Collaboration and Evaluation in Urban Sustainability and ...
Evaluation Sustainability
-
Upload
living-labs-in-southern-africa -
Category
Documents
-
view
1.167 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Evaluation Sustainability
01/03/2011 2
http://www.newsweek.com/feature/2010/the-world-s-best-countries.html
Evaluation, Sustainability, Quality
Management
in Relation to the Context and Situation
Lessons learned from:
▶ Active and Healthy
Ageing in EU
▶ Lessons learned in
Japan, Taiwan and China
▶ Laurea LivingLabs – Unit
of Excellence: FAO/UN
initiative
▶ European Network of
LivingLabs – criteria &
PPPP initiative
3/1/2011 Laurea University of Applied Sciences 3
Platform Breaking Down Barriers Between Key Players at Regional Level
Laurea LivingLabs Network with the Helsinki - Uusimaa region as
an open innovation ecosystem based on human centric RDI
European Innovation Partnerships – meeting societal challenges and reinforcing
competitiveness
Simulation Seminar for ERAC regarding the pilot "Active and Healthy Ageing”
Ways of identifying and tackling obstacles to Innovation
22nd of February, 2011
Berlaymont building, room Schuman, 200 rue de la Loi, Brussels
Tuija Hirvikoski, PhDDirector| Laurea University of Applied Sciences| Internationalisation of RDI | ENoLL council member and co-ordinator of the thematic domains | Sendai-
Finland Wellbeing Centre steering group member |
| [email protected] | www.laurea.fi | http://www.openlivinglabs.eu/ | http://vimeo.com/16424693| http://sendai.fwbc.jp/en/index.html |
EUROPEAN COMMISSIONDIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR RESEARCH & INNOVATION
Directorate C - Research and Innovation
Unit C.1 – Innovation Policy
New Collaborative Innovation Paradigm, Why?
• due to the multi-layered,
multidisciplinary, multi-
sector, multi-stakeholder
complexities
• we need to improve the
effectiveness and impact of
policies, programmes and
projects
• apart from new
technologies and
products, we also need
new production and
consumptions that will
renew local and global
services, markets and
industries and we want
to effect human
behaviour
3/1/2011 Laurea University of Applied Sciences 5
New Collaborative Innovation Paradigm
How?
LivingLabs =
enlarged Triple Helix model & open
Research, Development and
Innovation (RDI) infrastructures and
methodologies
Learning and Co-Innovating for
Development
local, regional and cross-
boarder collaboration
addressing the grand
challenges
3/1/2011 Laurea University of Applied Sciences 6
Hirvikoski (2009)
Lessons learned from EU
Active and Healthy ageing
wanted
• system level thinking,
holistic and systemic
solutions
• capacity to orchestrate
and scale the
innovation up from the
local level to the
national/system level
because of
• fragmentation of the
market /non-existing
market
• overlapping RDI
• need to boost the
transformation of the
professionals‟, clients‟ and
citizens‟ behaviour
• to boost societal innovation
3/1/2011 Laurea University of Applied Sciences 7
Lessons Learned in Japan,
China and Taiwan
• Sendai-Finland
Wellbeing Centre
• from push marketing
towards open RDI across
Finnish &Japanese
stakeholders
• Active Ageing in
Shanghai
• systemic, holistic
solution across 16
Finnish companies and
Chinese authorities
• Cultivating Talent and
Transformation of the
Innovation Ecosystem
of Taiwan
• high tech
• people driven (Biking
and social media in a
Hakka community)
• integrating tradition and
high tech (Dharma
Drum)
3/1/2011 Laurea University of Applied Sciences 8
Kanter (1988) Innovation is most likely in
organizations that
(a) have integrative structures,
(b) emphasize diversity,
(c) have multiple structural linkages inside and outside the organization,
(d) have intersecting territories,
(e) have collective pride and faith in people‟s talent, and
(f) emphasize collaboration and teamwork.
Type of, radicalism of and maturity
of innovation, e.g.
