ the

    Opponent?

  • 15

    Does It Pay Off to Hold Off

    Evidence?

  • 16

    Does It Pay Off to Hold Off Evidence?

  • 17

    Does It Pay Off to Hold Off Evidence? EDF v. Romania

  • 18

    Does It Pay Off to Hold Off Evidence? EDF v. Romania

    EDF (Services) Limited v. Romania (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/13) Procedural Order No. 3, 29 August 2008; para 38

  • 19

    Does It Pay Off to Hold Off Evidence? EDF v. Romania

    EDF (Services) Limited v. Romania (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/13) Procedural Order No. 3, 29 August 2008; paras 47 and 48

  • 20

    Does It Pay Off to Hold Off Evidence? Fraport v. Philippines

  • 21

    Does It Pay Off to Hold Off Evidence? Fraport v. Philippines

    Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide v. Republic of the Philippines (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/25) Decision on the Application for Annulment of Fraport AG AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide, 23 December 2010; paras 197, 198 and 200

  • 22

    Does It Pay Off to Hold Off

    Evidence?

  • 23

    Evidence in Arbitration

    Does it Pay Off to Play Dirty?

    Victoria Pernt

    Slide Number 1Slide Number 2Slide Number 3Slide Number 4Slide Number 5Slide Number 6Slide Number 7Slide Number 8Slide Number 9Slide Number 10Slide Number 11Slide Number 12Slide Number 13Slide Number 14Slide Number 15Slide Number 16Slide Number 17Slide Number 18Slide Number 19Slide Number 20Slide Number 21Slide Number 22Slide Number 23