Evaluation Technique
-
Upload
katell-reynolds -
Category
Documents
-
view
22 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Evaluation Technique
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
Percent of CFO's who always or almost always use a given technique
APV
Profitability index
Simulation analysis
Book rate of return
Real options
Discounted payback
P/E multiples
Sensitivity analysis
Payback
NPV
IRR
Evaluation Technique
Fig. 2. Survey evidence on the popularity of different capital budgeting methods.We report the percentage of CFOs who always or almost always use a particulartechnique. IRR represents Internal Rate of Return, NPV is Net Present Value, P/E is the Price to Earnings ratio, and APV is Adjusted Present Value. The surveyis based on the responses of 392 CFOs.
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
Percent of CFO's who always or almost always use a given method
Regulatory decisions
Investor expectations
Dividend discount Model
Multibeta CAPM
Arithmetic average historical return
CAPM
Cost of equitycapital method
Fig. 3. Survey evidence on the popularity of different methods to calculatethe cost of equity capital. We report the percentage of CFOs who always or almost always use a particular technique. CAPM represents the Capital Asset Pricing Model.The survey is based on the responses of 392 CFOs.
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
Percent of CFO's who always or almost always adjust for a given risk
Momentum
Market-to-book ratio
Distress
Term structure
Commodity price
Size
Unexpected inflation
GDP or business cycle
Foreign exchange
Interest rate
Market risk (beta)
Multibeta risks for adjustingdiscount rates or cash flows
Fig. 4. Survey evidence on types of multibeta risk that are important for adjustingcash flows or discount rates. We report the percentage of CFOs who always or almost always adjust for a particular type of risk. The survey is based on the responses of 392 CFOs.
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Percent of CFO's identifying factor as important or very important
Customer/supplier comfort
Bankruptcy/distress costs
Comparable firm debt levels
Equity undervaluation/overvaluation
Transactions costs and fees
Interest tax savings
Level of interest rates
Insufficient internal funds
Earnings and cash flow volatility
Credit rating
Financial flexibility
Fig. 5. Survey evidence on some of the factors that affect the decision to issue debt. The surveyis based on the responses of 392 CFOs.
Debt policy factors
No target ratio or range19%
Somewhat tight target/range
34%Very strict target10%
Flexible target37%
Fig. 6. Survey evidence on whether firms have optimal or target debt-equity ratios. The surveyis based on the responses of 392 CFOs.
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Percent of CFO's identifying factor as important or very important
Favorable investor impression vs. issuing debt
Similar amount of equity as same-industry firms
Sufficiecny of recent profits to fund activities
Stock is our "least risky" source of funds
Diluting holdings of certain shareholders
Maintaining target debt/equity ratio
Providing shares to employee bonus/option plans
If recent stock price increase, selling price "high"
Magnitude of equity undervaluation/overvaluation
Earnings per share dilution
Fig. 7. Survey evidence on some of the factors that affect the decision to issue common stock. The surveyis based on the responses of 392 CFOs.
Common stock factors
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Percent of CFO's identifying factor as important or very important
Protect bondholders against unfavorable actions by managers orstockholders
Other industry firms successfully use convertibles
Less expensive than straight debt
To attract investors unsure about riskiness
Avoiding short-term equity dilution
Ability to "call"/force conversion if/when necessary
Stock currently undervalued
Inexpensive way to issue "delayed" common stock
Fig. 8. Survey evidence on the factors that affect the decision to issue convertible debt. The surveyis based on the responses of 392 CFOs.
Convertible debt factors