TH2009
Cultivating Smart Living Talents in
Higher Education
International Forum on
Smart Living Summer School Initiatives in Asia
January 14, 2011
Taipei, Taiwan
Tuija Hirvikoski, PhD, Laurea University of Applied Sciences
European Network of Living Labs, co-coordinator of the thematic domain
Laurea with multiple Centre of
Excellence awards
in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area
Smart Living/Cities
Challenges and Solutions in the rapidly
changing world1. What is needed for smart living in smart cities?
2. What kind of an innovation process are we taking
about?
3. Abilities and skills needed? (Professionals and
students)
4. Challenges for higher education (and
other stakeholders....)
5. The future in the world without
borders
January 14, 2011, Taipei , Taiwan International Forum on Smart Living Summer School Initiatives in Asia Tuija Hirvikoski 12
3/1/2011 Laurea University of Applied Sciences 13
About the Smart
City Solutions
based on Industrial
University
collaboration
See theHelsinki Smart City
Showcase
http://vimeo.com/16424693
and
http://www.openlivinglabs.eu/
The current status and the future trend on smart
living education
ENoLL, European Network of LivingLabs▶ http://www.openlivinglabs.eu/
▶ http://www.openlivinglabs.eu/news/enoll-5th-wave
▶ http://vimeo.com/17515676
▶ http://www-sop.inria.fr/teams/axis/LLSS2010/ecoleLL/
Laurea Learning by Developing (LbD) model with the best employment rate.
FINHEEC: “the model can set an example for the whole Finland” ▶ The Finnish Higher Education Evaluation Council http://www.kka.fi/index.phtml?l=en&s=82
Laurea University of Applied Sciences International Advisory Board▶ http://www.laurea.fi/internet/en/03_information_on_Laurea/02_group/06_News/97_2010/International_experts_invited_as_Laurea_s_Honorary
_Research_Fellows/index.jsp
and compared to what was learned from the colleagues in ITRI (i236), III,
and The Talent Cultivation Program for Smart Living Industry
• INSIGHT Suan-Lien Elderly Centre (Prof. Lin and Prof. Kang) – Care home LL
• Touch Centre (Prof. Jeng and Prof. Yang) Showroom & future learning environment LL
• Eco-City (Prof. Lin) Biking and social media supporting economical, social and cultural
development in rural area
January 14, 2011, Taipei , Taiwan International Forum on Smart Living Summer School Initiatives in Asia Tuija Hirvikoski 14
Harvesting Results
|Virtual Elderly Care Services | A Guardian
Angel for the Extended Home Environment
| DiYSE | CaringTV | Clinic Art & Encounter
Art | Active Aging |Express to Connect
(E2C) | Polar heart rate monitoring devises
| Helsinki Metropolitan Entrepreneurship
Academy | Radiology and Laboratory
Service System | Senior Trainer |
Konkkaronkka | Sendai-Finland Wellbeing
Centre | Nordic Walking in Japan | 250 new
companies in social service and healthcare
sector
Laurea’s Operating Environment
• the Greater Helsinki Metropolitan Area produces
approximately 50% of Finland‟s gross domestic
product
• Uusimaa region consists of urban and rural areas• The social and health care sector is strongly influenced by demographic changes and
struggling with the challenge of ensuring equal services for rural and urban areas with
limited budgetary conditions. The ageing population, long distances and the possible
lack of qualified work force are common challenges in particularly in the archipelago
• In its operating environment, Laurea is specializing
in service innovations and focusing on regional
development of the metropolitan area
3/1/2011 Laurea University of Applied Sciences16
Helsinki Smart City Showcase
http://vimeo.com/16424693
Laurea’s LivingLabs Network
and the partners in the Uusimaa Region
3/1/2011 Laurea University of Applied Sciences 17
Strategic Intent 2015:
In 2015 Laurea will be
an internationally
acknowledged
university of applied
sciences specializing
in future expertise
and regional
development in the
metropolitan area.
