EVEN-ODD EFFECT IN THE YIELDS OF NUCLEAR-REACTION PRODUCTS
-
Upload
simone-gaines -
Category
Documents
-
view
18 -
download
0
description
Transcript of EVEN-ODD EFFECT IN THE YIELDS OF NUCLEAR-REACTION PRODUCTS
EVEN-ODD EFFECT IN THE YIELDS EVEN-ODD EFFECT IN THE YIELDS
OF NUCLEAR-REACTION PRODUCTSOF NUCLEAR-REACTION PRODUCTS
M. Valentina Ricciardi
GSI, Darmstadt, Germany
EVEN-ODD EFFECT IN THE YIELDS EVEN-ODD EFFECT IN THE YIELDS
OF NUCLEAR-REACTION PRODUCTSOF NUCLEAR-REACTION PRODUCTS
OUTLINE
Experimental evidence of even-odd staggering in the yields: common properties and differences
GSI results: a powerful overview
Understanding the even-odd staggering
Implications for the study of properties of hot nuclear matter
(Main consequences of our simple idea)
What is pairing?What is pairing?
The pairing interaction can be defined as an attractive (thus binding) residual interaction acting between two nucleons.
By pairing nucleons, the nuclear binding energy is increased compared to its value predicted by the independent-particle model.
Even-even nuclei have all nucleons paired and gain binding energy. Odd nuclei have always one unpaired nucleon.
The ground state (cold nucleus) corresponds to the most possible coherent motion of nucleons.
If I want to bring two paired nucleons in an excited state, I have to pay energy to break the pair.
The excited states correspond to configurations of the (hot) nucleus where a less coherent motion is achieved.
Il Gattopardo. Il ballo
Disco dancing
Consequences of pairingConsequences of pairing
The most evident consequence of pairing can be found in the nuclear binding energy.
Another rather evident (but not obvious) consequence of pairing is the even-odd effect in the yields of nuclear reactions....
Even-odd effect in the yields: What we are speaking Even-odd effect in the yields: What we are speaking aboutabout
We make a nuclear reaction and we observe the final productseffect structure staggering zigzagWithout pairing With pairing
Even-odd
Experimental evidence of even-odd staggering in the Experimental evidence of even-odd staggering in the yieldsyields
C. N. Knott et al., Phys. Rev. C 53 (1996) 347
40Ca + p
40Ar + target 44 A MeV
Ch. O. Bacri et al., Nucl. Phys. A 555 (1998) 477
Steinhäuser et al., Nuc. Phys.A 634 (1998) 89
low-energy fission
Sl. Cavallaro et al., Phys. Rev. C 57 (1998) 731
35Cl + 24Mg 8 A MeV
What do yields have in common in all these different reactions? What is different?
In common: an even-odd staggering is observedIndependent of the reaction mechanism PAIRING is responsible for the even-odd effect
Different: the characteristics of the staggering can be differentthe PHASE through which the nucleus is passing
superfluid
liquid
coexistence
gas
E*/MeV
5
7010 300
A25
0.5
T/M
eV
SUPERFLUIDThe nucleus warms up a bit and cools down without fully exiting the superfluid phase
LIQUIDThe nucleus warms up, enters the liquid phase, then it cools down by evaporation back into the superfluid phase
COEXISTENCE LIQUID-GASThe nucleus warms up, experiences a co-existence phase, then the liquid pieces cool down by evaporation back into the superfluid phase
EVEN-ODD STRUCTURE IN LOW-ENERGY FISSION
Results from e.m.-induced fission of 70 different secondary projectiles (Steinhäuser et al., Nuc. Phys.A 634 (1998) 89 K. H. Schmidt et al., Nucl. Phys. A 665 (2000) 221 )
Conclusion: Structural properties survive at low energy
(F. Rejmund et al., Nucl. Phys. A 678 (2000) 215-234)
SUPERFLUIDITY
Zfiss=90 Zfiss=89
de-excitation by fission / evaporation
cold fragment superfluid
compound nucleus
collision
E.g.: transfer, abrasion
LIQUID PHASE
we describe successfully some aspects of the nucleus as a liquid drop
Keep in mind!
Final nuclei observed in a great variety of nuclear reactions have experienced a de-excitation process (evaporation)!
Nuclei pass from the liquid to the superfluid state.
Nuclei pass from being "structureless" to "structurefull".
Evaporation residues: Which Evaporation residues: Which are the characteristics of this type of final yields?are the characteristics of this type of final yields?
C. N. Knott et al., Phys. Rev. C 53 (1996) 347
40Ca + p
Ch. O. Bacri et al., Nucl. Phys. A 555 (1998) 477
Yields of nuclei with even Z are enhanced
Yields of nuclides with even N=Z number are enhanced
Nowadays we can tell much more...
x2, x4 Bt2, t4 velocity
flight path
x2, t2
x4, t4
beam monitor
target
scintillator
scintillator
ionisationchamber
ionisationchamber
beam
2ZΔE
A/Z from time and position:
Z from IC:
cβBρ
m
e
Z
A
0
Experimental set-up at the FRagment Separator (FRS), GSI
A powerful overview: GSI dataA powerful overview: GSI data
Use of high-resolution magnetic spectrometers to measure production yields:
- full Z, A identification - entire production range - very precise measurement
Sequence:N-Z=constant
A powerful overview: GSI dataA powerful overview: GSI data
Fragmentation data:
1 A GeV 238U on Ti
● N=Z ■ N=Z+2 ▲N=Z+4 N=Z+6 Data reveal complex structural effects!
