EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

68
EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY/ANGIOGRAPHY DEEPAK NANDAN

description

EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION. ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY/ANGIOGRAPHY DEEPAK NANDAN. “SYSTOLE”- CONTRACTION “DIASTOLE”-TO SEND APART. Systolic function is affected by preload afterload,contractility and heart rate. Asynchronous systolic contraction also may affect systolic function. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

Page 1: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY/ANGIOGRAPHY

DEEPAK NANDAN

Page 2: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

“SYSTOLE”- CONTRACTION

“DIASTOLE”-TO SEND APART

Page 3: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION
Page 4: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

Systolic function is affected by preload afterload,contractility and heart rate.

Asynchronous systolic contraction also may affect systolic function

Page 5: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

Quantitative echo◦ LV VOLUME

◦ LV MASS

◦ EJECTION INDICES

STROKE VOLUME EJECTION FRACTION FRACTIONAL SHORTENING VELOCITY OF CIRCUMFERENCIAL FIBRE

SHORTENING

LV SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

Page 6: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

Quantify LV function -MODES

M-Mode Modified Simpson’s Method Single plane area-length method Velocity of Circumferential Shortening Mitral Annular Excursion E-point to septal separation Rate of rise of MR jet Index of myocardial performance Subjective assessment

Page 7: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

M-Mode Quantification Use Parasternal Short-Axis or Long-Axis

views to measure LVEDD and LVESD

May take several measurements at different levels and calculate average

Assumes that no significant regional wall motion abnormalities are present

Page 8: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION
Page 9: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

Uncorrected (LVEDD)² - (LVESD)² LVEF = ----------------- X 100 (LVEDD)²

If apical contractility is normal

Corrected LVEF = Unc LVEF +(100 – Unc LVEF) X

15%)

5% hypokinetic, 0% akinetic, -5% dyskinetic, -10% aneurysm

Page 10: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

Global Myocardial Function

• Fractional shortening (FS)– Assumes symmetric

contraction

• Ejection fraction (EF)

LVED LVESFS

LVED

2 2

2

LVED LVESEF

LVED

Page 11: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

M-MODE-LINEAR MEASUREMENTS

Page 12: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

EPSS

GRADUAL CLOSURE OF AORTIC VALVE

MEAN Vcf-rate of shortening of LV

INDIRECT M-MODE MARKERS

Page 13: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

EPSSNORMAL ≤6mm

EF<50% >7mm

EF≤35% ≥13mm

Page 14: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION
Page 15: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

Mitral Annular Excursion toward LV Apex

M-mode tracings in systole The magnitude of systolic motion is

proportional to the longitudinal shortening of the LV

Normal mitral annular systolic motion is 8mm+ (average 12 +/- 2 on apical4 or apical 2 views)

If motion is < 8 mm, the EF is likely < 50%

Page 16: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

Velocity of Circumferential shortening Vcf is the mean velocity of LV shortening

through the minor axis

Vcf = FS/ET

ET is the time between LV isovolumetric contraction and isovolumetric relaxation

Measure by obtaining M-mode of AV opening to AV closure, aortic flow by doppler, or by an external pulse recording of carotid artery

NL values are > 1.0 c/s Slow Vcf may suggest diminished systolic

function

Page 17: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

2-D MEASUREMENTS

Page 18: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

Ejection Fraction

• Quantitative

- accuracy, reproducibility limited

- assumes shape of LV cavity

- best in symmetric ventricles

Page 19: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

SIMPSONS RULE\ RULE OF DISC

Page 20: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

Simpson’s Rule – the biplane method of disks

Volume left ventricle

- manual tracings in systole and

diastole

- area divided into series of disks

- volume of each disc(πr2x h )

summed = ventricular volume

LV-ED LV-ES

A4C

A2C

LV-ED LV-ES

Page 21: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION
Page 22: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION
Page 23: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

LEFT VENTRICULAR MASS

Page 24: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

TEICHOLZ /CUBED FORMULA

Page 25: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

LV Mass Quantification 2D M-Mode method using parasternal short axis view or

parasternal long axis view

Assumes that LV is ellipsoid (2:1 long/short axis ratio)

Measurements made at end diastole

ASE approved cube formula: LV mass (g) = 1.04 [(LVID + PWT + IVST)3 - (LVID)3] X 0.8 + 0.6 LV mass index (g/m2) = LV mass / BSA

Small errors in M-Mode cause large errors in mass values. Can have off axis/tangential cuts due to motion.

Page 26: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

LV Mass Quantification

LV mass = 1.04[(IVS + LVID + PWT)3 – (LVID)3] – 13.6 g

NL LV mass index for males: 93±22g/m2

NL LV mass index for females: 76±18g/m2

Page 27: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

LV MASS BY 2-D

Page 28: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION
Page 29: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

RWT = 2(PWT/LVID)

Page 30: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

REGIONAL LEFT VENT FUNCTION

Page 31: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

Regional Myocardial Function

• Assessment of motion of regions of the myocardium

• Useful for detection of myocardial ischemia– Leads to decreased or

paradoxical motion of the wall in affected areas

• Regions can be roughly mapped to coronary arteries

Page 32: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

NONISCHEMIC RWMA

Page 33: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

DIFF ISCHEMIC VS NONISCHEMIC

Page 34: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

LBBB

Page 35: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

DOPPLER EVALUVATION OF GLOBAL LVF

Page 36: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

SCHEMATIC REP OF ASSESSMENT OF LV VOL

Page 37: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

Stroke Volume and Cardiac Output

Flow = Cross sectional area (CSA) x Average velocity

Average velocity not usually measured directly

VTI = velocity-time integral

Area under the velocity curve for a single beatRepresents ‘stroke distance’