Active Life Village
Service Innovation and Design Lab
Care Innovation and Design Hub
User Driven Innovation Centre
Medical and Care Simulation Centre
The focus of the LivingLabs is on welfare,
knowledge intensive business services, security
and social responsibility. The basis for Laurea’s
R&D&I is a holistic view of well-being which
provides sustainable direction for businesses and
for the development of entire service systemsCKIR /Aalto
Forum Virium
OtaniemiMarketing
Culminatum
Hospital AreaHyri and TechVilla
Uusimaa Regional Council
HUS, THL
Political
guidelines
Institutional
enviromentDesign
environment
Developer
Execution
enviroment
User
Personal
meanings
Utilizer
Business
environment
Strategic
environment
EnablersNew Technologies, products, services,
New production and consumption
spin-offs,
User behavior transformation
renewal of markets, industries and societies
orchestration
table
Learning by Developing (LbD) with an open RDI Ecosystem =
Laurea LivingLabs
professional development
LbD = student-centric research and
development work integrated into
learning
• LbD is a system of learning and human development that
mobilizes and harnesses human creative talent en masse. It is a
learning system that integrates education with research,
development and innovation operations (RDI); consequently, it
fuels our collective creativity. In addition, it provides each
student the tools to develop and utilize his or her creative
talents fully in order to generate a livelihood for him or herself
and to foster productivity for society as a whole• http://www.laurea.fi/internet/en/031_quality/01/05_development/02_operational_development/05_benchm
arking_evaluation_audit/centre_of_excellence_evaluation_2009.jsp
La http://www.slideshare.net/tuihirv/laurea-living-labs
January 14, 2011, Taipei , Taiwan International Forum on Smart Living Summer School Initiatives in Asia Tuija Hirvikoski 19
Learning by Developing – a
Unique Way to Study
• The working life oriented learning method Learning by Developing is a pedagogical innovation developed by Laurea.
• The LbD -projects are conducted in partnership with the world of industry and commerce, which means that authentic workplace issues are selected as subjects of studying.
• For students LbD is a new way to get the competence needed in working life: they grow from learners into experts with excellent employment opportunities within their specific fields.
3/1/2011 Laurea University of Applied Sciences 20
Feedback on Laurea Centre of
Excellence (FINHEEC)
• The students„ participation in R&D has been raised to a new level,
so that they are now the main activating forces in the process
• supported by Laurea's management and it is purposefully developed
throughout the organisation
• a vision-based management model - incentivising for staff -
communities of experts based on the interests of the parties
involved
• a regional operator and partner in the metropolitan area - in
continuous interaction with the environment
• many of the articles and conference presentations have involved
students
• Laurea has determined the core competences included in all of its
degree programmes, taken into account the context of each degree
in curriculum development, and improved competence evaluation
procedures3/1/2011 21
Feedback on Centre of Excellence
• Laurea has defined its core competence in relation to the operating
environment's competence needs in terms of areas of focus, from which it has
also derived the core competences for each degree programme
• The Learning by Developing core process strives to bring together employers
and the workplace, employment-related research and development, and
learning. Student-centric R&D is the connecting link between Laurea's three
main tasks, when the students' projects are aimed at developing employment
in the local region.
• In feedback, students especially mentioned the possibility of doing the right
tasks in projects, and the appropriateness of their studies. Another strength
that was mentioned was the improvement of team work and interaction skills,
although imbalances in the degree of participation appear to be a challenge
for teachers to tackle in the active student community and the commitment-
demanding study model.
• One of the particular strengths of R&D activities at Laurea University of
Applied Sciences is the role of students as central actors and takers of
responsibility.3/1/2011 22
Feedback on Centre of Excellence
• Despite the strong emphasis on R&D, theory and practice are well balanced
in the education. Student-centric R&D is particularly well suited to
universities of applied sciences, and Laurea can set an example for the whole
of Finland.
• The generally high level of results indicates that student-centric R&D is a
good choice for pedagogy
• Laurea produces the highest number of ECTS credits from R&D. In addition,
the students' participation in publication, project preparation and even
project management activities proves that they are central actors in Laurea's
R&D operations.
• Other strengths are Laurea's open interaction with its operating environment,
its agility in responding to the needs of the environment, and the apparent
functionality of its management model.