M. V. Ricciardi et al., Nucl. Phys. A 733 (2003) 299
● N=Z+1 ■ N=Z+3 ▲N=Z+5
Experimental results for Experimental results for 238238U fragmentationU fragmentation
C. Villagrasa-Canton et al., Phys. Rev. C 75 (2007)
044603
P. Napolitani et al., Phys. Rev. C 70 (2004)
054607
Same complex behavior observed in a large bulk
of new data.
Can we explain this complex behavior?Can we explain this complex behavior?
evaporation
cold fragment with structure
compound nucleus
collision
E.g.: transfer abrasion
without structure
We have this picture in mind:
The compound nucleus is hot and structureless
In each evaporation step the mass and excitation energy are reduced. The new compound nucleus is still structureless.
Only below Ecritical (~10 MeV) structural effect can exist
Below 10 MeV of excitation energy particle evaporation normally stops
we test the idea that pairing is restored in the last evaporation step, i.e. the even-odd effect in the yields is determined in the last evaporation step
How does particle evaporation proceeds?How does particle evaporation proceeds?
The dominant particle-decays in the last
evaporation step are n and p emission
o.o. o.e. e.e. e.o.
Svmother
Svmother
ground state
ground state
ground state
ground state
daughter mother daughter mother
Svdaughter Sv
daughter
Sv
2
o.o. o.e. e.e. e.o.
Svmother
Svmother
ground state
ground state
ground state
ground state
daughter mother daughter mother
Svdaughter Sv
daughter
Sv
2
o.o. o.e. e.e. e.o.
Svmother
Svmother
ground state
ground state
ground state
ground state
daughter mother daughter mother
Svdaughter Sv
daughter
Sv
2
o.o. o.e. e.e. e.o.
Svmother
Svmother
ground state
ground state
ground state
ground state
daughter mother daughter mother
Svdaughter Sv
daughter
Sv
2
o.o. o.e. o.e. /e.o. o.o. /e.e e.e. e.o. o.o. o.e. e.e. e.o.
Svmother
Svmother
ground state
ground state
ground state
ground state
daughter mother daughter mother
Svdaughter Sv
daughter
Sv
2
o.o. o.e. e.e. e.o.
Svmother
Svmother
ground state
ground state
ground state
ground state
daughter mother daughter mother
Svdaughter Sv
daughter
Sv
2
Understanding the staggering in the yieldsUnderstanding the staggering in the yields
Last step in the evaporation cascade (assuming only n and p evaporation)
The lowest particle separation energy is the key quantity!
The key role of the separation energyThe key role of the separation energy
"Energy range" = "Particle threshold" = min(Sn, Sp)
data from Audi-Wapstra
keV
The key role of the separation energyThe key role of the separation energy
The complex features of the even-odd staggering are reproduced in this fishbone pattern!
data from Audi-Wapstra
"Energy range" = "Particle threshold" = min(Sn, Sp)
Conclusions concerning the yields from nuclei Conclusions concerning the yields from nuclei in thein the LIQUID PHASE
The even-odd staggering of final nuclei which have experienced a de-excitation process (evaporation) is determined in the last evaporation step
in other words:
Structural properties do not survive in excited nuclei, but the pairing interaction is restored once the nucleus falls below the critical energy
The characteristics of the staggering correlate strongly with the lowest n p particle separation energy of the final experimentally observed nuclei.
Coexistence liquid-gas
Multifragmentation establishing the caloric curve
Heat bath at temperature T
Excitation energy: measured from the masses of observed final
fragments
Temperature: measured from the ratio of the yields of observed final
fragments
Temperature: a very important variableTemperature: a very important variable
Yield ~ e-Ei/kT
Heat bath at temperature T
light fragments
investigated
The temperature is determined by the Boltzmann factor.
The Boltzmann factor is a weighting factor that determines the relative probability of a state i in a multi-state system in thermodynamic equilibrium at temperature T.
The ratio of the probabilities of two states is given by the ratio of their Boltzmann factors.
kT
E
kT
EE
kT
E
kT
E
1
2
1
2 ee
e
e
Y
Y
p
p 12
2
1
Under the assumption that only (mostly) the ground state is populated, T can be deduced from the yields and the binding energies of two final fragments (ISOTOPE THERMOMETER).
Using very light final fragments for the thermometer, one hopes that close heavier fragments are also cold and do not evaporate(no SIDE FEEDING).
the ground state has highest probability to be populated
Even-odd effect in the yields of multifragmentation Even-odd effect in the yields of multifragmentation productsproducts
56Fe on Ti at 1000 A MeV P. Napolitani et al., Phys. Rev. C 70 (2004) 054607
We focus now on the very light nuclei, undoubtly attributed to multifragmentation.