SV = VTI * CSA

Page 38: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

Stroke Volume Measurement

Measurement of VTIMeasurement of CSA

Page 39: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

Accurate measurement of CSA◦ Weakest link in the calculation◦ VTI very good for assessing change in cardiac

output with therapy, by following changes in VTI, since CSA is largely invariant in an individual

Measures forward flow only◦ Regurgitant fraction not considered◦ May over-estimate systemic cardiac output

Echocardiographic window in mechanically ventilated patients may be poor

Pitfalls in Echo Calculation of CO

Page 40: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

WALL STRESS

Page 41: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

LEFT VENTRICULAR dp/dt

Page 42: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

CW doppler to measure rate of rise of MR jet may correlate to LVEFA slow rate of rise may indicate poor systolic functionMust have MR present, and good doppler study present (more difficult with eccentric jets)

Page 43: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

INDEX

OF MYOCARDIAL PERFORMANCE

Page 44: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

Index of Myocardial Performance Uses systolic and diastolic time intervals to evaluate global ventricular performanceSystolic dysfunction causes prolonged isovolumetric contraction time (ICT) and a shortened ejection time (ET). IMP = (ICT + IRT)/ET

Page 45: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

Index of Myocardial Performance Normal LV: 0.39 +/- 0.05 LV, DCM: 0.59 +/- 0.10 Normal RV: 0.28 +/- 0.04 Primary Pulm Htn: 0.93 +/- 0.34

Use PW of AV inflow signal, or CW to get AV regurgitant signal

Also need to measure interval between AV closure and opening (AVco)

PW or CW to capture semilunar outflow signal to measure ejection time (ET)

IMP = (AVco – ET)/ET

Page 46: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

Summary LV Mass Quantification: M-mode, Area-

length method, Truncated ellipsoid method, and Subjective assessment.

LV Volume Quantification: M-mode,

Subjective assessment

LV Function Quantification: Modified Simpson’s and Subjective Assessment by region.Also by M-mode, Single plane area length method, Velocity of Circumferential Shortening, Mitral Annular Excursion, EPSS, Rate of Rise of MR jet, Index of myocardial performance, etc

Page 47: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

ANGIOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF LV FUNCTION

Page 48: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION
Page 49: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION
Page 50: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

Amout of passive tension or strectch on the ventricular walls prior to systole

This load determines end diastolic sarcomere length and force of contraction

This inturn decides stroke volume and cardiac output

LV PRELOAD

Page 51: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

Afterload is the wall stress during ejection

Three major components are-peripheral resistance,arterial compliance,& peak intraventricular pressure.

Contractility is the inherent property of the myocardium to contract independent of the changes in pre & afterload

AFTERLOAD AND CONTRACTILITY

Page 52: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

CONTRACTILITY INDICES

Isovolumic indices Maximum dp/dt Maximum (dp/dt)/p Vpm or peak([dp/dt]/28p) (dp/dt)/Pd at Pd=40 mm hg

Ejection phase indices LVSW LVSWI EF MNSER(mean normalised syst eject rate) Mean Vcf

EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC PERFO

Page 53: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

Dp/dt-max rate of rise of LV systolic pressure-oldest & widely used

Nl-1610±290 mmHg/sec

Isovolumic indices

Page 54: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

EJECTION INDICES

Page 55: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

Area within PV diagrams-most accurate

Other methods

LVSW=(LVSP−LVDP)SV(0.0136)LVSP&LVDP=MEAN SYST/DIAST PRSV=STROKE VOL IN ml0.0136=for converting mm Hg-ml into g-m

LVSW

Page 56: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

LVSW –good measure in the absence of vol or pressure overload

Nl-90±30g-m

Values ≤25 indicate severe Lv syst failure & <20 prognosis is grave.

But reflects syst performance only when ventricle is homogenous in consistency-DCMP

In ext MI LVSW may be depressed even if contractility is normal

LVSW=(AoSP−PCWP)SV(0.0136)

Page 57: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

Lv syst function can be assessed using only volume data from P-V diagram

EF=[(LVEDV−LVESV)/LVEDV]

EF/ Ejection time obtained from Ao pressure tracing =Mean normalised syst ejection rate

MNSER=(LVEDV−LVESV)/(LVEDVхET) NL-EF(angio)=.72±0.08

Nl MNSER(angio)=3.32±0.84EDV/sec

Page 58: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

Vcf=velocity of the circumferential fiber shortening

Rate of shortening of lv myo fiber in a circmferential plane at the midpoint of the long axis of the ventricle

MeanVcf=end diast endocardial circum fiber length −end syst length

Vcf=(Ded−Des)/Ded(ET)

Nl-1.83±0.56ED circ/sec

Page 59: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

Drawbacks-influenced by preload & afterload

An Lvef≤.40 indicates depressed lv contractility, if there is no loading to account for the reduction.

Interpretation of ejection phase indices are improved by consideration of the preload & afterload.

Page 60: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION
Page 61: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION
Page 62: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

PRESSURE VOLUME LOOPS

Page 63: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

Fundamental principle of end-systolic Pv analysis is that, at end-systole there is a single line relating LV chamber vol to pressure,unique for the level of contractility & independent of loading conditions.

Most reliable index of contractility

Insensitive to changes in pre,afterload& heart rate

Slope of the end syst pr vol curve is called elastance-sensitive parameter

ESPVR

Page 64: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION
Page 65: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION
Page 66: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

Other indices

LVdp/dt max and EDV Slope of this as an

index of contractility

Page 67: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

Inverse relation between the two ↑afterload→↑syst

wallstress→↓myocardial shortening

Stress-shortening relationship

Page 68: EVALUATION OF SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

THANK YOU