3/1/2011 23
Shared leadership based on interaction
Leaders and professors provide
• an empowering vision and
meaningful storylines
• support and trust those with ideas
and an entrepreneurial anxiety and
capabilities to make the ideas to
work in reality
• create platforms and trust based
opportunities for collaboration and
co-creation
Crewmembers (staff and students)
• participate into the interactive
leaderships e.g. by forecasting,
proposing, carrying the
responsibilities
• are curious about opportunities and
search for solutions
• empower their peers and leaders
January 14, 2011,
Taipei , Taiwan
International Forum on Smart Living Summer
School Initiatives in AsiaTuija Hirvikoski 24
True transformations evolve organically: new innovations emerge, new systems of technology and infrastructure are put in place, and new patterns of
living and working gradually take shape and begin to remake the economic landscape.
New Collaborative Innovation Paradigm, How?
Cross-boarder collaboration
In the world without boarders, the diversity of cultures, technologies
and business models nurtures innovation and learning
New opportunities emerge whilst ideas, knowledge and innovation
travel from country to country
New Collaborative Innovation
Paradigm. How?European Network of Living Labs
(ENoLL) was founded in 2006 under
the auspices of the Finnish EU-
presidency
• contributes to the creation of a
dynamic, multi-layered and
multidimensional, future European
innovation ecosystem
• supports co-creative, human-centric
and user-driven research,
development and innovation in order
to better cater for people‟s needs
3/1/2011 Laurea University of Applied Sciences 26
Hirvikoski (2009)
All current 212 Living Labs listed on
www.openlivinglabs.eu/livinglabs
Average growth of turnover in Danish firms, 2005-2007 (Source: Fora & Statistics Denmark, 2010)
New Collaborative Innovation Paradigm
How?The long term vision on Public-
Private-People Partnerships (PPPP)
for user-driven open innovation
includes:
• Living Labs as Open Access
Platforms for Smart Cities and
Regions
• Alliances with Local Authorities to
integrate Living Lab Innovation and
Sustainability Policies
• Cross-border and Cross-Thematic
Cooperation addressing the grand
challenges of our time
• Large-scale User Behaviour
Transformation through Social and
Societal Innovation
3/1/2011 Laurea University of Applied Sciences 28
Europe as a dynamic, multi-layered and
multi-dimensional European Innovation
Ecosystem
Living Lab Partnerships
City- and Regional
Governments
Social Networks
Citizens Groups
Universities
Research Institutions
SMEs
ICT Industries
International Organizations
FAO, UN, World Bank, OECD
International Partnerships
with Living Labs in other Regions
European Union
3/1/2011 Laurea University of Applied Sciences 30
The ENoLL 5th Wave
of Membership
Jesse Marsh
5wave Coordinator
01-03-2011 31Ghent, 14 December 2010 31The ENoLL 5th Wave of Membership
A non-profit association established under Belgian law –
AISBL
General Assembly of Effective Members
Elected Council of max 21 Members
President, Vice-Presidents, Treasurers, Secretary
elected by the Council
Thematic Domain Networks, Working Groups, etc. open
to participation by all members
ENoLL: a Legal Entity
29.02.2011 LLiSA
01-03-2011 32Ghent, 14 December 2010 32The ENoLL 5th Wave of Membership
Adherent members
▶ Living Labs having passed an Wave evaluation
Effective members
▶ Adherent members having paid a membership fee
Associate members
▶ Non-LLs (eg University, public authority, etc.) paying the
membership fee
An administration services fee may be introduced as of
2011
Membership in ENoLL
29.02.2011 LLiSA
01-03-2011 33Ghent, 14 December 2010 33The ENoLL 5th Wave of Membership
Send an email to [email protected] stating
▶ Organisation name
▶ Web address
▶ Applicant country
▶ Contact person details
You will receive a unique registration number and the
official Membership Application Form
Pre-registration
29.02.2011 LLiSA
01-03-2011 34Ghent, 14 December 2010 34The ENoLL 5th Wave of Membership
Evaluation teams constituted from ENoLL members and