Let us consider these 2 chains:
N=Z even-odd effect N=Z+1 odd-even effect
Following the footprints of the data...Following the footprints of the data...
Light multifragmentation products: Yield ~ e-E/T
Let's assume that evaporation does not play any role the staggering in the yields should be correlated to that in binding energies
N=Z
Staggering in binding energy (MeV) (BEexp from Audi Wapstra – BEcalc from pure LDM Myers, Swiatecky)
N=Z+1 ?
Production cross sections (mb) 56Fe on Ti at 1 A GeV
cross sections
binding energies binding energies
cross sections
Overview on the staggering in the binding energy
0 ½ 0 ½ 0 ½ 0 ½ 0 ½ ½ 1 ½ 1 ½ 1 ½ 2 ½ 10 ½ 0 ½ 0 ½ 0 ½ 0 ½ ½ 1 ½ 1 ½ 2 ½ 1 ½ 10 ½ 0 ½ 0 ½ 0 ½ 0 ½ ½ 1 ½ 2 ½ 1 ½ 1 ½ 10 ½ 0 ½ 0 ½ 0 ½ 0 ½ ½ 2 ½ 1 ½ 1 ½ 1 ½ 10 ½ 0 ½ 0 ½ 0 ½ 0 ½
oddZNfor2
oddoddfor1
evenoddfor2
1evenevenfor0
withAA
ZN
2
3
Extra binding energy associated with the presence of congruent pairs:
most bound
less bound
staggering in the ground-state energies
(Myers Swiatecki NPA 601, 1996, 141)
N=Z N=Z+1
e o e o e o e o e o
e
o
e
o
e
o
e
o
It is not the binding energy responsible for the staggering in the
cross sections
Expected even-odd staggering in evaporation residuesExpected even-odd staggering in evaporation residues
FISHBONE PATTERN
"Energy range" = min(Sn, Sp)
data from Audi-Wapstra
Staggering in yields vs. Staggering in yields vs. min(Sn,Sp)min(Sn,Sp)
Production cross sections (mb)Staggering in binding energy (MeV)Particle threshold = lowest particle separation energy (MeV)
The lowest particle separation energy reproduces perfectly the staggering
The even-odd staggering in the yields of evaporation residues does not correlate with the binding energies but with the lowest particle threshold!
the sequential de-excitation process plays a dominant role!
N=Z N=Z+1
cross sections cross sectionsparticle threshold
particle threshold
binding energiesbinding energies
Conclusions concerning the yields from nuclei Conclusions concerning the yields from nuclei in thein the COEXISTENCE PHASE
The even-odd staggering of final nuclei does not correlate with the binding energy
It is not the binding energy (pure Boltzmann approach) that is responsible for the staggering in the yields of multifragmentation process but the lowest particle separation energy
Even the yields of the lightest multifragmentation products (e.g. Li) are governed by evaporation (side feeding is relevant!)
Warning to all methods based on Boltzmann statistics when determining directly the properties of hot nuclear matter
SUMMARISING THE SIMPLE IDEA OF "PARTICLE THRESHOLD"SUMMARISING THE SIMPLE IDEA OF "PARTICLE THRESHOLD"
• All residual products (yields) from any reaction which passed through at least one evaporation step show an even-odd staggering
• The even-odd effect is complex even qualitatively
• The complex behavior of the even-odd staggering can be reproduced qualitatively by the lowest separation energy (threshold energy) but not by the binding energy
J. Hüfner, C. Sander and G. Wolschin, Phys. Let. 73 B (1978) 289.X. Campi and J. Hüfner, Phys. Rev. C 24 (1981) 2199.
Consequences of this simple idea...
1. consequence: a statistical evaporation code with correct ingredients (masses, level densities, competition of all possible channels –gamma emission-) should be able to reproduce the even-odd staggering
2. consequence: all other even-odd observables (e.g. Z distributions) do not contain any additional information and can be explained by the "fishbone pattern"
A complete statistical evaporation code: ABRABLA07A complete statistical evaporation code: ABRABLA07
A complete statistical evaporation code: ABRABLA07A complete statistical evaporation code: ABRABLA07
CONCLUSIONSCONCLUSIONS
The measurements of cross-sections of all nuclides (A,Z) in the entire production range made at FRS, GSI, offered the possibility for the 1st time to observe and systematically investigate the complexity of the even-odd effect in the yields
(Structural properties survive at low energies )
In nuclei which are the final products of an evaporation process, the even-odd structure is restored in the last evaporation step
It is not the binding energy that is responsible for the staggering in the yields; the characteristics of the staggering correlate strongly with the lowest n p particle separation energy of the final experimentally observed nuclei.
Even the yields of the lightest multifragmentation products (e.g. Li) are governed by evaporation (model independent!). Warning to all methods based on a pure Boltzmann approach when determining directly (neglecting evaporation) the properties of hot nuclear matter
A statistical model can reproduce (in principle) the complexity of the even-odd effect.
More complex effects (eg. anomaly) are in reality just a consequence of the observed characteristics of the even-odd effect in the individual yields.