LLs
3 members per team from different countries
Proposals divided by team excluding represented
countries
Team Leaders collaborate to ensure common criteria
X-Team cross-evaluates to ensure coherence
Evaluation process
29.02.2011 LLiSA
01-03-2011 35Ghent, 14 December 2010 35The ENoLL 5th Wave of Membership
Max 8 pages, max 1 Mb pdf, no annexes
Send to [email protected]
Deadline: 15 March 2011, 24:00 hours CET
Submission constitutes:
▶ Expression of interest to join ENoLL AISBL
▶ Permission to ENoLL to hold data for evaluation purposes
▶ Permission to ENoLL to make information public unless
otherwise notified by 15 March 2011
Submission
29.02.2011 LLiSA
01-03-2011 36Ghent, 14 December 2010 36The ENoLL 5th Wave of Membership
Basic facts
Membership motivation
Description and characteristics
Organisation
Openness
Resources
Users and Reality
Value
Direction and Plans for the Future
Application Form
29.02.2011 LLiSA
01-03-2011 37Ghent, 14 December 2010 37The ENoLL 5th Wave of Membership
Proposals are then evaluated against 20 criteria grouped
into 5 categories
▶ Organisation
▶ Openness
▶ Resources
▶ Users & Reality
▶ Value
No targets, no quotas: proposals evaluated strictly on
merit
Evaluation Criteria
29.02.2011 LLiSA
Enoll- Evaluation Criteria
• Evidence of co-created values from research,
development and innovation
• Values/Services offered/provided to LL actors
• Measures to involve users
• Reality of usage contexts, where the LL runs its
operations
• User-centricity within the entire service process
Enoll- Evaluation Criteria
Full product lifecycle support - capability & maturity
LL covers several entities within value-chain(s)
Quality of user-driven innovation methods and tools
Availability of required technology and/or testbeds
Evidence of expertise gained from the LivingLab
operations
Commitment to open processes
IPR principles supporting capability and openness
Enoll- Evaluation Criteria
• Openness towards new partners & investors
• Business-citizens-government partnership –strength &
maturity
• Organization of LL governance, management & operations
• Business model for LL sustainability
• Interest and capacity to be active in EU Innovation system
• International networking experience and capability
• Channels (web etc) supporting public visibility and
interaction
• People/Positions dedicated to LL management& operations
01-03-2011 41Ghent, 14 December 2010 41The ENoLL 5th Wave of Membership
Evaluation results submitted to ENoLL Council for
validation and final decisions
Candidates informed of evaluation results at least 30
days prior to official announcement
Launch event scheduled 16 May in Budapest under the
auspices of the Hungarian Presidency
Selection and announcement
29.02.2011 LLiSA
01-03-2011 42Ghent, 14 December 2010 42The ENoLL 5th Wave of Membership
Pre-register via email to obtain the registration number
and Application Form
Submit the completed application by
15 March 2011
Complex yet transparent and accountable evaluation
process taking over one month
Official launch of successful new members at Hungarian
Presidency event in Budapest
Summary
29.02.2011 LLiSA
01-03-2011 43Ghent, 14 December 2010 43The ENoLL 5th Wave of Membership
ENoLL Portal at www.openlivinglabs.eu
▶ In-depth description of ENoLL: organisation, working
groups, membership, etc.
▶ Info and FAQ section on 5° Wave call
▶ For ENoLL members, access to dissemination kit to
promote the 5° wave
▶ For everyone, subscription to the ENoLL newsletter for
the latest updates
For further information
29.02.2011 LLiSA
01-03-2011 44Ghent, 14 December 2010 44The ENoLL 5th Wave of Membership
Jesse Marsh, 5° wave coordinator
Álvaro Oliveira and Mikael Börjeson, Task Force core
group
Pieter Balloon and Anna Kivilehto, secretarial support
The ENoLL evaluation team
Thank you for your attention
29.02.2011 LLiSA
- Reviewers download all (~18) applications assigned to his/hers team
from web (see above)
- Review team first checks the eligibility criteria for each application.
- Each reviewer reads and grades their applications (each appl graded
by three reviewers).
- It is recommended to use the review result template (principals from
Jesse) in 4WB sheet "Grade"
- The team compiles results from all three reviewers and fill in the
result in sheet "Appl"
- The entire workbook with filled in EligCriteria and Grades (5 Cat/appl)
is sent to me by 23 Feb.
- Please "channel" remarks/questions to me via your team leader.
PROPOSED PRINCIPAL PROCESS
for the evaluators
Apollon - Homecare and Independent Living
Experiences of SMEs
▶ Evaluates the different services in another country – forces to re-think the initial business case
▶ Provides a “lessons learned” in transferring or setting-up cross border Homecare and Independent products – better value proposition and better product fit
▶ provides opportunity to discuss the Health care eco-system in another country to identity different needs and to explore new business opportunities
▶ provides insights into the requirements and operational issues related to transferring products to other markets outside the base market
Innovating, Televic
Elderly Welfare Promotion Group, National Taiwan University INSIGHT
Suan-Lien Living Lab
Innovations of Long-Term Care Services for the Elderly in Chuncheon,
Hallym University, Korea
Connecting the Dots of Excellence across European and Asian Aging Societies
East Asian civicsocietal model
Northern European
welfare model
What is the role of the citizens, users, and people ?How does the public, private, people partnership evolve?
LivingLabs/Testbeds role?
Comparative research
City/region level
analysis
scaling up the results
to the system level
=> new products, services and solutions to be scaled up from the micro level to the system level and to the global market
Connecting the Dots of Excellence across
European and Asian Aging Societies
Pre-Commercial Procurement Good Practice
Procure R&D in steps (solutions, prototypes, test
series) to reduce the risk and give SMEs a
chance
Risk-benefit sharing with Suppliers
Competing development with multiple Suppliers
Sharing R&D costs with other Procurers
PPPP for Active and Healthy Aging –
evaluation of inputs, process, results,
impacts
Action Through a Policy
Mix
Improving Co-ordination
of Key Players
Europe as a dynamic,
multi-layered and
multi-dimensional
Innovation Ecosystem:
impacts
3/1/2011 Laurea University of Applied Sciences 50
Lessons Learned - Action Through a Policy Mix
- enabling health and social care policy, educational policy,
industrial and innovation policy (management by vision,
evaluation and incentives)
integration of education and RDI to foster motivated professionals
integration of bottom-up (demand and human driven, self-organising)
and top-down (scalable, transferable solutions) approaches
parallel incremental development and systemic paradigm sift of
active and healthy aging (care systems, health behaviour, societal
innovation etc.)
enhancing innovation in pre-commercial public purchasing processes
& sustainable urban innovations through multidisciplinary R&D
cooperation (as The Innovative City® Program)
simultaneous innovative procurement and support for growth
companies => business expansion, generates new job opportunities
3/1/2011 Laurea University of Applied Sciences 51
Lessons Learned - Improving the Coordination of
Key Players by PPPP
• enabling structures and platforms (LivingLabs) to address
the multi-stakeholder, multi-layer, multi-disciplinary, multi-
sector complexities => effectiveness and impact of policies
• proactive platform activators => trust, coherent value
bases, good collaboration among stakeholders => strategic
agility
• empower the elderly, citizens, care professionals and
students => innovative solutions & diffusion of innovation
• connect the dots of excellence across European and Asian
aging societies
Scaling up the PPPP model: Europe as a dynamic,
multi-layered and multi-dimensional Innovation
Ecosystem - Consequences
3/1/2011 Laurea University of Applied Sciences 53
- involves creative and motivated professionals and citizens
to the development of Active and Healthy Ageing solutions
and the transformation of behaviour
- creates innovative solutions from the micro to the most
macro level of the Active and Healthy Ageing systems
- decreases innovation obstacles
- boosts Europe as a lead market of Active and Healthy Aging
- boosts new spin-offs and supports growth companies
- gives companies an opportunity to grow in the emerging
Asian (global) markets
- generates meaningful new jobs
January 14, 2011, Taipei , Taiwan International Forum on Smart Living Summer School Initiatives in Asia Tuija Hirvikoski 54
Image Tuija
Thank you